Submitted by
Froglipp
a Weekend Warrior
from Maryland
Date Reviewed: August 19, 2009
Strengths: My first MTB. Have had it for about 4-5 years and I think, for the price, you can't ask for more. I do ride this bike over obstacles, off of ramps, thru mud, up hills, rock gardens, quick downhill, etc. I have raced with it and have even rode it (with 26" slicks) fully loaded on a 200 mile bike tour and it performs admirably. But since it is my first MTB I probably don't know any better.
Weaknesses: The seat was uncomfortable and was replaced, to be expected. The IRC tires were crappy and I had several flats until I switched to Panaracer XC FirePro. Replaced the stock, very creaky pedals with clipless Shimanos.
Bottom Line:
Good bike that will give the beginning MTBR many years of fun. Bums me out that Cannondale is making a lot of their bikes overseas now but I guess they have to be competitive. If given the option I would buy this bike again.
Bike Setup: Stock aside from the seat, tires, and pedals. Might consider a different seatpost. Since it is disc brake ready I thought I might go that direction and switch over but can't justify the expense when the rim brakes work just fine.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
frank191
a Weekend Warrior
from Atlanta, GA
Date Reviewed: February 22, 2009
Strengths: Great bike for a beginner, with plenty of potential as you get better since the frame is so good.
Weaknesses: Tires, forks, shifters.
Bottom Line:
Great bike, you just are going to need to spend about 500 bucks on it to reach the true potential.
Bike Setup: WTB tires. Sette seat. Other upgrades planned soon.(especially forks)
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Henry Gabriel
a Cross Country Rider
from New York
Date Reviewed: June 16, 2007
Strengths: For the price, an excellent all around "mountain bike", great frame, made in the USA!
Weaknesses: After about a year of weekend rding and general transportation, the components started to strain, paint on the handlebars can chip and scratch. Came with elementary Manitou fork.
Bottom Line:
Despite some cheap components, this is an excellent trail bike for a teenager getting into the sport or a weekend warrior. This bike comes from a great company and is one the best values on the market today.
Similar Products Used: Cannondale F4, Santa Cruz Chamellion.
Bike Setup: Stock parts- Manitou Six, Shimano, Trueactiv.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Brent Pierce
a Weekend Warrior
from Carrollton GA USA
Date Reviewed: January 1, 2007
Strengths: Nice frame. I doubt there is much diference between it and the f400 other than components. Rims have been put through hell and still true. Bottom bracket and crank seems like little need to upgrade until it breaks and after one year its still running strong. Stem is atleast not a brick.
Weaknesses: Lol ok here we go. Keep in mind you get what you paid for. Some of my buddies spent 4-5k on their bikes and when you ride a racer-x for a weekend, you start getting really picky about whats wrong with your bike. To start the fork is the worst idea cannondale ever put on a bike. The fork was so bad that I am not even sure if I'll buy cannondale again. It felt alot like riding on an air-mattres and the rebound adjustment was useless. I've seen huffies at walmart with better forks. Keep in mind this was my firt suspension MTB so I had to ride for a while to figure this out.
The breaks are tolerable but I got the XTR v-breaks and that made a world of diference.
The shifters are bass backwards which means if switch bike with someone expect to have to have to relearn how to shift again. I got some Shram x7's on the way to fix that.
bottom bracket is low. About an inch lower than your average hard riding XC frame. Why? I can't figure out because its suppose to be a mountain bike. I chose a fox 100mm to compensate for that. My stock seat was a bit hard on the bumn so I switched that as well for the 84% penile bload-flow seat. My boys have never been happier.
Bottom Line:
So the parts now cost more than the bike; however, now it rides alot better. The Frame is by far its best quality and thats a good thing. Parts can be up-graded as you go but there is not much you can do if a bike has a crappy frame to start. I'm sure I'll have a new frame in 6 months but that is because I have the MTB fever.
Bike Setup: Avid Ti, XTR v-breaks, Fox 100, shram x7
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Jim Russo
a Cross Country Rider
from Saint James, NY, U S A
Date Reviewed: December 11, 2006
Strengths: cannondale furio x frame--very light, very stiff.
Weaknesses: total bike weight a little on the heavy side (30lbs), but 5.5 of that is the manitou fs fork--which doesn't perform well in cold wx (<35 degrees.)
Bottom Line:
this frame is a keeper and is the same frame used on the high end hard tails in the cannondale line up.
great entry-medium level bike that can be upgraded as you wish to rival near high end cannondales.
Bike Setup: manitou elite fs fork, combo sram shimano drivetrain shifts well enough. cannondale v-brakes could be better. wheels quick to come out of true but that's after a few hard rides.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Charles
a Cross Country Rider
from Darien
Date Reviewed: October 15, 2006
Strengths: Light frame, very versital geometry
Weaknesses: No disk brake mounts in the rear, Terrible stock components
Bottom Line:
Its an ok bike for any very casual rider but this bike can not handle any even slightly above ordianry trail conditions without having to replace some component on the bike.
Similar Products Used: jamis komodo, gary fisher big sur
Bike Setup: Manitou Black, Avid front disk brake, race face prodogy cranks, race face bb, sun ryno lite rims, deore/lx shifters, panaracer xc treads.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Bryan Grosinski
from Hopatcong, NJ USA
Date Reviewed: October 9, 2006
Strengths: The Frame is very light and very upgradable, the forks seem to be holding in pretty well, and most of the components.
Weaknesses: Both of my Sram X4 Triggers broke. One was broken when I bought the bike and the other 4 months later. Very weak tires.
Bottom Line:
For the money I couldn't have asked for a better bike. I ride this bike 3 to 4 days a week and love it. I have taken it to the local Free Ride Park three times and the only damage was a flat tire. If you are looking for an entry level bike that will last you a long time then this is the bike for you.
Similar Products Used: Specialized Rockhopper, Trek 4900, Gary Fischer Pirhana, and Haro V4.
Bike Setup: 2006 Cannondale F300 Changed out tires to WTB Velociraptors. Crank Bros. Mallet C's.
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Chip
a Cross Country Rider
from Rota, Spain
Date Reviewed: September 12, 2006
Strengths: Frame size, dimensions. Ease of upgrades if needed.
Weaknesses: Nothing to serious so far. Binders could be a little more manly... (brakes)
Bottom Line:
My reward for quitting smoking... Been riding for past 30 years in one form or another. Great all around, do anything bike. I'm 6'6" and 240 lbs and the bike fits me great. (Post is just barely past minimum mark ;-) Have given it a regular beating every weekend and several days during the week with nothing more than general maintainance required. When something eventually breaks (still waiting), will upgrade accordingly. Withstands navigational errors (crashes) much better than I do.. Great frame, great feel and fantastic fun...
Similar Products Used: Several rebadged treks and giants (I live in Spain and apparently this is legal here...)
Bike Setup: Stock w/ exception of bar ends and new insoles (tubes)...
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Bruce Chee
a Cross Country Rider
from Ft Lauderdale, FL,USA
Date Reviewed: July 23, 2006
Strengths: Most definately impresed with frame and wheels. For a entry level bike the geometry of this bike is very good.
Weaknesses: Components are cheap, but what one would expect for the price, It's the frame you really pay for.
Bottom Line:
After getting back to off road riding after a 10yr break, i desided to start of with the entry level F300,(Budget played a big part aswell, I'm married now), Wrong bike for me, I'm a heavy set guy at 230lbs and i ride quite hard putting a lot of stress on the bike and components. After the second week on an incline at Markam park,i bent the middle chain ring in a big way, just from sheer torque.Guess the Truvativ isoflow didn't cut the mustard. I've since replaced it with the Shimano LX Hollow Tech and i consider it a huge upgrade, so far so good. I've had a few nasty spills, which i consider just a learning curve causing components such as break and shifting levers, pedals, cables, to be replaced and as they break i always upgrade to something stronger. Bottom line, this bike is great for the money and for some one who wants to stay with the novice tracks and dosn't get crazy with this bike, as for me i will just keep on upgrading,knowing full well that i should have just saved those pennies a little longer and aimed for a bike between the $1000-$2000 range, after all,you only get what you pay for.
Similar Products Used: Specialized rockhopper, Giant
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
PAUL
a Cross Country Rider
from CHICAGO
Date Reviewed: July 18, 2006
Strengths: GREAT BIKE OUT OF THE BOX.
Weaknesses: REPLACED THE FORK AS IT WAS WARPED, SAME REPLACEMENT WORKS GREAT
Bottom Line:
THIS IS A GREAT BIKE... BEING FROM ENGLAND, I ALWAYS HEARD OF THE GREAT BUILD QUALITY OF THE CANNONDALE FRAME...PURCHASING THE F300 (2005) DID NOT DISAPPOINT.. AND IT WAS ONLY 500 OF YOUR BUCKS... THESE RETAIL FOR 400-500 POUNDS IN THE UK (APPROX 750USD), YOU CHAPS GET REAL VALUE FOR MONEY...
i RIDE THIS BIKE EVERY OTHER DAY ALONG THE LAKE PATH.. APPROX 20 MILE ROUND TRIP AND RIDE IT HARD ON TRAILS AT WEEKENDS... I HAVE PUT THIS LITTLE MEAN MACHINE THROUGH ITS PACES AND ITS STILL IN GREAT SHAPE...
COMPONENTS DO THE JOB...... DON'T BE WOOED INTO THE INFERIOR FRAME COMPETITORS WITH HIGHER END COMPONENTS.. THE F300 IS FANTASTIC AND WILL BE MY RIDDING BUDDY FOR MANY MORE YEARS TO COME..
Submitted by
Tim
a Weekend Warrior
from Calgary, AB, Canada
Date Reviewed: June 12, 2006
Strengths: Frame.
Weaknesses: Cheap components (see my detail review).
Bottom Line:
I bought this bike in May 2006, after tested riding it against a 2005 Specialized RockHopper, 2006 Norco Bush pilot, Jamis and a Kona. It gave me the best feeling, not sure what made it so special but it felt the best for all the bikes I tested drove. After taking the bike home, I had a chain suck on the first night I rode it. I unjammed the chain, had another chain suck 2 days later. Brought it back to the LBS,they 'unbent' the 2nd chain gear and adjusted the shifter. Chain suck again on the same night. LBS exchanged another F300, rode it again couple times - chain suck again, the 2nd gear was bent so bad that the bike could not be rode, chain suck would occur 100%. Brought it back to the dealer, they changed the 2nd chain gear with a Superpro DH, haven't had a chain suck since (finger crossed). My conclusion, Cannondale put substandard parts on the F300 that could not stand up to even normal use. I understood F300 was Cannondale's entry mountain bike, but it costed $699CDN nonetheless, I expected it to come with parts that was not Walmart quality. Additional information, the chain suck occurred on city streets and bike path and NOT on a mountain trail. The bike had under 20km when all these happened. To be fair, the bike was great after the 2nd chain ring was replaced, it felt great, that was why I bought it in the first place. But given all the trouble I went through to get it going, not sure I want to recommend it to anyone I know. On the up side, Bow Cycle had great customer services, their staffs helped me to get rid of this problem. Kudos to Calgary Bow Cycle.
Similar Products Used: Test drove a 2005 Rockhopper, Norco Bush Pilot, Jamis, Kona
Bike Setup: Stock
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Jeff
a Weekend Warrior
from Traverse City, MI
Date Reviewed: May 19, 2006
Strengths: Frame, ride quality, made in U.S.A.
Weaknesses: Several bikes in this price range had higher level components.
Bottom Line:
I was looking for a trail worthy mountain bike in the $500 price range. The last mountain bike I owned was a 1993 Bridgestone MB-5 and the last time I'd done much trail riding was 1996. All of the bikes I test rode were far superior to anything I'd ridden in the past. So that was my first impression, that whatever bike I chose was going to be an improvement over my old ride. The Cannondale was the first bike I test rode and, despite the slightly higher level of componentry on a few of the other bikes, its ride won me over. It fit me the best and gave me the greatest feeling of control and confidence. Having been riding it on the trails for a month now I'm very happy with my decision. I continue to be very pleased with the way it rides. In this price range, honestly, you're just buying a bike to get out and ride. I doubt you could go wrong with any of the models I test rode, but I would highly recommend the Cannondale. If you want the highest level of componentry for your money it may not be the bike for you. But if you're looking for the best ride, highest quality frame, and value a product made in the U.S.A. this is the bike for you. I love the way it rides and figured it was a better value to buy that and have the option to upgrade components in the future than to put my money into higher grade components on a frame that, to me, didn't ride as well.
Similar Products Used: Test rode the G.F. Marlin, GT Avalanche 2.0, Raleigh M80, Specialized Rockhopper, and the Trek 4500.
Bike Setup: Stock
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Niles
a Weekend Warrior
from Baltimore, MD, USA
Date Reviewed: May 3, 2006
Bottom Line:
Update on my review below:
I took the bike back to REI, where of course the problem refused to manifest itself. Since then I've been out twice, to Avalon and Loch Raven, and it's performed admirably through everything I've thrown at it; even a couple of pretty spectacular wipeouts didn't faze it. This is a great bike for someone at my level; a.k.a. an enthusiastic newbie that wants a bike they can grow on.
I rode the F300 for one day up and down muddy hills at Patapsco Valley park. The front brakes started making rubbing noises, un-activated, before we even got onto the trail. The bike was light enough to climb easily, and it handled the downhill twisties fairly nimbly. The drivetrain shifted consistently and reliably even when loaded, for about half the day. Halfway through hour 4 of our ride, the rear derailleur began periodically refusing to upshift. Better to be stuck in a low gear than in a high one I guess, but I'm taking the bike back to REI tomorrow for a tune-up. Hopefully it's just a problem with the out-of-the-box adjustments on both the brake and the derailleur. I'll add an update later.
Bike Setup: added shimano clipless pedals to stock setup
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Adam
a Cross Country Rider
from Clarksville, TN
Date Reviewed: March 20, 2006
Strengths: Frame, OK components for the price.
Weaknesses: The fork pretty well sucks and the shifter/brake levers are kinda crapy and awkward. the frame and fork are set up for disk brakes but not the hubs.
Bottom Line:
For the money this bike is a good buy. Just buy it and upgrade as you wear things out. One thing that really disapointed me was the fact that the frame and fork were disk compatable the hubs are not. so if you are wanting to use disk brakes in the future you will be buying new wheels as well. Before turning the bike to a single speed i upgraded most of the major componets, brakes, fork, pedals, rear deraillur, rear cassette, chain rings. if i were to the keep the bike like normal i would have replaced the shifter/brake levers, and made it an 9 speed.
Favorite Trail: Montgomery Bell State Park, Green/Yellow
Duration Product Used: 1 Year
Price Paid:
$550.00
Similar Products Used: Cannondale Jekyll
Bike Setup: Single speed set up. Shimano Clipless pedals, Avid single digit 7 brakes, avid brake levers, Minatou Axel adjustable fork and a few other odds and ends.