The Rockhopper is a time-tested XC hardtail built for cruising fire roads and slicing through singletrack. Equipped with Tektro disc brakes and a custom-tuned SR Suntour suspension fork with lockout, the Rockhopper combines performance with value in a package every rider will appreciate.
Fully butted M4 alloy frame for lightweight confidence over the roughest trails
Custom-tuned SR Suntour 80mm-travel suspension fork with hydraulic damping, proprietary Spike Valve, lockout with lightweight magnesium lowers, and alloy steerer delivers the supple ride qualities of a high-end fork
Light and durable double-walled alloy rims are tough enough to handle the rough stuff; Specialized The Captain Sport tires lend a perfect knob pattern for diverse conditions
Specialized The Captain Sport tires lend a perfect knob pattern for diverse conditions
SR Suntour replaceable-ring crankset uses Shimano's sealed cartridge bearing, Octalink-splined, BB interface for reliable power transfer and ease of service
Tektro Draco hydraulic disc brakes with dual pistons and forged calipers assure precision braking and durability
Shimano Alivio 9-speed rear derailleur and Rapidfire trigger shifters for reliable, high-end performance; Shimano 9-speed, 11-34t cassette offers gearing options for a variety of terrain types
Shimano 9-speed, 11-34t cassette offers gearing options for a variety of fitness levels
Submitted by
sknhgy
a Weekend Warrior
from Alton, IL, USA
Date Reviewed: October 9, 2011
Strengths: Light weight. Good design.
Weaknesses: Drive train.
Bottom Line:
I like the design of this bike but have had too many problems with the shifting. The chain used to fall off the small chainring. Then the chain would stick to the middle chainring when going from mid to smallest. Recently lost the lockout knob off the fork. The shifting still isn't great and I'm in the process of replacing the stock BB cartridge with on with a longer stem in order to get better shifting. Just too many problems for a $720 bike.
Submitted by
masterlucasdude
a Weekend Warrior
from Nampa, ID, USA
Date Reviewed: June 6, 2011
Strengths: Great frame, seat, and nice fork.
Weaknesses: Crankset, shifters (mainly the front shifter, and wheels
Bottom Line:
First off Ken's bike shop has many nice bikes and fairly priced but absolutely do not stand behind their products.
I have already had to replace the wheels. Don't try hopping any curbs with the stock wheels; they just aren't sturdy enough. The most irritating part is the front shifter. This bike continually drops into a lower gear on it's own in the most inopportune times. This caused the center ring in the front gears to completely bend as I was on a steep climb. I bought this '09 Rockhopper brand spanking new last year and have already had to replace the wheels to a rhyno suntour wheelset (way sturdier), replaced the crankset to a shimano SLX (much smoother and stronger), and am about to switch out the stupid front shifter any day now. The sram x4 on it really really should be thrown in the trash and never be considered to be put on any bike. Well maybe a child's bike. This bike is a great frame but the components on it suck. I am really loving it after I have put an additional $450 + into it.
Submitted by
Erikgrvcty
a Weekend Warrior
from Houston, Tx
Date Reviewed: February 20, 2011
Strengths: Weight, price, looks, and handling
Weaknesses: Stock rims (Alex Rims) and breaks (UP GRADE TO DISC)
Bottom Line:
I'm 6'2" and weigh in at 235lbs, so I'm a bit of a Clydesdale. I ride a base 2009 21" Rockhopper that I bought in the spring of 2010 at my LBS. It's a great starter bike with some decent components and only minor problems.
The only two weaknesses that I can see on this bike are the rims and breaks. The rims just aren't up to my specs because they seem to come untrue easily. I'm a weekend worrier that xc rides and doesn't do anything crazy on my bike. IMO there is no reason, other than maybe my weight, that my rims shouldn't be true after only a handful of rides. My only other complaint is the rim breaks that came with the bike lack the stopping power that is required for a person of my size after only 6 months of use and 2 trips to the LBS for tightening. I only wish that my LBS would have warned me of this when I bought the bike because I would have upgraded to disc on the spot.
I plan to upgrade to a set of Avid bb7s breaks and a new set of rims shortly. Other than those two minor issues it is an amazing bike that handles well and is very light IMO. I have also ridden my brother-in-law's stock Giant (not sure what model but know it was around $650 new) and was very pleased to find that my bike handled better and was faster. So after about 300 miles of riding I feel that I can say that the base Rockhopper is a great starter bike for someone that is new to the sport but I would recommend upgrading to disc breaks. Also IMO the frame would be a great base to build a bike off of on a low budget.
Submitted by
Space Seed
a Cross Country Rider
from Amherst mass U S A
Date Reviewed: January 29, 2011
Strengths: Steel. Great looking red and just a beautiful bike. great handling too.
Weaknesses: none
Bottom Line:
I really use this as a trail bike, not really a mountain hard core rider. Getting older ! you know. i love these cromoly steel bikes. this one i bought from a person who just really had no use for it. it was in like new condition, so i paid a bit for it. Bike companies really don't make them like this anymore. Unless you pay big money for a custom. A bike like this will never let you down. You can always change the components later if need be. If you see one that is in good shape , get it. just dry it off, when it gets wet , and it will last forever, but you will not !!
Similar Products Used: old mongoose, Schwinn , Giant
Bike Setup: basic bike parts shimano cheap parts, but work fine
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
dancingoutlaw
a Weekend Warrior
from simpsonville, sc
Date Reviewed: December 1, 2010
Strengths: Handles well, good brakes, great shifters, front suspension soaks up pretty much anything I've thrown at it going downhill. Light weight, climbs well on smoother trails, seems very durable.
Weaknesses: Stock grips are worthless, front derailleur sometimes changes from 2nd sprocket to 1st on steep climbs in very low gear, stock tire tubes easily damage, climbing rooted and leaf covered trails, the tires lose traction very easily, with damp conditions they're downright dangerous.
Bottom Line:
This is my first mountain bike and I seriously considered a comparably priced Cannondale and Trek but I have no regrets about my purchase. I plan on replacing the stock grips and getting different tires as soon as possible and those are probably the only mods. I will make before I eventually upgrade to a full suspension bike.
Submitted by
guyute920
a Weekend Warrior
from Appleton, Wisconsin
Date Reviewed: July 29, 2010
Strengths: Frame! M4 frame Used on older stumpjumpers
Weaknesses: Components, Fork is okay
Bottom Line:
I was comparing the trek 4300 with this bike and just liked the feel of the rockhopper way better. Also, I figure since the frame rocks I can always upgrade components as I go. My wife thinks bikes shouldn’t cost more than $200. At least I’ll have more time to ride after she gets the credit card bill and divorces me….
Similar Products Used: My first REAL mountain bike and I think I am in love.
Bike Setup: Stock
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
purplehopper
a Weekend Warrior
from illinios
Date Reviewed: July 3, 2010
Strengths: Rock solid,
Weaknesses: none
Bottom Line:
My 93 Rockhopper is the best bike I have owned. After snapping the head off my last bike I spent the money on a bike that could take my punishment, 6-3 and 206. Little did I know that it would have lasted this long. My only issus has been brake pas and snapping the chain twice. This bike is so easy to handle and maneuver you don't even have to think or worry that it won't do what you ask it to. As far as a climber, I'm not sure you could beat it. You just point and go. I can't say enough about this bike. There is always the urge to buy a new " upgraded " hopper, but mine still holds it own. She may be purple, but she hasn't stranded me yet.
Similar Products Used: I can't remember that far back.
Bike Setup: stock,altus a10, specialized rims, tires etc.. except for powerchain, trico sports memoflex seat, new brakepads and bar ends
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
brownplus
a Cross Country Rider
from gso, nc, usa
Date Reviewed: June 2, 2010
Strengths: strength, geometry, price
Weaknesses: don't make'em like they used to
Bottom Line:
a beautiful thing considering what it cost(s), amazing, ultimate bike for the money and considering it was part of a large production mass-manufacturing thingy. these are not all the same! owned the later version cr-mo with bigger tubes...not as nice a ride. I was a bike courier in seattle, a semi-pro mtn. biker and have owned way too many bikes. i rode this originally as a courier and thought...kinda heavy, but damn smooth and the geometry is perfect (as good or better than the brodie and kona...specialized was on the cusp of the long top tube revolution waaay back when) Sold it like all dumb youngins do, but just found one in my size recently and the magic came back. Use it for training so I can at least perform .5assed on my 29'er fisher aluminum. If you are going suspension get aluminum, if going stock get steel. And of all the steel I have owned, few if any beat the rockhopper ride...a bit heavy yes, but pure joy and smooth rolling magic??? YES! WIll never sell it and I can't say that for any of the others above!!! Though I really wish I had kept the brodie.........sob.
Submitted by
flopyphish
a Weekend Warrior
from Provo, UT, USA
Date Reviewed: January 26, 2010
Strengths: Frame, Front Shock,
Weaknesses: Derailleurs
Bottom Line:
The 2009 Specialized Rockhopper (MSRP $610) is worth every penny you pay. When looking at its component configuration you’ll see that compared to other mid-tier mountain bikes, the RockHopper has the best overall value. It is sturdy, relatively light weight, and the components work well. When comparing it to the HardRock (MSRP $390) you can tell that it has a much more aggressive and sturdy feel. Having ridden the two bikes it is apparent that the HardRock is a low-end mountain bike. Although the HardRock does well for those with no desire to become aggressive riders, when it comes to someone who wants to jump headfirst into some more difficult mountain biking, the RockHopper is by far the best choice. By paying just a couple hundred dollars more than the cost of the HardRock, you’ll get a riding experience very comparable to that of the StumpJumper (MSRP $1550). Although the RockHopper’s mid-tier components (such as the derailleurs) demonstrate this bike is not made for top level competition and day after day beatings on the trail, taking it out once a week and making sure to keep it tuned will ensure that it always rides smooth. This bike is very well built. It has a lifetime warranty on the frame, an excellent front shock (RockShox Dart 3), and if you upgrade with a cheap pair of clipless pedals, no trail will stand a chance.
Submitted by
Dave
a Cross Country Rider
from Jackson, MI, USA
Date Reviewed: September 10, 2009
Strengths: the name brand, frame size
Weaknesses: shifters
Bottom Line:
i purchased this bike mainly for its size. 14.5 it was the perfect size i was looking for. slightly small. after ridin for a while i have grown to love the craftsmanship that Specialized makes. after 1 month i dumped the gripshifters with thumb clickers, then replaces the crappy foot clip peddles with BMX oddyssey black widdow, then the seat and traded my seat post with a friend. this bike then kicked some major ass for a while making my friend jealous causing him to buy a full suspension stump jumper for $1000,, HA. im not taking it out of retirement looking at repainting it maybe but deffinately changing out the front and rear derailers. this is the only bike i will ever purchase. i will rock this thing when my son is 20 even if it is 30 years old. if i can get some new decals power coating wont be a problem in years to come.
Bike Setup: 97' Rockhopper A1 Aluminum FS with Rock Shox Indy C forks
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
daleksic
a Cross Country Rider
from Orlando, Florida, USA
Date Reviewed: May 30, 2009
Strengths: Cheap. Reliable. Will grow with you. Indestructible. Light, 27lbs to start.
Weaknesses: It comes with cheap components, especially the cassette (SRAM 830) which was done after 400 miles. My LBS upgraded to an 850 for free and now I run an 8-speed XT with a SRAM 890 chain and it's solid.
Bottom Line:
Great Bike for the Money, nothing else comes close. This is a bike you buy as a beginner and grow with; upgrade stuff as it wears out or breaks and it just keeps on working. I started with small rides on weekends; now i use it for Urban Assaults, Jumps, XC Rides, Black Diamond Trails, etc...
As your riding level increases you will find yourself upgrading to better components. Fork should be good for 2-3 years before you need to upgrade. I will definitely recommend to go with the Disk version rather than the V-brakes, however the Alex wheels this thing comes with are good enough for Yellow and Blue trails only and won't hold up beyond that once you get more aggressive.
My wife told me that I can upgrade to the Stumpjumper when my Rockhopper brakes.... no luck yet ;)
The bottom line is that if you can afford go with the Highend (or Higher end) Rockhopper or Stumpjumper HT as they come with better forks (2nd most expensive think on your bike), if not the base rockhopper has the same frame as the more expensive one and you can always build on it. If budget is an issue look at the HardRock as it is a solid Bike as well.
Bike Setup: Rockhopper Base, upgraded to Avid BB7 Disk brakes, Avid Ti Levers, DT Swiss 420SL Wheels, shorter Stem, 8-speed XT Cassette and SRAM 890 chain. Upgraded all cables/wires.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
FireLikeIYA
a Weekend Warrior
from Gilbert, AZ
Date Reviewed: May 22, 2009
Strengths: Great geometry, Comfortable seat, Light for the $, fast rolling tires, comfortable grips, decent rear shifting, Dart 3 fork, lifetime frame warranty, free tune ups for life from LBS I bought it from. Overall good beginer bike.
Weaknesses: Not much bike for $. Cranks, pedals, poor front shifting that constantly needs to be adjusted, fast rolling tires dont stick in sand, doesn't have lock-on grips, back rim was not straight from new, rims are week for heavier riders (190 lbs +), Didnt realize how much that Dart 3 weighed until I upgraded.
Bottom Line:
Good beginner bike. I upgraded mine only because my brother offered to buy my parts. Bought the bike to mainly ride around the neighborhood with the family and occasionally go mtn biking. Ended up really liking the mtn bike thing. After upgrading I can notice a difference in quality of parts. Would not recommend this bike if you are a novice and this is coming from someone who has only mtn biked for 6 months, however, my bike is lighter than a stumpjumper HT and cost me a couple hundred less in the end after upgrades.
Bike Setup: All stock except: Rockshox SID Team with pushloc, ODI Ruffian lock-on grips, SRAM X.9 shifters and front/rear derailleurs, XTR cn-7701 chain, SLX cranks, XT cassette, AVID SL brake levers, Panaracer XC tires.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
tufftybob
a Weekend Warrior
from Deddington, Oxfordshire, UK
Date Reviewed: May 9, 2009
Strengths: Light weight(for the time); fast; tough; smooth comfortable ride; looks great in bright red with yellow decals and black components; ideal frame size (16.5") and excellent tyres (ground control) for dirt riding
Weaknesses: stock groupset (Shimano Altus A10/20 bar shifters) complete shiiite! gear shifters broke or wore out after only 700 miles. frame size of 16.5" is way too small to use a rear rack with anything other than tiny panniers as feet keep hitting bigger panniers while pedalling as seat stay angle is too shallow
Bottom Line:
Stock set up with Shi(t)mano Altus A10/A20 shifters and mechs not good enough for the price I paid. I have used three sets of pedals and bar grips, have just had to replace the original 'dual control' integrated gear shifters and brake levers because some cheap piece of crap in the rear gear rapid fire plus shifter wore out after 700 miles. Brakes were good enough for me (altus cantilevers) but now I'm using non integrated v brakes and some better shifters. Bike was laid up for a good few years due to poor health so still have some original parts on the bike including, unbeleivably the ground control tyres. Bike has NEVER been left outside once in 16 years, so still looks as good as new(ish). Kinda wish I had gone for the Future Shock/Rock Shox option at time but that would have been an extra £200!
Favorite Trail: none at mo as just moved here from Somerset
Duration Product Used: More than 3 years
Price Paid:
$1200.00
Purchased At: DJ Cycles, Frome, So
Similar Products Used: multiple other cheap and or used bikes too many to list but including: Falcon Rapier(12sp road bike) stolen in 1985, Apollo Colorado (12sp nasty cheap mtb)nicked in 1993, as well as at least four others stolen including Elswick Tornado (hybrid/racing bike I had put together myself in 1985 from bits - stock frame and forks; campagnolo 15sp gears, chain rings, down tube shifters, and racing brakes; 27.25" campagnolo chrome wheels; leather saddle and home-made handlebars, before the term hybrid was even invented for bikes)
Bike Setup: stock 1993 rockhopper set up with rigid frame and forks; some groupset changes over time, now using NON INTEGRATED deore V brakes and levers and alivio rapid fire plus gear shifters. Still using original mechs, chainrings, chain and rear cogs. original specialized air gel saddle still feels great; cateye lights and computer
Looking at a couple of different used bikes, and would appreciate your opinions.
2011 Marin Alpine Trail 29er - 19"
[url=http://www.marinbikes.com/2011/bike_specs.php?serialnum Read More »
I'm thinking about getting a Rockhopper and I have a couple questions. This is the description of the fork from the specialized website.
Custom-tuned SR Suntour 80mm-travel sus Read More »
Hey guys, new to the forum, not mountain biking, I did a search and couldn't find anything that helped. I am currently deployed to Bahrain, Manama and I purchased a new bike before Read More »
Just curious about all these 650b conversions. I have a 95 rockhopper and been wondering if it would be a good candidate for conversion. I only know the basics about bike mechanic Read More »
A few years back I needed a new bike. I mainly rode on paved bike trails or gravel, real basic stuff. I picked up a Trek 3900 for $350 and really liked the bike a lot. However, Read More »
