Click Here for Coverage of the Sea Otter Classic - a Celebration of Sport!
Home | Product Reviews | Tire | Continental Speed King

What's New
» Mtbr Video Upload Contest - Share your videos and enter to win
Grand Prize: Hayes Stroker Brakes!»
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content
» Michelin Tire Giveaway Contest!
Enter to Win a FREE Set of the Latest All Mountain Reinforced Tires from Michelin»

» Buy Mtbr Jerseys
Click here to view or buy the jersey and shorts.  Support Mtbr.com and order your set today.

View or buy
Mtbr Swag here»
Latest Articles and Reviews:


Quick Poll
Have you ever broken a bone due to a bike crash?
 yes
 no
 no, but came really close to it

View Results
Photo Caption Contest (sponsored by Maxxis)
Enter here


Continental Speed King

Average Rating 4.07/5
# of Reviews 14
MSRP $ 30.00
Weight 400 grams
More Products from Continental

Description:
    The Speed King is designed for marathon racing. This tire offers low rolling resistance and secure grip at 510g. The tread of the Speed King masters various terrain, from fire road to moist singletrail.
Where To Buy


Jenson USA



BikePartsUSA.com

Other Ways To Shop
  • Buy and Sell the from our Classifieds.
  • Shop for Similar Products

    Performance
    Nashbar

    Submit a Review


      Submitted by Sven Jacobsen a Cross Country Rider from BW, Germany
      Date Reviewed: 4/18/2008 12:58:50 AM
      Duration Product Used: 3 months
      Strengths: Great grip, fast, light, durable, good allrounder.
      Weaknesses: None, really.
      Similar Products Tried: A lot.
      Bike Setup: Hardtail.
      Bottom Line: This is an update. I am using this tire for almost 5 months. In my opinion it´s the best tire on my bike so far. You can´t go wrong with it. The wire version in 2.3 is amazing and so cheap for training purposes. The Speed King 2008, 2.3 Protection (foldable), is my personal non-plus-ultra-tire for XC and marathon. The weight is 580gr - no complaints for a safe tire. I´m still wondering, how fast and secure I can ride (gave me some extra motivation). Well done, Conti!
      Value Rating: 5 Overall Rating: 5

      Submitted by scott a Racer from dalton, ga, usa
      Date Reviewed: 4/9/2008 8:28:43 AM
      FavoriteTrail: pinhoti
      Duration Product Used: 1 Year
      Price Paid: $40
      Purchased At: lbs
      Strengths: very good in the mud, lite weight, low rolling res.
      Weaknesses: none really
      Similar Products Tried: lots of different tires
      Bike Setup: turner nitrous, full xtr, king wheel, rs reba world cup
      Bottom Line: excellent tire in wet conditions.
      Value Rating: 5 Overall Rating: 5

      Submitted by Sven Jacobsen a Cross Country Rider from BW, Germany
      Date Reviewed: 1/17/2008 11:04:52 AM
      FavoriteTrail: hard to say
      Duration Product Used: Less than 1 month
      Strengths: Fast, light, reliable and definitely thought-out.
      Weaknesses: Tread unfortunately not designed for eternity.
      Similar Products Tried: A lot.
      Bike Setup: Hardtail.
      Bottom Line: Ask yourself, for what purposes you use your tires. This one is designed for marathon racing and not for the Transalp Challenge or a suicide downhill. For marathon and even xc it´s splendid! I use the wire version in 2.3 for training(supercheap, a pair for 20,- Euro). This 2.3 wire version is light, offers grip and warp-speed on the trails and is surprisingly tough enough when the terrain gets heavy.
      Fun factor! For this 2.3 wire version: Five Flamin´ Chilis without any doubts.
      Value Rating: 5 Overall Rating: 5

      Submitted by Marc Monet a Cross Country Rider from Oxford, England
      Date Reviewed: 12/21/2007 5:19:40 PM
      FavoriteTrail: Alps
      Duration Product Used: 3 months
      Price Paid: $90
      Strengths: weight
      Weaknesses: price, grip, puncture protection
      Bottom Line: Even though the tire is known as Speed King there are actually a number of different versions, which differ dimension, weight, and protection wise, but share the same “spikey, open” tread. The tire is advertised as a xc tire, specifically for marathon racing. I used the 2.1 supersonic version for racing and see little point in purchasing any of the other versions; if you want an all round or freeride tire why buy this one. Given that the tire was designed for marathon racing I did find (a) traction not very predictable (especially on gravel roads and in wet conditions it was far cry from being “grippy”) and (b) it to be extremely puncture prone. I am therefore inclined to echo some of the feedback below. Yes, the tire is “made in Deutschland” (which generally is a comforting sign) but so what!? The facts are that this tire, it has to be said, was designed for racing but fails to live up to the high expectations one should have given the proclaimed characteristics and indeed the price.
      Value Rating: 1 Overall Rating: 1

      Submitted by Kevin a Racer from Winnipeg, MB Canada
      Date Reviewed: 12/5/2007 8:58:14 AM
      FavoriteTrail: Birch
      Duration Product Used: 6 months
      Price Paid: $70
      Purchased At: Bikes & Beyond
      Strengths: SS version is light weight, low rolling resistance, decent traction in wet conditions
      Weaknesses: thin sidewalls, VERY fast wearing is SS version
      Similar Products Tried: conti explorers, nokian nbx
      Bottom Line: good all rounder for racing, but would choose something less expensive and flat prone for trail riding.
      Value Rating: 4 Overall Rating: 3

      Submitted by ron jeremy a Cross Country Rider from las vegas, nv
      Date Reviewed: 11/20/2007 3:57:54 PM
      FavoriteTrail: vicodin valley
      Duration Product Used: 6 months
      Price Paid: $40
      Purchased At: lbs
      Strengths: tread pattern, rubber compound, sheds mud well
      Weaknesses: pricey (but actually made in Deutschland)
      Similar Products Tried: all
      Bike Setup: xc hardtail
      Bottom Line: I picked up the 2.3 folding version with the Protection sidewalls about six months back and have been very pleased. Dry traction is great, wet traction is not bad, and haven't flatted yet. Note from above...I did my homework and bought the Protection version with the heavier duty sidewalls. If you're a weight weenie and pick up the SuperSonic version (bare minimum construction, race-day only), don't be surprised when you flat out...duh. Of course, a decent shop will point you in the right direction.

      5 flamin' turds overall and disregard folks who have no clue about what they're purchasing/installing.
      Value Rating: 5 Overall Rating: 5

      Submitted by A 2 K a Cross Country Rider from Iowa
      Date Reviewed: 10/8/2007 9:46:00 AM
      Duration Product Used: 3 months
      Price Paid: $70
      Purchased At: online
      Strengths: rolling resistance
      sheds mud well
      Weaknesses: does not inspire confidence in turns
      noisy

      the tire seems to have a mind of its own. the knobs on the side walls tend to make the tire shoot off on its own line, pulling you, the rider, off your chosen line. slimy singletrack causes the tire to slip when you want to really grab a corner at speed...no confidence at all
      Similar Products Tried: specialized roll-x (terrible)
      conti explorer pro
      conti twister supersonic
      Bike Setup: '07 stumpy comp, stock
      Bottom Line: I rolled with these tires for 150+ miles and just couldn't get the hang of the way that they grab their own line, especially while climbing. Also, I could not gain any confidence in my line while cornering with any sort of speed. The tire felt like it wouldn't hold ; like it was going to wash out any second. When I first started riding XC back in May of 2007, my bike had the Conti Explorer Pro 2.1 up front and Twister Pro 1.9 in the rear. I was happy with this setup. Being new to the sport, I wanted to try something different. The reviews for the speed king in this thread were great so I figured I would give them a go. The first thing I noticed during the initial climb was that they wanted to take off on their own, not where I pointed them. the same thing happened in the corners. I thought this was due to the fact that I wasn't used to them so I gave them their chance with 150+ miles of use. Well, 2 rides ago I switched back to the explorer/twister setup and WOW what a difference they have made. Now, some people will ride a trail somewhere, switch tires and go ride a different trail and make their judgments. I believe this doesn't give the rider a level playing field to make a comparison. So what i did was make the switch after a 10 mile ride on my local trail that I am intimately familiar with. HUGE difference! I was holding lines like never before, riding faster, and mastering corners that I always had difficulty with. so this could be a testament to the explorer/twister combo as well as a lackluster review on the speed kings.
      Value Rating: 1 Overall Rating: 2

      Submitted by Tom a Racer from Cambridge, MA, USA
      Date Reviewed: 8/30/2007 2:54:44 PM
      Duration Product Used: Less than 1 month
      Price Paid: $100
      Purchased At: Bike shop in Germany
      Strengths: Light, good tire clearance.
      Weaknesses: Extremely puncture prone, expensive, as front tire sketchy in wet conditions (as rear tire OK).
      Similar Products Tried: Not really similar, but I used Schwalbe's Nobby Nic 2.1 before.
      Bike Setup: Stevens Juke, Rock Shox SID World Cup, Shimano XTR, Magura Marta SL, Syntace (bars, stem, seatpost), Tune King/Kong wheels, Look 4x4.
      Bottom Line: Here is the whole tragedy:

      I am a vivid MTBer and race XC since several years. I purchased Continental's Speed King Supersonic (2.1) tires (rar and front) about a month ago, during vacations in Germany. As mentioned above, I used Schwalbe's Nobby Nic (rear and front) with latex tubes before, which worked great. However, due to the fact that two Speed King Supersonic tires (at 400 grams each) shave almost 200 grams from my wheels, compared to the Nobby Nics, and based on really positive reviews (also in this mtbr tread) I thought I would give it try.

      Unfortunately, the tires turned out to be a disappointment. On the plus side, they are really light and rolling resistance is great. One of my first rides was in really muddy terrain and tire clearance was excellent, even though I had several sketchy moments with the front tire (i.e. side grip is not really convincing and, in my opinion, hard to control if used as a front tire). After two rides, however, I had my first proper puncture. Given the sketchy characteristics of the Speed King as a front tire, I decided to re-mount an old Nobby Nic (as front tire only). This worked fine for about two rides. Back in Boston, my first ride took place in the Middlesex Fells, which is a local reservation with some sweet rocky single trail. During this ride a rock completely destroyed the sidewall of my remaining Speed King, which I could barely fix with the packaging of a Clif bar.

      In conclusion: I learned the hard way what I could perhaps have known before. While light tires tend to save weight and watts they are usually also very susceptible to punctures. Continental’s Speed King Supersonic is no exception, despite some enthusiastic reviews. I cannot really think of any situation where one might like to use this tire. As far as I am concerned the tire is too delicate for XC and it therefore becomes somewhat of a gamble to use them in a race; the seconds one might save are hopelessly lost if one punctures. (Needless to say that I decided to go back to my old tires, even thought they are 200 grams heavier.)
      Value Rating: 2 Overall Rating: 1

      Submitted by Kevin a Cross Country Rider from Hastings, MN
      Date Reviewed: 8/27/2007 5:10:53 PM
      Duration Product Used: Less than 1 month
      Price Paid: $49
      Purchased At: The Route
      Strengths: All the traction I ever wanted in a tire, in many trail conditions, cornering, climbing, and braking.
      Weaknesses: none
      Similar Products Tried: Panaracer Cinder, IRC Mimbro, IRC Mythos
      Bike Setup: Giant NRS 2, suspension set up stiff, 50 psi tire pressure
      Bottom Line: Tried many tires over the years looking for that ultimate tire. This is it. Bought these two days before a 24 hour race cause just wasn't happy with the tires I was riding. Could not believe how well these hooked up. Had a hard time getting use to all the traction, but once I did, I was cornering, riding off camber, and through technical singletrack faster and with more confidence then ever. Highly recommend these tires. Bought the 2.1 duraskin version and they weighed in a 535 grams.
      Value Rating: 5 Overall Rating: 5

      Submitted by Mark a Cross Country Rider from Ont Canada
      Date Reviewed: 8/5/2007 7:17:24 PM
      Duration Product Used: Less than 1 month
      Price Paid: $70
      Strengths: Weight, Grip, Fast rolling
      Weaknesses: That's a tiny case volume for a 2.1 tire.
      Similar Products Tried: Python tubeless, small block 8, fire xc pro,....
      Bike Setup: Blur LT, Mavic, XTR, 200mm rotors. o/s bars.... big guy setup
      Bottom Line: My quest for a fast rolling tire with better grip in the turns has brought me here. I was pleasantly surprised when these tires hit the trail. They make the bike feel like it’s 10 pounds lighter. The steering is WAY faster. Pythons are just a fraction faster rolling but the speed kings make up for it 10 fold at the first corner. Acceleration is in a different league all together. They are just flat out fast out of corners. Cornering on hard packed, lose over hard packed, pine forest is great. The well-spaced side knobs hook hard in the turns. When you get way too aggressive they will let you know with a controlled slide. It's an impressive climbing tire as well. They fair well in the odd sand section and are sure footed over rocks.

      If you are looking for a fly weight (400g) race tire that is fast rolling, ultra quick feeling tire with plenty of corner grip for the technical section you owe it to yourself to try a set. They are on the high end of the price scale for a non tubeless tire so it gets 4 chilis for value.

      If you are a bit gravity challenged you may consider the 2.3 for the extra volume.
      Value Rating: 4 Overall Rating: 5

      Submitted by Yogi a Weekend Warrior from Sydney Australia
      Date Reviewed: 7/3/2007 7:47:52 AM
      Duration Product Used: Less than 1 month
      Purchased At: Le Spit Cyclery
      Strengths: really good traction. Big Bag (2.3)
      Weaknesses: none yet
      Similar Products Tried: python, old style cheaper tyres like smoke dart combo.
      Bike Setup: XC race set up... high seat , rigid frame.
      Bottom Line: I felt these tyres with my thumb and nail and they felt super soft.. I was keen to ride on these...

      Fitting the tires on my rims was easy and tool-less (I do use tubes). I had a hard time seating the bead into the rim so I over inflated them till they went ping (approximately 80 psi)and deflated them to about 50 to 55 psi. prior to the over inflation they looked like a bucked wheel with a bulging tire on it. Once seated they ran straight and true.

      My first use of these tires was on the wrong surface.I was worried about the soft knobs being eaten by the tar but they all still had their great shape. ... at speed they sang like a choir then i hit a few stairs up and down. nooo problem.
      when riding directly into the bottom stair badly .. the corner of the stair sank about half way in to the rim... I watched the tire do this as it was a TEST. I'M happy to say the tire did better than my free ride ones.
      I was also impressed with the grip... however I was ever so careful not to skid. They did hold very well in turns and did not give the quivers at all.

      2 weeks later I finally got them onto the dirt, or I should say the mud as it rained for a week when I decided to try them...

      firstly: they stick to everything... they roll fast and I was very impressed on the single track and the carving turns on the berms.

      Secondly,Uphill they are great, Light weight and good drive wheel traction... they don't feel heavy or twitchy on the front either. In fact I recommend them for any XC front tire without hesitation.

      Downhill i gave these tires a absolute whipping in the slippery clay , compacted sand and the mud and they where confident and a pleasure. Then In the rock garden they really did shine.. it was to blurry to watch but no single rock smaller than the height of my crank arm did slow me down nor puncture me and yeah I made a few mistakes... even on the mossy reverse camber wet rock the tire behaved really very well.

      I was really impressed by this set of tires.

      Definitely a good choice for the 24 hour racer, adventure racer or just the person who demands the best...

      Not good for loaning to the kids who skid.

      Unlike the above reviewer, I do not recommend using them below 50 psi on rough terrain... I noticed the cross hashing folding thing happening in the side wall... so would be ok on smooth dirt only.. So I do recommend the fast harder tire compared to the uber grippy soft tire.

      these tires are avaliable 2.1 and 2.3
      and come in 4 types...2.1 / 2.3

      TYPE : 2.1 / 2.3
      ******************
      wire: 560 g / 600g
      folding: 510g / 560g
      pro traction: 530g / 580g
      supersonic: 400g / 450g

      I used the 2.3 pro traction

      (thanks for the tires Matt, You asked me to test them out... and HEY, they are good.. cheers mate)



      Value Rating: 5 Overall Rating: 5

      Submitted by bill a Weekend Warrior from tucson,co
      Date Reviewed: 7/1/2007 7:26:36 AM
      Duration Product Used: Less than 1 month
      Strengths: It is hard to believe when you look at these tires that they are ~600 grams (2.3 protection). They offer big knobs as compared to other light weight tires (racing ralphs).
      Similar Products Tried: racing ralphs, kenda small block
      Bottom Line: I really liked racing ralphs, but decided to try the speed kings. They are cheaper $ and offer a more aggressive footprint. I am a convert.
      Value Rating: 5 Overall Rating: 5

