|
|
Average Rating
|
4.13/5
|
|
# of Reviews
|
23
|
|
MSRP
|
$
|
|
Weight
|
|
|
More Products from Schwalbe
Submit a Review
|
|
|
Description:Nobby Nic combines the incompatible: It has devine grip and goes like the devil. How is that possible? Triple compound - an MTB tire first -, combined with the super-fast carcass used by Racing Ralph.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Submitted by
Slow
a Cross Country Rider
from Golden, CO
Date Reviewed: June 17, 2008 | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$60.00 | | Strengths: | Mounts VERY easily, very grippy (until the knobs rip off) | | Weaknesses: | 2.25 is actually a 2.1. Rear tire absolutely shredded in 15 rides. A bit on the spendy side- especially considering life. | | Bike Setup: | Yeti 575 Race Kit | | Bottom Line: | I have been a life-long mission to find the perfect MTB tire. I will have to keep looking. I was excited to hear about Schwalbe's. Lightweight, triple compound, grip, cornering, great rolling resistance, blah, blah... I REALLY wanted to love this tire, but was left disappointed. It was absolutely destroyed after about 15 rides. Granted 10 of those rides were Moab/Fruita, but I have never trashed a tire so fast. Almost every single corner knob on the back is peeled back exposing threads. Front tire held up better, but to thin for my liking.
This tire is labeled 2.25, but looks like a 2.1 to me. I ran the UST version on my Crossmax STs. It mounted very easily. I had too much pressure is at first (around 36-38) and they felt a little too twitchy. I dropped the pressure to about 30-32 and they felt much better. But then it started to self-destruct. I understand that it's a tough life being a rear MTB tire, but $60 should buy a better tire.
Maybe a XC racer who used this tire on their race-only wheels would like this, but not for daily use on rocky trails. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
bigfatadder
a Downhiller
from Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Date Reviewed: June 11, 2008 | | Favoriate Trail: | Hills | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Strengths: | Best climbing tyre ever tried! Cranks up technical climbs in any conditions! Freak tyre! | | Weaknesses: | Very weak tyre, XC use only | | Similar Products Used: | Many | | Bike Setup: | Ventana La Bruja | | Bottom Line: | Get it if you want a climber! It's pretty good all round if you like light tyres. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
supersleeper
a Cross Country Rider
from South Africa
Date Reviewed: June 5, 2008 | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$50.00 | | Strengths: | Easy to fit, good grip, rolls good for a trail tire. | | Weaknesses: | Price, very soft compound. I bought the 2.1 and put it on a 17mm rim. It measures 1.8 inch | | Similar Products Used: | Crossmarks, Kenda kharma, SB8, Specialized control | | Bike Setup: | Giant Anthem XT spec. | | Bottom Line: | Rolls well for a trail tire. You will feel the resistance when you go over 20km/h though (compared to Racing Ralph).
Good grip on most terrain. Rocks, hardpack, loose over hard, mud. Don't overinflate them on hardpack. It can cause a "drifting" feeling.
I will give them good marks as a trail tire. It will slow you down when you do XC racing. Haven't had any flats (I run the folding tires tubeless with Joe's) | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ywain Ap Rhys
a Weekend Warrior
from New Forest, UK
Date Reviewed: April 10, 2008 | | Favoriate Trail: | Cwm Carn | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$50.00 | | Purchased At: | Yellow Cycles | | Strengths: | inflates to the size it says it will, which is rare. Very Light. Very Grippy. | | Weaknesses: | Side wall too thin. | | Similar Products Used: | Conti Verticals, Speed Kings, Ritchey Bulldog [utter sh1te] | | Bike Setup: | Trance, Revelations, Juicy 7s. | | Bottom Line: | Fantastic whilst they last, but I ripped the sidewall going for a quick evening ride in the new forest. If you can look after these tyres, they will look after you, but if you ride gung-ho [and why not] then you need something a bit tougher. Think I'm going for a Maxxis High-Roller. A bit heavier, but better than walking 6miles home. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Warp
a Weekend Warrior
from Mexico City, Mexico
Date Reviewed: February 14, 2008 | | Favoriate Trail: | Too many... | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Price Paid: |
$45.00 | | Purchased At: | Red Barn Bicycles | | Strengths: | Light, Very Good all arounder, construction of the tyre is second to none, no defects and I've had three Schwalbes now.
Simply there isn't a faster tyre for the amount of grip. | | Weaknesses: | Very thin sidewalls. | | Similar Products Used: | Kenda BG Stick-E 2.1", Panaracer Rampage 2.35", WTB Motoraptor Comp 2.14" and 2.4", Michelin Hot S, WTB Velociraptors, Spesh Roll-X Comp 2.0" and Adrenaline Comp 2.0", IRC Mythos, Hutchinson Spiders 2.1" | | Bike Setup: | Titus Switchblade 2004, Pike 454, SRAM + RF drivetrain, Hope hubs, etc. | | Bottom Line: | There is no faster tyre with the same amount of grip. They're stupid light to start with. Though, as they follow by the letter the ETRTO standard, at useable pressures they come undersized.
The 2.25" is a real 2.1" and the 2.4" is a real 2.25"... but they're pretty tall at a hair over 2" tall for the 2.25" and well over the 2" for the 2.4". That gives a very high volume.
They are awesome all arounders. Grip in all conditions is really good without being spectacular. Rolling resistance is really low but surprisingly, traction is really good on all kind of surfaces... More surprisingly yet, is that the compound is very durable.
More likely, they'll give up at the flanks, rather than wear the tread.
The casing is very compliant to terrain even at higher pressures and with thick tubes.
Cornering... Not bad at all. Predictable and sufficient, however there are much better tyres for cornering (Rampages, for example). In my opinion, the tyre should have to be shorter in height to have better cornering. But they do really good.
Only thing is that they should not be very durable in rocks, because of the thin sidewalls.
As mentioned above, the quality of the tyre itself is the highest I've seen... Seriously. I know that matters little on the trail, but it's really impressive. They have much better quality than the Japan Made Panaracer Rampage.
I'm giving four chilies on value because these babies aren't cheap... and well, even when the quality is second to none, it's just a tyre. It'll wear as any other.
Overall... four chilies. For a rear tyre, they're the best all arounder. Fastest tyre for the grip. Light, incredible. However, cornering and durability could be better. Don't get me wrong, they are well above average but that doesn't mean Schwalbe can't improve these two points. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Curt
a Weekend Warrior
from Midway City Ca
Date Reviewed: January 8, 2008 | | Favoriate Trail: | Porc | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Price Paid: |
$42.00 | | Purchased At: | The Path | | Strengths: | Light for it's size (600g 2.3), great all around grip in the dry S.W. U.S.wears well.
| | Weaknesses: | Fragile casing (I've had to patch 4 1/2" casing cuts) expensive and hard to find. | | Similar Products Used: | All the 2.3-2.4 Kenda and conti tires, 2.35 Rampage, WTB's from 2.25 to 2.4, Geax Burro 2.3. | | Bike Setup: | 5 Spot 27.5 lbs Marz xc 700 sl | | Bottom Line: | Great all around tire if fragile in shale but very expensive these days so I don't know that I'll buy them again, if I could still find them for $42 I'd run them but the 100g weight savings dosn't make up for the $20 higher price for such an easily cut tire. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Duncan
a Weekend Warrior
from NSW, Australia
Date Reviewed: December 3, 2007 | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Strengths: | Fast rolling for the amount of grip it gives. This even applies when pressures reduced. Construction appears to be excellent. These pump up straighter than any thing else I have seen in a longer while. | | Weaknesses: | I bit exposed to sidewall damage | | Similar Products Used: | Many and varied. Previously Kenda Karma and Cortez | | Bike Setup: | Ellsworth Distance set up for endurance events. X-Fusion forks and shock. | | Bottom Line: | I really like these. (26 x 2.25 Evolution) The front was a bit unpredictable and dumped me a couple of times until I reversed the rolling direction. Not sure about direction on the rear. I recommend running these at lower than normal pressures and really taking advantage of the extra grip with very little rolling resistance. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
