|
|
|
| |
Submitted by
Ammoforfire
a Cross Country Rider
from Pittsburgh
Date Reviewed: November 12, 2009 | | Favorite Trail: | AT | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Purchased At: | Found in Dumpster | | Strengths: | Tough as nails | | Weaknesses: | None, Maybe kryptonite | | Similar Products Used: | Jamis, Raliegh, Specialized | | Bike Setup: | 1991 Treck 8000. All deore with in top tube rear brake cable. | | Bottom Line: | Man I loved this bike! Unbelivable quality that you really can't find anymore. I rode all over the mountains of N.C. on this beast after found in Dumpster around 2001. Cleaned it up, gave it new pads, tires, tubes and saddle and it was a dream. I rode it for about 4 years then gave to a friend to have a ride for school. Rides better than ANY bike I have had since. Currently I have a Jamis Ventura that I commute with 15 miles a day and still dream of how silky that 8000 was. The Matrix Singletrack wheels sent this things value over the edge. Even though I would blow by it now, that thing was a dream. If you ever see one, BUY IT! | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
ldj
a Weekend Warrior
from Savannah, GA
Date Reviewed: July 13, 2009 | | Favorite Trail: | Tybee Island | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1000.00 | | Purchased At: | LBS (Bham, Alabama) | | Strengths: | Solid frame! Weight. Disturbingly excellent frame geometry for me (6'0, 190 lbs.). Stiffness! The bike transmits power well and goes everywhere you can can point and pedal. | | Weaknesses: | Weight. But play around ($) and you will get what you like. | | Similar Products Used: | None. | | Bike Setup: | Upgrades since 1997: SRAM X-7 ($500), Serfas Vermin-R tires, Serfas RX seat, Truvativ Firex crankarms, WTB Dual Duty rims ($50/each).
Stock: Frame, RockShox Q21R, handlebars, seat post, reflectors and pedals. | | Bottom Line: | I have put an ungodly number of miles on this bike. From Canada to Florida, it has seen trails, pavement, potholes, tree roots, sidewalks, parking garages, metal grating, wooden bridges, brick, sand and more. Before I bought a road bike, this was my road bike!
I am a firefighter and use this bike to keep my legs, lungs and heart strong, primarily using it on 15 miles ocean surf rides, and as an urban warrior/attack vehicle. The bike is great!! Just spray it off at the end of the day, hit rust prone spots with some silicon spray, and it will be ready and waiting for the next outing.
I would not hesitate to take this 10+ year old bike anywhere: Montana rivers, Nevada desert, or the Alps.
I hesitate not one bit to say that this is one of the best built frames and bikes of its generation. It is the Defender 90 or CJ-7 of mountain bikes in the late 1990s and it is as reliable today as ever, thanks to a few (<$900) upgrades over the past 10 years!
I will not buy or ride another Hardtail mountain bike until this one simply cracks, is stolen, or disintegrates.
IT ROCKS!! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Joe Van de Velde
a Cross Country Rider
from London On Canada
Date Reviewed: March 22, 2008 | | Favorite Trail: | Fanshawe | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1500.00 | | Purchased At: | ToWheels | | Strengths: | Super fast and climbs like a dream. Extremely light and very eye catching. | | Weaknesses: | Some stock parts just don't cut it in the long haul. | | Similar Products Used: | Raleigh, Giant, Wal-Mart special | | Bike Setup: | 19.5" frame.Full XT 9 speed conversion kit. Easton EA70 bar and seat post. Rock Shox Sid fork. | | Bottom Line: | Just Can't get any better for an aluminum cross country race rocket. If you like speed and handling this is the bike for you. If full suspension and lazy handling is prefered than steer clear however you don't know what you are missing. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Paul
a Weekend Warrior
from Augusta,Maine USA
Date Reviewed: June 18, 2007 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1000.00 | | Purchased At: | Auclair Cycle Augusta, Maine | | Strengths: | Light, Fast, Nice stretched out frame, good component set | | Bike Setup: | Shimano LX all around, except XT rear derailer | | Bottom Line: | This bike is great!!! This is by far the best bike I have ever own. I purchased this bike brand new in 1992 for around $1000.00 and have ridden on and off for the last 15 years. It is super light weight and it's geared high so it goes like crazy. All I do is just clean and lube the drive train, and after 15 years I can it'll still go out and rip it up! I really love this bike. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
brad
a Weekend Warrior
from buffalo,ny.....now winston, nc :(
Date Reviewed: February 16, 2006 | | Favorite Trail: | some place in west virginia...25mi, it was sweet | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Purchased At: | $800 in 1997 | | Strengths: | very comfortable geometry......parts are different, but the frame is still solid | | Weaknesses: | paint chips, so i took it all off.........now its nasty lookin....unpainted. i like that. | | Similar Products Used: | some raleigh........1992 gt psycho......... | | Bike Setup: | who really cares, nothing remarkable.......grip shifts rock! | | Bottom Line: | This bike is perfectly laid out.........nice and long profile for comfortable all day riding. I kept the lame stock stem just because it is so perfect for my size. Really responsive and builds confidence if u need it. Somewhat bumpy but it is aluminum. Its just what it is meant to be. If u got one, you know it rocks!!!!!
Now i just found a 2004 salsa bandito frame for half the price from a friend........i am very lucky. Salsa is a step up i hope. I'll still keep this frame though, love it. Maybe I'll make a frankenstein bike of sorts out of it. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Goran
a Cross Country Rider
from Croatia,Zagreb
Date Reviewed: April 14, 2003 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$750.00 | | Purchased At: | Local store | | Strengths: | Great frame,stiff,durable-had him for 5 years of every day abuse | | Weaknesses: | Rock shox q21r ,front derailleour ,rear wheel-all broken but it was about time | | Similar Products Used: | KHS summit | | Bike Setup: | stock,exept for the upper parts | | Bottom Line: | Great bike! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Goran
a Cross Country Rider
from Croatia,Zagreb
Date Reviewed: April 14, 2003 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$750.00 | | Purchased At: | Local store | | Strengths: | Great frame,stiff,durable-had him for 5 years of every day abuse | | Weaknesses: | Rock shox q21r ,front derailleour ,rear wheel-all broken but it was about time | | Similar Products Used: | KHS summit | | Bike Setup: | stock,exept for the upper parts | | Bottom Line: | Great bike! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kuma
a Racer
from cincinnati
Date Reviewed: March 5, 2003 | | Favorite Trail: | I'm not telling | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$500.00 | | Strengths: | I have been riding and racing this bike for TEN (!!!) years. Granted, the only thing left original is the frame -testament to the quality. This bike is light, fast, and handles wonderfully. The aluminum ride is very stiff and took some getting used to, tho'. | | Weaknesses: | None | | Bike Setup: | Manitou Mars fork, scott liteflite handlebar, WTBspeedmaster rims with hoogi hubs, serfas ace seat | | Bottom Line: | It will be a very sad day for me if the frame ever gives in to the punishment of regualr racing. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Suzanne O
a Cross Country Rider
from United Kingdom
Date Reviewed: February 4, 2003 | | Favorite Trail: | x country | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1500.00 | | Purchased At: | mtb shop in Newbury | | Strengths: | Excellent good all rounder. Fantastic bike, no desire to change it/ upgrade it etc/ 100% happy with this bike. It's fast, it's strong, it's never been a problem. | | Weaknesses: | I cant think of any. | | Similar Products Used: | Old bike was a GT Timberline - the Trek beats this one. | | Bike Setup: | Trek zx8000, Rock shox indy front suspension forks, XT V brakes. | | Bottom Line: | I do not desire another bike, this one is for life. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Seth Weiner
a Cross Country Rider
from Chicago
Date Reviewed: October 8, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | anything | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$460.00 | | Purchased At: | Ebay | | Strengths: | THIS BIKE KICKS ASS. It can take anything. It climbs like a mountain goeat on coke. The geometry is perfect for me. Great yellow paint. | | Weaknesses: | chain sometimes falls off for no reason, the r derailleur is a litte mess up, 8 spd, I dont have two | | Similar Products Used: | trek 6500, M2 Stumpjumper | | Bike Setup: | XT all around, Chris King headset, Manitou X-Vert, System stem and handle bars, mavic rims, | | Bottom Line: | Buy this bike! When I was buying a bike it was between this bike and a Gunnar Rock Hound. I lost the bid on the Gunnar and was pissed, so I bought this bike. At first I thought it sucked but then tuned it a bit. It goes. The gunnar is nothing compaired to this bike now. Just tweak it a bit. I also got a really good deal in this bike. AWSOME YELLOW PAINT. This trek can also take a beating. It may not have the carbon sids or XTR all around but this is a damn good bike. I wou | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
ian
a Cross Country Rider
from connecticut
Date Reviewed: February 10, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | any | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1000.00 | | Purchased At: | newington bike - connecticut | | Strengths: | everything strong light | | Weaknesses: | just the lack of paint... parially my fault | | Similar Products Used: | trek 9700 trek 7000 trek 6500 | | Bike Setup: | 97 trek 8000 xtr wheels, xtr rear der., xtr v brakes, chris king headset, xt front der. lx shifters and levers stx rc cranks(sux) judy sl front fork welgo clipless pedals stock trek seat, seatpost, handlebars, and stem. | | Bottom Line: | nice hardtail strong and durable yet light. the only downside is i got he biek with just an aluminum color no paint was applyed so i have a silverish bike with yellow decales. it looks nice except the decales have begun to peal a bit... strickly cosmetic. also the indys crapped out on me so i had to purchase new judys but this might be my fault partially i took the boots off and road the !%@$ out of it. regardless the bike has stood by me and been a great ride.... | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Doug Gangi
a Weekend Warrior
from Phoenix, AZ
Date Reviewed: January 1, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | Phx Mtn Preserve Trail 100 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$800.00 | | Purchased At: | Used | | Strengths: | Frame geometry, frame rigidity, weight, overall handling, overall durability | | Weaknesses: | Ride can be a little punishing at times (not as bad as a Klein) | | Similar Products Used: | Specialized, Iron Horse, Klein, Gary Fischer | | Bike Setup: | XT grupo, Kooka cranks, Nuke Proof hubs, Mavic 217 wheels, Answer rocker seatpost, Serfas saddle, Manitou SXTi fork, Salsa handlebars, Chris King headset, Bontrager Jones tires | | Bottom Line: | I have owned this bike for just over 3 years and I still love it as much as the day I purchased it. The frame geometry is just great for my body -- fits like a glove. This bike is quick, handles great, and loves to climb (featherweight bike - about 23 pounds). The build quality of the frame is fantastic -- even with all the punishment this bike takes from me I have had absolutely no problems with the welds, tubing, or paint. I ride mostly in the dry Arizona desert, so the frame takes a lot of abuse from rocks.
I can't fairly rate this as a "standard" Trek 8000. If you read through my bike setup you will notice that most of the parts on the bike were not included in the manufactured model -- the previous owner (who had it only 6 months) stripped off most of the parts and rebuilt the bike with custom parts. Over time I swapped out the fork (had a Rock Shox POS before) and saddle (tore it to shreds). However, most of the manners of the bike can be attributed to the frame...and this frame just plain kicks butt.
But be advised - hard tails aren't for everybody, especially stiff aluminum hard tails like the Trek 8000. This is a fast bike that loves to be ridden hard. It also requires a relatively skilled rider that appreciates such a bike. If you want a nice cushy ride or something that screams down rocky descents without bucking you like a bronco, then go find something that is sprung on both ends -- a hard tail isn't your bike.
I have ridden a number of other hard tails and nothing comes close in terms of quickness, responsiveness, and overall fun to ride. I have never tried the Schwinn Homegrown and I hear lots of rave reviews about that bike...but for now I am sticking with Trek. This is just a great bike and I'll never get rid of it, even if I upgrade to a full suspension bike in the future. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jeff Danault
a Racer
from Ft. Campbell
Date Reviewed: December 22, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | LBL | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Price Paid: |
$1149.00 | | Purchased At: | Naults In Manchester | | Strengths: | Kick ass Frame, Good Geometry, great color scheme, comes with half way decent stock Components | | Weaknesses: | Frame could be a little stiffer, Shifter and brake levers are one piece, upgrade one and you must upgrade the other also fault by shimano though | | Similar Products Used: | All Sorts of Rides | | Bike Setup: | 2001 Trek 8000, Mavic Crossrock, Python Tubeless, Race Face System, Easton MonkeyLite, Chris King Headset, Crank Bros egg Beaters, Race Face Stem, | | Bottom Line: | This is a great bike for the money! The stock Components kick ass, I raced my first race completly stock (Nov 11, KY state championships) and took 3rd in my class. Weight is good, If you want a good bike to race without lots of upgrades this is the one for you! Or make it a real head turner and smoke everybody on the trail by making sweet upgrades on a smokin frame. Great job by TREK!!! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Josh Wagner
a Weekend Warrior
from Prescott, Az, USA
Date Reviewed: February 14, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | granite basin | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$200.00 | | Purchased At: | Pawn Palace | | Strengths: | strong,lite frame, nice components. | | Weaknesses: | old school manitou front shock-kinda heavy and angular. | | Similar Products Used: | not really | | Bike Setup: | pretty much stock:
different stem for a more comfortable riding position.
All shifters LX, except the rear derailer: XT.
Serfas dual-density seat.
Manitou Magnum front shock.
| | Bottom Line: | I bought it used. This is the nicest bike I have ever owned. It makes me want to be a better mountainbiker. I must confess I bought it mostly because I needed a commuter to get to school, and it was a really good price. I would upgrade the shock if I could afford to. I've heard people say they've gotten their bikes down to close to 20lbs. Make's me curious how they did it. Otherwise I'm putting a lot of miles on it, and enjoying them all. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
jake staron
a Cross Country Rider
from m'town iowa usa
Date Reviewed: July 17, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | i love em all | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Strengths: | light, strong, lots of goodness | | Weaknesses: | my fork is heavy | | Similar Products Used: | specialized rock hopper | | Bike Setup: | lx front, xt rear, matrix swami wheels, manitou pos front shock, xt v brakes kickass | | Bottom Line: | im 16 years old and i bought my 96 trek 8000zx for 800 bucks a little over a year ago and ive upgraded nuthing except the crank, which sucked cuz it was suntour, but enough on that...and my next upgrade will be my fork, to whatever looks good and works good...but i dont think i will need anything after that for a while... and i will admit, its not as nice as my friends 9900 pro issue oclv with a sid, dolomites, raceface crankset, and kickass other stuff,..but it doesnt matter cuz hes fat and i can blow his ass off the trails anyway this bike kicks ass
(PS), the yellow frame w/ red decals looks good as hell (even though it chips easily), but it looks badass with panaracer xc pros w/red sidewalls. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Tony Does it matter?
a Cross Country Rider
from New York
Date Reviewed: April 21, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | Forest Park... | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Strengths: | Strong frame
Great customer support
| | Weaknesses: | Paint job
no replaceable rear derailleur hangar | | Similar Products Used: | 96' Trek carbon Y-22 | | Bike Setup: | Yellow 96' Trek 8000 ZX, XTR all around, slime green Marzocchi Atom Bomb, red Sun 0'Degree XC rims, Raceface cranks, rings & bb etc etc... | | Bottom Line: | This bike was the second of two bikes purchased that year, it was a good year. While I finally sold the red carbon Y-22 full suspension, due to excess bobbing issues, the Hardtail 8000 has stood up to all manner of abuse. I've had cars try to kill me by clipping my rear triangle, cut me off forcing me to smash into them front first. Numerous downhill tree and boulder crashings, every type of hit and fall possible. Yet to this day, the only thing I've had to fix on the actual frame was a slightly bent rear der. hangar. Trek's customer support has always been good to me, putting up with my questions and requests in a timely and courteous manner. Mind you my Trek 8000 was the last of the bonded aluminum frames, so you will find no welds on my bike. I'm sure the newer models are better, if not stronger than my model but after all the years of abuse I felt compelled to post this review in lieu of Trek's exemplary work & service. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Eric Vennemeyer
a Cross-Country Rider
from San Francisco, CA
Date Reviewed: November 29, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
El Corte de Madera | | Duration Product Used: |
more than 3 years | | Strengths: |
Strong Frame | | Weaknesses: |
Cable hangers were replaced | | Bike Setup: |
1995 Trek 8000 with Rockshox Judy XC | | Bottom Line: | Great buy, it has lasted a long time, and Trek's service was great when I needed it. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
alfredo cabrera
a Cross-Country Rider
from altadena
Date Reviewed: September 21, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
millard cyn. | | Duration Product Used: |
1 Year | | Strengths: |
frame is very good | | Weaknesses: |
factory parts are not that great,but upgrade to all XTR,front shock is not very good | | Similar Products Used: |
other bikes | | Bike Setup: |
trek 8000 fully xtr,judyt2 rock shox | | Bottom Line: | bike is good but it needs its upgrade,to become full performance | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kurt Hehl
a Racer
from Midland, Ontario, Canada
Date Reviewed: August 26, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Radical course at Hardwood Hills | | Duration Product Used: |
2 Years | | Strengths: |
wicked frame and decals (unfinished silver and yellow decals
good x-country racing fork (Indy SL) shiters (x-rays)
the rear derailer (XT)
good overall race-ready component grouping | | Weaknesses: |
the stock bottom bracket (broke it 3rd race of the season)
for the rims the matrix swami set-up is that durable for racing
didn't like the headset angle at first but got used to it
the wellago clipless that came with it were kinda lame | | Similar Products Used: |
nothing like it really
kind of has the same feel as a specialized stumpjumper or norco torrent | | Bike Setup: |
'97 trek zx8000
indy SL (lizardskin fork boots)
yellow crow bar for handle bar
x-ray shifters
LX crankset
LX bottom bracket ( best value if you spend lots on racing components in a season)
XT rear and fornt derailers
saches masterlink chian
LX rear cassette
Michellin HOT S Wild Grippers ($80 cnd each, highly recommend these tires )
original headset, stem, and front rim
rear wheelset-mavic 517 unanadized rim/LX hub/DT swiss spokes on the front and rear
original front hub
Kalloy Seat Post with XTR Saddle (you can't beat this $40 cushey racing saddle, the biggest bang for your buck)
'99 LX rear brake and '98 front brake with titanium brake booster ( makes a world of difference, same braking power as an XT)
original levers | | Bottom Line: | A wicked bike for anyone who is starting their second race season or for the best of the hardcore weekend warrior/ trials riding/ northshore bombing pycho!
