Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 2 (2 Reviews Total)
| |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
MattDate Reviewed: April 29, 2012
Strengths: spindle diameter. Arms. Finish. StrengthWeaknesses: None.Bottom Line: This crank feels a lot more stiff than the previous one I was using. It feels just as stiff as the race face evolve dh crank I rode. I went from a holzfeller oct to this crank and I instantly feel that it is noticably stiffer due to the over sized crank spindle.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
karrikourier
a All Mountain Rider
from UKDate Reviewed: February 21, 2012
Strengths: Light, strong, great build quality, low q factor compared to rivals. The polygon interface is simply the best ive seen if you need to pull the arms off frequently.Tools included.Weaknesses: Cup type tool may mark the BB shells, wave washer preload can be confusing.( very rarely) BB shells may be too big for some frames(older foes DHS 2:1), arms may hit chainstays( intense915).Bottom Line: Top quality kit. The finish is excellent as is the design. the stiffness and low q factor are impressive when the weight is considered. Given it has a cro.mo spindle its light enough for XC/AM. You could save 200g with the XC version.
The polygon fitting is the best i have used, no splines to get damaged and a firm positive feel to tighten it down. I have heard of the arms coming loose but i cant see how if the instructions are followed. The crank arm torque is quoted in ft/lbs NOT Nm and its a lot for a bike!
Niggles:
The cup tool supplied with mine was poorly finished and would scratch the cups, it would have needed to be forced on. I recommend you use a 1 3/4" bi hex socket as suggested in the small print of the instructions, IF you can borrow one. The tool on the video instruction looks better.
The wave washer used as a preload for the crank bearings may cause confusion in fitting. If you follow the instructions and then pause the video instruction for a visual check you should be able to get it right. Slightly tight as a precaution over slightly slack, the bearing shields will loosen up quickly.
Clearance to some swing arms may be poor. On an early foes DHS mono 2:1 it will not clear unless the head angle is set slack, granted i may be the only person this ever affects.
I have heard that due to the low q factor the arms will snag on the chainstays of Intense 951 frames, again this may be a unique problem.
If you race and do a lot of fiddling with chain rings and your chain device then this should be for you on the interface alone. Add in the weight for its strength and the low q factor( this increases pedalling efficiency) and its a winner especially considering the price hike to go carbon which will chip and weaken so should not be considered so durable.
Favorite Trail: Laggan bike park
Duration Product Used: 3 months
Price Paid:
$150.00
Purchased At: NOS eBay
Similar Products Used: RF evolve DH, WI ti, Shimano M815
Bike Setup: Foes Predator,Maverick DUC.
|
Reviews 1 - 2 (2 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |