Submitted by
hoolie
a Cross Country Rider
from Oakland, CA
Date Reviewed: September 24, 2011
Strengths: Good tread pattern. Harder rubber for longevity on the street if you road ride to trails. Narrow with widely spaced knobs for mud shedding.
Weaknesses: My only problem with this tire is it is low profile. I run XT 29er wheels that are not wide and this tire is still too low profile to run at low pressure without rim damage from logs and boulders. I now realize I prefer Large volume casing.
Bottom Line:
I like this tire tread. But for me the low profile is a deal killer for advanced riders in the rocks. I think this is a good tire for you if you need longer lasting rubber, and ride smoother trails/fireroad. Also, I used this tire in loamy, leaf covered forests that have no obstacles and this tire is great. Logs, rocks, and and stairs are not this products strong points.
Weaknesses: poor grip in rocks, wears VERY quickly
Bottom Line:
For the record: I'm 6'1, 175 riding in extremely rocky conditions. AM tires for the trails I'm riding this bike on are typically Ardent's and Nevegal's.
I've never used Schwalbe's before and was surprised by the rigidity of the casing and bead. Tubless on Flows they were very easy to setup.
While it initially looked like it would make a good back tire for our very rocky/gravelly trails and the light weight would be welcome on our long climbs, it didn't grip well at all especially on broken rock. Tried changing from my standard 27psi all over the place but just couldn't get them to stop deflecting off rocks as if the rubber was just too hard. Hard corners at the limit of traction would result in sudden and complete loss of traction with very little control once traction was lost. Constantly in lower speed corners the tread would "pop" off the side of a rock jumping the rear end all over.
I slit all the transition knobs vertically (north south with the direction of travel) and it's now a totally different story. Great traction and totally controllable at the limit. It went from a poor performing tire to one of the better ones for our area.
The problem now is that with only about 10 hours on it it's wearing VERY quickly. Not the knobs I cut but the center knobs and the outer knobs. Centers are wearing from climbing steep rocks though the braking edges are fine. The outer knobs are rounding out and some are close to tearing off.
Overall I'm pretty disappointed in this tire. I realize it was discontinued but if this is what I can expect of the ultra expensive Schwalbe brand I'll be sticking with my Maxxis Ardents and Geax tires.
Submitted by
wannabfast
a Weekend Warrior
from Saratoga, CA
Date Reviewed: July 20, 2008
Strengths: Great traction, sidewall protection, reasonable rolling resistance and works well in a variety of conditions.
Weaknesses: A bit pricey
Bottom Line:
Highly recommended. The tire works well on a variety conditions, dirt, fire roads, roots and rocky terrain. I was really pleased that the Albert run with Stans survived the Downieville XC without a flat or rip.
Similar Products Used: Nobby Nic, Rampage and Big Betty
Bike Setup: Stumpy 120, Talas 140, Hopes and XO.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Kevin
a Cross Country Rider
from Alabama
Date Reviewed: October 19, 2007
Strengths: I'm running the UST version. Great construction, super durable sidewall with the snakeskin. Aired up with no Stan's, bead set very nicely. Totally predictive handling, was an upgrade to the 2.35 Nevegal DTC I took off. Unidirectional tread, clears mud well, nice profile. This has been a super tire for me.
Weaknesses: Bit pricey, as all Schwalbes are. UST version is advertised at 840 grams. Would like a "tubeless ready" version with the Evolution casing.
Bottom Line:
I'm a Schwalbe convert. Great construction, great performance. The Albert has been a confidence inspiring tire. Might go with the 2.35 Fat Albert next go around, leaving the 2.25 Albert in the back.
Similar Products Used: WTB Exiwolf, Weirwolf, Kenda Nevegal, Small Block 8, Geax Saguaro
Bike Setup: 5" full suspension trail bike
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Michel
a Cross Country Rider
from Netherlands
Date Reviewed: August 9, 2007
Strengths: This review is for the Albert ALPENCROSS tyre. Excellent grip on loose rocks, very strong no punctures due to raceguard/snakeskin combo
Weaknesses: perhaps weight (670g), further none
Bottom Line:
I used the Albert and Smart Sam tyres in the new AlpenCross version of Schwalbe and put them on my Stumpjumper fsr.
I used them indeed marathon biking in the Alps. The tyres were excellent...the Albert has excellent grip in front and smart sam has very low rolling resistence, although never slippery and loose gravel. Smart sam can however get slippery on wet tree roots in the forest. After 2 weeks of use in the alps there was no sign of damage and had no punctures.
I can recommend to anyone riding in rocky or mountainous terrain. Ok, they weigh 670g but you will feel very secure and you can ride downhill very fast...
Similar Products Used: Nobby Nic, racing Ralps, Hutchinson Python, Specialized
Bike Setup: Orbea Alma Cup Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Alan
from Switzerland
Date Reviewed: August 7, 2007
Strengths: Grip Not Heavy Sidewalls very strong (snakeskin 2.25)
Weaknesses: Rolling resistance and noisy on road Too soft..on road
Bottom Line:
No more punctures and that already a good news because with the Nobby Nic 2,25 one time out of two I got it. I do still more than 50% on road, so this tire is really too soft for me, offroad has a very good grip.
Similar Products Used: Maxxis Larssen TT, Schwalbe Nobby Nic, Specialized Pro
Bike Setup: Specialized SJ FSR, Larssen TT 2.35 front and Albert 2.25 snakeskin rear
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Gabi K.
a Weekend Warrior
from Tel-Aviv, Israel
Date Reviewed: November 5, 2006
Strengths: Great grip, very stable,large vollume, excels in sigletracks.
Weaknesses: Not the fastest tire - there is a price for grip.
Bottom Line:
I use the foldable Albert 2.25 rear and the soft compound (front only) in the front, 35 psi front, 40 rear. As a reviewer wrote below, it took two rides until it really "sits down". After 50 km it shows lot of grip, very stable in singletracks, cornering and bracking. The only minus it is not a fast roller you'll feel it in long climbs - but I prefer this in a rocky garden or while flying over fire roads. Compared to the conti vertical pro it is slower but with more grip. Bottom line - if you are on the xc line maybe it is not for you, if you are on the all mountain, singletracks and down - you'll be happy
Similar Products Used: WTB Exiwolf, Specialized Adrenaline Pro
Bike Setup: Haro Shift R7
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
ramilcp
a Weekend Warrior
from Whittier, CA
Date Reviewed: March 12, 2006
Strengths: Light, high volume, good grip rolling and cornering.
Weaknesses: None.
Bottom Line:
I have the 2.25 'Light' version set up as a rear tire. It has great grip on hardpack, as well as wet roots and rocks. Even off-camber pitches are no problem for this tire. It helps inspire confidence on the trails when you know your tires will hook up on most everything.
Similar Products Used: IRC: Kujo DH, Mythos XC F/R, Trailbear; Panaracer: Smoke, Dart, Fire XC Pro; Bontrager SS F/R, Hutchinson Scorpion Airlight, Specialized S-Works Fast Trak.
Bike Setup: IRO Mia! rigid SS w/ Avid mech discs.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
re
a Cross Country Rider
from colorado high country
Date Reviewed: November 7, 2005
Strengths: weight is light, sidewalls held up
Weaknesses: side knobs rip off, alot of them! price, hard durometer
Bottom Line:
maybe i got two really bad tires because they didnt hold up at all. i am truly disappointed after hearing good things about the alberts. the side knobs ripped off, not one but damn near half of them. the tire didnt fail though so the snakeskin inner seems to work. overall however these tires suck compared to whats out there by kenda and specialized. not impressed.
Similar Products Used: tioga, wtb, spec, kenda(goodies), nokian, bonty, maxxis
Bike Setup: mav
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Superbman
a Cross Country Rider
from The Valley, MA
Date Reviewed: August 10, 2005
Strengths: This is for the rear/ snakeskin tire-very good roller, tough sidewalls, great grip
Weaknesses: none for me
Bottom Line:
Finally mated the rear albert to the front only and my riding hasnever been better. This looks like the end of a three year journey to find the perfect new england front and rear tire set up. I use the schwalbe albert front only snakeskin up front and a plain scwhalbe albert snakeskin rear-run them around 35 psi and never slip or slide anymore and still roll fairly quickly--can't beat that. Yee ha!
Bike Setup: Razorback with schwalbe front and rear
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Pete
a Cross Country Rider
from Hampton, CT
Date Reviewed: August 2, 2005
Strengths: Grip, light weight, strong sidewalls
Weaknesses: Price
Bottom Line:
I got these tires for my 575 because I figured a sweet ride needed sweet rubber and I couldn't be happier. The grip on New England rocks and roots is unreal!!! They are head and shoulders above my old FireXCs. I usually run them between 35-40psi and I have yet to pinch flat. The only flat I did get was from broken glass on the road. They are really light for their volume and durability.
The only downside I see to them is the price. I would love a new pair when these die, but the price may stop me. I was able to trade for this pair, so didn't have to throw down cash.
Similar Products Used: Panaracer FireXC for years and years
Bike Setup: Yeti 575
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Nick
a Cross Country Rider
from Rural Retreat, VA, USA
Date Reviewed: July 15, 2005
Strengths: Good grip, smooth rolling. Nice cushion.
Weaknesses: None really.
Bottom Line:
They have gotten better after breaking in, approx. 30 miles. I did have to play with tire pressure alot at the beginning. Started at 50 psi, rolled good but sacrificed grip. Went to 35 psi, super grip, lots of rolling resistance. Settled at 42 (3 bar). I will keep them here, seems to be perfect balance. I ride very rocky, rooty, wet, muddy, slimy trails, hey, it is southwest Virginia! They are lighter than a lot of 2.25's out there and I needed a well balanced tire for lots of different terrain. It is one tire I would recommend to trail riders.
Submitted by
Daniel
a Cross Country Rider
from Tübingen, Germany
Date Reviewed: July 12, 2005
Strengths: I was using Schwalbes Jimme for a while but when i wrecked my last one i was looking for something more durable. Im very happy with my albert now. It works well under a wide variety of conditions. No matter if it't dry or wet, the albert provides lots of traction in all situations. I'm riding the 2.25 wire version on my hardtail (rear). Very strong tire.
Weaknesses: Heavy
Bottom Line:
If you want a tire that works well no matter where you go you should check out the Albert.
Submitted by
Superb Man
a Cross Country Rider
from Massachusetts
Date Reviewed: July 7, 2005
Strengths: This is for the Front ONLY Snakeskin 2.25 Albert...I've never had a tire that grips this well on wet rocks and roots and still rolls well.
Weaknesses: None
Bottom Line:
Dang-but 2005 has been a wet wet wet and slimy year here in New England...a good gtrippy front tire is what I neede dand it's what I got..I really can't believe how well it grips wet roots and rocks up and down hill--slow speed or fast...now I just need a good compliment in the back! Seriously, if you're tired of slipping and sliding this season and you can't (or don't want to) run a big fat pig of a tire the Schwalbe Front specific albert is a dream come true.