Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 2 (2 Reviews Total)
| |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Super EDate Reviewed: May 26, 2012
Strengths: Light, standard front brake spacingWeaknesses: Unsure yet, has some fore/aft flexBottom Line: Short term review - so far it is a great fork on the trials and dirt roads. Will post a long term review later this year after more use. It does have a slight amount of fore and aft flex which I do not think is a bad trait in any rigid fork. Love the standard front brake spacing.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
SmooveP
a Cross Country RiderDate Reviewed: May 3, 2012
Strengths: Stiff and light
Good lookin'Weaknesses: Limited hub selectionBottom Line: Got this as part of my Twenty2 Cycles Bully fatbike build. It's the 450mm A-C version. My previous fabike was a Pugsley, and I loved the solid feel of a rigid steel fork after decades of riding suspension forks. I was worried that this fork would not be as stiff and solid feeling as the Pugs fork, but luckily it's plenty stiff. It's also noticeably lighter. Very easy to get the front wheel up.
I've pushed the fork pretty hard on some very rocky trails, and it has worked perfectly so far. It's taken a few minor hits with no damage to the carbon yet.
The fork uses front disc rotor spacing, which is somewhat rare among fatbike forks, so hub choices are slim. Fortunately, one of the choices is the Paul Whub, which is a fairly light, well-made and easy to service unit.
In summary, a light, solid, beautiful fork.
Favorite Trail: Allamuchy North
Purchased At: Twenty2
Similar Products Used: Surly steel offset fork
Bike Setup: Twenty2 Cycles Bully fatbike
Sram X0, Rolling Darryl rims, Paul Components Whub front hub, X0 brakes w 160mm rotor
|
Reviews 1 - 2 (2 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |