|
|
|
| |
Submitted by
Marc
a Cross Country Rider
from Manitoba
Date Reviewed: October 10, 2006 | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$100.00 | | Purchased At: | Independent Optician | | Strengths: | Once the optician showed me how to remove the lenses, it was a breeze. I find my lenses easy to remove and install. I haven't had any problems to date. Not quite sure about the negative reviews dealing with lenses popping out.???? RX insert is really nice. | | Weaknesses: | None to date | | Similar Products Used: | Sun Pro | | Bottom Line: | Well worth the money for me. I may have problems in the future but for now, no complaints. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Tom
a Weekend Warrior
from Los Angeles, CA, USA
Date Reviewed: July 13, 2006 | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$60.00 | | Purchased At: | www.opticsplannet.com | | Strengths: | Interchangeable lenses. Cheap. I personally think they look cool. | | Weaknesses: | Damn thing is falling apart after 1 use. | | Similar Products Used: | None | | Bottom Line: | I bought these things because I wanted the option of usiing clear lenses for nightime riding and they were cheap. I couldnt be unhappier with this product. The rubber nosepieces and sides are glued on with what appears to be super glue. The assembly seems to have been done rather sloppily because you can see some of the glue running out of the cracks between the frame and rubber. The sides have already fallen off and I expect the nose pads to do the same after a little more use. Also, the lenses come off way to easy after only a few removals. I am going to use them until they are completely trash (I dont expect that to be very long) and I will invest in something better. I will never buy another bolle product again. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
John Doe
a Cross Country Rider
from Australia Mate!!!!!!!!
Date Reviewed: February 11, 2004 | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Purchased At: | Rowe and Jarman | | Strengths: | Let see now.
They give good vision with cool lense colours, thats about it. | | Weaknesses: | Let me count the ways!!
The nose and ear grips come off too easily, so easily its like they were designed to come off or something.
And when you twist your head to look behind, the glasses lift off your face, didn't even think that was possible.
That should be enough to discourage you from buying these sunnies. | | Similar Products Used: | Rudy Project Kerosene. These rock, except the copper on the nose pads is starting to show under the metallic finish. | | Bottom Line: | Bad bad bad glasses.
Go buy rudy project, but if ain't got the dought, check out the D'arcs, they are well packin it. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
FishMan
a Cross Country Rider
from Flagstaff
Date Reviewed: November 30, 2003 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Purchased At: | 55-130 | | Strengths: | rubber nose and ear pieces grip well, inexpensive, fairly durable | | Weaknesses: | nose and ear pads fall off, cheeply constructed, poorly engineered, look dorky | | Similar Products Used: | just cheep stuff | | Bike Setup: | not an issue here | | Bottom Line: | These classes confirm my belief that all expensive eye wear is a rip-off. I bought my first pair of these four years ago when I was in college and broke. My vision finally got bad enough that I needed prescription lenses for riding, these were the cheapest option for sunglasses, so I bought them. I just today begrudgingly bought my third pair.
I like the fact that the nose and ear pads stick pretty well even if I’m sweaty and even over top of a fairly slick ear band. And the prescription insert thing works pretty well, I’ve never had a problem with it. And they are pretty durable, I ran them over with a fully loaded touring bike (about 240lbs of bike and rider, but at only about 3 mph) which scratched both the lenses and the frame, but no permanent damage. But....
They’re not really well designed and constructed. The nose pads just keep falling off. I would think it would be easy to design these so that the rubber par was just a sheath over a more solid structure, but they’re just tacked onto the frame. The ear pads fall off a lot too. The lenses scratch really easily, but that could be just me being rough on them. The prescription insert cracked so that it still holds together, but they can’t put new lenses in them (my prescription has changed).
Customer support through Bushnell (800.222.6553) in my experience has been fairly good, sometimes they charge me for replacement nose pads, sometimes they don’t.
The real kicker for me was just the other day. It was about 40 degrees out and I was riding, it was getting dark so I went to pop the lenses out and ride home with just the Rx inserts so I could see as it got darker. The frame just snapped on me. The whole thing with these frames is that they’re flexible, and, I’m guessing because of the cold, they just weren’t flexible enough that day and they snapped.
I just bought a new pair to replace these only because the Supergo shop I went to had them on sale for $55 (and I already have the Rx inserts and a bunch of lenses). I will use these for another month or two until I find something better and then sell them off.
These things are ugly, which looses them some points in my book. It's not like I can affort glasses, sports sunglasses and sylish sunglasses, the sports glasses I own have to be good looking enough to wear on any occasion under the sun.
Last words, they get some props for value since they are amongst the cheepest Rx insertable sports glasses, but really, I'd go with the Rudy Projects. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Berf
a Cross Country Rider
from Ocala, Fl, USA
Date Reviewed: October 19, 2003 | | Favorite Trail: | Santos | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$75.00 | | Purchased At: | Mail order | | Strengths: | Nice that Bolle has realized that not everyone has 20/20 vision. The optional "prescription piece" is a good idea. Cost is fairly reasonable. | | Weaknesses: | A lot, I have had two pair of these glasses in the past 3 years. My first pair needed to be replaced due to the rubber nose piece. and rubber on the arms breaking down. That I could kinda understand due to having used them for over 2 years. My second (and last) pair of the Bolles totally sucked. I broke two lenses, one of the gray. and one of the amber ones. Said lenses actually are weak at the edges where you insert them into the frames. the frames are way too flexy. I guess that is a necessity with the ability to swap lenses. | | Similar Products Used: | Bolle,other prescription type glasses (think Magnum P.I. style) | | Bike Setup: | Schwin Homegrown Pro, XT,XTR, Easton bars, and seatpost. 22.5 lbs | | Bottom Line: | If you are an aggressive rider, or someone that spends a lot of time sweating, yo may want to consider another brand. I unfortunately wear prescription glasses, and as much as I would like to get a pair of Oakleys, I cannot afford them. I guess you get what you pay for. Needless to say I will not buy another Bolle product. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Michael
a Weekend Warrior
from St. Louis Park, MN, USA
Date Reviewed: May 17, 2003 | | Favorite Trail: | Elk River blast | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$40.00 | | Purchased At: | Performance Bike online | | Strengths: | The lenses don't scratch easily which should make it easier to get a refund. | | Weaknesses: | The lenses pop out far too easily when bouncing around. I lost both lenses 4 times and the right lense twice more on a 7 mile track. Frame is too flexible. | | Similar Products Used: | Smiths | | Bike Setup: | '02 Fisher Sugar 2+ disk | | Bottom Line: | Single worst pair of biking glases i've ever owned. I can't think of any reason anyone would want to buy them. The idea of swaping out the lenses by flexing the frame isn't bad, but the implementation is. Because the frame is so flexible, the lenses just won't stay in the frame when hitting rough single track. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Richard Reiss
a Cross Country Rider
from San Antonio, TX, USA
Date Reviewed: April 24, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | Ch'angwon City area trails in South Korea | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Price Paid: |
$160.00 | | Purchased At: | Performance | | Strengths: | Looks nice. Nothing more. | | Weaknesses: | Prescription insert does not stay in place. Insert is too close to face. Lenses are extremely difficult to change and require too much flexing of the frame. | | Bike Setup: | I am retired from racing, but my 10-year old daughter races on a 14" Trek 6700. My 8-year old son is on a Trek 240 with Chris King hubs and Sun Rhyno Lite rims until he grows another inch. | | Bottom Line: | This has got be the worst pair of cycling eyewear that I have ever owned. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Don C.
a Cross Country Rider
from San Diego
Date Reviewed: April 12, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | Lake Hodges | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$50.00 | | Purchased At: | Perfomance | | Strengths: | Quality design and construction | | Weaknesses: | None | | Similar Products Used: | Rudy Project | | Bike Setup: | Who cares... | | Bottom Line: | I agree with almost everything Eric from Boston said. These glasses do the job! They're not great looking when they're not in your helmet, but who cares? They're cycling glasses!
The grips on the temples and nosepiece work! Like Eric said, they work so well, it's hard to take them off at times... which is a good thing.
I love 'em... They are very reasonably priced and I would buy another pair in a second. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Sharon
a Weekend Warrior
from Bainbridge Island WA USA
Date Reviewed: February 11, 2002 | | Duration Product Used: | 2 Years | | Price Paid: |
$70.00 | | Weaknesses: | Unable to replace nosepiece that fell off. Cannot find a web site on internet, old address no longer good, FAX gets no response. TERRIBLE customer service. They want people who lose their nosepieces to replace with whole new goggle. | | Bottom Line: | Don't buy Bolle goggles if you think you might ever need customer service! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Eric Hansen
a Cross Country Rider
from Boston, MA
Date Reviewed: January 1, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | Lynn Woods | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$70.00 | | Purchased At: | Performancebike.com | | Strengths: | Tough, high-quality lenses; comes with 4 sets of lenses (for different lighting conditions); rubberized parts (nose rest and ear wraps) are very grippy -- no problem staying on my face on very rocky/bumpy/sweaty rides; very light and tough. | | Weaknesses: | Difficult to switch lenses (takes some considerable elbow grease); look a bit geeky (my initial thoughts, but hey they were on sale, and the pros far outweigh the geekiness factor) | | Similar Products Used: | Bolle Edge, various Vuarnet sports glasses | | Bike Setup: | Cdale F700 with good stuff | | Bottom Line: | I bought these on sale at Performance for $70. For the price, I'm convinced that these specs cannot be beat. For their retail of $110, they are still awesome glasses, although at that price (had I paid it) I would have considered some other products as well. The optics are very high quality, and the frames themselves are extremely durable. I've dropped and knocked the lenses and they don't have any scratches so far. A huge feature IMHO is the grippy rubberized earpiece tips, which really help these shades stay on your face -- so grippy, in fact, that when looped under your helmet strap, the glasses can actually be difficult to take off!
My only point of contention is the cosmetics -- they are clearly "sports specific", and a bit geeky to be wearing around the street... I think this is mainly because the lenses are a bit taller above the noseline than normal shades (which is exactly what you want when biking, since your head is generally bent down and you are looking "up" through the upper half of the lenses). HOWEVER, when I'm wearing them with a helmet, they look very cool.
Very positive overall ratings for this product (and Bolle's quality).
| | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris Layton
a Weekend Warrior
from Charlotte, NC
Date Reviewed: September 28, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | Poplar Tent | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Purchased At: | Rep gave them to me free | | Strengths: | Lenses stay clear. Quick change-out. Light on your face. Nice fog removal from the wind and turbulence inside the frames. | | Weaknesses: | The lens tends to pop out every once in a while during riding. This doesn't happen as a result of heavy drops, etc and is hard to explain. I'll be riding down the road and the lens will just drop out. | | Bike Setup: | Trek 2002 8000 Stock, except for an XT front derailler | | Bottom Line: | Great, cheap glasses that do the job. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jon
a Racer
from State College PA
Date Reviewed: April 23, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | Scotia | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$100.00 | | Purchased At: | Sunbomb.com | | Strengths: | light, strong, 4 sets of lenses, optional RX adaptor, nice small case, not too expensive, replacement lenses don't cost a fortune. | | Weaknesses: | pretty big for the "smaller" version. | | Similar Products Used: | Oakley M-frames, Oakley Eyejackets. | | Bottom Line: | Definitely a good value for the money, for nice frames and 4 sets of lenses. Replacement lenses are only $22 or so, and the RX adaptor is pretty affordable too.
I do wish they were a little smaller, since they still look big on me, but they do keep the wind out of the eyes at 45 mph.
| | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
JohnVon
a Cross Country Rider
from Huntsville, AL
Date Reviewed: November 24, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | commute | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$100.00 | | Purchased At: | peepers.com | | Strengths: | Won't Break, Lenses for any condition, Frames, Hold on face, lightweight, | | Weaknesses: | Look a little geekey | | Similar Products Used: | None | | Bike Setup: | Trek 6000 | | Bottom Line: | Good eyewear is must for me. I can wear these at night with the clear lenses. Make sure you get the SES version, it comes with 4 lenses instead of two for about the same price.
I ride daily and have had no trouble with these. Don't even know I have them on. I recomend them to anyone. These are supposedly the smaller size in bolle's line up. I wouldn't want a larger size. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Justin
a Racer
from T-Ville, NC, USA
Date Reviewed: October 8, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | All of them | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$110.00 | | Purchased At: | performancebike.com | | Strengths: | Visual clairity, thats about it | | Weaknesses: | NOSE PIECES FALL OFF, BOTH TEMPLE GUARDS FELL OUT AS WELL! | | Similar Products Used: | REEBOK, OAKLEY, SMITH, RUDY PROJECT | | Bike Setup: | TREK | | Bottom Line: | THESE SUNGLASSES ABSOLUTELY SUCKED FOR ME, I BOUGHT THEM AND WAS EXTREMELY CAREFUL, RETURNING THEM TO THERE BAG AFTER EVERY RIDE! BUT BOTH NOSE PIECES FELL OUT, BOTH TEMPLE GUARDS FELL OUT, AND NOW AFTER REGLUING THE NOSE PIECES, ONE OF THEM IS MISSING AGAIN! I HAVE HAD A HORRIBLE EXPERIENCE WITH THESE SUNGLASSES! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Daniel
a Cross Country Rider
from Barrie, Ontario, CANADA
Date Reviewed: August 5, 2000 | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Strengths: | Comfortable, stay on face, Excellent Rx option, they don't look too geeky | | Weaknesses: | "Titanium" finish wearing off in spots | | Similar Products Used: | Bolle Edge II | | Bottom Line: | I have the "Vigilante" which is the same as the Parole, except in a regular size.
These glasses are excellent for anyone who needs corrective lenses but does not want to wear contacts when riding. The Rx inserts sit very close to the main lenses and at the same angle, which means glare when riding into a low sun is minimal to nil. (Glare with the Edge IIs was unacceptable.) Also, the Rx inserts snap into the frame, so they don't have to be removed when swapping lens colours.
These glasses are available in a package that includes four different lenses (dark polarized, cinnamon, vermilion, and clear). This is the best value, and the package includes a decent carrying case.
Bolle claims that the rubber on the ear grips and nose bridge are made of some kind of material the grips better as it gets wet. This claim is 100% true, as I have ridden in humid dripping weather, with the sweat pouring off and these glasses never slip, not even when pounding over rugged trails.
The frames are extremely tough. I rode into an overhead tree which smashed my visor down into my glasses so hard that I had trouble getting my helmet off. The bridge of my nose was cut, and there was some bruising around the eye. But the frames and lenses didn't have a scratch.
They remain comfortable over 3-4 hour rides, and they don't look silly like some other glasses. My only complaint is that the "titanium" finish on the frames has worn off in one spot, but this is only cosmetic.