XTR isn't everything! buy what you can afford and don't blow a hole in your pocket book! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bill T.
a Cross-Country Rider
from St. Louis, MO
Date Reviewed: August 10, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
1 Year | | Strengths: |
Good looking, bonded frame. Decent components. | | Weaknesses: |
Rock Shox Indy SL. | | Similar Products Used: |
Trek 830, Klein Attitude, Specialized Stumpjumper. | | Bike Setup: |
Stock/house wheels, XTR rear der, XT front der, WTB Momentum headset, Indy SL, Frogs. | | Bottom Line: | Good race ready bike for the money. I have owned this bike for over 1 1/2 years and have replaced or upgraded the front and rear derailleur, bottom bracket, headset, tires, and pedals. I think I read someone complain about a squeak/creak. Check the seatpost. Take it out, clean and grease. If that doesn't fix it, someone mentioned something about locktite down the tube, check the 8000SL reviews. Anyway, I'd have to say that other than the piece of junk Indy SL (which will be the next thing I upgrade), this bike is great. Its stiff and responsive will allows it to be an awesome climber and float through singletrack. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
david
a Weekend Warrior
from wichita falls, tx
Date Reviewed: May 22, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Any and all | | Duration Product Used: |
2 Years | | Strengths: |
Very light bike overall | | Weaknesses: |
Seat kills my butt, but I think all cool bikes do this. | | Bottom Line: | My Trek is an 8000ZX have not seen to many posts on the ZX version, not shure what the differences are. I am shure that I will keep this bike for a long tome, upgrade components when needed. I love the aluminum finish with yellow stickers. My frame is also bonded, I think Trek welds all frames now. Email me if you have a ZX later on. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jonathan P
a Cross-Country Rider
from Toronto Ontario
Date Reviewed: April 26, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
less than 1 month | | Strengths: |
Light frame, great parts spec, '99 model(mine) weighs 22.5lbs. Bontrager wheels kick ass, Icon parts are light and the '99 Manitou SX fork is the 80mm travel fork you can get. Its really adjustable. | | Weaknesses: |
Stock bottom bracket was garbage, shop upgraded to XT BB for only $20 | | Similar Products Used: |
'98 Trek 6000
'99 Klein Mantra Race | | Bike Setup: |
'99 Manitou SX fork
LX/XT drivetrain
Bontrager Maverick wheelset
Avid brakes and levers | | Bottom Line: | This bike really kicks ass for the money. Its at home on the race course(with no mods needed) or at your local MTB trail | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
TK
a Cross-Country Rider
from Helsinki, Finland
Date Reviewed: April 19, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
2 Years | | Strengths: |
Lightweight
Everything | | Weaknesses: |
Nothing | | Similar Products Used: |
Rocky Mountain Thin Air
Kona Kula | | Bike Setup: |
Trek ZX8000, Indy SL, Xt components... | | Bottom Line: | It is a very good bike. I have liked it very much.
Do anybody now howmuch the frame weights in KG???
I eont never trade this bike. Trek Rulezzz 4-ewa!
If you now the answer please email it to me.
Thanks! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Harry jones
a cross-country rider
from Colombia-b/manga(south-america)
Date Reviewed: January 29, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
My second bike..rides perfect(rules) I make some updates like the fork ( put a 1998 indy sl(long travel))and change the front and rear derailleurs ( xt and xtr)
Rides perfect for me..and for the money (im my previous review i make a grammar mistake..sorry)
TREK # 1 ( ZX 8000 RULES) | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Harry Jones
a cross-country rider
from Colombia-b/manga(south-america)
Date Reviewed: January 27, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
My second bike..really rules..I update some components like the fork( put a 1998 indy sl longtravel)and the front and rear derailleurs ( xt -xtr)
bike model( 1997)
Rides perfect for me and for my the money..
trek rules.............. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
djride
a weekend warrior
from houston,tx
Date Reviewed: October 4, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
its rad. i have owned it since mid summer and i ride daily. not one problem with it. its still all stock because i don't buy new stuff till the old stuff breaks. The frame has great geometry and can conquer the maddest hill. i love it . Trek is rad. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Tim Carroll
a weekend warrior
from Conrad, MT
Date Reviewed: September 22, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I love this bike!!! I am a sixteen year-old. I worked all summer long to buy a bike, and I bought the '98 8000sl because it was light, it had great components, and it was within my price-range. I didn't like the fork on it that much (it is a Judy T2, but it's elastomer), so my first upgrade was before I bought it. I had a friend at the dealership slap on a Judy XC. It rides like a dream!! Trek handwelds every frame, and their time and effort definitely pays off. If you are looking for a good, inexpensive performance bike, this bike is a sure winner. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Nicolai Michel
a cross-country rider
from Canada
Date Reviewed: August 29, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought my '97 8000SHX in the spring of '97 because it had the lowest weight and best components of any bike in its price range. I got the dealer to swap the GripShift for RapidFire XT. The STX-RC front derailleur soon started rattling, so I replaced it with an XT. The bike has performed flawlessly for over 1000 km of off-roading. I don't find the frame too stiff even though I only weigh 125 lbs. I also love the care-free unpainted frame. Highly recommended!
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Seth Galinski
a racer
from torrington, ct.
Date Reviewed: May 30, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
This bike is great out of the box but first i upgraded it to XT stuff and it was that much better...for me it works fine and is cheaper than xtr. the frame just plain rules, it's the lightest, stiffest, most responsive frame i've ever raced. THE BIKE IS WORTH EVERY CENT. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
kyle cooper
a weekend warrior
from nc
Date Reviewed: May 19, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
just bought a yellow trek 8000, absolutely love it!! It took me five years of looking for a new bike cause I loved my 85 Bianchi so much, but now it has been changed to my commuting bike, and the Trek is my pounder.
So far it does great for me on easy single track and fireroads, the frame and shock work great with my weight (220 lbs) It feels very strong and I dont worry so much about breaking the frame. soon i will be going to Pishgah or Uhwarrie forrests for some extended riding...will post then. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Spanky
a cross-country rider
from East Coast
Date Reviewed: May 6, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought a 1996 Trek 8000 frame for $25 from a guy at my shop. I built it up with XT and Spin wheels. After I got rid of the spins, the bike was great. It's relatively light, and the long wheelbase makes it stable at higher speeds. I felt that it couldn't climb as well as my old Trek 990 or my new Klein Mantra. However, it's light weight made up for that. I ended up giving the bike away to my dad. I built it up as a singlespeed for him and he loves it. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mark
a cross-country rider
from NEW YORK
Date Reviewed: April 17, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have been riding my '95 8000 shx for 3 years now and it's still great. Very light frame (3.1 lbs.), stiff enough for good acceleration, but not so stiff that it beats you up on the downhills. Pretty good components, but I have made some upgrades over the years. I had the dealer switch the fork from the Quad 5 to a Judy XC, and last year I got some XT V-brakes(the stock STX-RC just weren't cutting it anymore).I also have Ritchey clipless pedals and a Scott thermoplastic bar w/ integrated bar ends(I love this bar and it's super light). I have noticed that the seatstays flex a bit with the V-brakes, but not too bad. This bike rides great, is very light for the price, and has taken a lot of abuse with no problems. I would definetly recoment this bike to anyone. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris Kuhl
a cross-country rider
from Mechanicsburg PA
Date Reviewed: January 22, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I thought this bike handled very well under bumby conditions. The Judy T2 performes very well. The frame is very rigid and light. There is no powerloss the power goes right to the wheels. The frame does not bend at all. I put some X-ray shifters on it. They shift smoothly. This bike is excellant for a light racer. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris Buckman
a weekend warrior
from Kankakee, Illinois
Date Reviewed: January 19, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought this bike in November and ride it everyday after class. I loved the yellow al. frame and the components were the best combo I could find for the price. The only complaint is the radial laced front wheel( great looks but not good at staying in tru) and the poor quality rubber used in the Bontrager Revolts. They are falling apart like a bad hairpiece. The bike is the envy of all my friends and has every right to be. I go riding now and with the bikes light frame and great gears I am able to leave them in the back. I haven't let the weekly snow and below freezing temps stop me in the least because these conditions make for an all balls out riding experience. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
christopher
a weekend warrior
from fremont, nh
Date Reviewed: December 15, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
i just picked up the new 98 in nov. i was able to ride 3 times before the
snow came and ruined my fun. the ride is quite stiff. it accelerates
like a 125 motorcross bike, eats uphills and the flats. down can be
rough(read scary)...the t2 judy has been fine so far...nice components...
nice price. high praise so far. i will get back in may when the snow melts
s. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dwayne Sinclair
a weekend warrior
from Dallas, TX
Date Reviewed: November 14, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I just purchased two 1998 Trek 8000 SL's. I bought the bikes for the frames because I believe they are lightweight and very stuff. Problem though - Trek made an early 1998 production run and left off the disc brake mounts which should be included on the 8000, 8500, 8900 SL frame. Current SL frames should include disc brake mounts!!. I'm the silly one for buying early 8-( | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kevin Henderson
a weekend warrior
from Honolulu, HI
Date Reviewed: November 8, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
ROCKIN!!! Thats the way the 98' 8000SL I just bought is turning out. With the killer, tree root, rutted, vertical mountainsides in Hawaii and the tire eating rocks, this bike slides and glides it's way through everything I can through at it. In fact last weekend I went out with a couple of C'Dales and a GT and left them panting for air as I danced around the jungle. Light, rigid with smooth reliable components. Rock ON!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris allbritton
a weekend warrior
from LITTLE ROCK, AR
Date Reviewed: October 4, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I BOUGHT THIS BIKE IN SUMMER 96 AND HAVE NOT HAD ANY PROBLEMS WITH IT. I HAVE CRASHED AND BURNED MANY A TIME BUT THE BIKE HAS MADE IT THROUGH EACH ONE. MY DEALER HAS DONE EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD TO MAKE MY BIKE AS DURABLE AS POSSIBLE. I HAVE RECENTLY PURCHASED A 98 8000SL AND FIND IT TO BE EVEN BETTER. THE COOMPONENTS THAT WERE INCLUDED IN THE PRICE MADE IT A STEAL. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
john landry
a cross-country rider
from Richmond VA
Date Reviewed: September 29, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I recently bent the derailler hanger on my 8000 (never buy aluminum frames w/o a replacable hanger), and my dealer charged me $50 more than Trek's repair charge ($50!) and it took 5 weeks to get back.Trek wouldn't help me. My dealings with the company and the dealer have been infuriating. I will never buy another Trek. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Tinker
a weekend warrior
from Moline, IL
Date Reviewed: September 19, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought this bike in Spring 1996. Liked the yellow paint but it chipped way too easy. Quad 21 was barely adequate, but better than nothing. Trek's inhouse stem/barends/seatpost/handlebars are about as shiny as crome and as ugly. Stock brakes are junk. Switched from gripshift to rapidfire LX at the dealership. however, the LX rapidfire was very inaccurate and required more concentration than should have. Upgraded to XT shifters and brakes. A must have for this bike. Stock tires were a waste of rubber. Switched to WTB Velorapters, much better. I weigh 200 pounds and the stock pedals bent after a few months. The specs for the '97 model is much better, although it comes with incompatabile brake levers and gripshift. Much improved bike over the '96 I had. However, I bought a '97 970 shx and upgraded to rockshox judy xc. The 970 is a better bike. Bontrager components are much better visually and functionally. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
chris
a cross-country rider
from America
Date Reviewed: August 29, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
The bike is great!But, yeah, What's this creaking in the front?
Does anybody know!It gives impression like the alu frame is streching and will tear apart any moment...Any input there?
Thanks!
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Michel Bibeau
a weekend warrior
from Montréal, Québec
Date Reviewed: August 27, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
By far, my 8500 SHX is the best climber I have ever ride. I'm impress everytime I keep myself from putting my feet on the ground on steep climbs and get way up anyway. My main disappointments are the saddle (change that before you walk out the store, don't try it), the Manitou fork (always leaking) and the bar ends (personal taste). But the System 3 hub is perfect, as well as the XT Gruppo.Let me insist : this geometry combined with this stiffness is just perfect for climbing on walls (sorry for the few mispellings, I'm french). | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jason Bartell
a weekend warrior
from Mountain View, CA
Date Reviewed: August 27, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I picked up an 8500SHX about 9 months ago to replace a GT that was hit by a car (while I was on it). I ditched the stock seat and seat post. Both were really heavy and the post wasn't quite long enough for me. I also ditched the stock bar ends in favor of my old Onzas, which is just personal preference. The Trek is a stable downhiller but not as quick turning as some other bikes. Part of this is from a longer top tube and perhaps the head tube angle as well. I dropped some springs into the Manitou and it has been sweet at soaking bumps, washboard and everything else. My only complaints are something up front on the bike creaks under heavy braking. I can't tell if it is the handlebar and stem joint (I have tightened the bolts) or the Manitou. All the XT shifting and braking equipment are still super snappy and work like new. The XT V-Brakes are eyeball suckers. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Rob Ast
a cross-country rider
from Denver, CO
Date Reviewed: August 10, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I got my 97 8000SHX at the beginning of the summer for $950 at Wheatridge cyclery (a great shop with very helpful staff and great prices). I've been riding 2-3 times/week on the flat trails around Denver, and 1-2 times/weekend in the foothills or mountains. After 3 months I can say I LOVE THIS BIKE.
