Submitted by
steelworx
a Weekend Warrior
from Valparaiso, In. , U.S.A.
Date Reviewed: November 28, 2011
Strengths: Upgradeable frame, price.
Weaknesses: Componants
Bottom Line:
Purchased as my 1st full-squish because of decent totally upgradable frame. Stripped bike down to frame & shock after I brought it home. Transferred all my higher end parts off older hard tail. Had a 120 mm Rockshox Revelation on it at 1st and loved it but steerer had been cut and was not safe to leave on bike. switched to older spare fork I had and will buy new fork & shock this winter.
Bike Setup: Deore, SLX & XT drive train, Hayes 9 Hyd. Disc. Brakes. Mavic Crossride Disc Wheelset, Fox Vanilla 130 mm Fork
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Pollution Warrior
a Weekend Warrior
from Taiyuan, Shanxi, PRC China
Date Reviewed: June 6, 2010
Strengths: Great paint work; light; very tall head tube (on the 22"); shock does what it's supposed to
Weaknesses: none I can think of
Bottom Line:
THIS IS A REVIEW FOR THE FRAME ONLY. I bought this as a new frame and put my components on it. Compared to a hard tail or a cheap full suspension it's like riding a sofa. I love it. No issues with it. I hesitated on buying it because of the Rock Shox Bar 2.1 rear shock, but it is smooth and flawless. It only does 2 things: 1- bounce, 2- allow you to adjust rebound speed. Nothing else. If you want lots of knobs to twiddle, get a different shock, but so far this one is just fine. I haven't noticed pedal bob being a problem, but I do all of my pedaling while seated. If you like to stand on the pedals and pedal aggressively you may want something else for a shock, but the frame is awesome.
Submitted by
wingsbum
a Cross Country Rider
from Vancouver, WA
Date Reviewed: February 4, 2010
Strengths: Best parts of this bike, the price, the frame and the seat
Weaknesses: wheels are garbage, rear derailleur, front derailleur not great
Bottom Line:
Great bike to upgrade. If you don't have money to drop on an expensive bike at once the Four is a great frame and can be upgraded overtime. I decided to go with the Kona four instead of the four supreme because I wanted to upgrade and have a one of a kind bike. Great climber and cross country bike. As of right now the bike receives 5 chillis for value and overall rating but from the factory only 4.
Bike Setup: Cane Creek zonos wheelset
FSA carbon bars
Sunline V-one stem
Sette carbon seatpost
wtb deva ti
Shimano XT front and rear derailleur
Kona Wah-Wah pedals
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
WaveHorse
a Weekend Warrior
from Los Angeles, Ca.
Date Reviewed: December 10, 2009
Strengths: The frame is the same as the Deluxe and Superior
Weaknesses: The component selection for the Deluxe gives you a LOT more for only $300 more. Hayes Hydraulic Brakes, XT rear derailleur, lighter wheels, Fox shock with rebound, Rock Shox Recon SL which is under 4 lbs.
Bottom Line:
My old bike had the same component mix as the Four. SRAM 5 components, and Hayes Cable Brakes are clunky. The Deluxe is lighter, smoother, everything just feels better. It's worth the extra $300. (Just riding in a parking lot, the difference is obvious.)
On the Deluxe the only items that need replacing are the pedals, and seat post....both are very heavy. (And on the Four) Further weight reductions can be made with the stem and handlebars.
Similar Products Used: I tested the Four and bought the Deluxe
Four - $800
Deluxe - $1100
Four frame set - $380 (Rock Shox)
Deluxe frame set - $450 (Fox)
From Wheel World.
Bike Setup: Stock
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
fyslice
a Weekend Warrior
from Manila, Philippines
Date Reviewed: September 22, 2008
Strengths: Fantastic design, lightweight, great handling, very reliable, parts that came in stock are already enough for me to stick with it.
Weaknesses: brakes. Shimano deore mis shifts every once in awhile and needs a tune up every now and then.
Bottom Line:
Again, the fantastic design. This bike is fun to ride. i do mostly off road, single tracks and it is very, very reliable. Uphills are quite easy to contend with and the suspensions are awesome considering that it is their entry level FS mountain bike, making comfort an important factor for the chili's i placed.
I love this bike. it's solid, strong and it has not let me down.
Similar Products Used: no other bike so far. it's my first mountain bike. Borrowed a GT hardtail for my first ride.
Bike Setup: stock. Nothing changed....yet.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Joose
a Cross Country Rider
from Iron Mountain, MI, United states
Date Reviewed: June 4, 2008
Strengths: Awesome frame design, Light weight, super strong, best bang for the buck full sussy out there
Weaknesses: Have to agree with the brakes, garbage. wheels
Bottom Line:
The bottom line on the Kona four is that its a total blast to ride. I ride primarily xc and single track. It handles amazingly on the rocky single tracks around here (upper Michigan), and takes smoothish descents excellently, not to mention it climbs super smooth and takes the steeps pretty easy. After my first 2 rides my front tire is already off center, going to have to take it to the shop to get that honed in, i don't know if that was from the rides, or if the wheel just wasn't perfect from the shop.
If you are looking for a full suspension machine at an awesome price, with decent components and want a guaranteed need for fun and speed, this is a ride for you! If you are wanting a bike that can handle the big rough stuff and drops, i wouldnt suggest this to you.
Submitted by
John
a Cross Country Rider
from Poulsbo, WA
Date Reviewed: May 25, 2008
Strengths: Excellent frame design. Light weight but beefy where it counts. Fantastic starting platform for a good XC sussy.
Weaknesses: Brake levers are garbage. M4 disc brakes are OK, better than V-Brakes, but pretty low end on the disc market.
Bottom Line:
Build impression: Frame is a great design, butted tubes are an interesting hexagon shape. Only 2 round tubes on the whole thing, on the seat tue and the chain stay. The bike is not too heavy for a sussy (under 30 lbs with trail kit and should make a great XC ride. Welds are superb.
Brakes: The Avid brake levers are garbage. No adjustability other than lever stops. I ditched them for a set of Avid 2.0s I had on my hard tail. Changed the hayes M4s from On/Off to having some modulation. Ditched the front hayes for an Avid BB from my hard tail. Much smoother operation. These are around $60 now, so I will probably pick one up for the rear as well.
Seat: Seat is pretty damned good for a stocker. WTB with stitched panels and a decent cutout. Its also not too tall, so getting off of the saddle for steep stuff should be no problem.
Drive train: Coming from my old STX-RCs the Deore shifters are a step up. I've never been a shifter snob, as long as they work, i'm happy. These are super smooth and click easily. The Deore derailure also seems to be decent if not a little noisy on some rough sections. Time will tell if it holds up to trail abuse.
Suspension: Never been a big fan of Rock Shocks but for a price point set of suspenders, these seem to be decent enough. Both shock and fork have rebound adjustments. The Dart fork also has a 90% lockout switch which will come in handy on long ascents. Setting sag on the fork is non-existant so far. I am 180 lbs and the springs are just too new and stiff to give any, even with the preload all the way out. A few good rides should soften it up enough to set it up properly though. The rear shock is an air preload and was fairly easy to setup with a shock pump. 20 minutes with the pump and a caliper and I had it dialed in at 130psi.
Wheels/Tires: Wheels are unmarked Alex's. A tad lighter than my Sun Rhino Lites (suprise). Hopefully they stand up to abuse. The bike came specd with Maxxis Ignitors. An interesting choice considering that Kona is a NW company and most of the riding up here is moist rooty forest trails with little hard pack. I swapped them out for my IRC Mythos set from my hard tail before the first ride but after loosing the front on the more open sections of Gold Creek trail, I may swap the front out for something a little more meaty.
First Ride: Took it out to Green Mountain today and hit up the Gold Creek trail. This bike is a fantastic climber. Over loose rocky sections and dirt, the back end hooked up and dug in with zero rear suspension movement except when hitting bumps or drop outs. When I was tooling around the parking lot and on a kiddie ride with the family I though that the stem might need to be longer but on the ride it felt great. The bike is plenty responsive, light enough to toss around and everything just works. Rough downhill sections were dealt with handily and it railed through the rest of it with great speed (hence the need for something more grippy in the front to avoid washout. Only my tired legs kept me from going faster.
Full suspension bikes have come a long way since I ditched my old Trek Y bike back in '98 and went back to a hard tail. Back then, sussys were heavy, handeled like crap in single track and basically had crap suspension. I've kept to the hard tail all these years because it is light, responsive and reliable (KISS). It looks like manufacturers have finally pulled their heads out of the sand and realized that not everybody wants to be a cool free ride/DH dude with a 40 pound bike and that most casual/sport riders are XC riders and don't need such over the top kit. The Four offers an amazing Scandium/Aluminium frame that keeps the weight to a minimum while still being tough enough for serious trail use. The low end components weigh a bit more than high end spec, but can cheaply be upgraded if you want to reduce the weight more. The 4 bar suspension climbs well and offers a good amount of sproing for the single track down hill that is predominant here in the Olympic peninsula of Washington. Overall, I found the basic Four to be the best value when compared to the other versions offered by Kona. The move to hydraulic disc for the next model up and slightly better drive train wasn't worth the extra $600. Beyond that, you are getting into racer territory on price/weight.
Excellent job Kona! 4 chilis because the brake levers really are crap.
Bike Setup: All stock except for inline comments below.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
BOO
a Cross Country Rider
from Ruston, Louisiana
Date Reviewed: March 25, 2008
Strengths: Very light given the component class. Slick steering and the handling is great. Very agressive setup. I heard a lot about Kona and decided to give them a try - very happy with my choice. This is my first full suspension, and coming from years of riding a hardtail I'm really happy with this bike.
Weaknesses: None so far - I got what I paid for on the components. I'll upgrade as I go along though since I have a great frame to start with now.
Bottom Line:
Great bang for the buck. This was one of the least expensive full suspension bikes that I found, and I liked the looks and feel of this one better than the others anyway. The scandium frame is super light, so I can build from that as I go along if/when I want to upgrade. I ride mainly xc and single track, and this bike works perfectly for that. If you are going to be doing major drops and all mountain stuff, you may want to opt for the Kona Dawg. The Four is light enough to race (especially if I upgrade some components over time) and tough enough to take what I'll throw at it.
I have a Canon 50D, but I'm a smaller dude and I really don't like carrying it in my Camelbak (or any other bag while riding, for that matter). I just saw these mirrorless cameras Read More »
We need four volunteers for our Sea Otter Classic MTB Fondo Training. This is a program on and off the bike.
You must be able to make it to Mountain View on Mon/Wed mornings at Read More »
Embarrassed about this situation but about four weeks ago on a Sunday evening, I really enjoyed the Smuttynose Gravitation. But during the night, I woke up all queasy but unable t Read More »