Recommended for anyone looking for an excellent pair of comfortable riding glasses, and especially for anyone who wants to ride with Rx lenses. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jorin Green
a Weekend Warrior
from Rosetown, Sask, Canada
Date Reviewed: August 1, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | A smooth road! | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Strengths: | Look cool, interchangable lenses, good wrap-around. | | Weaknesses: | Framewear from swapping lenses | | Similar Products Used: | Smith Sliders, Oakleys. | | Bike Setup: | Cannondale CAAD 3 with 105. | | Bottom Line: | I have the Vigilantes, which are the same glasses with a bit larger lenses. I scratched a lense on my first pair within a couple of weeks, and Bolle replaced the lenses for free... except that the replacement lenses did not fit quite right, and damaged the frames before I caught the problem. 2 weeks later, a whole new kit of glasses arrived. They are extremely comfortable, keep wind off my contacts even at 70km/h, look cool, and wear comfortably. Overall, these glasses rock! They are worth taking a serious look at. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Benjamin
a Weekend Warrior
from Hickory, NC, USA
Date Reviewed: June 11, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | Hounds Way | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Strengths: | Lightweight, Comfortable, Stays on face well even when sweating a ton, Very scratch resistant (have had over a year and have wiped them off with any cloth I had handy, use them for tennis also, and they do not have a scratch yet), Good looks | | Weaknesses: | None | | Similar Products Used: | Oakley | | Bike Setup: | Gary Fisher Mamba (standard) | | Bottom Line: | There is not a better value in sunglass wear for the sports oriented person. Can be used for every sport without worrying about scratching the lens and can be left on for driving as well. If you need a high quality super-fantastic pair of sunglasses, look no further than the Bolle Parole. The best sunglasses ever made - puts Oakley glasses to shame. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Will
a Weekend Warrior
from Lubbock, Tecas
Date Reviewed: April 28, 2000 | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Strengths: | Multiple lens options, easy to add RX lenses, light weight, good price considering that it comes with four stes of lenses, look cool | | Weaknesses: | can be heavier than some options for RX lenses | | Bike Setup: | N/A | | Bottom Line: | A very comfortable set of glasses with lens options for every condition. Good for about 40 mph before the wind inside gets to be too much, which is fine for MTB, but may not be satisfactory for road. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dan
a Cross Country Rider
from Waterford, WI, USA
Date Reviewed: April 6, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | John Muir in South. Kettle Morraine | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Strengths: | Killer styling, Bulletproof frames, good lens options | | Weaknesses: | Lenses can be a pain to put in | | Similar Products Used: | Oakley M frames | | Bike Setup: | Y2k Trek 7000 w' Ritchey Logic WCS Ti pedals | | Bottom Line: | If you're looking for good multi-sport (biking/skiing/etc.) shades which weigh nothing, are indestructable, and have several lens choices, I highly recommend these. It took a little modification with a nail file for the red lenses to fit in, but since then they've been wonderful. I don't know how many times I've face planted and these glasses keep asking for more. I give it Five flaming pairs of Cheap sunglasses. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dan
a Cross Country Rider
from Waterford, WI, USA
Date Reviewed: March 30, 2000 | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Strengths: | Very Sharp looking, very light, indestructable | | Weaknesses: | Changing lenses is kinda difficult | | Similar Products Used: | Oakley M frames | | Bike Setup: | Trek 6000 w' clipless pedals | | Bottom Line: | These are really cool sunglasses which I recommend to anybody who can afford these. They are made for a narrower face. If you have a wider face, I suggest the Vigilante which is the same atyle but a little larger. These are way better than the oakleys I tried for awhile. At least these didn't break after several hard falls while Skiing. I believe they're more impact resistant than me. The only problem is that the red lenses (my favorite)took a little modifying with a nail file to fit the frames. I give these five flamin' chili peppers 'cause these are truly awesome shades. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Brian
a Racer
from colorado springs, colorado
Date Reviewed: December 31, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
capt. jacks | | Duration Product Used: |
6 months | | Strengths: |
multiple lenses
good fit
indestructible frame | | Weaknesses: |
lens insertion and removal takes time to get used to | | Bike Setup: |
Specialized FSR comp w/ a few custom specs | | Bottom Line: | great pair of performance sun glasses, alittle bit pricey, but the performance is worth it. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kim
a Cross-Country Rider
from Willoughby, OH
Date Reviewed: September 16, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Vulture's Knob | | Duration Product Used: |
6 months | | Strengths: |
Great styling, comfortable fit. Interchangeable lenses. Decent customer support. | | Weaknesses: |
Mirrored lenses (PC Gunflash) scratch easily, two-piece nosebridge padding. Don't give enough protection around the sides or underneath the eyes. | | Similar Products Used: |
Oakley M Frames, Ray-Ban Daddy-O, (believe it or not) mirrored safety glasses. | | Bike Setup: |
Cannondale CAAD3 frame, custom-built components. | | Bottom Line: | Maybe it was a fluke. Maybe it was just destiny, but I had a disappointing experience with my Breakaway Parole glasses. Within the first few weeks, my right nosepiece came detached from the bridge, which meant the glasses had to be sent back to Bolle for repair. The mirrored lenses scratched soooo easily, and at $28 a set, it gets expensive to replace them. Thank God I never wore them on the trail. I'm going back to wearing my $8 mirrored shopglasses I picked up at the local welding shop-they've survived an entire race season without hardly a scratch. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Babette
a Downhiller
from San Clemente CA
Date Reviewed: August 24, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Moro Canyon | | Duration Product Used: |
less than 1 month | | Strengths: |
Look HOT | | Weaknesses: |
two of the lenses didn't snap in | | Similar Products Used: |
Bolle micro | | Bike Setup: |
GT LTS-1000 DS | | Bottom Line: | I got them because of the RX option but they are the coolest looking. The fact that two of the lenses didn't fit (clear and red) really pissed me off though. I didn't find that out till I needed to use the clear lens for a foggy morning ride an couldn't get em to fit. I think it's a known problem but they figure they can just replace em if someone complains. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Waveslider
a Weekend Warrior
from Redondo Beach, CA
Date Reviewed: May 26, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
less than 1 month | | Strengths: |
see below
| | Weaknesses: |
lenses are just a little cumbersome to change. I think Smith has the right idea/design | | Similar Products Used: |
Smith Slider Buzzsaw | | Bike Setup: |
n/a | | Bottom Line: | A follow up to my review below. Got my replacement pair and what a difference! the quality was so much better than the first. All the lenses snapped in securely and easily. In response to the review below: you can bend the wire temples into loops. I did and these puppies ain't coming off in the rough stuff. I'm so stoked I'm gonna bump up my rating to a 4.5 'cause of the time it takes to change lenses. What! no half points? I'll give 'em a 5!!! They look sooooo cooool!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Nathan T
a Cross-Country Rider
from Reston VA
Date Reviewed: May 22, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
1 Year | | Strengths: |
Great frame design (lighter than my old Micro Edge II's) look alot better too. Snap in perscription adapter is totally stealthy. Unlimited lens choices from Bolle (10 flavors) for every possible climate condition. | | Weaknesses: |
No ear hoops to keep them on your face when the going gets tough. | | Similar Products Used: |
Own: Micro Edge II's (no longer use them though)
Tried: Bolle Breakaway
Vigilante's but found the frames are to wide, to google like. Parole's are much better. | | Bottom Line: | Bolle has a winner with these especially if you are looking for a perscription setup that are not geeky looking. My bud's did not know I was optically challenged. I can wear these as casual sunglasses when I'm not slamming the ht on the trails. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Waveslider
a Weekend Warrior
from Redondo Bch., CA
Date Reviewed: April 20, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
less than 1 month | | Strengths: |
Light weight
Comfortable
Adjustable temples
4 sets of lenses | | Weaknesses: |
Not all lenses snapped in securely
Nose piece came unglued | | Bottom Line: | You can't beat the price for a pair of glasses when you get 4 sets of lenses. When I picked them up at Performance I went straight home and started changing the lenses per the instructions. Couldn't get the right lense to snap in properly on 2 of the 4 colors. I don't know if the quality is off on the lense shape or the frame itself. Also, the left rubber nose peice came unglued. I haven't even worn them yet!!! I'm gonna return them for a new pair. If the quality is just as bad I'm getting my $$$ back. I'll be bummed too 'cause they really look cool. | | Overall Rating: |
| |
|
Photo Caption Contest
(sponsored by Maxxis)
|
Enter here
|
|
|
$ 109.00
