Joined
·
576 Posts
I was having the stock spring in my fork switched out, as well as having new upper seals, and all fluids changed out, which was all long overdue, when bicycle issues all popped up one after another, resulting in the image below:

Here is the current tally on what has gone wrong:
The fork rebuild went fine, until it was put back together and for whatever reason the Motion controll Dampener unit leaked out of the top of the fork. Parts are on order from SRAM through my local shop, which is who is doing the fork rebuild.
While the bike was down, i figured i would go ahead and take apart the linkage, clean up all the winter crap, re-grease and loc-tite the pivot bolts, etc.
When i pulled the BB linkage apart, the bearings were once again, demolished, not quite as bad as the first time, but two of them ended up leaving their outer race firmly pressed into the frame. So, lots of patient use of a hammer and punch and i was able to remove both outer races, one in the rocker arm, one in the swingarm.
So, Now we add 4 enduromax 688 bearings to the list.
additionally, my pivot mounting bolts are bent, and have play in them. so i have the reducers/spacers for the shock on order with Xfusion (or will tomorrow anyway), and the bolts, hopefully, will be ordered through performance bike from mongoose tomorrow.
The larger bearings feel no worse than at the beginning of last summer, so i am leaving them alone until they have more than just some slight indexing.
This is rediculous. i cannot even imagine how bad the design of the BB link pivot was before they made the improvements which was to move the bearings into the frame...
The BB link design is flawed:
this link transmits ALL the impacts and forces the rear swingarm encounters into the rocker arm, which compresses the rear shock, the BB link pivot uses bearings known as "microbearings". 4 of them. they should have used standard skate bearings, 608 bearings, instead of the microbearing 688., oh well. i like the bike, but what a design flaw. tear down and rebuild twice a year.

Here is the current tally on what has gone wrong:
The fork rebuild went fine, until it was put back together and for whatever reason the Motion controll Dampener unit leaked out of the top of the fork. Parts are on order from SRAM through my local shop, which is who is doing the fork rebuild.
While the bike was down, i figured i would go ahead and take apart the linkage, clean up all the winter crap, re-grease and loc-tite the pivot bolts, etc.
When i pulled the BB linkage apart, the bearings were once again, demolished, not quite as bad as the first time, but two of them ended up leaving their outer race firmly pressed into the frame. So, lots of patient use of a hammer and punch and i was able to remove both outer races, one in the rocker arm, one in the swingarm.
So, Now we add 4 enduromax 688 bearings to the list.
additionally, my pivot mounting bolts are bent, and have play in them. so i have the reducers/spacers for the shock on order with Xfusion (or will tomorrow anyway), and the bolts, hopefully, will be ordered through performance bike from mongoose tomorrow.
The larger bearings feel no worse than at the beginning of last summer, so i am leaving them alone until they have more than just some slight indexing.
This is rediculous. i cannot even imagine how bad the design of the BB link pivot was before they made the improvements which was to move the bearings into the frame...
The BB link design is flawed:

this link transmits ALL the impacts and forces the rear swingarm encounters into the rocker arm, which compresses the rear shock, the BB link pivot uses bearings known as "microbearings". 4 of them. they should have used standard skate bearings, 608 bearings, instead of the microbearing 688., oh well. i like the bike, but what a design flaw. tear down and rebuild twice a year.