Building on the concept of Fire, TrailBlaster incorporates a completely new and proprietary compound that provides outstanding grip with excellent durability. Add tremendous weight savings, and you have what could possibly be the next XC tire king. Weighing in at a mere 520g for the 2.1, 460g for the 1.95, and an astounding 400g for the 1.8, the TrailBlaster gives you a FULL tread, FULL knobby tire that performs in all conditions, all the time. No whimpy tread and fast wear here. Just solid, long lasting tread that performs they way you need it to.
Submitted by
Warrior til death
a Cross Country Rider
from Hawaii, USA Date Reviewed: February 19, 2009
Favorite Trail:
Mililani-Wahiawa-Waikele
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$14.00
Purchased At:
McCully Bicycle & Sp
Strengths:
Was on sale, so I got a great deal! Light durable, looks sporty, & slight blue/black mix sidewall matches my frame color. Good grip on the edges yet fast enough on the hard pack. I use a tire liner & inflate tire to recommended max. pressure, so I've had no problem with looseness stretching or tube exposure. Tread wear seems very minimal(3 mos.) so far...
Weaknesses:
None to my knowledge.
Similar Products Used:
Kenda Blue Groove, Klaw & Nevagal. Maxxis Ignitor and Fu Fooey Sheng Shin brand?(dept.store) some "Chinese" made crap?!
Bike Setup:
Kona Cinder Cone Manitou fork Easton seatpost & stem Shimano derailer, hubs & shifter combo Trvativ crankset & handlebar Kona or Wellgo pedals(mood) Avid disc brakes WTB rims & saddle Blackburn lights when neccesary, Bulldog locks always neccesary.
Bottom Line:
I've had these tires on my bike for only 3 mos. For spending less than $30.00 on the pair. I can never complain. If these tires reach even near 1 year in life. I'll have to put them in my personal hall of fame. Think I'll stick with Panaracers when I need to go buy replacements for these. Probably upgrade to a "higher" set!!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Tweebler
a Cross Country Rider
from Brookvale, PEI, Canada Date Reviewed: June 9, 2008
Favorite Trail:
McConnell Ridge
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Price Paid:
$30.00
Purchased At:
Jensons
Strengths:
good traction as a back tire
Weaknesses:
Fit too loosely on rim - blow off front.
Similar Products Used:
fire, velociraptor, miche, etc.etc.
Bike Setup:
OCLV hardtail, zokes, XT, WTB, BB7 front disc...
Bottom Line:
I am surprised there are not more comments about how unsafe these are, especially as a front tire. I have had the tire roll off the front rim (Sun UFO) twice with the tube billowing out like putrifying bratwurst. Luckily was slow speed. A friend also had this tire do the same thing - scary if going downhill rapidly. They go on and come off without levers and quite simply, the kevlar bead is too loose. Too bad because, otherwise, seems like a great tread pattern for New England, Maritimes Canada conditions.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Rob Landwehr
a
from Brasilia DF Brazil Date Reviewed: January 26, 2008
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$40.00
Purchased At:
Unibike - Brasília
Strengths:
Very light, great traction, cornering, works well in all conditions and terrains
Nevegal, Nokian NBX, Velociraptor, Leader Pro etc.
Bike Setup:
Kona Hei Hei Ti.
Bottom Line:
Great XC tires. Rolls fast in any condition, bites into mud substrate, Tracks and corners well
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Tom
a Weekend Warrior
from MA Date Reviewed: November 2, 2007
Favorite Trail:
Chaos
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Price Paid:
$25.00
Purchased At:
online
Strengths:
light, good climbing traction on rocks, low rolling resistance
Weaknesses:
weak sidewall, terrible front tire due to severe cornering washout
Similar Products Used:
many
Bike Setup:
1994 Cannondale Super V(can't seem to let it go)
Bottom Line:
Great rear tire for XC. I have used the 1.95 and 2.1 in the rear with success in the past. They offer light-weight traction for technical climbing. On the front they are just horrible. The may roll faster in front, but they just cannot corner without washing out. I have changed these out in favor of the Cinder front and rear. My main riding trail has changed from technical XC to a more rocky/downhill type trail. This required a wider tire to handle lower pressures and the Cinder fits the bill. I still use the TrailBlaster when I rider the technical XC trails.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Mike Hong
a Weekend Warrior
from Woody Hills Date Reviewed: August 4, 2007
Favorite Trail:
Cheesebro Sulphur Springs
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$27.00
Purchased At:
JensonUSA
Strengths:
Huge Footprint, thanks in part to my wider 28mm rims, good corner knobs and pretty light for an all-around Cross Country Tire.
Weaknesses:
None so far
Bike Setup:
321AM Rims, MX Pro Fork, Hardtail, XC Rise Bar
Bottom Line:
Good tire so far.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Richard
a Cross Country Rider
from England Date Reviewed: March 8, 2007
Duration Product Used:
More than 3 years
Strengths:
Fast (2.1), supple, responsive, very good cornering, very few puntures (mainly probs with the tubes), soft compound makes them grippy in all but the worst conditions, good wear have used them daily on and off road for 4 years.
Weaknesses:
None
Similar Products Used:
ritchey xc tyres
Bike Setup:
xc bianchi
Bottom Line:
These are predictable xc tyres. I emphise the word xc. As I said I use 2.1 which are probaly the best for all round riding. They are still very fast. I have found no problems with pinch flats. Obviously these tyres will wear quickly on roads they are soft compound, which means you stick to the surface like glue off and on road. I have even scaled a number of sandy slopes. These tyres require Finesse not brute force. They are quality kit that works in a fit and forget way. Totally brillant tyres.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
will ross
a Cross Country Rider
from anchorage, alaska, USA Date Reviewed: October 8, 2006
Favorite Trail:
heckle tooth
Duration Product Used:
More than 3 years
Price Paid:
$25.00
Purchased At:
performance bike
Strengths:
Good cornering, good climbing, good stopping, Just good.
Weaknesses:
none
Similar Products Used:
maxxis ignitor
Bike Setup:
sanvic ti hardtail, avid ultimate rim brakes, sram X9, rock shox sid
Bottom Line:
best tire i have ever used. i used them for 2 years and they were only worn out a little, then i switched to the maxxis ignitor for 3 months until they became semi slicks. So i put my trailblasters back on switching front and rear, and they are almost the same as they were new. same cornering, same climbing, same stopping. they are just a good tire. if you are into racing go with the 1.95 if you do anyting else go with the 2.1.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Tomas
a Weekend Warrior
from So Ore-gone Date Reviewed: July 13, 2006
Favorite Trail:
Jedi
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$20.00
Purchased At:
Performance
Strengths:
Lightweight, roll pretty fast.
Weaknesses:
Wear quickly, slide on turns, spin when climbing on most any surface.
Similar Products Used:
Bontrager jones and semi, Mythos, Geax (now those were some horrible tires!) WTB Velo and Exi, et cetera.
Bike Setup:
26 lb. full susp cross country/trail, v-brakes on ceramic
Bottom Line:
They wore out fast for an older guy who's not hard on gear. Once I replaced the front with another brand,it was clear that the rear just couldn't keep up. When cornering, it would slide out (at about 35psi for 150 lb rider)and the front would keep on tracking, thereby saving me from being body slammed into the poison oak. Any technique used while climbing out of the saddle still results in wheelspin, even on east coast bulletproof hardpack. The're lighter that most of what's out there, straightline speed is good with adequate flat protection, so racers with unlimited tire budgets might like them best. Get a bunch of 'em on sale and replace after every ride.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Scott
a Cross Country Rider
from Mendham Date Reviewed: July 12, 2006
Favorite Trail:
All
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Purchased At:
Anywhere
Strengths:
Durable, does the job
Weaknesses:
Wear out quick.
Similar Products Used:
Panaracer XC Pro
Bike Setup:
Blur, full XTR. Nuff' said.
Bottom Line:
I run the Trailblaster on the rear, Fire XC Pro on the front. That works. No complaints other than at times I notice the rear wears quicker than when I ran it with full Fire XC's front and back. I've tried so many other tires, WTB Velocoraptors too heavy, IRC crap, you name it. These tires are the best, period. If your serious about XC I would NOT recommend putting the Trail Blaster on the front however. Wipe out baby.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Brian
a Weekend Warrior
from Prescott, Arizona, USA Date Reviewed: July 5, 2006
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Strengths:
light weights, big side nobs
Weaknesses:
looks narrow
Similar Products Used:
panaracer fire xc pro. wtb mutano raptor 2.24
Bike Setup:
giant trance
Bottom Line:
I just switched from the fire xc pro's to the trail blaster and I cannot tell any difference in the ride. They seem to corner just as well and may climb a little better. I ride mostly hard pack, some sand and rock and they seem great not much mud here is Arizona so I do not know how they handle when wet. So far a great light weight tire.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jeff Fleming
a Cross Country Rider
from Albuquerque, NM, USA Date Reviewed: November 11, 2005
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
lightweight, low rolling resistance
Weaknesses:
lack of traction, susceptible to washing out...
Similar Products Used:
Fire XC Pro
Bottom Line:
This tire is a good choice for buff trails particularly when racing. It handles fairly well but lacks really good traction when cornering (1.95 width) and is susceptible to washing out in loose stuff. The tread seems agressive enough, but just doesn't bite like the Fire series of tires by Panaracer and doesn't lock up on the big rocks as well either.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jason Scheiding
a Cross Country Rider
from Travers City, MI, USA Date Reviewed: July 16, 2005
Favorite Trail:
Vasa Singletrack
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$15.00
Purchased At:
Cambria Bike
Strengths:
Outstanding grip.Sticks like glue and rails corners like a ferarri. Super lightweight. Look good too.
Weaknesses:
1.8 is quite narrower then expected.
Bike Setup:
Trek 8900 sl. Sid world cup fork.
Bottom Line:
Best tire I have ever used period. Climbs like nothing else, corners even better. I could not be happier with my purchase. I bought another set in 2.1 for my full suspension bike. To top it off. the 1.8's cost me 15 a piece. This tire is worth way more. Id gladly pay 30 plus if I had too knowing how well they work now. Buy it , love it, forget about it, the last thing you will think about on a trail will be your tires.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Luis Villanueva
a Cross Country Rider
from Juarez, Mexico Date Reviewed: June 16, 2005
Favorite Trail:
Franklin Moutain "El Monje"
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$35.00
Purchased At:
beyond bikes
Strengths:
Very light, excelent grip, strong enought for XC, I feel more confortable Up hill since I try these tires.
Weaknesses:
A little thin
Similar Products Used:
For me this is unique
Bike Setup:
Kona Kikapu 05, Fox Float RP3, Minute 2:00 100mm, FSA Carbon Crank,UST Mavic Croosland rims, Disc Brakes Hayes, Thomson layback seat post, Selle San Marcos, XTR the rest....
Bottom Line:
Just put No tubes and the tires never loose air, excelent tire for all type of terrain, I tried a lot of tires, Phyton, Michelin, Maxxis, and this is the tire that I feel right for me.......100%
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
UtahMTBeer
a Cross Country Rider
from Sandy, UT Date Reviewed: April 18, 2005
Favorite Trail:
Wasatch Crest, Slickrock
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$30.00
Purchased At:
LBS
Strengths:
Excellent grip, light weight, very good in loose rock
Weaknesses:
Not tested but it does not look like a good front wheel tire., fast wear
Similar Products Used:
Kenda Karma, Fire XC Pro, Bontrager Jones AC
Bike Setup:
Santa Cruz Blur, XT serup, front Continenetal Vertical Protection 2.3, back Panaracer Trailblaster 2.1, other setup-irrelevent
Bottom Line:
I can't understand the bad reviews here but for me this tire works really good. I have Continental Vertical PROtection 2.3 (looks like a 2.1) in the front and the TrailBlaster in the back. I Putrchased my SC Blur and it came with very thin light Kenda Karma tires. Although very light and fast for hard pack racing I tore them up on my first trip to Moab. Then I got my Conti Vertical to the front (kept Kenda Karma in the back)and was still not satisfied with how I was able to climb loose rock and gravel especially on steep hills in races. My rear wheel would always slip. So one day I got mad and read all reviews under the sun , examined all tread patterns and decided to give TrailBlaster a try on my back wheel. I was immediately able to tell a difference in climbing and the grip I was getting. Solved the problem in loose dirt and rock. As far as I am concerned, this is one superior tire and when it wears out, I will most definitely purchase another one. I would not put it on the front wheel though since I think more knoby pattern is needed there. But with the combination with Fire XC pro in the front, it might be really good.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
nick hutton
a Racer
from Canada Date Reviewed: April 12, 2005
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Purchased At:
Cambria
Strengths:
Look Cool, Worked well in all conditions, light tire!
Weaknesses:
Compound is way to soft. Tires wear out very fast. Rubber is unpredictable. A giant weakspot developed in my tread (on the riding surface). Used stan's, no fix, now tire is garbage.
Similar Products Used:
Michelin jet s ust, panaracer fire, irc mythos, smoke, dart, specialized roll x
I have used the conventional tire with my ust rim. Nice and light but major wear and a lot of tear!!
The tire seems to be made of a really soft compound which wears out really fast (got one season out of them).
Good performance tire but for the money, they don't last long enough. If your running ust rims, use a ust tire. The extra weight saved is not worth the tire damage.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Kayu
a Cross Country Rider
from Penang Date Reviewed: April 11, 2005
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Bottom Line:
I seems to agreed with Bob on the tires size. No wonder my Vetta V100HR never measure distance accurately, I nearly put a negative review on the computer. Never thought of the size of tyre is not accurate. I am using the 2.1, so now I will reset my wheelsize to 1.95 and see if the computer now measures correctly or not.
Will put 3 chilies (average) now.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
bob
a Cross Country Rider
from lebanon, oregon usa Date Reviewed: April 11, 2005
Favorite Trail:
anything fast and technical
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Purchased At:
Stutzmans Bike/ Fly/ and Stove shop
Strengths:
Looks cool and fast rolling, also very light.
Weaknesses:
Even though these come with a pinch resistant bead they still pinch flat very easy. Also hard to find a terrain where they work well, a very sketchy tire.
Similar Products Used:
IRC backcountry, Tioga xc pro fat 66 1.95, specialized team control/ master, WTB mutanoraptor 2.4/2.24.
Bike Setup:
KHS 2002 FXT pro w/R.S.sid race shoch, R.S. Duke sl 100 fork, XT shifters, derailers, LX cassette, OdI lock on yeti grips, The fenders. (Trail blasters came stock on bike)
Bottom Line:
These tires suck! I had high hopes for them but was let down big time! First of all they are very narrow, 2.1 measures 1.95/ and 1.95 measures a 1.85. These tires never felt right under my bike. I wouldn't even bother racing on them, they're too unpredictable.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Dennis Pedersen
a Racer
from Santa Cruz, CA, USA Date Reviewed: March 1, 2005
Favorite Trail:
Soquel Demo Forest
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$18.00
Purchased At:
Cambria Bike Outfitter
Strengths:
Very light weight (only 400 grams!), and great price. A real bargain XC race tire.
Weaknesses:
Probably won't last long or handle loose gravel or sharp rocks well.
Similar Products Used:
IRC Mythos XC, Specialized Team and Dirt, WTB Velociraptors, many others.
Bike Setup:
1998 Specialized Stumpjumper hardtail, all rebuilt after 20,000 miles.
Bottom Line:
I bought these tires, in the 1.8 size with Kevlar bead, for XC race use. I wanted very light weight at a good price. These were an awesome choice at $18 and just 400 grams! I worried that I'd sacrifice too much handling with these, but I just finished my first XC race with these, and I'm very happy with them in all respects, so far anyway. Maybe winning my class improved my opinion of them too!
Here's how I judge gear: If I don't even have to think about the stuff while using it, it must be doing its job well. During this race I completely forgot I was running new tires.
These really felt a lot like my old favorites from Specialized, and somewhat like the IRC Mythos XCs, but more precise. The IRCs were a little squirmy at times, but the TrailBlasters just held their line in all trail conditions I encountered, like good Specializeds. Well, except for in soft beach sand, and no tire I've run could do that well.
The race course was in Fort Ord, near the Sea Otter Classic course by Monterey, and it had mostly sandy soil, moist hardpack, some minor mud, and loose beach sand. Some short, but very steep, climbs, but not a lot of roots or loose gravel. 15 miles and 1,500 feet of climbing. Not once did I think these tires weren't up to the task.
Over time, I'm certain these tires will wear out fast due to the shallow knobs. But since I only use them for races, they should last long enough. But I do think the thin sidewall is probably vulnerable to rock damage. It's also likely that their light construction means they will pinch-flat easier with heavier riders or on rocky trails. I would say heavier riders, or those who are more downhill oriented, or those who ride on nasty rocks or loose gravel a lot, should look for a heavier tire with taller knobs.
For me, in my area, these are perfect for the XC races I do.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Mike
a Cross Country Rider
from X, New Jersey Date Reviewed: December 1, 2004
Favorite Trail:
any I can find
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$27.00
Purchased At:
Jenson
Strengths:
They're round, black, and have logos on both sides.
Weaknesses:
Read summary.
Similar Products Used:
Too many to bother listing.
Bike Setup:
Cove Stiffee w/Manitou Sherman
Bottom Line:
I tried to like these tires. They're not cheap. And what about all the great reviews???
On the street - the noisiest tires I've ever ridden. MAD vibration (and I weigh 180). They wear FAST. Don't feel like a light, supple tire.
OK, you say they're off-road tires? I agree.
They're good for medium to hard-packed, relatively flat and dry terrain. Guess what? My Maxxis Hookworms work well in those conditions, too. Better, maybe. NO TREAD (well, teenie diamonds).
Uphill, they slip. Cornering, they slide. Over obstacles, they bottom out and don't grip. Downhill? Can't stop without rear sliding. Mud sticks to them as if they had tightly spaced knobs. What a horrible tire.
At high pressure (45-55 psi), they skitter all over. At low pressure (30-40 psi), they get sluggish and bottom out.
Who the heck is writing these grand reviews?!
I don't think I've ever been this disappointed with a tire.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Kayu
a Cross Country Rider
from Penang Date Reviewed: August 10, 2004
Giant NRS XTC Team Avid Cable Disc XTR RD-M960 XTR Cassette Ti XTR Rapidfire XT FD-M750 Easton EA-70 STEM Thomson Seatpost RockShox SID Team TruVative Stylo Team Crankset Mavic X221 Rim
Bottom Line:
This is the best felt tyres that I ever used. It's light, spin well, feel good, and importantly when you ride on it, you feel that you are in control. I was hesitated before buying this due to the price is at the higher side, but I am satisfied with the price that I paid in exchange of the outstanding performance.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
mark e
a Cross Country Rider
from central va. Date Reviewed: July 23, 2004
Favorite Trail:
Pocahontas
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Price Paid:
$22.00
Purchased At:
Jenson USA
Strengths:
speed,traction,control,shedding of debris,weight,price,looks,footprint
Weaknesses:
doesnt do well with Stans,only 500 miles (offroad)and they wear out
Similar Products Used:
many WTB,Vittoria,Tiogas,Kendas
Bike Setup:
DBR XTS-3
Bottom Line:
cheap,reliable,predictable,awesome tire.Ive used up my 2nd set now and would buy these again if they had not come out with the cinder.I have yet to find a condition that these tires did not laugh at.wet,dry,mud,rocks,sand,leaves,scree,logs,roots,creeks,name it these tires have conquered it here in Va. from the beach to the mts. and in between.if you want a reliable yet inexpensive tire get these.worth a lot more than I paid for them for sure
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jason
a Cross Country Rider
from Mendham, NJ Date Reviewed: July 7, 2004
Favorite Trail:
All
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$34.00
Purchased At:
Campmor
Strengths:
Fast, well made
Weaknesses:
Not recommended for front tire use
Similar Products Used:
Fire XC
Bike Setup:
Kickass race bike
Bottom Line:
Had these on my ride for about 3 months now. Always rode the Fire XC, front and rear for years. Someone told me to try these out for the Fire XC's side treads tend to break. Well, the jury is out. You DONT want one on your front, only the rear. The tire is a little narrow, doesnt appear to be a 2.1 but they insist it is. When I had one on the front it was a disaster. Didnt hold up well on fast cornering. The rear is good. Sheds mud. Super quick. Does the job. Best setup is put a Fire XC on the front, this on the rear. Also, make sure you have the treads facing the right direction if you put one on. Makes a world of difference. Thats it.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
dakota coates
a
from halifax, nova scotia, canada Date Reviewed: June 27, 2004
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$10.00
Purchased At:
from a friend (new)
Strengths:
looks, exelent up-hill traction and braking control, light
Weaknesses:
road (vibrates a lot)and is noisy
Similar Products Used:
specialized, maxxis.
Bike Setup:
hard rock
Bottom Line:
exelent all-round tire, exelent traction in mud and loose dirt. gives confidence in loose dirt and mud and braking
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
AG Jones
a Cross Country Rider
from Louisville, KY Date Reviewed: June 21, 2004
Favorite Trail:
Waverly
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$30.00
Purchased At:
jensonusa
Strengths:
Excellent mud-shedder and for hard-packed singletrack.
Weaknesses:
Doesn't last long, sidewall worn to the white thread quickly.
Similar Products Used:
Specialized Roll-x, WTB Wierwolf
Bike Setup:
Rockhopper Comp upgraded to XT, Truvativ stylo cranks, Black Sport Elite Fork, etc
Bottom Line:
Small, knobbies, but great for shedding-mud; keeps rear-derailluer clean. Not good on wet roots or rocks. Good for packed, hard surfaces (lightweight).
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
gingerttoth shebangs
a Racer
from ringwood, NJ USA Date Reviewed: April 26, 2004
Favorite Trail:
palmer park, Colorado Springs
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Price Paid:
$40.00
Purchased At:
Town Cycle, west milford, NJ
Strengths:
Awesome traction
Weaknesses:
the opposite of awesome traction
Similar Products Used:
too many to list
Bike Setup:
very fine race bike
Bottom Line:
Those who crap on this tire have no clue what performance is all about. I can say that I have tried the fire xc pro and hated them though. These trailblaster 2.1 are the most impressive tires I have ever tried and raced on. You put more stress on your tires when racing than you could ever do just trailriding. And all I can say is that the tires are amazing. I have complete confidence in the front cornering at high speeds and the back grips amazingly when climbing, even in the wet. But they will slip on wet rock surfaces as will any tire. That's just commmon sense. You want performance these are it baby, matter of fact I'm going to by a set right f'in now. YEAH.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Bjorndoggie Cruiser
a Weekend Warrior
from Sacramento CA, USofA Date Reviewed: March 15, 2004
Favorite Trail:
Forresthill Divide Loop
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$30.00
Purchased At:
Internet
Strengths:
Light, roll well.
Weaknesses:
Not a lot of traction in loose stuff. Thin rubber casing.
Similar Products Used:
Specialized, Michelin, etc.
Bike Setup:
Trick.
Bottom Line:
Ok. I liked these tires because they roll easy and are light. Not the greatest traction, but acceptable. They're great in the winter because they shed mud very well. So I'm thinking I'll use these in the winter and maybe get some Fire XC's for summer. I don't think so. I washed my bike after a couple of rides this weekend and lo and behold my rear tire is showing threads all the way around down the middle of the tire. These tires don't have a lot of miles on them (knee surgury) and have 90 percent of the tread still on them. But the tire (rear) is shot and I really souldn't have been out on it. I guess a 520 gram full knobby tire is too good to be true.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
thetas
a Cross Country Rider
from virginia Date Reviewed: February 15, 2004
this is my second set in a year and they have been a great tire in the water logged woods of va.hardpack here is softpack,the conering,braking,footprint,and uphill traction have been outstanding!solved the puncture problem with STANS notubes.will get these in a ust next maybe.the mud shedding has been excellent for me(name a color and type i been thru it)had to get a rear fender cuz it THROWS the mud off like a dog shaking off water.would i buy them again YES. would i recomend them NO(i dont want others to have the advantage i have ha ha)YES I WOULD IF I DONT RIDE AGAINST YOU.i see a lot of people give these tires a bad rap and that is a shame yet it is good for us that like them cuz there will be plenty for us when we want more.if it ever drys out the treadlife will get better here(rode the mt vernon trail and they were great)all this softpack granite is like sandpaper on the knobs.i blame the fireroad conditions and overall slop for the treadwear problems. buy em if you want a reliable tirefor overall conditions.no tire is perfect for all but this one is close
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
matt miller
a Racer
from Nazareth, pa Date Reviewed: January 18, 2004
Favorite Trail:
forget the name
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Purchased At:
Curt's Cyclery
Strengths:
light-400 grams for 1.8
Weaknesses:
skinny-i guess a 1.8 is
Similar Products Used:
lots
Bike Setup:
nrs, xtr stuff, magura martas, light stff
Bottom Line:
these are sweet in mud and hardpack. u feel like you are on a road bike. this is good until you get to rocks, becouse the road bike feeling doesnt diminish totally. buy these if u want to be cool and fast.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Grant
a Cross Country Rider
from Macon, GA, USA Date Reviewed: October 28, 2003
Favorite Trail:
Oak Mountain, AL
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$26.00
Purchased At:
online and Bike Tech of Macon
Strengths:
Works really well as a rear tire. Hooks up well after a little drift in the corners.
Weaknesses:
The 2.1 size is more like a 1.8. The tread will not last very long at all. That sort of negates what looks like a realtively bargain tire.
Similar Products Used:
Fire XC, Bontrager AC,
Bike Setup:
Klein hardtail, semi zooted.
Bottom Line:
I rode the Fire XCs a long time and dug them. A really muddy race last spring led me to want something that would drop the mud better, though, so I tried some Trailblasters. Like I said above, the 2.1 size is nowhere near it. It looks significantly narrower. If you are used to the sort of buoyant ride that Fire XCs at that width provide, that's kind of out the window. They did, however, shed mud really well throughout our ridiculously wet summer down here. I used them front and back until a wreck in a race made the bead up front blow apart. Don't know if that speaks of any weakness. Anyway, I went back to a normally sized 2.1 tire up front after that. I found that the combination of a realistically sized 2.1 up front with the Trailblaster on back worked better than running two Trailblasters. I think a variation on that theme is the way to go. Finally, the center tread does not last long. I got something like 3 or 4 months out of one up front before the threads beneath the rubber started to show. In summary (ahem), it's the Trailblaster is okay on the back, lame up front, and considering how quickly the tread goes it really isn't much of a bargain.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
mark
a Weekend Warrior
from colonial heights,va Date Reviewed: October 23, 2003
Favorite Trail:
pocahontas
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$27.00
Strengths:
overall performance, traction on all conditions(water is wet, you dont grip!)mud shedding is awesome,predictability
Weaknesses:
got only 500 miles before wearing out, too much sunshine dryrots them,which made them wear faster
Similar Products Used:
wtb(many,tioga factory,vittoria
Bike Setup:
mongoose xs850
Bottom Line:
i reviewed these tires in feb this year under real bad conditions and it took till aug. for them to get better and i must say these tires were just as awesome as when i first got them.had one spot where i expected them to slide(cuz all others did before) and they stayed true but i was at a bad angle and wrenched my back(back in june)i now have learned they hook up when i need and slide when i need.been riding them for 8 mths but that was not an option.i just ordered another set today cuz cambria has them on sale for $22!these tires are great and i will not switch to others ony time soon.i just got another bike cuz i broke the frame on my diamond back.its a freerider and they do great on it too
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Shredder
a Cross Country Rider
from Central Pennsylvania Date Reviewed: October 13, 2003
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Purchased At:
na
Strengths:
Light weight, I like the purdy yellow ones. Seems like a great rear tire
Weaknesses:
They will wear out, they will get flats eventually if you ride hard enough. Impossible to find them in yellow.
Similar Products Used:
IRC Notos
Bike Setup:
Jekyll
Bottom Line:
I cannot believe all the whining I am reading by people about these tires. Waaaaa they slide in the wet, waaaaaa they slide in sand. I bet you guys couldn't hang with me if I were riding slicks! I am using Notos on the front, Panaracer Trailblasters on the back. I like the name trailblaster, reminds me of myself, I am a trailshredder. The Notos work great on the front for that extra traction I get cornering on the slick rocks, leaves, and mud we get here in Pennsylvania, the toughest place to ride in the whole United States. The Trailblaster I am using is on the rear. It sheds the mud we have over here very quickly. One time I hit a mud hole and sank to my front hub, and the rear end came up, but I somehow pedaled out of the hole with the blasters. I am not sure how they would work on the front though. I might go with the Fire XC Pro on the front. The only problem is the tires are impossible to get in yellow. I like colors. My bike mixes and matches. I like people to see and remember my bike everytime I lap them in the woods. Yeah, I am a shredder, so take from me, my tire setup is radical, I am radical, so learn something here, and quit your whining. hehehe.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Dave
a
from Sale Victoria Australia Date Reviewed: September 16, 2003
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Purchased At:
Spikes Bikes
Strengths:
Light Weight great on hard pack
Weaknesses:
Not great in the mud (but they are not designed for this)
Similar Products Used:
Wildgriper xl, smoke/dart, maxxis and kenda
Bike Setup:
hardtail, fox forxs up front
Bottom Line:
Great on the hardpack, and roll weel too, these are not great in the mud (clay crap they are not designed for this)They need a fair amount of air to stop bottoming out
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jon Hall
a Cross Country Rider
from Tulsa Date Reviewed: September 7, 2003
Favorite Trail:
Windsor - Santa Fe NM & Turkey Creek Tulsa, Ok
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$25.00
Purchased At:
Jenson USA
Strengths:
Extremely Rigid - Predictable Grip - Can be used on all types of terrain; sand, mud, rock, root, pebble, gravel, pavment - Light weight - Easy to mount -
Weaknesses:
Measures as 2.0, not 2.1 as advertised - some vibration on pavement, but no biker should be concerned with this if they are doing any type of real riding (which is off road - thus the name "cross county" or "downhill" or "mountain biking!!!!" DO NOT USE WITH STAN'S NO TUBES -It will blow off the rim. NO TUBES is a joke for the most part any way!! Only use with UST tires for added puntcure resistence - the intended use for tube tires by manufacturer's specs is "tires to be used with tubes" your chancing your own safety using NO TUBES in a TUBE tire - think about it!
GIANT NRS - All XT equipped with XT hydraulic disc brakes, Mavic 3.1 UST rims
Bottom Line:
I am absolutely shocked at some of the reviews I have read and must point out that anyone who is disappointed with any tire they buy because it washes out when they ride on rocks and roots in wet conditions is deceived as to the performance they should expectfrom any tire. These people are not going to sustain in those conditions on any tire and they might consider their ability to ride their bikes (or inablility). REALISTICALLY, these tires are awesome. I ride in New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Southern California and I cannot emphasize enough that this is one of the only, if not ONLY, Do-All tires there are. The nobbies are stout, yet the tire is only 520 grams! The nobbies over center are smooth to get even contact and reduces rolling resistence. The nobbies are tall and cut large and strait so they catch roots and edges of rock or paddle in sand and mud. The angles they set the other small nobbies bite in turns and the side nobbies are doubled so they don't tear. This tire has not yet begun to wear and I have placed 250 miles of large jagged rock on them at all angles and skids and the steepest of downhills and sharpest of turns. The tire has spent 50 miles on pavement - no effect. They are fast and they are in control and take any skidding or beating you can give them. (I weigh 200 lbs on top of that!!) To let you know what other tires I think are good to compare these to are any continental (Explorer and verticals knobs break to easily on rock, but otherwise are the best all around traction - because rigidity is most important when riding the ridiculously rocky terrain I am on in Tulsa, which is worse than california and the rocky mountains in New Mexico, I chose the trailblasters. Also, the pythons are horrible in softened hard pack and sand and mud - though are durable and plush on rock. The Revolt is fast, but only for hard pack, and the AC Jones does not offer any consistent bite - too much flat surface nobbie to gain traction. Any Michelin made - well, they should never have been made; the Wild Gripper is exactly as it's name implies - an unpredictable wild gripper - I chucked them. As for the Trailblaster, I hope they will be around forever!!!!!!! They function exactly as their name implies!!!! Enjoy!!! PS - Would some of you guys proof read your typing - you appear to be illiterate or lazy and it ruins the credibility of your reviews!!!!!!!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Ian
a Cross Country Rider
from High Wycombe, UK Date Reviewed: July 24, 2003
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
Using the 2.1's; great all round tyre. Trails are mostly dry this summer with a few muddy puddles. These tyres seem to be predictable on most stuff which is ideal as I'm a novice. They roll reasonably well.
Weaknesses:
Have quite a few punctures but could be just bad luck. Expensive if you just ride for the scenery.
Similar Products Used:
Hutchinson Python Airlight
Bike Setup:
Giant NRS2
Bottom Line:
I recommend them for fun riders. Probably faster stuff out there for hardcore racers.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Matt
a Weekend Warrior
from Boston, MA Date Reviewed: July 11, 2003
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$25.00
Purchased At:
bikerbob.com
Strengths:
Lite weight. Good on smooth fire roads and great tracking on flat rock.
Weaknesses:
Tread pattern wasn't deep enough to hook up on loose gravel and roots.
Similar Products Used:
WTB Velocirapter. (I was looking for something slightly smoother than the 'raptor - will have to keep looking).
Bike Setup:
basically stock GT alum. hardtail from ~'97.
Bottom Line:
Tested kevlar 2.1 model on rear w/~40 lbs pressure. Didn't really hookup for the terrain I ride (mix of single track and trails which are close to fire roads). Was great on the tamer stuff and flat rock climbs, but didn't hook up at all on roots and loose gravel. I first took it out on the rain and it wasn't that great so tried it a few more rides when it was dry - no difference. I'll try it on the front later and report on that. Might try a Michelin Wildgripper Hot S if I can find it in black.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
William Fu
a Racer
from Toronto Date Reviewed: July 10, 2003
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$40.00
Purchased At:
lbs
Strengths:
Superlight weight for 1.80 tire that has full knobs
Weaknesses:
tire width, wet rock and root traction.
Similar Products Used:
everything, from tioga farmer johns, panaracer smokes, all ritchey tires, all michelin tires
Bike Setup:
trek 8500 xtr stuff with some xt stuff, 2001 SID fork chris king/bontrager wheelset. 20.5 pound hardtail racer whooohoo
Bottom Line:
This review is only for the 1.80 tire. Did solo 8 hour and solo 24 hour race on these tire with the occasional cross country races thrown in . excellent tire for hardpack conditions. with light weight tubes you can easily drop a half a pound to 1 pound from your wheels depending on what tires you run. Advertised weight was 400 grams but average weight of tire that i got was 420 grams.Wet rock and wet root traction bites. Deep sand causes front tire to wash out in corners. Thin width makes tire tricky to ride over rocks. the tire deflects a lot more than a thicker tire would. Ran tire at 40psi any higher, tire is to harsh. Not recomended a trail tire race only, as a regular trail tire 3 chili's as a cross country race tire 5 chili's
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Ken Sechler
a Cross Country Rider
from Frederick, MD, USA Date Reviewed: June 16, 2003
Favorite Trail:
Frederick Watershed
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$25.00
Purchased At:
Performance
Strengths:
Seemed to resist pinch flatting
Weaknesses:
Did not handle damp conditions well.
Similar Products Used:
Fire XC, IRC Mythos, Smoke/Dart, Velociraptors, etc.
Bike Setup:
SC Superlight
Bottom Line:
This is not a complete review. I only used the tire in damp conditions. The trails I ride are very rocky and it has rained like heck here this spring. All those rocks are slicker than snot now.
That being said, I was very disappointed in the traction. This tire (used on rear only) had an alarming tendency to wash out side to side on even the slightest off-camber. Uphill traction was equally disappointing with frequent spin-outs. The braking however was solid and the tire seemed to resist pinch flatting (but time will tell on this count).
I don't like to give poor reviews, but after my last ride I will religate this to the scrap pile. For damp conditions Fire XC's are a much better choice. Even my IRC Mythos's hook up better. I will give it one more try when the trails dry out. I suspect the tire will behave much better in dryer, hard pack conditions. I will try to submit another review then.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
freddie
a Cross Country Rider
from Harbor City, CA USA Date Reviewed: May 31, 2003
Favorite Trail:
Sullivan/Backbone Loop
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$34.00
Purchased At:
Performance
Strengths:
Definitely fast rolling for a full knobby, light, grippy in a variety of technical conditions, excellent climbing traction.
Weaknesses:
Feels a little sketchy on fast fire roads that have a loose, sandy top layer over hardpack.
Similar Products Used:
Hutchinson Python, Bontrager Super Revolts (total crap), IRC Mythos, Michelin Wildgripper Comp S Lights (total crap 2).
Bike Setup:
Trek Fuel 98 with: Trailblaster 2.1 tires, Chris King headset, Truvativ Stylo Team crankset (03 model), SRAM 9.0 cassette, Mavic 517/XTR, WTB SST.98 saddle, Avid SD 7 brakes and levers, etc.
Bottom Line:
Great tire! A rare combination of a full knobby that rolls fast. I like one tire that I can trail ride on technical stuff as well as do the occasional cross country race and this tire is one of the few that can do both well. Compared to the Hutchinson Pythons (a fine tire in its own right) that I was running on before, the Trailblasters are way better in braking, technical singletracks, rocks, and holding a line on off camber straights and corners. Only the aforementioned fireroad conditions give it some problems, but this is a compromise I can live with.
Definitely get the 2.1 (only 530g) size . The 2.1 Trailblasters are not a "high volume" tire. In addition, they're a bit narrower than my 2.0 Pythons. Even at my weight, 135lbs, I notice they are not as supple as the Pythons despite running them at the same pressures (30 lbs front, 32lbs rear).
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Sprocketeer
a Cross Country Rider
from Narashino, Chiba, Japan Date Reviewed: May 28, 2003
Favorite Trail:
The dirt, give me dirt. I don't want to even HEAR a car.
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$40.00
Purchased At:
Seo Cycle (special order), Tokyo Bay LalaPort, Minami-Funabashi, Chiba, Japan
Strengths:
The design is a work of art. These are about as well designed as the Thompson Elite seatpost. Add these to the best-of-the-best line of products. These are just awesome tires.
They put carbon down the center to increase the durability and strength of the tire, but made the sides softer to grab on hard turns. Even better though, they made this gradual across the tread, so it's always just right.
Weaknesses:
I can only say they don't shed mud as well as Hutchinson Alligator Golds, but those tires are so heavy (800 grams) that it's just a matter of considering the trade-off. Do you want to do anything tires or are you a weight weenie who wants high performance besides. I'm the latter, so I can accept this as a minor weakness. The Hutchinsons don't beat these in the turns though.
Also, I don't like the look of the colors on the Trail Blasters, so I went with black/black, but probably would have done so regardless.
Similar Products Used:
Hutchinson (awesome but heavy), Bontrager (the worst tires I've used ever since I started riding seriously long, long ago), IRC (very nice), and these (which I'll be using from now on I believe).
Bike Setup:
2002 TREK 8000 (ZR9000 frame), bought stock but made a lot of changes, including: Bontrager Race Lite titanium rail saddle, Thompson Elite seatpost, Shimano XT crankset (172.5mm instead of the standard issue 175mm) and Shimano XT BB, Shimano 959 pedals, Shimano XTR brake shoes (kept the Avid SD3 V-brakes), Shimano XTR teflon cables and housings (made a huge difference in shifting and braking), yadda, yadda, yadda planning on changing to a Chris King headset and Phil Woods hubs.
Bottom Line:
I love these tires. I'm particularly high on them after a year on the Bontrager Jones AC tires that came with my bike--which I seriously think were going to get me killed.
The only other tires I've ever really thought were great were the Hutchinson Alligator Golds. The Hutchinsons are really heavy though, at 800 grams compared to only about 540 grams on the Trail Blasters. These tires are even lighter than the Firc XC Pros--which I think were the lightest knobbies in the world until these came along.
The construction and materials are really state-of-the art on the Trail Blasters. I especially like the idea of putting carbon in the center.
These tires cut and grab better than anything I've ever used.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Iceaxe
a Cross Country Rider
from Ann Arbor, MI Date Reviewed: May 22, 2003
Favorite Trail:
Pontiac lake
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$25.00
Purchased At:
can't remember
Strengths:
Umm... light weight
Weaknesses:
don't roll fast, horrible breaking, and they are perhaps the worst cornering tire I've ever used.
Similar Products Used:
Fire XC pro 2.l; Conti vert pro 2.3
Bike Setup:
Jekyll
Bottom Line:
Front or rear, it doesn't matter, this tire sucks!! They roll OK at higher pressures but don't give any traction. Drop the pressure and they gain a little bit of traction but then they roll like moto cross tires. You just can't win. This review is for the 2.1 version.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
jake
a Weekend Warrior
from gaithersburg, md Date Reviewed: April 23, 2003
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Fast on hardpack
Weaknesses:
Sucks on rocks, wet roots soft soil or mud. Packs up with Mud quickly.
Similar Products Used:
Panaracer fire XC pro 2.1
Bike Setup:
Titus switchblade
Bottom Line:
If you race or ride on relatively dry trails this tire is great. If your riding technical, rocks, roots, and loose soil frequently stay away. I bought some WTB Motoraptors. I'll seehow those work.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
freerider
a Weekend Warrior
from kent WA usa Date Reviewed: April 18, 2003
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Purchased At:
was on bike
Strengths:
TREAD IS OK
Weaknesses:
THE SIDE WALL IS WEAK
Bike Setup:
2002 KHS FXT COMP WITH NEW WTB MOTORAPTOR 2.4 NORCAL EDITION AND A RACE FACE BASH GUARD AND THE NEW SHERMAN FORK
Bottom Line:
I WENT TO DO SOME RIDING AND A ROCK PUNCTURED THE REAR TIRE. I CAN FIT MY PINKY THROUGH THE WHOLE. I WASN'T ON A FREERIDE TRAIL JUST A REGULAR XC TRAIL. SO I BOUGHT SOME HD TIRES
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
eric
a Cross Country Rider
from hennicker nh usa Date Reviewed: February 25, 2003
Favorite Trail:
any
Duration Product Used:
2 Years
Price Paid:
$35.00
Strengths:
great race tire on single track.
Weaknesses:
sidewalls give before knobs
Similar Products Used:
xc fires
Bike Setup:
litespeed,xtr,crossmaxs,thomson,sl carbon,time
Bottom Line:
these are super great tires for racing ,one of lightes .but if you are not lite must go to 2.1 if you do not 1.8 tires will be destroy.used as race tire.sidewalls go, but you have to give something for weight.use 2.1 for all around .found xc fire to rip faster on sidewalls then these tires.if race is going to be super muddy keep 2.1 on.most people run 1.8 everywere and this why they have slippage.they need to use one or other depending on cond.over all good tire if you have the correct air in them for the wieght of rider.i am 140lbs i used 45lbs of presure that seems to work best for me..
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
mark
a Cross Country Rider
from col hghts,va,usa Date Reviewed: February 8, 2003
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$27.00
Purchased At:
jenson usa
Strengths:
traction,ride,looks,price,
Weaknesses:
dont like to have to change pressure for new conditions
Similar Products Used:
tioga,wtb(many),vittoria
Bike Setup:
diamondback xts-3
Bottom Line:
i put these on today and hit the street at 50psi.they were great!i decided to hit the sloppiest trail i knew and they hooked up surprisingly well.the first climb bit but i lowered the psi to45.WOW they gripped great,cornered very well stopped how i needed,and with the sticky and soupy mud they shed better than any tire ive ridden.the biggest surprise has been the traction in this slop of a trail.thats why i rode it,fully expecting to have many failures due to conditions.bottom line im not sure how well they do in ideal conditions but they were phenominal under extreme mud,sand water,roots,wet leaves,andjust all around,nastycold riding.would do it again and pay more if needed
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Phil Baumann
a Cross Country Rider
from Casper, WY, USA Date Reviewed: February 5, 2003
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$36.00
Purchased At:
LBS
Strengths:
Fast, fairly light
Weaknesses:
Cornering. Aren't a true 2.1
Similar Products Used:
Fire XC, Various Continental and Specialized
Bike Setup:
2000 Truth
Bottom Line:
Probably a good race tire. I haven't had any problems with wear. For most trail riders the Fire Xc is abetter choice. I am going back to them this year. For racers they would probably rate a 4, for trail riders I give them a 2.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Misha
a Cross Country Rider
from Malaysia Date Reviewed: December 19, 2002
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$20.00
Purchased At:
LBS
Strengths:
Lightweight, low rolling resistance, good grip on wet pavement.
Weaknesses:
Non so far but a bit worried about the soft side walls, so far no flat, no snake bites
Similar Products Used:
Hutchinson mosquito (stay away from these)
Bike Setup:
Giant XTCSE3
Bottom Line:
I would buy them again infact I'm really gonna get another pair just incase my lbs run out of stock next time.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Lionel Gendreau
a Weekend Warrior
from Calgary, Canada Date Reviewed: October 31, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Kananaskis Country
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$42.00
Purchased At:
MEC
Strengths:
After researching various tires I picked up a couple of 2.5 Kevlars. They are much narrower than other 2.5's I have used, and very lite. Typically I do urban assault, mountain trails, fire roads, and some technical stuff. The Trailblasters have handled very well in all conditions which includes mud, leaves, and snow. They are fast, and inspired confidence in all terrain except sand, they were average in mud. I am quite happy with these tires and would not hesitate to purchase another pair. A couple of days ago I took them out on snow and ice covered city pathways (30 km's), it was a nice ride despite the cold. For CDN riders, MEC (Mountain Equipment Co-op) seemed to have the best prices and they do mail order.
Weaknesses:
The front tire had difficulty holding air, was not sure what the story was or if it has been remedied.
Similar Products Used:
Michelin
Bike Setup:
Rocky Mountain Element Race
Bottom Line:
They are lite, look good, have nice handling characteristics in most conditions, and were more economical than most other kelvar tires. I would recommend these for all weekend warriors. Racers may want to consider something more aggressive.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
string
a Cross Country Rider
from houston, TX Date Reviewed: October 22, 2002
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$25.00
Purchased At:
Cambria
Strengths:
Light, low rolling resitance
Weaknesses:
Thin Sidewall
Similar Products Used:
Specialized Tires
Bike Setup:
Stumpjumpre Pro FSR, Race Face, King, XTR, Stans NoTubes
Bottom Line:
Overall I have been happy with these tires. They are light for a 2.1 and hook up well. I do not feel like I am going to wash out when cornering with the Trailblasters. My only two complaints are they don't shed mud very well and they are not the best on steep short climbs. However, it is an all around tire which usually means a few sacrafices for the versatility.
I am running Stans NoTubes kit with the Trailblasters. The front tire has worked perfect. I can run 30-35 PSI and have not added sealent in 3 months. The rear tire did not handle Stans as well. I got a punture in the tread on the 2nd ride and the sealant would not seal the hole. Additionally, the side wall has become much looser since running tubeless. I have had to run tubes on the rear tire since.
Overall, this is a very good all around XC tire.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Tim
a Racer
from Grand Forks, ND Date Reviewed: October 20, 2002
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$19.00
Purchased At:
Colorado Cyclist
Strengths:
Weight (light, around 520 g). Hooks up well in most conditions (moderate mud and loose surfaces). Low rolling resistance.
Weaknesses:
Not a real aggressive tread.
Similar Products Used:
Kenda Klimax, Maxxis Mobster, IRC Mythos, Continental Explorer Pro
Bike Setup:
Trek Fuel 100, bottom bracket and seat post are only stock parts left on bike.
Bottom Line:
This is a good tire for cross country riding/racing. It hooks up well in moderate conditions. By this I mean that VERY greasy and/or muddy race conditions are not ideal for this tire. And if you know of a tire this is good for these conditions and is not relatively heavy, let me know! For hard pack and tacky course conditions this tire does not have enough knobs. I have not ridden the tire much on pavement, so I cannot comment on the longevity problems that some have mentioned. Overall it is worth a try if you want a fairly light 2.1 inch tire without sacrificing a lot in traction as you would with the Kenda Klimax.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Bernie Brown
a Cross Country Rider
from Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Date Reviewed: October 2, 2002
Favorite Trail:
any
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$55.00
Purchased At:
The Bike People
Strengths:
Light;looks cool; decent grip
Weaknesses:
Sidewall??
Similar Products Used:
IRC, Specialized, Panaracer Smoke
Bike Setup:
M2 Sworks, XTR/XT, MOnkeylites, Selle Italia Trans Am, Bontrager/XTR wheels
Bottom Line:
Purchased the tire for rear of my bike on Aug 5th, put 450 kms of basically dirt road riding with a few trails thrown in - nothing major. Stopped for a water break on Sept 13th on a well travelled dirt road that my riding buddy and I were cruising on when my friend looks at my rear tire and asks " What the hell is that on your tire?" I look down and there is a crack that starts at one of the edge knobs and then forks down the sidewall to the bead. I am totally pissed at this - I have travelled these roads on all kinds of crappy, worn out tires and have never blown a tire. This thing costs $55 + taxes - here in Nova Scotia that means add 15% = $64 for this tire and should stand up to this type of driving - maybe it is a street tire in a knobby (somewhat knobby) disguise. I bought the 1.95 kevlar beaded redwall tire and I think some of the problem with the tire is that the sidewall is wider than the tread and sticks out past the tread of the tire, thus exposing it to whatever is there to puncture it - have a look at one installed and pumped up - you can actually see the sidewalls bulging past the tread part of the tire even at the 42 lbs that I run in my tires.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Chris
a Cross Country Rider
from Vail, CO Date Reviewed: September 12, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Two Elk
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$25.00
Purchased At:
LBS
Strengths:
Fast
Weaknesses:
Low traction, small bead
Bike Setup:
Turner XCE,XT,XTR,Thomson, Chris King
Bottom Line:
This is a very fast tire. It works well in semi-technical, flat terrain. If you are a racer looking for a finesse tire this is it. If you are an all around rider look for something with a little more traction. This tire made me lose confidence in the handling ability of my bike. Which made be in the back of the pack.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Matt Donnelly
a Cross Country Rider
from Aspen, CO Date Reviewed: September 6, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Some trail in CB near Taylor Resevoir, can't remember the name
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Purchased At:
Wrench Science
Strengths:
LIGHT, Low RR
Weaknesses:
thin
Similar Products Used:
Fire XC Pro
Bike Setup:
Titus HCR, SRAM XO, RaceFace Crankset, Eggbeaters
Bottom Line:
I ordered Fire XC Pros with my new ride and got these instead. At first I didn't think they's dig going uphill, but they weren't too bad with my new Hard Tail
They do what they're supposed to do: roll easily. I have to run them at super low pressure to get them to grip going up and down hills.
DO NOT RECOMMEND non-UST model FOR STAN'S NOTUBES!!!
I Semi-followed install instructions and was able to get air to hold. However these tires are way too thin to run tubless. The only thing that saved my ass was the liquid latex that held the seal.
I pinch flatted, and that was stopped by the latex. Then the tire completely blew out from the rim on a rocky technical section. I was kind of cool to see out the corner of my eye. The tire was visibly separated from the rim briefly, then resealed.
Quit yer whining if you're trying to run these thru mud and water. It's obvious they aren't the strongest in these conditions. Might as well bust out your ten speed for a dual slalom race.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Dinesh Rajan
a
from Selangor, Malaysia Date Reviewed: August 4, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Urban, Trails, Dirt Jumping
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$19.00
Purchased At:
Bike Shop
Strengths:
Looks stylish. Light. Good for urban assaults because traction is little. Durable.
Weaknesses:
Very poor when it comes to traction. I think it is caused by the beads of the tires for they're too small. Tires are a little too thin.
Similar Products Used:
IRC Mythos, Tioga Factory XC.
Bottom Line:
Overall it is only an average tire. Good for Dirt Jumping & Urban Assaults. Bad for offroad riding. Traction is very little.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
BRYAN
a Cross Country Rider
from FAIRFAX,VA,USA Date Reviewed: July 20, 2002
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Strengths:
FAST...FAST...FAST.. ON HARD DIRT
Weaknesses:
NONE
Bike Setup:
TREK 6700
Bottom Line:
FAST, LOOKS GREAT, HOOK-UP ON THE SOFT STUFF.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Steven
a Cross Country Rider
from Canada Date Reviewed: July 18, 2002
Favorite Trail:
TNT
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
plenty of warning before it will wash out on corners
Weaknesses:
Flats! Flats! Flats! Poor durability Not a 2.1 A poor mud tire
Similar Products Used:
Maxxis, Panaracer, Vredestien
Bike Setup:
Hardtail
Bottom Line:
I thought these tires were great for the first month. Then the flats started coming. I'm not talking about pinch flats either. I started getting a flat every other ride and it is really frustrating. I finally took them off and discovered that the casing and rubber is really thin. I guess that is how they keep the weight down. I ride the forests of northern Canada and these tires are just not suited to this terrain. I would also recommend finding a different tire if you ride wet trails.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
gazbins
a Weekend Warrior
from Kinver, staffs Date Reviewed: July 16, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Afan Argoed
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$35.00
Purchased At:
Bike Bristol
Strengths:
roll fast, light, grips rock, loves gravel, can run them low pressure, no pinch flats
Weaknesses:
messy on wet clay and mud, but that's what they are for!
Similar Products Used:
Tioga XC - OK all rounder. Tioga Mud - fantastic up Leigh Woods, Bristol. Specialized dirt control/master - useless for the UK
Bike Setup:
Kona 2001, Raceface Turbine, RaceFace ISIS BB, RF Bars, Koski Stem, Atom Lab rims, Hope Bulbs, Hope Mini's, DMR saddle , XT mech, cassette and chain
Bottom Line:
These tyres are sound on Welsh tracks such as Afan Argoed and Coed-y-Brennin. They just love rocks, roots, slate, gravel you name it.
They are fast and corner well with their round profile, however this means that they are fairly lame on mud and braking.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
K. G.
a Weekend Warrior
from Malaysia Date Reviewed: July 13, 2002
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$15.00
Purchased At:
Bikeshop
Strengths:
Weight and price
Weaknesses:
Traction on sand
Similar Products Used:
Nothing
Bottom Line:
Quite a good tyre for the price
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Peter Fuller
a Cross Country Rider
from Stockport, UK Date Reviewed: July 12, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Dolgellau Circuit
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$30.00
Purchased At:
Chain Reaction
Strengths:
Very light. Red sides. Super rolling.
Weaknesses:
None
Similar Products Used:
Fires XC
Bike Setup:
Marin Alpine Trail
Bottom Line:
Riders who like the Fire XC's will not like these. But they are superb at what they are supposed to do, roll well. If you like the XC's but your riding calls for better rolling these are the best, they fit the bill. A lot of reviews are trying to rate them for something they are not designed to be, I mean just look at the tread, obviously you will need to make allowances. No tyre ever made or probably ever will be will answer every terrain thrown at it. Rock, sand, mud, hardpack, tarmac, grass. All comes down to personal choice on how you want your tyres to feel for you. Don't rate tyres for something they not designed to do. These even have a warning on them not to use in winter conditions, I'll put the Fires back on then! I've rated these on what they are designed for and how they match that design, which is 100%, the same as I give Fires for what they are designed for.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Chad
a Racer
from Park City, UT Date Reviewed: June 28, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Gooseberry Mesa
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Low rolling resistance, weight.
Weaknesses:
Poor cornering and breaking
Similar Products Used:
Fire XC Pro
Bike Setup:
Rocky Mountain Element Team SC. Avid Ulitmate Single Digit Breaks, Spinergy Xcyclone Race wheelset, Race Face cranks and BB. XTR shifters and derailleurs.
Bottom Line:
I used the Fire XC Pro all last year and loved it. Thought I would give the new Trailblaster a try due to the weight savings over the XC Pro. The Trailblaster has very low rolling resistance over the XC Pro, which has been great, but not sure if it's worth loosing the breaking power and cornering capability of the XC Pro. I guess you just have to figure out which characteristics are important for your riding. I think if your looking for a good overall tire, there are better choices out there. But if you want to save some weight, the Trailblaster can help you with that.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
ICEAXE
a Cross Country Rider
from Ann Arbor, Mi Date Reviewed: June 27, 2002
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Strengths:
Light for 2.1, less than average rolling resistance for a knobby
Weaknesses:
Zero conrnering ability, wears out quickly-->They just don't inspire any real confidence at speed.
Similar Products Used:
Fire XC pro 2.1
Bike Setup:
C'dale Jekyll 900
Bottom Line:
I've used semi slicks that roll and corner better. Traction on climbs is average, but I have to run lower than the recomended pressure to get it. I agree with guy below me, the Fire XC pro is a far superior tire. I just have to figure what to do with these crappy treads.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Eddie
a Cross Country Rider
from Norcross, GA Date Reviewed: June 27, 2002
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$15.00
Purchased At:
colorado cyclist
Strengths:
Looks Cool. Very Light.
Weaknesses:
Everything else!
Similar Products Used:
Panaracer Fire XC, IRC Mythos XC, Specialized (various).
Bike Setup:
SC Superlight, Full XTR, Hayes Disc, XFly 100.
Bottom Line:
The tire performed well the first time I rode on them. After that, my bike kept losing traction. It was almost scary how fast I lost all traction abilities. The rear tire just spins on climbs. Plus, if you are riding in the mud, forget it. The Fire XC is far better tire than the Trailblaster. I just ordered another set of FIRE XC for my bike to replace these awful tires.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Russell Hall
a Cross Country Rider
from Staffordshire, England Date Reviewed: June 20, 2002
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$80.00
Purchased At:
Phil Corley Cycles
Strengths:
Light, ride well, wicked over the rocks. I have the 1.8 versions, they ride beautifully and I haven't any problems in the mud yet.
Weaknesses:
None really, these tires are good, they have done everything I want them to, including a week in the Lake District over all sorts of terrain.
Similar Products Used:
Most panaracers, Specialized's Team controls, WTB velociraptors, Continentals cross country tirs and semislicks...
I reckon these tirs are brilliant, I have no problems using them at all. I don't think I'd use them in the winter but I have winter tires anyway. Buy these tires and you won't regret it!!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Howard Aitchison
a Cross Country Rider
from Biggleswade Date Reviewed: June 19, 2002
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Purchased At:
Mail Order
Strengths:
Light, low rolling resistance.
Weaknesses:
The wet. These tyres have NO grip if it starts raining.
Similar Products Used:
Various Continental (my favourites), Mitchelin Wildgripper, Panracer Smoke & Dart.
Bike Setup:
Klein Pulse Race, Rockshocks Duke fork, Mavic rims laced to Hope hubs.
Bottom Line:
I have already ditched mine. Do not buy these if you ever ride in the wet, they wash-out on the corners and under braking in a very scary way. Straight-line speed is not enough on my local trails, I need control and I simply do not have the confidence in these tyres necessary to let rip.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Phil Van Ornum
a Cross Country Rider
from Sunnyvale Date Reviewed: June 4, 2002
Favorite Trail:
any singletrack
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$35.00
Purchased At:
pricepoint
Strengths:
Good hookup, nice feel in cornering slow wear, great side knobs
Weaknesses:
Product did as mentioned before the center starts ripping. Rode tire for 4 month started flatting, returned for a new and in 2 months the same pattern has started again. Not worth the suprise flat. To bad it is a good tire
Similar Products Used:
Fire xc, wtb moto, continental vert, micheln wildgripper
Bike Setup:
Canandale jekyll
Bottom Line:
Good tire but the wear issue is a huge drawback. Would not purchase again unless resolved
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Mauro
a Cross Country Rider
from Ticino, Switzerland Date Reviewed: May 24, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Arbostora
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$45.00
Purchased At:
local shop
Strengths:
1.8" very light, rolling resistance, good braking on dry terrain.
Weaknesses:
Wear out quickly, treads at the back are flats after 300km. On the front some treads rip off. Gets flat easly. Poor cornering.
Similar Products Used:
Panaracer's, Ritchey's, Geax's, Nokian's and many others
Bike Setup:
GT Lts, CrossMax wheels
Bottom Line:
It's a shame that such an expensive race tire don't last longer. A friend has the same tires with the same result !!! Maybe all that happends because the size, I think 1.95" is better and has more advantage by cornering, wear and punctures resistance. I'm more happy with the XC Fire 2.1" type.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Theran Martin
a Cross Country Rider
from Colorado Springs Date Reviewed: May 19, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Pipeline
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$26.00
Purchased At:
pricepoint
Strengths:
great tread pattern, awesome on anything even loose stuff, i was very impressed because My favorite trail is very loose and I killed it with these tires
Weaknesses:
none so far
Similar Products Used:
Fire XC pros
Bike Setup:
2001 Stumpjumper M4 Avid mechs, Race Face Turbines, Rhyno Lite XL's, All XT components, 2002 Duke SL, Monkey Lite low rise, Thomson Elite post
Bottom Line:
Buy them if you wnt a sweet tire. I ran the XC pros forever but now i will go with the these. The XC was great as well but u can tell a difference from the get go with these. They handled awesome in loose gravel, ( and yes they still slid a little but if you can tell me a tire that is not as big as a motorcycle tire that doesnt i will ride it), turns, hardpack, mud, hell everything! My favorite trail is filled with every condition and they ate the damn trail up!! BUY THEM in 2.1 and you wont be dissapointed!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Marcel Lopez
a Cross Country Rider
from Puerto Rico Date Reviewed: May 2, 2002
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$37.00
Purchased At:
Ciclomundo
Strengths:
Fast Rolling. light, only 500g. cool looks. all surface tires. very sticy.
Weaknesses:
none so far.
Similar Products Used:
hutchinson pythons
Bike Setup:
Trek 4300. XT deraulliers. Raceface seatpost, handlebar and grips. Time pedals, trailblaster tires, bontrager superstock rims, selle italia pro link saddle, avid arch rival brakes, lx cranks and levers, manitou magnum forksram powerglide 7.0 cassette, sram pc-69 chain, bontrager race stem.
Bottom Line:
since i have used this tires just a couple of rides i can say they are durable but i can say that they are the best xc tires i've used in terms of handling, and overall performance. buy them if you are looking for a xc all surface tires.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
David
a Cross Country Rider
from TN Date Reviewed: May 1, 2002
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
It works well when the conditions are perfect -- not too dry, not damp, mostly hardpack. The kind of conditions where my Schwinn Stingray slick from 30 years ago would also work -- and any other tire on the market.
Weaknesses:
If it's damp, wet, or heaven forgive muddy, this is the worst tire I've every used. It chatters on anything loose over hardpack. Slick on big rocks.
Similar Products Used:
Many Specialized tires (many of which I loved, but they keep changing patterns), Continentals, others
Bike Setup:
Stumpjumper FSR Pro
Bottom Line:
When the conditions are perfect (when any tire would work), these are good tires. In any other condition, ridding on rims with no tire would be about the same, minus a little cushion. Whoever decided to market these as "all around tires" smokes crack and pulls practical jokes for a living.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Earthpig
a Cross Country Rider
from Boise Date Reviewed: April 25, 2002
Duration Product Used:
1 Year
Price Paid:
$25.00
Purchased At:
pricepoint.com
Strengths:
Light Durable looks cool fast on hardpack
Weaknesses:
not as grippy as the Fire XC
Similar Products Used:
Fire XC IRC Mythos various Specialized tires Bontrager Jones
Bike Setup:
Gunnar Rockhound (geared) and steel singlespeed
Bottom Line:
I bought this tire (1.95 size) for the rear of my geared bike after I wore out a Panaracer Fire XC pro in Moab last year. I can't believe what a good mix of low weight, grippy-ness, and low rolling resistance this thing has. I put 1200 miles on one rear tire last year. Earlier this year I swapped it out for a 2.1 Fire XC pro, which feels really heavy and slow in comparison. To make a long story short, I just bought another Trailblaster - anyone want a used Fire XC pro?? Spendy, but great all-around tire.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Shawn
a Cross Country Rider
from Singapore Date Reviewed: April 9, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Bukit Timah
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$35.00
Purchased At:
Hup Leong
Strengths:
Good grip when cornering at high speed, relatively light for a 2.1" tire. climbs well at lower end of pressure range (below 40 psi). durability is not too bad. rolling resistance is quite low at max pressure, despite the tire width
Weaknesses:
poor grip when braking, front tire can skid on dry hardpack under straight line braking. poor climbing at higher pressures. for the 1.8" it is prone to pinch flats at pressures below 40 psi. snake bite chafer not doing job =P
Similar Products Used:
Not many, old kendas and some unbranded tires. had short jaunts on wtb motoraptors, fire XC pros...
Bike Setup:
01 NRS 3
Bottom Line:
This is my 2nd review, as a follow up on the 1st review and to review the 2.1 inch tire. basically the 1.8" should be regarded as a semislick and used as such. climbing on slippery steep hills on the 1.8 requires a certain skill level which i have yet to attain, i usually make it up with lot's of wheelspin, if i do clear the hill.
the 2.1" is better for trails, and rocks on the descents! corners well too. jam the front brake and have a surprise, u either endo or the front skids like mad... interesting...
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Jon
a Racer
from Central PA Date Reviewed: March 29, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Tussey Ridge
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$20.00
Purchased At:
Nashbar
Strengths:
Light - 520 grams in 2.1" Great grip, but low rolling resistance Sheds mud really well
Weaknesses:
skinny for a 2.1"
Similar Products Used:
Pythons, Mosquitos, FireXCPros, Team Master/Control, Mythos Slick.
Bike Setup:
Cr-Mo hardtail, XTR/SRAM, Mars-1, Cane Creek Cronos.
Bottom Line:
Another great all-around tire, even better than the Fire. After some great rides on a pair of Stradius tires, I wanted to see how the rubber worked off-road. $40 later, and I'm impressed. I'm used to Pythons and Mosquitos, which tend to under-state width, but these are pretty optimistic. The 2.1's are more like 1.95 mounted and inflated, and are easily half an inch shorter than Pythons. However, they roll very fast over anything, and still grip amazingly well. Cornering, even through loose stuff, or over sticks and rocks, is a breeze. Mud is thrown off before it collects, and while deep sand is still ugly, that's more tire size than anything else. Compared to the Fires, these are at least 50% better. I never liked the cornering of the Fires - they don't give enough feedback, and I've washed out a few times due to this. The TB's give plenty of feedback, and more importantly, they corner great. I actually pushed them today, expecting to go down, and didn't. They drifted a few inches through loose dirt, but held. For East Coast racing, these are a safe choice no matter what the weather's been like, and on a FS bike, they'd be even better. They don't have the float of higher volume tires, but they're worth it.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Chado
a Weekend Warrior
from Australia Date Reviewed: March 20, 2002
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Strengths:
roll fast, long lasting.
Weaknesses:
rear centre knobs should be ramped steeper for more bite.
Similar Products Used:
MAXXIS Mofo,Krakken,Mobster,Calibos,Harddrive
Bike Setup:
Intense Tracer Works Burger with the lot.(hold the onion)
Bottom Line:
Tried to destroy these tyres over sharp rocks but not a scratch. I'm really impressed how fast they roll on the road and the tyre compound seams to grip ok even on with loose small rocks over hardpack. But they arn't 2.1. More like 1.95. Expected them to be fatter. Panaracer should pump out some 2.25 then I'll be grinning like a mud crab. Think these will last a long time but I think the rear should have steeper center knobs for more bite when climbing.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
smokin joe
a Racer
from mountain home ark Date Reviewed: March 15, 2002
Favorite Trail:
nunya
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$27.00
Purchased At:
LBS
Strengths:
Durability, lite weight
Weaknesses:
none
Similar Products Used:
most out there
Bike Setup:
Fuel 98 FS
Bottom Line:
I must have got lucky as im unable to beleive the durability of this tire. When i first saw this tire and looked at its weight i thought theres no way this tire will hold out longer than a month. Its been three months riding hard over flint rock infested hills. Not one single torn knobby. I feel that there might be a conspiracy w/ the tire manufacturers. I bought this tire as soon as it was advertised, and others ive bought like this have also held up well. However, after the product hits the market full force the tires seem to be of inferior craftsmenship. It's like the company produces jam up tires first to get the public hooked, then start releasing weaker rubber. I wish i would have known this tire was going to be a rocker and i would have bought four.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Barry
a Cross Country Rider
from Acton Ca Date Reviewed: March 4, 2002
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$26.00
Purchased At:
Pricepoint
Strengths:
I'm thinking---- oh ya ! there pretty narrow for a 2.1
Weaknesses:
BRAKING !!!
Similar Products Used:
Specialized Team Control and Master
Bike Setup:
Cannondale Raven 2000SL
Bottom Line:
I have been running the Specialized tires on both my Hardtail and my Full Suspension and have been pretty happy. But I thought I would try these out based on the reviews I've read on this page.Climbing is good,corning is fair,(but just don't put your brakes on).I was scared sh#$%%% when I was decending down the hill.I tried lowering the tire pressure to 40psi but these tires would NOT HOOK UP!!. The hole rear end would slide out from under me.Ive taken this trail with my other tires with no problem at all.I DO NOT RECOMMEND THESE TIRES if you use your brakes.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Warren Anthony
a Weekend Warrior
from Redhill Date Reviewed: March 4, 2002
Favorite Trail:
cut gate path
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Price Paid:
$60.00
Purchased At:
Finch & Sons, Reigate
Strengths:
Superb traction, good cornering grip, light weight and easy to fit by hand. The best dry weather tyre I've used.
Weaknesses:
Not great at shedding thick North-Downs mud. Can be a bit unpredictable in the wet and in very loose conditions. I've only used the 2.1 so maybe others are better here.
Similar Products Used:
Specialized Team Control
Bike Setup:
01 Specialized Rockhopper comp
Bottom Line:
2.1 version is an unbelievably good tyre, particularly in dry conditions. Soooo light and also easy to fit and remove.
I've had some problems with them in the wet - they can get a little bit unpredictable.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Kevin
a Racer
from Seattle Date Reviewed: February 26, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Any
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$30.00
Purchased At:
Performance
Strengths:
-Light weight -Looks cool
Weaknesses:
-No durability -Tears down the middle
Similar Products Used:
WTB, Ritchey, IRC
Bike Setup:
Yeti, XTR....
Bottom Line:
I bought these with high expectations. I thought it would be great saving about 100 grams per tire over some of the other brands I have tried. At first, they worked great on all but very loose gravel where they seem to stray a bit.
My hopes were suddenly dashed when after about a month of use, the fell apart. Not just the rear but the front tire as well. I ride off road about 90% of the time but in this case, I was on a paved path doing about 15 MPH when I felt this bump coming from the front tire. I stopped and looked and there was nothing possible I could have hit (remember, I'm on black top) but as I looked closely at the front tire, I noticed it was ripping apart in the middle. The white cords were shining through.
It wasn't more than a few miles later on the ride back home that I flatted in the front due to this "wonderful" tire. I thought it was probably a fluke until the back tire did the exact same thing a few rides later.
The only thing I can say is that you are better off spending your money elsewhere.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Chris
a Cross Country Rider
from NJ Date Reviewed: February 9, 2002
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$30.00
Purchased At:
Pricepoint.com
Strengths:
Great Traction Nice Corners Look Great On/Off Road Comapatability
Weaknesses:
Not The Lightest Thing Around Tight Bead(not good for trail-side flats)
Similar Products Used:
Panaracer Fire Xc Pro; Bontrager Jones C; Michelin CompS
Bike Setup:
2000 Moab 3; Xt/Lx Set Up; 2002 Duke SL
Bottom Line:
GREAT TIRE! I had the Fire Xc Pros on before the purchase of these tires. I was a little sceptacle about getting the Trailblaster instead of the Fire Xc Pro. WOW, am I glad I switched. Don't get me wrong, the Xc Pro was a great tire for cornering and it was fast...but it just felt a little mushy, so I upgraded. I havn't had a single problem yet(except it took me 20 minutes to get the friggan thigns on with the tight bead). The main reason I got the tire was because MTBR gave it good reviews. Anyone serious about Xc riding/racing, should get the tire. I don't race but I still want my bike to perform well, and these tires enhanced my riding alot. GO FOR THE TRAILBLASTER!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Chris
a Cross Country Rider
from Leeds West Yorkshire England Date Reviewed: February 8, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Grizedale Forest,Lake District
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$35.00
Purchased At:
Noahs Ark,Stroud Glos.
Strengths:
Low resistance on tarmac,incredible traction in the dirt.
Weaknesses:
None as yet
Similar Products Used:
Specialized Team Control/Team Master Specialized Rockster
Bike Setup:
Specialized Rockhopper A1 FSR Comp,Hope Mini Disc Brakes Hope Sport XC hubs and Mavic F519 Rims
Bottom Line:
Not far from where I live there is a really nasty technical climb,not too steep but slippery loose rocks make it a nightmare.I have had 5 previous attempts to climb this and have only managed it once,with the Trailblasters fitted! I am running the 2.1 folding version,they are very light weight and are awesome on or off road.I would recommend these for any rider seriously into XC riding/racing or for people who just plod around their local trails.Buy it!!!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
smokinjoe
a Racer
from mtn home, ark usa Date Reviewed: February 3, 2002
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$29.00
Purchased At:
Bikes and Things Inc.
Strengths:
Durability, great knob pattern.
Weaknesses:
none yet
Similar Products Used:
all of them
Bike Setup:
Trek OCLV HC,Trek Fuel
Bottom Line:
Great surprising tire. Ive abused this tire over rocks and more rocks. I gave this tire about a month to live w/ this terrain here. It has astounded me, absolutely tough. Gotta buy some more!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Tim Tidball
a Cross Country Rider
from Medford Date Reviewed: January 28, 2002
Favorite Trail:
Wagner Creek
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$27.00
Purchased At:
Jenson USA
Strengths:
Weight, sheds mud well, looks (good ol' black tire w/out ugly-colored sidewalls), and most of all traction.
Weaknesses:
none!
Similar Products Used:
Panaracer Fire xc's, Bontrager Jones, Specialized master/control, Maxxis mimo's (1.9)
Bike Setup:
Specialized Stumpjumper w/upgrades
Bottom Line:
I took these tires the some of the worst conditions I've ever rode... mud, snow, rocks, ruts, etc. they hooked up great, and shed mud extremely well. The mud around this area is like clay, it sticks to your bike like cement, I was surprised how the mud didn't stick and "gum" up on the tires. These are absolutely the best tires I've used.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Matt James
a Cross Country Rider
from St. Louis, MO Date Reviewed: January 15, 2002
Favorite Trail:
chubb & its spurs
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$40.00
Purchased At:
Big Shark
Strengths:
Rolls fast for such big lugs Feel soft Hook up quite well
Weaknesses:
Some wash out onleaves in the corners at high speeds, but what do you expect?
Similar Products Used:
Michelin, irc NOTOS, Fire
Bike Setup:
CAAD2 with XT/XTR mix, Mavic 517 on XTR, Easton bar, thomson post, italia gel saddle, avid ti brakes
Bottom Line:
I've used these tires for a little over three months now and I love them. I got them at the beginning of the inclement weather in st louis and they have performed admirably in mud, ice, rocks and roots. I was riding some 1.9 michies before this and the sheer difference in volume (my trailblasters are 2.1) has made a huge difference in my riding. The big knobs seem to hold on better in the loose river valley conditions that surround my home than did the small, skinny knobs on the michelins. I was surprised that they roll as fast as they do, being as knobby as they are but i suppose the much hyped "multi-step" knob does its job. the only time these have failed me (i use the word "fail" very loosely here) is cornering on leaf covered ground. I believe that this is characteristic of most tires, so i could not call it a fault. the rear tire has always held on in even the loosest of climbs, so i'm a believer in these tires. I've recently discovered that mavic's 517 rim can be converted to tubeless (talk to your LBS), so i'm considering the tubeless version of these tires when the tubed ones wear out. I'd also like to see a tubeless version in the 2.1 size,time will tell.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Brad
a Racer
from Charlotte, NC Date Reviewed: December 7, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Catawba (aka Slammin Sammy's)
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$60.00
Purchased At:
Bicycles East
Strengths:
Light Good all-conditions tire Looks schweet Long tread life
Weaknesses:
Tight bead, it will take longer to put back on if you go flat(which will cost if it happenes in a race)
I made a big mistake and bought the 1.95's to save a little weight. I normally ride 2.1's and think it would be well worth the weight sacrifice to go with the 2.1's. I weigh 170 and just dont have the confidence on the skinnys, they dont corner as well and tend to bounce around significantly more. I usually ride with 38-40 psi but have found that the skinnys require about 45+ psi. Every time I go with lower pressure I flat out and find the hole right at the valve, I am guessing that the tire is pulling off the rim causing the tube to rip at the valve and I have checked the rim. The ride is just too harsh at 45+ psi so I went back to the Fire XC 2.1's. I would buy this tire in a 2.1! My shop just cant keep em in stock.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Moe
a Weekend Warrior
from Weston, FL, U.S.A Date Reviewed: December 3, 2001
Favorite Trail:
oleta and markham
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$25.00
Purchased At:
jenson
Strengths:
looks bad ass, unbelievable traction on roots and rocks( especially the roots at oleta) Never slowed me down a bit. great on the corners thanks to the big knobs on the edges.
Weaknesses:
none yet
Similar Products Used:
Bontrager jones ac
Bike Setup:
trek fuel 90 2002- stock
Bottom Line:
Bad ass tires. I ran over the same crap that blew out my piece of crap jones ac and nothing happened but a grin. What a difference in the ride. Best improvement yet.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
John
a Weekend Warrior
from Brooklyn, NY Date Reviewed: November 5, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Stillwell, Rocky Point
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$26.00
Purchased At:
Pricepoint.com
Strengths:
This is a review of the 1.9 Panaracer (not UST). Light, sheds mud well, fast rolling.
Weaknesses:
Not really a weakness but - 460grams as stated above??? On the package it states that it weights 500 grams.
Similar Products Used:
Specialized Mt. Baldy 1.9 , Specialized Ground control 1.9, WTB Velociarator 2.1, Continental Vertical pro 2.3.
Bike Setup:
2000 Specialized FSR XC s-works with race face next LP cranks and trailblaster 1.9 tires. Easton CT2 lower riser carbon bars. Everything else stock.
Bottom Line:
This is a review of the 1.9 trailblasters. I almost got the 2.1's. I went for the 1.9 because of the less rolling resistance. My previous tires were 2.1 WTB Velociarator great tires but a bit slower. Anyway, I'm pleasantly surprized and pleased with the results of this tire on the conditions that I ride on - Rocky, rooty, sandy, muddy and hardpack. I'm 175 lbs and run them at 40psi. If anybody has been to Stillwell in Syoset, you would know that trial has a little bit of everything. The tire can hang under all these conditions. If you're a weight weenie like me, go for this tire. I'm happy with it.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Walter Teoh
a Cross Country Rider
from SP, Kedah, Malayisa Date Reviewed: November 4, 2001
Favorite Trail:
anywhere offroad
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Purchased At:
Soo Beng Trading
Strengths:
Look good and lasting
Weaknesses:
weight not as same like mention on their homepage, havier than mention. and expensive $$
Similar Products Used:
many
Bike Setup:
S work M4 hardtail 2001
Bottom Line:
Good tyre, well in slipply condition. best tyre ever tried. but why the weight is not same like mention on thier homepage? roll fast, may friends used it and very happy with it
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Rick
a Cross Country Rider
from Phoenixville, PA Date Reviewed: November 1, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Red/White - French Creek
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$45.00
Purchased At:
Bean's Bikes
Strengths:
Weight, traction, overall performance
Weaknesses:
Difficult to mount, a bit narrow, high minimum pressure
Similar Products Used:
(Tubeless)Hutchinson Python, Michelin Comp S, (Tube)Panaracer Fire XC Pro
The bead was much tighter than other tubeless tires I've tried, making it a real b&tch to mount. 1-2mm of extra room wouldn't hurt a bit.
The minimum recommended pressure is 35 PSI, which somewhat negates the benefits of tubeless, particularly on a narrow tire such as this 1.95. I would either redesign to allow running at 30 PSI and/or come out with a 2.1 version of the Trailblaster tubeless.
As a result, it rides a bit harsh compared to the Pythons, which I like a lot.
Price is also a bit high, but I can understand that given the lower sales volumes of UST tires these days.
On the plus side, although, traction is excellent thus far, both laterally and climbing (better sidehill grip than the Pythons, for sure). It is fall here, and with a deep leaf cover, I wanted something with teeth. This is the best choice right now.
Overall, a good start that could use some refinement.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Shawn
a Cross Country Rider
from Singapore Date Reviewed: October 31, 2001
Favorite Trail:
BT trail, Pulau Ubin
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$20.00
Purchased At:
LBS
Strengths:
LIGHT!! Panaracer claims it's 400 grams (mine's the 1.8" trailblaster). This has improved pickup tremendously. I find the rolling resistance lower than other wider knobblies, despite the buzzing sound. I've heard that it sheds mud damn well, which is a boon for the wet conditions in Singapore.
Weaknesses:
On certain types of wet pavement, it's a very dangerous tyre. A light touch of the front brake will lock the front wheel, so imagine how conering would be like. Still, this is an off-road tyre, but u will definitely encounter pavement on your way to the trail...
Similar Products Used:
5 year old Kendas which came stock on my bike.
Bike Setup:
Cheapo Alu hardtail.
Bottom Line:
Well, this tyre is actually considered quite expensive where I live, so only 4 peppers 4 the value, but if u consider the rotational weight savings, it's quite a good deal. To me, it's almost like a semislick that can perform well in wet slippery condition off-road. Weight weenies out there, I say grab the 1.8" Trailblasters!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Chris Keefer
a Racer
from north branford, ct usa Date Reviewed: October 25, 2001
Favorite Trail:
any w/ dirt
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Strengths:
nothing
Weaknesses:
i blew out the side wall in 6 days, this happed on the road, i only weight in at 125lbs
Similar Products Used:
other panarace's
Bike Setup:
a x-c racing bike
Bottom Line:
dont buy this tire if u like to walk out of the woods, or call for a ride back to your car when you are on the road. i will never use this tire again unless i get payed to. also i was runing 5psi below what is recremed fo road use.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
David Drach
a Cross Country Rider
from San Diego Date Reviewed: October 20, 2001
Favorite Trail:
changes all the time
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Purchased At:
Universal Cycles
Strengths:
Great for climbing. You can run low air pressure and get great results. I go between 35lbs & 40lbs depending on the ride...I weigh 195lbs.
Weaknesses:
I feel a little resistence on the road...I know, that's not what they were made for but that's the only thing I can come up with. Scares animals and little children with the noise made.
Similar Products Used:
Everything...tried the greens Mich's before this tire. Less resistence than the Trailblaster but doesn't grip as good on the climbs.
Bike Setup:
NRS AIR frame, XTR, Avid, Thompson, X-Vert Air Fork & a bell from Bell.
Bottom Line:
I like em. Climb great, works better @ lower pressures so experiment. The price is a little up there but I don't mind. On a budget? Get the Mythos IRC...they're great tires as well & you can get them for 15 bones a piece...or better!
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Franz
a Cross Country Rider
from New Jersey Date Reviewed: October 19, 2001
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$25.00
Purchased At:
Bennitts Cycles
Strengths:
Weight, Durabiltiy
Weaknesses:
none
Similar Products Used:
Specialized S-Works
Bottom Line:
These tires are way-way better than the crap S-Works tires that came on my Stumpy Pro. I will buy them again. 195s are on the small side but hold up great, I weigh 165lbs.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Miker
a
from PA Date Reviewed: October 13, 2001
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Strengths:
Light. Traction. Designed to be used on as front and tire.
Weaknesses:
None yet.
Similar Products Used:
Panracer Smoke - Very hard to beat for traction ano the rough stuff. I went to the Trialblaster sacraficing just a bit of traction for weight (rotational weight!)
Bontrager revolt and jones - probably ok for hard pack but not for wet roots and rock.
Others.
Bottom Line:
Best tire I've used so far. Great combination of weight and traction. I have not ridden the tire that long so I can't commnet on durability/wear.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
chris
a Cross Country Rider
from no. branford,ct usa Date Reviewed: October 3, 2001
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Strengths:
grip in mud, i dont spin out on roots any more and are ok on wet rocks. price. weight
Weaknesses:
none so far
Similar Products Used:
panaracer fire, dart
Bike Setup:
all good parts
Bottom Line:
i ran this tires for the 1st time today and did loss my grip on off camber roots or wet rocks. i run the 1.8 for the rear @ 50 psi and 1.95 for the front @ 45 psi
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Bill
a Cross Country Rider
from San Jose Date Reviewed: September 12, 2001
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$29.00
Purchased At:
performance
Strengths:
light, easiest tire to get on/off rim, pretty quick roller, probably a good race 2.1 knob in the right conditions
Weaknesses:
wear REAL fast, seem to get a lot of punctures, tire seems to run on casing as well as knobs. i had some knobs worn down in two months. not good traction on loose climbs, or off camber, a good tire to slide with if it's your bag. ripped a casing on some rocks..not good
Similar Products Used:
Panaracer, IRC
Bike Setup:
Pro~Flex "959", disk brakes, xt xtr RF xypost, Thompson, Easton
Bottom Line:
if i raced maybe i'd run these for that purpose, otherwise your money is spent better on a tire that will last longer and not melt away. the rip in the casing freaked me out, i'm back on Fire XC pro's
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Glenn
a Racer
from Denver, CO Date Reviewed: September 5, 2001
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$27.00
Purchased At:
Price Point
Strengths:
Grip
Weaknesses:
None
Similar Products Used:
Fire XC Pro's, Specialized Dirt Control
Bottom Line:
I used these in a XC race this past weekend and gave me amazing confidence on the downhills with this tyre. I had a 2.1 on the front as I was tired of my specialized dirt control washing out from under me. They may be a bit knobby for my liking but its a trade off. Needless to say I won my race on this tyre and was flying downhill like Ive never done before, never washed out once.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
s-rocket
a Cross Country Rider
from Anchorage Date Reviewed: September 2, 2001
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Strengths:
Reasonably light, good traction on hard pac, good braking in dry hard pac conditionsl
Weaknesses:
This tire has virtually no lateral control in muddy conditions. If it's slimy it will slide when cornering. Not much control in loose gravel type conditions.
Bottom Line:
Too many negatives where I ride.....
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Carl
a Cross Country Rider
from NorCal Date Reviewed: August 22, 2001
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Strengths:
Lightweight, fast, low rolling resistance
Weaknesses:
Like most lightweight tires this is not an all-conditions tire. That isn't really a weakness, though.
Similar Products Used:
All Panaracers!
Bike Setup:
SOULCRAFT w/ Ritchey WCS Wheelset
Bottom Line:
This is a fast rolling tire really suited for racing. I have read some reviews about premature wear, but I rode a pair 3x a week racing on the weekend for 3 months and replaced the rear only cause I wanted full clean tread for a big race. I may be lucky or maybe it's not so rocky on my local trails, but I have not had the same sidewall or wear troubles. This tire performs when you want to go fast. Not the best braking tire, it's a compromise. It really shines in the loamy soil.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Nate
a Cross Country Rider
from Peterborough Date Reviewed: August 15, 2001
Duration Product Used:
3 months
Price Paid:
$20.00
Purchased At:
MEC
Bottom Line:
It was a good tire while it lasted, then it wore out down to the strings very prematurely in many spots in the center of the tire between the knobs???? This part doesn't really touch the ground...
Replaced no questions asked...and changed to Fire XC Pro...
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
Big O
a Weekend Warrior
from Monterey Date Reviewed: August 13, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Galbraith
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$29.00
Purchased At:
Performance
Strengths:
Light for a 2.1
Weaknesses:
Flats easily, sidewalls are weak, sketchy tire at a variety of pressures that avoid flatting.
Similar Products Used:
Lots
Bike Setup:
Titus Quasimoto, Z1 QR20, Xt, Hayes, etc.
Bottom Line:
Had good luck with Firepro's so I thought I'd give these a try. Have been severly disappointed overall. Tires are wearing quickly and I have had more flats than with any other tire in the past 2 years of riding. To avoid flats I had to increase pressure which made them sketchy as others have mentioned. My sidewalls have two cuts in them--which was always rare in the past for me. As soon as these totally give up (which looks to be soon) I may go back to Fire Pro's. There are better tires out there... at least for me.
Value Rating:Overall Rating:
Submitted by
frank
a Cross Country Rider
from Helena, MT Date Reviewed: August 13, 2001
Favorite Trail:
Silver Creek(steamboat springs) now wilderness designation
Duration Product Used:
Less than 1 month
Price Paid:
$29.00
Strengths:
lightweight
Weaknesses:
durability, braking performance
Similar Products Used:
too many to list
Bike Setup:
XTR, Chris King, Monkey lite risers, SID SL, Fox Float RC, Time ATAC
Bottom Line:
After 3 weeks this tire is trash. The rubber between the large lugs has worn off exposing thread which has also worn through. Climbs well (as do must tires on hardpack). Braking performance on steep descents very poor. Note:Review refers to the Trailblaster 2.1 used as a rear tire at 45psi on dry rocky terrain. Bottom line: it lasted less than one month!
$ 40.00
Overall Rating:
Overall Rating:
Overall Rating:
Overall Rating:
Overall Rating:
