Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (5 Reviews Total)
| |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
bad mechanic
a Cross Country Rider
from Maryland, USADate Reviewed: April 12, 2010
Strengths: A reliable, light weight tube. Not much more to say.Weaknesses: None.Bottom Line: These tubes have proven to be as reliable as anything out there, provided the pressure isn't low. I've used them in some extremely thin walled tires, and the only flat I've gotten was from a thorn, which would flat any tube. Since an average tube weighs about 200g, these cut 70g per tube, and roughly a quarter pound of rotating weight per bike. Since I buy them whenever they go on sale at Performance, I get them for about $7 a tube, which is very cheap for a light weight tube.
These tubes are one of the rare exceptions where it's durable, light, AND cheap. There really isn't a downside.
Please be aware, however, that these are cross country or trail tubes. These aren't freeride or DH tubes.
Duration Product Used: More than 3 years
Price Paid:
$7.00
Purchased At: Performance
Similar Products Used: I don't even have time to list all the different tubes I've tried. Let's just a LOT.
Bike Setup: Single speed running Conti MK 2.2 Supersonic tires.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
richard t
a Cross Country Rider
from los alamos, nmDate Reviewed: January 23, 2007
Strengths: light, no fuss tubesWeaknesses: more prone to flats than heavier tubes, but a non-issue if installed and ridden correctlyBottom Line: Just thought I'd add a current review on this tube.
Bottom line: It's a good ultralight tube. I've been running them on my bikes since getting back into xc riding a couple years ago. The only time I've gotten flats is when riding through sticker-ridden fields when the singletrack ended and I felt like exploring. My own fault there, though heavier tube with sealant would have saved the day.
For appropriate riding, including screaming decents and death march ascents, these tubes are solid and have never let me down!
Favorite Trail: guaje ridge
Duration Product Used: 2 Years
Price Paid:
$5.00
Purchased At: performancebike.com
Bike Setup: 2002 RM Element
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Tyoda
a Cross Country Rider
from N CalifDate Reviewed: July 18, 2003
Strengths: Readily available at your local Performance store. Cheaper than "name brand" tubes, yet work just as well.Bottom Line: Tube is a tube. These are a bit on the thin/light side so be careful not to run them too low or they will easily pinch flat on technical rides. Ran my last pair for 5 months- maybe a bit lucky, but no flats until just recently.
Duration Product Used: 6 months
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Jon Howard
a Racer
from Milwaukee, WiDate Reviewed: December 19, 2002
Strengths: They work.
Light weight.Weaknesses: None so farBottom Line: Have lasted a season of XC racing, 8 races plus training. I talcum powder the tubes before I put them on and I probably took the tires and tubes off several times during the season to check rim tape, cuts, etc.
I got these on sale and I'll get more when they are on sale again. If you're a sloppy wrencher though and don't do much maintenance you're probably safer with heavy tubes.
Duration Product Used: 6 months
Bike Setup: Using with Python Lights on Sun Tomac XC rims
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Tom M
a Weekend Warrior
from Germantown, MDDate Reviewed: November 8, 2002
Strengths: LightWeaknesses: 4 flats on one light ride.Bottom Line: These tubes suck. I went out for a light ride, on pavement. I didn't bring a spare tube, but did have a patch kit. I put about 7 miles on the ride and had to fix the tube 4 times. Later, when I went to change the tube, it had gone flat a fifth time. There were no jumps or road hazards.
Duration Product Used: 3 months
Price Paid:
$3.00
Purchased At: Performance
Similar Products Used: First Ultralight tube - maybe the last.
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (5 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |