Shimano FH M775L - M775S Hub

DESCRIPTION

  • Over-sized axle : 14mm
  • Quicker engagement freehub body
  • Grease sleeve for longer durability
  • Center Lock rotor mount

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-5 of 5  
[Jun 29, 2013]
Arne Eide
All Mountain Rider

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
1
Strength:

Looks cool. It's not extremely expensive.

Weakness:

Poor freehub design.

It failed after only three weeks of trail riding as the freehub mechanism broke. I could actually hear it break as I hit the pedals; it started making bad noises and the freehub body developed a lot of play. You could move the largest sprocket by 3-4 mm when pushing it back and forth.

Waiting for the freehub to be replaced by the dealer. I'll post another review if the next one works just as bad.

Similar Products Used:

Ritchey rear hub.

[Sep 08, 2010]
Philber
Cross Country Rider

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
1
Strength:

None.

Weakness:

Garbage.

The main feature of Shimano XT components is that they are solid. They're not light, they don't perform remarkably well, and they aren't incredibly cheap. But they are reliable, at least they're supposed to be. This hub has been nothing but trouble for me from day one. Broken freehub body, bent axle, another broken freehub, play that keeps coming back. This hub is a piece of junk. As such, I'm throwing it in the garbage and replacing it with a DT Swiss 240. If Shimano wants to put their XT logo on cheap crap like this hub, then I'm going to buy my parts from someone else.

Similar Products Used:

Lots.

[Aug 11, 2009]
Fernando
Racer

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
2
Strength:

It is light (410g), spins very smoothly, and have a very pro look. all for a good price

Weakness:

The strenght of the cones, and axle are weak

This hub at first is sweet because is not expensive and light.
But after 6 months it became stoked and started to produce a lot of drag.
It took me like 20 minutes hitting with a hammer to un-assmble the broken hub just to find that the trheads in the alloy axle were stripped and the cones where broken in half as the steel balls where cracked.
Also the cricket mechanism is broken

This hub is not reliable at all. Don't get caught by its lightness and low price, because this hub wont last more than a season.

Shimano needs to step foward with they new hub line.

Similar Products Used:

azonic hubs, alivio, formula

[Jun 09, 2008]
Anonymous
Cross Country Rider

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
1
Strength:

It's Shimano, which was always reliable. Good new averall design.

Weakness:

Bad design of freehub body (it has broke). Kind of dangerous when you ride fast on the trail.

Usually Shimano doesn't issue products wich weren't properly tested. But started with XTR 2007 this company stubbornly makes this faulty quick engagement freehub (36 engagement points). Is something is going wrong with this company?
My sample broke after 500 km of light cross country (one of the 4 pawls broke and blocked the freewheel).
And my accident is not an exclusion.
If you need Shimano rear hub - buy previous models (up to XT 965)

Similar Products Used:

Most of the Shimano hubs, DT-240.

[May 22, 2008]
JDub
Racer

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
1
Strength:

Cheap

Weakness:

Cassette quality - cassette blew up after 2 rides, and on this model it is not replaceable, so I had to get a new hub. Needless to say I didn't replace it with another shimano...

These new XT hubs seem attractive if you're building up a wheelset because they are cheap, but I guess there is a reason why they cost so much less than other hubs. After 2 rides, the cassette internals broke. And you can't replace the cassettes on these, so it needed a new hub.

Similar Products Used:

DT, Ringle, etc.

MTBR Newsletter

Get the latest mountain bike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the MTBR Newsletter

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2024 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.