Mountain Bike Reviews Forum banner
1 - 14 of 14 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
77 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I have a specialized pitch with a pike 327 fork. I'm wanting a fork that can handle more freeriding, something more beefy. A guy wants to trade his 2005 Marzocchi 66 RC that has 1 month of use and was just serviced for my pike 327. What do you think? The marzocchi 66 rc has been off the bike and in his basement for a long while cuz he bought a lyrik for the bike that had this fork. Is this a fair trade?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,903 Posts
its a big fork.. 30mm more travel, plus the taller AC height. it'll drastically change your bike, way taller front end.

its not a bad trade i guess, its just a very different fork! if thats what you're looking for, sure.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
77 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
tomsmoto said:
its a big fork.. 30mm more travel, plus the taller AC height. it'll drastically change your bike, way taller front end.

its not a bad trade i guess, its just a very different fork! if thats what you're looking for, sure.
AC height?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
77 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Schlitz Domino said:
AC-height= Axle to Crown height

You might also want to check if a fork that much taller voids your warranty.
Will do, btw do you think this is a good deal? How much harder will it make climbing trails?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
121 Posts
ECU_Pirate18 said:
Will do, btw do you think this is a good deal? How much harder will it make climbing trails?
Don't know anything about the 66, so I can't say if it is a good deal. You will notice it climbing, especially on the steeps where your front end will like to lift and wander more than before. Do you want a slacker head angle, a burlier fork, or both?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
41 Posts
ECU_Pirate18 said:
I want a fork that can handle the pretty big hits but I will be doing my fair share of climbing.
If you're prepared to deal with the longer fork, then yeah, I'd go for it. I had an 888 RC from 2005 and it was sick...basically the same thing.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
750 Posts
The 2005 66 series had really tall crowns, and as a result the AC height (as mentioned) is really tall. For the pitch, I'd say this is a bit of a sticking point.

Can the 66 be spaced internally down to 150mm? If so, this may get you a fork that can handle the big hits without ruining the frame geometry and sacrificing the integrity of the frame.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,802 Posts
NWfreeride said:
The 2005 66 series had really tall crowns, and as a result the AC height (as mentioned) is really tall. For the pitch, I'd say this is a bit of a sticking point.

Can the 66 be spaced internally down to 150mm? If so, this may get you a fork that can handle the big hits without ruining the frame geometry and sacrificing the integrity of the frame.
I agree with Adam.
I had this fork on my ASX and it is super tall. If you can drop it down to 150mm with an internal spacer, it'd make it much more suitable for the frame. I also know that your Pike is a very capable fork. The reason I know is because I own one too. I don't ride off of big things by any means but it has excelled on everything I ridden it on.
 

·
Living Ghetto Fabulous!
Joined
·
3,749 Posts
That year 66 has a very tall A to C height. It's taller than most modern triple clamp forks! Not a good idea for the Pitch IMO.

Edit: Axel to crown measurement on the 2005 170mm 66 was 595mm!!!!!!!!
 

·
Now with More Wood
Joined
·
2,964 Posts
Uncle Cliffy said:
That year 66 has a very tall A to C height. It's taller than most modern triple clamp forks! Not a good idea for the Pitch IMO.

Edit: Axel to crown measurement on the 2005 170mm 66 was 595mm!!!!!!!!
Holy hi-rise Batman, that's a tall front end you got there! :)

almost 3 cm taller AC than a 2010 Boxxer (568mm).

OP: better look for a used Lyric or Fox 36, be much better suited for the Pitch.
 

·
No Fear
Joined
·
1,286 Posts
If the 66 is a 170 mm travel model just forget about it. It would certainly crack your head tube within a few months . Its ride height is 595 mm shockingly more than 888 RC2X’s Boxxers and even Travis .
Marz its self found out its too high and lowered it 4 cm on the next generation ( RC2X ).
 
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
Top