Gary Fisher Sugar 293 2003 Full Suspension

Gary Fisher Sugar 293 2003 Full Suspension 

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 12  
[Aug 19, 2003]
John
Cross Country Rider

Strength:

Handling, fit, some good parts, smooth ride, great traction. Its real purdy too. Big wheels roll over everything and feel unstoppable. Very fast and stable downhill.

Weakness:

Could be lighter, a bit more travel on the forks, no disk brakes. Need to keep momentum up when climbing hills or it starts feeling heavy.

After my trusty Proflex disintegrated on me I started looking for a new ride. I tried out a lot of bikes including including a large 293 which I liked but felt a bit small. The Enduro was plush but too pricy, I liked the suspension on the NRS a lot and I might have bit if there was one in my size, the Jamis had great parts (sweet fork) but didn't fit or handle as well as the Fisher. Anyways, I saw this bike on ebay, put in a low bid, and got a good deal. Not as many people want an XL frame with 29" wheels I guess. I've only had it a short while but here are my impressions so far.

Fit: I measure 6' 2" and weigh in at 215lbs. I finally have a bike that fits me. On my other bikes I have to jack the seat post way up for leg extension and end up having to mess with stems/spacers so the bars are the right height. Even then I ended up riding hunchback style sometimes. Not so with the Fisher. With the saddle at the right height the bars are just below the seat and just the right distance. Its a different, not so painful, world on this thing.

Frame: Looks cool, well built with beefy gussets. Great geometry. Very upgradable, Good warranty. Did I mention it looks cool ... its got sparkly paint.

Parts: The bike is spec'd fairly well, though the seat sucked (don't they all), and I was hoping for disk brakes for the midwest mud. Great fork and shock. There are a few places to save some weight I've read, but for now I'm just happy to have shocks that don't bounce like pogo sticks and a frame that fits.

I was unsure whether I would like the big wheels but after a few outings they're growing on me. True, they aren't as nimble on really tight trails but they seem make up for it everywhere else. Once your up to speed on the big wheels they just go over and through everything fast. The bike really seems to excel on longer rides. Its hard to quantify it - I just like how it feels like your cruising faster without working as hard. It would be interesting to try a 26" inch Sugar back to back on some trails and see if its all in my head.

Overall I highly recommend the 293. I only gave it four for value because a lot of bikes come with disks at this price. If I was racing I think the hot ticket would be the a really light hardtail 29er. Or a light 29x if you could afford to build it.

Similar Products Used:

Tried out: Specialized Enduro, Giant NRS 2, Jamis xlt 2.0, GT I-Drive 2.0, Trek Fuel - own a broken Proflex 954, Diamond Back Ascent EX

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jul 01, 2003]
Ty
Cross Country Rider

Strength:

The ride, the ride, and the ride
I'm sure it's not the stongest climber, and I'm sure there are freeride bikes that cruise better down. But, with both the up and down combined, it's a great ride. Most of the trails here are open and sandy or open and rocky, and the bike has been superior. I'll go riding on two consecutive days on the same trail with this bike and my hardtail, and I love the differences the 293 gives me. I'll take it up in the treeline later this Summer, and report back

Weakness:

I've have been disappointed with the brakes. I can't decide if Fisher was trying to save weight or money by using the rim brakes. "Money" I'm sure. The value of this bike with be so much better with disc brakes. I now go faster down, and have less breaking power. The frame, fork, and hubs are all disc ready. It doesn't make sense to me.

If you're a little taller, and a lot of your ridding is not super tight and technical, this is just a WOW! ride. If you like those bomber decents (and who doesn't), I would upgrade the brakes.

Similar Products Used:

I've ridden a couple Full suspension bikes, but this is the first one I have owned. I also own an Airborne Lucky Strike. A great bike for the clydesdale I am.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Sep 04, 2003]
Phil

Strength:

Adjustability, Speed, 29" tires

Weakness:

Pedals... The Shimanos literally lock your foot in and will not let it go, replaced them with Time pedals. The weight 30 lbs.

Buy this bike... Yeah its heavy, but just trade out some parts and bang you've got a solid bike. Up hills are easy in the right gear, and downhills scream. Those 29ers take anything that I have thrown at them including a telephone pole layed on its side. Thats a big log, my crank got stuck but it was worth the try anyway.

Similar Products Used:

First MTB

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Nov 11, 2002]
Larry

Strength:

Very fast on downhill trails, high-speed stability, tracks over tree roots and rocks better than 26-inch wheels.

Weakness:

Not a great climber, turns a little sluggishly on tight trails.

Of all the bikes available to demo at the Nov. 2002 Southern Indiana Mountain Bike Festival at Valley Branch, I would have to say I was most looking forward to riding the Gary Fisher Sugar 293. I’d ridden Sugars before, but couldn’t wait to see how the 29-inch wheels handled on the trail.

The ride is typical Sugar, firm and stable, but with one fairly major difference. The 293 does not handle tight trails quite as well as the regular 26-inch shod Sugars.

The 29-inch wheels do perform as advertised as far as stability riding over obstacles. You do feel a little more confidence over roots and rocks with the larger wheels, but the trade off is a little bit of a sluggish feeling through tight singletrack. Also this bike felt a bit heavy on climbs and the wheels only add to the heft.

One place the 29-inchers really shine are on smooth doubletrack, especially downhill. I passed a slew of riders on Valley Branch’s famous doubletrack downhill trail where speeds reach over 40 mph. This bike was so unbelievably stable on this hyper-speed section. There really was a noticeable difference with this bike that particular section.

In the final analysis I look at 29-inch tires on mountain bikes as a passing fad. Sort of like the period in tennis racquets where the manufacturers kept making them longer. Yeah, you got a bigger serve out of those racquets, but they lacked control on the groundstrokes and they eventually went back to normal sized. With the 29-inch wheels there are some advantages, but they don’t overweigh the overall drawbacks.

Similar Products Used:

Nothing with 29-inch wheels.

OVERALL
RATING
3
VALUE
RATING
3
[Nov 25, 2003]
Roman
Weekend Warrior

Strength:

Wonderfull frame geometry,simple suspension design,rolls over everything,great fork, the stupid look the guy at the LBS gives you beacause he doesn't know what you're talking about when you say you ride a 29.

Weakness:

Lack of parts/accesories at any LBS, flat saddle, Bontrager components look cheap,lack of custom gearing(more on that below), a little heavy (30 lbs), large frame holds only 1 short bottle.

This is a great bike. Let me start by saying I'm a beginner to biking after 18 years & man things have changed. I'm 6'1" & 150 lbs so I wanted a supple FS bike. Some bikes dont really ride nice unless you're over 180lbs. After going to half a dozen bike shops & getting really mixed up one guy showed me a 29er hardtail. It rode so nice I knew that I now had a standard to compare all of the other bikes against. After many more rides on different bikes I finally settled on a 293. Some things I have found after riding it the rest of the summer - Very fast in almost all conditions even when ridden by this novice, not a bad climber although I wish it had a shorter chainstay (the hardtail does), the fork is awesome (except for those cheap plastic knobs-(the rebound knob was missing from new),the adjustable rear travel is unnessessary(its gone for 2004-leave it in the long travel position-the seat tube angle decreases by at least 2 degrees and you become less efficient at peddaling-ask any roadie!). Some things I have tried- tried swapping the IRC Mythos 2.1 tires (great tire but it snakebites too easily) for a Specialized Nimbus hybrid tire (700x38mm) for the road-almost no reduction in rolling resistance but the bikes not fun anymore(I have to slow down over sharp bumps/curbs & the ride is rough). I may try the new Continental Vapor 29 x 2.1 in the spring. The gearing needs work. You have to remember that for any given speed the 29" tire is rolling about 10% slower than a 26" tire, therfore the gearing should be about 10% shorter. The 11-34 rear cassette (11,12,14,16,18,21,24,28,34)is useless in the 2 smallest gears so you end up using 14,16 & 18 almost all of the time. In my search for a better gear I tried an Ultegra 12-27 rear cassette(12,13,14,15,17,19,21,24,27). Now I have a close ratio 13 to 19 & I have really only lost the useless 34 gear. I may try a hard to find Shimano LX or XT 11-32 & swap out the 11 gear & add a 13 in between the 12 & 14 for a nice road gear & a 32 climbing gear. (this may or may not be do-able). Overall I love this bke & will soon be putting it on an expensive diet to take off 2 lbs. (crank, carbon bars,etc). I give it 4 chillis for value(too many cheap components, no discs) & 5 overall because I think Gary is a god.

Similar Products Used:

Trek Fuel 90(blah handling,pogo rear suspension),Giant NRS(tinny frame,suspension only really goes 1 way), Fisher Sugar 2(nice),Specialized Epic(handles awesome,if I wanted a hardtail why would I pay for a FS),Marin Mount Vision(awesome suspension & frame design,bike top tube is 2" too short & I feel like i'm gonna endo on every jump)

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Apr 02, 2003]
John Smith
Cross Country Rider

Strength:

Supple / not soggy suspension feel, Rolling - rolling - rolling on those 29s

Weakness:

Geometry is a bit funky - long / wide front-end (fixable), high center of gravity

Rode this at GF demo-day in the fall. They couldn't get me off it. I am a big guy 6'2" and 250 lbs so the larger wheels seemed like a natural to me. Once I got over the center of gravity issue I was so much faster on this than my Joshua. The impedance introduced by small trail obstacles is greatly reduced and the rolling resistance is very light. I wish I had a sandy spot to test the float (but it was nice on log bridges). I am moving up this year and it is between the Kokopelli and this.

Similar Products Used:

Gary Fisher Joshua, Klein Palomino, Trek Fuel 100, C-dale Jekyl

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Apr 23, 2003]
Thomas Miller
Cross Country Rider

Strength:

Speed, stability, confidence

Weakness:

no cartridge headset, Bontrager cranks flex and don't shift as well as others. (Shimano, Raceface, etc)

Everybody needs to ride this bike! I've slowly been hopping on the 29"-er bandwagon and this bike is awesome. The 29" wheel takes some getting used to, but if you calm down and listen to what it tells you to do, it will be faster, smoother, with more traction and confidence than any other bike you've been on. This means; shift early and spin (80+ rpm), lean the bike like a roadie and use those side-knobs (I've been happy on 5-10 lbs less air pressure with no pinch flats), technical trails require more learning time but even at 5'5" I can get those big hoops around any switchback I rode on those tiny wheels.
This is a cross-country bike with the speed of an ultra-lightweight racer, the durability of a trailbike, and the versatility of a cyclo-cross bike. It's not a lightwieght, but is the same weight as other Fisher Sugar+'s. It doesn't matter because the weight is more than compensated for by the characteristics of the big wheels and the Sugar suspension. This is not a freeride bike but riders undecided on a cross-country racer or a long-travel trailbike should buy this ride.
After 18 years of telling serious riders to spend the extra money on a hand-made frame and custom kit, I'm now telling them this unique pair of bikes from Fisher (292,293) offers them advantages they cannot get anywhere else. The shop where I work sold their 293 on the first serious testride within 18 hours of us revceiving the bike, it's that good.

Similar Products Used:

18 year bike mechanic, so I've seen and ridden just about everything.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Feb 27, 2005]
Scott
Cross Country Rider

Strength:

Plush ride. Big wheels allow me to ride over stuff. I think the long wheelbase allows the bike to hook up better, It's hard to lose traction on this rig. Bike runs up and down hill very well. I ride the MTB on the road some, and this ride feels faster on the road too.

Weakness:

A bit heavy at almost 30 lbs. Needs disc brakes, it's easy to over ride the rim brakes. The back noodle rubs on the tire when the rear shock is active. (it's getting discs now) The lock out tab on the shock is plastic and breaks easy, but Marzocchi was cool about sending a replacement metal one in 2 days! No tubeless, no slime, had to go with Stans, which so far has been great.

I really like the 29'er experiance. I'm not a racer, but I ride pretty fast, and this bike lets me really open it up. It's nice to be able to ride out of the line, to get around other riders, and the big wheels make it easy. I ride road too, and I think this bike allows me to ride my "road" style off road.

Similar Products Used:

Tried Liquid, Fuel, Cake, but I really believe 29's are better for my style of riding.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Aug 20, 2003]
Glenn
Cross Country Rider

Strength:

Very fast smooth ride, I can go further with less effort.

Weakness:

Weighs 29 lbs

I used to go biking with my two dogs, but since getting this bike I have had to leave the slower dog home becuase she couldn't keep up. I ride a lot of single track with big climbs around Lake Tahoe and in the desert through rocks, sand and twisty switchbacks. The bike rolls much better and faster with less effort through all conditions, especially sand, than my previous full suspension. At 6'-2" 185 lbs the bike fits me perfectly. I highly recommend the 29" wheels to any riders 6' or taller, smaller riders may want to stick with the smaller wheels to save on weight.

Similar Products Used:

Dimondback V-link full suspension for 5 years

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jul 26, 2003]
alex
Racer

Strength:

stability, stability, cush and the confidence to ride anything doubtful on a 26in.

Weakness:

Heavy as lead. Bottle cage mount for small bottle only. Marzok ETA Pro knobs didnt last one ride before disenegrating and falling off in peices.

After riding this around the parking lot at the LBS i almost put it back on the shelf but I read so many praises about this bike I just had to try it out. I was'nt dissapointed.
This bike is absolutely the funnest bike I've ever owned. As all the others have said it's very stable, comfortable as well as a superior climber, and handles rock gardens, and baby head fields like a dream.
The marzok rebound knob fell off after one ride and the lockout knob stripped, cracked and fell off in peices after two rides. When i called marzok they blamed me for not checking the fork before the ride, what a bunch of crap. Thats why i dont deal w/ marzok.
The rep said it was 28.6lbs and my scale read 29.1 and the LBS shop of a friend weighed in at 30lbs. I do alot of climbing w/ many rocks, switch backs, and ledges this bike handles it all except after about 1.5hrs of climbing this bike gets heavier and heavier on the climbs until its really miserable. Ive learned to use the bikes own momentum to slingshot up smaller climbs w/ ease but long smooth steep climbs and its just your legs and the bike. I'm certain i can get this bike down to 26lbs by switching over to all XT, carbon post/bar, lighter wheels and non disc hubs, lighter tires and stans no tubes. If i can get it down to 26lbs i will definately be racing this bike. I'd be interested in any other owners actual weights. All said im sold on 29 and its just a matter of time before the community becomes believers.

Similar Products Used:

Trek Fuel, Trek HT OCLV, Giants

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
3
Showing 1-10 of 12  

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

mtbr.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.