Submitted by
James Northwood
a Cross Country Rider
from Oakville, Ontario, Canada Date Reviewed: October 27, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Any and all
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Price Paid:
$600.00
Purchased At:
Oakville Cycle and Sports
Strengths:
Excellent package for cost. Very durable and fast. A great everywhere anything bike! I ride absolutely everything - trails - hills - road - race - down/up hill.
Weaknesses:
Fork flex when braking excessively(often avoiding cars) Front derailer sucks chain up from third to second shifts. Serious racers should look for a more serious bike right from the start but anyone wanting a race capable bike they can ride whereever whenever THIS IS IT !
Similar Products Used:
Norco Rampage was another consideration but had less for more money...
Bike Setup:
Front-STX-RC Rear-LX stock with new front pads and rear tire after over 1000km !!! last summer. It takes a mojor beating. I had riser bars from new but otherwise stock.
Bottom Line:
This is the best bike you can get in this price range. It is VERY durable and has never left me stranded on a trail or road EVER! It has lasted many km of hard aggressive riding which it probably wasn't intended for. It has great shifting, braking, and handling along with last for ever solidness. It has survived too many crashes avoiding dam card and has convinced me that specialized makes amazing bikes. I've had no problems what so ever. A great bike! GREAT BUY
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Adam
a Weekend Warrior
from Easton, CT Date Reviewed: September 3, 2001
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Strengths:
Great Frame, best part about the bike rapid fire shifting durable
Weaknesses:
Brakes, dia compe something, had to upgrade to 2001 deore lx v-brakes and they are real nice Fork, too bouncy Tires, slip in trails
Similar Products Used:
none
Bike Setup:
LX rear; STX-RC front, Jett T-2 fork
Bottom Line:
Overall a good bike. With a few upgrades this bike could be a great hardtail. Rides nicely. Fork and brakes aren't good. If I had to give it a grade it would be a B.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Samuel Isaak
a Weekend Warrior
from B.C. Date Reviewed: May 30, 2001
Favorite Trail:
brads trail
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$350.00
Purchased At:
bought used
Strengths:
the frame is awsome and the fork (00 z5)is reely beffy the cranks and other parts are strong as well.
Weaknesses:
the rear rim bent 2mm on me and the front derailer was reely hard to shift other wise the bike is awsome !
Similar Products Used:
none
Bike Setup:
the bike came with a z5 and half desent parts like stx-rc the rear weel would be great for cross countrying but not for freeriding the bash gaurd rocks and the breaks are desent but could be upgraded.
Bottom Line:
this bike is awsome if your thinking of buying it then go for it .
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Ian Brekke
a Weekend Warrior
from Mound, MN, U.S.A. Date Reviewed: May 8, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Minnesota River Trail
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$420.00
Purchased At:
Sports Hut
Strengths:
-Very Durable -Great bang for the buck -Well built frame -Good setup for all types of riding -Nice crank. Like the originality
Weaknesses:
-No name brakes take away some bragging rights -Good hubs, but could do better on the rims -bad pedals, seat as hard as a rock (ha ha, get it?) -Have had problems with the STX-RC front derailler. Can't downshift too fast while pedaling or chain will go. I suggest to upgrade if you get the chance. -crappy fork
Similar Products Used:
Raleigh M-80
Bike Setup:
LX front derailler, new seat, time alium pedals, bar ends, rear mud fender, Mt Baldy Specalized tires
Bottom Line:
A nice bike for anyone, really. I'm 15 years old, about 5' 3" and I ride a 13". Works nice if you put a few upgrades on. Beautiful on the road, and can take off road but if you want true performance I suggest a better shock. That is the real short-coming of this bike. But Overall, this bike has a sweet feel and is totally worth the money.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jeff
a Weekend Warrior
from Longmont, CO Date Reviewed: April 25, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Moab
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Price Paid:
$650.00
Strengths:
Bang for the buck. Good frame to build upon. Nice geometry for intermediates. Relatively cheap (pricewise)
Good basic MTB frame, angles are not too extreme for beginners. Driveline is hard to keep aligned for optimum shifting especially the front shifter. Bargain basement front shock is limited in adjustment. No braze-ons for disc brake conversions without major rework. Soaks up the rouch stuff and keeps on trucking. Climbing ability - average, the relaxed head angle makes tight switchbacks a bit of work. Overall a good starter bike, can be made into a pretty decent bike with better components. On the Flamin' Chili scale - mild salsa, hold the jalapenos.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Greg
a Weekend Warrior
from Dundas, Ontario, Canada Date Reviewed: April 21, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Dundas Valley
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$500.00
Purchased At:
Pierik's Cycle
Strengths:
takes a beating fairly well, great components for the money shelled out
Weaknesses:
Front rim (pulses when braking), can't get front der. to shift that smoothly, seat feels like wood. pedal cages
Bike Setup:
body geometry seat, shimano clipless pedals were added
Bottom Line:
A great bike for the money you pay. While it's not the lightest bike, it's great for someone who rides recreationally. The seat has to be replaced, as the stock one hurts on even short rides, and the front der. should be upgraded (even my bike shop can't adjust it properly). The front rim issue is pretty minor. I've ridden the bike pretty hard, and haven't managed to wreck it. A good entry level bike for someone interested in trying offroad but not sure if they want to put down a lot of money on a bike.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
mark
a Weekend Warrior
from saratoga, N.Y. Date Reviewed: July 29, 2000
Favorite Trail:
skidmore
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
the general feel of the bike. it feels and rides great! i do 50/50 bike trail and offroad.
