Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 3 (3 Reviews Total)
| |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Andrew
a Cross Country Rider
from Barrie, ont, CanadaDate Reviewed: May 10, 2000
Strengths: city friendly (baggy)
Durable
Good lookin
Feel goodWeaknesses: hard ti washBottom Line: wowee ye haw these will never rip
i give em 5 flamin ded bodies
Favorite Trail: Hardwood hills, tight and twisty
Duration Product Used: 3 months
Similar Products Used: none (these are the best)
Bike Setup: Trek 8500 with sid on front
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
a Cross Country Rider
from blue bell, paDate Reviewed: April 13, 2000
Strengths: Cool looking, good outer shellWeaknesses: liner sucks, the pad kept moving around
Fox cargo short lots betterBottom Line: These shorts suck big time. I don't know if they made
changed for 2000, but in 99 model I returned them. I then
got the cargo short which was excellent. I don't think they
make the cargo for 2000. I also bought the nema jewel which were great. Fox is still a good company
Duration Product Used: Less than 1 month
Similar Products Used: canondale, Fox cargo, nema
Bike Setup: specialize
Overall Rating:
Submitted by
RONNIE GUTIERREZ
a Weekend Warrior
from SAN BERNARDINO, CA.Date Reviewed: December 10, 1999
Strengths:
VERY RELIABLE AND THEY LOOK PRETTY COOL.Weaknesses:
THE INNER NYLON LYCRA LINER.(IT'S LYCRA)Bottom Line: THESE SHORTS SEEM TO BE DURABLE AND I LIKE THE BAGGY STYLE.
Favorite Trail:
ALL TRAILS
Duration Product Used:
6 months
Similar Products Used:
BOARD SHORTS
Bike Setup:
LABEL IN THE BACK DRAWSTRING IN THE FRONT.
|
Reviews 1 - 3 (3 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
