Be sure to test the Specialized FSR XC for the same price.
I went with the FSR since then added disk brakes new rear and front shocks it rides very good. Its similar to the stumpy fsr but with less rear travel, although I added a 6.5" rear shock and now my rear travel exceeds a stumpy (of course still not a stumpy).walkman said:Be sure to test the Specialized FSR XC for the same price.
Anyone know how well KHS stands behind their product? In the reviews I like the lack of weaknesses of the KHS (the Specialized seems pretty good, but the common complaint of the low BB geometry worries me - that's something one just can't change once you buy it).Pedalfaraway said:KHS has a bike in your price range. XC704 I think is the model. Great part spec for the money. Personally I don't care for the ride of the fuel. The Specialized is certainly a good option as well.
Definatly the Specialized FSR XC or you can also check out the kikapu deelux. I'm going to be picking up the 2006 kikapu, I wouldent go KHS or Trek, i've had bad luck with bolth of them.GammaDriver said:I'm looking to get a FS rig - a quality one (preferably lifetime warranty on the frame) - for as little money as possible.
I was just given a price of $1300 for a Trek Fuel 80. I guess it's a good bike, save for the front shock, but is that a good price?
Thanks!
And it shows that if you shop smart, you can definitely fine a very nicely spec'd f/s bike for less than $1400.GammaDriver said:Here is what may be the bike of my recent dreams... problem is - I didn't realize that the local trails are completely (yes, completely) closed due to all the trees down from the hurricane. Trees on top of trees, on top of 300 foot Australian Pines. I may not be able to really test the bike for 6 months too a year unless I travel a lot. Oh well... that's south Florida
![]()