|
Specialized
Ground Control Aim Comp 1997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Submitted by
Sean Haugen
a Racer
from Anacortes,Wa,USA
Date Reviewed: November 1, 2008 | | Favorite Trail: | 302 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Purchased At: | my brother | | Strengths: | EVERYTHING>except | | Weaknesses: | i wish i could mount a larger coil in the rear, and also disc brakes in the rear. | | Similar Products Used: | Specialied stumpjumper
Specialized hardrock
Specialized Rockhopper | | Bike Setup: | S works carbon bars
Full XTR
Race face bashgaurd w/22t-36t rings
Specialized freeride stem
Lock on grips
WTB velociraptor tire set
Spinergy RevXRoks carbon rims <----not good for DH they kinda cracked so i must buy Mavic CrossMax
Fox Vanilla rear coil
Manitou TiSX fork | | Bottom Line: | my brother raced factory for specialized, and he gave this to me and it is a great bike! idc what nayone says but this bike domintes the FR, DH, and AM/XC world.It is the best bike and people dont know thattill they ride it!!
5 CHILIS!!!!!!!!! | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mark
a Weekend Warrior
from Tucson, Arizona
Date Reviewed: March 1, 2008 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1200.00 | | Strengths: | Nimble, handles beautifully on tight trails, reasonable weight, tough frame and paint finish | | Weaknesses: | OE rear shock bad on early production
Front Judy SL - needs upgrade w/oil damping | | Similar Products Used: | 1998 AMP B5
Marin F/S
Specialized AIM Comp FSR
Specialized FSR
Jamis Dakar FS (1st version)
| | Bike Setup: | Indy SL w/OTIS oil damping cartridge,
Ti sealed BB, custom handbuilt wheelset, XT rear derailleur, Sachs shifter, riser bar, 20T granny, LX crankset, carbon seatpost - weight 26.5 lbs in 19-inch frame | | Bottom Line: | This is a great handling Mac-strut F/S bike that should have gotten more press and riders. Unfortunately Specialized dropped its entire line of Mac-strut FS Ground Control bikes after only a year in favor of the FSR rocker-arm FS models.
Like everyone else, my Rockshox coil/oil rear shock soon lost its damping. After going round & round with RockShox and the LBS, I finally got the shock replaced free of charge. Ironically, the replacement rear shock works perfectly to this day. I added the (now long-gone) OTIS oil damping cartridge to the Indy SL which turned it into a respectable fork with an honest 3" of travel. Over the years I built a light custom wheelset for it and replaced components, so that the bike now weighs only about 26.5 lbs in the large (19-inch) frame.
Still handles great, quick steering, no squeaks in crank or swingarm pivots. The Mac Strut design works beautifully , just as it did when new. Too bad Specialized doesn't offer longterm parts support for its discontinued bikes like some other manufacturers - I could keep it going indefinitely. | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Samuel Wakefield
a Cross Country Rider
from Cumberland, MD
Date Reviewed: October 17, 2007 | | Favorite Trail: | Rocky Gap State Park | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$350.00 | | Purchased At: | Craigslist | | Strengths: | Very light compared to newer models but still very strong frame, quick steering response, nimble in corners. Did I say LIGHT? | | Weaknesses: | stock Indy Rock Shox is HORRIBLE, derailleurs a little sketchy, rear shock could be better, may be a little noisy at pivots | | Similar Products Used: | Gary Fisher hardtail, newer FSR's | | Bike Setup: | Mostly stock components, new RockShox DART III fork, MSH pedals, upgraded grips, seat and tires | | Bottom Line: | This is a great bike that has served me very well in the short time I have owned it. I have had it on rail trails, cross-country trails and even hardcore downill trails. It just keeps bangin'! If you want a good, all around bike that is light but, that can take the punishment and won't break the bank, then this is the machine for you. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Rick
a Weekend Warrior
from Savannah, GA
Date Reviewed: June 22, 2006 | | Favorite Trail: | Dog River, Hood River Oregon | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1500.00 | | Purchased At: | Orange Cycle Orlando | | Strengths: | Relatively light weight, easy maintenance, precise handling | | Weaknesses: | RockShox Deluxe rear shock | | Similar Products Used: | Blur LT | | Bike Setup: | Judy xc fork, panaracer tires | | Bottom Line: | Great bike after ten years of listening to the strut style shock squeak. Got a rebuild last year and the noise went away. I had to throw it at some serious rocky downhill to get that squeak back. All is well again. This bike has been reliable for my annual smoky mountain rides and only failed me when UPS bounced it off the big chain ring which required a full crank replacement. The short wheelbase and steep head tube angle make for precise handling and a wicked ride. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
William
a Weekend Warrior
from Hong Kong
Date Reviewed: December 3, 2003 | | Favorite Trail: | Silver City, NM | | Duration Product Used: | 2 Years | | Price Paid: |
$500.00 | | Purchased At: | friend | | Strengths: | light frame, great handling, can do what XC bike perform and freerider need!!! | | Weaknesses: | some squeeks in the supensions links, but it is all good. change to a risses racing rear shocks and this bike rocks!!! | | Similar Products Used: | 95' hardrock, GT hardtail, I-drive, kona hardtail | | Bike Setup: | zoc' boomer z3, risses racing rear shock, d xt group, x517 rim, | | Bottom Line: | this bike really kick ass. the frame is soo stiff and strong that you cannot break it. I have done 3 feet drop and it just takes it like nothing. it really impress me. this is a bike when you want the performance, lightweight and durability for a fraction of $$. 5 chilis!!! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Don Briggs
a Downhiller
from North Shore, BC CANADA
Date Reviewed: November 28, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | Upper Oilcan - Mt.Fromme | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1100.00 | | Purchased At: | Toronto - back in '96 | | Strengths: | Light (compared to most DH bikes these days), Strong (haven't broken frame yet - even on big drops), Good geometry. Also a good multi-purpose bike (DH, XC, urban) | | Weaknesses: | Rear shock was crap from the beginning! Like most of the reviews say, I eventually blew mine out. The rebound damping was shot from the start! Hard to find replacement. | | Similar Products Used: | FOES Weasle, Specialized BigHit Pro/DH, Balfa BB7, Trek, Rocky Mountain, etc, etc... | | Bike Setup: | Rock Shox Jett Long Travel forks, Shimano LX Rapid Fire shifters, V-brakes, DH bars, short seat post, all rest stock | | Bottom Line: | The bike has served me very well over the years. I have ridden a lot of XC, downhill, "North Shore" riding (technical with skinny bridges and a lot of drops) and urban / trial type stuff. The bike has stuck it out through all that stuff for all the 6 years I've had it. One of the best improvements I made was putting 2.3" tires front and rear. Yeah, more weight, but NO pinch flats with a softer, more stable ride. The kind of riding I do most now would benifit from a longer travel bike with disc brakes, but I'll live with this one, since it's more affordable. I'm thinking of replacing my strut-mount RC deluxe with a Fox Vanilla R. I'm going to modify it by cutting off the bottom mounting eyelett. If anyone has info on replacing this rear shock, I'd appreciate the e-mail! Overall, I love this bike though! A few squeeks and groans, but fairly dependable!
| | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Scott
a Cross Country Rider
from San Jose, CA USA
Date Reviewed: November 13, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | Oak Mountain State Park | | Duration Product Used: | 2 Years | | Price Paid: |
$60.00 | | Purchased At: | from a friend | | Strengths: | Handling is really good, and it holds up to my riding style | | Weaknesses: | rear shock snapped on a 2 ft drop, paint chips easy | | Similar Products Used: | cheap department store bikes | | Bike Setup: | 2002 Judy xc (80mm), Deore Lx front and rear deraillers, Dia-comp Sa-Aheadset, Deore crankset | | Bottom Line: | For being the 3rd owner and riding hard, this bike is good for the long run. the past 2 owners have jumped it, raced it, and done everything else with it and no dents, just some paint is chipped off. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
richie dagger
a Cross Country Rider
from sacramento ca. usa
Date Reviewed: November 3, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | s p railyard & land fill downtoun sac | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1000.00 | | Purchased At: | city bike works | | Strengths: | geometry,ruggedness,comfort!!! | | Weaknesses: | none! | | Similar Products Used: | canondale v trek Y | | Bike Setup: | t
totaly stock setup. indy front fork ,diacomp v grip shift | | Bottom Line: | this bike was purchased after test riding about 8 different brands.the ground control was the best one of the
bunch ,it was also the cheapest . in 5 years of use the only parts i ever changed were a bottom bracket ,a brake
arm and a cluster. this bike will go down in my books as
a true winner. i first got the bike home thinking that
i would change the parts as they broke.they all held up
pretty well!! after 5 years of use i wanted a new specalized. to bad they cost twice as much now.
| | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Muddy Trail
a Cross Country Rider
from Tacoma, WA, US
Date Reviewed: September 13, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | Skookum flats | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1100.00 | | Purchased At: | Rainier Cycle Sports | | Strengths: | Light weight,durable frame. It's red | | Weaknesses: | Original Indy shock and junk rock shok deluxe rear shock | | Similar Products Used: | Tested proflex, GT | | Bike Setup: | Manitou FS,Risse Genesis rear shock, Carbon monkey bar risers, XT rear derailer, rest stock. | | Bottom Line: | Once I swapped out the front and rear shocks it was a whole new bike. I recently had the main bushings for the rear end changed to sealed ball bearing. Now it is smooth as you can get with 3 inches of travel front and rear (speed springs in the Manitou).Five years old and still going strong. A great all around ride. See no reason to fork out big buck for another bike until this one breaks. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Muddy Trail
a Cross Country Rider
from Tacoma
Date Reviewed: May 5, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | Skookum Flats | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1100.00 | | Purchased At: | Rainier Cycle Sports | | Strengths: | Handling, almost light and it's red | | Weaknesses: | Stock rear and front shocks | | Similar Products Used: | GT, Klien Mantra | | Bike Setup: | Genesis rear shock and Manitou FS up front. Easton monkey carbon monkey bars, the rest stock. | | Bottom Line: | After almost five years of riding an average of two times a week in many times muddy conditions the bike is still holding up. I have the original bushings in the main pivot with no slop, the bottom braket is hanging tough too. I didn't know how bad the suspension was until I replaced the front and rear shocks- big improvement. It weighs in at 27.25 lbs., which is respectable. Three inches of travel front and rear does the job. I am going to try to get a machine shop to change the main pivots to sealed ball bearing, I hear it can be done. As long as it holds together I see no reason to upgrade to another FS bike only to get maybe an inch more travel and more weight. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
DAMASTA99
a Cross Country Rider
from NORTH POTOMAC MD
Date Reviewed: July 23, 2001 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1100.00 | | Purchased At: | The Bicycle Place | | Strengths: | light weight frame | | Weaknesses: | stock parts | | Similar Products Used: | FSR's | | Bike Setup: | 100mm judy race soon to be 125 Z.3 flylight race face bb, cranks and stem. SRAM 9.0 sl rd and xt fd. time ATAC pedal. | | Bottom Line: | cheap begginer FS. im 255 and have detroyed the rear shock, but have made the bike work for my XC adn DH riding habats. if any one needs a 17.5 frame email me and i make a deal. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Alex
a Weekend Warrior
from New Mex. & UT
Date Reviewed: October 31, 2000 | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Price Paid: |
$500.00 | | Purchased At: | Used | | Strengths: | Durability
Light-weight
Handling | | Weaknesses: | Stock components.
Worthless Specialized Cranks | | Similar Products Used: | Tested a '99 FSR | | Bike Setup: | '97 Ground Ctrl AIM A1, Marzoochi Z5 (front), Risse Genesis (rear), Avid Arch Rival 50 (f/r), Avid speed disc levers, XTR/LX setup | | Bottom Line: | I don't think I can count the number of times I wrecked on this bike, but I am impressed that the frame is still in good condition.
This is an excellent bike if you can upgrade to better components.
When I first purchased the bike, I had a lot of problems with: brakes, suspension, cranks, rear deralliuer. However, after a few good upgrade to better components the bike handles, climbs, and performs like a champ.
Unfortunately the stock components are crap, The first component that failed on my bike was the rear shock, followed by a bent crank, many chains later the rear derailluer(LX) died, and finally one of the brake sets broke. However while progessively upgrading, the bike handled much better each time. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Cycle Guy
a Cross Country Rider
from Anchorage, Alaska
Date Reviewed: September 1, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | Johnson Pass | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Price Paid: |
$1100.00 | | Strengths: | With uggrades to suspension, this bike handles nice. Risse shock in rear firms up ride and weighs less, Manitou SXR in front was big improvement over stock. Quick handling bike that changes direction immediately. Very good for tight trails and fire roads. | | Weaknesses: | Very quick steering, somewhat twitchy, you must pay attention. | | Bike Setup: | Specialized Ground Control AIM Comp w/ Manitou SX-R fork, Risse Racing Genesis shock, riser bars, Dean seat post, Ritchey semi-slicks. | | Bottom Line: | For small extra investment, this bike performs well. It weighs less than 27.5 lbs, and is a very quick handling bike. I weigh 200 lbs. so frame must be strong...this bike is very solid. The Indy fork and Rock Shox shock were awful, but the upgrades (fork and shock) work very well. In addition, this bike is one of the best looking bikes I have ever seen. I constantly get comments from other riders about my bike. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Fett
a Cross Country Rider
from Columbus, IN
Date Reviewed: May 20, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | Knobstone | | Duration Product Used: | 2 Years | | Strengths: | Works well, reasonably light, durable (except rear shock) | | Weaknesses: | Rear Shock-If you buy one of these, upgrade to Risse Genesis ASAP-you won't be sorry. | | Similar Products Used: | Currently ride Giant XTC DS1 | | Bike Setup: | Manitou Pro-everything else is now back to stock. I have the Comp model-the red one. | | Bottom Line: | I really like this bike once I got the Risse Genesis shock. It firmed up the rear end and works well. It also took about a half pound off the bike. I abused this bike for 2 years and it never failed me. It is now in semi retirement as my wife's bike. I had gotten it as low as 24.7 pounds in various component variations. It currently weighs a little over 26 lbs in a medium. If you can find a used one, it is a good all around bike. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Josh
a Weekend Warrior
from San Diego, Ca, USA
Date Reviewed: April 27, 2000 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Weaknesses: | Loud shock. I've had the same problem other people describe. My shock is very harsh and the bike is embarassing to ride because it makes so much noise. | | Bike Setup: | Stock | | Bottom Line: | I love full suspension, but as soon as I can afford it, this bike is history. It's a little outdated - not many Mac Strut bikes still around. I want something with more, better travel and some quality suspension components.
The bike wasn't a bad deal at the time - 4 Chilis
The bike kind of sucks now - 3 Chilis | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Muddy Trail
a Weekend Warrior
from Tacoma,Wa.
Date Reviewed: November 28, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Ladies Only | | Duration Product Used: |
2 Years | | Strengths: |
Overall handling and climbing prowness | | Weaknesses: |
Original fork and rear shock | | Similar Products Used: |
Pro Flex | | Bike Setup: |
Manitou FS fork (speed spring inside) ,Risse Genesis rear shock,Easton carbon low rise handle bars-the rest is stock. | | Bottom Line: | I didn't realize how bad the suspension was on this bike until I installed the front and rear shock upgrades. I was on my third rock shok deluxe and it was clunking on rebound. I just heard that rock shok now makes a SID to fit on the rear( it is used on a new TREK too). I haven't had the other problems other riders have ( ghost shifts,bottom bracket noise or sub frame brakage). In original form it gets two flamers,but now I'll give it five big ones. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Brad Hardesty
a Cross-Country Rider
from St. Louis, MO
Date Reviewed: November 3, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Tour de Wolf | | Duration Product Used: |
3 months | | Strengths: |
Light, strong frame with quality welds. Climbs and handles excellently. | | Weaknesses: |
This bike will have no weaknesses if built with good quality components. | | Similar Products Used: |
I have borrowed and thoroughly tested several different models of 1998 and 1999 FSR bicycles. | | Bike Setup: |
1997 FSR Ground Control frame w/Rock Shox Deluxe rear shock. 1999 Manitou SX fork (fully upgraded). 1999 Shimano XT shifters and derailluers. Shimano XT cassette (11-30). Race Face bottom bracket w/ Shimano crankset and chainrings(22/32/44). Dia-Compe 767 brakes. WTB SpeedMaster wheelset (machined) w/GreaseGuard hubs. Ringle Zooka stem, Kore seatpost, Profile riser bars and an ARC seat. | | Bottom Line: | I built this bike about 4 months ago. I only bought the frame and rear shock used (on this website) so I did not get a chance to ride a complete factory stock 97 FSR Ground Control Comp with the stock components and Indy fork (thank goodness!). I have however, had the opportunity to ride several different 98 and 99 FSR bikes and I like this model the best. In my opinion this model FSR pogo's less than the newer models (it really had no noticeable pogo problem at all). It handles smoothly and also climbs like a goat. It is lighter than most of the factory stock FSR bikes that I have tested (my bike weighs under 27 lbs.). I personally believe that the so called new improvements to the FSR frame have done nothing more than to just reduce the cost of producing the FSR bicycle. If you ever get a chance to own or build one of these you will not have any regrets. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Richard Raddatz
a Weekend Warrior
from Orem,UT
Date Reviewed: October 17, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
2 Years | | Strengths: |
Light | | Weaknesses: |
Front Shock | | Similar Products Used: |
Cannondale Super-V 500, Gary Fisher Joshua X | | Bike Setup: |
every thing is stock | | Bottom Line: | I bought this bike used and it has performed better then I had thought. Very light and fast(even for a 200pd rider). If I could change anything I would put a new shock up front. If you see one for cheep BUY it this bike performes just as well as those new ones. Oh ya the only problem I have ever had is a broken chain... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Lars Brusven
a Cross-Country Rider
from Nelson, BC
Date Reviewed: September 16, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
The Paperbag | | Duration Product Used: |
tested or demo'ed only | | Strengths: |
dunoo | | Weaknesses: |
dunno | | Similar Products Used: |
none | | Bike Setup: |
dunno | | Bottom Line: | hi, I am going to be buying a barely used '97 fsr gc the white one, from what I hear from the reviews I'm gunna be needing a new rear shock pretty soon, and I was just wondering what you people suggest, also I will probably upgrade the indy xc's and I was thinking about bomber z3 longtravels, I would like your opinion on that! :)
I am also wondering what kind of shifters it has, please, if you have time, let me know at blah_98@hotmail.com thanks :P | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris Ericks
a Cross-Country Rider
from Sacramento, Ca
Date Reviewed: April 27, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Bullards Bar Resevoir (Nevada City) | | Duration Product Used: |
6 months | | Strengths: |
Looked cool at the time | | Weaknesses: |
The bike was not very good quality. I bent the bolt on seat post mount, went through 3 shocks, and had to deal with the rear-end rattle from the blown rear shock. | | Similar Products Used: |
Got the dealer to crash-replace the bike for the 98 FSR PRO which I am extremely happy with. | | Bike Setup: |
FOX cheesy-style rear shock, and lamo Rock Shock Indy XC's in the front. | | Bottom Line: | This bike was a disapointment after the first month. After blowing the rear shock twice due to major flex, and bending the bolt on seat post mount, I wished I had bought something else. This bike was not the quality I was led to believe. On a downhill the rear end chattered and was so loud I felt like I was riding a department store special. I would not recommend this bike to anyone who does any serious riding. However, after talking to the shop I got it at, they gave me a crash replacement deal toward the 98 FSR PRO. I give the pro a 5 chil-pepper rating with a splash of El Tapatio on top....HOT STUFF!!!!!!!!! | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris
a weekend warrior
from Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Date Reviewed: January 31, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
Update on my review of the GC from Dec. '97. I kept the bike to the end of Aug. '98, and then sold it. Why? I had a few problems with the bike specifically and perhaps a philosophical problem with the bike generally. Specifics: the bottom bracket squeaked from day one to the time I sold it; the ghost-shifting only went away after I bought and installed a Grip-Shift Bassworm; the rear shock did blow (replaced at no cost or service charges under warranty; I was only given the Rock Shox service manuals 4 months after I bought the bike, so I could figure out how to properly adjust both suspension pieces; the rear subframe pivots at the bottom bracket needed constant cleaning or they would really creak quite loudly. Now all these problems were eventually rectified, and I even went further and bought a set of Shimano 747 clipless pedals just to round off the bike. Only problem was, I realized that the hype of full-suspension didn't seem to live up to the reality of actually using it. I mean, the bike bounced up and down like it should, but I guess I was expecting more of a magic carpet ride. I'm not interested, though, in the freeride style of full-suspension bike, and I don't like the hassle of adjusting suspension pieces and cleaning/lubing pivot points. The Ground Control worked like a proper XC suspension bike should, but I realized that the style of bike just doesn't match the style of riding I prefer. The next bike purchase I'll make will be a freeride HARDTAIL bike, so I'll get the long-travel magic carpet ride feel on the front end, and I won't have to worry about anything on the back-end of the bike. Unfortunately, Specialized doesn't make a freeride hardtail, so I'm going to have to look at something from Fisher, Trek, Kona, or Rocky Mountain. I hope the person I sold my GC to is enjoying it! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Michael Nehring
a cross-country rider
from Berlin, CT
Date Reviewed: January 19, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
My first FS bike, and I think my last! I got a 50/50 deal with my dad for christmas and I got an Ground Control with 36 miles on it for $650, a nice deal because the guy I bought it from had shaterd his knee (ouch!!) and he couldn;t ride any more (sucks!). This bike climbs like a 4X4! He got clipless for it and I can now jump 4.5'! A nice light bike! Anybody should get this bike! 105 hot ones for Ground Control!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Shawn
a cross-country rider
from Roanoke Va
Date Reviewed: January 8, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
I got the Ground Control frame with the Rock Shox deluxe (no rebound adjustment) for Christmas from my parents. This is my first fs bike and I haven't quite got it sorted out yet. The components are a follows:
fork: 98 marzocchi atom bomb
all components are xt except for shifters and rear derailleur
shifters: sram esp 9.0
rear der: sram esp 9.0 sl
h-bar: Bontrager Crowbar Race
stem: specialized 135mm
rims: bontrager mustang ceramic with asym rear
tires: dirt master & dirt control with kevlar bead
saddle: specialized pro contolThis bike as its setup right now weghs 26.5 lbs on our Weightronix scale at work. This is for a size 17. I can't get the rear shock to travel as smoothly as the front with my current set-up. I have the preload set on the zoke set at 5mm. I have almost no preload on the rear but I only weigh 150 lbs. My rear shock does make a clunking noise when it fully extends so it may be low on oil like someone below said. I'm anxious to try a different rear shock but I want it to match my 'zoke; I'm not looking for something that simply weighs less. If I want light and fast I'll ride my S-works hardtail. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dan Z
a racer
from Usa
Date Reviewed: December 16, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Well i bought this bike the exact first day of 1998....i got it used and it was in good shape when i got it....rides good...controls good..and is overall performance wise good...well..after about a month..i blew the rear shock out..and about 5 more times this summer ..so that sux..but i may get a risse shock for it.and i busted the seat pod(got a new one on warranty)..ok i upgraded this thing so much..that the only thing stock is the frame and the (broken) bb...
Upgrade:
Fork:Manitou Fs
Wheels: lx/wtb
Tires: Assorted depends on the terrain
handle bars: club roost go fast
Shifter:8.0 attack
Brakes: Magures and xtr v's
Stem: dimension
Seat:Wtb
Seatpost:Control Tech
Rear Deariler/Front: 98 XTR
Cranks: 98 xt
Cassete:98 XT (8spd)
and soon the bb will be fixed..and i'm gonna get the rear shock replaced with a risse genesis
and the the ride will be real sweet...i'm gonna replace the frame soon to with a fsr xc 99..i beat the live daylights outta this bike..but it still going stong...but the thing is its too heavy.....but when i get the new frame and wheels...and fork..it will be definetly lighter!
lata
i give it 4 chilles for putting up with me..and -1 fer being so damn heavy. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dewayne Janes
a cross-country rider
from Columbus IN USA
Date Reviewed: October 5, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I recently bought a 1997 Ground Control A. Comp. I'm very satisfied with it so far I have not had any problems so far but I'm going to up grade to XT casset and rapid fire shifters, LX front derailluer.The gripshift is ok but if you set the bike up side down you crack the shifters, cant do that with rapid fire.I raced a few weekends a go and it handled really good. Did not have any problems with the suspension, if the rear was much softer it would wanted to bounce to much(was loose as it would go,I weight about 120or125. Has a 400lb. coil sping).Placed 4th out of 13 first race and have never rode on the trail. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
sam gramlich
a cross-country rider
from Atwater, CA
Date Reviewed: August 31, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
15 month followup!
OK, so i'm bummed to see the 98's out with a swingarm. That aside, I have ridden my GC AIM Comp hard and long, with nary a complaint. I haven't done any special maintenance except swap the chain. After crashing into - yes - a parking garage, I had to replace the fork. Got a used Hi-5 off of MTBR for $125, and ACCIDENTALLY created a monster machine! The fork is a major improvement, and after a few more weeks of fiddling with the 17 elastomers and spacer, should provide the perfect counterpart. Slowing down the head angle was a blessing, because the bike tracks much more reliably at high speed (you owners know what I mean). Have had to lube everything only twice, and that was because there is much mud in Ohio. Out here in California the trails are much nicer, but the vert will kill you (on the way up!). I love the looks we get driving down the road with two full suspensions on the roof (wife has trek y-5), most people just GAWK. If you can find one of these still at retail or used - get it, it is a rare a disappearing breed - the medium travel CC machine. The only bummer is the 30 lbs (with the Hi-5). And after 20 feet of a dry creek bed, you are ready to forgive that! Happy riding. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Rich Sack
a cross-country rider
from Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Date Reviewed: August 17, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I love this bike. It is a true cross-country full suspension moutain bike. It has all around excellent handling. Climbs as good as any hardtail, but still has enough give in the back to keep your knees and lower back from getting soar after that long ride with your buddies. The only problem with this bike is the rock shox rear shock which often times comes new from the bike shop a little low on oil. I have had to replace this rock shox 3 times because of the leaky rear shock(twice it came new with low oil). If you have any oil missing you will begin to hear a metal clanking sound which is caused by the piston (being oriented in an upward position, instead of downwards like on the 98 fsr model with the same shock) moving in its upper position without any oil to slow the movement. The shock has no negative spring so if you go over a little bump the piston won't go down far enough to dip itself into the oil to slow itself down, which results in the metal piston hitting the metal cap of the shock with no oil to slow it down....the result a loud clank on the little bumps. Risse sells a rear shock that is almost a pound lighter, is more rigid(longitudinally) and works so much better. My rear suspension is like a cadillac compared to the rock shox suspension. Changing the rear shock is the best thing you can do to this bike. If you are going to keep you oil shock with its low oil level, make sure you add enough sag to the rear end so that the piston is setting in the oil and not on top of it. I give the bike 4 stars because the rear shock it crapp. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris
a weekend warrior
from Venetia , PA
Date Reviewed: July 30, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
This is a great bike , I've had nothing but praise for it since I bought it . I found it on a closeout and it was only $950 , its a lotta bike for the money but when i race in the summer of '99 i'll probably purchase a dual crown fork im decicding between the RST Hi-Five and the Rock Shox Judy XL or XLC because the Rock Shox Indy XC is a little doesent have enough travel for my type of riding . If you can find a leftover of this bike i'd encourage you to buy it. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
John Herbert
a cross-country rider
from NEW ZEALAND
Date Reviewed: July 28, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have just bought the aim 1 comp on special for US$800 I have ridden a few F.S. bikes lately and can say this is the best all round bike. It isnt a down hill bike but for singletrack and technical terrain it works well. I am not that impressed with the Indy XC but it will have to do at the moment, the rear works well and isnt like riding a pogo stick, you can climb with the hard tails. The bike just plain works. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
nev
a weekend warrior
from marin county
Date Reviewed: July 11, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
i just paid $500.00 for a used 97 pro, i must say that i upgraded to sram esp derailler,shifters,and brake levers, and manitou palmer stroker fork. this bike is great i was ready to spend the big bucks on a new bike and got a great deal at a local bike swap. I would like to try a new rear shock, but this bike rocks. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Roger S. Prior
a cross-country rider
from Springfield, VT
Date Reviewed: July 10, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have read a lot of good stuff and bad stuff about the bike and everything I have to say is great. Some people get lemons, you get that from everything in life. Its also the maintenance you do upon such a thing, if you treat it like dirt, its gonna treat you back the same way. Example: I cleaned and lubed everything except the pivot points for the rear sway arm. And guess what started squeaking... Im sure this is the cause of a lot of the noises coming from the rear shock since the noise is coming from the general area. The vibrations also transmit through the rear arm. Lube them suckers up! If you need help or info on how to get to them give me a ring.
Last thing, I love the bike even though the components could be better. Then again, the price would be better too! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Luca
a weekend warrior
from Brussels
Date Reviewed: June 19, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Ok, this is an update on my review of few months ago.
The bike, an AIM GC PRO (yellow one), size 19, has gone through these upgrades:
added a couple of bar-ends Avenir Profile;
RaceFace Headset;
Ritchey WCS 22 handlebar with Bontrager foam grips (VERY light);
Action Tech Ti BB;
XT 11-30 cassette;
PC-91 chain;
avid pad/holder combos on both LX V-brakes;
added Shimano Carbon booster on the front;
Selle Italia Flite Ti rails;
changed interiors of Indy SL with Englund TAT '98;
changed Rockshox Coupe DeLuxe with air/oil Risse genesis shock;
thrashed the Mavic 220 and bought a set of Crossmax;
Black snake cables (with teflon; sort of Ride-on made in France)
changed Team Control/Master with Extreme Control/Master tire (here it is very, very muddy most of the year. I will swap to the Team ones when it will be dry again (Yeah...when!?);Money spent overall: I don't want to even think about it. But now the rig is a real cross country beast. Very light (24 lbs!) and responsive. The Genesis has been a huge improvement in the rear (don't like the rear bobbing with coils). The booster has improved braking and substantially improved the rigidity of the fork, to such an extent that I don't plan to change it any time soon (expecially now that I have englunds in it, which are a perfect match for the Risse).
Crossmax, as well, have given wings to this bike. It's too bad that they are so expensive. But I got them new for 500$ and I cannot complain too much.Now I really love this bike. I have always done, actually, but now it is nearly perfect. And the new GC XC that will be available by end 98 seems to me just its natural evolution. As a mater of fact the swing link there does not increase the travel of the rear, but just takes away the lateral stress from the shock, for longer durability. Will it be my next bike?Enjoy your rides | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Matt
a weekend warrior
from Washingtin
Date Reviewed: June 18, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I own a 1997 GC A1 Aim (the white one). I have only one complaint, the spring for the Rock Shox Deluxe shock is too heavy for someone who weighs only 110lbs.. I plan to replace it with a lighter spring within a couple of weeks. I have enjoyed the bike very much. It stays on the ground (where it belongs). I would recomend you put bar ends on it because it is a pain to climb with other wise. The tires are the BEST! I don't see what everyone is complaining about with the shock. Yeah, it does squeek a little but, what shock doesn't at some point in it's life? I gave it a five star rating because it's my baby. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mike
a cross-country rider
from WA
Date Reviewed: June 18, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have had this bike for just over 6 months. I have broken the seat pod(replaced under warenty) I have gone threw 1 rear shock. I am now waiting for a new rear triangle. I have gone threw 4 sets of pivots.
Upgrades:
Shock: FS TI
Shifters: ESP 9.0sl
Hedset: Kris King
Crankset AND BB: Race Face LP, un72 warrenty oringinl was to short.
Brakes: ESP levers, XT V's
Rims:King hubs Bontrager mustang asyms. I wore threw the Mavic 238s
The only oringinal parts are the Bars and stem and the main frame.
I love the way this bike rides and handles. I do race it often. I have had LOTS of down time waiting for Specialized to warrenty parts. I have taken over 3 LBS of the bike.I will get the FSR XC when it comes out.
Good ride, fun ride can't take abuse or hard riding. Don't even think about spriting on this thing. | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mr Evil
a weekend warrior
from Barrie Ontario, Canada
Date Reviewed: June 9, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought this bike purely as a spur of the moment thing. For years I pined over the old style FSR, so when I finally got my hands on some cash, I blew it on the first Specialized I came across. Not a mistake. So far this bike has blown me away. It accelerates very quick, tracks corners like a dream and hold a line like shriners at a strip club. I have noticed that the BB is crap though. Considering I have only had it on the trail a couple of times and I am dilligent with my lubrication sessions, I would expect it not to be as loud as it is. Not a major problem, It'll be replaced soon enough. I am also replacing the stock indy it came with. Its ugly. So I'm superficial, big deal. This bike deserves a triple clamp fork.
Other than that, this bike is definatly a deal. $1100. I almost feel guilty for paying so little. Get it. You won't be sorry. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
e-bud
a cross-country rider
from North Vancouver, BC Canada
Date Reviewed: May 29, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Hot Machine - I've got the Comp (yellow one) and have since replaced the Rock Shox SL's ( they suck) with some Z1's. Some intial problem with poor chain alignment which is now fix with an up grade to a new BB.This bike rocks!The 98's look equally as nice . . | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
ARTURO NAVARRO
a weekend warrior
from MEXICO CITY
Date Reviewed: May 12, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I BOUGHT ONLY THE FRAME (WHIT THE SUGINO CRANCK ARM AND THE SPECIALIZED BB), I REPLACE THE ROCK SHOX FRONT SUSPENCION WHIT A MANITOU FS AND IT WORK´S BETTER, WHIT XT V BRAKES GO FAST DOWN HILL HANDLEBAR, FSA ORBIT AHEAD SET
AND A DX CLIPLESS PEDALS, AND I LOOK´S AMAZING, BUT THE REAR SHOCK IT´S VERY NOISY, ANYBODY KNOWS WHY? CAN I REPLACE FOR A BETTER ONE?
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dougal
a weekend warrior
from New Zealand
Date Reviewed: May 8, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
With a few modifications this bike rocks. I replaced the indy with a manitou FS Ti, brakes with XT V and shifters with ESP900. The rear shock blew internally on the 4th ride. Had to be fixed twice under warranty and once by me because Rockshox used thicker oil the second time and it was way overdamped. Does anyone know of an alternative shock for this bike, with adjustable damping? The manitous match the rear much better than the indy and handle ALL bumps better. I took over a pound off the bike since I bought it (the standard BB is an anchor, but replaced with shimano by warranty). It now weighs just under 27 pounds but rides much lighter. 4000+ km on this bike, same set of tires, riser bars stopped the front end from washing out before the back by shifting my weight back. The Mac Strut is the best cross country design ever. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Harry
a cross-country rider
from New Jersey
Date Reviewed: March 26, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Mark Modello you are a fool. This site is about reviewing bikes, not bike shops.
Mark Modello you are a fool. This site is about reviewing bikes, not bike shops. Mark Modello you are a fool. This site is about reviewing bikes, not bike shops. Mark Modello you are a fool. This site is about reviewing bikes, not bike shops. Mark Modello you are a fool. This site is about reviewing bikes, not bike shops. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
James Grunenberg
a cross-country rider
from Ohio
Date Reviewed: March 7, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Spec. Ground Control A1 Comp: Red and black are such nice colors for a bike. Muted, understated, but
with plenty of style. The GC seems to have the same simple flair. The bike isn't an extravagant or outlandish nightmare, but has its pwn simple muted style.
The bike itself was spec'ed adequately. I didn't have to spend too much
to equip the bike the way that I wished. (No-one spec's a bike like I want :(
The Indy XC, GS, Seat, Wheels,and Rear D were all ditched at the bike's purchase,and replaced with a mix of parts bought and already owned. Replaced with Amp F-3 Carbon (light and relaible), XT pods (No Gripe Shift for me), Vetta Tri-Shock (Personal Pref), XT/217/14-15g , and a XT rear D finished the changes.
This brought down a 17 in frame to the 25-26 pound mark. (And all under $1500!!!)
The handling of the bike was at first a touch slow, but the replacement of the front fork with the Amp quickened the steering enough to bring the bike
well within the angles for perfect XC riding.
The chassis for the bike is stiff on the front triangle, and has (so -
far) remained flex free on the rear triangle. The frame is actually stiff
(as compared to my last bike, DB V-Link 1.0), and has no complaint with
V-brakes or quick turns.
The few complaints that I can find with the bike are the lack of usable water bottle mounts, (I refuse to use the one under the down tube, I want to
keep my hands, thank you.), the lack of bar-ends (which was fixed), and the impossible to adjust DC 727's on the bike.
All were fixed easily. No problems with the rear shock, but after hearing the horror stories, I'll be sure to watch that.James
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
KK aka Scabman
a weekend warrior
from The Third Coast (Austin,TX)
Date Reviewed: March 1, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought a '97 Ground Control FSR about 4 months ago. Test rode numerous other FS bikes in all price ranges ...This is the best riding of all after replacing the piece of sh-t Judy with a '98 Manitou SX-R ... also changed to XT shifters & front derailer & an Azonic downhill bar ( about $1600 as equipped from lbs ). This bike is very adjustable. After proper set up it is plush on chattery stepped downhills, doesn't bob & really digs in when climbing, & tears up single track. Why buy a bike that lifts the back wheel when attempting to climb, is scary squirrely descending, or has a spaghetti frame that breaks the first time you land after catching some monster air, or beats you to death because of terribly ineffective suspension designs. I'm a big fan of smaller independent builders, but I must give credit where credit is due. Specialized used the enormous resources they have to bring a line of bikes to the market ('97-'98 FSR) that have NONE of these drawbacks. Try one, but beware, you will want to own one too. Ride on!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mark Mondello
a cross-country rider
from St. Augustine, Florida
Date Reviewed: February 25, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
This is my folllow up on my 97 ground control which I got as a Christmas present. Previously I rated the bike three chillies, due to the seat pod bending after a mild crash. The LBS ordered me a new seat pod, after waiting three weeks and $83.00, my bike was back to normal. The replacement seat pod is very different from the original, the original had large holes cut in to it, the replacement is solid and weighs a bit more. Considering that the original part must not have be built correct, I expected my LBS to ship the damaged seat pod back to Specialiized and receive a credit back. Well the LBS, has lied to me and never sent it off, then attempted to tell me the part was inspected by the Specialized Rep. and determined to not be defective. I asked my LBS for the part back and they cannot find it, so now I am requesting my $83.00 back. Since the service was so bad from an Authorized Specialized Dealer, I must drop my rating down a chille, to two chillies. Besides all the complaints about my LBS, the bike is a blast to ride. It handles well and is pretty comfortable. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Brian Allen
a cross-country rider
from Arcata, CA
Date Reviewed: February 19, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I just bought this bike in January and love it so far. I haven't been able to ride too much because of all the rain up here in Norhtern California. I think the hardest part is getting the suspension set up. my rear shock seems ok for now, but I know they tend to bust after awhile. Any buddy find a good replace for the Coupe Deluxe RS? my old bike was a Bianchi MTB hardtail from the mid 1980s, it sucked hard. But this new bike corners, brakes, downhills, etc... better then any other bike I tested before I bought. Plus the price was right, brand new for $750. Old model in a new year spells good prices. This bike kicks butt and those of you who say it suck abviously don't know how to ride a bike. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Derya
a weekend warrior
from Boston, MA.
Date Reviewed: January 27, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have had my Ground Control for a year now, I have experienced the rear shock problem early on and had it replace and upgraded to a coupe delux. I have changed the drive-train and the brakes and levers to XTR and the front now rides on a Z1 Bomber. I love this bike, it is my baby and I recomend it to all that are ready to start the FS biking.. I too would give this bike 10 but will have to settle for 5. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris Sakkaris
a cross-country rider
from California
Date Reviewed: January 27, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
This bike rules!! This was my first full suspension bike and as far as I can say, this bike handles and feels great. Like most others that have owned this bike, you may find some problems with the rear shock, but from what I hear that pretty common in earlier full susp. bikes. The front shocks, Rock Shocks Indy xc's do the job but the stock version cant be torqued down as tightly as I would like for thoes long uphills or road riding. Acheep upgrade of the elastomers is a cheap and easy solution. Also I made an improvement to the rear shock adjustment colar by pre drilling some 7/64 holes (4 of them, 90 deg. from each) other screwing in some and installing some small screws. This may not look so pretty, but adjustments are made a lot easier especially in cold or muddy conditions, especially if you a pre load on. Overall a 5 for beginning full suspension!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
BUZ
a weekend warrior
from Belleville, Ontario, Canada
Date Reviewed: January 22, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I love this bike; although I had some problems with the rear shock 'bout a month after purchase,the nitrogen seals blew, when and where I'm not sure {scary!!!}. But my local dealer had me a re-furbished shock ,same name different design,[Canadian eh!]in 'bout 7 days. Other than that I have absolutley no quarrels with this bike, it handles like a dream and can take the s@#t and abuse. Right now it's in dry dock until spring, but when spring brings about it's ugly, dirty, muddy, face back to my area, Ill be mud kickin' ready!
UNTIL THEN , WAITING IMPATIENTLY: BUZ!
P.S. Enjoy everyone! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ed mondello
a cross-country rider
from boston
Date Reviewed: January 9, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I just gave a Specialized ground control for a gift and the seat post mount
bent . I am not sure if it has been covered yet or if they are going to
leave us hanging . The bike is solid and quick handling no bobing but just
enough plushness to take the edge off. Nice componet mix but no bar ends. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mark Mondello
a cross-country rider
from St. Augustine, Florida
Date Reviewed: January 7, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I just received a 1997 Ground Control A1 for Christmas. Excellent gift. I've only ridden it about five times on trails. This bike seems to do everything well. I'm able to keep up with and even challenge more experienced riders. I have had one problem with this bike. On my last ride I took a very hard landing on a medium size jump. Well of course I wrecked, resulting is bending the brace that the seat post goes into. I am going to the Specialized dealer today to see how they will go about replacing this part. I hope the wait is not long, because I really love riding this bike. I will give it three chiles untill I get the part replaced and see what kind of Customer Service Specialized exhibits. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Charlie
a weekend warrior
from Canada/USA
Date Reviewed: January 5, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
This is a second review to clarify shock adjustment and problems. Rock shox recommends 20% - 25% of sag in SHAFT length when all your weight is on bike. Suggestion is to shoot for 20%. Wrap a zip tie snugly (not too tight) to top of shaft. Sit on bike with all weight. Now measure distance zip tie has moved down shaft. The movement should be 20% - 25% of the shafts visable length when under the bikes own weight. Preload is used to fine tune sag, however, if it takes more than six full turns of ring then go to a heavier spring. If no preload is used and sag is not at least 20% go to lighter spring. My earlier recommendation uses a different method and should be ignored. Rock Shox is NOT recalling any of its rear shocks. Recalls are only done for safety reasons. They are fixing or replacing units that are damaged due to a nitrogen leak which is causing the blown seals etc. 98 units are supposed to have resolved this problem. If you want to catch the problem before the shock is destroyed follow the advice of an earlier commentary to see if you still have a shock charged with nitrogen. Aside from potential shock problem covered by Rock Shox and poor BBaxle it still deserves a five. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Charlie
a weekend warrior
from Canada/USA
Date Reviewed: January 5, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought two of these bikes in the spring of 97. One for me, one for the wife. I switched to XT components, Rhyno lite rims for me, Bontrger rims for the wife and swapped forks to RST 3.5 Mozo pro. GC components that were replaced were used to upgrade our hardtails (rims and brakes). GC Bikes are sweeeet. My 19 weighs 29.5LB and my wifes is 27.5lbs as described. They are not as light as we are made to believe. Our hardtails weigh closer to 25lbs. Truth is it does not matter. These bikes are well balanced and a joy to ride hard. Dollar for dollar you will not find better bikes. The frame and design can justify any upgrade you feel necessary. If you are interested in knowing how to set up your rear shock follow these guidelines. Sag should be set at 10 - 15% of unsprung weight. Never turn preload ring in more than six turns from no preload. If you can not get the right result go to a lighter or softer spring. Speaking of shocks... I weigh 215Lbs my wife 115lbs no blown seals to date. Set up is important, luck does not hurt either... One problem on both bikes. Bottom bracket axles suck. They come loose and creak. I replaced them with Shimano UN72 and loctited them in place. End of problem. These bikes are extremely fun in technical rocky terrain like that found at Whistler. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris
a weekend warrior
from Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Date Reviewed: December 9, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Bought the Ground Control AIM (the white model) in mid-November. The LBS didn't supply any owners manuals or give a primer on how to adjust the front or rear suspension pieces. It's winter in Calgary now, so the cold weather makes the Indy bumpers kind of useless, but the rear shock still does a decent job of keeping the rear wheel planted while climbing up snowy hills. Ghost-shifting is a major problem- maybe because the bike is still new or maybe I need to get one of those Avid Rollamijig devices. Any ideas, guys? I love the bike's handling, which seems to be hardwired into my head, especially on the tight, singletrack riding I prefer to do here in the foothills of the Rockies. Kudos also to the Team Master/ Control tire combo-what traction problems? I give this bike four chillies. I'd give it more except for the lack of info at the LBS (not Specialized's fault directly) and the chronic ghost shifting. Have fun, and remember, the white-framed GC blends into Canadian snow better than your more expensive red and yellow models! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
BUZ
a cross-country rider
from BELLEVILLE , CANADA
Date Reviewed: December 5, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I CONCURE, THIS BIKE RULZ!!!
Although it's in the shop right now because of a faulty shock, {Rockshox Deluxe Rear Shock}.RockShox is replacing the shock,{ with what style I'm not sure}, for free! Whether you ride hard or not it's a good idea to have your Shock inspected ! On a lighter note; if anybody dosen't know, washing your bike with a hose or a pressure sprayer can be bad for it's health if you rate this bike as highly as I do you don't want it to get sick. Let it dry off naturally, because hosing and spraying can lead to WASHING of vital fluids. {ie:pedals, shocks....}
Then simply get a bucket use warm not hot water a dry rag and a toothbrush. Preferably your roommates. Keep your bike lubricants handy because after you dry off your baby she'll need a quick freshening up. I would have put 10 chili's, but they don't have that many!
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
SH@WN
a racer
from USA
Date Reviewed: December 2, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
It's me once again
here the update on the GC.
The bike still rocks and have fixed my
shifting promlem. But I have heard there is a recall
on the GC cause of the rear shock.
Well this bike is still a great bike and if you are looking
for a good FS bike HERE YOU GO
GC KICKS SERIOUS BUTT | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
scott marcano
a cross-country rider
from orlando,florida
Date Reviewed: November 12, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
i got my bike about four months ago since then i've ridden it on what trails we have around central florida, no hills to speak of but pretty technical with jumps et cet set up. i've also had it up to north carolina,(around asheville), and done some good down hill. i like its quick steering and good climbing but the bottom bracket started squeaking all the time, was the allen head crank bolts. i had to tighten them way too often so i replaced them with standard, no more squeaking. i up graded the fork to three inch travel and its been cool but on a recent ride i bent the ,son of strong arm, crank. has anybody else had a problem with this crank? p.s. specialized had a recall on the rear shock, they wil replace it for free at the bike shop you got the bike at, the bad shock is why the rear bottoms when at the extreme leangth of its travel. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Shawn Bell
a racer
from New England
Date Reviewed: November 7, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
This bike ROCKS.......
The bike is unbeleivable it barely bobs has great handling and rides like a
dream. I had to change the spring for the rear suspension due to the low rider
weight. Also I had a few probs with shifting but everything on it is the best.
I'm only 15 and I have rode my teamates (DR RACING TEAM) FS bikes and nothing compares to my GC. There bikes are a FS SHCWINN S-20 and a PRO FLEX ? If your lookin for a good FS check out the GC......
GC | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
brad
a racer
from portland or
Date Reviewed: October 30, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
i bought this bike for my wife and her and i both think it's the cats ass! i managed to convince the owner of the bike store to strip some of the lower end components off this rig so that it would work better. i put a full xt package that i bought from cambria bikes and a 97 long travel judy xc. swapped the cockpit for a lighter, better fitting one and it manages to tip the scales right at 25lbs in the 15.5 size. for the price and simplicity of the mac-strut suspension design in the back, the bike rocks! this bike climbs great with the team master and team control tires and pogoes relatively little. the travel in the back is a mere 2.8 inches, not much but enough to take the edge off her ass, saving it for later when she wants to be ridden herself. (is it just me or is mountain biking the greatest sport with the sexiest women, that have hard asses and sweat.. running ever so slowly.................. down between them two firm......yes....mountains!) ride hard or track to the left. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Lucky Luke
a weekend warrior
from Brussels
Date Reviewed: October 28, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I own a GC AIM Pro (the yellow one) and I am quite happy with it. I have had problems with the BB making squeaking, but it has disappeared after few weeks, with no intervention. I still carry the indy SL fork, which is possibly the weak point of the bike (too flexy and bouncy). I would also like to change the rear shock with an air one (NORCO Bomber1997, type).
For the rest, it handles great and its real limit is the rider (that's me!). Does anyone of you know how much a 19 weighs?. I have been told 26 lb, but it seems to be unlikely, even if some upgrades ( UN 72BB, XTR rear hub/cassette) could well bring it to 25 lb.
To JohnM: please let me/us know if you find the upgrade to the rear shock. For your problem, I solved it finding the right tuning of the rebound control.
Now that Spec.d have come out with the new '98 models, it should be easy to find a good '97 at a bargain price. It's worth the money, i tell you.
F.S. is the way to go. Enjoy your rides.
By the way, i don't give 5 chilis because there is always room for improvement, but this bike is already great as it is! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
John M
a weekend warrior
from atlanta
Date Reviewed: October 25, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
My wife and I both have the ground control aim comp. The bikes are great. They do a good job climbing and fly on downhills. We put Titec riser bars and Manitou FS forks on the bikes. Other than that they are bone stock. The bike is excellant for weekend rides. Very comfortable. Very nice suspension for the price. I've got to admit though, the linkage design on the 98's looks far superior.Question, do any of you have problems with the shock TOPPING out on rebounds. Both mine and my wifes bike top out with a loud bang when dropping off or catching air. Are there any cures for this, such as a replacement rear shock with better rebound damping? If I found a replacement shock out there I will post it here later. Thanks for any help.It would be 5 stars if not for the topping out of the shock. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
MK
a cross-country rider
from Boise, Idaho
Date Reviewed: October 16, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I purchased a Ground Control Aim 1 Pro about 1 1/2 months ago and am extremely pleased with the performance. I did upgrade the front shocks to Judy XC's, and feel this has made a difference. I am about 175lbs and when I get air coming down hill it just is a nice soft feeling when I come down to earth, rather than a bone jarring, teeth rattling, impact, that I got on my hard tail rock hopper. I gotta give it a 5 !! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Eike J. Umlauf
a weekend warrior
from Krems/Austria
Date Reviewed: October 8, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I got my Specialized GC Comp 5 months ago and I still think there´s nothing up to it! The handling is simply great, with the plush suspension wiping out any bumps and nasty potholes on your way to your favourite downhill trail. What´s more, it climbs like a space shuttle and presents you with the envy of any crap Nakamura biker you´re passing by. Although rear suspension travel is a tad limited (due to the 3-link system), the GC still fares great when it comes to red hot speedy downhill. The Team Control/Master Tires are the fattest MTB-Tires I´ve ever seen, but don´t expect them to grip like hell in tight asphalt corners. On the other hand´s side, they really dig muddy trails and throw mud and gravel at anyone trying to follow you too closely. Oh, yes, and the Specialized-brand front hub performance is nothing short of the likes of an XTR-thingy.
SUMMARY: I wouldn´t swap this bike for anything else. Well, except for a brand-new Specialized FSR, maybe.
PS: That´s the wrong picture at the top of the page, buddies! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dave
a cross-country rider
from South Carolina
Date Reviewed: September 10, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
THis is about a 4 month update. I've really grown to love this bike, it handles great! I did have some problems at first crashing alot, but it was due to the extra speed I have with this bike, but I'm over that now. It is a noisy bike, and I'm begining to get a little noise from the bottom bracket. I've also had a bit of trouble w/ ghost shifting (cleaning the cassette and chain helps this problem big time, but hit that first patch of mud and it'll start again). anyway, love this bike!!! but, I just saw some pictures of the '98 FSR's and they look sweet! I might be selling this baby for a new FSR | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Andy Northwind
a cross-country rider
from Wenatchee, WA.
Date Reviewed: September 6, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought my Ground Control Comp AIM in March and have since logged 1700 miles on it without any major mechanical problems. The Bottom bracket squeeked when I first got it, but it turned out to be just loose. I have not had any problems with ghost shifting at all with my bike, but I do clean it religisouly after each major ride. The pivots points on the bike do not seem to loose at all. The only complaint I have had about this bike is that it seems real stiff in the rearend, I weigh 150lbs and It just dosen't seem as plush as other bikes I tried before buying the GC Comp. But when I ride to work and have a backpack on filled with work clothes and other junk (aprox 20-25lbs) the bike just floats along. I tried over 8 different bikes in the same price range and no of them came close to the GC Comp. I would highly recomend this bike to anyone | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
william fong
a cross-country rider
from malaysia
Date Reviewed: July 31, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
specialized ground control aim comp 1997 | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Paul Bunyon
a cross-country rider
from Ontario, Canada
Date Reviewed: July 27, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Went shopping for full suspension for simple creature comfort. Rode several but chose the GC A1 Pro. Upgraded at LBS immediately to Jucy XC - boy am I glad. This is an awesome bike. Comfort increase lets me ride farther, faster and FUNNER ! Word of caution - I'm a big guy and folded the seat pod assembly. Specialized has redesigned it and replaced under warranty. Only problem was the 3 week wait. Also heard that the rear shocks are failing - any feedback ?. Super happy with all components especially Ground Control rubber and shimano rapidfire. If you have Gripshift be ready to clean and tune LOTS. Can't beat it for the money - hence the awesome rating. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
JOhn
a cross-country rider
from Corona Del Mar, Calif
Date Reviewed: June 23, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Hey all this is a 4 month update on the AIM GC Pro. When i bought the bike i thought that by adding a Judy XC and the higher rate rear spring to the Coupe Deluxe i had done everything i could. Well i was wrong. recent upgrades include XT V brakes and levers and a Long Travel kit for the XC. THe braking difference is noticable with the addition of the parrallel push mechanism. The brakes have resulted in having to get a second set of tires. Went with the Team Master/Control set up again. When i was desending i noticed that the front end was squirrely on fast or technical desents. It was the ruts that were determining where the front wheel went. i t was suggested that if i added a LT kit to the Judy XC it would Lacks the headtube angle and make the bike a bit more stable. The LT kit installed did change the geometry. However it didnt change it enough to harm the climbing or nimblness of the bike. With the addition of the LT kit i did have to re adjust the suspension to get it to work together. The bike works very well now that i have roughly 3.14 inches of travel in the front combined with the 2.8 in the rear.For you out there with the indys look into the LT kit. As far as i know they add the same amount of travel as the judy kits. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
christopher ulm
a downhiller
from me/nh
Date Reviewed: June 7, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
great product-- FOR SALE MONTY TRIALS BIKE W HYDRALIC MAGURA FAT TYRES RETAIL 1000 RIDDEN INCE $550....603-964-5445 CHRIS | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Sam Gramlich
a cross-country rider
from Dayton, OH
Date Reviewed: June 6, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
This is the 1 month follow up. I have about 100 miles on the bike, and everything still works! So far only one mechanical problem, a loose bb cup. Fixed by shop for free in 10 minutes. Been on everything from stairs to steep very muddy trails with 5+ inch ruts, and absolutely don't understand how folks live without a rear suspension. You just gotta try going down a flight of stairs and NOT feeling it. At all. Anyway I'm stoked because it was a lot of CASH for the weight and this bike has exceeded my expectations. Beginning to like the stiff rear end-it handles great and totally isolates me from the hits. Try it if you're looking at full suspension. Upgrading from a 4 chili to 5 chili. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ric Petrich
a weekend warrior
from Grand Rapids, MN
Date Reviewed: June 5, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
This bike is very sweet. I am heavy, so the stiff suspension feels about right. What I especially like is the 23.7 top tube (20.5 frame) without increasing standover height. I like technical riding, and ride in Minnesota, Colorado, and Arizona (the Elephant Head trail is the best technical/trials trail in America). The bike climbs well, descends well, and the brakes allow one-finger braking. My only complaint is the Preparation-H seat - I put a real one on and it took care of it. I tried over a dozen full suspension bikes, and this one is the best for technical riding. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Phillip
a cross-country rider
from Greensboro, NC
Date Reviewed: May 31, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Wow! I just got back from my first ride and have definately made the right decision. I was also looking at the GT LTS-2 but chose the GC AIM Pro. It has an Indy SL, I swapped the LX shifters for XT's and a 120mm Syncros for the 130mm OEM stem. With the Mavic 220's, GC Team Control/Master tires and, XT all around (except LX brakes and front derailleur) this is one sweet ride.Drop offs that were scary or unrideable (to me) were a piece of cake today. It soaks up wash board ruts climbs better than my stolen Jamis Aurora (chromoly). The only biopacing, was felt when I would stand up and hammer up a really steep short climb. Otherwise, there was NONE!!! It is slightly noisy because of the gas tank like down tube, but this would be the only complaint. It has a way-cool color scheme (yellow/black/gray/red) and feels lighter than the 26.5 lb Jamis (even though it is 27.4 lb).If you are even thinking of a full suspension bike, put this first on your list to evaluate! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
FAT eddie
a cross-country rider
from San Jose, CA
Date Reviewed: May 28, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I actually have the one up model (Pro), and after a few minor upgrades the bike is a stellar handling bike. Decent weight, about 26 or so if I had to take a guess. Great on singletrack and fast fireroads. Get this one...Now! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dave
a cross-country rider
from South Carolina
Date Reviewed: May 26, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Just got a 97 Comp today! After much debating on which type of bike to get I ended up w/ this one(availability had a thing or two, to do w/ the decision!) After one 12mile, muddy, rutty ride: I'm convinced I made a good choice. Front shock doesn't work too great (indy XC), but the rear feels great! Had the Gripshifts changed to LX rapidfire, added bar ends, and after the ride today, a WTB saddle is next!!!, My bike weighs in a tad under 28, but feels lighter thatn my heavy 27lbs hardtail! Anyway, the jury is still out, but first impressions rate 4 stars! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Sam Gramlich
a cross-country rider
from Dayton OH
Date Reviewed: May 25, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Picked up the 1997 Aim A1 Comp a couple weeks ago. The 18 has pretty quick handling, and I didn't have to swap any stem's etc, to get good feel. Rear shock is pretty stiff, and Rock Shox only seems to make one lighter gauge, a 350 x 2, instead of the OEM 400 x 2. Front travel is fine for my body weight (155). Thought it was spec'd pretty good for $1150. Weighs 30 pounds exact, with bottle cages and reflectors--not bad for a FS. Would get a five chili, but the stock grip shift and stiff rear end knock it back. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dan
a cross-country rider
from USA
Date Reviewed: May 23, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I got the GC Aim Comp w/some upgrades. I swapped the indy for a Judy XC and ditched the saddle for my San Marco Squadra, but aside from that, everything is stock. I've ridden her pretty hard, and can say that she's performed admirably. She climbs as good, if not better than my hard tail, and can blow down moderately rocky sections. My only gripe is that the pivots have begun squeaking like crazy after a muddry ride. Anyone else have this problem or no of a cure? If so, let me know (leed.chro@gao.gov). | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Scott Power
a racer
from fresno
Date Reviewed: May 13, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
This bike is great. Although I changed just about every component that comes on the bike. I am a clysdale racer. I do everything from hillclimb, downhill and cross-country racing on this bike. If you buy one you should put a judy DH on the front. With it the bike is perfectly balanced. Of course, I did upgrade the rear shock to a coupe deluxe for rebound adjustment. I have yet to have a mechanical problem with the bike and I've had it know for 3 months. My other bike I was replacing parts left and right. Not to mention the other bike flexed alot. This bike is a stiff as anything I've ever ridden. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Betsy
a
from Utah
Date Reviewed: May 13, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I have a '97 Ground Control Comp. I upgraded to 800 x-ray Grip Shifts, a Terry women's seat (great!!!) and the long travel kit on the Indy XC. The bike climbs great, and I haven't noticed bobbing. It's comfortable for me (5'6 on the 15.5 frame). The stock suspension was too stiff on the front and rear. Rock Shox said to swap out the rear spring from a 350x2 to a 250x2. They'll switch the part for no charge and the LBS will do the labor no charge. What a deal. The front is more difficult since it already has the short SRA and it's on the plushest setting (leaving no room for adjustment). Rock Shox suggested I switch to the light spring (marked with red paint instead of the medium spring marked with yellow paint). This should be an inexpensive option to try, and can easily be done at home with a 22 mm socket wrench. Outside of needing to make so many adjustments to the suspension, my only real complaint is with the shifting. At first, I had a lot of problems with ghost shifting and it threw the chain a couple times and broke a chain. I thought some of this problem was just the cables stretching since they were new. After riding it for awhile and numerous adjustments, the problems persist, but now the ghost shifting is mainly limited to times I am on the small ring on front and climbing. Also some problems getting onto the small ring at all. A few other minor complaints--my feet hit the bottom of the frame when pedaling sometimes, also, the tires have just the right spacing between the knobs that they throw small rock and gravel up, into the gearing (bad!!) and onto my legs and chest. Seems every dirt road/trail I ride in Utah has these small rocks, so I may have to change out these tires. I am giving only 3 chilis because of all the shifting problems. When and if I can get those fixed, it would be 4 chilis. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jim Peet
a weekend warrior
from england
Date Reviewed: May 8, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
After only two weeks, i am besotted by this bike. I have transferred from my hard tail like a duck to water. In fact i can whoop my mates ass, even on his STS. I did however switch to rapidfire & a judy DH. If you're on a budget and want a steed that'll perform well downhill & cross country, then this is the one. However Specialized have apparantly ceased production so there are'nt many still around. So i'd grab the first one you see. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Tanner Claridge
a weekend warrior
from Spokane Wa
Date Reviewed: May 7, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Verry nice. I just picked up a '97 Ground Control AIM Pro. I put on some Marzocchi Bombers on it. What a bike! The rear end is fairly plush, although not as plush as an LTS or something. The Bombers are absolutely awesome. I have no complaints except that it is a tank (very heavy). | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Brint DeVilling
a cross-country rider
from Vancouver, WA
Date Reviewed: May 5, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
This review is for the G. C. AIM 1, $900For the money, this is the ride to have. I weigh 220 so the fork (indy C) is way cheesy, but I knew this before buying the bike. I plan to relplace it with a Judy SL or XC. I transferred my XT/XTR from my old bike and put all the OEM on my wife's bike. Anyway, the bike handles like a dream. It climbs with very little suspension bob. It eats up the medium bumps and water bars as if they were not there. The rear spring is probably pretty heavy for those who are lighter in the britches, but works well for me. I highly recommend at least test riding this bike, you will not be let down. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
erik
a cross-country rider
from Pittsburgh
Date Reviewed: April 28, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Can't beat this bike for the price. Only complaint is
that the Rear shock is very stiff. This doesn't make
any sense with a Indy xc up front (for light riders
only). I upgraded fork to indy sl. I plan to switch
out the rear spring for a lighter one. Other than
that, this bike is ready to go. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bill Hardin
a cross-country rider
from Spokane WA.
Date Reviewed: April 24, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I just purchased the A-1 2 months a go I already have over 350 miles and a race under it's tires. I love it so far. I do wish it was more like the FSR with the extra rear suspension link. I did do some changing when I bought the bike. First I put LX rapid-fire,Answer DH bar, and a WTB SST saddle on it. This made the perfect fit. I have had some problems with ghost shifting when I was climbing. To cure that a Rollamige on it. After these improvements this bike screams down the fire roads and ascends single track like a deer. I do plan to upgrade the forks next year. I feel the the Rock Shock Tango Theory is all Hype. As for the Dia-comp brakes Watch out. The second week I hade the bike I had to slamm on the brakes because of a car and I became a Urban Farm Boy. I tried to plow the street with my face. After all is said and done i still would rate this bike as one of the best for the buck. After doing the changes I still got out of the shop a just over $1300.00 | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Javier
a cross-country rider
from Puebla, Mexico
Date Reviewed: April 15, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I have just finished to put its first 200 miles in my GC A1 comp, so I can tell you about the bike. First two rides: NIGHTMARE !! the front suspension was too soft, (I weight 150 lb, so I don't understand why people say that is to stiff, they must weight under 100 lb!! or are looking for a Cadillac ride) so in both rides I went over the bars, and the Gripshift did not help at all (rapidfire is the way). After changeing the front suspension inner spacers, now the suspension works Ok and I started to enjoy the bike performance climbing and downhill. It's a well balanced bike, light and you get above average components for its price, so if you are thinking in getting an affordable FS don't think it twice, GO AND GET IT NOW !!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Harvey
a cross-country rider
from Victoria, Vancouver Island, B.C.
Date Reviewed: April 14, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Ground Control A1 Pro or maybe a better name should be the widow maker.
I recently demo-ed this bike for a two hour ride (as well as the Gary Fisher Joshua) because I have read so many good things about it and thought it would be a perfect upgrade to the ridged bike I now ride. There are some good things I liked about this bike but also some bad. To start with I don’t like to crash because at over 40 it becomes harder to mend. One of the things that attracted me to full suspension is the fact that it is easier on your body. The problem was that the A1 was so stiff that it didn’t feel much different than my hard tail. I was also not impressed with the Indy XL front shock (also very stiff). The real problem seemed to be with the Specialized Team Control and Team Master tires, these things have received good reviews but in the west coast conditions I was riding in they are DANGEROUS! My first mishap occurred on the first down hill segment of a trail I am very familiar with, the tires just did not have any bite and I consequently ending up on my back in the bush. I tried letting out some air but this did not seem to help. These tires were just plan scary, they would bounce off every little rock, root and log on the trail. Other negatives: the frame made a lot of strange noise, the LX front derailleur was not set up correctly (would not shift into the middle ring) and the V brakes were very sensitive and noisy (squeals).
On the plus side the bike felt light and was very responsive. I found that I could ride faster going both up and down hills (although the tires made this very exciting).
In conclusion I don’t really know if I like this bike or not. I would like to try it again with better tires (for west coast conditions) and with the suspension better tuned to my weight. I think that the handling and brakes need some getting used to but this could be a really great bike. Maybe.
P.S. The down hill on the Gary Fisher was a real blast (to dangerous on the A1).
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bill Donley
a cross-country rider
from San Luis Obispo, Ca, Usa
Date Reviewed: April 13, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Made the mistake of going by our local dealers, after a brutal ride on my hardtail. Tried the Trek Y, tried this, no contest! Maybe the difference isn't as marked in the upper level ones, but on this, how does specialized do it for the money? 4 rides later, still convinced. Climbs well, tracks very well on fast fireroads, very accurate thru tight single track, and saved my butt a couple'o times when I got stupid! Not convinced on the Gripshift. I'll try the usual stuff,and see if I'm happier with it. The Indy C is awesome for the money. Previous was a Mag 21LT. This is as good, and it's a cheap fork! Great bike for the money. I paid $819., on sale. Don't look for them to be on sale often!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Russell Murchie
a cross-country rider
from Melbourne, Australia
Date Reviewed: March 30, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I accidentally placed the same review under the 96' Bike (oops!)
This bike is very cool, pretty light, feels like a hard tail, climbs well, looks damn sexy (especially in red) and is very affordable.
I tried one and put a deposit on it 3 days later, I wasn't even looking for a new bike! Voted by Mountain Bike Action as the
most affordable Full Suspension bike at the Annaheim bike show! | | Overall Rating: |
| |
|
Photo Caption Contest
(sponsored by Maxxis)
|
Enter here
|
|
|
$ 1200.00