Weaknesses:
had a problem with the front wheel. the rim developed a bulge in it around the seem. the dealer sanded this area down but the brakes still pulsate. a new rim is on order.
Similar Products Used:
m80, gt,
Bike Setup:
stock
Bottom Line:
the bike rides and feels great. however, i'm not happy with the braking system or the rims.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Ryan
a Cross Country Rider
from Macon,GA Date Reviewed: July 7, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Camp Thunder
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
frame,wheels,and the fork is awesome for the money.
Weaknesses:
Seat felt like sitting on the top tube afer an hour,brakes, and crankset,bent the middle chain ring after 3 rides.
Similar Products Used:
GT Timberline FS
Bike Setup:
Mars 1 fork,kore clipless,Body Geometry Seat,bontrager stem and titec bar, and plan to upgrade crank and brakes
Bottom Line:
Really sweet bike and worth alot more then what you pay.After a few upgrades you've got a awesome bike.Anybody looking for a real dirtworthy bike and a medium budget get the Rockhopper FS,you'll never regret it.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Rob Smith
a Weekend Warrior
from Chicago, IL, USA Date Reviewed: June 28, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Des Plaines River Trail
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Strengths:
Excellent Frame
Weaknesses:
Poor Seat
Similar Products Used:
Raliegh M60
Bike Setup:
'97 Rigid Frame w/Stock Crank and Seat Post, Rock Shox Judy XC Fork, XT Derailluers front and rear, XT Rapidfires, LX Brake Calipers and Levers, XT Cassette, Sun CR18 Rims w/STX-RC Hubs, Michelin Wildgripper Tires, Terry Liberator Saddle, Salsa Moto Ace Stem, Easton CT2 Carbon Fiber Bar, Cycle Pro Pillow Grips.
Bottom Line:
At the time I bought it, it was the best I could afford, yet I've enjoyed the frame so much, that rather than purchase a new bike, I performed the upgrades shown above. This bike has done it all, from Singletrack to Centurys, and it just keeps coming back for more. The frame combines strength, comfort, and value. For the price, the original component mix was a good deal. I would not hesitate a moment in recommending a Specialized Product. What else can I say?
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jeff
a Weekend Warrior
from Maryland Date Reviewed: May 26, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Avalon
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Bang for the buck. $600 gets you a decent bike.
Weaknesses:
Caged pedals. Right hand rear brake cable comes out when you turn the handle bars hard right. This sucks because if your not watching and it pops out, you're out of rear brakes! Also, Specialized seems to think a lot of their stock front sprockets, but I agree with everyone else...THEY SUCK! Bent the middle ring after 2 rides.
Bike Setup:
Stock except for Specialized comp clipless pedals.
Bottom Line:
The bike is excellent if you swap out the pedals and crakset.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Ryan Spicer
a Cross Country Rider
from Easton, CT, US Date Reviewed: May 25, 2000
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Drivetrain, frame, color, grips, nice metal pedals, light wheels
Weaknesses:
brakes, fork (jett t2), stock tires aren't very good on rocks (isn't it supposed to be a ROCKhopper?)
Bike Setup:
stock except for lx brakes and levers, body geometry comp saddle, specialized team tires
Bottom Line:
good overall, great if you get new brakes, tires, and fork. the jett t2 is a very bad fork overall, not much travel, and too stiff. the bike frame is very soft, it is a high quality frame for the price. this bike climbs really well, and is pretty forgiving for a hardtail. just buy a new fork and it would be worth a lot more
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Nathan Houle
a Cross Country Rider
from Lindon, UT, USA Date Reviewed: April 6, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Slickrock
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
grips, tires good on dirt, sadddle, color (silver), wheels, crank
Weaknesses:
brakes, front dereiller
Similar Products Used:
Trek 6000, Schwinn Moab
Bike Setup:
Stock, but clipless pedals
Bottom Line:
It is a very good bike to grind on the hard uphills, and well balanced for the jumps
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Adam Maas
a Cross Country Rider
from Toronto, Ontario, Canada Date Reviewed: March 18, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Don Valley
Duration Product Used:
More than 3 years
Strengths:
Frame, Wheelset, Value, Tires great in the dirt, Cranks are Stiff and Strong
Weaknesses:
Brakes+Levers, Gripshift Shifters, handlebars, Saddle, Tires useless on the road
Bought 97 rigid, Great Frame, crappy brakes and saddle, gripshifters don't last, what kind of idiot specs a 22" handlebar on a 20.5" bike???. Put a RST281 fork on it, stiffer than the indy or jett, but heavier and useless except for the big bumps. I've replaced just about everything on this bike, but the frame is still going. 20,000KM later( I used to commute on it)Buy the rigid and put a real fork on it, at least a Judy T2. Great Bike for a Big guy (I'm 6'3", 230lbs), especially one who does a lot of road riding on it. Takes a beating without problems
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Frank DuCett
a Weekend Warrior
from Arlington Date Reviewed: March 13, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Cedar Hill State Park
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
None
Weaknesses:
Poor Quality Control, Warped Frames.
