Joined
·
506 Posts
I apologize for another opinion/comparison thread but I'm looking to dive into a new bike genre with a mid-travel 650B for "aggressive trail riding". My 2 front runners for now are the SC Heckler R build and the Kona Process 134 DL, both 2015 models. Only issue is I have to drive considerable distances to see either bike first hand and demos are not available until next spring, so any input or advice would be appreciated.
Both bikes are very comparably equipped, the Heckler comes with a 150mm Pike paired to a Fox Float CTD Evo shock; the Process 135 DL comes with a 140mm Revelation RL paired to a Monarch RT shock. The only other notable componentry difference is the Heckler's Deore brakes vs. the Process' SLX brakes and a KS Super dropper post. The Heckler also comes with 2.3 High Roller II tires and the Process comes with a 2.4/2.25 Ardent combo. Otherwise they are equipped almost the same. One thing I favor slightly about the Heckler is the threaded BB vs the Pressfit 92 on the Process. The R build Heckler is just over $3k and the Process 134 DL is $3600.
I'm intrigued with the "modern geometry" of the Process, short 425 chainstays and longer TT but everyone seems to comment about this bike mainly for how it shines in the downhills. Everyone equally praises the Heckler/Bronson geo for it's "AM" friendlisness, although it is fairly different from the Kona so I'm not sure how to compare the 2 without actually getting to ride them.
The trails I ride are very tight and twisty singletrack, lots of short and steep ups and downs with very rocky/rooty climbs and descents. There are some very sharp/steep/techy switchbacks and sections I have trouble clearing on my current bike. I haven't done any dedicated DH/park riding and avoid larger jumps/drops mainly due to the limitations of my current short travel 29er setup. I don't have any plans to focus mainly on DH runs but I like knowing it would be an option with a longer travel setup like on the 2 bikes mentioned.
Of these two bikes, would one be a better fit for my riding than the other? Which would handle the techy climbs and low speed handling/cornering better?
Both bikes are very comparably equipped, the Heckler comes with a 150mm Pike paired to a Fox Float CTD Evo shock; the Process 135 DL comes with a 140mm Revelation RL paired to a Monarch RT shock. The only other notable componentry difference is the Heckler's Deore brakes vs. the Process' SLX brakes and a KS Super dropper post. The Heckler also comes with 2.3 High Roller II tires and the Process comes with a 2.4/2.25 Ardent combo. Otherwise they are equipped almost the same. One thing I favor slightly about the Heckler is the threaded BB vs the Pressfit 92 on the Process. The R build Heckler is just over $3k and the Process 134 DL is $3600.
I'm intrigued with the "modern geometry" of the Process, short 425 chainstays and longer TT but everyone seems to comment about this bike mainly for how it shines in the downhills. Everyone equally praises the Heckler/Bronson geo for it's "AM" friendlisness, although it is fairly different from the Kona so I'm not sure how to compare the 2 without actually getting to ride them.
The trails I ride are very tight and twisty singletrack, lots of short and steep ups and downs with very rocky/rooty climbs and descents. There are some very sharp/steep/techy switchbacks and sections I have trouble clearing on my current bike. I haven't done any dedicated DH/park riding and avoid larger jumps/drops mainly due to the limitations of my current short travel 29er setup. I don't have any plans to focus mainly on DH runs but I like knowing it would be an option with a longer travel setup like on the 2 bikes mentioned.
Of these two bikes, would one be a better fit for my riding than the other? Which would handle the techy climbs and low speed handling/cornering better?