Joined
·
7,018 Posts
...OK, I figured I would start a separate thread for any of you considering this fork. I will update this thread as I have more time with it.
..OK, Freak is in da house. I can't really do any research right now as I'm currently home alone & I'm afraid of it
...here is another pic for those of you curious. I put 125 psi in the negative & 35 psi in the positive chambers & it dropped the fork to around 5.25" of exposed stanchion. I cycled the shock a bunch & it seems to be holding that top out position. However, the more I have continued to fiddle around & cycle the fork the seals are getting a bit more compliant & the fork has crept about .25" back up. The thing feels super sticky in the initial portion of the stroke (normal) & I suspect, until a good thorough break-in process, I won't have a decent idea about either the quality of travel, or the fork's ability to maintain a shorter than advertised travel state.
..OK, Freak is in da house. I can't really do any research right now as I'm currently home alone & I'm afraid of it

...here is another pic for those of you curious. I put 125 psi in the negative & 35 psi in the positive chambers & it dropped the fork to around 5.25" of exposed stanchion. I cycled the shock a bunch & it seems to be holding that top out position. However, the more I have continued to fiddle around & cycle the fork the seals are getting a bit more compliant & the fork has crept about .25" back up. The thing feels super sticky in the initial portion of the stroke (normal) & I suspect, until a good thorough break-in process, I won't have a decent idea about either the quality of travel, or the fork's ability to maintain a shorter than advertised travel state.