The 8000 climbs great (kick the snot out of my friends on their GT avalanches), handles high speed descents with ease, and is just an overall great ride. I am tall, but my 21 frame remains stiff without being harsh. I plan on replacing my saddle in the near future, but otherwise wouldn't change a thing. Great bike for a good price. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
John
a cross-country rider
from Los Angeles
Date Reviewed: August 10, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I got the 7000 as a frameset from my l.b.s. on close-out for $150. Great deal.
I don't know if the weight differs between the EA60 and the EA70 framesets
(they used to be all EA70, so my 1994 7000 is EA70). My frame is 18 and
weighs 4 lbs. 2 or 3 ounces including the non-qr seatpost clamp and Trek's
anti-chainsuck thing (which works, btw). Angles are pretty standard, with a
23 toptube and 71/73 etc. Note that Trek's geometry is different for its
line of steel bikes. These have shorter top tubes and longer stays. Don't
ask me why.
Overall, I like the frame. very durable, smooth since it is not terribly
oversized. Not really light, so fatigue failure won't be a worry for a long
long time. I have it set up with a 3 travel fork and it wanders a bit on
slow uphills, but I guess that is par for the course, since the long-travel fork slackens
the effective angles.
When I upgrade, I'm probably going to go for a custom 853 steel frame. For
right now though, I'm pretty happy. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
will robinson
a cross-country rider
from
Date Reviewed: July 20, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
basically a decent bike. I'll focus on the frame since that's the major difference from other bikes in its class. (it comes with decent components). Love the geometery! very versitile and raceable too. The 8000, 7000, and 65000 all use the same bonded frame the 8500 uses EA70 in its main tubes. These bonded frames are HEAVY!!!!! stripped it down doing a complete rebuild... always knew my bike was heavy but about 4.5 lbs for a 16.5 Easton aluminum frame, they have got to be joking. also their published weights are sheer lunacy. throw one on a scale, you'll see. there are pretty sweet steel frames that weigh less and handle just as well. I'd give it 4 stars for geometery but deduct one for no replaceable derailleur hangar and deduct one for weight. | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
$Chris$
a cross-country rider
from Canada
Date Reviewed: July 16, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Well, 've been ridin' grey '96 8000shx for a bit over two weeks now and I love it!!! Good frame material (Easton ProGram (could be ProGram 2 or 3, but hey - we're talkin' only $2000 here (for complete bike w/upgrades))) and its geometry. Very juicy in handling and speed. And climbing... well, I'll be damned - It puts a smile on my face when I go up the hill seating and enjoying surrounding panorama while people on huffy'ies and cheap OTHER bikes have to get off the bike and sweat it the way up (or go around the hill if possible...). To make ma bike lookin' and actin' cool i've put some upgrades on it (and i ain't done yet!!!). First thing was a fork (phhr - Qudra21...yah!) - On the front, suspended from the frame there is nice, red Bomber Z2, which handles so great, i wonder why... (If ya want get atom bomb, but spend extra money for nothing. Z2 might be heavy, but I still can lift ma bike with an index finger, got some more front traction on climbing, too). The other stuff: RED (like Z2) Ritchey brake pads, Full LX/XT and Flite Ti saddle. Now I'm gonna be slowly upgrading to full XT and some suspension seatpost, but for now I'm extremely happy with the current setup. Good work Trek!!! (oh! the paint! With the Flat Grey had no problems yet whatsoever!!! Don't buy yellow (You'll be sorry...)).gee, that's kinda long review, gotta cut itone more thing, I just wanna thank few people on this site for helping me with choosin' the bike and components. Thanks a lot guys (upcc, Christian, LeeK , JOhn, JohnA., and others). Special thanks to Francois for making this all possible. Y'all made one guy very happy!!!Well, I won't be wastin' no more K's and I go ridin' (nice and sweaty outhere) | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
JohnA.
a weekend warrior
from New Jersey
Date Reviewed: July 15, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
After having a '96 8000shx for about 3 months now I must say that I'm very pleased with it. The bike is fairly light with a Judy, and is plenty stiff for me. I've ridden it on some pretty tough trails and the bike has handled it well. The paint on my '96 gets scratched easily, but I think it's my fault more than it is Trek's. Nice Bike. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jay Wnuk
a cross-country rider
from Winona, MN
Date Reviewed: July 11, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought my '97 Trek 8000SHX in april of this year. Since then I have put
over 900 hard miles on it. It is so much fun to ride that I use it for 60-70
mile road trips as well as off road. The handling of the frame and the
excellent feel and stiffness make it a joy to ride on our local trails.