KEVIN
a Weekend Warrior
from SAN RAFAEL
Date Reviewed: November 12, 2007 | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$60.00 | | Purchased At: | ONLINE | | Strengths: | GRIP WELL IN ALL CONDITIONS , PREDICTABLE | | Weaknesses: | SIDE KNOBS TORE OFF FRONT AND REAR TIRES AFTER 2 MONTHS | | Similar Products Used: | NEVEGALS , VERT. PRO , WEIRWOLFE ETC | | Bike Setup: | IBIS CARBON MOJO | | Bottom Line: | WAS HAPPY WITH THESE TIRES UNTIL I NOTICED THAT SIDE KNOBS WERE RIPPING OFF REAR TIRE AFTER 2 MONTHS OF WEEKEND USE , FRONT TIRE IS STARTING TO DO IT TOO , $65 EACH FOR 2.4 KEVELAR TIRES THAT ONLY LAST A COUPLE OF MONTHS OF WEEKEND RIDING IS B.S.. THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED WITH THE NEVEGALS THAT THESE TIRES REPLACED (ALTHOUGH NEVEGAL CENTER TREAD WEARS QUICKLY) | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Alan
a
from Monteggio, Switzerland
Date Reviewed: July 28, 2007 | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$32.00 | | Strengths: | Light
Fast
Good "Grip" | | Weaknesses: | weak sidewalls | | Similar Products Used: | Specialized Pro
Schwalbe Albert
Maxxis Larssen TT | | Bike Setup: | Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Expert 2006 | | Bottom Line: | I get the 2.25 x 26, a good tire but too many punctures because of the thin sidewalls!!
| | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
dedy
a
from Jakarta, Indonesia
Date Reviewed: June 14, 2007 | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Strengths: | Lightweight (VERY) | | Weaknesses: | thin wall on the regular version | | Similar Products Used: | mythos xc, Schwalbe smart sam | | Bottom Line: | using a narrow/xc rims made this tyres very fast.. when i changed to wider rims (sunrim singletrack) it became very "grippy". Guess i should use the SOS for better balance between traction and speed. I'm using 2.4 up front and 2.25 rear.. my rear tyre has "snake skin" wall that made it thick and more reliable when riding on the rocks.
Extremely light for tyres this big.. love it | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Luis Fontão
a Weekend Warrior
from Guimarães, Portugal
Date Reviewed: May 24, 2007 | | Favoriate Trail: | Penha | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$50.00 | | Purchased At: | hibike.de | | Strengths: | Light tires, good rolling, good curving and not the most expensive. | | Weaknesses: | Extremely weak side walls, not very large for a 2.4. Not durable | | Similar Products Used: | Nokian NBX 2.3 (these are great durable tires), Conti Vertical Pro 2.3, Hutchinson Mosquito | | Bike Setup: | SC Heckler, 36 Van, 5th coil,Hope M4 , Nobby Nic's 2.4 | | Bottom Line: | Scratches in the sidewall (on the rear tire) start to open and has been screwed my rides (even after it was patched). They're light and good rolling, but the stupid thin sidewalls makes this a poor tire! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
donal
a Weekend Warrior
from Zurich
Date Reviewed: April 24, 2007 | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$40.00 | | Purchased At: | Cycle shark, Zurich | | Strengths: | Great all round tire. | | Weaknesses: | Feedback could be better. Hard to find good balance of tire pressure and ride. | | Similar Products Used: | Kenda Nevegal 2.1". Continental vertical pros | | Bike Setup: | Santa Cruz Heckler, Nobly Nic 2.25" rear (~1.6 bar), 2.4" Front (~1.7 bar) | | Bottom Line: | Great all round tire, but a little disappointing after running Kenda Nevegals (2.1 front and rear) for over a year. The Kenda 's had everything. However in comparison the Nolbly Nics are almost technically as good but just don't have the same feedback and reassuring feel that your completely in control. I'm 79 kg with gear and I feel 2.4 is too big for front.
They've been good but I'll be back to Kenda Nevegals for my next set of rubbers! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Yizhar Ganor
a Weekend Warrior
from Israel
Date Reviewed: April 1, 2007 | | Favoriate Trail: | Ben Shemen | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$55.00 | | Purchased At: | Haofan | | Strengths: | I used the UST version 2.25 on front wheel. totally enjoyed the ride. Sticks like hell ! Great cornering ability. Sidewalls sustained considerable abuse (through desert trails with sharp rocks). | | Weaknesses: | Turned out "Wobbly" on mounting. Workshop tried to fix and eventually replaced the tire. Although disconcerting this had no effects on riding. Cannot tell if a mounting issue or a defective tire issue. | | Similar Products Used: | Kenda, Bontrager, WTB, IRC | | Bike Setup: | Klein Adept | | Bottom Line: | A remarkable tire compared to anything I tried so far. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Marc
a
from Maastricht
Date Reviewed: December 15, 2006 | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$30.00 | | Purchased At: | www.hibike.de | | Strengths: | Light, low rolling resistance, very grippy, a lot of control, all year round, very good allrounder. | | Weaknesses: | My old Michelin XRC Mud 2,0 is bigger than the 2,25 Nobby Nick! The 2,1 Nobby Nick looks more like a 1,95 tire! | | Similar Products Used: | Nobby Nick 2,1 first, 2,25 later. Michelin XLS and XRC Mud, Continental Escape. | | Bike Setup: | Specialized Epic, Thompson, Chriss King, XT, DT Swiss 240, Magura Martha, Fox 80 RLT (and I'm 1,69m, 68kg). | | Bottom Line: | I bought the 2,1 tire trough the internet to replace my old Michelin XRC 2,0 (which is a very grippy, fast, confident inspiring allround tire, that only wears very fast,unfortunately). Wrong choice! It's more like a 1,95 tire! The Nobby Nick 2,1 version is fast, very lively, a bit nervous, quite grippy, but it was not as good as all as the Michelins on technical downhills, in mud, on steep uphills, in fast corners.
I replaced it by 2,25's, which feel completely different: they're about as big as the Michelin 2,0's, they weight about the same, they wear less. The 2,25's always feel faster than the Michelins, the knob pattern is a bit less agressive, it's especially noticable on hard pack and rock when it's dry. In light and medium conditions they ride about the same. But when the terrain becomes rough when it's wet and muddy, the Michelins win. Then they offer just that extra bit more traction and control, downhill, steep uphill and cornering.
So: both tires are among the best allrounders for use all year round, for lighter riders. I prefer the Nobby Nick 2,25's during summer, on hardpack. But I'll use a Michelin XRC Mud as a rear tire when it becomes wet and muddy, during winter in rougher terrain.
Forget about the Nobby Nick 2,1's. And think about 2,4's when you're a tall guy, 80+ kg's.
| | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jeff
a Weekend Warrior
from Long Island
Date Reviewed: December 10, 2006 | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Similar Products Used: | Conti VertPro, Schwalbe Fat ALberts | | Bike Setup: | 5 Spot | | Bottom Line: | I was looking for a faster tire than the FA's. These did not dissapoint. They stick everywhere and accelerate much faster. I found myself leaning the bike over so much, I was hitting my pedals on the trail. Did I say they stick everywhere? Just slightly less cushy than the FA's. Great front tire. The back doesn't have quite the grip of the FA's, but they breakaway very slightly then hook right back up.
I was definately riding a few gears up from what I usually do. Very fast in the twisty, between the trees singletrack we have. Good bumb absorption too.
I'm using the 2.25's which are like a fat 2.1.
I'll save the Fat Alberts for Sprain.
| | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Matt
a Cross Country Rider
from Cambridge
Date Reviewed: October 26, 2006 | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$65.00 | | Purchased At: | Cycle Loft, Burlington MA | | Strengths: | Lightweight. Seemed to hook up well enough. Nothing amazing. Hard to review the tire when it didn't last through the third ride. | | Weaknesses: | Overpriced, weak sidewalls. Flatted out on the first ride before mile 1. I assumed the light side wall couldn't handle it. I upped the air pressure to compensate. Bad omen. Third ride while climbing a normal hill that I've climbed a zillion times I got a side wall. Yay. Good bye $65. No help from the customer support department. They said they would give me 25% off a replacement tire. Even after they admitted that next years updated version of the same tire would feature a beefier side wall. The bike shop offered the same. To be fair, the guy at Cycle Loft tried to steer me toward a much cheaper Specialized tire. Should have listened. | | Similar Products Used: | FirePro XC (reliable and back on the above bike), Kenda Nevagal (good tire), Hutchinson mosquito (good when new wears quickly) | | Bike Setup: | Ellsworth ISIS, Marzocchi Atom 100, Mavic wheels, SRAM XO, Hayes, XT cranks | | Bottom Line: | Stay away from this tire it may be light but who cares if you are patching the tube or worse fixing the sidewall. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Fras
a Weekend Warrior
from Scotland
Date Reviewed: October 4, 2006 | | Favoriate Trail: | Glentress Spooky Woods | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$60.00 | | Purchased At: | ebay | | Strengths: | Massive grip, lightweight, fast rolling | | Weaknesses: | not quite as comfy as the 2.35 high rollers they replaced | | Similar Products Used: | Maxxis High rollers, panaracer fire xc, tioga extreme xc | | Bike Setup: | Kona dawg matic 2004 with tons of upgrades. fox van 130 fork, 5th element rear shock, dt swiss 5.1d rims, sram pg990, sdg bel air blue camo (sweet saddle) +++++ | | Bottom Line: | have been using these for about a month now on black and red trails at glentress. found them to have awesome grip on all singletrack, jumps etc in both wet and dry weather. havnt tried on rock yet in wet but mostly running singeltrack trails anyway. these are much lighter than the high rollers saving about a pound in weight but you lose some comfort when landing jumps. this is made up for by the supreme fast rolling and climbing ability coupled with great grip on the downs through berms etc. awesome product. also check out ebay and action sport.de in germany. picked these up for half the price than the uk retail price. kaaaachiiiing. gets five flaming turds all round but no way would i be forking out £38.99 a pop for any tire. thank you ebay | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Lars
a Cross Country Rider
from Norway
Date Reviewed: September 27, 2006 | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$55.00 | | Purchased At: | cyclecomponents.com | | Strengths: | This is a follow up, from my last review. | | Bottom Line: | Yesterday I was out riding with some friends using Intense system 4. We all had the same amount of problems on wet rock. I suppose I was too sceptical in my last review... | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Lars
a Cross Country Rider
from Norway
Date Reviewed: September 20, 2006 | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$55.00 | | Purchased At: | cyclecomponents.com | | Strengths: | Light. Excellent grip in most conditions. | | Weaknesses: | Thin sidewalls.
Not that good on wet rock. | | Similar Products Used: | IRC Mythos II 1.95. | | Bike Setup: | Marin hardtail. XT crankset. Avid Juicy Carbon disc-brakes. Schwalbe Nobby Nic 2.25. | | Bottom Line: | I'm very pleased with these tires. They are a good compromise between weight (580 grams) and grip.
The weight savings comes partly from fewer rubber knots which make them slippy on wet rocks (Mythos is better), and partly from tinner sidewalls. A friend of mine had the sidewalls torn up on a rock.
Next time I'm probably going for Intense system 4 or Schwalbe Big Betty, Goofy Gluey.
They are almost perfect, thats why I only give them four chills. (they are 4,5) | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Graham
a Weekend Warrior
from Christchurch, New Zealand
Date Reviewed: August 20, 2006 | | Favoriate Trail: | Croesus Knob | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$45.00 | | Purchased At: | Hub Cyclery, Christchurch | | Strengths: | Incredible Grip, Very Lightweight, Very Stable, Predictable Cornering in all conditions, Fast accelleration. | | Weaknesses: | None so far | | Similar Products Used: | Nokian Gazzaloddi, Maxxis High Roller / Mobster, Geax Blade 225, Tioga Factory, Continental Vertical Pro | | Bike Setup: | Santa Cruz Heckler, RS Pike 454 Air, Nobby Nic 2.25 | | Bottom Line: | Came recommended by LBS. I was previously running 2.35 High Rollers / Gazzaloddi Duals on the Heckler. Found the Gazzaloddis gave great mud and soft condition grip but were unpredictable on hardpack and gravel - felt unstable at speed due to wide spacing of knobs. High Rollers were also good in hardpack, but lacked grip in the wet.
The Nobby Nics grip is incredible in all conditions, and reduction in tread width was not noticeable. Bike feels far faster, more stable and predictable than before. Also significantlty lighter at 595g per tyre compared to 850g+ for the others, therefore shaved about a pound off the bike weight.
Well worth the extra $$ | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
ron burgundy
a Racer
from fall city washington
Date Reviewed: June 18, 2006 | | Favoriate Trail: | any tight, fast stuff | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Strengths: | hooks up constantly
reliable
bites like rabid racoon on your leg when you walk out in the morning to get your paper | | Weaknesses: | nnnnnnnnoooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnneeeeeeeeeeeeeee | | Bike Setup: | kona kula supreme pimped w/crossmax sl's | | Bottom Line: | this tires are true off road rocking! do yourself a favor and bite the large price that these tires cost due from being imported from germany and get ready for some hardcore for those about to ride BC DC off road rocking in any condition! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
joe dirte'
a Weekend Warrior
from hazzard co
Date Reviewed: June 5, 2006 | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$90.00 | | Purchased At: | bicycle jones | | Strengths: | size to weight ratio, tall knobs, tough casing, can lean waaayy over before these tires slide out, ride much smoother than the knobs would suggest | | Weaknesses: | little squirmy in the loose soil (to be expected with my weight and the amount of pressure I use) a little pricey | | Similar Products Used: | Hutchinson Pythons until they'd dumped over in a turn 1 too many times | | Bike Setup: | Marin FS rig, CK hubs, DT rims, CK headset, XTR, Juicy 5's, Thomson stem & post, blah, blah, blah | | Bottom Line: | My local shop recommended these to me and I'm glad because they've allowed me to have much more confidence in the turns especially compared to the Pythons. I've cleared a few obstacles that were d#$@ hard to get over before. These tires bite the trail. Braking seemed to be more predictable also. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kodiak
a Cross Country Rider
from Germany
Date Reviewed: April 18, 2006 | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Purchased At: | Canyon | | Bike Setup: | XC Fully (top end) | | Bottom Line: | so, here is my longer than expected "systematic" review:
DOWN:
(softcore) fast Downhill:
acceleration: 5/5
deceleration 5/5
speed: 5/5
grip: 4/5
control [the effect of your actions]: 4/5
stability [the behaviour of the tire]: 4/5
Speeds up and breaks really fast. Directional control in
faster sections could be better.
Technical Downhill:
acceleration: 5/5
deceleration 4.5/5
speed: 5/5
grip: 3.5/5
control: 3.5/5
stability: 3.5/5
Because of its acceleration the grip and control in more
difficult sections are a little limited. The tire could
have a little more grip on its sides to get you out of
"holes".
Gravel:
acceleration: 5/5
deceleration 5/5
speed: 5/5
grip: 3.5/5
control: 3.5/5
stability: 3.5/5
Huuh, it gets really fast here - but be careful, the tires
start to "swim" in soft gravel if running on higher speeds.
Still, braking (decel., control, stability) works fine!
Road:
acceleration: 5/5
deceleration 5/5
speed: 5/5
grip: 5/5
control: 5/5
stability: 5/5
Well, I really don't use roads often but I think its
possible kick some road-race-bikers a**es ;-) (at least on
surpise)
UP:
Technical Uphill:
acceleration & speed: 5/5
grip: 4.5/5
control: 5/5
stability: 4/5
Stay in your saddle! This one takes you up even on the
steepest sections...
Again, a little more grip on its sides would be great and
on gravel sections the grip could be a little better.
deep Mud/more extreme uphill:
acceleration & speed: 4/5
grip: 3.5/5
control: 3.5/5
stability: 4/5
Still a good tire, but here you pay the price for its race
element - If it gets too deep & dirty, you have to test the
profile of your shoes... - And because of the lack of side
grip it's harder to leave (?)rain grooves(? or whatever you
call Spurrillen in english).
The real bottom line:
This is a GREAT "ALLROUND" TIRE with a tendency for RACE AND XC use - its qualities in technical sections are better than I expected and even though some guys of you would laugh about what I call "downhill", I think this tire has its "off-road" qualities - But it is NOT A TIRE FOR HARDCORE DOWNHILLING OR ENDURO.
The Sum is a 4.4, but I round it up to 5 so that anybody reads this crap... ;-) | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
| |
|
Photo Caption Contest
(sponsored by Maxxis)
|
Enter here
|
|
|
