No--no mention of availability.WHere do you think this will fit in with the Nate and HuDu? Any mention of availability?
What makes you think the Knard will be narrower?No--no mention of availability.
My guesses:
Knard v. Nate: Knard will be lighter, faster rolling, less aggressive. Better for dry, worse for wet. More predictable when banked over, and narrower.
Knard v. HuDu: This will be an interesting one to see. Knard will be narrower, but I wonder how the rolling resistance and traction will compare.
Knard is a 3.8, by label. I'm guessing it's on the same casing as the Larry. HuDu is 4, by label.What makes you think the Knard will be narrower?
At first I saw this and thought big deal. But then I realized what this meant. I'm looking to replace my Larry. A 32" Knard would also require a whole new wheel. A Husker Du or this 26" Knard would be the cheapest and easiest upgrade.Knard is a 3.8, by label. I'm guessing it's on the same casing as the Larry. HuDu is 4, by label.
HuDu is significantly wider than Larry.
I'm sure there are other numbers out there but what I could find searching the forums is HuDu on a 80 mm rim 95.25 mm and Larry on same rim 96mm.Knard is a 3.8, by label. I'm guessing it's on the same casing as the Larry. HuDu is 4, by label.
HuDu is significantly wider than Larry.
I don't have the mm measurements in front of me at the moment, but as tried, back to back, on my 82mm Rolling Darryls, the HuDu was appreciably wider than a 3.8 Larry.I'm sure there are other numbers out there but what I could find searching the forums is HuDu on a 80 mm rim 95.25 mm and Larry on same rim 96mm.
I think the 29x3" Knard will be around 850gms, and I think the 26x4" Husker Du is closer to 1200gms.29x3 Knard is pretty light, isn't it? This one might be one of the lighter fatties...perhaps it'll beat the light HuDu?
Right. 1200 1250. Still pretty light for the size. I'm really liking the HDs.I think the 29x3" Knard will be around 850gms, and I think the 26x4" Husker Du is closer to 1200gms.