Submitted by
Don
a Weekend Warrior
from Williamston,Mi Date Reviewed: February 8, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Highland
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Purchased At:
Central Park Cycles
Strengths:
Sweet ride. Just enough and not too much.
Weaknesses:
None for the price
Similar Products Used:
Super V,LTS, just about all others owned or demoed
Bike Setup:
XTR,WTB Speed V saddle(sweet)Thomson,Vanilla R
Bottom Line:
With a decent retail and a few mods I have a bike that I really don't need to replace. I usually like to get a new bike every year or so but I am still having a great time on this bike.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Kevin
a Cross Country Rider
from Peoria, AZ, USA Date Reviewed: January 4, 2002
Favorite Trail:
South Mountain, Phx, AZ
Duration Product Used:
More than 3 years
Price Paid:
$13000.00
Purchased At:
Dominic's
Strengths:
Tracks well Stiff, latterally Fast Light Awesome climber
Weaknesses:
Not enough travel in the rear Shock bushings wear out fast
Similar Products Used:
Pro Flex 856
Bike Setup:
99 Stumpjumper FSR XC, Race Face Turbine, XTR brakes and levers, Sram 9.0 drive train, Easton Monkey Carbon Riser, Fox Float R (Soon to add a BETD link) Profile stem, Easton EA50 seat post, XT Casette, Zocchi Z2 Atom 80,
Bottom Line:
This bike blows my old Pro Flex away. This bike tracks well and with the Bomber can take the big hits as well as the small bumps. The PF had some nasty bob up hill. The Horst link eleminates the dreaded bob. I can't say enough about this bike. I have had it since 1999 and will not trade it for any other rig. It is fast, down hill or up. This is the bike to have. The Horst link is the greatist invention ever. After all, Titus and Intense use it, it must be good. If you love t oclimb and bomb down hill this is the bike for you. If you like the down hill thing, there is the FSR Enduro, same bike, heavy duty parts. See ya on the trail.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
will
a Weekend Warrior
from uk Date Reviewed: May 31, 2001
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$200.00
Purchased At:
privately
Strengths:
I bought this frame 2nd hand for £225 a couple of months ago, and built it up my self. I ride mostly in the Lake District and this bike is ideally suited to rocky terrain. It climbs better than a hardtail as well as decending better and there is very little bob on flat terrain/ road.
Weaknesses:
Rear shock has no rebound damping! stock bushings have loads of stiction (possibly to get round this) but when replaced with BETD bearings the shock needs rebound control! Apparently stock cranks and tires are nothing to write home about, but I bought the frame only.
Similar Products Used:
Marin FRSs, proflex, etc
Bike Setup:
1998 90mm Pace RC36's, Hope/Mavic/XT/XTR/Deore.
Bottom Line:
Include a BETD link and bearings in the price if you buy one of these! The ride is great as standard but is fantastic with BETD kit.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jim Hopkinson
a Cross Country Rider
from Seattle, WA Date Reviewed: May 13, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Tiger Mountain
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Price Paid:
$1400.00
Purchased At:
The Bike Shop
Strengths:
Climbs great, decends awesome. Virtually no maintenance. Looks great. Full suspension is worth every penny.
Bike Setup:
Stock plus bar ends.
Bottom Line:
** This is an update from my original posting on 9/16/99 **
I always liked it when bike/car magazines do an article where they go back and review a product after using it for some time. Because lets face it, ANY bike should be a dream to ride right off the showroom floor. How does it perform in the real world 18 months later?
Well, after riding it for over a year and a half I can't tell you how much I love this bike. It has performed flawlessly. I know a lot of it is because I've been riding more, but I am 10 times the rider I was before I got the full suspension. And that's the key... it's a viscious cycle. You get a new bike, so you want to ride. When you ride a nicer bike with full suspension, you get more confidence. As you gain confidence, the ride becomes more fun. As riding becomes more fun, you want to ride more. The more you ride, the better you get. You get the picture.
After a particularly treacherous downhill, I can't help but feel pity for the hardtailers in the group. I can soak up just about anything. All I know is that every time I hear that 'whoosh' of the rear shock, I know that there's a pounding that my butt/back isn't taking.
If you were like me, you might be stuggling with the price question. Let me say that 1) moving up to the full suspension was worth every penny 2) I haven't put a dime into this bike since I've bought it
I have friends that ride REALLY hard, and I've seen them break chains, taco rims, blow out hubs, crack bar ends, get flat tires, replace shocks and even damage frames. Maybe it's my riding style or I'm just damn lucky, but I just throw some lube on the chain and go. (The front shock that I wrote was sticky to start - it just needed a few weeks to break in).
Lastly, I've seen many complaints about hard seats, bad tires, crappy pedals and so forth. Let me say this. For some reason I'm not bothered by any of this. Some people will do (and spend) anything to shave a few grams off their bike, while others ride on the sidewalk. I'm somewhere in the middle. I've done three races, tackle some hard trails, and consider myself a decent rider. I'm sure I could spend another $1000 to get better tires, a fancy seat and 100% XTR components, but right now I don't think the difference would overwhelm me. Maybe I'm like a Honda Accord owner who has never driven a Porsche so doesn't know what he's missing.
Bottom line? I ride for the fun, the exercise, the scenery, the comraderie and the thrill of riding - and this bike has made all of the above enjoyable.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Tim
a Weekend Warrior
from Fresno Date Reviewed: October 22, 2000
This bike climbs well for a FS. Even after putting the big 4.75" travel Manitous on it. bike sticks like glue in the single track. Suggest upgrading to full MSP bearing kit for the rear. This will reduce the climbing ability as you get more peddle input but will improve the overall feel of the bike. No more sevice to the linkage. The bike is a little small on the top tube. Something they have changed on the new 2001 bikes. For the price I paid I could not have gotten a better bike.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
james
a Cross Country Rider
from ottawa,ont,can Date Reviewed: October 16, 2000
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Strengths:
light, resonably stiff, good xc, xtr rear
Weaknesses:
nervous dh-longer forks better? oem granny ring sucks-wear and availability an issue. waited over a month for new ring due to bolt pattern and lack of stock from any dealers. think I prefer feel of oil shock for front. tires are poor for wet and roots.
Similar Products Used:
giant, trek, cannondale, pro flex
Bike Setup:
stock setup+747 pedals. went stiffer in air shock for weight as I like a stiffer ride for hills
Bottom Line:
would buy again, but would be wary of specialized parts and would try to upgrade as part of deal. good bike for xc rider who wants to take edge off terain-used to ride Trek 8000 hard tail w. oil shock and back would be dead after rough rides (39 yr riding with 20-30 yr hammer heads). good hill climbing, good weight.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Darrell
a Cross Country Rider
from San Juan island WA Date Reviewed: October 9, 2000
Favorite Trail:
North Boundry @ Moran St. PK
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Purchased At:
LBS
Strengths:
Weight, performance, price
Weaknesses:
cranks, pedals, rear shock (no rebound control)
Bike Setup:
XT Crank with REAL rings, Time ATAC, Risse Astro 5 with GP Link, Bontrager Jones tires, SWorks 130MM stem.
Bottom Line:
Besides getting rid of the junk cranks and pedals which everyone else has mentioned already, the best change I made was the Risse rear shock and 4" travel link. While dealing with Risse was an experience that seems to be all to common in this market the end result is worth it. A much smoother and plusher travel that soaks up the big bumps far better than the old Fox shock. Now if I can upgrade the Manitou SX to something that can match up to the Risse I will really be ready to rock.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Glen M
a Weekend Warrior
from Ottawa Ont. Can. Date Reviewed: August 10, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Gatineau's
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Frame- geometry, Shimano guts, price.
Weaknesses:
This is a follow up review. I have had time to thrash this bike a bit, and I swore I would be objective after some riding. Here is my story. I ride 3-5 times a week if lucky. Hilly, rocky, rooty, terrain. It has been stupidly wet this season, and I tend to ride bikes hard. I have also competed in a 24hr race that was cancelled due to rain, not any type of rain, torrential, gail force poop. So maybe therein lies some problems. As mentioned by many here on mtb, the specialized components break. So far I replaced middle chain ring, (skipped 2nd week in to riding). Rear hub, seized. It is on warranty and has been away for 1.5 months ( I bought a mavic 519 with lx hub as a backup, thank god). Rear suspension pivots were toast after 2 weeks. Steering tube bottom bearing seized after 4 months. This is a very high maintenance bike. The 9 speed works well only if you keep it clean!!!!! I guess 'cause it's my first susp bike that this is normal, and that the rain we've had is really messing things up. Specialized warranty work takes months to get organized. If I was down all that time without back up stuff from my shop, I'd loose it. But that ride! The steering! Climbing! Very sweet! I like that stuff lot's! Makes all the hard work worth it!
Similar Products Used:
Lot's o bikes
Bike Setup:
Riser bar, lizard skin on the rear shock, rear rim Mavic 519- Lx hub. Xt middle chain ring. Bontrager stem. Will replace more after I beat it up some and needs replacing. Probably stay with Shimano, no problems here!
Bottom Line:
Great for what I paid. And I am getting to know this bike well with all the work I put into it. It is fast and comfortable. But specialized, please don't crap out on the compnents. That middle chain ring and hub is a farce!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Andrew
a Weekend Warrior
from Shrewsbury Date Reviewed: August 7, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Upton State Forest
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Strengths:
Great overall bike...espicially for the $$$
Weaknesses:
Bike said it came with a SX-R...but it really had only a SX
Similar Products Used:
Sugar 3
Bike Setup:
Stock everything plus I put on Easton Monkey Bars
Bottom Line:
Great Bike...this thing is really fast. My last bike was a hardtail rockhopper A1 FS and now this bike in comparrison seems like a dream. Great suspension , great look, great everything. You cant go wrong with Specialized ...This bike Rocks!!!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
David Broome
a Cross Country Rider
from Marin County, California Date Reviewed: July 24, 2000
Favorite Trail:
paradigm
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Good climber, good single-tracker, good downhiller, 1,400 mtb miles and still going. Bought in Dec. 99.
Weaknesses:
Specialized parts substandard (Deore-level)- cranks flex w/ hard to find non-shimano chainrings, both hubs blew-up, Manitou fork blew, front deraileur blew, Rear swing arm cracked @ main pivot @ 1,100 miles, on third bushing kit, sealed bearing pivot next to go. Rear lateral flex when bushings start to go. Not a good foul weather FS bike due to shock and bushing positioning.
Similar Products Used:
S-Works hard-tail, Santa Cruz Superlight
Bike Setup:
Now, all XTR. Marzocchi Atom Bomb, Stratos XC Pro rear shock. Roughly 26.5 lbs. w/ Michelin 1.9 Wildgrippers. It's a $3,000+ bike after you replace all the blown parts.
Bottom Line:
Mixed. Perfomance is very good. Great all-around FS XC bike for long days on rough trails. Very plush and fairly light. Outstanding on rough climbs and decents. Still wins the light/cheap value equation in the FS XC market. However, the Specialized parts were a big disappointment.
Also, the Specialized warranty has incentives that might cause your local shop to think twice about replacing broken parts. Ask 'em.
Still waiting for a sub-25 lb. FS-XC w/ disk- brakes for under $2,000.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Mark Crawford
a Cross Country Rider
from King's Park,NY USA Date Reviewed: May 31, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Rocky Point
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
When everything is working on this bike, it rocks! It is truly light, the suspension is efficient, and it handles well.
Weaknesses:
Chainrings and crank, cassettes, three frame breaks, blown front and rear shocks,bad tires,no shock pump,etc.
Similar Products Used:
Trek Y-5
Bike Setup:
Manitou SX Carbon, XT Hollowtech crankset, Speedplay Frogs, Sun Zeo Degree Lights on XT Hubs,XTR cassette, Bontrager Jones or Revolt XT's, Specialized ultralight tubes.
Bottom Line:
This bike was a huge improvement over the Trek Y frame. It climbs better and doesn't steer off a corner if you hit the brakes halfway through. It is light, efficient, and predictable. The rear shock can pack up and hop over stutter bumps, but this is really a minor problem. The major problem has been the three subframes I've broken in less than a year. The warranty covers this but doesn't help me when I'm trudging miles down the trail bleeding. Within a month of getting the bike, I had to replace the middle chainring, the front fork, the rear swingarm, and the tires which were useless on anything but hardpack. The chainrings and crank are junk and Specialized should be ashamed to put them on a bike in this price range. The small ring quickly wore out, causing suck, and can't be replaced with a Shimano becase the bolt pattern is wrong.The 9 speed cassettes bent while climbing and I had to replace them twice. Finally I called Shimano and they sent me an XTR cassette that stays straight. The rear shock needed to be rebuilt, and the front leaked the first day I rode. The rear wheel developed a spoke breakage problem; the spokes were breaking off the nipple ends, and Specialized replaced the whole wheel. I have since replaced the whole wheelset. I replaced the crankset and bottom bracket with the new XT Hollowtech atthe same time as the wheels, and along with the lighter tires and tubes, the bike was hugely improved. I ride about five times a week and I can break things, but I have to say that the Trek full suspension and 8 speed gear NEVER broke. I guess that Shimano, Manitiu, and Fox all get some blame, too. But there is no excusing that Specialized crankset and the three broken swingarms. The bottom line is a real love-hate relationship. I wish there was something out there that worked as well as the Specialized but didn't break. It will be a week before I get my new swing arm. In the last year, I have missed at least a month of riding time due to breakage. But I have probably made that up by riding more often and longer when the bike is working. Don't even think about buying a used FSR; you will definitely need the warranty. Two turds for reliability, averaged with five for performance, gives arating of three and a half turds.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
C. W. Rubright
a Cross Country Rider
from Charlotte, NC. USA Date Reviewed: May 25, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Catawba Riverfront Park
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Light & quick singletrack racer. Lot of fun for the money.
Weaknesses:
Pretty much all of the in house componets. BB, hubs, crankset and the Manitou SX fork rebound damping knob froze up, even after being rebuilt.
Similar Products Used:
Tested Gary Fisher F3
Bike Setup:
CT-2 Flat bar,XTR tapered BB, XT brake calipers, PanaracerXC Pro tires, Thompson Elite seatpost, Flite TI Gel Saddle, 2000 upgraded wheelset from S factory due to junk hubs from factory. Control tech stubby bar-ends, Salsa grips and Salsa QR seat collar/lever.
Bottom Line:
I would still buy the bike again all problems aside. For such a good frame and suspension design, everything else can slowly be changed. Specialized has been good about standing behind the bike such as with the new wheelset. However, even though I like the ride quality of the Manitou SX, it had to be rebuilt due to bottoming out on jumps as well as for the rebound damping knob that has froze up twice now. Not impressed overall with Manitou. As far as the bike, it has done everything I have asked of it and highly recommend it for anyone from weekend warrior to racer.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Simon Connell
a Cross Country Rider
from United Kingdom Date Reviewed: May 17, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Ones with dirt on them :-)
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Where to start? i have had mine for 18 months now, and it still puts a smile on my face every time I ride it. It accelerates likea beast, climbs like a demon, and rails singletrack like nothing else. I was put in a position to replace it the other day, but even if it got stolen I would just buy a new one. It handles impeccably, and is a better bike than I will ever be a rider. Specialized customer service is a bit slow, but very good.
Weaknesses:
Unfortunatley there are plenty (All fixable): Pedals: these use SBC pontoons which are incompatible with most shoes. Bars: What do they think they are doing fitting a flat bar to this bike? Fit a riser and watch it come alive! Forks: I am not the only one who has had the paint peeling off the forks, replaced under warranty though. Cranks: These are very flexy, no wonder they were replaced for y2k. The old ones were bad, 4-arm just made them worse. Wheels: These are fine until you come to upgrade, but when I fitted a new pair it made an amazing diffeence. Also, SBC are arrogant enough to fit hubs that are not designed to be serviced :-(
Similar Products Used:
Plenty ridden when looking for a new bike, long term Rockhopper before that.
Bike Setup:
Scott Octane Pro risers, XTR chainset/f.mech/BB, black lower legs on forks, Bontrager Racelight wheelset, Flite saddle, DMR V12 pedals, Salsa dual ply grips.
Bottom Line:
A great bike, which could do with a bit of fettling out of the box, fit risers and new pedals in the shop, then upgrade the wheels and cranks over time. This bike is versitile enough to be set up as anything from a slalom bike (I have seen it done) to a full-on XC racers bike. Buy one and learn why.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Glen Marchand
a Cross Country Rider
from Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Date Reviewed: May 10, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Multiple Orgazm
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Frame. Component spec (shimano xt-xtr). Front suspension is sweet, Climbs like a rocket from the crypt. And of course price 1800$ Cdn. Nothing else was close in this respect.
Weaknesses:
Stock pedals, (Which I changed for my venerable 535's). I thought my headset was out after 15hrs of riding, but found out on closer inspection that there was some play in the rear suspension bushing. After reading some reviews here, it turns out that it is a common occurance. Called my shop, they said they are going to warranty it (we'll see). Been a month now and still waiting. (Someone is dropping the ball when it comes to shipping parts, my shop or the big S) Also the price for them is around 50$ Cdn !?!?, they are bushings, not gold cock rings!! Also bent my Mavic 221's, but going to attribute that to settling in pains. Noticed ghost shifts on the chainrings, chain drops to granny from middle for no reason. Maybe a small adjustment needed?
Similar Products Used:
Had A Fisher HooKooEKoo (4 yrs- bullet proof). Tested Santa Cruz Superlight, Heckler, Older model Fsr's. Many more..
Bike Setup:
Amoeba riser bar, Bontrager stem, 535 pedals replace specialized units, replaced seat post clamp, wanted one that you can change on the fly. More to come!! But so far so good.
Bottom Line:
All right. Like the bike! Climbs like stink. I wasn't a big fan of Specialized, but the price was right and I've only heard raves, with minor mods needed looked into. I am planning on racing XC, and weekend blow out's. I have only hammered on muddy trails, with technical goodies thrown in (wet roots & rocks) and not bad so far.I am looking to beating it up a fair bit at Bromont, and then we will see how it holds up. I am using my old steel hardtail (G.F.HooKoo) as a bench mark here. But I can say that dual suspension is where it's at. Easier on the body, easier to ride. The riser bars are a vast improvement over straights, and I like the 9 spd, (So far). Got a cover for the rear shock, to keep the slugde out. Covered the rear right swing arm with an old tube and some zip tie's to protect the chain. Going to change rings, bb, and cranks to Race Face when I blow these unit's up. All in all I am impresed. Who should buy: Person looking for the most bang for the buck. Go out and buy one, and with the money you save, buy beer!!!!!!! Yahoo!!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Edgardo Cruz
a Weekend Warrior
from Santiago, CHILE Date Reviewed: May 9, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Huinganal - Scl
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Very light and agile. Excellent for cross country, specilly when the trail has a lot of up's and down's. The best value for it's price. Good and reliable components..except for the cranks..too noisy. Front suspension (Manitou SX) is acceptable, even in the catalog the manufacturer specified a SXR model.
Weaknesses:
Cranks The rear suspension link to the frame is loose and makes noise...needs improved linkage
Similar Products Used:
ProFlex Beast 98
Bike Setup:
XTR break levers
Bottom Line:
I will change this bike, when similar type or model comes with disk brakes. By the time I am very happy with it's performance....and whenever I have to jump or lift the bike over a fence with the bike, as it is feather weight, compared to the ones I had before. People who loves to enjoy cross country, not being a Superman biker (I am 49 years old), will be very happy with the Stumpjumper.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Brian
a Racer
from Orlando,Fl Date Reviewed: March 26, 2000
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Comfortable ride,fast
Weaknesses:
Company Customer Service Sucks.....my frame broke into two pieces and they wouldn't warranty it
Similar Products Used:
many during the buying process
Bike Setup:
Marzocchi Z-2 Bam( awesome fork), King headset and hubs, mavic Rims XTR derailleurs, KORE stem
Bottom Line:
Bottom line is I fell in love with this bike and 4 people I know bought the exact same bike as mine after riding mine and going on my reccomendation. My frame snapped into two pieces, causing me to take a nasty crash at 24 mph during the last race of the season. I had won everyone up until this time, this was the 8th race I had ridden this bike in. The Specialized rep was a jerk and would not get my bike warrantied, would not even offer a crash replacement that I offered to pay for. Bike is great until it breaks, then company abandons you and won't help. My advice is stay away from this company.....buy a bike from a company that will stand behind their products and offer good customer service
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jim P
a Cross Country Rider
from Indialantic, Florida. Date Reviewed: March 23, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Bum trails
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
1999 FSR XC comp Great ride, suspension works well when dialed in, nimble and quick in the trails.
Weaknesses:
1)No rear shock pump included 2)Specialized wheel set(hubs) 3)Shock/rear triangle bushings 4)Prolong saddle(ouch) 5)Rear brake cabling(cable can hit you leg/foot when peddling)
Similar Products Used:
To many to list
Bike Setup:
Upgraded the following: 1)XTR shifter/brakes 2)XT cranks 3)Easton ct2 bars 4)Yeti grips/control tech bar ends 5)Manitou carbon fork
Bottom Line:
After over a year on it I have been pretty happy with the bike. The ride is great, maintenance has been minimal.
A rear shock boot is a must were I ride. Dirt was constantly getting into the shock seals and causing air leaks. The rear hub gave out after about 2-3 months. (I think the axle was to tight on the bearings from the factory). Ditch the Prolong saddle if you ever want to have kids. I have had to replace to rear triangle/shock bushings twice now (which I am not happy about). Has anybody else had this problem? I heard there are after market bushings or bearings available to replace them but I haven’t found them yet. If anybody knows where I can get them please let me know. Overall I have been happy with the bike, but a few small annoyances can really knock a few chilies off. I’ll give it 3 1/2
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jim Matthews
a Cross Country Rider
from San Antonio, TX , USA Date Reviewed: January 27, 2000
Favorite Trail:
Kokopelli Trail-Utah
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Light frame weight for full suspension. Great rear shock. Overall frame dimensions are good for a 17 inch frame. Frame paint quality is good.
Weaknesses:
Cranks are weak. Front shock could not be tweaked to fit my riding style. Tire not suitable for my local riding area. Stem too short. Would like to replace the allen bolt seat post clamp with new Specialized QR seat post clamp which is now available on the 2000 Stumpjumpers FSR's, but not available at this time as aftermarket part according to my local bike shop.
Similar Products Used:
Moots YBBeat Gary Fisher Joshua F1 KHS Team Softail Giant XtC DS1
Bike Setup:
Upgrades since purchase include: Ritchey pro-lite stem 135mm,Race Face cranks/chain rings,Race Face bottom bracket, Manitou SX-ti front suspension fork, Dean seat post, with WTB SST ti/kevlar saddle,Nuke Proof 2000 Atom Bomb hubs with Sun 0 degree rims & Specialized Team Control/Master tires. Chris King head set-silver is a must for this bike.
Bottom Line:
Bike now weight 25 lbs. due to upgrades, which includes a small seat pack and a Specialized Comp computer. Great ride, especially thru rocky/loose dirt areas common in my local riding area. I usually ride in the afternoon and hate to see the sun head for the horizon, cause I finally have a bike I really like to ride. I am an older rider and the full suspension bike has greatly reduced my back pain. Older riders (over 50) this is the bike to try. Can't believe I waited so long to purchase a full suspension rig, and I definitely found the right one for me. Will probably change out the pedals for Shimano M747's in the future, but spec'd pedals have been great. Would like to replace Fox Vanilla Float with the Fox Float RC, but can't justify the extra expense. Incidentally, my wife also bought the same bike and she won't even talk about riding a hardtail again.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
nate
a Cross-Country Rider
from utah Date Reviewed: January 1, 2000
Favorite Trail:
anything
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
price design XT XTR
Weaknesses:
crank stem too high
Similar Products Used:
every thing Hard decision between this and a Diamondbadk XR1
Bike Setup:
factory
Bottom Line:
I just go this bike from supergo. I only paid 1050 for it, I drove from salt lake city to california in 2 days to buy it. It was worth it. I havent realy gone for a mountain bike ride on it yet, I have only owned it for 2 days. I is a great upgrade from my schwinn mesa LE. The crank may suck I cant tell yet but the wheels are very lite and work good. so far five flaming piles for this bike.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Brian Crabtree
a Cross-Country Rider
from Whiteland IN Date Reviewed: December 30, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Gnawbone Camp
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Weight, climbing ability
Weaknesses:
Cranks, front de-railer
Similar Products Used:
first full suspension
Bike Setup:
I changed every thing but the frame,fork,rear de-rail.
Bottom Line:
I took all the compenents off this bike with exception of the fork and frame and cranks. I will be getting rid of the cranks as soon as possible. I have to run 220 lbs in the rear shock to not get power Zapped. (I am 5'11, 185lbs) This bike climbs great with air in the rear shock, with out the proper air it will zap your power. My bike weighs in at 23.5lbs. But to get there I had to change everything. Grip shift and 8 spd XT components. Over all I am happy I didnt spend the extra money for the M4.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jason
a Racer
from East Peoria, IL Date Reviewed: December 19, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Jubilee College State Park Plank Trail
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Out of box lightness(25.5lbs.) component spec. for the money
Weaknesses:
So far none.
Similar Products Used:
I have a Kona Ku hardtail, but this is my first full suspension.
Bike Setup:
Traded parts from my hardtail to the FSR and vice versa: Headset for Cane Creek Fork for White SC72ul Stem for Kore Elite Bar for Bontrager Crow bar race Rear der./shifters for Sram 9.0 9 spd.
Bottom Line:
This review is on the 2000 FSR XC Comp, which is team red and with the improved(?) Specialized crankset. I swapped alot of the parts because I have had them on my hardtail and know they perform and last. I bought this bike aware of some of the quality issues concerning Specialized in-house components,my friend bought the 1999 FSR XC Pro and had to replace the crankset in about 8 weeks, but of the limited rides I have taken I can say this. The cranks/rings do seem to be of better build quality, but only time will tell. Swapping the stem/bar made the biggest change in overall handling for me. Stock the cockpit just felt too cramped. Going to a Kore Elite 135mm 10deg. rise stem and Bontrager 1.5 inch riser bar made the bike feel much better. The Manitou Mars is really plush, but being a first generation product and having owned Manitou product before, I kept the oh-so-sweet White Bros. up front. After picking up the bike I immediately went for a ride. In just the 45 minutes I was out the rear rim already is out of true. It is a Mavic 225, which seems to be OEM similar to the 221. I put my 217CD wheelset on but have to wonder about the longevity of the factory rims. Again, this bike is very new and does not have alot of miles. But straight out of the box, to weigh 25.5 honest and the components built into the bike, the price of this bike makes it a steal!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Phil
a Cross-Country Rider
from San Juan, PR Date Reviewed: December 10, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Guajataca Forest
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Aggressive steering, light weight, good climbing for full suspension
Weaknesses:
Manitou SX, Specialized crank
Similar Products Used:
Schwinn Homegrown
Bike Setup:
XT/XTR, SID
Bottom Line:
If you upgrade to float RC and a SID up front (not to mention getting rid of specialized crank) you got a hell of a weapon
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Rob
a Weekend Warrior
from NC Date Reviewed: November 25, 1999
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Light, components, lots of bike for the $$$
Weaknesses:
the specialized crank, no bar ends
Similar Products Used:
stumpjumper FSR XC haro ex1 klein mantra
Bike Setup:
i switched off the specialized crank and put a XT on, also put TITEC bar ends on.
Bottom Line:
GREAT BIKE !!!!! PERIOD
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Antony Mills
a Cross-Country Rider
from Stourbridge (England) Date Reviewed: November 10, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Coed-Y-Brenin, Wales.
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Light, tight, and absolutely outa site!
Weaknesses:
A couple of rear shock probs and a new rear hub & freewheel inside 3 months.
Similar Products Used:
Marin Mount Vision Scott G-Zero
Bike Setup:
Standard UK set up. Enduro 27 riser bars. XT V Brakes.
Bottom Line:
After owning three Scott bikes and seriously sussing out the other options for £1,500, I bought this bike in March 99 and apart from a couple of problems it is has been absolutely brilliant.When I bought it I kept my Scott Expert Racing hard tail for winter riding (The UK winter weather is very damp and muddy) but I think I will be staying on the FSRXC comp right thru to April.The problems with the Fox rear shock leaking air was dealt with well by the UK distributor and the shop (Bucks Cylces, High Wycombe) have been totally committed to getting me a top notch set up and sorting out a rear hub glitch.I got the riser bars from the Enduro FSR, put on the bike FOC at day one and I just cant stop riding it.What a bike....
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
adam
a Cross-Country Rider
from state college pa Date Reviewed: November 5, 1999
Favorite Trail:
tussey Mountain trai
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
light, good suspension, good price for lightweight full suspension (I got mine for $1400 on sale
Weaknesses:
tires suck ass cranks are way too flexy
Similar Products Used:
kona something cannondale super v specialized fsr trek y bike schwinn sweet spot
Bike Setup:
about 125 psi in the rear ( for 145 lb. rider) and pre load all the way out on the fork for a plush ride. All components are stock, but I plan to change the tires and cranks eventually.
Bottom Line:
This is a great all around xc bike. The tires suck, and make downhills scary because you never know what they are going to do. The crank flexes causing the chain to rub the front deraleure. Everything else is great. The suspension really helps on the climbs, and it's lighter than my old hardtail. Three inches isn't a lot of travel, but if you ride the bike like a hardtail on the downhills you will be fine. Overall this is the best mountain bike I have ever ridden, except maybe the cannondale super v raven, with the lefty fork, but that's more of a freeride bike, and twice as expensive.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
TJW
a Racer
from Mpls, MN Date Reviewed: October 21, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Many
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
See 5/7, 7/14 reviews
Weaknesses:
see 5/7, 7/14 reviews
Bottom Line:
2000 mile plus update - Best upgrades/review 1. Stiffened front shock - took the all the pogo out of the ride. I now run less air in the rear - 135 psi. I'm a 150 lbs. rider. The results are great. Smooth absorbsion out of front and rear shock with little loss of energy. 2. Stem - I first went with a 135 0 rise stem to help offset the short top tube. I liked the feel, but technical, root/rock/rut downhills became too exciting with too much weight on the front tire. A few suprise endo's made me change to a 120 10. The position is more upright than I'm used to, but the bike now is truely point and shoot. 3. Drive Train - The strong arm 4 arm crank was much more flexible than the previous 5 arm version. The BB was at best LX quality. I took the plunge and xtr'ed the crank, bb, chain and cassette. Wow! The bike felt like it was a gear higher and a mile an hour faster in all situations. The improved stiffness made a huge difference in the feel of the bike. This was an expensive upgrade, but I was suprised at the significance of the improvement. Overall, the bike has taken a lot more experimentation and upgrading than my previous rides. The only major downside is still in frame size, which I feel reasonably dialed into. The overall performance rates amoung the best I've rode. I have pushed the bike hard over a variety of terrain and a large number of miles. Nothing has broken as reflected in other reviews. The upgrades have only made a solid ride into a great ride. I would purchase this bike again.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Stuart
a Cross-Country Rider
from Aliso Viejo Date Reviewed: October 19, 1999
Favorite Trail:
downieville DH
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Light bike for full suspension. Awesome Climber. Fast on downhills.
Weaknesses:
Everyone else has one. chain rings bent, had to change stem and bars for more comfortable set-up. front shock is weak. tires are weak.
Bike Setup:
hard tail trek.
Bottom Line:
a nice bike, but i had to change too many parts on it. the manitou fork sucks. i went to put a fatter tire on the front and had to modify the fork to keep it from bottoming out. the 2000 version has most of the problems worked out. After spending a couple hunderd on extra parts it is a really nice bike.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
dave montgomery
a Cross-Country Rider
from abilene texas usa Date Reviewed: October 13, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Local: San Angelo S.P.
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Strengths:
Light, Great down hill performance for a XC bike, Handles like a champ. Good climber. Tires are fast on hard packed trails
Weaknesses:
Tires are squirrelly in loose stuff. Many of the Specialized components have to be replaced
Similar Products Used:
DBR Vertex WCF Trek 950
Bike Setup:
Standard mostly with added barends, and new bottom bracket(real) and pedals(shimano)
Bottom Line:
This is the best bike I've ever owned and its a joy to ride. It is so much more comfortable than a hardtail that all your performance will increase or at least stay the same. I,d suggest changing out a few components even before you take it out of the store, like the pedals, the bottom braket and maybe the chain rings if you can afford to.You'll have to buy a air pump for the rear shock. Im 180 lbs and run 150psi. i love this bike I give it 4 Jalepenos and one bell pepper (for the crappy Specialized components)
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Joe
a Weekend Warrior
from Runnemede, NJ Date Reviewed: September 23, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Wissahickon
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Frame, Fork, Shock and most of the components
Weaknesses:
Crank and Chainrings (the chainrings don't shift well when clean, good luck getting them to work at all when muddy). I didn't realize how much flex there was in the stock crank until I used the RaceFace Crank.
Similar Products Used:
Very few. I was sold after the first test ride.
Bike Setup:
Upgrades to stock bike made at purchase: XTR-V-Brakes and Levers, Time ATAC Pedals, S-Works Wheelset, Velociraptor 2.1's. Upgrade after 5 months: RaceFace Turbine LP Crankset
Bottom Line:
With the upgrades made at purchase, the bike rode like a dream EXCEPT for the chainrings! With the new crankset and all the upgrades this bike is sweet. It's excellent for the trails we ride (Eastern PA, DE, MD - technical, rocky, mostly singletrack). It climbs like a hardtail and descends under control and with comfort. Thanks to the gang at Action Wheels in NJ for hooking me up with such a great ride. I can't speak for the stock bike but my upgraded version gets all five stars.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Matt
a Weekend Warrior
from Victoria, BC Date Reviewed: September 21, 1999
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
After a few choice changes, pretty much everything!
Weaknesses:
just the fact that the pedals have a disconcerting tendency to graze anything sticking out of the ground (rocks, roots, chipmunks).
Similar Products Used:
Pro-Flex 856 (2 years) Pro-Flex Animal with Stratos air shock (1 yr) Kona Hei Hei (1 ride)
Bike Setup:
Not quite stock: Hayes front disc XTR rear V-Brake + lever Fire Xc pro rear tire Tioga factory downhill front tire Titec Berserkr saddle (a must!) Riser Bar Z2 Bombers (85mm) Mavic 217 ceramic rim on back
Bottom Line:
Well... This is THE nicest bike I've ever ridden (sorry Ti guys). With the Bombers on the front, this bike came alive and kept me that way too, I might add. It is simply the best-balanced, best-performing (can you tell I like my bike???). Some Magura Hydraulics for the back and Race Face (Oh, Canada!) cranks are about al that Santa could ever bring to improve it, but I sure ain't complaining. It's light, responsive, very supple and just plain fun, which is what counts most. And so far it has held up well on our vicious BC trails. If you're thinking about one of these babies, it really only needs three changes: 1) New saddle!!! (if you value your posterior at all) I highly recommend the Berserkr. 2)New tires (whatever works where you be) 3)Bombers Bombers Bombers! ( OK, that's a personal bias, but let's face it, they work beautifully and need maintenance oh, say once a year. Can't beat that. Besides, the Manitous, just don't match up all that well to the Fox...)But overall, damn fine bike!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Dunzie
a Cross-Country Rider
from Guelph, Ontario, Canada Date Reviewed: September 21, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Guelph Lake
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Great overall feel. Lightweight and responsive. Well-suited to almost any type of ride.
Weaknesses:
Bike needs more regular maintenance and tweaking than many others...
Similar Products Used:
Marin Rift Zone Gary Fisher Joshua F3 Rocky Mtn. Element Schwinn 4-Banger GT XCR2000
Bike Setup:
Marzocchi Z1 Dropoff SDG Comp saddle Shimano 636DH clips Maguras Hydraulic Brakes Race Face LP crank, rings Easton MonkeyLite bars Panaracer XC Pro K kevlar tires (2.10)
Bottom Line:
This is an update to my last review... I've since put a couple hundred miles onto the bike and have a better feel for its strengths... When dialed in properly, I can't picture a better all-around XC bike. The rear end works EXTREMELY well for anything short of 10' drop offs. I already knew the Z1 Bomber was fantastic. The bike climbs so much easier than a hardtail it's silly. Just the way the bike handles through fast switchbacks, different terrain, slow tight stuff, it doesn't matter, the bike RIPS. BUT... it does take a little more care to dial things in right. I've had to adjust my derailleurs several times, excessive even for normal cable stretch during breakin. A couple times I had to walk the bike up long hills back to the main trail because no matter how much I fiddled, the thing swapped between gears. Now the cables have fully stretched, and things seem settled, and riding is perfect again. This bike, with my upgrades, checks in at 28 pounds - not sure where I gained 3.5 pounds, most likely in the fork, the hydraulics, and the tires (2.10's). I run the shock at 195psi and it gives me the best combination of supple and responsive. (I'm a hair over 6' tall, 200 pounds.) No question about it, this bike makes me faster EVERYWHERE on my trails, and the BEST thing is that it conserves my energy like I never thought possible. The truth is, unless you ride paved or smooth hard-packed trails, a hardtail will beat you up and rob your endurance like you will not understand until you try a true high-end XC full suspender. I'm hooked, and riding is WAY FUN again... Just a note on my upgrades - went with 2.10 tires to get a little more aggressive grip, the SDG saddle is amazing, and there's no better brake system for control and feel than the Maguras. Overall, I have upped the price of the bike (as well as the weight), but the ride is definitely worth it. Once again, thanks to the BEST BIKE SHOP ANYWHERE - BICYCLE WORKS, WATERDOWN. WAY WORTH THE DRIVE EVERY TIME...
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Greg
a Cross-Country Rider
from New Jersey Date Reviewed: September 19, 1999
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Bike is pretty light for a full suspension. Great ride.
Weaknesses:
Tires, Bottom Bracket, Seat, Rims and Seat Post.
Similar Products Used:
First full suspension ride.
Bike Setup:
WTB seat, Thomson seat post, Race Face bottom bracket, Geax tires, Gripshift shifters and brake levers, Oury grips and XT casette.
Bottom Line:
This is not only my first full suspension bike but my last ride was an entry level Trek so it is also my first quality bike. I changed alot on the bike, half of which my LBS did at no charge. I also flippeed the stem over (stock set up was too upright). I have rideen 150 miles on this bike. This bike is a HUGE step up over my last bike. This is not a downhill bike. This is definitely a cross country bike. It is a great ride!!!! I love this bike. Once I got used to the dual suspension I haven't noticed any loss due to pedal strokes. This bike EATS up steep, rocky, rooty technical climbs. I am never sore after riding. It weighs less than my hardtail (25 1/2 lbs). I did alot of research before buying. Test ride this bike and you will buy it.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Michael Reinhardt
a Weekend Warrior
from Plymouth,MN Date Reviewed: September 17, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Minnesota Valley
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Good rear suspension with Vanilla Fox and solid frame. Shifters and brakes are precise and tight. Good value for the price $1500. Lightweight.
Weaknesses:
Lot's of re-adjustment necessary with front derailluer. Pedals are sticky. Bottom drillings for water bottle are stripped. Dealer says it maybe a warranty issue. I've come to the conclusion that the stock tires are suboptimal for serious off road work.I also hate the fact that the crank is not the standard bolt pattern. Will probably upgrade next year to Race Face Next LP crank and rings.
Similar Products Used:
Various Cannondale Super v 800, 900, etc.
Bike Setup:
Stock set-up with exception of LP Composite riser bar and bar ends, Koobi Split seat. Make's the bike much more comfortable to ride XC.
Bottom Line:
Overall a good ride and I would recommed it to anyone looking for a FS XC bike in the $1500 catagory
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jim
a Cross-Country Rider
from Seattle, WA Date Reviewed: September 16, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Devil's Gulch
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Fast and smooth
Weaknesses:
The front shock seemed to be very stiff, even after adjustments. It's getting smoother, so it might be the break-in period others have mentioned.
Bottom Line:
I had been riding a '94 rockhopper with toe clips and no shocks. When I moved to Seattle my new friends took me on some hard core trails, including one with a long climb and rocky/rooty downhill that destroyed me. I knew a new bike was in order. After a lot of research I settled on the FSR XC line. LBS had the Comp for $1957 incl. tax so I sent e-mails to bike stores on the web. The Bike Shop in Canada came through at $1350US + $100 shipping and won my business. I cut the seat down and was good to go. Most importantly: The Ride. This bike rocks! It was so much lighter and faster than my old bike it's not funny. It climbs great, shifts smoothly, and soaks up the bumps with ease. The brakes are very good and saved me from a road wipe out this weekend. Like others say, the tires are a bit jittery so I may try new ones down the line. Bottom line: I did that original trail again this morning and was a changed man. Point the bike and it goes where you want it. Five stars.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jonathan
a Cross-Country Rider
from New Hampshire Date Reviewed: September 15, 1999
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Light,responsive,I'm @150lbs on a good day and the fork works well.. needed the after market stiff kit.Great over roots,rocks,junk at speed.Rear end doesn't pivot or flex. strong
Weaknesses:
crank set made of tin, lost a few teeth early on. Can bottom out on the pedals pretty easy. Tires are great for a road ride.
Similar Products Used:
Trek y22 Klein Mantra
Bike Setup:
Stock except for a Kore stem,jumbo lizard skins chain guard, titec handle bars/enders,mythos tires,xt crank
Bottom Line:
Good bike outta the box, great with a few minor tweeks, great value for the buck vs. the competition.Sure as hell beats my old Trek 950!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
bruce
a Cross-Country Rider
from oakland ca. Date Reviewed: September 11, 1999
Favorite Trail:
northside mt. tam
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Bike Setup:
flite saddle team master and team control tires fork travel conversion to 80mm
Bottom Line:
this is an update of a earlier review. since then ive ditched the oem tires, thier lack of traction, braking and cornering were appalling. they cost me 9 stitches in my calf. the move to 80mm in the fork is a snap, just ask Answer for directions( all thier forks in 2000 will be 80mm same with the FSR XC line). the only remaining problem i have is getting the seat post lower with out grinding the stop out and voiding my warranty. I'm also waiting for mountain speed to put out a spring kit for this fork.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Shawn
a Cross-Country Rider
from Guelph, Ontario, Canada Date Reviewed: September 10, 1999
I had the Marin for a while and liked it, but this bike is lighter and faster everywhere except on a downhill (still VERY close). I did a lot of research on this purchase and I believe I have corrected any potential problems (ie/ bb, pedals, brakes) by upgrading a few parts. Now, the bike scales WAY better in the real world than any hardtail, handles real quick and yet is very stable, and still has enough suspension to handle the harder downhill stuff with ease. It's the perfect combination for me for cross-country riding, and it's even better than the Marin at saving your energy in a day's riding, and I gotta say it looks pretty darn trick too. I'd say it's as close as you will find to the PERFECT cross-country weapon. Gotta give a big THANKS to BICYCLE WORKS (best shop around, no question) in Waterdown, Ontario, and to SPECIALIZED CANADA for finding me this beauty so late in the season!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
james
a Cross-Country Rider
from atlanta ga Date Reviewed: September 3, 1999
Favorite Trail:
mountaintown creek
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
suspension design comfort performance for $
Weaknesses:
tires - work well on pavement only Chainrings and crank seat pedals
Bike Setup:
185 psi (for 215 lb) xvert springs in manitou
Bottom Line:
Suspension works well for XC use. Very comfortable. I am faster on downhills and rooty or rocky uphills. Only negative suspension effects occur when I stand on climbs, I can feel the bobbing. Back end flexes a bit on corners, but not terribly. Bottom bracket is quite low, easy to crab pedals on rocks. I am 6'3 215lb and run 185 psi in rear shock. X-Large was barely big enough. The top tube is a little short, but I got used to the more upright position. After 500 miles I had to overhaul the pivots (except the main). (I got caught in a rainstorm and had to ride 1 hours through clay and sand.)Overhauling pivots to 1/2 hour. Chainrings are terrible, and the little ring is not standard Shimano 4 bolt pattern. Pedals are terrible. Cannot get out ever! Overall I would reccomend the bike to anyone. Good bang for the buck.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Sid
a Cross-Country Rider
from Leicester, UK Date Reviewed: August 27, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Wensleydale
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Climbs like Mountaingoat on Speed, eats trails This bike climbs as well as the Mount Vision for 3/4 of the price (£1250), and tracks better. Downhill the Mt Vision was more comfy, but after 9 years riding hardtails who cares?
Weaknesses:
Crank cunningly forged from marzipan,The front chainrings are really flexible and rub on the derailleur when you put real power down. mega 9 hates grass and gives up when it smells mud. As mentioned by just about everyone, it is annoying having to buy a shock pump, and you will need one, but i'd prefer to the pay £27 and have a much stiffer ride than roll around on a marshmallow. This bike begs to climb in the saddle so it was strange that the saddle is made of cast iron and wood.
Similar Products Used:
Marin Pine Mountain Kona Kilauea Marin Mount Vision (4 day test)
Bike Setup:
Stock set up, replaced stem with Azonic and Changed tubes for Air-B's (stock tubes punctured on first ride - lose 'em!)
Bottom Line:
Perfect for a first full susser, handles like a BMX climbs like a rocket, looks stunning, which is nice!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jubbi
a Cross-Country Rider
from usa Date Reviewed: August 10, 1999
Favorite Trail:
tech trails
Duration Product Used:
tested or demo'ed only
Strengths:
Good bike, good company
Weaknesses:
bad price
Similar Products Used:
Many full susp (k2, trek, schwinn, klein, cannondale, santa cruz--they're all mostly crap, except K2/Proflex)
Bottom Line:
Specialized makes good frames. They put together good bikes, and they have great engineering, but not as good as others in better price ranges.Other than the K2 line, the FSR is the only other general consumer dual susp I would possibly buy. But it would have to be on a closeout--and here is the complaint. When do you ever see specialized really have good closeout prices on less than 2 year old bikes? The FSR rear design is okay, but it has more link points than it needs. The shocks are good, but not as good as the smart shock by K2/Noleen. OEM Components are good, specialized made components need to get lost.Three chilies for a good dual susp, minus one for expense.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
TJW
a Cross-Country Rider
from Mpls, MN Date Reviewed: July 14, 1999
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
See May 9 review
Weaknesses:
See May 9 review
Bike Setup:
1. Stem - KORE 3D lite zero rise 130mm. I like the lower, more streched out position - decades of road biking! 2. Saddle - WTB kevlar. Great saddle. The Prolong lacked contour and comfort. 3. Pedals - traded at the LBS for 747's. The Specialized units would not adjust even for the test ride. 4. Tires - Put new 1997 Team M/C teams. Better climbing, braking and are more stable at speed than the Dirts on this bike. I moved the Dirts to my M2 - they are great with the stiff frame. All other stock components have worked as expected.
Bottom Line:
1st 1000 miles - After riding hardtails cross country for the last 15 years, I expected that it would take a while to dial into a FS bike. The FS bike by design is going to steal some of your pedaling energy to compress the front and rear springs and will release that energy when the pedal torque is released - even with excellent pedaling style. Thats lost energy. Regardless of the hype regarding the efficient design of FS bikes, this energy loss is noticed. The trick is to leave the springs loose enough to provide suspension tractabilty and yet stiff enough to be responsive within your riding style. For my XC riding - average 15 mph on hilly midwestern trails - I wanted to cancel out suspension feedback while climbing and in sprints while still having the suspension take out the harshness of small and medium bumps. For my style, the optimum bike set up is stiff. I am 150 lbs. The rear Fox is set at 140-145 psi depending on riding with or without a camelback. The front sx was plush at first, and became soft over time. I have left the rebound damping off. I set the compression damping in the internal left leg at a turn and a half - halfway - and the external compression ajustment at a full four turns, but still had a lot of feedback under most torque conditions. I reset the stack with a yellow-red-yellow elatomer combination - very easy to do by simply removing the right leg top. This canceled out feedback and still provides excellent suspension. After 1000 miles of riding, I have found that the dialed in Comp is an excellent bike for XC riding and racing. It's more complex than a hardtail and will require a little more routine work. I feel the ride is worth it.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Pat
a Cross-Country Rider
from BC Date Reviewed: July 2, 1999
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
shifting,breaking light enough,looks, handling
Weaknesses:
saddle,rings,tires
Similar Products Used:
lots of hardtails
Bike Setup:
stock
Bottom Line:
After 4 hard months, this bike is what I had been looking for : agile ,quick ,good climber and descender,still looks like a bike,approx. 26 lbs, with just enough travel. The Manitou sx is great, the fox rear was replaced once and the saddle(hard)and the tires(skiterish)will be replaced soon.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
bk
a Cross-Country Rider
from amesbury, ma Date Reviewed: June 17, 1999
Favorite Trail:
fells medford ma
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
best full suspension mountain bike in the price class (or even above its price class). great components, nice'n'light, xtr shifts great, fs makes it climb and decend rocky terrain and keeps the wheels on the ground where they should be
Weaknesses:
its not a downhill bike and all the extra travel and cushyness is weight and hinders performance (climbing and technical singletrack). rear chainrings were lx and i folded them in 2 rides, upgraded to xt things are good again. front derail. gets out of adjustment often (probably break in still) i have about 150 or so miles so far. tires are not too great, but its an easy upgrade. pedals are getting sticky and i keep my bike clean and lubed. all in all a great xc bike
Similar Products Used:
trek y's klein mantra hard to find another bike with the components for the price
Bike Setup:
rear shock at 220psi front set stiff with upgraded bushings (stock are too soft and bouncy for 180 lbs person)
Bottom Line:
coming from a hardtail stump, no comparison. this is faster, tighter, better than it. my friend bought an $1800 hardtail that doesnt even compare. mountain bike magazine november 98 page 80 has a great article on the evolution and the goals of specialized for this bike. pretty cool info. i am sold
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jon Mitchell
a Cross-Country Rider
from Hampshire, UK Date Reviewed: June 8, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Red Bull, North Wales
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Relatively Lightweight Good Tyres Good riding position Excellent componentry Looks fantastic Nice forks Lovely climber
Weaknesses:
No air pump at this price!!!! Aheadset went after 1 week...shop tells me this is a common problem Forks take 20hrs to wear in 9 speed very susceptible to adjustment Not enough suss for 'real downhills'
Similar Products Used:
GT Zaskar LE (1st Bike) Mount Vision (2nd bike)
Bike Setup:
Rear shock run at 125 psi Forks preload off completely Damping 50% Tyres at 40psi (slightly damp conditions)
Bottom Line:
A superb full suss XC racer, lightweight with excellent componentry and a good 'thrashing' position. If you love the ultra fast, rocky downhills this isn't the bike for you though...go for something with a bit more travel and probably a coil over rear shock. However, for the very technical downhill singletrack, you really can't beat this bike. A shame the Aheadset bearings went after one week, a common prob according to the shop....however they did replace them immediately. If you are looking for a XC racer want the full suss option, I'd choose this over a Mount Vision or similar, however if you try and squeeze a downhill bike out of a XC one, look elsewhere (just not enough travel for 'that' sort of riding).
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jeff
a Cross-Country Rider
from Grand Blanc, MI Date Reviewed: June 5, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Pontiac Lake, MI
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
First, I'm 52 years old, 6 ft tall, 180 lbs, ride 3-4 times per week. I ordered the large (19 ) and it fits great. The bike is light weight, climbs and accelerates better than most hardtails I've ridden, very quick in tight single-track, very stable over rocks, roots, & logs. The full suspension has saved my back, without being soft or mushy. No feedback, even when climbing out of the saddle. Set the air in the rear shock with the same psi as your body weight and go from there. The Manitou SX works very well, especially on descents. The brakes are outstanding, even when wet and muddy. The XTR rear derailluer has lived up to its great reputation. It shifts so well, it's easy to take it for granted. It really adds to the fun of riding this bike. Overall, everything on this bike seems to be well coordinated. I even like the mirror blue paint job, which I wasn't too impressed with when I saw it in the catalog, but it looks great in person. Good, no GREAT job, Specialized!
Weaknesses:
The seat is too hard, but I am getting used to it. I've got a Bontrager Race FS+10 ordered - now that is a comfortable seat! The pedals don't work very well at first, but are getting easier to release from as they get worn in.
Similar Products Used:
Trek Y22 & Y33
Bike Setup:
I upgraded the tires to the Team edition (Control and Master) and have been very pleased with them. With the full suspension, the tires can be run at 45-50 psi and still get a great ride and good traction, and avoid pinch flats.
Bottom Line:
Of all the bikes I've ridden (mostly hardtails), this bike is by far the most FUN (isn't that why we do this?) to ride and leaves me wanting to ride more when I used to be ready to go home. I'm riding faster and longer than I would've thought possible before getting this bike. It has all but totally eliminated lower back pain, which is one of the main reasons I got it. I find myself smiling alot before, during, and after my rides. It is a great buy for the money! Five stars also to the guys at Assenmacher's Cyclery in Grand Blanc for outstanding service after the sale.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Todd T.
a Cross-Country Rider
from Englewood Co. Date Reviewed: June 2, 1999
Favorite Trail:
CT Kenosha pass Buffalo Creek
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Handling in tight singletrack. Climbs loose with no traction problems. Light weight in comparison to other f/s designs.
Weaknesses:
Chain rings belong on a Huffy. No shock pump, Tires went south after two rides.
Can't beat this bike for an all day in the saddle, after you replace it, type of xc ride. It's a singletrack fool Great brakes. Turn in a dime with change leftover.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Bruce
a Cross-Country Rider
from Jensen Date Reviewed: May 26, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Hoo Koo E Koo
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Smoooth easy handling trail bike.Proven componentry I can depend on for years. Puts a smile on my face.
Weaknesses:
Rear tire locks and slides way to easily on loose hardpack.Not sure about coil/elastomer stacks progressive spring.Giving it a chance though
Similar Products Used:
zilch
Bike Setup:
M2 with future shock and XT 7 speed
Bottom Line:
Swopped bikes with my friend so he could see the suspension experience.His hardtail beat on me. I'm NEVER going back!This bike floats air, climbs(mega-9 baby),keeps me feeling fresh,and is everything I hoped it would be.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Richard
a Cross-Country Rider
from London Date Reviewed: May 25, 1999
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Lightweight Frame Supple not soggy rear suspension Lightweight parts Great Handling
Weaknesses:
Low quality chainrings - I've bent and snapped teeth on the middle one very quickly.I don't like the BB mounted front derailleur.Pedals can touch the ground as suspension bottoms out.I've been having trouble adjusting the front derailleur - I can only get the chain to drop to the small ring when I am in the lowerst 2-3 gears at the rear. Anyone else had this problem please e-mail me: richard@tidal.co.uk
Similar Products Used:
Marin, GT LTS, Cannondale Super-V, Trek Y.
Bike Setup:
Absolutely standard but swapped the grips and added a set of bar ends.
Bottom Line:
I love the handling and suspension- It really works well for long, tough rides. Now I've had the bike 6 months I can recommend it to anyone who's looking for a lightweight, active suspension bike. My only problems have been with the front derailleur and the chainrings.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Dennis
a Cross-Country Rider
from ann arbor michigan Date Reviewed: May 13, 1999
Favorite Trail:
poto
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Components,ride and handling
Weaknesses:
Pedals.lack of pump, grips, seat.
Similar Products Used:
Dbr-xr4, trek-vrx300,kline mantra,fisher joshua
Bottom Line:
My wife and I bought xc and comp, a big step from 930 trek and fisher aquila.Full suspension is great we'er almost learning to ride again.Pedals stiff at best,wife had a heck of a time since she was new to clipping in, LBS changed to times alium they are better for me but still hard for her.Bought shock pump from supergo 19$ did not come with bikeI think it should have.Tires were changed to Continental comp pro and cross countrys for the type conditions we ride .Trico power saddle great up grade.Xtr-xt-lx great components for the money,no other bike came close.Avids are great stopping power with out being overpowering.Grips were changed to Specialized high end don't know the name but nice.I have about 100 miles on my bike I am getting use to the suspension now but at first It was sooooooooo smooth compare to my other bike.Handling is great almost too good endoed yesterday hitting my ribs with handelbar,not the bikes fault but riders.Specialized has a winner with this line of bikes.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Lou
a Cross-Country Rider
from Sandy Hook ,Ct Date Reviewed: May 11, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Bethel res.
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Light wt, good gearing ,brisk shifting ,tracks well , cool color, tunable front& rear travel
Weaknesses:
price, tires, water bottle placement
Bottom Line:
An excellecnt cross-country rig.A big step upfrom my 95 rockhopper FS. I needed a large for my 5-9 ,170 bod. Medium was too cramped.With the 9 speeds ,no bar-lickin' climb is too steep. Dropped the front bar down two shims and replaced the front tire with velcoraptors to accomodate my style and trail conditions . I got it before they bumped up the price (18++ now)
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Brian
a Cross-Country Rider
from Nampa, Idaho Date Reviewed: May 7, 1999
Favorite Trail:
Bob's Trail
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Great handling bike, very quick and agile. I upgraded from a GT Avalanche LE
Weaknesses:
I hate the gunk that comes on the chain from the factory, takes a while to get the goup out of the chain. The only real problem was a couple of bolts cames loose in the first ride and my front brake pad fell off. (The bike shop was rather embarassed over the incident and retuned the bike for me) No problems since
Similar Products Used:
GT LTS, Trek Y
Bike Setup:
Replaced the Avids with XT levers and brakes, switch the tires to team edition, and added spin skins (In idaho, goatheads are prevalent) and added the way cool Flightdeck from shimano.
Bottom Line:
This is a great handling bike, I only have a 150 miles on it so far, but I can't wait till sun really comes out and I can get out for a good long ride, I know I am going to love it on this bike
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
TJW
a Cross-Country Rider
from Mpls, MN Date Reviewed: May 7, 1999
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
1. The comfort over long XC rides is a standout benefit of the Comp. 2. The Comp is a well designed XC bike. It handles quickly through turns, feels fast in the single track and is smooth without energy robbing plushness. 3. The components are a well thought out mix of mid and top line performers. Shifters were XT, not the LX noted in the catalog. Nice upgrade. 4. The shocks do take some time to set up, but when dialed in, offer great XC performance. 5.The Comp has no huge weaknesses. Other bikes tested had knock out weaknesses which kept me from switching over to a FS bike.
Weaknesses:
1. The stock frame sizing includes an interesting mix of a short high rise stem along with a short top tube - Medium size. I am 5'8 and have been riding a Stump M2 in an 18. I lost over 3 of space with the stock set up. I have traded out the stem for a 135mm, removed spacers and set the saddle all the way back and still have lost over 1 from my previous set up. After 300+ miles, I ready to suggest this is a design weakness. Specialized may have been going for quick handling and even weight control with this design. In my case, comfort has suffered. I now would have tested out a large with a short stem. 2. The bike is 2+ lbs above the weight of my M2. This in noticed on climbs and in sprinting through single track. I feel like I've lost a gear and a mile per hour over the hardtail. The comfort does have a cost when going to full suspension. 3. This is a subjective thing, but the prolong saddle is a poor choice for a high end bike. It lacks contour and comfort. The plastic cover becomes hot and slippery. This is an interesting area to save money on a bike designed for XC comfort. 4. The bike should come with a rear shock pump. The bike ride and feel changes dramatically depending on the PSI in the rear shock. Too much and it feels like a hard tail, too little and you'll feel feedback from torque. The zone needs to be worked out over time and you'll need a shock pump to do it. I found one at Supergo mail order for $19.
Similar Products Used:
Trek, Cannodale, GT
Bike Setup:
Stock - Traded out stem and replaced saddle. The SX is set with light rebound/mid stiffness and the Fox is set at 135 PSI reflecting .40 sag. (I weigh 150.)
Bottom Line:
After a year of testing various full suspention XC bikes, I am pleased with the Comp. After riding it for over 200 miles, the overall performance is better than I expected with one exception. The bike is heavier than the M2 and that reflects in uphill speed and in sprinting. An inexpensive offset has been to pump up the tires to 50 PSI. This has helped in the flats at no loss of the bikes signature comfort. The other alternatives require a larger investment. Again, this is in comparision to a light hard tail in racing situations. Bottom line, the Comp is a good choice for XC riders looking for additional comfort while not giving up to much speed.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
bk
a Cross-Country Rider
from amesbury ma Date Reviewed: April 30, 1999
Favorite Trail:
fells
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
component set to $ ratio you get a lot of bike for the money. nice'n' lite coming from a hard tail.
Weaknesses:
the manitou front shock is weak out of the gate. i weigh 180 and needed to add the upgrade polymer plugs to stiffen it up some (the yellow ones) got em free but it is something they should have set up to work with the frame size ( i got the 19'). the rear shock's adjustability (none) is a problem especially on a xc bike when conditions change, lockout would be cool so i can have nice float for downs and stiffen it up on the ups. the rear cassette is lx and i folded it up in my second ride (got a new one from the shop upgraded to xt for 15 bucks)
Similar Products Used:
trek y22 klien mantra pretty much all others in the same component set none had the value though, i like specialized.
Bike Setup:
stumpjumper with xt manitou mach 5 shock (the old one) big upgrade
Bottom Line:
the bike is good. coming from a 4 year old stumpjumper hard tail, this thing is plush. i love the xtr rear derail. nice n accurate. once i got the thing dialed in i find that i bomb down the worst lines that i would never have dreamt of touching at those speeds before. the tires dont always want to hold on all surfaces. it would be nice if the rear shock was more adjustable ie lockout or something to deal with true cross country conditions. all in all i love the bike and am real pleased with what i got for the money. its way more bike than most companies put out in the price range hard tail or soft.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Matt McMurdo
a Cross-Country Rider
from Trenton, Ontario Date Reviewed: April 19, 1999
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Great handling trail bike. Feels light and shoots through the trails. I weigh 145lbs and have the medium red testbike issue (looks exactly like the M4!) The Manitou front is good for my weight and the rear works good at 140psi. The Avid 25 brakes have lots of power and little stiction if lubed right.
Weaknesses:
The rear pivot is a little loose. No, it cannot be tightened. But does not cause any problems when riding and feels firm. The Specialized Pedles that come on it work like crap at first, but after you cut your shoes properly and get them worked in they work fine. I think it's just the thinness of the tires and tubes but i've already had 2 flat front tires. The shop replaced the tube for free and haven't had a flat since then. The Chain rings are Sh*t. I've already busted 2 off of the large and 1 off of the middle?!?!
Bike Setup:
Got it as advertised. Put a JUMBO Lizard Skins on the chainstay, it helps a lot.
Bottom Line:
Great bike. It stands up to just about anything you can give it without a hastle. Specialized did a good job at designing it. Definetly worth the money if you like to bike. Picked it up at Doug's Bicycle in Belleville, Ontario for $2200.00 Can. Great bike shop.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Scott
a Cross-Country Rider
from Bay Area, CA Date Reviewed: April 17, 1999
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Fairly light, no rear-end pogos, lateral stiffness is good - feels like a hard-tail that soaks up the bumps real good!
Weaknesses:
Manitou forks come only with Medium bushings - I need firm kit but LBS will swap so that's ok. Stock pedals are so-so. I did not like the grips, mainly personal preference issues.
Similar Products Used:
Pro-flex/K2, Schwinn full-suspended, GT
Bike Setup:
Medium frame, Stock tires (I weigh in about 180 - run great at 40 psi - any harder and they are skittery!) Shock at 150 psi, Bontrager saddle, Time ATACS, and OURY grips, stem moved down two spacers on top 'til I decide if that's where I cut!
Bottom Line:
I have only done three rides so far - today was 2-1/2 hours. When I get out of the saddle the Manitou SX uses more than half of its' travel and bouces pretty badly with the Medium bushing kit. I will take a Firm kit andtry to make it more progressive. (Comfy tho!) The bike handles a bit quicker than I am used to but is still pretty stable - I'll adapt soon. I like the Time pedals - I have not found an off-road clipless pedal I liked before - had a Shimano 'unexpected release' cost me a collarbone and AC separation a few years back so I have been riding toeclips for almost 20 years off-road. I like the Time road pedals, so trying them off-road. The bike is a great deal - best of the FSR XC lot. Try one!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Spider
a Weekend Warrior
from Colorado Springs Date Reviewed: March 27, 1999
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Bike is light and maneuvers in tight spots with ease. Excellent for single track and tech up or down. Good components. Strong brakes. Price (shop around! found a diff of $400 between local shops)
Weaknesses:
Saddle is hard. Tires and tubes stink (have had several flats from the wimpiest little things).
Similar Products Used:
VRX 300, DBR X-4, GT XCR-2000, GIANT XTC DS1
Bike Setup:
Bike shop put on riser bar at n/c (nice). Otherwise stock. (will replace tires/tubes asap).
Bottom Line:
Used MTBR reviews and test rode many bikes before narrowing down to 3 or 4 candidates. Bought this bike because the shop gave me a smokin deal (way to go Grand West). So far (about 10 rides) I love this bike. Excellent bike for transition from hardtail. Rides light and solid. Smaller frame with riser bars made a nice fit. Shocks working well for hard, but not racing, level riding.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Patou
a Cross-Country Rider
from BC Date Reviewed: March 16, 1999
Duration Product Used:
less than 1 month
Strengths:
Excellent handling,quick,tight and solid. Manitou is great if you adjust it right and the air shock (fox) is smooth and well damped. Shifting is good if the drive train is clean. Tires ok. Feels light. Brakes are strong enough (1-2 fingers).Would be nice with a riser bar but ...
Weaknesses:
Chainrings are crap. Change them if you can. Saddle is vinyl cover, kinda hard .
Similar Products Used:
Rocky M. Instinct and element Race. VRX 300
Bottom Line:
Will post again after a few months of hard riding.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Douglas
a cross-country rider
from Central Coast California Date Reviewed: March 13, 1999
Bottom Line:
I've been riding this bike (FSR XC Comp, the blue one) since December '98. Since then, I've replaced two sub-standard parts that have completely altered the bike's performance. The low-performance Manitou SX front shock was replaced with a Marzocchi Z-2 Atom Bomb and the pogo-prone Fox Vanilla Float was replaced with a super plush Stratos Helix Pro (w/ lockout). The rear shock was a HUGE improvement over the Fox as the stock equipment was pathetic. The riding around here is very rocky and can get quite challenging. Therefore, travel and suspension adjustability are big. I didn't realize just how bad the Fox Vanilla was until I put on the Stratos. If you have this bike loose the Fox shock, it's garbage. The bike handles as well as my M2 hardtail and the lockout feature on the Stratos turns the bike into a stiff climber, when needed. I put Mythos XC tires on front and rear, as the stock tires fell apart after 4 rides. The Mythos tires are sweet.I did shop around quite a bit, looking into various XC FS rigs from Canondale, GT, etc. and then the new soft-tails from Litespeed. I've been waiting patiently for someone to build a light FS bike that is set up for XC riding AND for a reasonable price. Specialized did it! The FSR XC weighes in around 26 lbs. and cost $1,800 retail. Regarding the $4,000, 24lb. soft-tail bike mentioned before the 1 of travel is not very appealing. I'll take the extra 2 lbs. for the plush 3 inches of rear travel. On long, rough rides the travel is a real bonus and my downhill speed and control is much better.I really like the lockout feature of the Stratos for climbing fire roads. You can't lockout a soft tail.I'm rambling...Basically, It's a primo bike and you hardtail hold-outs should seriously consider this bike. Unfortunately, you'll need to retrofit some parts to dial it in.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
dingwa noshatmon
a downhiller
from yaya Date Reviewed: March 11, 1999
Submitted by
Speedfreak
a cross-country rider
from UK Date Reviewed: March 5, 1999
Bottom Line:
Well, now that I have put in some more miles on the bike I can let you know what I think more thoroughly. Sorry if I repeat some of the stuff from the other review, but that’s life! Lets get the complaints out of the way first. I had a problem with the chain, so I got another one free. I also got some free touch up paint as I noticed a small scratch on the down tube. Despite the new chain the drive train was still not happy, so I contacted Specialized who gave me a set of spacers to insert in the bolts to stop the rubbing. They seem to work (With only one ride on the clock), but Specialized (Hereafter SBC) said I could have a new set of free chain-rings if I was still not happy. We will see how things go. Another moan is the cable covers. These are just black plastic sheaths that cover the top tube routed cables and stop them from rubbing. However, due to their loose nature they are actually doing more harm by wrecking the paintjob. Apart from taking them off I have no solution, but if anyone else does would they please tell me as it is a tiny thing but it is driving me mad! I hung out with a bunch of downhillers the other day, and let a bit of air out of my shock to make it plusher, but I let too much out. I have not yet brought a shock pump, but went to my LBS to pump it up. They lent me their cheap pump, and the head would not fit around the valve (It hit the seat tower). The better SKS one worked, but buyers beware about buying a shock pump. The kit on the bike is top class. The wheels have stayed true despite bashings, and the Manitou forks are wonderful. The drivetrain is very susceptible to muck and debris. I often ride in narrow bracken ‘chutes’ and have to stop every so often to fish out the bracken from the cassette. Also, the drivetrain is weird in that it is hard to get a decent gear combo, it is either too hard or too easy. Another annoying trait of the 9-speed rear mech's is a lack of stop on the main pivot, so in easy gears over rocky terrain it keeps bashing the bottom of the stays. The shock needs relatively little in the way of maintenance, just a clean every so often and a little oil on the stanchion. The forks are easy to service as well, but the steerer tube is very prone to rust, so I may fit an MRD one with an alu steerer. It is a bit silly, even on an XC bike these days to miss out disc mounts on the frame, but SBC have done so. Most of this so far has been complaints. Now for the good bit. The bike is amazing, eating up everything. Whilst my hardtail is not redundant, it sits in the shed most of the time. This bike is as plush or as stiff as you want it to be, and handles like a dream, especially in the tight and twisty. I do not regret my purchase, and I am really enjoying it. One last thing about sizing. In my last post I noted that I was 6ft 2in tall (True, I also weigh 150odd lbs. (Depending on breakfast)), and that the bike fitted me nicely. However, it is now worth noting that I may well fit a slightly longer stem that stock, as it is just a little too short. Also, I find I am running the seatpost very high. It is still lower than stock (I cut it), but it can lead to it being a little unstable at very very slow speeds. Oh, and on the subject of seatposts, the Allen key release bugs me, as soon as I can be bothered I will fit a QR. Well, that is it, as usual if you have any comments or questions than do not hesitate to contact me and I will aim to help!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
TJW
a cross-country rider
from USA Date Reviewed: February 19, 1999
Bottom Line:
I have raced and toured on Specialized Stumpjumper M2's for the last 7 years and felt they were a do everything well ride. A full suspension bike promised increased comfort, but I anticipated a price to be paid first, in pushing a higher weight and Second, in handling inefficiency because of the suspension. Specialized designed the FSR XC Comp for a truely great XC experience. The bike handles as well as the M2 on singletrack and in climbing. The weight is not a noticed issue. The fox and SX work well if you take the time to set them up correctly (manuals are great reading!). They and the Stumpjumper frame give the bike a stiffer feel compared to other bikes tested. The frame fit is important to work on at the shop prior to purchase. The frame felt small compared to other bikes tested. The Medium is a 17 set up and the Large is a 19 set up compared to other Specialized Hardtail Stumpjumpers. Take the time to have the shop change out stems, remove spacers and cut the seatpost. I felt the price was fair in comparison to other tested bikes with similar equipment set - Cannodale, Trek, Schwinn.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Speedfreak
a cross-country rider
from England Date Reviewed: January 31, 1999
Bottom Line:
Here is how it works: I will post a review today, then one later on down the line when I have had more time. So far impressions are good spoiled by one or two things. I got my FSR XC on friday mail order. There was minor assembly to do, but nothing I couldnt handle. The suspension on it is excellent, making me realise how bad my '97 judys really were. I noticed a little pogoing on the back down a few drop offs, but increased air in the rear shock solved that. I am 6ft 2in, and the large fits great. It is relatively light, but I plan to put on a flite, a new seatpost and air Englunds. It seems to climb well, you just need to get over the front a bit. That way the rear end behaves itself, but you dont loose traction. Downhill it just rips. I have only had alu hardtails until this, and I dont miss the kick that they give. The componentry seems great for the money, with an XT/XTR mix, and nice touches like a kevlar cornered saddle and dual ply grips. Now for the bad bit. On a relatively straight fireroad uphill, the chain snapped. It went violently enough to leave me with a walk home, as it splayed badly. I have got to call specialized tomorrow. I hope they warranty it. The other thing that bugs me is the inner tubes. I hate the valves, and they are impossible to pump up without a track pump. The rims are also only drilled for the smaller valves. You would have thought they would have at least drilled them with bigger holes, after all, it saves more weight! I am giving it four stars, because despite problems, it showed how good it could be. E-mail me if you need any info, I have plenty becaue I spent ages deciding what bike to buy!
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Richard
a cross-country rider
from UK Date Reviewed: January 11, 1999
Bottom Line:
I've just taken my first ride on my new FSR XC Comp and I must say I'm very pleased. I'm 5'11 and about 160lbs. I bought the large size as I found teh Medium too short in the Top tube. I've cut the seatpost down a little and removed some of the spacers from below the stem. It works great over rough trails both up and downhill, I hardly ever got knocked out of the saddle when pedaling over rocky sections and traction on steep stuff is excellent. I haven't experimented much with the shock yet, Specialized told me to set it with 14mm of sag. It seems to work well for my weight like that. The Manitou fork is plush and steers way better than my old RS Mag 21. The bike has a long wheelbase, which makes it very stable, but it goes exactly where you point it in a neutral and predictable manner.My advice to any potential customer is to check out the sizes carefully before they buy. Getting the shop to fit a shorter post made all the difference for me as I couldn't have ridden the large without cutting the seatpost down. This would have meant me going for the medium sized bike, which I now feel would have been a mistake. I'm giving it 4.5 out of 5 so far as I've only had it for a week. I'll post an update later.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
pete
a cross-country rider
from mass Date Reviewed: December 12, 1998
Bottom Line:
Our local bike shop encourages potential buyers to test ride their bikes...so i did..This is a very good climbing bike...in and surprisingly out of the saddle as well...and of course the shimano 9 speed helps...the bike doesnt seem light when you pick it up but it does ride light...it handles extremely well..easy to lift for going over logs...I went down a long set of stairs and almost killed myself...apparently the rear shock was not properly set for my weight..145lbs.. and once this was adjusted the bike was more manageable..I liked the Manitou front shock...It wasnt necessarily plush like a Zokes but it did seem to handle most of what was thrown at it with ease..and most important it was not flexy..As far as the other items on the bike...I thought the brakes were outstanding..very powerful.... Over all this bike can dance....it is a great all around riding bike...not too heavy like its enduro brothers...Its only short comings ...its over priced...I would buy it without hesitation at $1400.00....I am also going to compare this bike with Diamond Backs very light XR4.....should be interesting...The Specialized performance is worthy of 5 chilies...price brings it down.....
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
AL
a cross-country rider
from Howell, MI Date Reviewed: December 9, 1998
Bottom Line:
I just got my bike a few weeks ago. So far it is the best bike I have ever ridden. It seems to do every thing well. I was disappointed with the stiction of the front Manitou fork so swapped it for a 99 Judy XC. I was told the stiction would go away, but I still wanted the Judy. I took a weight penalty for the better shock though. I also did not care for the Specialized front tire. It worked well on hard pack, but poorly on every thing else. A Kevlar WTB VelociRaptor fixed my troubles, and was a good match for the excellent Specialized rear tire . I now feel as though I have the perfect bike for me. The suspension is plenty supple to ride for long rides with much less fatigue than my old aluminum hard tail. The handling is quick and crisp. The bike is does exactly what I wanted it to do; Take the bumps out of the ride and otherwise work like a good hard tail. The rest of the bikes parts work so well you don’t even notice them. They just function flawlessly and therefore don’t draw attention to themselves. Now if it was just $500 dollars cheaper...
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
joe n
a cross-country rider
from central CT Date Reviewed: December 6, 1998
Bottom Line:
Tried a tricked out Y-33, down to a real 24lbs. It was a nice ride, solid downhiller. BB a little low, so I banged pedals more often than I was used to. And it didn't climb all that well. I had been seriously considering a Y-22, but I opted for the FSR instead. tThe bb is a tad higher, and the FSR climbs stuff even my hardtail couldn't, but the FSR has about 2 gears lower than my '92 Jamis, and that helps. It handles really nice in slow, tight stuff, and that is better than the Trek. It's a real kick in medium speed sinle track,with roots, rocks and slop.And my stock FSR X-C weighs just under 26lbs with Team Edition kevlar tires, while the Y-22 was 28lbs. The Trek is a softer ride down-hill, but not as much better there as the Speclzed is everywhere else. The tires are top shelf, they pulled me thru really wet mud better than I expected, and they grip well on the uphill. And the Avid 2.5s stomp, they're much stronger and smoother than the XTs on the Y. Check one out if you get the chance. It's early, but I'll still give it 5. J
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
DR
a cross-country rider
from WA. USA Date Reviewed: November 29, 1998
Bottom Line:
Now that I have ridden this bike for a month. I want to upgrade my previous review to 5 chiles. This is a great bike! And the Manitou SX is a good match with the Fox Vanilla Float rear shock. If you are even thinking about a new FS bike be sure and try this one out.
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Darrell Roberts
a cross-country rider
from Friday Harbor, Wa. Date Reviewed: November 8, 1998
Bottom Line:
Just took mine on first ride. Coming from an older, much heavier, 96 Ground Control, this bike rocks! Great handling. Yes, it does have a shorter cockpit than my 96 Specialized that was also a medium, but it felt right to me. The Manitou SX is a stiff fork and I prefer my old Bomber so far, but the rear shock (Fox Vanilla Float) provides a great ride. Weight is 26.5 lbs. A little heavier than I had hoped but that is probably because of the Manitou SX. If you want the performance of a hardtail without the harsh ride this bike is for you. IF you want a soft plush ride, get soemthing else.
Overall Rating:
What's New
»
BEST OF MTBR - Check out the highest rated bikes, parts, & gear!
»
LED BIKE LIGHT SHOOTOUT 3 - We test all the newest products and latest light and battery technology in this comprehensive guide»
$ 1799.99
Overall Rating:
Overall Rating:
Overall Rating:
Overall Rating:
