|
|
|
| |
Submitted by
lallen1407
a Downhiller
from Plymouth Ma
Date Reviewed: June 30, 2009 | | Favorite Trail: | Pinehills | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$400.00 | | Purchased At: | cederville cycles | | Strengths: | Everything about this bike is awesome! Originally got ten years ago, put a ton of money into it making it my own "custom" ride and still am riding it. | | Weaknesses: | Nothing | | Bike Setup: | M60 Frame, Judy Race Rock shox, titec hell bent downhill bars, KORE stem, Shimano Vbrakes, panaracer anti snake bite tires, shimano grip shifts. | | Bottom Line: | It recently got stolen from my Boston Apt, but i love it so much i tracked the scum down and got it back. I will ride it until it breaks in half. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
akoho
a Weekend Warrior
from Chico, ca, usa
Date Reviewed: January 31, 2009 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$450.00 | | Bottom Line: | such a great price when purchased. Rode this bike for thousands of miles over the years and now must retire it. Light weight ensured ease in climbs. It handled everything from summer ski slopes to cruisin through the soft redwood singletracks. my first bike love | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris
a Weekend Warrior
from Arlington, VA, USA
Date Reviewed: December 17, 2007 | | Favorite Trail: | M607-608 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$300.00 | | Purchased At: | El Paso Sporting Goods store, name? | | Strengths: | Has good gear range, comfortable ride for rigid mountain bile | | Weaknesses: | Weight, lack of any suspension when off paved roads. | | Similar Products Used: | LL Bean mountain bike, Biachi road bike, Raleigh road bike | | Bike Setup: | Standard package. I've added a rear rack, suspension seat post, WTB seat and Nashbar Rodeo combination pedals. | | Bottom Line: | I initially bought this bike in late 1994. It was used a little for commuting and then mostly sat in storage from 1996 to 1999 and 2000 to 2005. Then I began riding weekends and holidays. Ended up using for longer rides (40 to 55 miles) on a regular basis. It is now my daily commuter bike. It has served me well and has given me no real maintenance problems. This bike is good for anyone looking for an all purpose bike. | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
steve
a Cross Country Rider
from gainesville, fl
Date Reviewed: January 31, 2007 | | Favorite Trail: | humpty dumps | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$400.00 | | Purchased At: | bike route | | Strengths: | Durability man! The frame has withstood YEARS of hard, fast riding. | | Weaknesses: | Had to upgrade wheels, handle bar, and brakes. Otherwise very solid. | | Similar Products Used: | Haro MTB from 1990 | | Bike Setup: | Go Fast riser handle bar, Nuke Proof Supa Fly hubs with mavic rims, Avid brakes, Specialized dirt comp. tires and Manitou Mach 5 Front suspension. | | Bottom Line: | I've ridden this bike now for 11 years! I've demolished wheels, thrashed tires and been through numerous hurricane seasons, but still this bike keeps moving forward. Currently waiting to be re painted and converted to a single speed for my wife. I know these bikes are longer thought of, but i had to write a review, i had to give some luv to the ol' Raleigh M60. So all you M60 riders keep on rollin', | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Davy Wavy
a Racer
from Denton, TX USA
Date Reviewed: May 1, 2006 | | Favorite Trail: | Bar H - St. Jo, TX | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$350.00 | | Purchased At: | Mustang bicycles | | Strengths: | Solid all arounder bike. Upgraded all parts and I have about $1200 in upgrades into this bike. I like the frame and am using the bike currently in MTB racing in TX. I came in 6th overall last season on her. Light, front suspension only. | | Weaknesses: | Hard time finding a fork with a long enough head tube for this bike. Geometry is close to a road bike. | | Similar Products Used: | '04 Specialized Stumpjumper FSR 30th anniversary edition | | Bike Setup: | XT f/r der; XT cranks & BB, Kore stem, Judy XC front shock w/80mm of travel, Easton handlebar, XT V-Brakes, Sun Wheels | | Bottom Line: | Great bike. Took me all over Texas racing, Moab, Colorado and back. Great climber. Able to climb and descend with the best of 'em. I love my bike! I even prefer it over my newer $4000 Stumpjumper! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Lance
a Weekend Warrior
from Dallas, TX, USA
Date Reviewed: June 11, 2002 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$350.00 | | Purchased At: | Sun & Ski Sports | | Strengths: | I bought the bike in 1994. The only things I've replaced are the tires. I've done all the tune up work myself. Only had it serviced once - just readjustment 6 mos. after I bought it. | | Weaknesses: | Had a blow out once and had to walk about 12 miles home...it's pretty heavy when you're hauling it on your back. | | Bike Setup: | Standard. No shox....only real drawback, and the new one's come with front shox standard, I think. I'm about to buy my 2nd. I bought mine in 1994; it's a 1993 model, and I paid about $150 less than the sticker (the bike shop was getting ready to move locations, and I got a GREAT deal!) | | Bottom Line: | Great bike. I'm contemplating buying a new one because my chain skips in high torque situations (either a stretched chain or bent sprocket), and I'm tired of putting new tires on such an old bike. It's in need of a tune up, but I don't want to put any money into it - I'd rather just go out and buy new. I've definitely gotten my money's worth out of this one. This is a GREAT entry level all-terrain bike. If you're looking for lots of technical trail manuevers, go with full-suspension. If you want a bike that will go anywhere (paved or unpaved trails) this is a GREAT bike. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
steph
a
from NY
Date Reviewed: April 30, 2000 | | Duration Product Used: | Tested or demo'ed only | | Bottom Line: | Trying to buy a solid bike, for my first major bike. Dont need anything fancy just something worth my dollaz. Local bike shop is selling M60 for $470. Is it worth the money? | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
parker
a Cross-Country Rider
from kansas city, ks
Date Reviewed: December 24, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
clinton,levee,blue springs | | Duration Product Used: |
more than 3 years | | Strengths: |
never broke, ever | | Weaknesses: |
none, its about a 400$ bike, its gunna weigh alot | | Similar Products Used: |
dean scout, iboc comp | | Bike Setup: |
no shock, stx | | Bottom Line: | the stx shifts better than my deore, its more of a back up/ friend that wants to go along bike, i beat it, it never broke, had to replace front wheel(beat it), its a good entry level bike, but for any mountian stuff, get something with v brakes. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jack
a Weekend Warrior
from L A , California
Date Reviewed: December 9, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
bike path--venice,santa monica | | Duration Product Used: |
less than 1 month | | Strengths: |
light-weight aluminum frame,great upgradeability,comfortable ride and good shimano acera gearing. | | Weaknesses: |
so-so shocks--limited travel,and the stock seat was numbing after five miles but everything in price range was similar in set-up.Raleigh gives the most bang for the buck | | Similar Products Used: |
shwinn moab 3--like NO difference to me... | | Bike Setup: |
Post-Moderne suspension post, standard piece o' dirt rock shox jett shocks till they break! | | Bottom Line: | This is such a light and comfortable bike. It'll do whatever is asked and it's comfy-get a gel seat and the suspension--gawd--like ridin' a light pillow that cooks,downhill and on trails and on bike paths!Cheap to buy...comfy..aluminum and upgradeable??what more can ya ask of a great bike?? buy it! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
louie
a Weekend Warrior
from austin, texas
Date Reviewed: July 13, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
barton creek greenbelt | | Duration Product Used: |
3 months | | Strengths: |
great components for the money, light,strong alum. frame. best real trail bike for the money. | | Weaknesses: |
rst 260 front suspension, which isn't the greatest, but haven't had any problems with them yet. | | Similar Products Used: |
specialized hardrock comp fs | | Bike Setup: |
alivio front, stx-rc rear derailers, grip shift, rst 260 front suspension, kenda kinetic tires | | Bottom Line: | great bike for the $430.00 msrp price tag. shop around i found mine for $379.00. best components for the money, really nice light frame. i highly recommend. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
David
a Weekend Warrior
from Wichita, KS
Date Reviewed: May 19, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Winfield Lake | | Duration Product Used: |
1 Year | | Strengths: |
Light (for steel frame)
Lifetime frame guarantee.
Agile climber (nice geometry)
A lot of bike for low cost. | | Weaknesses: |
Non-replaceable rear hanger. | | Similar Products Used: |
Specialized Hard-Rock Sport
Trek 7000 | | Bike Setup: |
M-60 steel frame w/RST 260 fork (98) | | Bottom Line: | This is a smooth-runnin machine. Very reliable, STRONG frame. I have put this thing through some tough spills on the rocks, and it has always come out smelling like a rose !! Pounded the seat stays against stone HARD, and all I had to do was adjust the brakes !! They did'nt even bend !! If you're looking for an all-around great bike with front susp, and don't want to spend a ton-o-cash..this is the ride for you !! The STX drive train is smooth with easy twist-grip shifting and powerful brakes. I upgraded the saddle with WTB and shortened the stem with 100mm Tahoma, and all is good. A solid performer. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Brian Hileman
a weekend warrior
from Porterville, CA. U.S.A.
Date Reviewed: February 14, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
I've had my '98 M80 for almost a year now, what a superb piece of machine! Every weld on this bike screams Quality. With the upgraded Manatou SX fork, and LX V brakes, there is not a trail anywhere I cant blow the dust on! Next upgrade will be the wheels and pedals, and this one is a long time keeper!
My local bike shop was kind enough to swap me a Bontranger seat for the stock one. Try to catch me on the fire roads up in Hot Springs...This bike deserves about 20 flamin' hot red chrome Peppers | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Thomas Aden
a cross-country rider
from Pleasant Dale NE
Date Reviewed: October 10, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought my 1996 M-60 for $400.00. It is a little heavier than other bikes, but it works great. It climbs very well, and the geometry feels great. The only down side are the wheels, which bend eaisly. You put a low-end fork on this bike and it's ready to go. You will most defenitly get the most bang for the buck with Raleigh. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
wayne
a weekend warrior
from jonesboro, AR
Date Reviewed: August 25, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
our local police dept bought two and after trying an m60 i loved it and bought one myself it has an rst 260 front suspension fork that is a joy on moderate terrain. Its solid and has to be though not an experienced rider im an excited one that measzures in at 6'2 and 290. i hzave had to have the rims trued once and need to again but other than that it has ben one of the best investmsnet i have ever made... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
B. Hershey
a weekend warrior
from PA
Date Reviewed: July 28, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I recently got '97 M60 left-over with a Q5 shock for $325. Great bike for me as a beginner, incredible price. The M60 has a smooth ride, decent brakes, and handles well on rough trails. A shock and decent components for that price: I could not ask for more. I would suggest this bike for anyone starting out in the sport. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mike
a weekend warrior
from Houston, TX
Date Reviewed: July 16, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I am currently looking at the M-60 for a future purchase. My budget says that I can spend up to $450 on a mountain bike. I'm not too sure whether or not I need the front suspension. Also, is this the best bike that I can get for $450????? Looking for some advice!!!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bob Cofer
a weekend warrior
from Sultan, WA
Date Reviewed: July 15, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
How come there isn't an M-80 review page?!
Just bought a '98 M-80. What a dream! Nice and light, aluminum frame,
stx/stx-rc and an Indy shock for $525.00 at LBS. Only complaints are a
crappy set of bars and brakes. Changed the bar and put on a set of
Velocity Aeroheat wheels, next will upgrade the brakes. The frame is
pretty stout and seems to be holding up well to my abuse. Seat is kind
of narrow for long sessions in the saddle but works well on the trail. I've put about 150 miles on it in the last couple of days and don't
have any gripes. Had to have the bottom bracket tightened when I first
got it. Loose from the factory! If you want to have a fairly light, quick steering, well equiped bike
for not too much cash this is the one. See you on the trails of Washington.
P.S. Try Wallace Falls State Park. What a hoot! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
J.N.H.
a weekend warrior
from San Diego, CA
Date Reviewed: July 8, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have heard several people mention the Main Frame being Chro-Mo, and the rear being carbon steel. I was told that the '95 model year had a carbon steel rear section, and the '96 model was all Chro-Mo. Any truth to this? I bought the 96 model for this reason. The bike has held up well so far, but is heavy as hell. The crank creaks a lot too. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
A.J.
a racer
from St.Paul MN
Date Reviewed: June 27, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I recently purchased a M-80 for $499. i rode it for a couple months and deciede to try my luck with racing. Scince the M-80 was the only bike I had I raced it. In that race I took 1st. then the next race I finished in 3rd place. I'm really happy with the M-80 it handeled the punishment I put it through. I suggest that if you are a beginner this bike is perfect for you. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jesse
a weekend warrior
from Earth
Date Reviewed: June 6, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I am shopping for a new bike i went from store to store looking at prices for conponets and looks it came down to the M60 and the Trek 820 SHK The Trek is good bu has no bar ends I will soon buy the M60 and will be glad idid I give it a 5 stars fo sure | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ron
a weekend warrior
from Iowa
Date Reviewed: May 27, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I just purchased a '98 M-80 a short time ago and I'm very satisfied with it.
I shopped around and compared the components with other Mt. bikes and found
the Raleigh to have the most for the least. Seat isn't the most comfortable
and will be my first upgrade but overall it's a excellent beginner bike, especially for $375.00.
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Brandon Claborn
a cross-country rider
from Stillwater, OK
Date Reviewed: April 22, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I weigh 210 lbs and other than bending the handle bars and wasting the fork, the bike has held up well. Mine is a 96 model, full STX all the way around. Not a bad bike for under $500. The only problem is you can sacrifice some on the components and get a shock for the same money. It you are riding rough terrain, you'll certainly notice. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
J.C.
a weekend warrior
from Tosa,Wi.
Date Reviewed: April 7, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Just bought an M-80. It replaced an old (I hate to say it) a Huffy.Hey, it was all I could afford at the time. This M-80 is a great overall bike. Good savings and great components. But as i've read in other reviews the seat sucks.It seems to get the best of my personal parts on rough rides. I like the shifting (smooth) and I have a ROCKSHOX Q-5 which I have yet to find out how it fares. Maybe alittle heavy but I'm used to riding a sherman tank,so this seems like a dream. Great starter bike.1 deduction for the seat. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ken
a
from weekend warrior
Date Reviewed: March 29, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought my M80 in December (1998 model-aluminum frame Rockshox S fork). I did it without knowing much about Mt Bikes. I just wanted something to poke around on some trails nearby. When my R600 was totaled in an accident, I started using the M80 as a commuter. The bike handles really well is a lot of fun. Because of its design, I can ride the trails on my way to and from work. Thank god we have a shower, or I would have a heck of time explaining the muddy face. I can't say whether it is better than another bike of the same type as I never comparison shopped. However, I feel I have gotten an excellent value for my money and the bike is holding up very well to some fairly heavy use. I have 500 miles on it now. I also can cruise it for about 35 miles at a time. I know this is a Mountain Bike page but if anyone is a Road Bike fan, the R600 is an outstanding value. You cannot find a triple with Shimano 105 equipment for anywhere near the price. I am replacing the one I totalled (actually the other person's insurance is replacing it!). | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ryan Kildee
a weekend warrior
from Houghton, MI
Date Reviewed: February 24, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought a 97 M-60 this summer after trying out trek, specialized, and GT and the M-60 is an awesome bike for the price. Other than cantilever brakes it has great components and is relatively light for a cro-mo bike. I added a Judy DH fork and now its a haul ass plush-mobile. Don't get an M-80 with cheapo shocks, get an M-60 with real shocks. You won't be disappointed. A bargain flyer. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Steve Steele
a cross-country rider
from Beale Air Force Base Ca
Date Reviewed: January 31, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have owned a 94 M60 for 3 years. I have beaten the hell out of it. It is o
one of the best values in MT biking. I put over 3500 miles and rode it every
day. I have blown away many of my friends on more expensive front and rear shocked bikes. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Fritz
a weekend warrior
from Florida
Date Reviewed: January 26, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought a used M-60 a few months ago. It's gray with CroMoly main tubes. Does anyone know how to tell what year it is?
