Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
G

·
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
For all you short-stay, rigid, KOPS fans, enjoy...



real bike, see here. I guess bottom bracket doesn't determine where the saddle is.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
bsieb said:
a little insight...
You can see by that picture how the toe clearance may not be such an issue either. Dunno.

I agree about that weird "stem".

I wonder how much different the bike would handle on trails. It's wheelbase is not as much longer as you would think.
 

·
saddlemeat
Joined
·
3,873 Posts
it reminds me a bit of the new cruiser style bikes where you can put your feet flat on the ground and still get leg extension because the bb is way ahead of the seat. Add a weird seat extended even further back and you have a new mountain biking experience. :thumbsup:
 

·
The White Jeff W
Joined
·
5,712 Posts
Looks fine for paved paths where you sit all the time but no way Id ride that off road where you need to stand and shift your weight around.
 

·
R.I.P. DogFriend
Joined
·
6,891 Posts
floydlippencott said:
Looks like bike built for a Circus Bear .
Hey now, I'll be the judge of that :p
=================================
Even IF climbing might be enhanced for some, I have to imagine descending intermediate to advanced terrain would be 'challenging' to say the least :eek:

As a 'casual' city bike, beach cruiser or path bike, it would be nice to be able to stop and put your feet down while seated.
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
Top