Similar Products Used: 2005 Giant XTC1
2004 Cannondale f1000sl team sobe
Bike Setup: stock except 90mm truvativ stem, racing ralph tires, prolite armad wheels.
a Cross Country Rider
from Bolingbrook, Illinois, USA
Date Reviewed: December 20, 2009
Strengths: Light, Stiff and Responsive
Weaknesses: Paint chips really easily as some reviewers have noted and the most uncomfortable seat ever. Mountain Kings 2.2 has notable rolling resistance.
So far so good and loving it. Very responsive ride. Fox fork is smooth and when it is locked out, it is locked out. No shallow bob like rock shox. Only been riding in wider tack gravel paths lately for winter riding conditions. I have yet to take this out on the winding singletracks with fast switchbacks and varying terrains of tree roots and rocks. SLX components are okay. I will update this post later.
Similar Products Used: Trek 8000, Gary Fisher Piranha
Bike Setup: 2009 Scott Scale 40, Fox 100mm Fork, XT/SLX components, Mountain King 2.2 tires, Alex XC44 wheels, Scott house brand handlebar, stem, seatpost and saddle
a Cross Country Rider
from Iloilo City, Philippines
Date Reviewed: December 13, 2009
Strengths: In my opinion, its a really tough frame. Ive been taking it almost everywhere i go and between destinations are some crap condition roads and a few speed bumps that double as jumps. Its a strong frame for me. im 183 pounds by the way.
Strengths: I'm a roadie who took the plunge into MTB. I did alot of research and demo'd quite a few bikes b/f I choose the Scott Scale 40. I wanted a hard tail xc bike that had discs a quality lock out fork w/ at least 100mm travel, decent components and was relatively light(yeah, still a roadie at heart)and most importantly is responsive and the scale 40 fit the bill and billfold - lol. So far, I couldn't be happier riding local single tracks and the bike has given me confidence to try up & downhills that I otherwise wouldn't attempt.
Weaknesses: I find the oem grips too be uncomfortable - will swap them out. No biggie.
Great, fast and light bike. I highly recommend it to anyone looking for a serious MTB that will allow the them to grow into the sport. Solid aluminum frame and smooth fork. For XC single track riding its just a well made and overall great bike.
Similar Products Used: Demoed fisher, trek, & giant.
Bike Setup: 2008 white/red paint. Juicy 3.5 hyrdo brakes, fox 100mm, xt rear, lx front & crank, alex wheels and scott tires.
a Cross Country Rider
from Seattle, WA USA
Date Reviewed: August 18, 2009
Strengths: Nice geometry. Top tube/seat tube dimensions are ideal for twisty singletrack and my dimensions. Very maneuverable for me. Frame is stiff, yet surprisingly comfortable for an oversized aluminum framed hardtail. Power transfer is outstanding on the short, power climbs and steep sections.
Weaknesses: Paint chips easily--paper thin.
So far, I really like how my Scott Scale 40 rides. It's a nice bike with spot-on geometry for me. I'm 5'10 and chose a medium sized frame in order to get the top tube length I wanted. My previous bike was a size "Large" Klein Attitude, and it was a little long. The Scott is much more maneuverable for me in tight, twisty singletrack, with better standover height. The Fox fork is very nice, smooth with lots of travel. All components seem solid, if not flashy. Shimano components just plain work for me, and the SLX cranks are absolutely stiff and beefy without a hint of flex even when stomping up steep singletrack seated and in the middle ring. I'm withholding judgement on the Avid brakes--so far, they stop nicely, and modulate smoothly. We'll see how long they stay that way, though...The Scott is also surprisingly comfortable--my Klein Attitude would beat me up after an afternoon of singletrack or fireroad riding, but the Scott seems more comfortable. I attribute that to the heavily shaped tubing. The Klein had essentially round tubing except for the chainstays. The Scott Scale has nary a round tube anywhere, with the exception of the seattube.
My one gripe is the paint. One fireroad jaunt and three chips appeared. My Klein never once had a single paint chip in 6 years of service. Granted, my Klein had a beautiful and tough powdercoat, but Scott should do better than this one-micron layer of cheap, flaky paint. I know, I know, it's a mountain bike...but still.
Overall, a nice hardtail, which is becoming more difficult to find these days (a shame). I still don't have any desire to go full suspension. It suits my "stay-in-the saddle and stomp" riding style. I deduct 1 point for the apparently paper thin Taiwanese paint job.
Similar Products Used: Klein Attitude w/ full Shimano XT, Judy.
Bike Setup: Stock with the exception of Thomson Masterpiece seatpost, Selle Italia Signo saddle.
a Cross Country Rider
from sheffield UK
Date Reviewed: July 19, 2009
Strengths: Fast, Strong frame, Good Brakes Fantastic forks!! and Looks the Bizz!!
Weaknesses: Paint wore through where the workstand holds the top tube even with Rubber protection..Crap bars too narrow and Seat far too hard.
This bike is great..I am heavy and the bike takes all i can give it without any problems at all. Changed the bars and seat..Also have another set of wheels with road tyres that i can switch in minutes with the same rotors fitted. A fantastic all rounder and good kit for the money.
a Weekend Warrior
from Bunya, Australia
Date Reviewed: December 27, 2007
Strengths: Excellent Frame & Shocks
Weaknesses: Rims let me down. Rear tacoed and buckled in first week. Front still going well though. Kept the LX hub and had a Mavic 321 built onto it. No problems since.
Withe teh exception of the light alex rim giving out (i'm 85kg and can get sideways in the air!). I've given this bike a good nudge at all the trails around Bunya and Mt Cootha and she loves it. The 2.4 WTB up front has given me ooodles more grip up front especially down at 25-30psi. The FOX shock is 1st class.
Bike Setup: Pretty much as stock with new rear rim, WTB Mutano Raptor 2.4 on the front.
a Cross Country Rider
from Balikpapan, Indonesia
Date Reviewed: November 5, 2007
Strengths: Nice red racer looks--light and fast--works well on cross country trails--geometry is comfortable and fits agressive riding.
Weaknesses: Haven't found any yet...
A nice hardtail to add your quiver. If you're looking for a light and affordable rig (400 USD for frame), the Scott 40 is a great place to begin. I've added a few higher end components to my build because I was looking for light, strong bike to balance out with my Specialized Epic Marathon.
Bike Setup: Fox100RLC forks--Mavic Crossmax SLR wheelset--XTR M970 group set--Ritchey WCS bars and stem--Panaracer tubeless tires
Date Reviewed: October 11, 2007
Weaknesses: Wheels are quite heavy and would expect better cassette and perhaps XT kit if I'd paid the retail price ($2200 in the UK!)
Beautiful riding bike with excellent geometry and frame but the stock bike is too expensive and the bars/stem need changed out straightaway unless your a devout racer/speed-freak. I went for a 100mm stem (110mm stock) and 640mm risers (580mm flatbar stock) and swapped the wheels for a spare pair, and the bike is now top notch all round. Would have liked better kit than deore brakes and LX shifters/cranks and the cassette is a heavy HG50 type. Surely for the money they could fit XT cranks and brakes? Anyway, the ride more than makes up for it and the frame has some nice detailing and certainly looks the part in gloss red/white. A good frame for upgrading as the stock parts are all heavy (post, stem, cass, etc.)
a Cross Country Rider
from Claremont, CA USA
Date Reviewed: August 30, 2007
Strengths: Lightweight, strong frame with great geometry and fit. Very nice component group and I love the integrated shifters.
Weaknesses: The only thing I could take issue with was the seat. The Scott stock race seat was very comfortable but had too much flex and squeaked to the point of madeness
I rode several bikes before deciding on the Scott Scale 40. The Gary Fisher, Rocky Mountain, Trek and others were nice but but the Scott offered the best set-up for the money and was far and away the most comfortable bike out of all the I rode. If your in the market for a new bike I would make sure you test drive a Scott before you speed your money.
Similar Products Used: Trek, Rocky Mountain, Gary Fisher.
Bike Setup: Stock with changes made to the handlebars, added a Easton carbon riser bar in lue of the stock Scott flat bar. New seat, Bontrager team race.
Date Reviewed: July 31, 2007
Weaknesses: weight, a bit porky 1.6 kilos
This review is for the red colored 07 scale 40 frame, 7005 aluminium. I got this frame for free because i race for a local Scott team, on the components i cant say anything because i swapped components to the new frame, I can only comment that they are much lighter, so my bike is at least 2 kilos lighter than the stock scale 40. The bike looks slick, that red is very racy, gets attention, so in graphics and esthetics, great. The geometry has surprised me very positively, it´s fast, stiff, it´s low with noticable sloping and more vertical angles, so it´s snappy and quick, and at the same time stable because of the thick aluminium tubes. The rear "box" design translates energy very well. I always suffered from back pain, my last bike was a titanium ht, still my back hurt, and for some reason with the scales geomtry I have adapted great and my back dont hurt anymore. I suppose the stans tubless helps in that department. My only complain is weight, the frame is a bit porky, with my previous old school titanium frame, my bike was 9.80 kilos, i thought it would be lighter with the scale and now is 10.3 kilos, so thats like 500grams extra, i don´t know where they came from, the frame plus the long cable housings i suppose, anyway I don´t mind at all considering how good this bike fits me, for the record i use a 17.5 frame with a short stem 7.5mm And it´s not a cheap frame or 800 bucks retail, this is a finely crafted, technologically advanced aluminum frame. Now i am saving for the Carbon fiber Scale, maybe as my next xmas present, as it´s my dream bike, my teammates use it and that´s something else!!!! 4 chilis because of the weight. there are much lighter aluminum frames out there.
I'm riding a Scott Scale 40 (with V-Brakes) and I got kinda stuck figuring out how I can reduce the weight further without resorting to drastic measures (i.e. keeping it to $1 USD/g saved if possible). My goal is to hit the 8.5kg mark, but there are a few components I would like to keep as fa ... Read More »
I would like to find out if this Aerozine headset can fit my Scott Scale 40 (2010) frame. I have attached photos of the Aerozine headset and the stock headset that came with my Scott Scale 40 frame. Thanks in advance :)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]783763[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]783764[/A ... Read More »
So my 4.5 year old is starting to get into trail riding with his little bmx bike. The other day when we were riding, he asked why I had gears and he didn't. I really didn't have a good answer for him. According to him, he doesn't need them, why do I? A valid point I think. So my 1x9 has become ... Read More »
Any minor or major upgrades to the scale? New to mountain riding and feel like i'm going to go over the handle bars on the downhill. 6 foot 90kg's. Climbs like a beast but 'so so' downwards. Thanking you.Read More »
Sorry for the spam, however I am trying to sell my ex's Small Scott Scale 40 for her.
Bike has been well taken care of, stored inside and ridden once =(
Has a couple of surface scuffs from being transported upright on the one ride, however
quite minute. Here's the link:
[ur ... Read More »