| |
Submitted by
Chris
a Cross Country Rider
from Connecticut
Date Reviewed: April 29, 2008 | | Favoriate Trail: | Black Mtn, Canberra Australia | | Duration Product Used: | 2 Years | | Price Paid: |
$900.00 | | Strengths: | Sexy bike - decent components, decent suspension, in its day, it was a great all-round cross country bike for singletrack, etc. | | Weaknesses: | Spongy suspension - the Indy XC are OK for singletrack, but like any elastomer shock they have weaknesses with heavy duty terrain. The rear RST shock is adequate at best for regular cross-country. This is NOT a downhill bike!! | | Similar Products Used: | Schwinn Rocket Comp 2005; GT iDrive 5 1.0 2006. | | Bike Setup: | GT iDrive 5 1.0 XT/XTR Fox | | Bottom Line: | For a 1997 bike, this was a great cross-country rig for the beginner/intermediate level rider. I loved my ATX-970 and was sorry to sell it - but today's bikes offer better value for money and performance. Look what $900-$1200 buys you today? XT/XTR group sets and quality brakes and suspension. Still, in '97 this was a great rig! | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris Stewart
a Weekend Warrior
from Calgary, AB, Canada
Date Reviewed: August 20, 2003 | | Favoriate Trail: | Canada Olimpic Park | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1300.00 | | Purchased At: | Speed Cycle | | Strengths: | The Fact that this FS is the second one I've ever bought,i'd have to say the Shimano XTR brakes I've put on are a big help on the long hauls or steep hills. And the fact that the 1.75 tires i've put on can rip around on gravel with no sliding. | | Weaknesses: | The weakness of this bike I have to say, is the Front and rear RST shocks it came with. I've had this bike for about 5 to 6 years now, and I've blowen both of them from constaint every day riding. Also the Lower Bottom Bracket could have been stronger, I've bent and broken too many to add up. | | Bike Setup: | Mavic Rims, Shimano XTR V Brakes in the rear, and reg Shim V's in the front, I've got a Axiom handle bar which decreased weight, MegaBite Tires that are only 1.75's. Cateye speedometer. | | Bottom Line: | This Giant of a bike stands up to it's name. I've never been able to do some of the things this bike allows me to accomplish with ease. If anyone would like to purchase my Giant I will gladly sell it to you with all the upgrades I've given it for a low cost of $850.oo/CAN . Also a great bike for raceing as it is for jumping or railing. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kyle G
a Weekend Warrior
from Southlake
Date Reviewed: April 2, 2002 | | Favoriate Trail: | Northshore | | Duration Product Used: | 2 Years | | Price Paid: |
$350.00 | | Purchased At: | from a friend | | Strengths: | strong sterdy frame, easy shifting, and most of all a solid ride with very litte bounce (no matter what setting you have it on). Easyly took on "Devals Backbone" (harded trail in Texas). | | Weaknesses: | crank shaft does squeek during the summer. RockShock USA Indy C was good while it lasted but shockes are starting to go dead from long rides and contunious use. | | Bike Setup: | Upgraded to 26' by 2.3', and clipless petals | | Bottom Line: | This bike is good all around it could take whatever i could give it, It holds up in every condition, (even in the sand of Texas, where it is hard to find a bike to go throught it easily). A perfect overall bike for the experenced rider. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jeremy Powell
a Racer
from Nevada City, CA
Date Reviewed: March 11, 2001 | | Favoriate Trail: | Donner Ski ranch Race course | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$800.00 | | Purchased At: | Samurai Mountain Bikes | | Strengths: | Fairly Light, its a Giant, durable, cheap | | Weaknesses: | none | | Similar Products Used: | Old giant Rincon, | | Bike Setup: | 2001 Giant NRS 1 | | Bottom Line: | This was a great bike. It was my first suspended bike, and served me well for 5 years. The last two years I raced on it and won quite a few with it. Never any problems with it, great price, and isnt too heavy. Good entry level race bike, even though it isnt made any more. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mark
a Weekend Warrior
from Toronto Canada
Date Reviewed: February 17, 2001 | | Favoriate Trail: | Three rocks | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$900.00 | | Purchased At: | Bay Cycle | | Strengths: | - Excellent minimal "bob" design.
- Durable finish
- Fairly strong welds | | Weaknesses: | Bushings at main and all pivot points. Why didn't
they spec. bearings? | | Similar Products Used: | - FSR
- Wheeler 5000 CZX
| | Bike Setup: | Manitou SX LT 100, Helix Expert shock, full XT, VP 135 pedals. | | Bottom Line: | I love this bike. I've upgraded pretty much everything
except wheels and hubs. The SX 100 and Helix Expert are
a huge step up from the Indy C-LT and RST 22 it came with.
But... these were great to start riding with as a FS beginner.
I've measure a full 4" of front and rear travel (Helix eye- to-eye lenght is 185mm). Bottom bracket height is 13.7".
The geometry and new clearance are great for the type of riding I do, XC and "light free ride" (4-5 foot drops are all we have around here).
The bike weighs 27.5 lbs and feels really solid in every
situation. Giant should have continued with this basic
design, it works well and has held up great after three years of bashing and crashing. My ride weight is about 210 lbs. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ste cruy2k
a Weekend Warrior
from Wolverhampton.
Date Reviewed: November 18, 2000 | | Favoriate Trail: | Secret!!!! | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Price Paid: |
$1000.00 | | Purchased At: | Two wheels | | Strengths: | Strong frame, cool components. | | Weaknesses: | rear drop out keeps snapping, rear shock is a little stiff! | | Similar Products Used: | ddg shooter
giant box1
gt lts5000
giant warp ds3000 | | Bike Setup: | DH planet-x bars, ddg stem, marzocchi jt DH forks, dmr v8 pedals, tioga DH seat/tyres 2.1 DH, Mr controll DH device, rst22 rear shock!! FUNKY ROX STICKERS | | Bottom Line: | Smart bike for allround use, but could do with a few gussets on the front. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dean
a Cross Country Rider
from Slovenia
Date Reviewed: October 15, 2000 | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$750.00 | | Purchased At: | local GIANT dealer | | Strengths: | light for full suspension bike, frame | | Weaknesses: | Rock Shox Jet T2 fork - maybe I am to heavy (85 kg), when jumping higher than 30 cm it bottoms to quickly, for a ride on not to rough trail it performs quite nice. | | Similar Products Used: | GT karrakoram, GT xcr 2000, Giant mcm2 | | Bike Setup: | SRAM 7.0 grip shift, Shimano Alivio V brakes, DNM AO-1 AR rear shock, Rock Shox Judy XC | | Bottom Line: | I have bought 1999 model at sell out at local Giant dealer. Price was nice and I felt very comfortable riding it on a test drive. I have driven hardtails and front suspension bikes and I have found that this bike meets all my needs.
I think that ATX 970 is perfect solution for XC bike rider.
After replacement of front suspension (Judy XC) I have not found any need for further upgrading.
Bike works just perfect. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Trevor Z
a Downhiller
from White Rock, British Columbia, Canada
Date Reviewed: September 22, 2000 | | Favoriate Trail: | Whistler Joyride | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$350.00 | | Purchased At: | Consignment store | | Strengths: | Light light light
| | Weaknesses: | weak downtube | | Similar Products Used: | 99 Brodie Brat | | Bike Setup: | powertools risers, indy C, v-brakes, xt all around. | | Bottom Line: | this bike is cheap, light, and not designed for downhill at all. i think it would make an excellent bike for XC, because of the limited travel. the rear and front shocks are a little too stiff for me, as i am 15 and weigh only 120. I broke the downtube in 6 months, but i raced downhill twice during that period. it works for XC well, but if intend to freeride aggresivly DO NOT BUY THIS BIKE. instead buy something with a reinforced head tube. i give it 4 burning bar-ends. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Robert
a Weekend Warrior
from Atlanta, GA
Date Reviewed: December 29, 1999 | | Favoriate Trail: |
umbstead, nc | | Duration Product Used: |
1 Year | | Strengths: |
Mine is a '98 model. As such, I was able to get it for $650.00 new!
I have found the suspension to be highly configurable to suit all types of riding. The suspension can be adjusted without any tools. I have thrashed this bike and it has not given me any troubles at all. | | Weaknesses: |
Some components are not as cool as they could possibly be but who cares. If you are that concerned with having the best of everything, get ready to tripple the price. I'll be satisfied with second best for a third of the price. | | Similar Products Used: |
Raleigh $500 model- no suspension (can't remember the exact name)
Performance $500 model- no suspension | | Bike Setup: |
stock | | Bottom Line: | The 2000 and 1999 models are considerably different. They have added primo components at a primo price which is way out of my range. If you can find a '98, it shouldn't cost more than $700.00. At that price, this bike is a steal! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ashes
a Downhiller
from Perth, West Australia
Date Reviewed: September 27, 1999 | | Favoriate Trail: |
Goat Farm | | Duration Product Used: |
2 Years | | Strengths: |
Durability - getting close to 3 years with no major problems
ride - stable, climbs and descends well
wheelset - bloody light for a production bike and has held up to downhill races, bmx track etc with no problems
drivetrain - LX has held together well aprt from rear derialeur
v-brakes | | Weaknesses: |
Judy C - bushings knackered (acceptable after 2-3 years I guess) and too much compression and rebound damping
RST rear shock - too much compression and rebound damping and generally unrefined action | | Similar Products Used: |
ATX 970 | | Bike Setup: |
Koolstop brake pads
Ameoba DH bar
Scary Parts Adjustable Stem
Spuds
Oury Grips | | Bottom Line: | This is an update of my earlier review
bought the bike in 97 and still happy with it
in the future an upgrade to the rear shock (vaniller RC or Pro Deluxe) is on the cards, a 2000 Judy XC is a definate future upgrade | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ales
a Weekend Warrior
from Slovenia
Date Reviewed: May 18, 1999 | | Favoriate Trail: |
Alps | | Duration Product Used: |
6 months | | Strengths: |
Stiff, good front fork, nice design, easy to handle, good value for money, | | Weaknesses: |
BB shit me, LBS had to repair it
RST22 to stiff, LBS managed to soften it, since than much better, that's what I need!
Personlly I don't like much grip shifts | | Similar Products Used: |
Just hardtail and rigid bikes, no similar FS | | Bike Setup: |
Moso comp front shock, RST 22 rear,diacompe 757 V brakes,STX RC front and SRAM 7,0 rear derailleurs, STX RC hubI changed cassettes to SACHS 12-32, easier to climb what I do a lot, changed pedals to SPD M 545 - this upgrade is very recommended! | | Bottom Line: | I shifted from old rigid to FS and what a improvement! With some changes this bike is what I need. Great bike for price and you can't go wrong, | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
P Davis
a Weekend Warrior
from Sewell, NJ USA
Date Reviewed: April 28, 1999 | | Favoriate Trail: |
any uphill singletrack | | Duration Product Used: |
less than 1 month | | Strengths: |
Just bought last weekend . Outstanding brakes, stability at speed and rock crawling, crisp shifting and plush suspension! | | Weaknesses: |
Toe clips suck, cranks creak alot and back tire was mounted in reverse.
Only one water bottle mount- why did Giant bother to put mount screws under shock?! And what the heck is a BB? Someone tell me! | | Similar Products Used: |
Klein full suspensions and Klein hardtails. | | Bike Setup: |
Still running stock :( | | Bottom Line: | I am very impressed with this bike- I ride motocross ( real serious dirt riding!) and this is a good trainer ! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ian (ITY)
a Weekend Warrior
from Stourbridge (UK)
Date Reviewed: April 27, 1999 | | Favoriate Trail: |
??? Severe, looking for it still | | Duration Product Used: |
3 months | | Strengths: |
Awesome design, If you dream about Rocky Mountain Element, but can't afford one - TRY THIS - I've ridden BOTH. The ATX frame is unbreakable - my local LBS (Lee) did a five foot drop on mine - no problem. Chuckability - FIVE STAR. Get some good pedals (DMR V8 etc) and you will have all the confidence you'll need. I've done downhill on the southdowns (Devils Dyke) with this bike and it takes it (more than I can). Forget your fancy psuedo monocoques or fancy URT's, this is a classic double diamond design with plenty of scope. There is a mismatch between the RST Mozo Comps (Fr Forks) and the RST 22 rear. But it's not so bad. This bike can take IT. I have Tioga XC rubber all round (recommended). Want to get extreme technical? YES this frame does it! Go for those Mission-Impossible downhill low speed drops - IT WORKS. I paid 500 sterling - AWESOME. But, upgrade the bits you interface with (saddle, pedals (GO DMR V8-V12). Fully Recomended (for the money - lets be realistic). GO GIANT ATX (98 only). One last point - get the rear coil-over spring rate right. Mine shipped with a 450lb - too heavy for me - I'm now on a 400lb - much better. If your ramping-up your pre-load then sod-off and get a hard tail. USE the suspension - get a lower spring rate. | | Weaknesses: |
RST 22 - Over rated rebound valving - too slow - maybe??? Replace it with something that can be adjusted. This bike needs less rebound damping (rear only). Too slow on the rear - unless you like it that way. The front? GREAT but I like low damping on the front - I love the Mozo Comps, but they do take on water so service regular. Oh yea, the BB is shit, replace with a good bearing set. | | Similar Products Used: |
Rocky Mountain Element (Full-on no-expense spared) | | Bike Setup: |
ATX 970 upgraded with 400lb spring (450 STD), DMR V8 pedals, Tioga Factory XC tyres (Michelin STD), flat bars replaced with riser Bars (REC). | | Bottom Line: | If your prepared to spend a little money on this bike, you'll get a great reward. It's not perfect, but the basic design is GOLD. The suspension layout is more than workable - get that rear spring rate sorted! It's essential. How does it feel? ALIVE (and confident). BEST BUDGET BUY - A Classic!!! Oh yea - It jumps REAL WELL! Two Wheels of Stourbridge, still have a couple in stock. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
MRT
a Weekend Warrior
from Toronto
Date Reviewed: April 12, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
6 months | | Strengths: |
- Price. $800 CDN
- Good groupo for $ STX-RC all around, INDY C-Long Travel, WTB speedmasters & Primals mounted reversed (which seem to hook-up well in anything once reversed). Then again my last bike was a fat pig... | | Weaknesses: |
A little heavy, but again for an $800.CDN full suspension it's not bad. | | Bottom Line: | A great step up from a hard tail for a weekend warrior who wants to have a blast, but doesn't want to drop a few grand. There are better FS bikes, but I haven't seen one in this price range
anywhere that could match the 970. Five! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
ctr
a downhiller
from australia
Date Reviewed: February 1, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
We have a few BIG 5 kits (970+990) left which are easily fitted and give 5 of rear travel. Theses are aound $80.00 in australia plus p+h. These are precision machined and come with fitting and tuning instructions. Ring 015791541 and ask for Garry. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Hely
a weekend warrior
from Australia
Date Reviewed: January 24, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
got this bike for nearly a year now. wasn't very happy with the rst rear suspension. far too stiff even with a weaker spring.
just installed the ATX 5 linkage plates from ctr (crash test research).
what a difference!!!! so plush and smooth now.
now the bike deserves five chillies!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Damo
a weekend warrior
from Australia
Date Reviewed: January 21, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
I own a 1999 ATX970 and can not believe how mad this bike is, it totally rips. Extreame value for money. This bike gets thrashed big time, lots of jumping.
So far its held up great no real problems. OK now that I have raved on how good the bike is I will say that the stx front derailleur is noisey ( very average, bordering shit), stx rc brakes are OK quiet but they are geting sloppy (typical), lx rear deralleur no problems at all actually I think it works great, STX RC cranks FLEX. , judy c go off totally, same can be said for the AO-1 rear air shock, The ZAC 19 rims are lasting longer than I thought, after constant weeks of jumping they only now need slight trueing, The frame and suspension setup is the best I have seen. Up hills, down hills, cross country and jumping this bike does it all with ease. I am extreamly critical but opened minded about all moutain bikes and I can honestly say the ATX970 is very good value for money but to make this bike as good as it should be you will want to upgrade the brakes to Avid 2.0, and upgrade the front derailleur and cranks, This will improve the bike considerably. ALL THINGS EQUAL THE GIANT HAS IT ALL VALUE AND PERFORMANCE, FIVE STEAMING TURDS!!!!PS It comes with Michelin Wild Grippers, SHIT HOT | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Daniel Miller
a downhiller
from Australia
Date Reviewed: January 20, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
The atx 970 is the first full suspention bike I have owned. The bike it self is excellent for the price. I was lucky enough to get the bike for $1215 Australian at an end of year sale. I have never had any problems with it. It is perfect for an beginner down hiller and is also perfect for going on long rides on the rodes aswell. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ben Warren
a weekend warrior
from Tasmania, Australia
Date Reviewed: January 7, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
The ATX 970 is by far the best bike I have ever owned. I upgraded the front shock to an RST 461 DH and combined with the RST 56 rear shock the bike tracks perfectly over all types of terrain. If you are looking for a reasonably chaep full suspension bike to thrash over the trails with a minimal amount of service, the ATX 970 would be the bike to purchase. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Rick
a weekend warrior
from Japan
Date Reviewed: December 13, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I've read most of the reviews on this bike and would like to say this is one of the best bikes you WILL find for the price. I bought my '98 970 about ten months ago (Japanese Model) and have not had a single problem. The Japan version is slightly different than the US or International. My bike weighed less than 30 lbs (12.6Kg)off the shelf, had STX-RC all round, Indy XC forks and GIANT rear sus. After a couple days adjusting, I found the bike rode very smooth and was easy to control. I Ride with some more experienced riders, all of whom have more expensive bikes (ProFlex Beast/GT FS/Specialized FSR/Cannondale SuperV)they all have ridden my GIANT and agree that it is a great bike for the price. I have made some mods and would suggest to anyone with a 970 that you feel out the bike thoroughly. Rims, I chose Mavic 221 with Parralax LX hubs. V-Brakes, my 970 came with STX-RC, they work fine but I'm going to buy XT levers with LX brakes. Deraillers, XT. I also changed the handlebar to a shorter one and upgraded to GripShifters. I enjoy this bike and it has held up well. An outstanding bike for the price. With the Conversion rate from US$ to Yen, I paid $620 | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris
a weekend warrior
from Canberra, Oz.
Date Reviewed: October 26, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
After many test rides, and with a budget of about $1400AUS, I was lucky enough to find a '98 ATX970 on special at the shop. After a test ride, I decided to buy it, and man am I glad I did!Although I've test ridden many other full-suspension bikes, the only other full suspension bike I've spent time on was my mate's GT LTS-3. In my perfectly unbiased opinion (...) the ATX 970 is a better bike in all respects, with the exception of weight. The 970 is a heavy bike. Mine is a stocker (ie. full STX-RC components, + Water bottle, pump, etc.), and you notice every one of those 30lbs when climbing.However, this is the only thing I can complain about, and maybe I should just build up my legs a bit (another excuse to ride...). The thing is an absolute hoot to ride, it handles beautifully, but like anything it takes a little getting used to. The STX-RC is perfectly adequate for the average trailburner - although the front Derailleur/Crankset combo sucks turds. Still, it does the job if it isn't asked to do the impossible, and is maintained properly. The rear clunks a bit, but again it does an adequate job, and you get what you pay for with componentry. Oh, and my BB is starting to click... i'll let the shop know and they can replace the damn thing before it shits itself up Black Mtn or Majura or somewhere. Geez, that thing must be made of playdough or something.The Indy C LT is a good shock for a beginner/amatuer, but it can give surprises. It did a pogo-stick impression on me on my first ride, putting me over the bars, but stiffening them up helped. As my riding improves, I am beginning to feel flex in the arms, and some resulting stiction at *bad* times. Will soon be time to upgrade I think. Still, not a bad fork for the bike to begin with.The rear shock? Well mine has the RST thing, with the thread adjustable preload. People bag this thing, I've heard and read of stiction, no rebound, poor reliability, etc.. Mine is bloody fantastic! It does it's job well. It is quite stiff, but running at a lower preload it still provides a nice feel. My mates have suggested I upgrade, but that can wait I think, at least until it breaks or begins to play up.So, with my bike I will probably upgrade to either an LX or XT '98 model groupset, depending on my finances. Not really necessary (except that damn front Derailleur etc.), but might save a pound or two, and I get 3 more gears (whoopee!). After that, either a Judy XC LT or an RST Mozo 3.5/4.5 front fork (depending again on finances and the damn Ozzie dollar...). After that? Well, I dunno. Ride it until it dies I guess, which judging from current experience could be a long time...I would thoroughly reccomend this rig, especially as an entry level full-suspension. BUY ONE NOW! :) | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
goat boy
a weekend warrior
from Sheffield, England
Date Reviewed: October 20, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
You can look at this thing two ways: 1. A bendable ( if you're a meaty fat non-uphill f***er like many of you seem to be) but inexpensive bit of machinery or 2. A lovely bombproof frame well worth upgrading with for e.g. 217/221's , dx v's, dh risers, 90mm stem , bmx pedals, goldtec sus linkages , waveys, coda seat.Sorry, haven't managed to break BB or the derailleurs as yet, i must be of unconventional sexual inclination or something. Its fairly light considering the componentry, and the v. good value mozo comps have prevented me from landing on my face from 2 vertical metre airs in the past (maybe i should just learn how to jump properly). Gimme some bomber z1's and i can die happy. Shit , the bike just doubled in price...f*** it. 969 years of thrashing left. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Nick hagen
a cross-country rider
from Lake Forest, California
Date Reviewed: October 20, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I found a 970 in a local store for U.S.$749. It's lime green with yellow rear suspension. Contrary to the posts below, it has a Manitou Spyder-R front shock, i'm not sure of the rear one. I'm not sure if this bike is worth getting. There seems to be a lot of problems with the bottom bracket and the pivot points listed in the posts below. I will be riding 90% XC with some races/fun rides. You know the kind, it's supposed to be a fun ride but you end up dicing with the people nearest you for miles on end. If anyone can supply me with additional info or reasons why I should go ahead and purchase this bike, please email me at nhagen1@home.com. Thanks.
Nick | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Nori
a weekend warrior
from Saitama, Japan
Date Reviewed: September 9, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have had my '98 ATX 970 for about 5 months now. I have replaced with Panaracer Mach SS tires for front and rear, Selle stratos saddle, and MountainSpeed springs (soft, up to 145 lb) for stock Indy C LT. I shortened the handle bar by one inch both sides. The small modifications made the bike so different. Now I'm very satisfied with the bike. After two months ride, BB gave out small noise but it was overhauled by the local bike shop where I purchased the bike and it's working well now. No other trouble at all.The stock STX-RC V-breaks and shifter are good enough for me. Fun to ride. I recommend the bike for anyone who starts mountain biking.
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jennifer Aniston
a downhiller
from Friends
Date Reviewed: September 2, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Thongs,
They feel right when thy are right up my arse. They are comfortable when getting fingered as well.
Wonder bra's are great too. !!!!!!!!!!aaaaaaa aaaaaaa aaaaaa aaa aa a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaa sddkfpsdk[g fgbkesro;jkL:AEGkmszl/gr ewfpjpoawje weofjpwiaefja vlwijfpwokfpn;as pewrkojopgfwjkfopaw sawopjfpoawj wjfopisjdf fwhfiwavwa vw9uef09wehjfc we9ufw9eijfwe fwae9iuf9wefjc weppdfjwe fcwe dqw;djkopwejkd; | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Miles Thorold-Smith
a weekend warrior
from Hobart
Date Reviewed: August 7, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
This review is a sort of 12 month review for the bikeRight then, lets look back at the year that was I bought this bike and was very happy with it for a while. Then the seat started to shit me but I put up with it.BB gave out after 2 and a 1/2 months,got it replaced.That was an easy fix. The seat was still annoying me so eventually I bought a WTB SST with lovely kevlar edges (yellow to match my RST Mozo 3.5's)Remember kids, colour matching is fun!
I have tried various tire combinations and have recently been very happy with a IRC Missile on the front and a Tioga Factory DH on the rear.But all is not happy in the land of traction.I think i'll change the rear to a Hutchinson On The Rocks.
Anyway I got kind of bored with riding around on about 3 inches of travel so i bought the CTR Big 5 linkage plates and everything was peachy.
I despise the term freeride but that is how my bike is turning out. Long(ish) travel, big tires, risers and an all up weight of a bit over 30 pounds. I'm not really happy with the weight but it was mostly my fault.As for the bike, absolutley flawless. I love it to death and apart from folding the odd wheel it has been very safe and economical.
To sum up, very good frame that last well so far.
If you are thinking of buying this bike here are some tips I have learned and i hope you will heed them wisely1) Put some decent contact points on it ie:comfortable seat,good tires,comfy grips and good pedals. It will make riding so much more fun.
2) Ditch the bottom bracket as it is a complete and utter mechanical child of satan
3) Maybe put more travel up the back but that's a personal preference.
4) Go and ride it very hard from sun up to sun down (or even longer if you have a light).
5) Collapse exhausted as you realise that you made a perfect choice of bicycling partner.
6) Repeat step 4 for as long a your body will take it.
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Climbmaster
a
from All over the world
Date Reviewed: July 29, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Well, what can I say. I have a Giant ATX 980 and it rules. CU92 provides an excellent base for a stiff chassis. The rear suspension is on the stiff side, but it never bobs, evn on climbs, which I do a lot. The Judy C is quite plush and takes all shocks well. Shimano componentry can't be beat and the bu=ike shifts very well.Giant is the largest quality bicycle company in the world, bigger than Trek and Cannondale. Its bikes are state of the art and there's a Giant for every type of rider. It's also a Taiwanese company. I would like to point out that THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH 'MADE IN TAIWAN' and there is still a minority of people out there who will not give up their unfounded prejudice about Taiwanese products. Lots of bikes and components are made in Taiwan, such as Giant, Specialized, GT, Schwinn, SRAM/Gripshift, RST, Velo and Wellgo. They are all EXCELLENT products. I'm sure most will agree with me.Two thunbs up for Giant!!! Since I can't select 6 chillies, I'll settle for 5. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Andres Byrne
a weekend warrior
from Adelaide, Australia
Date Reviewed: June 27, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I think the Giant ATX 980 is the best bike for its price by far. I think a lot of these dumb#&%$@ are not taking into account this bikes price. I have had mine for ten months, weigh 90kg and there has been no problem. The rock shox deluxe rear holds up beautifully and after riding it full tilt down some absouloutley CRAZY downhill tracks I haven't found one single problem. The only changes I have made is to buy a new riser bar. This bike absouloutly rocks and I reccomend everyone that wants a great X-Country/Downhill duallie should buy this bike. Eventhouygh it dosn't come with the best components I think some of those try hard dick pulls should get some decent bike skills before theyu start bagging this great bike. I deserves every steaming hot pepper. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dave
a cross-country rider
from Pennsylvania
Date Reviewed: June 7, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have a 98 Giant ATX 970, I love it. I realize the old 97 model is terrible but this years model is so nice. I replaced the rear shock with a Vanilla Air Fox shock and have a Spyder R front shock. It is plush, comfortable, it is ok at uphill, and fantastic at downhill. I am going to change the hubs, brakes and definitely the components, XT is the way to go. But as of yet I have not one complaint of this bike. It handles well, it is well balanced, the only thing desired is to shave off some of the weight of the bike. Those who complain about this bike are wrong and should realize that this bike isn't pro material and not meant for downhill. IT IS A CROSS COUNTRY BIKE!!! If you want a downhill bike, get a Ventana Matador. As I have said before, this bike kicks ass. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Todd
a weekend warrior
from Vancouver, Canada
Date Reviewed: June 3, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
First of all, Bob you're an idiot. Take this bike for what it is, it's an entry level beginners bike, not some downhillers, hard-core dream bike.
My girlfriend bought this bike about 2 months ago it has performed very well and has helped me to make up my mind on whether or not to buy a full suspension bike. I will.
She paid only $700Cdn which is about $500US, so despite a few problems with it:
-I'm sure a brick would be more comfortable then the supplied seat = 1st upgrade
-RST22 is a very stiff shock, I'm only 140 and I figure that I only use about half the available travel, and that's hammering pretty hard. My buddy is 180 and it is just about right for him. Not a great spec on a small frame.
-Same problem with the Indy C as the with the shock, way too stiff. Again, not good on a small frame.Overall I would rate this bike a four, with better shock and new springs up front, definitely a five on performance alone. But thanks to that killer deal it gets 5 flaming poodle turds. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
BOB
a racer
from
Date Reviewed: May 29, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
THIS BIKE WAS OK NEXT TO MY 1500$ SPICIALLIZED DOWNHILLER. ACTUALL COMPARED TO ALL YOU GUYS I GIVE IT A 2/5. I THINK THAT IF YOU HAVE GIVEN IT MORE THAN THAT YOU AREN/T A REAL HARD-COAR BIKER. THIS BIKE SUCKS IF YOU ARE TRYING TO MAKE THE BIG TIMES, OR JUST GOING OUT FOR A NORMAL AND COMFORTABLE RIDE. | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bob
a cross-country rider
from Canada
Date Reviewed: May 24, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have had my '98 ATX 970 for about two months now. When I purchased it I had the Bike Shop replace the Indy C with a Judy XC LT, and had them order a Coupe Deluxe to replace the RST-22 it back. I rode for a while with the RST-22 because it took about a month to get the Coupe Deluxe in. The Judy was comfortable, but not super plush (that's OK because I've owned a Judy on my last bike and was satisfied with its performance). The RST in back was stiff, even with practically no preload on the spring. With the Coupe Deluxe now in place, the back seems more plush, although the rear end is not as supple as some full suspension designs. As for the rest of the bike, so far the only trouble I've had has been with a creaking bottom bracket that was fixed by the local bike shop where I purchased the Giant.Overall, I am very happy with this bike, as it provides a very comfortable ride (more so than my Trek 930 SHX w/judy XC and Hydrapost). The frame seems very robust. This is my first full suspension rig (although I've road a Specialized FS), but I think it is a great ride, and for the money a great buy (especially with the upgrades I mentioned above (less than $1600 CAN in total w/upgrades!) | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Franky
a weekend warrior
from Perth, West Australia
Date Reviewed: May 18, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Further comment (last post 30 MArch): My RST 22 depressurised some weeks ago & I've been waiting for 3 weeks to get it back. OK, it had to be rebuilt because of piston damage, but 3 WEEKS!!? General comments have been There's nothing wrong with RST except the sticker on it. I must agree. The shock performs OK, but RST servicing leaves a lot to be desired. If you want a bike to ride, not look at while it's being fixed, don't buy this bike. Please, Giant, review your component mix... dump RST for someone reliable. A bike is no good when it takes so much time to repair when it breaks. I'd give it one star, but it's good when I can ride it! Check out the posting from mad penguine (UK). Looks like Giant cares little for after-sales service.
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Andrew Nickle
a
from weekend warrior
Date Reviewed: April 25, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I really like the atx 970 97model. It suites me very well. I've replaced the brakes with v-brakes,and I have Rock shox S.I.D on their. The atx 970 could be sold with a little better components though. This bike I think could keep up to the treks,fishers,and the Norco's full suspension bikes. If | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ashes
a downhiller
from Perth, West Australia
Date Reviewed: April 21, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought a '97 model ATX980 on January of 1997. I've had it for 15 months now and it continues to impress me. Out of the box the Large model just fitted my 195cm 80kg body.
The Judy C was perfectly sprung for me, although the Type 2 spring system tended to be too progressive and the fork had a little too much compression and rebound(two turns of preload gives a slightly stiffer ride but far better rebound).
I found the rear end was way oversprung with a 500 rear spring. The shift to a 450 spring with minimal preload has produced a far plusher rear end. The shock is also overdamped in both compression and rebound and I have yet to have the oil changed for a lighter weight which should solve the problems.
The LX drive train has worked flawlessly, the only hiccup being the rear deraileur packing it in after 6 months(Bushes and springs were nackered), and the V brakes pads last about one DH race.
When money allows I am keen on changing over to a better bar and stem combination as well as installing a more weather proof headset.
The ATX 980 has proved to a very capable and enjoyable DH machine. It handles most situations well, and once tuned, the suspension is surprisingly plush.
I give the ATX980 a four for its durability and value.
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Corey
a downhiller
from Adelaide South Australia
Date Reviewed: April 14, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought my ATX970 in December of 96 and it hasn't failed me yet although I have upgraded to Z1 boambers and mavic 121's put on my own rear linkage so I get 108cm travel front and rear (nice balance for a spare bike)
Bottom line is it does the job for the money! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
HTmaniac
a cross-country rider
from Taiwan
Date Reviewed: April 14, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Got one of the first ATX 990 from 96, loged more than 3000 km on it of really bad terrain and mostly did muddy wet winter ride with it...some of the component like headset, BB, RS judy, and XT V-brakes are of course dead, howevr the frame old up well apart some corrossion appearing under the paint.
Good point for the rear suspension linkages which did not yet wear out nor developed any play...
The ride is confortable, with very little pogo up the hill..the hight BB need some time to get used to. The rider weight being quite backward make for a stable bike downhill and easy to negociate drop off/extremely steep slopes. Not too quick steering and a bit heavy at 12.5 kg...
Good bike to play around, I give it 3 because it is a FS ! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
francois caron
a cross-country rider
from Montreal Canada
Date Reviewed: April 10, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
i have a giant 970 from last year.For the price it is a good deal! i just regrets the bike as no v-brake so this years i bought STX_RC v-brake.Ireplace the bottom braket came defective,rusty by water.I recommand this bike for people who want a real mountain bike.
I have no complaint about the rear suspension . | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Gary Danis
a weekend warrior
from Durham, CT
Date Reviewed: April 9, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I purchased this bike as my first mountain bike. It is a great entry level dual suspension bike to learn on. It really shines as is as a hill climber. Now that my technique has improved, I found it was time to improve some of the components. The Indy C fork has been replaced by a Manitou FS-TI and the rear shock is about to be replaced by a Cane Creek AD-10.Upgraded to V-brakes. Big difference in performance. The Shimano/Grip shift components work well. The bottom line is you usually get what you pay for. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Franky
a weekend warrior
from Perth, Western Australia
Date Reviewed: March 30, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Living up in what hills there are around Perth, I found my ATX 970 to be good fun. Climbing is fairly easy, but on the downhills, with our local pea gravel, the RST 22 is way too bouncy, resulting in a loss of control & too much rear-wheel lockup. I would prefer a much more damped shock. I also had to replace the Indy C forks with Judy long-travels to take the beating up here. After reading other comments on this page, I think I'll replace the botom bracket before it lets me down.
