Wouldn't that get you a shorted wheelbase? If so a 46 offset should handle faster?My understanding was that the Rip was designed around a 46mm offset. So a 140 pike with 46mm offset is what I have waiting in a box patiently for my Rip9RDO to arrive.
My understanding is that the minimal difference is the 51mm offset will steer a little quicker. I have no real world experience with a 51mm offset fork though, I just know the theory/geometry behind the design change.
Yes, there is a longer wheelbase with a 51mm offset fork but also a shorter trail number. Which results in a quicker steering bike.Wouldn't that get you a shorted wheelbase? If so a 46 offset should handle faster?
On steep climbs when you are pushing really hard the 51 will wander more when pulling on the bars & the 46 just tends to stay more were you want it.Why do you prefer the 46? Would the 51 keep the top tube lower?
The Rip9 works very well as it is with a 46 IMO,Ok. For a person that does as much climbing as decending a 46 makes for a better overall package
I like your link better than mine.:thumbsup: He does a good job of relating what the numbers mean in a more clear and down to earth manner that helps us make a more informed decision one way or the other.Here is a write-up on the difference:
Art's Cyclery Blog » Ask a Mechanic: 29er Forks ? 46mm or 51mm Offset?
Hot News: RockShox?s Monarch shocks get lighter touch with new DebonAir | Mountain Bike ReviewUpdated Monarch? Tell me more!
Nice, thanks! I just may get that for my new RIP.
I have the 51 and I agree with this, though going with wider bars has made this less of an issue, not that it was a big deal to begin with. I do appreciate the lighter feeling of the steering on the descents, though.On steep climbs when you are pushing really hard the 51 will wander more when pulling on the bars...