Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 20 of 30 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
64 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
after 10+ years of riding and racing my steel Indy Fab 26" SS, i decided to take the plunge to a 29er SS. i am having a Niner One being built up and need to decide on tires. my rubber of choice has been the 26" Conti Vertical Pro 2.3 for local trails in Truckee/N. Tahoe California.

been out of the loop on bike gear, so i was curious what folks might recommend in the 29er size that gives a similar ride? we are entering the "moon dust" phase of our mountain biking season in Tahoe, so things are getting looser with the summer tourists. i was thinking about Conti Mountain Kings 2.2.... but i have no idea?!?!

thoughts anyone?
 

·
.......
Joined
·
3,707 Posts
I've heard good things about Mountain Kings, but they wear quick. I'm currently on Panaracer Rampage f&r. Front is great, but they lack grip in the rear. I just ordered some Geax Saguaro 2.2's today and will see how they do. I've also had WTB ExiWolf and was not impressed. Nevegal's were ok, but won't buy again but will use it, if given to me.

If the Geax don't work, I'm going to try Small Block 8's or Ignitors.
 

·
openwound
Joined
·
580 Posts
I'm doing my riding in the Auburn area these days. Not quite the same as the Sierra's. I know how deep the dust can get up there. For that kind of deep, dusty conditions you guys have late season I'd use either Nevegal's or Panaracer Rampage's. Granted, neither of those tires are going to roll as quick as a SB8 but they'll hook up. I was running SB8's, which I like for their quickness, but they were only 2.1's so always left me wanting more -- volume/give/cushion. And unless I kept the rear tire perfectly weighted the climbing traction left a little something to be desired, especially in loose-over-hardpack conditions.

I've got one ride in on a set of the Geax Suguaro 2.2's. So far I like the tire. It's sorta between the big hook-'em-up tread of the rampage/nevegal and the super sleek fast SB8. But it's a bit too soon to give much of a review beyond that. I think they're worth a look. Just doing a visual comparison, I like the looks of their tread more so than that of those Conti's. The tread on the Mountain King's looks a bit thin/sparse.
 

·
Dirty South Underdog
Joined
·
1,733 Posts
I'm a fan of an Ignitor 2.1 in the front and Karma 1.9 in the rear. The Karma is available wider if you prefer, but for me, it works great.
 

·
Out spokin'
In cog? Neato!
Joined
·
14,456 Posts
If you like really fat tires like I do, I recommend the Maxxis Ardent 2.4. Not a light tire but it rolls well and I haven't found a condition yet for which it isn't up to the task (except gen-u-wine Orygun winter mud).

Disclaimers: (1) I'm a tire tester for Maxxis (though I feel unbiased) and (2) I live in Western Oregon where our trail treads consist of compacted loam that stays firm all summer -- very little moon dust.

--Sparty

P.S. Check MTBR's 29er board -- LOTS of tire threads there.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
417 Posts
I currently ride the conti mountain king 29 x 2.4's. They are certainly not a tru 2.4 tho....more close to a 2.25 or 2.3. Best investment I have made thus far!! As far as wearing down quickly im not all that sure I would agree with that statement. I do only have probably 100-150 miles or so on mine but they dont seem to be wearing down abnormally fast.

In any case I would highly recommend them!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
586 Posts
I am very envious of your place of residence. That is my favorite place in the world. Some of the best riding in the country if you know where to ride. Look at maxxis. With my 10 years of riding experience there I have had good luck with super knobbie xc race tires.

When I win the lottery i am going to buy a place on the lake in tahoe city.
 

·
master blaster
Joined
·
1,149 Posts
i rode:
nevegal 2.1
prowler sl 2.1
karma 1.9

ive only likes the karma 1.9
theyre light/fast/corner good/grip in dry silty uphill.....aka great tires.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
153 Posts
The 2.2 Mountain Kings do really well on my Jabberwocky. I haven't had problems with leaves, roots, rocks or mud in SW VA and WV. The 2.2 also has much lower knobs than the 2.4 so it rolls faster. It is kinda narrow more 2.0ish but on a SS it does really well
 

·
SSolo, on your left!
Joined
·
2,577 Posts
Geax Saguaro 29x2.2.....I really dislike the Nevegal on hardpack and loose over hardpack and they are just ok in sand/moondust. Nevegal is heavy and a slow roller....selling mine.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
851 Posts
Onehot,

I ride the new Spec. Purgatory 29er in our area (Tahoe City) an love it. I had rampages last year and while they had great traction, they didn't roll very well.