      Submitted by trail boss a Weekend Warrior from bfe, nowheresville
      Date Reviewed: 5/22/2007 9:07:36 AM
      FavoriteTrail: mount jumpmore
      Duration Product Used: 3 months
      Price Paid: $30
      Purchased At: shop
      Strengths: low rolling resistance but hi traction, sheds mud, light weight, german quality
      Weaknesses: none yet
      Similar Products Tried: velociraptors, nanoraptors, smokes, you name it...
      Bike Setup: rigid ss
      Bottom Line: I've been trail riding for 30 years (no, not a typo)and these are the best tires I've run yet. I was a bit skeptical at first due to the small, widely spaced knobs, but the traction is out of this world. It seems that this tread pattern sheds mud and gunk, and hooks up like crazy. This is essentially an all-around trail tire, but it is most happy on hardpack, where the low rolling resistance really shows. I'm running these on a single-speed, and about 50 psi to avoid pinch-flats, and this really works well with the sizing, tread pattern, etc. Even when climbing, though I've yet to slip a tire.

      As far as the sizing is concerned, Conti actually measures from tip-to-tip so you know exactly how much frame clearance you have. Some companies measure the casing, which means a fatter tire. However, it sucks when your $40 tires rub your chainstays. So, if you're running 2.1 WTBs or Kendas, then you may want to bump up to a 2.3 Conti. Then again, you may want to try the skinnier Conti-the better traction and lower rolling resistance are amazing.
      Value Rating: 5 Overall Rating: 5

      Submitted by Lennon a Cross Country Rider from Wakefield, RI
      Date Reviewed: 2/1/2007 9:03:06 AM
      FavoriteTrail: Breakheart Trail, Arcadia Management Area
      Duration Product Used: Less than 1 month
      Price Paid: $120
      Purchased At: W.E. Stedman & Co...THE BEST LBS ANYWHERE!!
      Strengths: Super low rolling resistance, Very light (406g), substantial knobs, works well tubeless
      Weaknesses: None so far...
      Similar Products Tried: Maxxis MaxxLite 310's and just about everything else out there
      Bike Setup: 2002 S-Works FSR SS, FRM Integral Cranks, SID WC, Quad Ti Eggbeaters, Stans Olympic Disc Wheels, Ti Rotors, Avid BB7's, Extralite Levers and Seat Post, WTB Stealth V Team Saddle (I smushed my Becker Carbon), Easton EC90 SL Flat Bar, Syntace f99 Stem, Jagwire Gold Label housings Total: 19.8 lbs
      Bottom Line: Very fast rolling tire with a great tread. Riding a SS gives you pretty good traction skills anyways, but these tires rock. They set up tubeless pretty easily and after two or three rides were holding air with maybe a 10-15% loss over three days. That is good for a non tubeless tire with a thin sidewall. Expect to see pinholes in the sidewalls when you mount them, but the stan's will quickly fill those in.
      These tires are sticky, too. I am not going to complain about a 400 gram tire not having enough tread like some of these reviews do. What do you expect from a light tire?! My biggest fear with these tires is either a cut in the sidewall or blowing it off the rim. I cut my Maxxis Maxxlite after 10 rides and it was done, so I repleced them with the Conti's. I am running 35 psi and wouldn't run any more for fear of the blowoff. I would ride these down to 28 or 30 psi, but no less.
      The profile of these tires at 2.1 is more like a 1.9. I have had no problems in wet, mud and frozen conditions, so far. I am much more confident in the fast corners than with the MaxxLites, but that is not saying much.
      After I cut the MaxxLite, I put a Pair of Specialized Roll-X tires on and what slugs they were! I couldn't believe how slow they rode.
      From a serious weight weenie who actually rides his light bike, I have to say these tires are outstanding. They do not seem to be wearing out quickly (only 10 or so rides on them). Maybe the hand made element just puts them a notch up. I am getting ready to buy another pair for my spare bike. Fantastic.
      Value Rating: 5 Overall Rating: 5



    Contact Us  •   About Us  •   Terms of Use  •   Privacy Policy  •   Advertising
     MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
     PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
     AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com
    Copyright ©1996-2007 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda      RSS Feed