(Some of which are considered expert.) I feel the frame is so good that
instead of buying a $2000.00 bike I bought the 8000 and outfitted it with
mostly XTR components. See you later, time to ride!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Geoff
a cross-country rider
from MN
Date Reviewed: July 10, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I have a 95 8000shx w/ Judy DH (with spring/elastomer upgrade), I think the original Quad21 were junk. Not responsive, and not enough travel. It seems though since 95, the components are getting worse by year, my friend has a 96 8000shx, and it came with stx/stx rc/Deore LX components. My 8000 came with all LX, with XT rear derailuer, added LX brakes (verses STX-rc it came with)and added SPD747. Also Trek is cutting cost and adding weight by using System 1 compo, instead of System 2/3 found on earlier 8000 series. Far as ride goes, for an Alum frame, it's really soft (compared to Klien Pulse or Schwinn Homegrown XT hard tail). Sometimes I wish it was little stiffer, especially when on hard pack trails. Plus side, when I go down hilling on it, the soft frame makes the ride smoother at 40+mph. This bike is definately good bang for the buck back in 95 (I paid $1300 including Judy DH/LX brakes), but 96/97 seems somewhat expensive considering the components it comes with. Also what's the deal with Trek's 97 logo? It's pretty damm ugly. I love my Trek, but wouldn't buy another one, the new ones just stink of cheapness. The 95's came with nice clearcoat on the frame to prevent chipping, but the new ones are just painted, and the frame chips like mad, and looks crappy after few miles. It seems Trek is now charging premium just have the name 'Trek' on the bikes :(back in 95, this bike was a steal, now in 97, not enough bike for the buck. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris
a cross-country rider
from MI
Date Reviewed: June 30, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Sorry to disagree with everyone but I dont think this bike a good value at all. I think anyone would be better off spending that money on a high end Cannondale or a Schwin. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Sam Messina
a weekend warrior
from Brick, NJ
Date Reviewed: June 28, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I love this bike, my two best friends have them, and honestly it blows my GT right off of the trail. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Yosuke
a weekend warrior
from Oregon
Date Reviewed: June 21, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I have a 95 8700 (Carbon tubes bonded to alminum lugs) with a Manitou EFC up front. The bike is amazing...much better than my cheap previous bike, which was a Trek 830. No preblem with it...only one time that the chain sucked, and that was my fault. I crash, and it's great. The forks really help a lot, even though the frame's got some damping. Cool bike | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Krazzee Kooter
a cross-country rider
from Chicago,Illinois
Date Reviewed: June 2, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I have a 92 Trek 8000 I bought used with no suspension and I love it! It is the best handling bike I have ever ridden. Very responsive. And a great hill climber. The frames are indestructible and I should know because I'm 6'5 and 215 lbs. and am hell on bikes. I did however break the front stem after a particularly brutal trail ride, but it was replaced immediately under factory warranty. The front triple butted for is indestructible also. As a mater of fact I'm thinking of getting a new bike this summer and if I don't buy full suspension I'll probably get another 8000, but with suspension this time. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
LAUREN
a racer
from CANADA
Date Reviewed: May 16, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I just bought a 1997 8000 shx....and do I ever like it!
The specs. and frame is what makes this bike. This bike is a BLAST to
ride. It corners great...and fast on the descents and the best on the
climbing!
S..W..E..E..T BIKE FOR YOUR MONEY
Nice Job TREK. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Powys Gadd
a racer
from Silver City, NM
Date Reviewed: May 2, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
My 1996 Trek 8500 took me to 2nd place in the NMORS for beginner women (not enough for a Vet class). In terms of weight and handling, it far outweighed my t my Bridgestone. The Manitou Mach V shocks were a bit stiff but after only a week, they rode well. Busted my bottom bracket after only 11 months but I'm an animal out there and Trek replaced it free of charge (another good reason to get a bike with a lifetime warranty. The color grows on you but never leave this bike behind a bush-you'll never find it again. I chose this bike over a lot of others I've seen at races and after countless discussions with expert and pro riders, aluminum or cro-moly with Shimano XT components is the way to go. This is my third Trek frame. My first was a 1981 cro-moly roade bike outfitted with Campy Record component. The bike shop offered me $300 for it last week. No way would I sell it. Purchased a Trek 2300 road bike last year too. Trek has never let me down! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Gary
a cross-country rider
from Canada
Date Reviewed: April 19, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I just bought a '97 8000. I haven't had much chance to ride it yet, ( April 19th and it snowed today!) I bought the bike because of its light weight and value.
Nice aluminum frame and XT rear derailleur.
I can't understand the choice of some of the components. Why would Trek put the super short LX brake levers on a bike with GripShift? They don't mesh, the levers are too far in.
Secondly, the bike seems quite long. My 16.5 model has a 23 top tube. I'm 5'8 and feel very stretched out.
Someone else mentioned the Bontrager Banana shaped seat, if you hang your butt over the rear wheel you get this ridge from the seat knifing into your gut.If anyone feels the same it would be great to hear from you.
Gary gsuth@spanit.com | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bob Hylka
a cross-country rider
from Joliet, IL USA
Date Reviewed: April 19, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
You never forget your first bike!! What more can I say about my trusty Trek that everyone else has said. My '93 came with xt/lx, and my Matrix wheels are STILL true. Too bad Trek downgraded on components a little. This is a gem. Take a good look. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
sp
a
from cross-country rider
Date Reviewed: April 6, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I've been swapping components between different frames for the last 2 years, and I finally made a decision I regret on every ride. My 8000 was gradually upgraded last year to full XT, but I didn't get to ride it much. Late in the year I found what I thought I wanted-a nice cro-mo frame. OH WHAT DID I DO?! Yep. Sold the Trek. Man do I miss it. The steel bike is fine, a little heavier. But the combination of weight and strength, the geometry and handling of the Trek are missed. I guess it just bugged me riding a mass produced frame. The drop outs are a little soft and are not replaceable and the rear cable stops are not split on the Trek. Looking back, they don't mean a thing because I was a better rider on that frame. Don't be put off by the mass market aspect. This is (in my opinion) the best frame on the market from the value aspect. I don't think any aluminum frame is tougher, some are lighter, many more unique, none are sold by a better company. Value and looks make it seem like just another frame. Hop on and ride, then try to justify spending more. I can afford to spend more on a bike, but after a point it becomes silly because it is just for show. I would rather invest (also) in a comparable quality road bike (like a Trek 1220) and know that I didn't spend extra to impress myself or others. I've found that Shimano XT level and this frame give me all the things I'm looking for. Thanks for your time. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dean
a cross-country rider
from Canada
Date Reviewed: April 3, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
The 97 8000 kicks ass.Great price for value. If your like me and you love it when people stare and dream at your bike then you might want to invest in the 5 following things that I did.
-97 Judy SL
-Race Face crank (yellow of course!)
-XT front Derailer
-Any other seat that isnt banana shaped
-97 XT rapid fires
With these upgrades my bike has to be one of the best in the world(with the best rider!)