On my 29 SS, I have 2.4 up front and 2.2 in the back. I ride here and in the Bend area with this set up and have no problems ( ie: roll well, great traction , etc.)

If the 2.4 would have fit in the back, it would have been 2.4 all around. This is my first full season with a SS and the big Purgatory's really help here in TC.

I work at Tahoe Dave's (ski) in TC, call me (or PM me) for more local info.

Gary
 

·
SS or Die
Joined
·
354 Posts
If your riding rigid I would highly recommend a Swalbe Racing Ralph 2.4 up front and a Kenda Karma 1.9 does a great job at the rear. Both tires are nice and light and reasonably reliable.

A few guys have recommended the Ignitor 2.1 on the front and it is another great tire.

Racing Ralph 2.4 538-650 grams
Ignitor 2.1 675-725 grams
Kenda Karma L3R Pro 1.9 481-520 grams

Hope this helps.:thumbsup:
 

·
I don't huck.
Joined
·
2,543 Posts
The Mtn King can be a bit flexy on the large shoulder knobs on hardpack. Great winter/spring tire though. I have been liking the Specialized Purgatory on the front in a 2.2 but the 2.4 Purg is pretty light and big volume. Rear tires vary for me.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
276 Posts
I'm not a fan of MK 2.2's.
Strength-
1. Awesome traction in every environment and condition
Weaknesses-
2. Slow
3. Super Low volume. Have to run an abnormally high tire pressure otherwise I dent my rims.
4. Weak sidewalls.
5. Tread wears too quickly

I like these tires better
Jones ACX 2.2
Maxxis Ardent (2.25)
Ignitor
Crossmark (only as a rear tire in nice conditions)

BTW, I'm not a Maxxis tire tester but would like to be. Actually, I'd like to be a tire tester for any company. :)

Good luck.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,927 Posts
Tire selection is a very personal thing, but I can share with you my experiences:

I've had good luck with Bontrager XDX 2.1 at lower pressures. They have higher volume than the 2.3 WTB ExiWolf tires on my other bike. The XDX seems to roll fast and hook on just about everything. Only downside I can see is the weight.

ExiWolfs are great when they are new, but after some time their performance has rapidly decreased. Feels like my back end is sliding all over the place (and yet I still have what I would consider plenty of tread left).


People seem to rave about the Specialized Captain 2bliss tires. Those seem to be worthy of a try.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
133 Posts
+1 on the XDX 2.1. I'm running it on the rear with a 29-3 team edition front. Both TLR and worth the weight penalty if you like to run low pressures. 20 psi front and 22 rear with a 160pd rider and no burping or bottoming whatsoever.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,391 Posts
Sparticus said:
If you like really fat tires like I do, I recommend the Maxxis Ardent 2.4. Not a light tire but it rolls well and I haven't found a condition yet for which it isn't up to the task (except gen-u-wine Orygun winter mud).

Disclaimers: (1) I'm a tire tester for Maxxis (though I feel unbiased) and (2) I live in Western Oregon where our trail treads consist of compacted loam that stays firm all summer -- very little moon dust.

--Sparty

P.S. Check MTBR's 29er board -- LOTS of tire threads there.
While I like Maxxis tires as well, I am a disappointed that they will not warranty their LUST tires because I foolishly used sealant.
OTOH, Continental does not take issue with sealant and Mountain Kings will be my next tires, assuming I can get them for the 29er.
 

·
Out spokin'
In cog? Neato!
Joined
·
14,456 Posts
cbrossman said:
While I like Maxxis tires as well, I am a disappointed that they will not warranty their LUST tires because I foolishly used sealant.
OTOH, Continental does not take issue with sealant and Mountain Kings will be my next tires, assuming I can get them for the 29er.
I use 2.4 Mountain Kings here in Orygun to navigate our ridiculous winter mud -- they're dang fine. Not much a 2.4, though, but fine regardless.

--Sparty
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,927 Posts
RMcjd said:
+1 on the XDX 2.1. I'm running it on the rear with a 29-3 team edition front. Both TLR and worth the weight penalty if you like to run low pressures. 20 psi front and 22 rear with a 160pd rider and no burping or bottoming whatsoever.
I thought the team edition wasn't TLR?
 
1 - 20 of 30 Posts
Top