So far it's been a pretty good ride. I haven't had any problems so far except for the pedals. One sticks and the other makes a clicking noise. I'll eventually get around to replacing them. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Tim Gatherum
a cross-country rider
from Penacook NH
Date Reviewed: January 21, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have the vesion of this bike but with a Rock Shox Quadra 5. It was around $550. i'm really happy with it. It has a geat mix of Shimano STX componets. The tires are a little slippery though. I would recomend this bike for someone that wants more that a Murry but not readdy for a expensive one. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
jeremy
a cross-country rider
from tn
Date Reviewed: January 19, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I just started getting into racing when i left the country for a year. when i got back, i outgrew my bike. this actually was a turn for the better when i got the m-60. it is a great starter bike with a few exceptions. 1-the weight. if you are not a serious racer, then this isn't a problem. the 98's are aluminum, so that problem is solved. 2- the components. the bike should really have had v-brakes, but i put some shimano lx v-brakes on which really improved the performance. the stx front also skips off the lowest chain ring if put under extreme torque, and that cost me a couple of places in my last race ( i am planning to replace it with a lx unit later on.) after i bent the fork on a car, i replaced it with a rockshox indy c. DON'T GO FOR THE M-80. the Q5 just isn't worth it. the 98's have an indy s, but the indy c is still better. the pedals also got to me, which i will replace with time atac pedals shortly. the seatpost slips for me, (i weigh 145, which isn't much) but besides that, an awsome bike. i fully recomend this bike for any beginning racers.
four chile peppers for this great bike. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ky
a weekend warrior
from Colby, WI
Date Reviewed: December 17, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Think it kick ass. I added a front shock to my M-60 cause my other one broke. In future years i plan to add a rear shock.
I ride around town year and only had one problem with in winter and thats somthing froze up and my cranks don't grab so I can't get anywhere. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ken
a weekend warrior
from Tallahassee, FL
Date Reviewed: November 18, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Recently bought two '97 M-60s on closeout at $325 -- the first for my daughter's 14th birthday and the second for myself. (Interestingly, 1997 M-50's were the same price.) Shopped all the other major brands and nothing else came anywhere near the value. After bringing my daughter's bike home, it only took a few days of being amazed every time I walked by it to convince me to buy myself one. This is not a cruiser or a mountain-style hybrid (like the M-50). The '97 model (unlike earlier years) is full cromoly, including the stays (main tubes are not DB, but they are large OS), and it has high quality components throughout (STX/STX-RC drivetrain, Aheadset, Grip Shift 400 SRT, Selle Stratos seat, alloy bar ends, etc., but no V-brakes). Similarly priced bikes had components two or more steps below those on this bike, and similarly equipped bikes cost $500 or more. My daughter's 16.5 weighs in at just a hair over 26#. I ride almost exclusively on trails, and I am very pleased with the ride and handling. It feels very solid, and I would not hesitate to take it anywhere. It may not be cutting edge technology, but it is an absolutely outstanding value. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Charles
a weekend warrior
from NC
Date Reviewed: October 27, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought an M-80 as a starter bike. That is exactly what it is. The quality is impeccable and sturdy, nut man is this thing heavy! Good components, however it is somewhat limited by the Quadra 5 shock. The '98 is much better, has a 24 spd system, indy series shock and v-brakes straight out of the factory! This is a whole different bike, oh yeah, it's in aluminum now too, which helps the weight problem. ANyone starting out, go for it, if your looking for higher end stuff, look at the m-400 and up from raleigh. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Heather Nelson
a weekend warrior
from Massachusetts
Date Reviewed: October 18, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
This just one more review for the M-80. I bought my Raleigh from a dealer while on vacation in New Hampshire and was riding a Diamondback Wildwood at the time. It was a tank compared to the M-80. I really like the ride it gives me and i have been giving it quite a wookout. I find it does well in the technical stuff. My previous bike was a beast because it was considered a cruiser' class. I have had nothing but good luck with the M-80! I highly reccomend it to anybody!!
Good price too-at 500-600 dollars, you can't beat the deal. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bill
a weekend warrior
from Ohio
Date Reviewed: October 14, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Yep, another M80 review, except my bike isn't even an M80. Its a Nishiki Colorado which is the same thing.
This is my second mountain bike. The first was a Trek 800. They don't really compare. Everytime I took the Trek on a trail, I had to fix something. Other than truing the wheels I haven't had a problem with the Nishiki all summer. Went on real trails about every other week for the first 2 or 3 months, one 30 mile ride and lots of 5 to 10 mile rides. The bike is kind of heavy I guess, but until I get down to 0% body fat, I'm not going to sweat the 3 or 4 lbs. I could shave off for another couple hundred bucks at the bike shop.
I bought some mail order dia-compe 737 v-brakes and DP7 levers. They are much better than the original brakes @ $40.
I am thinking about the speedstrut inserts for the Q5's. Any opinions?
Only peeve is the front water bottle mount on the 16.5 frame can only fit the smaller bottles. I guess if I didn't try to use the beast for a road machine...
Good bike for the buck. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Allain
a
from NYC
Date Reviewed: October 10, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Looking for a good starter bike without a huge cash investment? The M60 is an excellent choice. With performance and components found on bikes priced at a bill and a half over, it's something to seriously consider.The frame is made from CroMoly in the main triangle only, resulting in more weight than a fully CroMo construction. However, the overall weight is just over 27 pounds, which is low enough for a great off road ride. No need to stay on light gravel or park paths with this bike. It's an agile, competent ride that will take on rough, rocky, root strewn trails happily. (Though not as sprightly as an eight hundred dollar front suspended aluminum bike.) The frame geometry and handlebar positioning provides comfortable riding while allowing a more aggressive stance than many other low-enders. On shallow and medium climbs, the bike's weight doesn't hinder, but those two extra pounds will tell on long steep ascents. And rocky minefield descents remind you quickly that it's a non-suspension rig. You might want to upgrade to a suspension fork, but I would advise towards getting a mid or high level bike and keep the M60 as a commuter or as loaner to lure your unsuspecting non-dirt friends into the deep dark wood. Downsides? The seatposts, stem and handlebars are no frills aluminum alloy on the 96 model. Raleigh had to cut costs somewhere. Also the frame is not worth upgrading, being only part CroMo and not butted CroMo at that. Better to buy a bike with a better frameset than to pour the cash into lightening this one. The rims are easily put out of true by the mistakes and knocks a new rider can bestow on a bike, especially if he or she is eager for jumping and bunny hopping. Unless you plan to stay on smooth flat horse trails or fire roads, better learn how to true our own wheels.Who should get the M60? Possibly the town or suburban commuter, who deals with varied riding surfaces will appreciate the comfort and ruggedness of this bike. The trail curious definitely, with shallow pockets, or with reservations about the usually high price of admission. This bike is great for getting yourself weaned from the local asphalt and onto the trail. It will bestow the hopeful off roader with enough confidence to build his or her skills and develop educated preferences for the next step up.
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Craig
a weekend warrior
from Dallas TX
Date Reviewed: September 19, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Update on the warranty situation: Raleigh says NO, They will sell me another
steel frame for 150 or aluminum for 200..........but the derail. and dropout
problem is my own tough luck. Keep it in mind when you go to buy, maybe all manufacturers are like this I don't know. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Craig
a weekend warrior
from Dallas TX
Date Reviewed: September 18, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
This is also for the M-80, bought it in may and have been happy. For the money
it is a good bike, however on my last ride the rear derail. went and took the
dropout with it (bent 1/2 inch). So back to the dealer it went and his opinion
was that it could not be fixed and probably was under warranty, but the Raleigh
rep has to make the call. Now I wait for the rep to get in touch with the dealer
........and I don't ride. I will update as to how Raleigh takes care of its customers. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jai Singh
a weekend warrior
from Visalia, CA
Date Reviewed: September 17, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
the Raligh M-80. got it for bout $500, really really nice, everything works just great, taken it out a few times, rides really smooth, i consider it a very good buy.... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Michael
a cross-country rider
from CA
Date Reviewed: September 16, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
well, i'm also writing on a M-80 (mtbr really ought to get their act together and create a catagory for M-80 riders, considering there are like 5 reviews in here for them) anyways, mine's a 96 that i got at the end of the season and its riden great! One word of advice though, put speed springs in the Q5's, its such a dramatic improvement the $50 shouldn't even phase you. anyways its handled great, for cro-mo, its feather weith, in fact, i ride a 22 and i tried my cousin's 22 cannondale out this summer and i could tell the difference in stiffness, so if you want stiff, go aluminum, but the weight difference was minimal. in fact, he though mine was aluminum even after riding it, so don't let yourselves get caught up in the aluminum hysteria. Mountain bike mag just did a test of a decked out cromo bike and found that they liked it as well as any aluminum. only complaint about the bike is that i've had to true my rims a few times, and i've bent them bad enough that i had to have them trued professionally. they're alivio hubs, so they're not great, but it seems like they shouldn't bend as easily as they have, if anyone has any suggestions please write, later | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
stel
a weekend warrior
from kitchener, ont. canada
Date Reviewed: August 17, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
i have a raleigh that isn't listed here, maybe it's a canada only item? a serengeti, cro-mo frame, alivio crank and derailleurs, v brakes, aluminium stem and seatpost and rockshox q5's. the seat really sucks!! the bike is a good trail bike goes downhill as fast as i can handle, really good value for c$ 635.00
anyone with a serengeti email me back with any problems or comments | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mark Salisbury
a weekend warrior
from Rochester NY
Date Reviewed: August 11, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Love it.... great parts/money ratio, kinda wish I'd gotten the
M-80 tho, suspension fork might have been worth an extra $90compared it to GT Tempest whin I bought it, yes could had
aluminum for extra $45, but the price was crappy components...
decided to go with better shifting and Cro-Mo | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ben Hollick
a weekend warrior
from Mt. Pleasant, MI
Date Reviewed: July 25, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
This is a review of the M-80, pretty much the same bike except with STX FD and
STX-RC RD. I just bought this '97 for 500 out the door and love it. Of course
I have to ride it more and see how it holds up especially with a Q5 front shock.
But I will post a new review if the bike goes bad. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Grant Morris
a cross-country rider
from Texas
Date Reviewed: July 14, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
This was the first bike I bought since I was in grade school. I used it on trails and soon found out that it wasn't enough bike for me. It's a good bike to do light trail riding. It is a good value, but for anyone who thinks they might want to really get into the sport, you may want to look elsewhere. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dave
a cross-country rider
from New Hampshire
Date Reviewed: July 12, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Since there are no sections for the M200 (an M60 in aluminum), I'll share my thoughts here. I looked at everything, Trek, GT, Specialized, Ficher, Canonndale, etc. No one could offer the same value. I grabbed mine for $429 at Cycles, etc in Salem, NH. The ike is great, with two exceptions: 1. front brake squeal ( the shop is working w/ Shimano on this), and 2. I get an occasional chain skip. Once we find the offending link, that should resolve itself.....
This bike is truly an excellent value (as was that first Raleigh with the monkey bars 15 years ago). I weigh 210 on a good week, and the bike feels solid. Also, the aluminum frame offsets about 2 lbs of the M60's weight issues.
For what it's worth, I also found the LBS, Cycles etc to be willing to answer a bazillion questions, and go the extra distance.5 chilis here.
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Doyle Hamilton
a weekend warrior
from Wichita KS
Date Reviewed: May 31, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought the M60 as my first mountain bike and have been very happy. Any other Trek or Giant at the dealers around here were about $100 more similarly equipped. I've had it about 2 years now, and it still rides like a champ. I did dump the straps and slapped on a pair of Shimano 323 pedals tho. My dealer left out a washer on the handlebars during assembly, which caused an occasional popping noise, but Harley's Schwinn in Hutchinson fixed me up for a couple bucks. I've been thinking about going to suspension, but can't bring myself to get rid of the M60. A great starter bike!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
BullDog
a weekend warrior
from Chicago, IL
Date Reviewed: May 9, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Only had mine for approx three weaks (equal to six small - street - rides and one longer - 14 miles, path - rides) and no real complaints so far. Only problem is that it seems to want to shift itself out of 10th gear. Anyone else had that problem? Besides that, I stand 6'2, and 230 lbs, and the bike drives like a Ferrari. It feels strong, solid, and well worth it's low price, based on what it brings to you! Looking for some rough trails now, to really break it in! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
joe jones
a racer
from america
Date Reviewed: April 19, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
nice bike i bought two last year and they really hold up the weight is preety bad tough | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kendall
a weekend warrior
from Seattle, WA
Date Reviewed: April 16, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
My review is on the M-80 (M-60 plus Quadra 5 fork with grip shift). I've
had it for a year and a half now and have taken it to hell and back.
Overall, a good beginner bike and definately a good value--I got mine
for $450. But if you're looking for a featherweight, this one's a porker.
For someone who doesn't mind pulling an extra 4 or 5 pounds around and
wants to buy a bike for a fair price, look no further. But if you're
planning to enter a few races and/or want to upgrade, buy something else.
I've stepped up to a Klein Pulse Comp II and was shocked at the weight
difference. The trusty steed goes on the market soon but it'll be a
sad day when I say goodbye :(. 5 peppers for the ride and value but
lose one for the weight. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
GRIZ
a weekend warrior
from Auburn, Washington USA
Date Reviewed: March 30, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
After shopping around for several months, I finally decided on the M-60 to replace my stolen Technium. OVERALL, Raleigh
seems to be the best value for the dollar that I have found. While I don't really thrash my bike, I am rather large at 220lbs, and
this bicycle has been everything that I thought it would be. The components are good. The frame is good. The dealer, Milton
Cyclery in Milton Washington is very good. I have absolutely no complaints. I shopped Trek, Cannondale, and several
others. Overall, for the weekend warrior, I rate this bike an excellent value for the dollar. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Robert
a weekend warrior
from Arlington, TX
Date Reviewed: March 30, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I just bought two Raleigh M 60's for my wife and I. I used to ride BMX and loved bikes many years ago. Wanting to return
to the great outdoors and the track, I have taken up Mountain Biking. But buying two bikes at once can be a bit of a burden
on the wallet. That's why I love these bikes. With full Chro-Moly main frame, forks, and main stays, Shimano XTR front and
rear derailers, and GripShifters, this is a great bike for the money. At 28 lbs, it isn't too heavy, and it has a unipue bottom tube
that adds to its style. The bike's suggested retail is around $420, but it has the frame and components of bikes costing over
$500. It rides smooth, and is very responsive. After jumping on, it will feel like an extension of your body in a matter of
minutes! Great feel, great price for the bike package. If you're looking to get started in mountain biking like we are, it offers a
'real' mountain bike at reasonable price. Robert | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kevin
a weekend warrior
from Lapeer, MI
Date Reviewed: March 26, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I really like this bike. It feels as good as any $800 bike but for half the price. I had a problem with the forks after a harsh ride but they replaced them with no problem. Thanks to Grand Blanc Cycle for the great price | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
GRIZ
a weekend warrior
from Auburn, Washington USA
Date Reviewed: December 2, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
After shopping around for several months, I finally decided on the M-60 to
replace my stolen Technium. OVERALL, Raleigh seems to be the best value for
the dollar that I have found. While I don't really thrash my bike, I am rather
large at 220lbs, and this bicycle has been everything that I thought it would be.
The components are good. The frame is good. The dealer, Milton Cyclery in
Milton Washington is very good. I have absolutely no complaints. I shopped
Trek, Cannondale, and several others. Overall, for the weekend warrior, I rate
this bike an excellent value for the dollar. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kenny Kwong
a weekend warrior
from Winchester, MA
Date Reviewed: October 1, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
The bike has a good frame and is good for it's money. It is kind of heavy but
if you upgrade your components, it'll get lighter. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
D. S. Willis
a weekend warrior
from Auburn, Wa.
Date Reviewed: August 27, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
Just replaced my stolen Raleigh Technium with a M-60 Raleigh. Must say that for the price(379.00), and the components, the Raleigh was the best thing going. We just returned from a one day MOUNTAIN TRIP and the Raleigh performed without any complaints. I am not a competitor and don't have exceptionally high requirements, however, after shopping around and looking at MANY bicycles, I can say that for the money the STX equipped Raleigh M-60 is and great value.
I am in the 220 plus lbs. range and I need a strong bike. The Raleigh comes through like a trooper. My hat is off to Raleigh and to the dealer that set it up, Milton Cylcerly. GOOD JOB! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
D.S.Willis
a weekend warrior
from Auburn, WA
Date Reviewed: August 27, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
Kudos to Raleigh for the components available in a $400 dollar bike, (STX) , and Kudos to Milton Cyclery for bending over backwards to please it's customers. | | Overall Rating: |
| |
|
Photo Caption Contest
(sponsored by Maxxis)
|
Enter here
|
|
|
$ 420.00
