Joined
·
1,417 Posts
I have a type two rear der in both SRAM (X9) and Shimano (XT shadow) mid cage versions. It appears that the upper guide wheel is mounted differently on the two brands. On Shimano the upper wheel is concentric to the cage pivot point and never moves as the cage moves fore/ aft. On SRAM the upper wheel appears to be offset to the rear just a bit. This causes the wheel to move up as the cage moves aft and down as the cage moves foreward.
Does the non-concentric upper wheel on SRAM give it an advantage in 1X conversions? Does it allow the chain to remain closer to the smaller cogs in the cassette to facilitate better shifting? Or, is there variations in the parallelogram linkages that allow the guide wheel on Shimano to follow as close to the cassette as SRAM?
Bottom line: Is there a consensus on which rear der design allows a better 1X10 conversion using a 42t cog?
I have done much reading and am seeing successes and issues using both brands of rear der/ shifters. Has anyone tried both on the same bike and felt one brand offered an advantage vs. the other based on rear der design?
Thanks!
Does the non-concentric upper wheel on SRAM give it an advantage in 1X conversions? Does it allow the chain to remain closer to the smaller cogs in the cassette to facilitate better shifting? Or, is there variations in the parallelogram linkages that allow the guide wheel on Shimano to follow as close to the cassette as SRAM?
Bottom line: Is there a consensus on which rear der design allows a better 1X10 conversion using a 42t cog?
I have done much reading and am seeing successes and issues using both brands of rear der/ shifters. Has anyone tried both on the same bike and felt one brand offered an advantage vs. the other based on rear der design?
Thanks!