Overall, the bike has taken a hiding without complaint. I just can't get used to the bad choice of rear shock, & I don't have the cash to replace it... never mind, skin grows back eventually! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
STINKER
a weekend warrior
from OZ
Date Reviewed: March 8, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I gotta say that the 970 is bang for buck and i'm a happy camper. However I wanted more rear travel and ooooooh boy did i get it. I got one of those BIG 5 kits from CTR (Crash Test Research) in Adelaide. Spoke to the dude on the phone and by the weekend had 5 of fantastic SMOOOOTH rear travel. I think the guys name was Garry and his # is 015 791 541. it was the best $80.00 I've ever spent!... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Iceman
a cross-country rider
from Sydney, Australia
Date Reviewed: January 30, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Okay, thought might add something after almost 2 months since I got my '98 ATX 970...well, I agree with others, the rear shock seems a bit stiff at first, but after couple of weeks fine tuning it, it was actually pretty sweet ! Went to do some hard riding and flying at local fire trail, it was very very well-balanced...especially the Rock Shox Indy C Long-Travel at front, I personally thought it was a very good choice...and well-matched with the RST22 at rear, both gives 3.5 travel...Should you get it ? Definately...race ready components all round, and all you need to add is may be a Bullet Brothers chain tensioner because that chaing does slapping all over the chain stay when it gets tough...and may be a LX or XT V-brake with cartridge pads 'cause STX-RC brakes are pain in the ass to adjust... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Cyberdude
a
from Toronto
Date Reviewed: January 26, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
This bike is one of the biggest mistakes ever.The suspension is completely unbalanced, a normal front end with a rock hard rear, spring weight too heavy and overdamped. I'm ashamed to say I owned it, but luckily found someone just as dumb to buy it. My specialized FSR Pro will be here soon, I can't wait to ride a real steed. Stay away from Giant, there going downhill, service is crap. I wish I wish I could give it negative stars. | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Victor
a weekend warrior
from Malaysia
Date Reviewed: January 14, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have the 97' ATX980. No regrets at all, it's a great bike, still performs very well, despite after almost a year's torture and hammering. However, there are a few small problems with the bike, you may check out my website for details and also look for the Long Term Test Report. Have fun!http://www.geocities.com/WallStreet/Floor/2890/ | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kieran Latty
a cross-country rider
from Sydney
Date Reviewed: January 9, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
After purchasing the 98 modeland going over the did i get the best bike for my money I am now quite happy with my purchase. The rear shock is stiff and only has about 3 inches of travell, but this combined with the geometry and shock system gives a bike which doesn,t bob much at all, and with it's great stiff frame the power transfer is very efficient. A great buy, the only other bike i would buy in this price range would be a mongoose pro 3.2 or mayby a diamondback V link. In my opinion this bike bridges the gap beetween hartail and dually, and is a great XC racer, when upgraded to STX-RC all round and a pair of conti silica tires | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
BRENDAN VILJOEN
a weekend warrior
from Zimbabwe
Date Reviewed: December 22, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
MY GIANT ATX 980 IS BRILLIANT ESPECIALLY AFTER REPLACING THE FRONT SHOCKS AND THE REAR SUSPENSION CAM PLATES. WITH 4 INCHES OF TRAVEL ALL ROUND THE BIKE HANDLES WELL AROUND CORNERS AND SUCKS UP MOST BUMPS. THE ORIGINAL JUDY C,S THE BIKE CAME WITH WERE SO HARD WE NEEDED A HAMMER TO GET THEM TO MOVE!!! THE BIKE CLIMBS WELL COMPARED TO OTHER SUSPENSION BIKES . I WOULD RECOMEND THIS BIKE TO ANYONE WHO ENJOYS SINGLETRACK AND FAST DECENTS. BUT BE WARNED CHECK AND KEEP THOSE PIVOTS TIGHT, OR YOU'LL JUST SNAP THE SUSPENSION PINS! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bob
a racer
from Puerto rico
Date Reviewed: December 4, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I purchased a Giant ATX 970 at my LBS, and When I saw it I just fell in love with it. My Bike came in yellow, With a dark purple rear. I think that it is one of the best full suspension bikes out on the market. The hills are a little harder then the Downs, But when you go down Be ready for the time of your life. It is such a great preformer. I would say that If you would like to buy a full suspension bike this is the one for comfort and pleasure. Don't get me wrong, this bike you can ride the hell out of and you will not suffer from it. I absolutlely love it. The Best full suspension for the $$$ I have ever seen. Even if you have to buy a used one I think that it is still worth it. My Word to the wise, Buy One no mater what. You will love it!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Paul Iceman Chen
a weekend warrior
from Sydney, Australia
Date Reviewed: November 28, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
'98 Giant ATX970Just got it yesterday and I have to say it is very IMPRESSIVE ! Or you can say 'love at first sight' !Shimano STX-RC all round and much more...Rockshox Indy C long travel is nicely suited to the bike...with time, tune the rear RST22 to your body weight yields amazing resultsVery light weight too...lighter than I expected...Had a few nice moderate downhill runs and for a first time FS rider, I can see myself adds about 10km/h (9.9km/h registered on Cateye Mitty2) faster than by HT one before !ABout the money...f$@#ing excellent value for money ! I have been searching a FS bike to suit my budget and honestly this is the best and cost least you can get ! And the BEST looking one too ! With the new navy frame and mango rear traingle it will definately get you 'laid' !Happy MTBing ! I think I want to call myself FSManiac III now... | | Overall Rating: |
|
$ 975.00