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jimbo
a cross-country rider
from CA, UT, & MO
Date Reviewed: March 15, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought my 8000 in 1990 and have put multiple thousands of miles on it riding the hils of So. Cal., singletrack and slickrock all over the state of Utah, and the best Missouri (pronounced MISERY) has to offer (which isn't much). The bike has taken me places that blow the mind and survived torture that should have left it a twisted heap of wreckage. Some parts have worn out over the last 7 years of course, but nothing expired prematurely. My sled excells on soft twisty singletrack and steep climbs especially when slickrock is involved. The stiffness of the frame that helps the climbs also rattles your brain on speedy washboards though. I did have what i thought was a small crack develop where the top and seat tubes are butted at the head tubes (after 5 years of complete abuse). Perhaps the tubes were just settling, I don't know. Trek promptly took the frame back to the factory, checked it over &/or repaired it, and sent it back with a new paint job which was badly needed--and I never even sent in the warrenty registration card when it was new. This bike was the best investment I have ever made and is still going strong. The folks at Trek were also top notch when I had a claim. (now if it just didn't make me blind after those 40 mph washboards!) | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
P.T. Reynolds
a weekend warrior
from Japan
Date Reviewed: February 12, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I actually have an 1996 8500 SHX. Great bike. Frame is lively, light, and true. Shimano XT grupo right on. Grew up on Campy eqiuiped Italian high-end road bikes so have been around. Out of the box, the bike hauls ass. Mac 5 SX forks - not one problem. Paint job is cool color (dry gold dust) but scratches easily. Bummer. Also, Systems 2 seatpost looks Mickey Mouse but works fine. Other than that, no complaints, but it's the only mountain bike I've ever owned. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jon A. Nordal
a cross-country rider
from Oslo Norway
Date Reviewed: January 17, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I got a 8000 SHX spring 96. I am satisfied with the bike, exept for the
paint! I am upgrading to XT V-brakes this spring. The Matrix Swami rims
are great!
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mike
a weekend warrior
from Houston
Date Reviewed: January 15, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Since 1991, I have owned 3 Trek frame sets.Trek 7000, 8000 and currently an 8500.
The 7000 broke at the BB, replaced by the 8000 under warranty. The 8000 gave way to chain suck, replaced by the 8500 under Trek's crash replacement. Trek orginally gave me a lot for my money and has been very good about standing behind their product. Each of the 2 times I've gotten a new frame I've considered hi-end alternatives such as IBIS or Merlin, but Trek's warranty dept. has made this a tough choice, with the 8000 being $free and the 8500 for $350.00. By going the mass produced route, I've been able to spend more $ on components. The frameset gets 4 stars, but I think Trek as a company deserves 5. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ter Chyan Tan
a weekend warrior
from Singapore
Date Reviewed: December 28, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
Great bike, the 8000, fast, stiff and great climber. In the process of upgrading it to full XT. Now spoilt by my merlin frame, but will definately take it out very soon, once its complete again. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Matt G.
a cross-country rider
from Atlanta, GA
Date Reviewed: December 11, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
I have a 1996 8500 with the Manitou Mach V sx (exactly like the one pictured above). It's 3 months old now and it's getting broken in well. I've had a few minor things go wrong: 1. the fork creaked - LBS fixed. 2. the Bontrager seat creaked - LBS upgraded to a San Marco Ti. 3. the System 3 front hub squeeked from day 1, LBS has tried to fix it and can't, they're waiting on an OK from the TREK rep to replace it. (minus one chili pepper for waiting) Don't get me wrong, I love this bike. It climbs incredibly, the fork is totally sweet, full XT is nice, and the V-brakes will put my 200 lbs over the bar if I use more than 1 finger. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jim Robinette
a cross-country rider
from sd, ca
Date Reviewed: October 16, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
I have a 1996 trek 8500 with a Judy xc on the front. I like this bike because of the stiffness, however on a really rough trail it can be beat you. This is an inherent problem with 7000 series aluminum, other manufacturers such as: manitou, yeti, and felt feel the same. The stiffness is best felt when climbing, this bike climbs GREAT. Components vs Price vs Warranty vs Trek name makes this a sound decision. The other bikes I was considering buying were Specialized M2 Fs Comp, Lightspeed ti, Giant atx890, Cannondale f700. The trek won out; however, if I had it to do over I would buy a Gary Fisher Joshua Y bike (also owned by Trek). Overall the 8500 was a good buy it cost me $1,499.00 and a joshau y would have been $1,799.00 RIDE BOTH, THEN DECIDE yourself. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ethan
a cross-country rider
from Radford VA
Date Reviewed: August 27, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
model: 8500
Great frame + great components at an (relatively) affordable price.
What more could you want? Easton premium aluminum frame is very light
and stiff. Complete XT components (incl. XT V-brakes) have held up great.
No problems whatsoever. My only upgrade has been the saddle, which I
upgraded from the crappy heavy Bontrager, to a Flite Ti saddle which
is the best saddle I have owned! Manitou Mach V SX is great and I have
had no problems with it. Cushy and reliable..... Great bike!
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris van Eyck
a cross-country rider
from NY
Date Reviewed: August 5, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
I'm riding a '93 Trek 8000. After riding many bikes, I've yet to find one that
matches this bike's performance. Long top tube, short chainstays, and conservative
geometry combine to provide a bicycle that is raceable, comfortable, yet stiff.
If you're in the market for a great Easton sluminum bike, check this one out.
Your first upgrade should be a suspension fork, to temper the bike's stiff ride. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kai Backstrom
a weekend warrior
from Espoo, Finland
Date Reviewed: June 24, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
I'm riding a '95 Trek 8000. The terrain in the nearest forest is filled with roots, and my bike gets a hell of a beating. I have upgraded some parts to my bike like a Hope-front hub and a Mavic frontrim, a Manitou Magnum tuned by Wings, etc.
The bike handels great especially on fast trails, it gives me the crisp feel that this is a bike I can trust. It climbes good too, because of the rigid frame. A shock up front is useful if your in the market for this bike.
No complaints, except for the damn brakes. Happy trails. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
M.Delle a cross-country rider
a
from Halle, GERMANY
Date Reviewed: April 27, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
The best bike I've ever had. Fantastic weight. Cool Color (Ice-Red).
Brakes could be better (STX-RC). Never mind. Best thing !!!
| | Overall Rating: |
| |
|
Photo Caption Contest
(sponsored by Maxxis)
|
Enter here
|
|
|
$ 1100.00
