|
|
|
| |
Submitted by
Chretien
a Cross Country Rider
from Barcelona, Spain
Date Reviewed: April 15, 2008 | | Favorite Trail: | Gava | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$800.00 | | Purchased At: | Mexico City (1997) | | Strengths: | Very stron and stiff frame. Have it for 10 years with original components, exept for couple of chain replacements en cables. Very light and easy to ride. | | Weaknesses: | Although I still have all the original components on this bike, when biking nowadays, I feel coming short. RD is 8 speed, shifting is not as smooth as used to be, and pedals were not clipless. | | Similar Products Used: | Trek | | Bike Setup: | All original | | Bottom Line: | Would recommend this bike (brand) to anyone. As a matter of fact, will get Cannondale Prophet this year. Green paint job is still on, even after more than 10 years of trail riding, communting, xc, lots of plane trips and having tossed an bike trail all over the world. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Tim
a Weekend Warrior
from Lambertville, NJ
Date Reviewed: April 27, 2004 | | Favorite Trail: | Sourland Mountains | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$800.00 | | Purchased At: | Eddy's Bike Shop, Stowe, OH | | Strengths: | Great frame well built very durable. Also the component set at the time was very high quality. | | Weaknesses: | I had the IRC Mythos XC, blackwall, 26 x 2.1” replaced with a specialized tire and I also reinforced the back wheel using an upgraded sun rim from about 2002. But the rim lasted 4 years so it was alright. | | Similar Products Used: | Various Mountain Bikes fuji --> kona --> gary fisher | | Bike Setup: | F500 Specs
Frame CAAD2 Mountain
Fork HeadShok P-Bone M
Rear Shock n/a
Rims Sun AT-18, 32 hole
Hubs Sachs Centera
Spokes DT Swiss stainless steel, 15 gauge
Tires IRC Mythos XC, blackwall, 26 x 2.1”
Pedals Wellgo LU-955-A w/aluminum cage
Crank CODA CF, 22/32/42
Chain Sachs SC-40, Black
Rear Cogs Shimano Hyperglide 8-speed, 11-30
Bottom Bracket Shimano BB-LP27
Front Derailleur Shimano STX-RC
Rear Derailleur Shimano LX
Shifters Sachs Powergrip Plus
Handlebars CODA Expert
Stem CODA HeadShok Front Loader
Headset CODA HeadShok
Brakeset TX-22 Side pull canti with LC-26 levers
Saddle CODA 500M
Seatpost Kalloy SP-263B
Colors Viper Red (RED), Split Pea (PEA)
Sizes S, M, L, X
| | Bottom Line: | If you find a split pea green get it just make some adjustments and you'll have an awesome bike on your hands. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Patrick
a Weekend Warrior
from Richmond Va.
Date Reviewed: February 19, 2004 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$699.00 | | Purchased At: | Agees Bicycles | | Strengths: | one hell of a frame. Indy C still going strong | | Weaknesses: | Little skimpy on the origional components | | Similar Products Used: | gary fisher | | Bike Setup: | upgraded to xt 9 speed drive train, upgraded xt v-brakes, new bontrager rims, coda stem, crowbar handlebars and other mods | | Bottom Line: | The frame and even the Indy C forks have lasted through everything I have thrown at it. Not a bad deal in '98 when i bought it and even though the only origional items on the bike are the frame and forks, this bike still kicks a**. I would by it all over again. Well worth the money! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Imran
a Weekend Warrior
from Augusta, GA
Date Reviewed: September 16, 2003 | | Favorite Trail: | modoc | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$650.00 | | Purchased At: | Chain Reaction | | Strengths: | All around great package, durable as hell | | Weaknesses: | ....hmmm.......uhh...... | | Similar Products Used: | n/a | | Bike Setup: | new rear rim, bar ends, egg beaters, the rest standard | | Bottom Line: | the f500 is definitely one of the best damn bikes around...i've had it for over 4 years and have only had to replace parts because of wear and tear...a solid package, and a steal at $650...i would definitely recommend a Cannondale to anyone looking for an all around great package...they might seem a little steep at first but it's worth it in the long run!!! oh and definitely go clipless, the pedals my '98 came with didnt do justice to the rest of the bike | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
jp
a Weekend Warrior
from maricopa,az usa
Date Reviewed: June 4, 2001 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$800.00 | | Strengths: | Frame, Frame Geometry, Price | | Weaknesses: | Components | | Similar Products Used: | Treh 850, Trek 7000 | | Bike Setup: | Indy C Fork instead of Head Shock, else stock. | | Bottom Line: | What a sweet deal this was. The first year this bike was introduced, it came thrlough with the fork for a whole lot less $ than the Head Shock. The fram is stiff and just great. It's got just enough acceleration and responsiveness for my needs. I use it on everything from the desert and rocks to the pine forests up north. However, the base compnentry that came with this was marginal. As each failed, I replaced them. I changed the brakes to LX V-brakes, added bar ends, put on a suspension seatpost, had to replace the headset, trashed the pedals for Ritchie Clipless, and when the Grip Shift died, replaced the 7 speed for an 8 speed cog and added Deore shifters and rear derailers. The original seat was really bad, so that too has been replaced. Got a new chain whane I changed the cog. Anxiously await the next upgrade. However, considering the purchase price and what I've done, I've got an awfully good hardtail for under $1000 total. And since a lot of the upgrades really were due to things that wear out no matter how good they are, I've really got no qualms. If you can find one of these bikes used, I'd grab it in a heartbeat! | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Troy
a Weekend Warrior
from Nebraska
Date Reviewed: June 4, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | Keystone | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Strengths: | Real smooth ride, especially downhills. Gets going at a pretty decent clip. Durable frame that is pretty light (26 lbs). Head shock is great. | | Weaknesses: | Seat is very uncomfortable...that was the first thing I had to replace. Grip shifters tend to shift by themselves at times, this is an easy fix with a tune up, but it is still annoying | | Similar Products Used: | Some kind of Gary Fisher | | Bike Setup: | odometer, water bottle carrier, head/tail lights. Everything else is standard. | | Bottom Line: | I love the bike. Good on pavement or off road. Brakes can stop on a dime. An overall mint ride. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Patrick Kryzsko
a Weekend Warrior
from Overland
Date Reviewed: April 3, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | None yet | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Strengths: | Frame weight | | Weaknesses: | Nothing major yet, makes little cracking sounds when I turn the handlebars | | Similar Products Used: | Giant Sedon; Jamis Exile; Marin Bear Woods | | Bike Setup: | STX rear deraleur; XT front and rear brakes; grip shift | | Bottom Line: | So far I'm very pleased with this small frame Cad 2, F500. Bought it used last month and I'm not really sure of it's age. No problem, this bike has been great so far. For the $$ I spent on this bike, I couldn't have asked for more. If anyone knows what year Cannondale made a Cad 2, F500 w/killer V frame, please let me know. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
david
a Cross-Country Rider
from coquitlam, b.c.
Date Reviewed: August 8, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
alice lake | | Duration Product Used: |
more than 3 years | | Strengths: |
great frame, love the shock, replaceable dropout. | | Weaknesses: |
cheap components,crummy bottom bracket | | Bike Setup: |
upgraded headshock,new bottom bracket,new crankset,v-brakes,just put on esp9.0 sl | | Bottom Line: | my previous bike was stolen so I bought the f500 it was highly recommended to me.I blewout the bottom bracket in one month.Shimano recalled the crankset(alivio) so I bought a new one while waiting for the replacement.As I weight over 200lb.I decided to upgrade it. I love the bike and have put many miles on it. If I could change anything I wish I had the cad 2 or 3 frame but maybe next time. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
S. T.
a Cross-Country Rider
from Boston MA
Date Reviewed: July 29, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
2 Years | | Strengths: |
Light, fast, all around good | | Weaknesses: |
front derailleur (or BB, or crankset, CODA 200) Can't adjust it without it either jumping off the lower chainring or sticking in the middle ring, also I snapped the chain after 6 months of riding, wish it came with barends | | Similar Products Used: |
Gt tequesta with rock shox judy of somesort(was happy with that, but it got stolen) | | Bike Setup: |
STX-rc all around, except for crank, and I have no idea about the BB, and I added coda barends (to complete the look) | | Bottom Line: | Whoever said it looks good in viper red, damn straight. Wish I had some money so I could upgrade to at least Deore LX for 27 speeds, but the stx rc stuff works well. It would be nice if this model year came with clipless pedals also(I know the 99's do) All in all a sweet bike for the money. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Rick
a Weekend Warrior
from Cottswalds, England
Date Reviewed: April 28, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
less than 1 month | | Strengths: |
Light- weight frame
Handling | | Weaknesses: |
Poor gear components
Heavy seat post | | Similar Products Used: |
Rocky Mountain - Oxygen Race
Klien alttitude comp | | Bike Setup: |
Upgraded rear mech to XT deore. Replaced seat | | Bottom Line: | After purchasing the 98 Cannondale at a super discount price, I have to say I was pretty dissapointed with the gear components, the sach rear mech is the worst I have ever seen on any bike, there is so much flex in it its a wonder is manages to keep it in any gear for more than a few seconds.Needless to say this was soon replaced with the XT deore mech of my old GT and this has done the trick. The SACH Wavey shifters still seem pretty stiff, but I am hoping that they will loosen up after use.The handling and climbing abilities of this bike are excellent, definitly recommended (so long as you dont mind the odd upgrade) | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jay G
a Cross-Country Rider
from Adams Co, OH
Date Reviewed: April 5, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Snowshoe, WVa | | Duration Product Used: |
6 months | | Strengths: |
-Killer Frame
-Sweet shock: especially with upgrade
-Climbs like a Mt.goat | | Weaknesses: |
Stock componentry isn't top of the line, but what can you expect for the price. | | Similar Products Used: |
Trek carbon fiber and KHS chromoly | | Bike Setup: |
Upgraded to clipless peds,new bar and some ends, new saddle | | Bottom Line: | Kickin' ride: fast and maneuverable on the downhills and climbs like a goat. I'm tired of hearing all you wenies complaining about the components. If you know anything about riding, you should know you shred the components every year or so anyway, no matter where they stand on the line. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Don G
a Cross-Country Rider
from San Diego CA
Date Reviewed: March 23, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
1 Year | | Strengths: |
Frame, HeadShok | | Weaknesses: |
Stock Components, upgrade at least the derailleurs | | Similar Products Used: |
Specialized and GT hard tails, | | Bike Setup: |
After Upgrades:
Fatty D equiv Shock
XT Derailleurs
Double-wall Maverick wheels/oversized hubs | | Bottom Line: | Excelent bike. Stiff, indestructable.
Great intro bike, needs upgrades to make servicable for serious cross-country riding.
Upgrade derailleurs at purchase, recomend Fatty-D over any P-Bone headShok ($150 upgrade).Basically a $800 bike becomes $1000 after initial round of upgrades, for that reason consider a F700/900/1000 instead.Survived 3 serious crashes (at least the frame did ^_^).
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dave
a cross-country rider
from Knoxville
Date Reviewed: February 4, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
I feel like a moron for having purchased such a heap of image crap. Cannondale relies on their name and name alone...their procucts are only worth 2/3 what you pay ...if you are lucky. My bike: is heavier than others in its class (both style and price), weaker, has pathetic components and it is hard to service the stupid fu**!!! I only bought the stupid thing because I knew the name...well I'm a moron. I've ridden plenty of other bikes that cost the same...they ALL (that is inclusive) were better rides. They handled better, climbed better, looked better (as if I care), were easier to maintain and their shocks were all twice as nice. Oh well...I've been harsh enough...just look at any other brand besides cannonass. Try DBR, Jamis, Gary Fisher, Kona, KHS...anyone...just not Cannondale! I have a new bike now and do not plan to sell my cannondale...as I do not want to screw anyone else...I will just beat the pathetic thing with a hammer until it breaks...then go throw it in my back yard for my dogs to defecate on. I will give the hunk of crap two chilis...just because I can! | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Rocky Wotring
a cross-country rider
from Terra Alta WV
Date Reviewed: January 31, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
Excellent bike. Cannondale makes the best bikes but fnding a dealer that under-
stands head shok problems and can fix them seems to be impossible. As one other
reviewer put it mine also rattles I have had 2 different dealers work on my
shok and still have the rattle. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kate
a cross-country rider
from New Hampshire
Date Reviewed: January 21, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
I was shown hundreds of bikes before I saw this on and it was and still is the best bike.
I have had my f-500 for 3 years of hard daily training (50+ miles per week)
and tough racing and I can never ride any other bike again.
my only gripe was those vc-2 brakes. Ditch em get some V's.
Don't be afraid to do anything with this bike. It can handle even the nastiest of trails. When I bought the bike the shok at first was stiff. But once you ride it a little while and adjust the pre-load. You'll love the head-shok.
I have looked at other shok's (non headshoks) I just do not like the uneveness
on both sides. Get a Cannondale With a Headshok.
Nobody can ever separate me from my F-500. I love that bike! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
jimbob
a cross-country rider
from London, UK
Date Reviewed: January 3, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
Hmm... I've my F500 for a few months since I picked it up second-hand. It's a gorgeous frame, and the suspension's not bad... but those components...Basically, as stock, this is a fair-weather bike. One look at a patch of mud and it throws up its manicured American hands and grinds to a halt. Result? Three gears = no fun on a two-day long mudfest Polaris race.Upgrade time methinks. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Rich
a cross-country rider
from Texas
Date Reviewed: October 17, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
After almost 20 years of abstaining from riding a bike I chose a Cannondale (F500) based on the advice of a friend. I was initially surprised to see how much prices have increased, but the $750.00 I invested in my F500 was a wise choice. I recently discovered in the Wallstreet Journal (Marketplace Article on or about 14 Oct 98) Cannondale is the number 2 hottest selling bikes next only to Japans' Shimano. Guess what I got the best of both worlds...Coda parts on my F500 bars, seat, pedal, and shimano derailleurs. What a deal! The best part is this bike (as an amanteur seeking to regain my skills in riding again) is really solid thru rough terrain and stable at high speeds (I've already reached 30 MPH!) and stops on a dime. I'm sticking with a Cannondale. Five jalapenos for this kid. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ben Thompson
a cross-country rider
from Tulsa, OK
Date Reviewed: October 12, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I've been riding the F500 for about a year and have upgraded it a few times such as barends, clipless ped's, and V-Brakes, and think it is a great bike for anyone looking at getting into mountainbiking. It has a stiff frame and is a very confident bike. I also live on a budget and the price is the most important thing to consider. If you upgrade the components and keep just the frame then you should have a great X-country ride. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Corey Ayer
a weekend warrior
from Boston
Date Reviewed: August 24, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I just bought a new 1999 f500 and have no complaints. The frame is tight, and plenty stiff enough. True it's not the lightest, best equipped bike onthe market, but its not the most expensive either. I paid $750 and feel like I got a god deal. I couldn't be happier. I see this bike as an investment, since the frame is so nice, I can ride a good bike now and upgrade the components as they break and as I can aford to. Overall a great bike. Looks great in Viper red too. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Carlos M
a weekend warrior
from San Francisco
Date Reviewed: August 14, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I just bought this bike two weeks ago after a month of research looking for the appropriate bike into my budget. After looking through almost 30 or 40 different models and brands, I decided for a 1998 F-500. Why? Well, here are the main two reasons that made me decide for an F-500· Affordable price (I paid just 700 bucks) for an state of the art-superb designed frame
· Good components if you look at the price you are paying.Although I must recognize that the components are simply average (I am already having some trouble with the front derralieur), the improved handling that the combination of the Fatty P-Bone and the frame gives you is difficult to find in any bike within the price range of the F-500. This is a bike that I recommend to every weekend warrior. However, if you are looking for a more pro bike, maybe this is not the right choice for you. Components are not reliable enough to put this bike on the stress of a very technical driving. I am sure the Coda crank will fail, together with the chain, for just name a problem. Also, the shift-derralieurs combination work slow enough to put you under pressure (for not to say in danger) in any difficult drive. If you want a bike that could support well your pro-desire, I recommend you to buy the frame and build a tremendous bike around it, that for sure will be better and at about 75% of the price of some overpriced brands (Spec..)But, if you are a weekend warrior that wants to improve his/her skills to move onto more challenging rides, THIS IS THE BIKE FOR YOU! Run into your nearest Cannondale dealer and make this long-term investment. When you get ready for the hot roads, then start to change the components as the old ones fail.Overall, I give the F-500 4 Chilies for the average components. But the frame kick ass!
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dave S
a cross-country rider
from Melbourne OZ
Date Reviewed: August 10, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Well its been over 4 months since my last review and since then I have started racing this machine Cross Country - don't mess with this bike up hills kicks Ass that's an understatement. Now all I need to do is let go of the brakes on the downhills and there's no stopping me AGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!! with a few equipment upgrades over time including DD60 Oil Damping on the fly lockout head and Ritchey pedals its dam close to the F900 + Yea well probably costs as much now anyway!!! Viva Cannondale Still a high 5 | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ninja
a cross-country rider
from Ridgefield, CT
Date Reviewed: August 3, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I purchased the '98 model F500 back in March. Let me tell you, it is really a great bike. I demo'd a lot of other bikes and this one was the best in the price range HANDS DOWN. All of the cheap components on the '97 model were upgraded and the headshock rules. I probably will upgrade the shock next season so that I can lock it out on the fly. I have upgraded to a Shimano Clipless pedal (love it) and I am getting a Thudbuster this week (don't want to have to use Viagra before age 30.) But other than other misc. stuff (bar-ends, etc.) The stock F-500 is great. Take a look at the new '99 model! Even better components, new CAAD frame and the price is fantastic. Also for those of us who are patriotic... IT'S MADE IN THE USA. This is a great intermediate bike. you will love the stiff frame and the weight is unbeatable. Take a test ride if you can. Unless you are exclusively a down-hiller, you won't be disappointed. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dan Bryant
a weekend warrior
from Brussles, Belgium
Date Reviewed: July 30, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I undertook a lot of research before buying my new Cannondale F500, not least because, lets face it, they are expensive for a weekend warrior like me. That said it has been the most perfect tool for the 20 to 40 km dashes around the Belgian countryside. I am by no means a technical expert, however it has been clear to me that the bike is exceptionally well engineered and has an extrmely tough, capable feel. On the rare occasions that I have used it on the raod I have been very satisfied as I am able to adjust it perfectly to my preferences.I am shortly to take it to the English Lake District and will hopefully send a report on how I and it performed.Being a long term motorcyclist, I am pleased that Cannondale have started to make off road motorcycles also. Keep it up. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mike
a cross-country rider
from albany, ny
Date Reviewed: July 14, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought a '97 F500 last year to start riding off-road (I used to race sail boats before becoming land locked). This bike was a lot of fun to ride and I got hooked. I have upgraded most components to XT and XTR and have started racing. The bike is a great climber and the headshok can't be beat. I would recommend a c-dale to any level rider. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Brian
a cross-country rider
from AL
Date Reviewed: July 1, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Great frame, mediocre components, and a lot of fun to ride. Had the bike for a year now and no complaints. Once you start changing some of the components, the bike becomes much better. I would recommend going XT on the components, believe me, you will not regret it. Overall, great value at $700 and you can't beat the speed yellow color. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris
a weekend warrior
from Manchester, CT
Date Reviewed: June 27, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I just got into the sport a few months ago, and I must say when choosing a bike there are a lot of decisions to be made. The biggest issues I faced was wether to go with aluminum or chromolly, and to go with a great frame and lower componentry or with a decent frame and higher compentry. Anyhow, it's obvious what my final decisions were, because I bought the 1998 F-500. I got the frame great frame and can alway upgrade if the need be. I must tell you I made the right decision...I'm very happy with the bike. It handles extremely well and is pretty quick on the downhill. In addition, it's very light, which is nice to have in various decisions (initially I wasn't concerned with weight, but it is a factor). The thing I really like about aluminum is that it won't rust, which is also a really nice feature. The only thing I wish I had upgraded was the grip shift to rapid fire, only because when going uphill, sometimes I tend to shift accidentally seeing my hand is on the shifter, which is part of the grip. Eventually, I will also convert to clipless pedal, I continue to hear what a difference they make. I hope this review helped for anyone looking to make the big purchase. Feel free to e-mail me with any further questions or if you live in CT and are looking for people to ride with let me know. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Arkonbey
a
from cross-country rider
Date Reviewed: June 5, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Equipped with a rather loe-end HeadShok, the F500 is still a rahter nice bike. It takes a bit of fiddling with stem angles and lengths to get a good fit and the low-end components(stx drivetrain and Tektro linear pull brakes) add a bit of weight and make it a bit sluggish. It is, however, a GREAT starter bike or as a jump up from a real low-end beater first bike | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
David Sprague
a cross-country rider
from Melbourne Australia
Date Reviewed: June 1, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I was able to take advantage of a special offer where I traded in my old frame on the '98 Model year F500 frame in Viper Red. The deal included head shock and forks. I fitted the bike out with STX-RC deraillers, brakes, hubs, Rapid fire shifters, alloy colour seat post and Coda 900 saddle, alloy colour Coda long stem , Coda performance Bar and Bar Ends, IRC Mythos XC Kevlar Bead Tyres and Clip Pedals. Basically looks like the F1000 but with CAAD2 Frame and slightly lower end components with the STX - RC all around. Anyway looks meaner than the stock F500 and rides beautifully. Just saw the '99 range on the net and will stick with mine for sure!! 5 chillies | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
JamesX
a cross-country rider
from Syracuse, Utah
Date Reviewed: May 19, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought the F600 in March of 1996. I guess that was the last year to feature that frameset. I was planning on getting the Best of the East of the same year. It had a great paint job and nice high bb...but the F600 was only $150 more and it came with front suspension. I figured that it was more economical in the long run. The F600 is a CAAD2 with the DD50 HeadShok. I love the frame. I had to seriously upgrade the components and wheelset though. I now run a mix of LX, XT, ESP, and Coda components. The bike is very stiff. I like the stiffness of it...like driving a Porsche. You can really feel the terrain. This is a great racing bike and also a singletrack machine but most important it is FUN! I'm sure the F500 is quite identical to the F600 | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
jared menzel
a weekend warrior
from st paul, mn
Date Reviewed: May 17, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
i bought my f500 in split pea for 700 two weeks ago.
it was my second mountain bike, my first was a raleigh m40.
i have been really happy with the deal i got.
i have only crashed once, on a log bridge around a sharp corner,
but everything held together.
the only problem i have had is the set screws on the brakes kept shaking
into the screwed in position so the levers wouldn't go in all the way
once i removed them i have had nothing wrong
and i am happy with the shock, except for the noise it makes on hard hits
it's almost a hissing sound. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
carmen
a weekend warrior
from toronto,Canada
Date Reviewed: May 11, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
After many weeks of researching bikes,I narrowed my picks down to three which I consider all excellent products. They are the Specialized Rockhoper a1,the Trek 7000 and the Cannondale F500. I was somewhat concerned with C'dale's lack of
quality components in the 97 model year but they have upgraded these for 98 as well as direct pull brakes whcih were sadly missing prior to this. I did choose the f500 eventually and the reason was the superior frame that C'dale offers. In todays fickele economy,it is difficult to find a product that is still manufactured in North America to meet certain quality control specs. Sure there are better,lighter bikes with nicer components but but who has $2000 to spend on a bike. I'll no doubt upgrade some components as I go along but with a frame this good, I won't mind spending the money. Oh yes,I forgot to mention,the bike rides great! Stiff,and very precise steering... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
John
a weekend warrior
from monroe, ct
Date Reviewed: April 16, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought my '98 F500 a few weeks ago for $750. Overall the bike rides great but the Headshok-M rattled annoyingly when rebounding over bumpy trails. After some discussions with my local bike mechanic, I decided to upgrade the cartridge to a DD60 with oil damping and the on/off dial. The rattle is gone and I really like the on/off damping feature. If I had to do it again, I would have just bought the F700 from the start, since it comes stock with the DD60 cartridge, better rims, tires, and brakes. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Graham Re
a weekend warrior
from Fife, SCOTLAND
Date Reviewed: March 6, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I got my self a cannondale F500 in an attractive galaxy red colour in the end of year sales a couple of months ago. !!!TOP DOG!!!I am not the most experienced of mtber (my previous and only mtb having been a raleigh amazon) but i imediatley realised what a great bike this was.
The fork (MC60) although initialy a bit stiff has realy improved with a few hours use and i now realy notice the difference on my rides. Handling is much improved over my last bike and riding up hills almost seems easy compared with days of old.
I enjoy riding this bike so much that I've even been known to when its cold and dreich (admitably, not many other options in scotland).
Having read some of the other reveiws posted on this page i noticed a few people moaning about the quality of the componants. Surly it makes sense to spend your money getting a great frame and fork with lower end spec than spending all your money on XTR (which will need replacing after a couple of scottish winters anyway) and fitting it to the cheapest, crudiest frame you can find. Its the frame and fork that defines the characteristics of a bike anyway.
I also noticed that someone was moaning about the fact that we get LX parts in europe. We only gat a LX mech (8 speeds pretty good though). On the downside though we have to pay just a wee bit more for this luxury(£875=$1400(+-)). You americans dont know youve been born!In summary then this is a great bike with a top dog frame and a fork to match. True some of the componentry may have been downgraded to accomadate the frame and fork but this doesnt affect my enjoyment. The bike still goes well and handles (thanks to the frame and fork) well too.
Hell, even my sister likes this bike so it must be good. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jason
a weekend warrior
from Minneapolis MN
Date Reviewed: March 1, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I just picked up a yellow `97 F500 for $599. Been out a couple times in the snow and so far its great! Sure some of the components may need to be swapped by summertime, but hey, the frame and headshock make it a bargain. I had an M500 for about 6 years until last year, and no complaints with that one either. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Eric Pfeiffer
a weekend warrior
from New Jersey
Date Reviewed: February 25, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I baught a leftover 97 F-500 in January for $699, I added barends and a gel seat This bike rides great, the headshock is kickin, components are low-end but work ok and can be upgraded easily, coda 200 cranks seem very reliable and sturdy, frame is well constructed and light. I love it!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Roberto
a weekend warrior
from Mexico City, Mexico
Date Reviewed: January 23, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
This is a great chance to speak out for all of us mountain bikers in Mexico. We are starting to get all the good foreign brands of bikes down here... and i must say that I'm really glad to have Cannondale dealers around. I had a Specialized Hard Rock with shitty components before upgrading to the beautiful '98 F500 in viper red. I just can´t compare between those two bikes. The 'Dale isn´t just gorgeous, but handles incredibly better, and is so much lighter. For that price (around 800 dollars, here in Mexico City) you won't find a better buy. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Spike
a weekend warrior
from Seattle,Wa USA
Date Reviewed: January 13, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Had this big over 2 years. Rode originally for cross, but have beefed it up as a DS machine. Rise bars, rhynolite rims, avids vees, flat pedals etc. This bike screams on BMX trails in my area. Forgiving in the air, and plush on landings. Sometimes harsh on steep technical downhills, but super fast. My only complaint would be higher BB clearence, Like the Beast of the east killer V but I guess its higher due to trials. Also would recommend spending for the fork upgrade later on, but the bike is 100% cannondale | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dave
a weekend warrior
from Monterey, CA
Date Reviewed: January 12, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have now had my Cannondale F500 for about 10 months. My biggest complaint is the lack of quality parts. I am in the process of replacing the rear / front derailleurs, shifters and handle bar. I am happy with the crank set and I love the frame and shock system. I feel that one shock below the head is more evenly responsive than the standard side by side shock system found on most all bikes. All in all I really enjoy my bike. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Anoymous
a racer
from USA
Date Reviewed: December 26, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
It's a cool all around bike. Wait until the fork is really broken in before you make any judgements though. The more you ride it the plusher it becomes. The rest is a-okay. The brakes are fine once you have them dialed in but and upgrade here wouldn't hurt. Add bar-ends and it gets even better. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dave White
a cross-country rider
from Mountain View, CA
Date Reviewed: December 8, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I got my F500 this April and rode it hard through the summer. I quickly thrashed both rims and found myself sliding all around on the tires. I upgraded to some tough wheelsmith rims and some specialized team master/control tires. Also upgraded the rear cassette to 34 teeth for some serious Granny gearing. Since then the bike has been totally low maintenance and a very solid ride. Don't tell the park rangers but I hit 42 mph at Skeggs point on the Fir trail without losing control. The headshok seems to allow nice turning control even on big bumps and high speed. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Curtis Durham
a weekend warrior
from Atlanta, Ga
Date Reviewed: December 7, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I got a pea-green '98 F-500 just about 2 months ago.
This is my first mountain bike, so I'm no pro, but for a first timer I think this is a good buy. I consulted with friends as what to get. They all suggested something that came with a good frame and decent components. Most of the complaints about the F-500 seem to be about the '97 components, but it appears the the '98 has much better ones.
I payed $799 for mine.
shimano v-brakes
shimano stx-rc deraileurs and hubs
8 gear cassette
coda cranks, handlebar, seat
sun rims
irc mythos tires.
I'm a pretty big guy, about 215 pounds and I've crashed quite a few times already. The only serious damage I've done was to the cat-eye reflector in the front when I hit a tree head on. The reflector shattered, but nothing happened to the bike.
So far, I've replaced the toe clip pedals with shimano 636 clipless, added some bar ends and I bought some continental town and countries for commuting.Oh! The guy where I bought the bike warratied out the headshock unit for the better one that uses oil for dampening and can be turned on or off for free. Maybe if you are considering this bike, you can get the same deal.I love the way this bike rides. I haven't ridden many others on single track, but I can say this one seems to ride real nice.5 chilies for the F-500
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
mark
a cross-country rider
from md
Date Reviewed: November 2, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
F500:
Ok, here's the truth (in my opinion). I bought an f500 97 leftover in yellow.
it is a nice bike, but as many have said, the components were low-end. I road
hard for a while, then replaced the front & rear der. with xtr's. also replaced
the saddle, and put in the dd60 damping. barends are coming soon. with the new
components, the bike is AWESOME. I beat the heck out of it up and down hills,
and so far the beast is still un-shattered. I'm big, over 200lbs, and i've fallen with the bike hard also...no cracks. as far as the low end xt derr.,
i found that it shifts ok, but the xtr is a nice upgrade. if you can find a
leftover 97' (yellow), then upgrade it, you'll be happy! sorry, but mtn.
biking isn't cheap if you want good stuff... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Tone
a racer
from
Date Reviewed: October 21, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought a F500 2 months ago. I like the stiffness that a Dale had to offer. However, my bike came with LX front,rear derail., XT Rapidfire shifters and levers,clipless. THe components that came with the bike are junk, but if you can haggle with the bike shop to put it in for you for a good price then you got a deal. Its light , responsive and fun to ride. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
joe biker
a weekend warrior
from sacramento,CA
Date Reviewed: October 16, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I have a C'dale f600 from 1995. I have replaced the oil cartridge and the shock itself. I have had no problems getting warranty parts at no charge even from shops that I did not originaly purchase the bike from. After seeing all the other fork co.s products I settled on the C'dale because it is just the best one. Accept Marzocci perhaps (but they have been building shocks the right way for 50 years but people just figured out that maybe a little weight is better.
I love my C'dale and will not part with it.
For those of you who have a gripe about the low end components quit your whinning. I guess you could pay the same price for another bike with a semi nice frame and then a year down the road you can cough up $500 for a frame because you broke yours in a race. C'dale is offering hand build alumium frames that are top quality. If you can't stand the heat go buy a GT or a Special-ed bike like every one else. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jaster
a downhiller
from Staten Island, NY
Date Reviewed: October 16, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
i cant believe that i havent written a great review yet on this great bike. people who are interested in the f500: this bike is the absolutly best buy out there. just like Joe Biker below me says, the frame is great, and whats the point of getting a bike with everything on it anyway? though they may not be expensive, aftermarket components, they still are perfect, and you can upgrade them. i recently just got a set of Club Roost GO FAST bars, they look sweet. you cant forget about that headshock though. I think thats its one if the best shocks out there, and if it was a seperate company and wasnt owned by Cannondale, then it would be as big (bigger) than Rockshox. Building up the bike is half the fun, you can customize it with the components that you want! (i love the reversible stems too)
is your thinking about this bike, then your reading this, and i say, you will not be dissappointed, accept when i pass you.
PEACE
-Jaster | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mark Owens
a cross-country rider
from Ohio
Date Reviewed: September 28, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I went to 12 bike shops looking for a new bike (my trusty Raleigh Impulse couldn't handle a suspension fork), and test rode several bikes before settling on the Cannondale F500 (mine's a close-out '97 painted Speed Yellow).I know a few people have slammed the bike, saying it's got bottom-feeder parts. I'd have to agree. I'm not thrilled with the Shimano Altus or Acera-X components, and only marginally satisfied with the STX-RC rear derailleur. Cannondale's own CODA parts are passable, but I've used better.On the other hand, I can't understand this component fixation people seem to have. Most of the parts get trashed or worn out in a year or two. What you don't replace through use, you tend to swap out 'cause you're tired of looking at it.No, I bought the F500 because of the frame and the Headshok (yeah, the MC60 isnt' a Fatty 70, but I had a budget I promised to stick to). It's stiff in the right places, responsive and fits my riding style perfectly.As far as the company's reputation for not supporting its products, I've heard plenty of first-hand accounts about Cannondale going out of its way to keep owners happy.
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Scott
a weekend warrior
from Charleston, SC
Date Reviewed: August 15, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought this bike a little over 2 months ago and although I wanted to enter
a review after the first week, I decided to wait until I'd really ridden it
some. Being my first MTB I really have no reference, but I have to say I LOVE
THIS BIKE. It seems to conform to the way I want to ride, and being 6'3 I'll
bet not every bike could do that. Now If I could just get used to these new
clipless pedals...Later | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Phaedrus
a weekend warrior
from Dayton, Ohio
Date Reviewed: August 3, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I deliberated a long time before purchasing my F500, but after a month of riding, I am without reegrets. I am a late twenty-something small framed
female student that needs a good bike for weekday transportation and weekend hard off road frustration releasing riding. C'dale makes beautiful frames,
and since I couldn't afford the bike I really wanted (C'dale F2000), I
hesitated taking a step down for the bike I could afford. The Components
on the F500 are strictly ornamental...they aren't made for hard riding...therefore, I worked out a deal where I upgraded them to the F700
level components, threw a DD60 headshock on her, a few little extras...and
she is a beauty!...Very lite, strong, and elegant (not to mentiona a little flashy being galaxy red frame color)!
For the initiate or the financially challenged, this is a fantastic bike...you won't be disappointed with the quality of the frame (I can't speak for the components) At present, C'dale is a great company for their customers...should you decider to upgrade the frame in the future, they are
very fair with trade-ins (i believe @60-70% of original price), and most important, they stand behind their product with a lifetime warranty...it is reassuring to know that someone is willing to be accountable for their work, especially when you are paying so much for the dependibility.
Finally, a C'dale just won the tour de france - suggesting that the noteworthy riders acknowledge the quality of the bike/company product.
Good luck in your decision process...there really is no ABSOLUTE perfect bike - you just need to determine your priorities and find the 'best fit'.----------------------it's all relative (E=mc2)-------------------------------- | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
thirtysomething
a weekend warrior
from San Jose, CA, USA
Date Reviewed: July 29, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
First of all, is this a KILLER web site, or what??!!I was in the market for my first mtn. bike, and I decided to get a mid-level aluminum hardtail. Besides the C'Dale F500, I looked at:GT Ricochet: Nice bike overall. Cool frame, plus V-brakes. However, it's made overseas, probably in some 3rd world country where they exploit their workforce!Klein Pulse Comp: Pretty nice bike, but stiff as hell. My butt hurt after riding just 10 minutes! Also, NO rear derailleur hanger??!! What's up with that, Klein? Also, what's up with just a 5-year warranty? Why not lifetime like C'Dale (CAAD2 frames) or Trek?Then, I went to a local bike shop that carries Cannondale, and that's when I saw the difference between C'Dale and all the other wanna-be's. It's all about ATTENTION TO DETAIL. Just the design of the Headshok alone will make you want to switch: Rock Shox uses wimpy ball bearings, while C'Dale uses beefy ones. Which kind do you want on YOUR bike while screaming down a narrow, winding singletrack??!!Regarding my new '97 F500:Pluses:
1) The frame design is cool. Since I'm vertically challenged, I had to get the small frame, which is great, because the small frame uses the cool-looking Killer V design. Finally -- score one for short people!
2) The paint job (Speed Yellow). You're guaranteed to turn heads!
3) The Headshok monoshock (see previous comment on the ball bearings).
4) Hand-made and crafted in the good ol' U S of A.
5) The lifetime warranty on the frame.
6) It's a Cannondale. Best bike company around, in my opinion. Although, Specialized might be a close second.Okay, now the minuses:
1) No V-brakes (even on their F700)!! This will be the first thing I'm going to upgrade. I'm glad to hear the '98 's have them now.
2) STX rear and Alivio front. They should both AT LEAST be STX-RC's at this price range ($700+). Was componentry an afterthought??!!
3) The 7-speed drivetrain. Why not 8, Cannondale?
4) The sucky GripShit, I mean GripShift. But it's not C'Dales fault, it's SRAM's, right?All in all, I'm very happy with my F500. I've had it for a month. It's a work of art, and my bike gets SO many compliments from friends and strangers alike (I think it's a combination of the frame design and color).Gotta give it 5 chilies, just because there's so much UNWARRANTED Cannondale-bashing going on!
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
John Leo
a weekend warrior
from New York, NY USA
Date Reviewed: July 23, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Before I give my review, let me start off by saying that I have no experience whatsoever
with mtb's. The only bikes I ever had were a BMX and a 12 speed road bike the size
of a kiddie bike. I got a Cannondale F500i in July and I have to say I love it. I told the store
to upgrade to LX-V brakes for $65 and they work great (pads suck like shit tho and wear out in 1 week)
The bike looks great and have drawn more second glances than a Ferrari. More than I can say for myself.I have no intention of upgrading the bike. My next bike (probably 5 years from now - getting a real job out of college soon) will be a full suspension Cannondale. A few complaints I had (I think they're my bike specifically) are that the weld marks aren't done as well as other cannondales I've seen. Also, the specs on C'dale's web page doesn't exatly match the real deal. LBS I bought it from was a real asshole filled place so it kind of took away from the overall experience of bike buying. All in all, the bike looks durabel and has a lifetime warranty. I love Cannondales. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Charlie Wilson
a weekend warrior
from West Virginia
Date Reviewed: July 16, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Just bought the new 98 a few days ago... So far I have not found a thing that I can complain about... The components are alright.. The upgrade on the 98 to the Vbrakes are niceWould recommend this bike. . | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
carol
a weekend warrior
from NH
Date Reviewed: July 1, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought a '95 left-over F500 as an upgrade from a '90 KHS Montana Sport. I had the gripshift changed out to rapidfire before it left the store. Aside from being a great fit (the small frame really is small!) and much lighter than I was used to, I've really enjoyed the smooth shifting and comfortable ride (mostly trails and dirt roads). I'm a beginner and not too knowledgable about the relative value/worth of the components, but I wanted a bike I could upgrade instead of replace. The guy at the local bike shop pointed out where he thought the bike was weak, but given that I paid $599 for it, I think I got my money's worth. It also tows a trailer-bike easily...Bottom line, it rides well, shifts smoothly, stops, and is easy to get on and off the truck. Who cares if there are better bikes--this one suits me. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
TIT
a weekend warrior
from New Martinsville,WV
Date Reviewed: June 28, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
very good but my wife wants a better bike now!!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jason
a weekend warrior
from Albuquerque, NM
Date Reviewed: May 30, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I come here to read about how people feel about bicycling products, and assuming we all have a common interest and bond in the sport I am writing this. It upsets me to read the comments by Eric P. You obviously do not like Cannondale bikes, but it was totally unappropriate to put down a fellow rider.Enough said! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris
a cross-country rider
from Lee,NH
Date Reviewed: May 27, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Well, I was going to buy this bike but then I realized how much I was going to pay for the stupid frame. The componetrey was sucky so was the rest of the bike.Instead I bought a Klein Pulse Pro and am more than happy. And the Klein only cost 150 more. | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Rudester
a weekend warrior
from Colorad
Date Reviewed: May 20, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
after several years of procrastinating, i finally purchased this bike. Having had little mtb experience i purchased it mostly at the recommendation of a buddy who said, a caad 2 mtb cannondale frame and you can't go wrong. I knew that the components weren't caviar quality, but I decided to go w/ this bike because I knew that I would enjoy all of the upgrades later, even if I did turn out to spend more money (and DO prepare and plan to upgrade!)
I would recommend going this way rather than shelling out 1400 dollars up front for a souped up bike. There is no fun in buying a bike that somebody else put together for you. i.e. Gee, this bike is cool, too bad that I don't know how my rear derailleur works. . .
So far I have spent upwards of $600 in upgrades but prefer to do it this way. but my buddy was right, . . . don't worry about the components, get the frame you want and build it later.
Get it, build it, RIDE IT! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Crom Cruz
a weekend warrior
from Ca
Date Reviewed: May 14, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Buy one now! Great bike, handles well, keeps you from falling on your
ass when flying downhill. Straight frame but other components especially
brakes need to be upgraded. FOR THE MONEY, hey, ride it hard and change
as you go and learn: what upgrades mean and how much your willing to
spend for the slight changes. No money for V-brakes, changeing pads may
help (under 10 bucks). Improvise, it's a great bike. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jonathan
a
from Lehigh Valley, PA
Date Reviewed: May 2, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Bought the bike last year and am now upgrading. I replaced the MC with the Fatty and have installed XT V-brakes. Next will be the cranks and BB with the drivetrain shortly thereafter.
When you buy this bike you're getting a great frame and fork, plan on upgrading everything else!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
MIKE CHAIN
a cross-country rider
from HOLLYWOOD, CA
Date Reviewed: April 13, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
BOUGHT IT, LOVED IT, CAME INTO SOME MORE DOUGH, UPGRADED EVERYTHING EXCEPT THE HANDLEBARS. ...WHAT A BIKE!!! XT REAR, LX FRONT, UN91, DD60, XT WHEELSET,LX BRAKES(will upgrade those later),DIACOMPE PC11 BRAKE LEVERS, GRIPSHIFT 600, THUDBUSTER SEATPOST, ETC. MAIL ORDERS AND BLOW OUT DEALS KEPT THE UPGRADES REASONABLE. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Rich Strapple
a racer
from Glenside
Date Reviewed: February 16, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Very happy with handling of this frame. the components are lacking but for a budget rider great frame for money and components can be upgrade as you bust em... rides lighter then 26lbs... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Derrick White
a weekend warrior
from Hawick, Scotland
Date Reviewed: February 5, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Bought this f500 97 rapidfire plus in December and use it mostly at the weekend, this is my third mountian bike in 5 years and was very inpressed with the handleing and downhill response from the mc60 headshock unit. Initially the elastomers were stiff but now seem to be 'worn in' and travel more freely. As for the rest of the bike the coda chainset and shimano Lx components are decent. I have decided to upgrade the Alivio brakes to V-brakes as the original ones were pish. This bike cost me £899.00 (pounds) and well worth it in my eyes.
Does anyone know if I can upgrade the mc60 headshock to a top adjust job. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bo Offenhauer
a racer
from Bradenton, FL U.S.A
Date Reviewed: June 18, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
Great all-around bike I had one once loved it to death. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
RyBones
a weekend warrior
from New York
Date Reviewed: June 14, 1996 | | Bottom Line: |
Before I begin I should say that I can beat the hell out of anything and
can be rather anal with exacting standards, things should be done right.
I like the frame and Headshock on this cannondale and I am very impressed
with how agile it performs in tight places. But I will point out that
this only applies to the frame. The Headshock is definatly better than
any thing less than the top of the line Judy, although it lacks travel but
C'dale is giving 10 cm more next year. Alright I bought a frame and shock,
as for the rest of the bike either C'dale is joking or it should have a
warning sticker on it that reads This bike is for first time buyers,
whimps or posers, that have no intention of riding hard of fast.
Well
I had a not from my mother and I bought this on the premise that at $750 it
would be a good bike for me, NOT! My first problem was that I easily over
powered my drivetrain. At 6'2 175 I hold my own but I'm not Arnold, this
should not be a problem. But it was, not only was it poorly matched
compomentry but it was poorly made. C'dale also had two other models that
are rigged the same way so it is not an isolated problem or an oversight.
As a matter of fact a friend bought an M400 a week later and had the same
problems. Fortunaly my guy at the shop was able to square it away but not
untill the C'dale guy basicaly admitted that he was stupid and useless but
said try changing the cassette, AH! so they are aware of the problem. That,
a Bassworm, and a different chain later the problem was solved. Before I
bash it anymore I will point out some good things.
First and foremost, if
you want a bike now but can't yet afford the one you want, the F500 can be
built into a monster. This bike reaks of potential but untill it is built
it is definatly amature night. The Alivio brakes work quite well and
although I'm going to V-brakes, you won't go wrong with the Alivios.
STX rear deraliur was ok at first but now I over power it and often have
slow results due to the combonation of it and the GripShift 400's, somethings
not quite right there. Alvio front dr. works fine but again awaits an up
grade. Alivio cranks look pretty darn good but the rest of my description
for those can only be assymilated to the sound of bending a tin can back
and forth, TRASH THEM! And don't let the garbage man see them because he will
laugh at you also! Bottom bracket? Paper wieght, maybe, NOT! TRASH IT! The
bikes two main down falls are two of the most important things, BB and
cranks.
Oh Yeh, it comes with toe clips but when you go to clipless spend
the coin for the Shimano 747's, absolutaly the best! Well there is the bike
in a nut shell. I have gone with XT cranks and a UN 71 BB. Next I do a XT
rear dr. and the Headshock upgrade and I'll have one hell of a bike. What
would I recomend? Buy the C'dale frame you like and build it or run with this
one and build it as you go. It will end up costing you about the same as
the F700 but in the end you will have a better bike with the exact components
you want and know from experience. I rate the frame four and a half chilli
peppers. (This is for anyone that had any thing to do with the OEM cranks on
my bike: I understand the idea of you get wat you pay for and I paid for a
pair of cranks.
What I got was tinfoil place holders where cranks should be
. I paid for cranks that work right and those definatly do not. The
definition of work right does not mean, for a person of a certain hight,
weight or experience level. Those are just excuses for ripping some one off and
then charging them more for the one that does work. You should be ashamed of
yourself for marketing such a product and Shimono knows better so they should be
embarassed also. I still want the cranks I paid for, so where are they?) | | Overall Rating: |
| |
|
Photo Caption Contest
(sponsored by Maxxis)
|
Enter here
|
|
|
$ 976.00