Bike Setup:
Stock
Bottom Line:
Warped badly in rear triangle, dealer in Arlington would not cover under warranty. Dealer said frame was in spec, but couldn't adjust rear brakes due to frame being warped.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Michael gibson
a Weekend Warrior
from England (as in UK) Date Reviewed: January 17, 2000
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Frame
Weaknesses:
bars,pedals,seat,stem,BRAKES
Similar Products Used:
you name it, i've ridden it
Bike Setup:
DMR V12, Scott riser bars, Rigid forks(UK Basic spec bike) soon to be judy races XT Brakes
Bottom Line:
Amazing. I love it(I haven't snapped it yet either) Mint for trials Very responsive, and the steel frame is, well unbelievable I've prabably voided the warranty by fitting flat pedals & riser bars though
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Del R. Schiffler
a Weekend Warrior
from St. Paul, MN Date Reviewed: January 10, 2000
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Ride-very smooth & fluid.
Weaknesses:
Seat-replaced w/ Body Geometry seat.
Bike Setup:
No upgrades (except seat)
Bottom Line:
In the past I've only bought cheap $200 bikes. Biking was kind of a chore. After getting this bike, I now know that it pays to spend more. Since I got it in the spring of 1999, I use it whenever I have free time. I can't wait to get on it. My whole attitute about biking has changed. This bike is wonderful. I had to replace the brakes already; but I have 600 miles on it. My only complaint would be the seat. My privates hurt after an hour ride. That was alleviated when I replaced it w/ a Specialized Body Geometry seat. Can't wait 'til spring (live in snowy Minnesota.)
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Bruce
a Weekend Warrior
from Halifax, Nova Scotia Date Reviewed: November 22, 1999
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
The geometry suits me (6 feet, 230 lbs) - felt the most comfortable out of the 4 or 5 bikes I test-rode.Fast and smooth on the trail or on the road...
Weaknesses:
Dia-Compe brakes - the no-name brakes on my everyday hybrid bike are better.Saddle - upgraded to a Body Geometry - great saddle!
Similar Products Used:
Trek, Kona, Specialized Hardrock, Giant - more or less in the same price range
Bike Setup:
Upgraded the Rock Shox Jett C to Marzocchi Z3 suspension.Put some bar ends on.I'll upgrade the brakes next spring.It came with Shimano SPD-type clipless pedals - so I had to get some real cycling shoes - Wow, I'll never go back to toe clips!
Bottom Line:
I bought my new Rockhopper FS mainly for exercise and to get back into trail-riding. It replaced my 15-year old Peugeot mountain bike that saw a lot of commuting on snow and ice (and salted roads). Once I rode the new bike I decided I couldn't put it through the same punishment - it's too nice a bike to do that to! I'll thrash it properly on the trails instead...(I bought a cheap hybrid to ride to work).My rating is biased since I've been riding that old junker for so long!!!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Lou Frascogna
a Weekend Warrior
from Jackson, MS Date Reviewed: October 31, 1999
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Frame (Nitanium)
Weaknesses:
Saddle, Pedals, Front Derailleur, Tires, Shocks, Seat Post
Similar Products Used:
Trek 930, Trek 6000
Bike Setup:
I we'll changed almost everything but the frame. Rock Shox SID XC, XT Drivetrain, Stumpjumper Wheelset, Team Master Comp Tires, Specialized Prolong Revolution Saddle, Specialized Bar Ends.
Bottom Line:
Don't get me wrong I love this bike to death, but that is due to the frame mostly. I wanted a Cro-moly frame and this was the only upper end one. I pretty much have completely upgraded the bike as you can see in the set up, which may be a bit overkill but somethings had to be replaced: Seat post (my only real real complaint, on a ride it completely stripped, but it is a pain in the butt to find a 30.4mm seat post), Pedals (pieces of crap), Front derailleur (Specialized went cheap on us there), Saddle (c'mon it sucked), Shocks (good enough but I wanted something bigger and better, I'm a big boy). The wheels and tires weren't necessary but I got a good deal on em and they look spanking. I recommend the frame and maybe just the frame, but for the price it is the best deal on the market for the whole bike
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
tony salmon
a Weekend Warrior
from kingston Date Reviewed: October 26, 1999
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
good value
Weaknesses:
well where do i begin ( those reading this thinking i miss treat my bike i just ride hard ok ) I replaced the bar for and azonic world force and the improvement in widthn and rise has dramaticlay enhanced my controll and comfort the crank set had to be replaced because one of then becasme twisted, for thos of you who jump you know you always have one foot in front, and the one at the back is taking and backwards downwards force that it hasn't been designed for . Also the chainrings became so messed up do trials, and i cant find a 42 bash guard.The rims , well basically anything beyonund road work will bend them. I've replaced the rear with a mavic D521 laced to an lx hub and on an specialized eveil twin dh tyre, 2.2 wide, with the overlapping bead, ok in theory it doesn't work but i kept geting ripped sidewalls with the old specialzed tyres.
Similar Products Used:
kona cindercone and roast
Bike Setup:
rockhopper frame , rst 381r fork , world force bar , 636 pedals d521 rear rim
Bottom Line:
well i suppose i dont rate this bike that highly because i've changed my riding stlye considerably in the last 6 months . the frame is good but in intend to change it for either a zaskar of Ds1 soon, but if you ride cross country this bike is fine . The problem is i had too high expectations for it and assumed it could do everything which it could'nt. Iam diappointed , but with myself, for getting the wrong bike but at the time it was perfect . it has however given me a good platform to develop my riding onand when i get my new frame i'll have most of the parts .The rockhopper may be the classic mountain bike but it is certainly not a do it all bike and this has annoyeed me
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jonathan Moorley
a Weekend Warrior
from Chichester Date Reviewed: October 13, 1999
Favorite Trail:
The pits
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Good for trails, trials and jumping. light sturdy frame. value product
Weaknesses:
none yet
Similar Products Used:
muddy fox x2
Bike Setup:
indy c ( better than jett c
Bottom Line:
a must by budget bike good for trials and jumping as well as x country
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Ian
a Weekend Warrior
from Edinburgh Date Reviewed: August 27, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Cardrona Forrest
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Groupset Weight Overall Value
Weaknesses:
Brakes Saddle Front Deraillieur Toe Clips
Similar Products Used:
Trek 830shx Fisher Tassahara
Bike Setup:
XT Brakes Body Geometry Sport Saddle XT Front Der. Profile Bar Ends
Bottom Line:
Excellent overall value for money.Brakes are pretty poor, especially in stopping power. Rear caliper rubbed on rim all the time. Replaced with XT levers and calipers.Front Gear is STX-RC, not as good as the rest of the drive train. Replaced with XT.Saddle is very uncomfortable, replaced with Body Geometry Sport. Excellent!Overall a good bike and a few upgrades turn it into a great bike.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
A guy
a Weekend Warrior
from Arizona Date Reviewed: August 27, 1999
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
frame, wheelset, tires
Weaknesses:
pedals, fork
Similar Products Used:
Mongooses, Haros, Raleighs
Bike Setup:
Manitou fork, Profile bar-ends, clipless pedals
Bottom Line:
really a pretty good bike for the money. It has all of the features needed to go off road, and the frame is lively, yet forgiving. however, the fork isn't too great, it isn't very plush. the pedals held up, but if you want to handle better get clipless. great value, great bike.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
BLintz
a Weekend Warrior
from Atlanta, GA. Date Reviewed: August 22, 1999
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
It's made by Specialized.Excellent quality for the price.
Weaknesses:
Pedals.Saddle.Front components.
Bottom Line:
I love this bike.Great value at $600 (17% greater at $500 sale price.)Handles tight and, at 28 lbs., is hardly a monster.I agree with the critics- the pedals blow and the saddle's a babykiller.LX components in the front would be nice.No complaints thus far with the shocks or the brakes.I found the Rockhopper fs to be the best deal in the $500-$1000 range.Cinquo butt-burners for this bad boy!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Brian Trevelyan
a Weekend Warrior
from Pudsey, Yorkshire Date Reviewed: August 6, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Fulneck/Cockersdale valleys
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
shifters,drivetrain,frame,tyres,shocks. Responsive handling. Good value!
Weaknesses:
Pedals! Brakes...Maybe the saddle. Preload adjusters on the shocks.
Similar Products Used:
A horse, a car, some girls, but this is my first MTB.
Bike Setup:
All as supplied.
Bottom Line:
Bought after a lot of looking, due to OK reviews and impressive specs (relatively speaking), and the recommendation of the dealer over several similar priced bikes (choice was between this and a Fisher Tequesta). Ive ridden mine on some rough stuff and also use it to ride the 8 miles and a bit to work along a canal towpath. I disagree with the reviews which slag the Jett T2's: They've been fine for me on everything I've thrown them over or off of. But the preload adjusters need to be easier to grip and need better click-stops to make equal adjustment easier. The pedals are toss, and a bike this good really should have spuds as standard. One of mine has already had to have a new bearing set! Also, the saddle seems a little uncomfy, but that might be my soft arse that's not yet adjusted to being on a bike. The brakes don't spring away from the rims as easily as they should and often rub, but they stop the bike Ok, though I guess from the comments there are probably beter brakes available. My chain bust after only 2 months, and I dunno why. BUT...the machine has been generally great, and the niggles are only small ones, apart from the pedals, which are my arse squared. Please take note of this, Specialized please note! Great bike for the brass, but put SPD's on it, please! And whilst you're at it, send me some as thanks for my objective review. As i've nowt to compare it with, I'll give it 4 and a half chilis (lose a half for the pedals).
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Laura
a Cross-Country Rider
from CT Date Reviewed: August 6, 1999
Favorite Trail:
wallingford, middlesex, chester...
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
- the light frame - smooth shifting
Weaknesses:
- the saddle (ouch) - the breaks
Bike Setup:
stock except I had the pedals changed.
Bottom Line:
I have to agree with several of the other messages ~ I think this is a good bike for a smaller person, I went with the 15 inch frame - I have plenty of stand over room. My last bike was too big and heavy so this is a nice change. Some people have mentioned the shock isn't what they'd like, but it seems fine to me. I'm wondering if this bike is better suited to lighter/smaller/or female folks?This is a nice light bike which handles well. My hill climbing has tremendously improved. I do feel a little out of control on the downhills because I'm bouncing all over the place - my last bike was pretty heavy, so it's just a change in the feel for me.The seat really sucks. It's definitely hard on the rear. My breaks aren't as good as my old Giant's...plus they squeal sometimes. They do stop me though, so it's not like I'm in danger ~ but they could be better.I'm very pleased with my choice. I also really like the brushed steel color.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Ingrid
a Cross-Country Rider
from Ottawa, Canada Date Reviewed: July 22, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Gatineau Park
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Price Frame Components
Weaknesses:
Saddle
Similar Products Used:
Kona Lave Dome Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo Trek 6500 Specialized Hardrock
Bike Setup:
I changed the saddle ( a must), stem (shorter), handlebar (22 inch low riser), pedals, and tires.
Bottom Line:
I bought the rigid model because I use the bike mostly to commute (44Km round trip) on roads and light trails. The 13 size is a great find for small people; I'm 5 feet tall and love the way the Rockhopper handles. I put on Specialized Mt Baldy tires, which perform well on both road and trail. I've had no problems at all. All in all, great value for the money.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jeff Wong
a Cross-Country Rider
from Victoria Date Reviewed: July 21, 1999
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
The LX derailleur is pretty good but the STX-RC isn't all that great, nice tires,
Weaknesses:
The brakes are so bad, i hate the Dia-Compe brakes. Also the shocks can't absorb anything
Bottom Line:
This bike is the best bike in its price range, but they should have used avid or shimano brakes. But i still love my bike!!!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Ancipital
a Weekend Warrior
from UK Date Reviewed: July 19, 1999
Favorite Trail:
epsom downs
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Good value for money Forgiving retro chromoly build Mostly LX equipped
Various ridegebacks Cannondale f700 Specialized FSR XC, stumpjumper, stumpjumper FSR XC Various Marin, Scott
Bike Setup:
Brakes swapped for 99 LX v-brakes (a must have) Specialized body geometry comp saddle Shimano SPD-ish pedals 99 LX front mech
Bottom Line:
This bike is what I'd term entry-level for real riding.First off- the frame.. It's a Ritchey Nitranium cromo frame, so it's not as light as an alu, but it is quite forgiving. The geometry is awkward, offering very little standover, compared to say, a typical Scott hardtail.The cheap and nasty Wellgo pedals are awful. They are some of the worst I have ever used. They snagged on ALL shoes I tried. They were ripped off and replaced with some decent SPDs sharpsih.The supplied dia-compe brakes were really bad. They squeaked, and barely slowed the bike at all, and fought every inch of the way. A nice pair of 99 LX v brakes soon sorted that. 100% better, and lighter to boot.The front mech wasn't LX, but a lower end shimano, and was rather sluggish and not all that precise. Again, I upgraded that, to bring it into like with the excellent 99LX shifters and rear mech (and my shiny new v-brakes!). The saddle was rather cheesey. I replaced it with a Body Geo comp (the type with the kevlar corners and manganese rails), thus trimming some more weight and making the bike a lot more comfy.My only remaining beef is with the cheap and nasty Rockshox Jett T2 shocks. After giving them a hammering, I notices that they had quite a lot of flex. What's more, they kick the shock right back at you. An upgrade to some nicely damped Manitous will be my next big purchase. I liked the shortish straight alu bars and the long stem. They gave me very sold control and comfort, and kept the bike going the way I wanted it to. I stuck a pair of Profile carbon fibre bar ends on, to help with climbing, and the bike climbs as well as something in that weight class can be expected too. The tyres are reasonable, and cope nicely with the sort of cruddy, muddy terrain they get faced with.I did find that it helped a lot to get a lizardskin on the chainstay, mind you. Being relatively heavy and rigid, chainslap is fact of life. However, on such a simple frame, the 'skin gave it a bit of a BMX look, and works like a dream :) All in all, it's a very interesting attempt. It's a good entry level bike for someone on a budget, as you can replace the worst parts as finances allow. In order, the bits I'd change are: pedals, brakes, seat, front mech, shocks.However, with a little tweaking, and if you get to know it well, it's a solid bike, with very predictable performance. Something of a classic retro hardtail, at an ideal price for a weekend warrior on a budget :) I'll give it three burning devil mice, plus an extra one for the low low price.. Once it's upgraded, it's a very entertaining old fashioned thrashable bike, and pretty solid to boot. Hammertime fun :)
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Kristin
a Cross-Country Rider
from Anacortes,Wa Date Reviewed: July 15, 1999
Favorite Trail:
most local trails
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
This is a fantastic bike to learn on and develope my skills. It was affordable and the components and geometry are well suited to my abilities and and small stature.
Weaknesses:
If platform peddles are a weakness I will use them to my advantage in learning bunny hopping and wheelies then change to clipless next spring. Toeing in the breaks helped squealling and improved performance.
Similar Products Used:
Rockhopper rigid
Bike Setup:
Stock 13 inch frame
Bottom Line:
I am having so much fun riding. I can't complain. In my opinion, this seems like an ideal bike for beginning riders. I expect this bike and I will be riding the trails for a long time.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
James
a Weekend Warrior
from Ithaca, NY Date Reviewed: July 9, 1999
Favorite Trail:
dirty ones
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Almost everything on the bike, except the shocks.
Weaknesses:
As I've already said, the shocks aren't great and the brakes are a little dodgy.
Similar Products Used:
Gary Fisher Marin Raleigh M60 Some Mongoose and GT bikes.
Bike Setup:
Upgraded shocks to Manitou SXR and changed pedals (they were sort of crap)
Bottom Line:
It's a great bike, I haven't had any problems with it at all. Like I say change the shocks (anything but the Jett's) and you've got a fantastic bike.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
John
a Weekend Warrior
from Winthrop, Maine Date Reviewed: July 7, 1999
Favorite Trail:
all so far
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Value Components Geometry Weight
Weaknesses:
Toe Clips are weak! No quick release seat
Similar Products Used:
Moab 3 Raleigh M80
Bike Setup:
Stock, Jett T2 STX front LX rear
Bottom Line:
This bike Rocks for the $$. Still new to the sport but I have a long way to go before I'll need to change anything. I will switch to clipless pedals first. I'll review again after a few more months, but this ride gets 5 HOT CHILI'S for this rider
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
TONY SALMON
a Weekend Warrior
from kingston Surrey England Date Reviewed: July 1, 1999
Favorite Trail:
single track in Richmond and downhill runs also jump spots at cobham and teddington
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
The bike is great for cross country and the steel frame gives you a good feel of the terrain. The bike has a high spec and is light and nimble. The ride position is perfect and easy to do jumps, downhill and urban stunts
Weaknesses:
I needed to change the pedals strait away for a pair of shimano 636 SPD The original Dia-Comp brakes are a bit weak . Also when replacing the rear wheel in the drop outs the paintwork is badly scratched.
Similar Products Used:
My old pile of shite A raligh max
Bike Setup:
I didn't buy the bike with the suspention forks as I felt it was not a good investment. It is heavy and unmanourable and poorly adjusted( I test rode it )I have not enetered this review in the rigid hardtails rockhopper section as there isn't one . I prefered to save £100 and invest it in a better fork such as an RST Mozo. One this subject will the 3in + of travel alter my frame geometrey so much that the bike will lift up on climes? Will I have to lose an inch in sag to prevent this.As I'm a freerider this fork seems ideal but is there too much travel. The price of it is too good to pass off
Bottom Line:
It's a great bike for someone who wants a bike to start taking MTBing seriously. It can be upgraded to your own spec so I earge any reader about to buy a rockhopper FS to get the rigid, save £100 and wait a bit to get a decent fork. It is a much better investment and you'll have to replace the jett within a year or so Again this is a great bike but if you are slowly turning towards downhill bear in mind that the frame is designed for crosscountry and that the frame geometreies are too aggresive for downhill racing. If you buy it and still want to do downhill get some risers and flatties but be warned.Igive the Rockhopper FS 4 and the Rockhopper rigid 5 as you have saved £100 to spend on a decent fork
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Homer
a Cross-Country Rider
from WI Date Reviewed: June 28, 1999
Favorite Trail:
hard pack single track
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
components, weight, value!!!
Weaknesses:
cranks, front derail., Dia-Compe brakes, and it doesn't come w/ bar ends
Similar Products Used:
Schwinn Moab/Homegrown
Bike Setup:
I added bar ends, and swapped out the factory grips
Bottom Line:
This bike performs excellent under most any conditions. It is a competetive, race-ready bike out of the box with only minor adjustments/upgrades. The biggest selling point though, is its value, including high-end factory component groups.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Dave
a Cross-Country Rider
from Troy Date Reviewed: June 21, 1999
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
drivetrain, comfort, value
Weaknesses:
DiaCompe brakes
Similar Products Used:
fisher tassajara giant Iguana
Bike Setup:
I added a body geometry seat, and clipless pedals.
Bottom Line:
The bike rides great. It is fast and responsive on dirt and pavement. It gets great air, I am always looking for places to launch from. This bike is alot of fun for only $600. I give it 5.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Mike
a Weekend Warrior
from NC Date Reviewed: June 18, 1999
Favorite Trail:
AnyWhere
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Price Component Group Geometry
Similar Products Used:
Giant Rincon Old Diamondback Topanga Several Schwinns
Bike Setup:
Stock: T2 fork, Stx front, lx rear and shifters
Bottom Line:
I just started really riding to get in shape, but I think the bike is great. For me the geometry works great. It's good on the trail and on the road. Certainly it's my skill level, not the bike that would hold me back.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jack ass
a Cross-Country Rider
from Sheffield England Date Reviewed: June 10, 1999
Favorite Trail:
All of 'em
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Weight Price Suspension Components
Weaknesses:
Pedals Seat Brakes
Similar Products Used:
klein, Kona Scott
Bike Setup:
Flat bars, Spd pedals
Bottom Line:
Nice riding position, comfy ride, a super all-rounder, with a nice price tag. Groupset is good, but the brakes let the bike down. This bike is a very well equiped all-rounder, it is not a specific down hill, X.C bike it is simply a fun to ride bike with no real intended purpose, it can be used for trails, X.C racing and even the little bit of downhilling, and not feel out of place, I give it 5 chille peppers.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Chaz
a Cross-Country Rider
from Sheffield, England Date Reviewed: June 10, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Red Bull, Wales
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Good suspension, Nice light frame, Good value groupset, good grip tyres for average U.K weather.
Weaknesses:
Crap toe clips, gears slipping (due to 9 speed block) good after adjustment. Extremly difficult to take tyre off.
Similar Products Used:
Orange clockwork, Kona Lava Dome.
Bottom Line:
Good budget X.C bike, would sell a lot more if came with spd's. Crap brakes, I replaced them. I give it 4 hot turds.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Dave
a Weekend Warrior
from Wayland, MA Date Reviewed: June 2, 1999
Great bike, i bought it after i found out it would cost just as much to upgrade my 97 rockhopper, essencially the same bike, but with better components. It would have been nice to have a quick release on the seat, i had to move my old one over.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Grant
a Weekend Warrior
from Alabama(US) Date Reviewed: May 30, 1999
Favorite Trail:
chicksabogue park
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
very light,easy maintenance
Weaknesses:
had problem with shifters
Similar Products Used:
none
Bike Setup:
i changed the shocks to Judy XC's
Bottom Line:
good overall bike; it's worth every bit you spend.I give it two thumbs up.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
TMB
a Cross-Country Rider
from Iowa Date Reviewed: May 14, 1999
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Components Weight Price Ride
Weaknesses:
Brakes(Need too much adjustment) Toe Clips are Junk, Replaced with ones from my old bike.
Similar Products Used:
GT, Schwinn, Trek
Bike Setup:
99 23 model all Stock X-cept Toe clips
Bottom Line:
Great bike for the $$, An unbelievable improvement over my '93 Schwinn High Plains. It's a Keeper!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Tammo Rieg
a Cross-Country Rider
from Chester, UK Date Reviewed: April 25, 1999
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Value for money Looks Brakes
Weaknesses:
Saddle
Similar Products Used:
GT Tequesta Trek 930
Bike Setup:
Standard Added bar ends & mudguards
Bottom Line:
Neat bike. Much lighter than I expected - lighter than my friend's aluminium frame Dawes Edge, even though his bike doesn't have front suspension. Build quality looks fine, but the left gear lever failed after 2 weeks. Enjoy riding position (I am 6'1 on a 19 frame), but the saddle isn't very comfy.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Tim Devlin
a Cross-Country Rider
from Taunton,MA Date Reviewed: April 19, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Massasoit State Park
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Price Components Weight Brakes
Weaknesses:
Drivetrain Pedals
Bike Setup:
Rock Shox Indy C
Bottom Line:
Great bike for someone that wants to get started with some serious biking. Would like to upgrade my shocks and derailers. Have very hard time shifting when strain is put on the gears. Can't beat the price for what you get. I paid $500 for this bike and it was worth every penny.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Luke
a Cross-Country Rider
from Newcastle (UK) Date Reviewed: April 18, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Anywhere with mud
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Price Components (Colour - sad, I know...)
Weaknesses:
Pedals
Similar Products Used:
Similarly priced GT, Kona, Trek, Raleigh etc
Bike Setup:
Standard
Bottom Line:
Didn't see any UK reviews for this, so I thought I'd post one. I bought this a couple of months ago, based on price, magazine reviews and a couple of test rides, and I've got to say that I'm really impressed with it. It handles really well off road (and on! - I ride to work on mine and I've cut a couple of minutes off the trip time, compared to my old rigid bike, which didn't handle the kerb jumping etc as well) As someone who has always been a bit dubious about suspension I've had to change my mind after riding this - the bike is still light, easy to maintain and LOTS more fun. I don't think there is a better bike at this price in this category at the moment, so I'm giving it the full 5 stars.....
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Tommy
a Cross-Country Rider
from Denver, Colorado Date Reviewed: April 4, 1999
Favorite Trail:
SlickRock
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Best nitanium (steel Frame--Co-Mo)for the money Weight is above average Good components Great hubs Price is excellent for hardtail and options
Weaknesses:
Low end pedals stock tires stock fork--average
Similar Products Used:
Gt Older model Rockhopper
Bike Setup:
upgraded to Manitou Sx R Upgraded to Specialized riser bars 24 wide Upgraded to Fear Control team tires
Bottom Line:
We are talking steel frame/hardtails here. Once you buy above this model your into Aluminum. For the money, this is the best buy, especially if you can upgrade a few things like the shock and tires. I did and the bike runs exceptionally well. The tires improved the traction and ride (cant beat the iron-curtain 127 team fear Control). The upgraded shock was worth the $150! Manitou SXR is a great system and color! I have the 21 blue frame, it comes in at about 27lbs, the tires add some weight, but it doesn't really matter for the everyday, downhiller, cross-country rider like me. This bike gets 5 chilis easy! Specialized has excellent geometry which equals riding comfort, weight is great, get some upgrades and youve got a real winner with this match-up! When you compare price and performance, no other hardtail can come close! Sweet!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Big John
a Cross-Country Rider
from Edgewood, NM Date Reviewed: April 2, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Yahoo Canyon, NM
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
weight components price geometry
Weaknesses:
index shifters
Similar Products Used:
replaced my old Rockhopper comp
Bike Setup:
upgraded shock to Manitou SX Upgraded tires to specialized team, 2.2 upgraded bars to risers
Bottom Line:
For the money, no one can touch it. For a steel frame, hardtail, it performs well. Weight is not bad either considering...With the upgraded shock, the bike is choice, especially for the money.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
George
a Cross-Country Rider
from Arlington Texas Date Reviewed: March 26, 1999
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Bottom Line:
An unbeatable value! All name brand components, great ride on or off road. Shifts and stops on a dime (and gives a nickle change).I love it!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Bill
a Weekend Warrior
from NY,NY Date Reviewed: March 24, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Minnewaska
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Weight, Price, Components
Weaknesses:
Forks
Similar Products Used:
G.T. Comparisons
Bottom Line:
People who complain about the weight of this bike don't have a bike shop with a scale. I compared this to similarly priced Aluminum and Chromoly bikes from G.T. and this was 1 to 3 pounds lighter. THe 17 model I purchased for my son weighed in at 28 pounds while the G.T. was 30. (Chromoly Bike)
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Zack
a weekend warrior
from USA Date Reviewed: February 12, 1999
Bottom Line:
I bought this bike because my old bike was TOO old and crummy. I'd had for about 3 to 4 years and I never rode it until this last year when I began to mountain bike. My new bike shifts about three times as fast and is a lot lighter. I will never go back to a bike with out a suspension fork again.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
John Doe
a weekend warrior
from USA Date Reviewed: February 12, 1999
Bottom Line:
This a pretty sweet bike and it is a better deal than it was last year. It now comes with LX components which is better than what last year's model had. In fact the only thing that I don't like is the Jett T2's. It should have some Manitou's or better Rock Shox's, these T2's suck. Overall a sweet bike.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
chris
a cross-country rider
from kansas Date Reviewed: January 31, 1999
Bottom Line:
rode my friends rh and i cant say i was very impressed with it its very heavy, i think around 30 pounds. it also has a fork that is a real piece it's springy as heck every time you hit a bump the whole bike flys upinto the air cause of the backlash of the stupid thing (this was offroad and it might be diffrent on the road but that kills the whole reason for buying it in the first place) and yes i did try to adjust it but was still absolutely terrible . the only good things about this bike is the aggressive specialized geometry and the reasonably good components. But hey my friend likes it a lot!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
JW
a weekend warrior
from Indiana Date Reviewed: January 22, 1999
Bottom Line:
I rented a rockhopper on a trip I went on in Mexico, the trails were very rough the up-hills major thigh killers, gave it all the abuse my body and the trail could dish out! frame,wheels,tires,forks all get 5 tamales, the drivetrain not so good, only had six gears left by the end of the ride. upgrade the casette and derailers. It didnt impress me enough to go home and sell my GT.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Aaron
a cross-country rider
from Honolulu Date Reviewed: December 22, 1998
Bottom Line:
I bought the bike for its value and I must say that you do get a good bike for the price. I use the Bike to commute and ride trails and the Rockhopper performs well on both. The Fork is plush and the ride is comfortable. Yet, the bike is still a bit heavy when compared to an Aluminum frame hardtail.
Overall Rating:
What's New
»
BEST OF MTBR - Check out the highest rated bikes, parts, & gear!
»
LED BIKE LIGHT SHOOTOUT 3 - We test all the newest products and latest light and battery technology in this comprehensive guide»
$ 599.99
Overall Rating:
Overall Rating:
Overall Rating:
