Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 7 (7 Reviews Total)
| |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
mtb4life05
a Cross Country RiderDate Reviewed: April 29, 2013
Strengths: Very light weight,liner is very light and breaths well
Weaknesses: noneBottom Line: I'm 6'3" 230 Clyde. and these are by far the best fitting shorts for me.
Very light weight and I don't feel like I'm over heating down there.
The short material stretches very well seeing how I have larger thighs than most.
The liner fits like a glove and breaths well.
My go to shorts for hot days.
Duration Product Used: 2 years
Price Paid:
$50.00
Purchased At: web
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
SilentG
a All Mountain RiderDate Reviewed: July 18, 2012
Strengths: Comfortable, fit well, forget that they are there, don't get caught on saddleWeaknesses: Having only one pocket is a bit weird, not a deal breakerBottom Line: In the beginning I started out with some Pearl Izumi running shorts and used a PI chamois with them.
I then tried Hoss Ponderosa which worked OK but the belt in them broke while trying to tighten and keep them up. Then came the Hoss Stallion which I only used a couple of times due to shoddy worksmanship (insert broke on the loop system).
About 6 months ago I figured that I should just go with a Pearl Izumi short and the Canyon is their most popular mtb short (according to their marketing).
I wanted something with a detachable liner (adios Ponderosa), quality workmanship (sayanora Hoss), etc and my Pearl Izumi liner and even running shorts that I used before never let me down across rides, crashes, etc.
The Canyon is the only short I wear now. Extra chamois can be had at places like Pricepoint and I don't have to monkey around with pulling up my shorts, worrying about my shorts getting hung up on my saddle, crap breaking on the shorts, etc.
I just ride and my shorts have held up like new after a washing 1-2 times a week and use 3-4 times a week.
I wish I had just bitten the bullet up front and went with the Canyon as trying to save some $$$ on Hoss gear ended up costing me more than the Canyon and included chamois would have cost me.
Fitment is snug at the waist but true to size if you look at a sizing chart.Shorts/chamois do not get too warm here in Arizona where I ride in 80 to 90 degree weather.
Duration Product Used: 5 months
Price Paid:
$48.00
Purchased At: Amazon.com
Similar Products Used: Hoss Ponderosa, Hoss Stallion
Bike Setup: Kona Dawg
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
ozzybmx
a Cross Country Rider
from AustraliaDate Reviewed: March 6, 2012
Strengths: Lightweight, stretchy and well made, you get a decent pair of chamois liners as a bonus. Tighter fitting than most others.Bottom Line: Im just searching for a pair in a different colour and this review came up in the search, so im buying pair #2. These are now my favourite shorts.
I usually wear Large, i have went a Medium in these after reading reviews and would advise you to get 1 size down too.
Favorite Trail: unshared
Duration Product Used: 3 months
Price Paid:
$55.00
Purchased At: eBay
Similar Products Used: Many others.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Aslan
a Cross Country Rider
from Chico, CaDate Reviewed: January 27, 2012
Strengths: The LinerWeaknesses: Too longBottom Line: The 2010 version of the shorts are so great. Still my go to pair of baggies. They were the right length, had this great quiet stretch fabric, the liner is top notch - even when compared to Lycra shorts. The snap closure could have been a bit better, still good though. Anyway, since they were all that, I bought a new pair. Change is not good in this case. Way to long so they hit below the knee. New fabric that is shinny and sticks to the saddle a bit. The liner is still good so I will be wearing it with my old pair. Of course I cannot find the old style anywhere. Bummer.
Favorite Trail: The one I am riding
Duration Product Used: 1 Year
Price Paid:
$70.00
Purchased At: online
Similar Products Used: The previous seasons version
Bike Setup: Moots Cinco, king, XO, ect...
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Steve
a Cross Country Rider
from Pocatello, Idaho, USADate Reviewed: July 10, 2006
Strengths: Great fit, excellent chamois for the price, topnotch workmanship/finishingWeaknesses: No front/side pockets, but then again, those would add weight/materialBottom Line: Great shorts--hands down the best-fitting baggy I've yet tried (see list above) and one of the very best in terms of quality of construction. Of the many pairs of mtb baggies I own, the PI Canyons are the first ones I look for when I'm going on both short and long rides. I particularly appreciate their simplicity and superlightweight, coupled with sound construction of much more durable materials than all other "lightweight" baggy shorts I've tried. I don't much care for pockets when I'm on the bike, though I do occasionally miss having some place to put my hands when I'm off the bike. These shorts are definitely right in there with the typical high quality of design and construction I've always experienced with Pearl Izumi products.
Favorite Trail: Flume Trail at Lake Tahoe
Duration Product Used: 6 months
Price Paid:
$45.00
Purchased At: eBay
Similar Products Used: Primal Wear/Nema/Fox/Borah/Nike baggy mtb shorts
Bike Setup: 98 Specialized S-Works M2 w/Manitou Minute 2.00 fork and a bunch of lightweight stuff.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Fang Grebelski
a Cross Country Rider
from southern, CADate Reviewed: November 11, 2004
Strengths: NoneWeaknesses: Piece of crapBottom Line: Read for yourself. I remember when PI stood behind their product at all cost. I honestly am not a complainer, but these shorts cost me $70 - and they ARE UNUSABLE! They suck. Here's the response from Pearli Izumi:
Kevin,
We do not offer an exchange program for gear that has been worn. You may want to try your dealer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Fang
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 10:20 PM
To: Info
Subject: Request
I am a long-time loyal Pearl Izumi owner. I buy shorts, shirts and gloves.
I know that when I buy a new Pearl Izumi garment, I'll be happy. As a Mountain Bike rider, I've especially always appreciated the fit of PI tights... but recently decided to try a pair of baggies.
I purchased the Canyon Bike Short (Model #0115), and can honestly say I've never worn a more uncomfortable pair of shorts on a ride. In the bike shop, the large was too tight, but the XL felt good. But on the ride, on every climb, these shorts were dropping very low... I will not ride in them again. They really need a draw string or something to allow a better fit.
Do you have any exchange program in place?
Thanks
Favorite Trail: Chileo
Duration Product Used: Tested or demo'ed only
Price Paid:
$70.00
Purchased At: Cycle Werks
Similar Products Used: I normally wear Pearl Izumi tights.. love 'em.
Thought I'd try some baggies.
Bike Setup: '01 Fuel 90 with an '04 Fox Vanilla fork. Great setup.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Chris
from Denver, CO, USADate Reviewed: September 13, 2004
Strengths: Durable PI quality, look nice, comfortable.Weaknesses: Too darn long! These hit me below the knee and got in the way while pedaling.Bottom Line: These would be excellent shorts if I was about 6" taller. They hit me in just the wrong place and - I understand from some folks at the Pearl Izumi store - I'm not alone in that feeling. The long length made pedaling uncomfortable and got in the way numerous times. I finally ended up selling them to a tall friend after wearing them twice. Otherwise the liner was comfortable and the overall quality was good. If Pearl makes some shorter shorts, they'll have a great product. Here's hoping for the 2005 model...
Duration Product Used: 6 months
Price Paid:
$60.00
Purchased At: LBS
Similar Products Used: Performance board shorts with separate liner.
Bike Setup: 2004 Kona Hoss
|
Reviews 1 - 7 (7 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |