Submitted by
ripstyleben
a Downhiller
from Cornwall
Date Reviewed: December 25, 2010
Strengths: Hard as stone product, take a beating agaisnt any form of hit being a tree or a rock!
Weaknesses: No compression after tweeking, rebound cartridge blows easy, 20mm through lost its tightning hitch, causes front end to jump out on corners.
Bottom Line:
If you are after a bomber fork you best stay away from these forks, they cause you alot of problems and arent worth the hassle! I recommend a older fork in the bomber series (Bomber 66 2007) or (drop off triple)
Submitted by
diablorider12
a Racer
from new jersey
Date Reviewed: August 1, 2010
Strengths: NONE!!!!! they came stock when i first bought my bike
Weaknesses: the worst forks ever!!! in the year i had them they blew out 6 times. within in one run when i got them from the company back they would blow out and i would have to send them back to the company again nd paylike $400. and i only weigh 135 pounds. WASTE OF MONEY DO NOT CONCIDER BUYING THESE FORKS
Bottom Line:
DO NOT BUY THIS FORK UNLESS U WANT TO WASTE YOUR MONEY!!!!!!! THEY MAKE THE WORST FORKS OUT THERE!
Bike Setup: kona coil air fox rear with magiclink.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Turtle01
a Weekend Warrior
from Brunswick, OH
Date Reviewed: October 7, 2009
Strengths: Laterally stiff, price, weight for this type of fork.
Weaknesses: Nervous of potential damper failure.
Bottom Line:
This fork is a has some stiction that needs to be ridden more to smooth up. Don't set the rebound to high or it will amplify that issue.
Also, I've had very good customer service with Marzocchi and hope that if there is a problem they will take care of it. Their past forks have been very good for me. Tired of all the manufactures raising prices so high on forks when they are... well... forks. This fork was an excellent deal (on sale) given current pricing and what you get.
Similar Products Used: Marzocchi '00 Z1cr, '05 66vf.
Bike Setup: DialledBikes Prince Albert, 55r fork, Mavic 317/XT/DMR wheelset. All mountain / aggressive XC setup.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
pauljolly65Q
a Cross Country Rider
from Santa Rosa, CA
Date Reviewed: August 8, 2009
Strengths: Price, beefy build, price, stiffness (thanks to 20mm thru).
Weaknesses: Not advertised travel--far less.
Bottom Line:
For $230, there was nothing else available that I felt confident putting on my bike. Fork was more plush out of the box, but has gotten stiffer over many rides (I get out 3-4x/week for 2-3 hours each). It still takes the edge off the rocky trails quite well, but travel is nowhere near 140mm. I've taken out all the air (I'm only 140 lbs) and it still won't bottom. Online manuals don't help in this regard. Still, especially for the price, it works OK for me.
Bike Setup: '01 Stinky DeeLuxe--cranks are only original parts left.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
highstandards
a Weekend Warrior
from Calgary, AB, Canada
Date Reviewed: August 7, 2009
Strengths: Makes the trail seem slightly less bumpy.
Weaknesses: Flexy, false travel claims, adjustability, small bump sensitivity and did I mention false travel claim? More like 130mm or 140mm NOT 160mm
Bottom Line:
Fine for easy cruising and little drops, takes the edge off the bumps. Does not get claimed travel. Spend a little more if you like to go fast or big. Probably fine for a beginner.
Submitted by
acostao
a Weekend Warrior
from Hood River, OR
Date Reviewed: July 18, 2009
Strengths: cheap. Looks burly.
Weaknesses: This is the 08 55R...A big disappointment. I have been riding 15 years. I have a big bike with dual crown, and a smaller Heckler with this 55r on it. I pedal everywhere and ride down hard, including some jumps, drops, and gnar. It is NOT anywhere near a freeride fork, despite the weight. Lets see. It currently gets only 4 inches of travel (supposed to be 140 mm). It is pretty good on small and even medium hits. Unpredictable on big hits. Heavier riders have to use lots of preload (I weigh 200 lbs), which makes it feel less plush, sticky, and still blows through its whopping 4 inches instantly. My 05 Sherman firefly is still better than this fork, 4 years later. My friend had the 55 TST2, it went bad in a few months. Marzochhi kept it for 6 weeks, then returned it with the TST still not working properly.
The compression stroke is weird on bigger hits, inconsistent. Ramp faces are scary on this fork. I feel I can't trust it, even though I have been on this bike for 4 year and could always trust it before.
Bottom Line:
I used to love Zokes. But, the company can't even write a decent manual. their customer service sucks. The enitre 08 line should have been a recall. Too bad, because I love the zoke feel and damping. I have owned and ridden several fox forks, but don't like Fox damping, especially the cardboardy and overrated TALAS 36. The newer Rock shocks are nice, but also unreliable. I have ridden my friend's 2009 66 ATA, which is butter, but what the chambers do is a mystery, which has to be resolved by resorting to user group forum. C'mon, 1 less blond bimbo on the ads and pay some English speaking tech-nerd to tell us how to adjust and work on our forks.
This would be a decent trail fork and good value for someone who doesn't do drops, dirt jumps or enjoy gnar... if it were more reliable.
Similar Products Used: too many, but mostly bigger bikes and forks lately.
Bike Setup: Heckler, built up to about 33 lbs.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
rv55
a Weekend Warrior
from Framingham, MA
Date Reviewed: May 4, 2009
Strengths: Not expensive, OK for the few days it worked.
Weaknesses: After 1-2 rides had a kind of loosenes and a klonking noise. Sent it to Marzocchi, came back after 3 weeks, and after 4-5 rides the travel is only 75 mm. Marzocchi says it has a bad damper, will send a new one to the shop. Hopes are high...
Similar Products Used: Manitou Sherman Breakout
Marzocchi Z150 FR
Bike Setup: 2008 Specialized SX Trail
Fox DHX 5.0
Kenda Nevegal 2.35, 2.5
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Oregonism
a Weekend Warrior
from Oregon
Date Reviewed: April 10, 2009
Strengths: -Stiff
-Soaks up big stuff pretty well, still tuning for small bumps
-Cheap for a decent fork
-Can switch between 160mm and 140mm if your mechanically inclined
-Effective and simple damper
Weaknesses: -Heavy
-Lowers seem to scratch pretty easily (set the bike down on its side, picked it up and it was all scuffed up)
Bottom Line:
I've ridden this fork pretty hard for about 2 weeks, including many jumps off of a 4 foot step down I built and it hasn't so much as hiccuped. The Ario on the rear is already starting to make some noise though..
Similar Products Used: Dirt jumper, Low-end RS stuff
Bike Setup: BMC Trailfox, marz 55r, spank wheelset, azonic and raceface bits.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
prowlus
a Weekend Warrior
from United Kingdom
Date Reviewed: February 27, 2009
Strengths: Very very reliable . Easy to maintain and adjust . Soaked bumps up like a sponge
Weaknesses: Very heavy
Bottom Line:
These forks powered my ransom everywhere and have had no problems whatsoever with their simple but reliable adjustability thanks to the air dampening towards a coil as opposed to current fully air based 55 atas (which have broken even before they left the store)with their complicated tst2 system that now need a update cartridge after its 2nd failure .
The bomber R is the simplest and easiest fork to use and I should not have decided to replace it with an air based POS
Similar Products Used: Rockshox Pike , Tora and currently Marzocchi 55 ata 09
Bike Setup: Scott Ransom 40 , Marzocchi 55 ata 2009 (current fork) Avid Juicy 7 brakes, Shimano XT cranks . Sram X9 mech and shifters . Hope hoops ex 5.1d wheels Crank brothers joplin seatpost
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Yaniv650
a Weekend Warrior
from Tel Aviv Israel
Date Reviewed: January 26, 2009
Strengths: I put it on my endure 2006 . It works perfectly , very plush and very stiff.
I ride it very fast , annoying any obstacle on my way . simple as point and shoot.
Whether I ride on long massive desert stone terrain or fast rounding trials , it keeps the front section under control.
I was afraid that 6 lbs on the front will make the ascent harder but on 140 mm , there is nothing that this fork will stop you.
Considering the simplicity of this product – I have never felt that I need TST / travel adjustment etc.. features.
I found this simplicity combined with well design product as advantage over multi adj forks that you never know if you have the right set up.
Weaknesses: there is a knocking noise when riding on stone terrain. it sound like something is rocker deep in the rebound section
it doesnt make anything except the noise.
Bottom Line:
If it will remain as good as it now ,
on 250$ there is nothing to compare with. simple as that.
Submitted by
Hmmmm
a Weekend Warrior
from Ballarat Australia
Date Reviewed: December 10, 2008
Strengths: Whwn working its great smooth, smooth smooth
Weaknesses: Fork was stock on a fluid LT3 (great bike apart from this fork). Right out of the box the rebound cartridge was faulty and only provided half of the travel, at best. Got that fixed up by marzocchi (took them 3 weeks to touch it) and within 4 days the cartridge failed again. The dudes in the local shop were great about it but they cant do anything if Marzocchi void your warranty for touching it
Bottom Line:
Ive been hearing quite a few bad things about the quality of marzocchi stuff over the last year or so. Be cautious of their stuff it seems to be on the slide.
Submitted by
chelboed
a Weekend Warrior
from Kansas
Date Reviewed: November 28, 2008
Strengths: Laterally stiff! Initially smooth and plush. Very easy to set up. (c'mon...there's only 2 adjustments, haha)
Weaknesses: Sorta cheap'ish rebound controls with no detent.
Very subtle knock/rattle noise when quickly going from compressed to extended. It's not a rebound clunk, the noise occurs prior to full extension. It happens when the fork initially begins to extend. The only thing I can think of is that there's a tiny bit of play in the rebound cartridge, so when the fork begins to extend, the clunk happens. It doesn't effect anything and half the time I don't even hear it.
Bottom Line:
This is an early review that I will update as I use the fork. I've only had it a month or two and though I'm always bagging on the dorks around here that prematurely review products with no time invested...I wanted to do an initial review and add to it later. Mainly b/c the thing is so great right out of the box.
I've been riding AM/Light Freeride before Cannondale tried to patent the term and building my own bikes from scratch for about 4yrs now.
Reading about the 2008 lower line Marz crap, I was a little leary to buy this fork. So far so good.
It's set up right now at 140mm...I think I'll leave it that way for now. It feels really balanced and the ride height is nice. I ride Kansas singletrack and urban.
Small bump compliance straight out of the box was 100% better than my Fox 32 Vanilla. (which is supposed to be the "plushest 5 inch fork out there") Preload is accomplished via a coil spring with air assist. Initially, I thought the fork was way too soft, but the air preload actually ramps up quite progressively. With 10-15psi, there's little-to-no stiffening of the first 1/2 of the fork travel. Very responsive to small bump input. Going beyond the first 1/2, the air begins to compress enough to firm it up a bit. I spoke with Marz about the chamber being able to withstand more pressure than the 20psi max and they said it would handle at least 50psi with no ill effects. I pumped it up to 30psi and did some 3' to flat stair drops just to try it out. I wasn't getting anywhere close to full travel even when stiff-arming a curb. I dropped the air down to 10psi and did a 5' to tranny and still had at least 10-15mm of travel to spare. (remember its only set at 140mm)
I use the fork as an "all-rounder" so it's my trail shredder, urban hucker, and even occasionally my commuter. It will bob on you if you stand up and pedal...that is obvious. I'm not a huge fan of threshold and blow off b/c I think it takes away from the "plush-factor" of my suspension, so it works well for me the way it is.
Overall, comparing it to the 32 Vanilla is a joke. The only thing the Fox had over the 55 was less weight. This fork is heavy at 6lbs, but I didn't care with a Freeride Hardtail. It has superior lateral and fore/aft stiffness. It's super plush right out of the box, and the simple controls will kill the learning curve. I know that this fork is more in line with the Fox 36, RS Lyrik, and the like, but I can't afford that crap and I don't need to as long as this thing holds up.
I will expound on this review as I break it in a little more.
Similar Products Used: marzocchi 888,marzocchi 66, rockshox boxxer, rockshox lyrik
Bike Setup: 07 stinky garbonzo, race face DH crankset, race face chainguide, 888, D.O.P.E
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
skip canfield
a Weekend Warrior
from norcal
Date Reviewed: August 3, 2008
Strengths: easy to set-up, simple,not broken in yet still smooth, steers really nice
Weaknesses: to many decals
Bottom Line:
very nice fork, simple to use, once i get it broken-in im sure it will be even smoother than it is now. steering is like point & shoot,it goes where you point it.
Bike Setup: Spec. fsr pro, Risse rear-end,Marz. 55r fork
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
reelinfeele
a Weekend Warrior
from orlando
Date Reviewed: July 31, 2008
Strengths: burly, lighter than it looks, super plush
Weaknesses: heavier than it needs to be
Bottom Line:
so far so good. Very plush action. simple setup. Will be going to NC in a week so after good break in around here I will be able to there and really give it a bashing. Couldn't beat the price. I now have a respectible all mountain bike for less than the cost of a "high end" frame.