Fully independent cross country suspension at a hardtail weight. Alpha SLR aluminum in a Pro Race geometry. Carbon fiber seat stays are a lightweight upgrade.
Rolf Dolomite Tubeless gives you strength and durability at a lower spoke count and lighter weight.
Rock Shox SID XC fork (80mm travel) and Fox Float R rear air shock (up to 3" of rear wheel travel) are dialed for XC racing.
Bontrager Race crank and Shimano XT/XTR 9-speed shifting.
Submitted by
tesse3
a Cross Country Rider
from Charleston, SC, USA Date Reviewed: November 24, 2008
Favorite Trail:
Bent Creek
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Price Paid:
$750.00
Purchased At:
E-bay
Strengths:
Lightweight, Seems to be fairly durable considering I'm a 6'5" 205lb rider and haven't broken anything yet. Great components
Weaknesses:
Rims not disc compatible. Spacing of the Rolf Dolomite spokes makes it easy to pick up sticks. Have bent 2 derailleur hangers and wrecked the XTR derailleur.
Similar Products Used:
Previous bike was Trek 930 Singletrack. No comparison
Bike Setup:
Stock except the horrible Bontrager seat.
Bottom Line:
Bike was almost new when I picked it up online. Couldn't be happier. Great on X-country and the NC mountains. Would definitely recommend
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Michael
a Cross Country Rider
from Brandon, Manitoba, Canada Date Reviewed: April 3, 2008
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$800.00
Purchased At:
private sale
Strengths:
Fairly lightweight, the fox shock is easy to adjust, quality components, looks good
Weaknesses:
The rolf dolomite rims are very easy to bend out of shape and break. The Rockshox Judy makes a clicking sound when it compresses
Similar Products Used:
Rocky Mountain Hammer race, Trek 4500
Bike Setup:
Trek Fuel 98 frame, Trek Fuel 100 rear carbon triangle, XT Drive Train, swalbe Racing Ralph Tires, Spd Petals, Rolf Dolomite Front rim, Mavic Crossmax Rear rim (the dolomite broke), Rockshox Judy
Bottom Line:
This is the best bike that I have ever ridden, it climbs hills just as fast as any hardtail bike and, if adjusted properly, will shift instantly. My one disappointment with it was the flimsiness of the Rolf Dolomite rims, they broke after I landed sideways on a bunny hop (They might have been cracked for a while though). If you are looking to by a great bike for single track this is it, especailly if you can get it for as inexpensive As I did... Five Chillis for value because it only cost $800 and Four chilis because the rim broke.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
dave
a Cross Country Rider
from boise Date Reviewed: November 25, 2007
Duration Product Used:
More than 3 years
Price Paid:
$1500.00
Purchased At:
IMT
Strengths:
great traction
Weaknesses:
as original no stable platform
Similar Products Used:
many
Bike Setup:
marzocchi mx fork, really "SAFE" eggbeater clipless pedals, xt crank,avid single digit 7 rim brakes, mavic crossland wheelset with python UST tires.
Bottom Line:
changed out to tubeless UST as it is ignorant to not realize the vast improvement over tube crap.Recently unretired the frameset from my attic and am going to build it up for my stepson, really tempted to keep it for my self with some upgrades, alas I caanor afford to tkae care of 3 bikes.All bikes have differeent advantages this bike having semi active rear suspension has the effect of the rear wheel being pushed down to claw for traction on really steep technical climbs which even now few bikes are capable of. I am going to upgrade to avid BB7s.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
ray stern
a Cross Country Rider
from tempe, az, usa Date Reviewed: December 24, 2005
Favorite Trail:
pemberton
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Price Paid:
$2100.00
Strengths:
Low weight, beautiful suspension.
Weaknesses:
She's a fickle shifter.
Similar Products Used:
none
Bike Setup:
Got rid of stock seat and put something more comfy for my late 30s butt. Also got rid of tubeless tires and clipless pedals, which are dangerous.
Bottom Line:
This is the best cross country mountain bike money can buy. I give it a workout 2-3 times a week on tough, technical Phoenix-area trails and it performs flawlessly. Highly recommended. It's the most expensive bike I've ever bought by far, so basically it's my dream bike and I haven't been disappointed. It makes me want to ride it.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Mike
a Racer
from Lincoln, NE, USA Date Reviewed: October 11, 2004
Favorite Trail:
Peaks Trail - Brekenridge
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$2200.00
Purchased At:
Bike Barn, Houston TX
Strengths:
The frame on this bike is fantastic as is the suspension design
Weaknesses:
The stock seat is laughable for this caliber of bike. The tires could have a little more agressive pattern, but both are easily changed out.
Similar Products Used:
Specialized Stumpjumber FSR Comp Kona King Kikapu
Bike Setup:
Pretty much stock except for the seat and post
Bottom Line:
I bought this used as a demo model from Bike Barn, but after riding it over a month now I'd wouldn't hesitate to pay full price. It's an incredible ride once everthing's dialed in. My first full suspension mtn bike and now I'm glad I didn't go with another hard tail. I could go on and on but you need to ride one to know what I (and everyone else) is talking about. It rocks! Kudos to Trek.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Brad
a Racer
from Pennsylvania Date Reviewed: April 1, 2004
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$800.00
Purchased At:
EBAY
Strengths:
XT/XTR, SID XC FRONT FORK, FOX REAR SHOCK, ROLF RIMS, QUALITY TREK BUILD,
Weaknesses:
NONE AT ALL
Similar Products Used:
2001 TREK STP 300
Bike Setup:
Easton Handlebars, and Bar Ends, Race Face stem, Thomson Seatpost, Panaracer Trailblaster Tires
Bottom Line:
This is a great bike for racing. I've had no luck at all. If you want a quality bike get a TREK. If Lance Armstrong's Tour de France wins haven't sent out a message, hopefully this will. I recommend this bike only for experienced riders. If you still like to bike consider a TREK 8000. MSRP $1149.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Barry
a Cross Country Rider
from Memphis, TN Date Reviewed: February 21, 2004
Favorite Trail:
Herb Parsons
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$1400.00
Purchased At:
Penn Cycle, Minnetonka MN
Strengths:
Smooooth ride,going from no suspension to full is a real treat. quick reponse, excellent stability on downhills. Good component mix.
Weaknesses:
Tires lousy in mud but excellent on hardpacked or rocky ground, Stock Seat is only fair. Bike set up was excellent with little or no adjustment needed after the first few rides. Hey its a Trek so they don't skimp on the price but buying it new after it sat at the dealer for 2 years gave me a great deal.
Similar Products Used:
Specilized Full suspension offerings, Cannondale etc. I shopped a lot for this bike.
Bike Setup:
Stock w/ Bar ends and Upgraded saddle.
Bottom Line:
This bike is an excellent riding bike for someone who rides a lot of cross country. Transitioning from my old Bridgestone MB2 (circa 1989) this was a massive change. Down hills once a challange, are now welcomed and rough fast trails take a lot less concentration to pick the best line. Getting used to all the gadgetry took some time.
Uphills took the most getting used too. Hammering out of the saddle up a hill is almost out of the question. Learning how to stay in the saddle and let the bike work for you is a trick this old dog needs to continue learning. But don't get me wrong this bike will climb very well the person in the seat remembers how to ride it. Components work flawlessley.
A lot of reviews dis the wheels but I am almost 200 and they remain true as the day I bought them. I admit to avoiding big drops and jumps but this is a cross country bike not a downhill or trials. Abuse this beauty and it will not be happy with you.
Overall the bike is a whole lot better than this rider deserves but it sure is fun.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jason
a Cross Country Rider
from SLC, UT. USA Date Reviewed: April 22, 2003
Favorite Trail:
Great Western
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$1300.00
Purchased At:
MTBR Classified
Strengths:
Too many to list!
Weaknesses:
None
Similar Products Used:
Owned a Klien Adept & Trek 6000
Bike Setup:
01 98 Fuel Factory Race specific; SID SL, CHRIS KING, MONKEY LITE XC, SRAM 9.0 DRIVETRAIN, FOX FLOAT RL, URRACO RIMS W/ HAYES DISC.
Bottom Line:
I don't know if I can add anything more to the previous reviews, but I wanted to give my two cents. I have ridden a few different bikes and the Fuel is, by far, my favorite suspension design. It is a single pivot design and has a very progressive suspension feel. It is not active feeling, like a Gary Fisher or Klein, it is more behind the scenes... you don't even notice it there, that is, until you launch off a 2' rock going 20 mph! and land on, what seems, to be a cloud of air! It is smooth and climbs like a hartail, in has a longer top tube and wheel base, which makes is very stable on fast decents! It really shines when it come to the fast stuff! It is light and the SLR aluminum is stiff. I like the look of the newer models with the full carbon frame, however, for the price and durability I had to go with the 01 model. In addition, the component spec's are great. I especially like the Rolf wheelset. I have used the stock Dolomite and loved them, but, my Urraco's are the best! I am about 200pds and like to ride fast and hard, the disc brakes are perfect for my wieght and riding style. I wasn't too interested in Disc brakes, but this bike came with them... and I wasn't going to take them off... after riding with them on a few rides, I can't go back to rim brakes. Not to mention the Urraco's are lighter than the Dolomites and they are disc??? Nice... If your thinking about a full suspension ride, you can't go wrong with a FUEL! Enough said!!!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Andy
a Weekend Warrior
from Chico, CA USA Date Reviewed: December 23, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Bidwell Park High and Low
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$1750.00
Purchased At:
Campus Bicycles
Strengths:
Lightweight, manueverable, no bob.
Weaknesses:
Shifting difficulty due to continued cable stretch and noisy Dolomite hubs.
Similar Products Used:
Fuel 90, Sugar 2, Specialized FSR.
Bike Setup:
XT/XTR, Rolf Dolomite, Bontrager spattering of components, SID front, FOX rear. Pretty much off the shelf.
Bottom Line:
Still assessing this ride, but thus far, a pretty good load for the buck.
I rode a Ritchey Ascent for 15 years, so this bike will have to prove itself over time. I agonized over the switch to full suspension for three years. Had to finally make a decision, before my wife kicked me out of the house. "If you don't pick one, I will" Because 3k - 4k was out of the realm of puchase power I elected to target the sub 2k market. Mind you my wife was willing to go down the Titus and Ellesworth roads, but my conscious couldn't do it. Maybe some day.
Weight. This bike is light and has changed my riding style. Light front end requires more agression to the trail. I ride more WITH this bike. My Ritchey is kind of fight, but I was very used to it. The Fuel will easily "step" over just about anything you can throw at it. I have the supsension set up on the stiff side. I don't feel like I have to muscle myself and the bike. I just worry about staying on and the bike takes care of itself. I am an aggressive rider more entertained by picking lines through extremely rocky territory. The suspension allows more mistakes but accelerates you up the trail when your having one of those well focused rides.
Suspension. Amazingly resilient and accommodating for downhilling the reverse trail. I keep about 75 psi in the front and 2/3 my body weight in the Fox (about 145 psi) I consistently pack around 2 bucks. The suspension did not really astound me, but it did take my aggression to a higher level. No doubt, FS will make you a perceivably better, more confident, less abused rider.
The wheels are strong period. I hit 'em hard, and the wheels stay true. I knew about the hub issues with the Rolfe's but I decided to trust the "system" The rear hub started grinding after only 5 or 6 rides. I'll burn these things up then consider a different wheelset after the bike get's more of a thrashin'. LBS just tightened 'em up. We'll see. I immediately got rid of the whimpy tires and broke a sweat installing my new meats. Fortunately for me, I have had only one flat tire on a ride, in 15 years. I credit that to lots of rubber between the ride and the trail. I will say that changing a tire is a chore. I spend a lot of time trying to get the bead to sit in the right place on those wheels.
I cut an inch off the bars. Way too wide. Cornering is much easier now. May need to switch out the bars for some downhillers. My lower back is stretching getting worked; just a bit too far. Shifting has been a frustration. LBS adjusts once a month, but cable stretch has got to stop.
The only two times I crashed were due to my lack of physical ability to deal with the clipless pedals. My neighbor says I'm a loser, but I put my cages on anyway, because I couldn't physically afford to go down again.
For the price, this bike delivers. I expect to break the components that won't last and enjoy the ones that do. I also supect that I will get another hardtail one of these days for variety and the unwillingness to let the old school go.
I'm just a dude who loves riding almost as much as my wife and kids and this bike takes me out to the wild and brings me home. That's all I can ask for.
For those who are weighing the investment versus return, this bike is a good investment. No buyer's remorse and it will continue to deliver through repeated beatings. I continue to put this bike to the test with full throttle hard riding and it delivers. This bike gets four flamin' chilis just because I think it needs more testing time. I'll be back on this site to rate the bike after a round of winter riding and another season of spring and summer riding, to provide a more longterm look.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Kevin
a Cross Country Rider
from San Diego CA Date Reviewed: August 17, 2002
Favorite Trail:
hmmm....
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$1250.00
Purchased At:
Bike USA San Diego
Strengths:
Handles very well even in loose eroded terrain. Predictable firm ride and very good climber. Very fun. Quiet drivetrain (I use white lightning) and I like the Bontrager Jones AC tires. Fast through turns and climbs
Weaknesses:
Threw chain alot when shifting to granny gear...pivoted front derailler very slightly in around seat tube to minimize. Had creaking noise fixed by massively lubing seat post. Rolf rims harder to true than normal. V brakes are a little weak on extended downhill. Stock fork does not really soak up Big Hits but should it?
I wiegh 155 and ride Fox Float @ 105-125lbs. Bike is stock.
Bottom Line:
Still very happy with bike. Mabey the best XC bike for the price
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Ian Barta
a Cross Country Rider
from Guelph, Ontario, Canada Date Reviewed: August 2, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Arkel Loop
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$1875.00
Purchased At:
Ziggys
Strengths:
Good overall groupo for the cash. Wheels are resilient! Beat them senseless and they still run true (I'm 185lbs) Tight & light suspension (SID & Fox) including easy set up
Weaknesses:
Massive Bar (25"!) Tough to get regular tires to sit in the Bontranger rims. Trek, with their long top tube, need a Medium/Large frame, say 18.5". Paint is, besides ugly, soft. I can chip the paint with a well placed fart.
Similar Products Used:
Test rode Sugar, Specialized & Klein Old Bike: Rocky Mountain Vapor
Bike Setup:
Replaced Crank & Rings with RaceFace Turbine - which ironically sucks due to zero thread engagement of granny gear bolts to crank - come on RaceFace! Time Aluminum pedals - yea! 110mm stem (short) Panaracer tires
Bottom Line:
Overall, money well spent. I have still yet to corner as tight as on my old Rocky (hardtail). I believe this is caused by two factors. One, the long Trek top tube and the increased turning radius it imposes. And two, the 18 spoke front wheel (2001 model), combined with the SID air front fork, create a more flexible steering mechanism than I am used to. It doesn't break, just feels a little to soft. On long rides, however, I could care less about a 0.25second in corners. After a 2 or 4 day mountain biking vacation, I feel like kissing this bike. Full suspension is so nice. With respect to climing I can't tell the difference - remember your legs & heart are much more important than a 1/2" of bob. For me, this bike really balances the world of performance with a decent amount of give when required. Trek has done a good job.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jeff
a
from Wall, NJ, USA Date Reviewed: July 24, 2002
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$1550.00
Purchased At:
MTBR Classified
Strengths:
very responsive climber, just enough to take the edge off the bumps
Similar Products Used:
Trek YSL200 (my old bike), Sugar1, Superlight
Bike Setup:
bike was purchased from MTBR, was Trek regional race team spec'd, Hayes Disc brakes, SRAM, Rolf Urraco wheels, Fox Vanilla RC, SID SL, Time ATACs, Panaracer XC
Bottom Line:
I had a YSL200, I am 220lbs, without locking out the suspension, climbing was lame. I got tired of my buddy blowing me away on climbs with his Sugar1. The handling is quick, well balanced, suspension is great, has lockouts, but really do not need them at all. My 2nd front SID, getting tired of trying to find the sweet spot, but overall very happy with performance. I see a tremendous difference in climbing, the single largest advantage over the old Y. I was really on the fence with the fuel or sugar, the fuel set up fit me a bit better. Overall, I am still amazed at the difference in performance every time I get on it. This is a great XC bike!!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Bruce
a Racer
from Felton, CA, USA Date Reviewed: June 10, 2002
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$2000.00
Strengths:
This bike is light and strong. The Dolomite wheels are strong and only needed one small tweak in 10 months and 1200 off-road miles.
Weaknesses:
None, really
Similar Products Used:
Santa Cruz SL, Rocky Mountain Carve
Bike Setup:
Stock except for rear swingarm (2002 carbon swingarm), tires (using Panaracer Fire XC), and pedals (Speedplay Frogs)
Bottom Line:
This bike is great. It's a wonderful climber and handles high-speed singletrack with ease. Every time I ride this bike, I'm glad I got it.
I've raced this bike and it's a fast, agile bike.....way faster than my abilities. It's also light enough for hike-a-bike parts of race courses.
If you're a XC racer or someone that likes climbing, the Fuel is the way to go.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Freddie
a Cross Country Rider
from Harbor City, CA, U.S.A. Date Reviewed: April 23, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Backbone/Sullivan Loop
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$1500.00
Purchased At:
Helen's Bike Shop
Strengths:
Little, if any, bobbing while hammering in the dirt. Trek dialed in just the right amount of suspension for me: Enough to take the sting out of big hits but very quiet otherwise.
Weaknesses:
Creaky seat tube (see explanation and fix below), tab on the replaceable dropout that the "B" tension screw rests on is too short.
Similar Products Used:
None for full suspension. Other bike is a Specialized Stumpjumper Pro with Raceface and XT/XTR 8 speed stuff.
Bike Setup:
Stock except for switch to Hutchinson Python Airlights (incredible tires), correct size ultralight tubes (Trek specs the bike with 26x1.5 tubes, Bontrager Racelite flat bar (new style with 7 degree bend, 600mm length), WTB SST.98 saddle
Bottom Line:
Bought this bike since my l.b.s. (Helen's Cycles, Manhattan Beach) had a left over 2001 Fuel 98 at a dirt cheap price. I'm happy with my purchase now that I've worked out the kinks on the bike.
Problem #1 that I encountered is that the tab on the replaceable dropout is too short. So, if you try and screw in the "B" tension screw on the XTR rear derailleur so that the upper jockey pulley clears the biggest cog when you're in the granny chainring, biggest rear cog combination, it simply slips off the tab before you're able to screw it in far enough. Mountain Bike (March 2002) details the fix for this problem for this very bike and it took care of the problem for me. The fix basically involves getting a longer screw with a larger head from your local hardware store and installing it in backwards.
Problem #2 that I encountered was that my seat tube was creaking like mad after only about a month of riding. At first I thought is was the bottom bracket or the Bonty crank. That wasn't the case. Then I thought it was the pivots so I called the technical department at TREK. Kevin in technical informed me that it probably wasn't the pivots. He stated that since a Fuel frame does not have a seat tube that is a single diameter all the way down, a gap where the two tubes meet frequently causes creaking. He recommended using loctite 680 to solve the problem. If you are having the same creaking problem coming from your seat tube area, give Kevin a call and he'll guide you through the very simple process to eliminate the problem. He's very friendly and easy to talk to. It worked for me and now my bike is silent!
With the above problems eliminated, my bike is a joy to ride and I'm looking forward to racing it in XC events this summer. Because of the great deal I got, my value rating is top notch. However, the overall rating drops two chilis because although the aforementioned problems are fairly easy to remedy, they should not have been there in the first place.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Wayne Foster
a Weekend Warrior
from Burlington Ontario Canada Date Reviewed: March 4, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Minising Algonquin Park
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$1600.00
Purchased At:
New World
Strengths:
Very fast XC racing bike. Plush ride because air suspension is fully adjustable. Hardly no bob.
Weaknesses:
Tough to get the front wheel up compared to my old Specialized Rockhopper. Dosen't climb quite as good as my Rockhopper. Front Rolf wheel started to squeal. Had to loosen off the lateral adjustment. Bent small Bonty chain ring ??? Sid is flexy but it dosen't seenm to matter on the trail
Similar Products Used:
Specialized Rockhopper
Bike Setup:
Monkey Lites handlebars
Bottom Line:
Fast! This bike comes into its own when the speed gets up. The faster you ride it the better it feels. Not the best in slower technical because the front wheel is tough to lift compared to other bikes. Not a bike for lazy Sunday rides. This bike has a long wheelbase for a 19.5 inch frame that probably makes it so stable at speed.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Singletrack Mind
a Cross Country Rider
from NY, USA Date Reviewed: October 8, 2001
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Overall XC ride is excellent. Handling is quick, responsive, and predictable. Climbs better than my hardtail. Suspension is quiet.
Weaknesses:
Bontreger (enough said).
Similar Products Used:
Kona King
Bike Setup:
Dumped Bontreger parts, except the seat. All XTR, ChrisKing H/S, Thompson post & stem, Panaracer, R/S SID-SL, and Time.
Bottom Line:
I am now at about 800 (hard) miles on my 2001 Trek Fuel 98, and it is starting to show the ware of a season. I have not had any further problems my Fuel98 (other than the Hub problem), besides a couple teeth missing on the large chain ring, and other than the Rolf rear hub coming loose once again. The problem with the Rolf wheels is due to the hub design that Rolf uses, and the way the freehub mates with the hub. It is a simple fix, but you will need a huge allen key (along with a long box-end wrench for leverage) and the standard hub wrenches. You will need to tork the hell out of the freehub/allen assembly, and you should be good for a few hundred miles. If you still have any lateral movement, you need to tork it more!
I am amazed every time I spin the rear Rolf Domolite wheel, it is still straight (one tiny blip). I have never had a set of wheels last this long. I am now a true beliver of the paired spoke technology! According to my LBS, Trek is aware of the problem with the Domolite wheels, I guess that is why Trek has dropped Rolf for 2002. This could be a problem for all those who need service/parts for Rolf wheels in the US.
Bottom line, I would buy another Trek Fuel.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Alexander McNeer
a Cross Country Rider
from Rochester, Michigan Date Reviewed: October 4, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Monarch Crest
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$2000.00
Purchased At:
Kinetic Systems
Strengths:
This bike has great lines. Climbs like a dream, remains stable on the downhills. Cornering is average, however I am a tall rider. Good travel and response with the SID XC and FOX Float R.
Weaknesses:
One word BONTRAGER! Crank creak, pedals? Replaced them immediately. As the handle bars and stem. Seat was great for the first 500 miles, however the gel started to sag off to the side. The Rolf Dolomite aren't bad, I have broken a few spokes, however that is the only problem that I have had. I has been a fairly dry summer, so the stock tires have been fine. I will need to change that as the conditions change. I would love some CrossMax's though!
Similar Products Used:
Titus Racer X, Specialized FSR M4
Bike Setup:
XT/XTR, Race Face Stem, Easton Carbon bars, King Headset, Thompson post, Selle Flite Ti Seat, Time ATAC Carbon Pedals. Going to replace bottom bracket and crank this winter!
Bottom Line:
This is a fantastic bike... I love riding it... I do a ton of road riding, however I have been on the Trek a little more this summer. Much like everyone else, the Bontrager stock parts suck. I have only the crank to replace before I will be completely content. I would recommend buying the frameset and building it from there, but the reality is, that could get quite expensive. Of the entire fuel series, I think it is the best bike for the value. I would like to upgrade to the Mavic CrossMax wheelset, however don't need to drop $800 right now. The bike weight is around 23-24 lbs, it always seems heavier after I have riden the road bike for a while. For the money, you cannot go wrong!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Shawn
a
from Auburn, CA Date Reviewed: September 7, 2001
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$1800.00
Purchased At:
Sharp Bicycles, Rocklin CA
Strengths:
Smooth ride, responsive, light for the price. Strong components mix.
Weaknesses:
Tubless rims without tubless tires. They won't tell you. The Rolf freewheel came loose two times and then failed. Shops I spoke said they've replaced numerous Rolf rear hubs. The tires don't match the bike. Half tread for racing though it's not a racing bike. Make it lighter, but they lasted only a few rides in the Sierra terrain.
Similar Products Used:
Specialized Stumpjumper Comp.
Bottom Line:
Trek (Sharp Bicycles) seems to be on top of the rear hub problem. They paid full value when I replaced it in Tahoe. The tires don't last on knarly rocky trails.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Alex
a Cross Country Rider
from Boulder, CO Date Reviewed: August 10, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Tsali, NC, Porcupine Rim, Moab, Monarch Crest, CO
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Purchased At:
bike shop I work at
Strengths:
It sucks up the bumps well without pedaling like a wet noodle. Pretty light. Good geometry.
Weaknesses:
All stock parts SUCK. Chainlines are bad. Kinda flexy rear end for my 200lbs. Not the plushest bike I've ever ridden, but you can't have everything! Pivot bolts loosen up as the bushings start to wear. Some of them have been breaking at the seat tube/toptube junction. Say's "Trek" on it ;)
Similar Products Used:
Specialized FSR & Enduro, Intense Tracer & Uzzi, Moots YBB, ridden just about everything else
Wow, Trek has come from nowhere and made a competitve bike! The ride is a bit on the racy side. If you like to sweat and keep up with people, this is a fun bike. The geometry is good, esp. in the fast stuff. Not the best woods bike, but not the worst either. The seatpost angle is a little slack for me, but I have long legs. I've ridden this bike all over CO and UT this year, and it's one of the best jack of all trades bikes out there. It's light (mines 23.5lbs), it's got 3" of usable travel, dosn't bob (no need for lockout), and it looks normal. All the stock parts suck. Drivetrain gave me problems till I replaced everything fairly quickly, dropped some weight and gained some peace of mind. The SID is too flexy for me ( I normaly have a Z2 on my Kona hartail) but they addresesed that with the Duke on the 02' 98. Overall, a real nice bike that still needs some attention in the parts dept. Not that expensive off the floor, but you do end up spending lots to replace the stock parts down the road.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
jvmoradi
a Cross Country Rider
from Atlanta, GA Date Reviewed: August 7, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Conyers, GA ('96 Olympic Trail)
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$2000.00
Purchased At:
Atlanta Cycling
Strengths:
Ascends almost as well as a hardtail, flies down hill, soaks up rough terrain, corners well. Rolf wheels take a beating and stay true. Good component mix of XT/XTR. Ride longer, stay fresher. LOVE the stock seat.
Weaknesses:
Bottom bracket is very low and sometimes hits obstacles I used to clear w/ my last bike. Bontrager crank and pedals suck.
This is one INCREDIBLE bike. I was a hardtail devotee and thought there was no way I'd ever ride a softtail (unless I moved to Utah). I demo'ed a Sugar, and really disliked the geometry -- my weight was way too far back and the bike felt dramatically different than a hardtail. I'd already ordered a Stumpy from my LBS to replace my sweetheart bike, when I saw the Fuel sitting there. I couldn't resist and took it for a spin. WHAT A BIKE! Rides just like a Trek Hardtail, you don't use the rear travel unless you need it. The Fuel 100 was 600 bucks more, but the minor differences (SID SL, less crappy Bonty crank, FOX RC rear) isn't worth it unless you have cash to burn. The shock on the 98 doesn't lock out, but you always have the option of dialing it stiffer (once you try a Fuel, you'll never want to lock it out anyway). Bottom line, if you're an XC rider or racer who's very conscious of your times, this bike is gonna make you a hell of a lot faster. Mine is about 25 lbs, but I race faster than I do on a 22 lb. hardtail. It climbs nearly as well as a hardtail, but descends so much faster that you really pick up time. It also smooths out rough trail incredibly well. Hardtail devotees will have to learn to scope lines all over again, and you'll be so much faster once you do. Basically, the bike has allowed me to become a better rider. And it's so much fun that I can't wait to hop on it at the end of the day. To all you FS virgins, I say take the plunge -- it's more fun than everyone says it is.
This bike ain't for everyone. 3" rear travel isn't much (I only use about 1 1/2 - 2 max), it's only there to take the edge off rough trail and save your strength. The 98 isn't a freeride bike, the suspension isn't gonna allow you to drop off 6 foot drops. However, the 98 is a high performance XC bike that can take the place of your XC racing hardtail and make you a faster rider. ALso know that you can't put disc brakes on the 98 or 100 because of the carbon seat stays. If speed is your thing, this is the best FS XC bike on the market.
The crappy bonty parts (esp. pedals and crank) will be replaced as soon as I have the dough, but that's not enough to deny 5 chilis. What else can you ask for for this price? Way to go Trek, you really nailed it this time.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Mudboy
a Cross Country Rider
from Seattle Date Reviewed: July 23, 2001
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$1600.00
Purchased At:
MTBR classifieds
Strengths:
Sweetest ride for an FS bike -- great frameset, just the right travel for XC, good climber.
Weaknesses:
Sub par components; need to customize the set-up to get it right
Similar Products Used:
Sugar 1, Specialized Enduro -- all crap compared to this.
Bike Setup:
Mavic 517s-XTR hubs; King headset; XT hollowtech cranks; XT brakes; Time ATACs; better tires, grips....
Bottom Line:
Killer bike for serious XC riders. Great climber. No need to buy the Fuel 100 -- basically the same bike, except you get slightly better Bontrager parts, which suck anyway.
The parts spec puzzles me -- how can Trek create a killer frame but ruin every little parts company they buy? The biggest disappointment is Bontrager. I still have an old Trek 8000 with some excellent Bontrager parts -- three years later and the quality goes down the toilet. The Bontrager Race cranks on the Fuel immediately started throwing the chain on downhills, so I switched to XTs -- problem solved. The handlebars were way too wide -- cut an inch off each side. Pedals? The RE-1s blow. The only Bontrager part I haven't had trouble with (and like) is the seat.
The crap headset was grinding like sandpaper after ONE MODERATELY WET RIDE, so I swapped for the King.
The Rolf wheels were so pretty, I was psyched to ride them -- until several friends (and fellow MTBR reviewers) warned me of the hub problems and other design flaws. I sold 'em off the bike and bought 517s -- flawless performance.
If you can get a good deal on this bike, buy it -- otherwise, buy the frameset and build your dream bike -- you won't be disappointed.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Tim
a Cross Country Rider
from Sarnia,Ontario Date Reviewed: July 22, 2001
Favorite Trail:
pontiac lake
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Strengths:
Climbing,Handling,cross-country riding at speed
Weaknesses:
Cranks(flexy)
Similar Products Used:
Cannondale jekyll,Giant nrs1,fisher sugar 1
Bike Setup:
Stock
Bottom Line:
Great bike for intended purpose,rode the same loop as my cannondale hardtail and was faster and alot more fresh at the end.I took alot less abuse.Climbs great,decends great and covers rough and rocky trails quickly.Shifting was good.I set up the shock pressure @ my body weight and 75 psi in the front forks.I have owned the nrs 1(last years model) and the jekyll and I feel this bike is better than both.If I run into any problems I will post another review.But as of now a great xc bike.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Tom
a Cross Country Rider
from Woodland, Utah USA Date Reviewed: July 14, 2001
Favorite Trail:
What ever trail I'm on. Bench Creek is great.
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$2000.00
Purchased At:
Guthrie Bikes, SLC
Strengths:
Light for full suspension, stiff, and really smooth. I was on a Trek Y-33, and this feels more like a hardtail in terms of handling, but is even smoother on the rough stuff. It turns very quickly and is incredibly responsive. It's made me a better rider because the handling is so precise.
Weaknesses:
The stock tires are good on hard pack or slickrock, but pretty lame on loose or dusty trails. I replaced them with somthing with more tread. But that is really a factor of trail conditions. The Bontrager cranks creak under heavy load. I don't like the Bontrager pedals as much as my old Shimano 747's.
Similar Products Used:
Trek Y-22, Tested the Trek STP-400, and looked pretty seriously at a Moots and Seven with the tortion-bar chain stay suspension.
Bike Setup:
Stock except for the tires. I'm thinking about changing pedals.
Bottom Line:
I've ridden this all over now, from slick rock in Moab and Gooseberry Mesa to dry dusty trails on the North Rim of the Grand Canyon, and some loose, dusty trails in the Park City area. This bike is good in all conditions. It turns extremely fast, very responsive. I'm cleaning trails I used to get off and walk. The wide handle bar had taken some getting used to--it's a little wider than some of the local aspen trees are spaced. But I like the control with it.
Best mountain bike I've ever owned. I didn't see anything about the Fuel 100 that justified the extra price.
Buy this bike if you're a serious rider and like fast, tight single tracks. I love to climb, and have never missed being able to lock the rear shock out (the lock out shock is the biggest difference between the 98 and the 100). There's no bobbing at all unless you're griding away on pavement. It's fast uphill, and really flies down hill, and is nimble enough to jump over the stuff in between.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Vernon
a Cross Country Rider
from Tulsa, Ok Date Reviewed: July 11, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Turkey Mountaion and Robbers Cave State Park
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Purchased At:
T-Town Bicycles
Strengths:
Light and stiff! Great control and feel. Super ride! Even with only 3" of travel in the rear it has a better feel than my old Y-22 with 4" and I feel much better than the Specializeds with 3".
Weaknesses:
Bontrager cranks creak.
Don't like factory tires. Weight goes way up when you replace them.
Similar Products Used:
Trek Y-22. Test rides on Trek VRX and Specialized XTR.
Bike Setup:
Gortex cables. Avid mechanical disc brakes with Dolomite disc rims. Cut handlebars down from 25 to 23 inches. Lightweight bar ends.
Bottom Line:
The reason I went with the 98 instead of the 90 is that by the time I got through changing all the components on the 90 that I didn't like the cost difference was minimal to go with a 98 and add disc brakes.
Great bike for cross country. I don't think it's as good downhill as my old Y-22 but the SID fork compresses quicker than my old Mantion SX-R did so that may be the difference.
Added disc brakes because V-brakes just didn't slow me down fast enough. I'm much more in control and enjoying steep technical downhills because I can control the bike so much better. Only thing I'm tempted to do is put on a 100mm front fork because I think this bike has the geometry and rear end to fully utilize the longer travel.
What I like best about this bike as opposed to the Specializeds is that when you crank on the pedals the front wheel lifts. When I test rode the Specializeds they always felt very light, very agile, and very soft in the rear end. Fuel rear end feels very stiff when you're cranking but very plush on the bumps. I tend to hang off the rear end a lot so I run more pressure in the rear shock which occasionaly gives me some wheel hop.
I'm a heavy rider so this bike takes a lot of punishment. So far my only problem is the Bontrager cranks creak (every bike I've ever ridden has) and the Gortex cable jackets were to flexy.
I wish I could give this bike a 4 1/2 so I settled for 4. Fuel 90 is a better price with very close performance.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
alex
a Racer
from harrison usa Date Reviewed: July 10, 2001
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$1490.00
Purchased At:
Sherwood Cycle and Fitness
Strengths:
Rigid. XTR and XT stuff, huge improvement/correction this year as opposed to last years crap Trek was putting on their high end bikes. Climbs super fast, corners great, Rolf Wheels are super duper, cockpit feels great like they built if for me esp. Like the fox rear shock its so tuneable!
Weaknesses:
Hmm, well im a nitpicker so here it goes: handlebars way too wide. Bontrager components, Trek should really sit down and talk about switching to ALL shimano stuff. Keith's components suck. His chainrings and crank are less than to be desired of. Im not sure about the bushing life, im getting some fraying around the edges of the plastic bushings. Could be perfectly normal and they may outlast the bike, dunno.
Similar Products Used:
Giant, Trek 9700, 9.9 Pro
Bike Setup:
All factory excluding the front shock, i replaced it w/ a SID Race.
Bottom Line:
It's like discovering mtbing all over again. This is the best bike ive ever rode bar none! My 9.9 is about 21-22lbs and this fuel is 25.2 cant really feel the difference except on hard sprints or after a long hard ride up hills. Ive compared my lap times w/ my HT and they are equal sometimes the fuel comes ahead by a few minutes and vice versa. Ive always been a HT nut but this bike has swayed me as it's performance is influencing potential trek fuel crossovers. I've raced the fuel and was very pleased w/ the results, two flats and i still missed third place by less thn a minute. For courses w/ long sprints and long relatively smooth climbs i'll probaly still race my HT but overall this is a super bike. I only regret not being able to buy another one. Way to go trek! Would have gave five chillis if not for the Bontrager crap.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Lou
a Cross Country Rider
from Jackson, MS Date Reviewed: July 6, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Forrest Hill
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$1400.00
Purchased At:
The Bike Rack (LBS)
Strengths:
Weight, Speed, and no bob whatsoever. Oh yeah, its the best looking thing on the market.
Weaknesses:
None yet.
Similar Products Used:
Own a Fisher Sugar 4, but my old ride was a Specialized Steel Hardtail
Bike Setup:
The bike was bought as a frameset so... Marzocchi Z2 Atom Race, Chris King Headset, Thomson stem, Easton EA70 Handlebar, Magura Louise Brakes, Full XT, Magura Open Pro Disc Hubs W/ Mavic X317 Rims, Thomson Seatpost, Selle Italia Flight Gel Ti, Time ATAC Alium pedals, Panaracer Fire XC
Bottom Line:
Supposedly I got one of the last three in the country from Trek. My LBS stripped it for me and sold it for 100 less than the fuel frameset (essentially the same with a Float R instead of an RC) since there were no 100's left. I just finished building it up and im racing on Sunday. So we'll see how it does. Feels as fast as my hardtail and lighter than a the lower end fisher sug4. It looks great too. However, I would have to say custom is the only way to go. How can you get that bontrager crap after youve seen my bike.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Randy
a Cross Country Rider
from Louisville, KY USA Date Reviewed: July 1, 2001
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$1650.00
Purchased At:
Jeffersonville Schwinn
Strengths:
With out a doubt, everything is superior to my past ride(22 lb OCLV). I was the typical hardtail holdout until I decided "what the hell" and bought this bike.
Weaknesses:
Its weight is quite noticeable over my carbon bike and isnt as fast on the straights or climbs, but the "big hit" aches and pains are over now and I can concentrate on my technique. Being accustomed to a hardtail all my life, i'd be nitpicking to find a weakness this soon.
Similar Products Used:
This is the first full suspension ive owned. Have a Trek OCLV 9800 hardtail tweaked for racing (collecting dust now)
Bike Setup:
Stock with exception of Maxxis Wormdrive tires, ODI grips, and Flite Gel Ti saddle.
Bottom Line:
I was certain the weight difference was going to punish me, but I bought the bike anyway. I found out quickly that weight to me is only noticeable after my body has taken such a pounding from a hardtail that im too tired and sore for a big climb, so I would naturally blame the bikes weight. The weight of this bike is respectable,its climbing prowess is almost equal to my carbon bike, the suspension absorbs all the stuff that once hurt me or slowed me looking for a better line. I go over now instead of around and my body isnt hammered like it was on the OCLV. Though this is my first FS bike, my bottom line is im convinced now suspension is the way to go. My laps are multiple minutes faster now than on my hardtail. My buddy(LiteSpeed rider) isnt convinced yet, but im passing him every time out so it shouldnt be long. Hardtail holdouts the time to convert to less pain and quicker times is now. Good Job Trek A+.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Wogglebear
a Cross Country Rider
from La Date Reviewed: June 30, 2001
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$1100.00
Purchased At:
EP from Trek
Strengths:
Climbs like a mountain goat on meth! The suspension really helps to keep you fresh longer in a race. It handels very well. Feels like it was custom made for me! new SidXC feels great(in the past I always replaced them because of rlex)
Weaknesses:
None so far. I miss my disc brakes on the down hills:(
Full XTR grupo, Python tubeless. Everything else is stock.
Bottom Line:
Trek did its home work on this one. It is the best bike I have owned! If you are looking for a great XC/Race bike then you need to look at this one! If the FSR line feels too cramped up to you then the Fuel should fit like a glove. It is defantly worth a look!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
The UnReal DonS
a Racer
from Conway, AR Date Reviewed: June 29, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Old Post Park
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$2000.00
Purchased At:
Conway Bicycle Shop
Strengths:
Best value in the Fuel line if you're looking for a true XC racer. Same frame as top of the line Fuel 100, smart XT/XTR parts mix, SID XC front shock, Rolf Dolomite tubeless wheels, all for $$$ less than the Fuel 100. Trek has done their homework and gets an A.
Weaknesses:
None so far, but understand that this bike is designed to be a XC race/trail bike, not a freeride/DH ride. If you use it as intended it'll be all the bike you'll ever want.
Similar Products Used:
Demo'd Fisher Sugar 2, Trek STP 300
Bike Setup:
Stock except for Time ATAC pedals, Hutchinson Python Tubeless tires, and Sigma 800 computer
Bottom Line:
I have had this bike since February, and could not be more pleased with it. It instantly made me a better rider. I've ridden it in 6 races so far this year, and had zero problems. Two of the early races were a muddy mess, with many DNF's due to mechanicals, but the Fuel 98 worked flawlessly. Obviously the rear suspension makes a difference on decents, but what has impressed me the most is how well the Fuel 98 climbs. Traction is greatly improved by the rear soaking up all the little bumps and keeping the rear tire hooked up. And when you need to stand up and hammer to get around someone on a climb, power loss isn't noticable. For XC racing, this bike behaves like a hardtail but gives you all the advantages of full suspension. Having said all that, this is not the bike for everyone. If you are looking for something for general trail rides that will be very plush, the Fuel is probably going to be a bit on the harsh side. And the short travel suspension is not what you want for big drops. But if XC racing and fast trail riding is what you do, the Fuel 98 would be an excellent choice.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
GT
a Racer
from Chicago, IL Date Reviewed: June 26, 2001
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$1000.00
Purchased At:
Trek
Strengths:
I know someone who rides for TREK so i was able to get a Fuel 98 for a cool $1000 - great price! After alot of research i wanted this bike bad to help with my racing (i'm semi-pro, hoping to go full soon). Had it for about 3 months now and absolutely love it. I've raced it three times only yet it has already improved my performance ( 2 wins and a close second). Climbs great with no bob-loss, even when hammered. I have the rear set up hard (about 200/210 psi)and this thing flies. Its one very fast bike!! Very smooth and stable, yet still nimble enough to handle the tight stuff. Some people have said that it is weak going down? This is due more to riding technique than anything else. This thing flies downhill for a XC racer. This bike has great feel overall. Well built, strong and fast.
Weaknesses:
Not much really - i'd just be nit-picking.
Similar Products Used:
S-works FSR (great bike, lighter than the Fuel but not as good overall), Sugar 1 (great bike but just needs slightly more rear travel for me), Klien Adept pro (see Sugar 1), Rocket stage 1 (not a big Schwinn fan but decent ride), Can. Jekyll (plush trail rider. Nb - test rode the new Scalpel and yes it sucks!) And rode the Fuel 100 - but because i could get the 98 for a grand i went with that because i like the look alot better than the 100.
Bike Setup:
Full XTR. King headset. Easton Race bars w/Profile Carbon ends. Thompson Elite seatpost and stem. Running the Dolomite Tubeless that came with. The rest mostly stock as yet. Weighs in at around the 23lbs mark.
doesnt bob unless you make it... descends like a mtn goat when the shox are set up right. i am light abotu 140 lbs so i have 130 in the rear and 60 in front.... climbs EXTREMELY WELL i put on some michelin wildgipper hot S tires, cuz i hate those revolts, i ride a lot in rocky sloppy crap so those michelins rule
Weaknesses:
none that i can find, i wish they did make a disk brake fuel 98.. i wanted a 90 disk but trek is out of em... so i bought the 98 and converted it.... it would have cost more but i work at a bike shop so i got discounts
Bike Setup:
stock except for bontrager race disk wheels, and hayes hydors
Bottom Line:
KICK ASS BIKE.....WORTYH THE DOUGH
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Stic Harris
a Cross Country Rider
from Decatur, GA Date Reviewed: June 25, 2001
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$2000.00
Purchased At:
Freeflite Bicycles
Strengths:
Climbs and climbs with no bobbing whatsoever. Very nimble. Point the nose and it goes. No surprises. Great saddle and nice touch with the tubeless rims. I wish they'd had the tubeless tires with them...
Weaknesses:
The width of the handlebars make you feel like you're on a Harley. No tubeless tires.
Similar Products Used:
Specialized FSR XC Comp & Pro, Giant NRS 1, Gary Fisher Sugar 1, Klein Adept, Cannondale Jekyll
Bike Setup:
Trimmed 3/4 inch off each end of the handlebars and added shorty bar ends.
Bottom Line:
I was all set to buy another FSR XC. Unfortunately the specialized store I went to had put the bike together incorrectly. I test rode the Specialized in Austin, TX instead. I took my time and tested wuite a few other bikes. In the end there was no comparison. I fell in love with the Trek the first time I rode it in a parking lot and went off a drop-off. It was reinforced a week later when I raced it in my first XC race. And two weeks after that. It's so easy to stay seated while your plowing up hills. Then again I've never been on a bike that was so easily trackable through tight single track. I have really pounded this bike and the carbon stays are none the worse for wear. I'm ecstatic with my choice...
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
john c
a Racer
from north van BC canada Date Reviewed: June 25, 2001
Favorite Trail:
thrill me kill me
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$2000.00
Purchased At:
dizzy cycles, thanks for the service guys
Strengths:
incredibly smooth and balanced, point and shoot, climbs exceptionally well and doesn't bob in the saddle. very light for amount of travel, best stock saddle I've ever used, double bottle cages on extra large model (great idea), nice wheel set
Weaknesses:
none so far but am wary of carbon stays (but extra care that is needed is worth the price for incredible lateral stiffness)
Similar Products Used:
rocky mtn vertex, norco team issue, santa cruz superlight, gt i drive giant xtc ds 1
Bike Setup:
stock
Bottom Line:
Raced this on its second day in the epic test of metal; felt super comfortable even with so little time on it. Was able to ride technical parts of plunge faster and more aggressively than ever before. Doesn't bob unless you really push hard out of the saddle. reasonable weight for amount of travel. this is one very balanced ride. Trek nailed it the first time; front end feels better for north shore riding than the giant or gt racing machines. I will use this for most of my shore riding when not doing big stuff. this bike goes where ever you point it regardless of rocks roots, holes or boulders and does it at mach 7. I haven't had this much fun in a long time off road. If you want a cross country racer that you can take on long adventure type riding, this one is it. If you're hard on equipment, maybe get the 90 and upgrade the front fork as the carbon stays might not be super durable.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Richard Ryckoff
a Cross Country Rider
from Lahaina, Hawaii, USA Date Reviewed: June 24, 2001
Favorite Trail:
EMI (East Maui Irrigation) out toward Hana
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Purchased At:
South Maui Bicycles
Strengths:
Amazing x-country full suspension design; feels as solid as a hardtail without the harshness; very responsive handling with excellent geometry; light and climbs and descends fantastic; also has the advantages of conventional diamond main frame and looks very cool.
Weaknesses:
None really so far, except a little chain suck once or twice.
Similar Products Used:
My first full suspension; previous hardtails = Marin, Kona and Schwinn Moab 1.
Bike Setup:
Upgrades: Rolf Propel wheels, Specialized Mt. Baldy semi-slicks(375grams!), med. cage XTR rear drl, Flite ti saddle, Ritchey stem, Easton carbon bars and Bontrager magnesium (shorty) bar ends.
Bottom Line:
I waited several years before taking the full suspension plunge -- and I'm glad I did. This bike handles like a dream and I swear feels as solid as a hardtail. I haven't detected any lateral flex in the rear end (or noise) at all. I almost bought a Sugar 1 a year ago. This bike has slightly more travel and a way beefier down tube (especially at the bottom bracket) which should pay off in a stiffer bike overall. The rear suspension design seems to me (after very extensive comparing of different makes) to be the best so far. I also came close to ordering a Santa Cruz Superlight (a very good bike). But I think the Fuel is more active and more neutral (no bobbing). It climbs and descends great -- and the handling seems even better than my Kona Kula -- which was a very good hardtail. I would recommend the Fuel to all X-country riders, So far, I couldn't be happier.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Matt Kelm
a
from Indianapolis, IN Date Reviewed: June 22, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Kickapoo State Park, IL
Duration Product Used:
Tested or demo'ed only
Strengths:
Obviously the rear suspension. The three inches in the rear keep the rear wheel on the ground pretty consistently, which is very helpful on climbs. It also allows you to concentrate less on picking the smoothest line--important on a hardtail. Every time you move the handlebars during a climb you are wasting (using) a lot of extra energy. The Fuel allows you to take a straight path on most climbs while compensating for any lack of skill by maintaining traction. Naturally, it helps on descents too.
Weaknesses:
The rear, although relatively stiff laterally, still feels a little more sketchy than a hardtail. But that is to be expected, and the tradeoff is more than acceptable for most riders. More important is the weight. Although the weight of the Fuel 98 is respectable compared to other full suspension bikes in this price range, I would be hesitant to say it's a a great racer out of the box. Hell, the Fuel 100 still weighs about 24.9 pounds. With a couple part upgrades though, it's an excellent cross-country bike for racing or riding.
I have heard a few gripes because the Fuel comes with bushings instead of cartridge bearings. Oh heavens, no! Bushings were used because they're a little lighter, and the natural stiction offers a kind of buffer against pedal-induced bobbing. It's true--if you ride a lot or race, you will probably have to have the bushings serviced/replaced once a year or so. Who cares. Do it at the end of the season, and it will cost you $20-$50. Cartridge bearings are not invincible either.
Similar Products Used:
I currently ride a Trek STP 400.
Bike Setup:
The Fuel was stock, except the pedals--I used Times.
Bottom Line:
I work at a bike shop, and the Trek rep generously allowed me to take this bike for a week. On the last day I had the bike--a Sunday--I raced it. Although a little on the heavy side, it performed very well. There were three long climbs in each lap, and I gained a lot of time on those climbs. Climbing is not normally my specialty, either. I took second place in my category, and 7th overall out of about 45. I owe part of that to the Fuel.
As a side note--if you can't find a Fuel this year, or can't afford one yet, wait till next year! There will be more carbon in the rear triangle. Trek is trying to bring the weight down a little, and the 2002 Fuel 100 should weigh around 23.5 pounds. And it'll come with a 2002 SID fork, with titanium-nitride-coated uppers...yum.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Donovan
a Cross Country Rider
from Greenville, SC Date Reviewed: June 22, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Paris Mtn
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$1999.00
Purchased At:
The Great Escape
Strengths:
Light weight (27.5lbs) Great climber & descender Looks sharp
Weaknesses:
OCLV seat stays Trek's warranty Slow in corners
Similar Products Used:
first full suspension. old bike is a Cannondale M500 with a bunch of goodies and an Atom Bomb.
Bike Setup:
Factory, with cushier grips and bar ends
Bottom Line:
I fell in love during the test ride. I was able to stand up and climb with my center of gravity where it should be, and the same for descents. I'm 6'2" / 205lbs and went with the large frame.
I had rode it about ten times at a local mtn bike park (Timmons) when I noticed that the OCLV seat stay on the drivetrain side was cracked all the way around the tube. This was within three weeks of plunking down more $ on a bike then I'd ever thought I would.
My LBS returned it to Trek to be evaluated. Trek told me it was caused by an impact force (i.e. a crash or the bike falling over) and it wasn't covered by their warranty, which really only covers manufacturers defects. They normally charge you $240 per stay when you break a carbon fiber, and $180 when you break an aluminum ( 80s & 90s)but they agreed to replace both OCLV stays with aluminum stays for $100.
My LBS thought I got off lucky but I'm still convinced that I did no wrong and I think Trek should stand behind their products. In the long run, getting an extra $100 from me will mean never having my business again. If they keep buying up competitors like they have been I'll probably have to go with a huffy for the next bike. At least there's no carbon fiber to break.
Now that I've got the bike back, essentially a 90 with 98 parts now, I'm enjoying the ride. I've taken it up to the "real" trails and am happy with it. it climbs and descends well. the suspension never gets in your way. Two days ago I was standing and pedaling up a paved rode to get back to the trails and I didn't notice any bobbing. But once you hit the rough stuff the suspension kicks in. It's pretty ideal for cross country riding.
The geometry is very laid back, you never get the feeling you're heading over the handlebars on a downhill, but it doesn't cut as sharply as my c'dale on the tight singletrack and I've shouldered a couple trees when I didn't make the turn as sharply as I thought I could.
The SID does OK, it's not a Marzocchi, but it hasn't bottomed out with 70psi as of yet. the bonty parts will eventually all be replaced I'm sure with raceface, and the dolemites with 517's. but i'm planning on riding a lot, so these might last a long time if you're buying this bike to hang in the garage. I guess that's what Treks counting on with their lousy warranty.
Anyway I'll repost after I've put some more miles on it.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Matt
a Racer
from Hood River, OR, USA Date Reviewed: June 19, 2001
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$2000.00
Purchased At:
Mt. View Cycles, Hood River
Strengths:
Fast Handling, Light, looks like a "normal" bike. Little or no pedal-induced bobbing. climbs well, descends well, real fast across the rough flats.
Weaknesses:
None so far
Similar Products Used:
FSR, Sugar
Bottom Line:
This bike rules! If you are a cross-country rider who likes to go fast, and wants full suspension this is the bike for you. It's not a bouncy mattress, this is a responsive, tunable, light and agile fun steed. it's a good value - much of the performance of the Fuel100 - a bit heavier and no lockouts (which I don't miss) - but way cheaper.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Neil Checketts
a
from San Diego Date Reviewed: June 19, 2001
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Purchased At:
UC Cyclery
Strengths:
Cross country manuverability, Fast bike, great control, suspension works sooooo great that you can't tell it's even there.
Weaknesses:
Nothing Yet.
Similar Products Used:
Gt, Ibis Szazbo,
Bike Setup:
Stock Fuel 98
Bottom Line:
This is a great FS XC mountain bike. quick and responsive. Great bike if you want to feel the terrain but not "FEEL THE TERRAIN" goes uphill great and halls ass down. Overall a great bike and would reccomend this to anyone.. Buy this bike if you love a fast cross country full suspension bike. "THANK YOU TREK" P.S. as far as the problem of not being able to have discs. don't need them, and don't want them
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
jeff
a Cross Country Rider
from detroit, michigan, usa Date Reviewed: June 18, 2001
Favorite Trail:
pontiac lake
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$2300.00
Purchased At:
BIKE USA.... nothin but the best
Strengths:
EVERYTHING.... CLIMBS GREAT, DESCENDS GREAT, TURNS LIKE A DREAM
Weaknesses:
none that i can think of... dont wana chip the lovley paint
Similar Products Used:
in fs.. 96 crack n'fail super v 2000
Bike Setup:
xt shifters, xt front deralier, xtr rear, sid fork, float r rear shock... hayes brakes, bontrager race disk wheels
Bottom Line:
KICK ASS PRODUCT FROM TREK... GODBLESS THOSE BOYS, BUY THE DESIGNERS A BEER FOR A GREAT PRODUCT
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
What's New
»
BEST OF MTBR - Check out the highest rated bikes, parts, & gear!
»
LED BIKE LIGHT SHOOTOUT 3 - We test all the newest products and latest light and battery technology in this comprehensive guide»
$
Overall Rating:
Overall Rating:
