|
|
|
| |
Submitted by
Eeny Bear
a Weekend Warrior
from Victoria BC
Date Reviewed: July 6, 2006 | | Favorite Trail: | anything with a bit o' challenge | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Purchased At: | factory in 1998 | | Strengths: | Great overall geometry, feels solid and stable in the steeps andd cclimbs as well as any freeride bike can be expected to. | | Weaknesses: | none really | | Similar Products Used: | I've lost count | | Bike Setup: | see earlier review from 1998 (8 years ago)- ignore wild unbridled enthusiasm as I've calmed down since then :) | | Bottom Line: | Will anyone actually read this review? Bought in 1998. I still ride it often. Love it. I'm more of a roadie during the week now but was out again last weekend on the trails embarrassing myself on teeny little logs and stuff. One of the best freeride MTBs I've ridden. Solid and totally dependable. I have been using a Fox Float air shock lately (the RCR was crap - now they're called Romic, and I wonder if they're any better). Just bought a NOS Fox Vanilla RC shock and will try it out next weekend. 3 for value - even though I got a bit of a deal it's just a bike. In 1998 US$2000 was a lot of dough (retail) for a frame. Howevver, becuase it still rides like new after a gazillion miles I'llgive it 5 for value. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Gregg Howard
a Cross Country Rider
from Laguna Niguel
Date Reviewed: February 21, 2005 | | Favorite Trail: | Camp Nelson | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$1800.00 | | Purchased At: | From Darrin | | Strengths: | Great looks with the red paint job. Rides like a Cadilac. Extremely plush. Heavy by today's standards but very comfortable on the trail | | Weaknesses: | Seat tube creak. Even had it repaired, but developed another small creak. Very poor design for holding the seat post. | | Bike Setup: | Blur, all XTR | | Bottom Line: | I replaced the Chuck several years ago with a Santa Cruz Blur. Much lighter and more responsive. But, recently decided to rebuild the Chuck with a 5" Fox fork and make it a free ride bike. It's like riding in a Cadilac...not particularly quick or responsive but oh so comfortable. I could add a pro-peddal valve to the rear Fox shock if I really wanted to reduce the bob while climbing. With 2.5 Weirwolf on front, it's really a fun bike to ride... makes me appreciate the climbing ability of the Blur... and always great to look at! Too bad the company doesn't exist anymore as it was a benchmark bike in its day and still turns heads. | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
RON S.
a Cross Country Rider
from SALT LAKE
Date Reviewed: August 26, 2004 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$700.00 | | Strengths: | NONE | | Weaknesses: | MANY BUT FOR STARTERS TERRIBLE DESIGN CREAKS CONSTANTLY!! SMALL CRACK IN WELDS AND IM NOT ABUSIVE. UNABLE TO REPLACE NO LONGER IN BUISNESS PAINT JOB WEAK AND PRONE TO STONE CHIPS.......RIDES LIKE A HARDTAIL | | Bike Setup: | ALL UPGRADED | | Bottom Line: | WOULD NOT PURCHASE ANOTHER ONE. AT THE TIME WAS DIFFERENT AND MADE IN THE U.S. BUT WAS NEVER R&D ENOUGH TO AND SHOULD HAVE NEVER RELEASED TO PRODUCTION AND BELIEVE THATS THE REASON THEY NO LONGER EXSIST. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
michael posluszny
a Weekend Warrior
from san francisco
Date Reviewed: April 3, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | Golden Gate Bridge | | Duration Product Used: | 2 Years | | Strengths: | Good design nice looking handles well | | Weaknesses: | First Daron is saleing Chuck.And is going to sale RCR shocks full out.Which I had to return my first one because of hissing sound.Very poor service from them at least they replaced it but took many phone calls to get the part sent. Had the bike over 1 year and 1/2.Had to frame replaced for because seat post tube broke loose.They only 2 welds to hold it in place I was told.I now need the rear piece that holds the brakes and Rear derailer replaced because of a crack.I have called daren 6 times over 2 months to get my part he does not return my calls.But when he wanted to sale it to me he diffenitly called me back.The bike is very hard to keep clean and waxed to many groves and crannies.When 2nd frame sent to me was missing parts.I still havn't got you would think when you pay $2000 for a frame they would have better quality control. The first frame had bumps in the paint job.This was also verified from the bike dealer.They said they they had a problem with the frames paint jobs.All the ones I looked at were full of these bumbs.I have had a creaking noise on both frames which I am not sure of but I think is from the seat post moving.Daren said to replace it with a longer saet post which I did it helped a little but still have noise when I am sitting on seat with wieght more towards the front and torqueing hard.Daren said that I could ship the bike to him and he would look at it.But when they replaced my frame it took over a month to get my bike back.And I am sure this would not have my bike for 2 months.There is a life time gaurantee on chuck frames which is good but if it is not in bussiness any longer or the new owner does not honor the gaurantee you are screwed.I like the frame bot afraid I am going to end up with a bike that breaks alot and no one to fix it unless I pay huge bucks at this point I wish I would have bought from a company like intense or anybody who might be in bussineess tomorrow>this was supose to be my dream bike but has become a big disapointment because of the frame It looks good and handles well.I got complements on it all the time when they do I tell them all the problems I have had with the frame and service i Also tell them the good but when I spent 2000 on aframe I expected Rolls Royce quality not Gm during the 70s.It was a good idea but not the expertise of a large company. | | Similar Products Used: | See other reveiws this section | | Bike Setup: | See other reviews this section | | Bottom Line: | I can't say if I would do it again because in all fairness I like the look and the way it handles.But the quality is a joke.I have been biking for over 36 years and have many frames and bikes did not have problems with fromes breaking except on one which I was a bike messenger on for 4 years caring up 50 pounds extra wieight mant times I had the frame for over 6 years before it cracked by going of a curb.It did not have any suspension it was a road bike.I have not had noise problems that I could not fix or figure out like the Chuck CRFS and people we are paying $2000 for this the bike I had for years a a bike messenger I paid $400 total this bike cost me $5000 to $ 6000 was suppose to be a dream and is a big disapointment.And it may get worse as time goes on with no company behind it.Very disapointed in San francisco | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Phil
a Downhiller
from Fort Collins, CO
Date Reviewed: October 24, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Tsali (GA) | | Duration Product Used: |
tested or demo'ed only | | Strengths: |
Killer design, plush ride, fast descender, big air friendly, custom frame sizes at no extra charge | | Weaknesses: |
Non...design wise... | | Similar Products Used: |
All FS frames... | | Bike Setup: |
Marzocchi Z1BAM, CaneCreek rims, aheadset and seat, LP Composite bar and post, Azonic stem...XT thruout | | Bottom Line: | This is a sweet bike and I cannot wait to own one.. .I ordered a frame Four months ago and have yet to receive it and every week they tell me... oh, it'll be out the end of the week... promise... bull... I have no bike after a more than resonable time...that is what happens I guess when a bunch of stoner moutaninbikers try to start a company... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Leigh Prall
a Cross-Country Rider
from Dennis Ma
Date Reviewed: October 11, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
fast singletrack | | Duration Product Used: |
6 months | | Strengths: |
killer linkage, wonderful welds,strong headtube | | Weaknesses: |
paint | | Similar Products Used: |
work at a shop so i,ve demo'd everything | | Bike Setup: |
xtr, chris king, tompson, kore, the good old 217's, zuke z-1 | | Bottom Line: | This bike kicks, uphill and downhill. Bike loves big air. You live once, why noy ride the frame you only read about. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jae
a Weekend Warrior
from Alexandria, Va
Date Reviewed: September 28, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
potapsco | | Duration Product Used: |
1 Year | | Strengths: |
monicoque frame Rigidity
plush rear suspension (high leverage)
Horst link rear linkage design
vibrant paint color | | Weaknesses: |
fragile paint finish | | Similar Products Used: |
99Specialized FSR Elite | | Bike Setup: |
Manitou Xvert-R, full XTR set, Hayes hydrolic brakes. WTB saddle. Kore, King | | Bottom Line: | All around single track bike that loves to fly downhill at any given chance.Pedaling up long fireroads is not its favorite thing. However it handles short technical climbs well. The Horst link suspension does not interrupt pedaling over obstacles in any gear. But it does compress the susepension under pedaling. Upgrading to T2 helps to manage the rear end over choppy breaking bumps but doesn't improve the fireroad climbing significantly. It probably has to do with T2's inability to immobilize the suspension like Fox units. The pivots have been maintanence free so far. The bottom line is it's a great mountain bike. It is the bike of the choice for me over the hardtail I have even if it means that I would be lagging behind fireroad races. Well.... The lack of future support concernes me at this time.... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Vaughn Smith
a Weekend Warrior
from Denver
Date Reviewed: September 21, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
South Fork | | Duration Product Used: |
6 months | | Bottom Line: | Still a marvelous machine. Have upgraded to the T2 on the rearend, which has really made the Chuck a more versatile bike. It now dampens with both rebound and compression to quiet down those fireroad climbs. Hard, out of saddle efforts are noticeably improved. I now have the sensation that I am moving forward as opposed to up and down. In my eyes, this change in ride characteristic moves the bike from a descending champ only into just a great all around trail bike. Like any FS bike, it takes a bit more maintenance, which I enjoy anyway down in my little cave. I've taken the swingarm apart once. Most of the bearings were worn into a limited travel range after about 4 months of riding. I opened and greased 'em all, then switched them to different sites. One of the things that drove me toward this bike was the bearing pivots. Well, maybe this is not the correct application for bearings. Titus and Ellsworth arguments for bushing pivots seems slightly more valid at this point. This does not lessen my happiness with the Chuck, it's just something to deal with.Finally, I am worried about the fact that Darren Murphy and his Chuck enterprise has disappeared. I hear that he will be getting re-geared at a new SoCal locale and coming out with several new bike designs. Definitely good news, but it seems way to often a good effort like his just goes under when it hits a major bump. No matter how good my $2000 frame investment, I would not have even considered purchasing a Chuck if I knew his company was going to go under within a few short months. Nothing is bulletproof, no Full Suspension bike is a ride and forget it thing. Product support is a big deal. If I don't get that in return for my investment in any product, not just this bike, then kiss product loyalty goodbye. I'll be down the road and wiser for it.I sincerely hope for Darren that Chuck will go on producing great bikes. If he does, then I would support him and lean toward a CRFSXC for my wife...and again I'd be lobbying friends to consider this beauty. If not, then I won't waste my breathe telling other potential buyers how great it is.Still a great, great bike. Despite the rant, a 5 star ride. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
vaughn smith
a Weekend Warrior
from denver, co
Date Reviewed: July 17, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
South Fork, Miltonfreewater Oregon | | Duration Product Used: |
3 months | | Strengths: |
Fabulous handling in singletrack. I can climb technical sections again with the forgiving and gripping rearend. Great rear suspension with the RCR T-1, soon to be T-2. Guaranteed traction when braking in stutter bumps. Unique, sleek. | | Weaknesses: |
Not a gazelle on the climbs, but also not a pig. 28lbs +/-. Must be disciplined to just spin the legs or it will pogo. Prolonged out of saddle efforts on climbs is often an exercise in wasted motion. Red paint is easy to chip. The monocque frame does slightly accentuate trail noise, although nothing like the Trek Y's or even megatube cannondales. | | Similar Products Used: |
Boulder Starship X 3 years, Trek Y33, and Ellsworth Truth. | | Bike Setup: |
I'm 5'10, 185lbs. Short legs, long torso.
Red Medium CRFS with an RCR T-1 rear shock. A 700lb spring was way too light, the current 800lber is perfect.
White Bros SC90 on the front with medium springs and standard cartridge. The rest is a race face riser bar, Syncros stem, seatpost, and XTR controls and drivetrain | | Bottom Line: | Almost 4 months out, this bike would still be my first choice. I'm out every weekend (or more) looking for that holy grail of singeltrack, and this bike excels in that area. The cockpit is perfectly stretched with a 120mm 5 degree stem. So I can ride all day without getting a sore back. My arms aren't wandering all over looking for a comfortable place to rest on long climbs. The walking beam linkage is quite supple. Seated climbs in rough terrain are a breeze, but you can see the swingarm continually activated on smooth fireroad and pavement. Tightening up the spring and the dampening help minimize this somewhat.A couple weeks ago I got to ride a Boulder starship and this one side by side on the Bunker Creek Trail in Brian Head. The Boulder with it's monostay low pivot rear swingarm was still the best for aggressive uphill efforts. The semi stichtiony rear Risse Air/Oil was a sharp contrast to the Walking beam horst linkage on the Chuck. The Chuck will ride like a cadillac up anything, it just won't get there in a big hurry. I didn't feel like racing anybody up the hills. Downhills are another story, which just makes me gush. In singletrack it is very agile. With the supple suspension, I have the luxury of blowing through rocks, logs,... my two dogs, even if I shouldn't. Downhill it just blows the beautiful, but fragile, Boulder away. The rearend is so active with that T-1 it gives continual traction feedback. It will not lockup and slip and slide like the Boulder did. I can go into hard corners much hotter with still more control now. A nice feeling. The front end is decent. The White Bros doesn't match the rearend for suppleness, which is probably a blessing since it doesn't bob at slow speeds. The Z1 which I'm considering for much later, would probably make me much happier downhill, but would really crimp on the climbs. I backed out the dampening almost all the way. The 90mm is adequate travel. The flexion is minimal. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
michael
a Weekend Warrior
from San Francisco Ca.
Date Reviewed: June 1, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Golden Gate Bridge | | Duration Product Used: |
6 months | | Strengths: |
Update to5/28/99 Chuck replaced my frame with a new one.They modified the frame so that the front cable guides do not hit the triple clamp fork however it still hits the frame. But I am not sure this would not happen on other frames.The new shock looks like a better shock.At least all the bike magazines are talking about it and it a cool red.Its an RCR scock. The paint job is better than last in that I have seen any little bumps. | | Weaknesses: |
See 5/28/99 Have noise sounds like coming from rear schock assembly put white grease on it.Had similar on last frame fixed it but had to return frame before long range testing. | | Similar Products Used: |
ee 5/28/99 | | Bike Setup: |
Manitou X-vert Triple clamp | | Bottom Line: | See 9/12/98 & 5/28/99 I think it is a frame good all tough expensive. Like most new prodoucts they are still working out bugs.Daren Murphy I think trys to give good service and product.Even though they made me wait 2 weeks and I didn't know I was getting a new frame until I picked up my bike even though I talk to Bernie hours before shipping.But at least he sent it Overnight delivery | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris
a Weekend Warrior
from Edmonton, AB, Canada
Date Reviewed: May 28, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Root Down, Roller Coaster, Endor Village 2000, 7 words, and 400 bucks | | Duration Product Used: |
3 months | | Strengths: |
An incredibly beautiful frame, immaculate welds that make the monocoqque frame all that more nice. The setup is extremely plush. Its sealed cartridge bearings are maintenance free and incredibly smooth. Removal of the shock really showed how nice the frames suspension is as the tolerances are so fine that I have never yet encountered another FS bike with as nice a suspension setup. It also has a reasonable weight, only 6.5lbs, and given the inherent strength of the frame is and excellent weight. I can not stress how beautiful the craftsmanship on this frame is. Finally the walking-beam 4-bar linkage rear suspension is excellent. I have noticed very little if no bobing while climbing, and yes, you can climb with a Chuck CR FS, it is extremely plush on the downhill and given its geometry is right at home on the tight signletrack. | | Weaknesses: |
The paint is scratched or scuffed to easily. | | Similar Products Used: |
Santa Cruz Heckler, Specialized FSR, GT STS 1, Kona Stab DeeLux, Rocky Mountain Pipeline | | Bike Setup: |
'99 Chuch CR FS frame (blue) w/ Fox Vanilla Rx rear shock
'99 Marzocchi Z1 BAM (polished)
'99 Hope Pro disc brakes
Raceface Air Alloy Riser bar
Raceface SYStem (white)
Yeti Speed Grips (black)
Chris King HS (black)
Raceface XY0 post (black)
Titec Beserkr KTi DH saddle (black)
Raceface Taperlock steel BB w/ RF DH cup
Raceface Turbine LP cranks (white)
Raceface 9-spd. Race rings - 24-34-46 (black)
Shimano M545 pedals (polished)
XT cassette 11-32
XTR 9-spd. RF shifters
XTR E-type F. Derailler
XTR 9-spd. R. Derailler
Rolhoff 99 chain
Hope BULB hubs (black)
Mavic D521 CD rims (grey)
DT Swiss DB spokes w/ brass nipples, 3X pattern
axle/seatpost bolts
Tioga Factory DH 2.3 (F) and WTB Desertraptor 47/54 (R) tires | | Bottom Line: | I originally had my previous bike, a Specialized Stumpjumper Pro HT (with some nice Arch Supreme's and other nifty after-market upgrades), stolen. Fortunately it was fully insured and so I began my quest for a new ride. I decided long ago that my next ride would be a FS bike so began focusing on the usual mass-produced bikes (Specialized, Santa Cruz, Rocky Mountain, etc...). But my friend had found an old BIKE magazine and they had done a review of the Chuck CR-FS frame. I was immediately reminded of when I first saw a picture of the Chuck frame built up for a review in some other magazine. Unfortunately the only thing that kept me from actually considering the bike was its price...$2000US. That is a lot of money and with the Canadian exchange rate it would end up costing in upwards of $3400CAN. Yikes. Nonetheless I couldn't get the idea of owning this frame out of my head.In steps MTBR. While visiting the Techtalk section someone had asked a question about the Chuck CR-FS and one of the responses caught my eye. I e-mailed the poster and suddenly became intriugued. I believe I was asking how the 5 Z1 worked with his Chuck sincer it was designed for use with a 4 travel fork. In his response, which said he liked the set-up, he also mentioned that he might be able to help me get a Chuck frame for a somewhat cheaper price. This began my relationship with the gentleman who ended up being Ian from the StockLogic Group, the Canadian retailler of Chuck frames in Canada. I know this is a review of the frame, but I have to take a moment to give thanks for all the help from Ian at SLG as we played a lot of e-mail tag, half of it before he even knew if I'd commit to a purchase, and he was always very curtieous and helpful. Plus SLG offers their Exchange-Buster prices which for Candians can effectively save you over $500 on your frame. In anyevent, after answering many of my questions and getting a few price quotes I got word from Ian that Darren Murphy, CEO of Chuck Bicycles,had declared effective that day that no Chuck CR-FS frame can be sold for less then the MSP of $2000US. However, since Ian had offered me a much lower price before this annoucement that if I sent $2750CAN (which includes all taxes, shipping, and additional costs) within 2 days they would honour that price quote. Well it took me about an hour to get to the post office because for that price this frame was a bargain. Ian had my Money Order within 24 hours and the wait began.I had requested my frame in blue instead of the usual Ferrari red and in Medium (once again with the help of Ian). I then finally got a chance to talk to Ian when we talked one evening when I was looking for some specs to help me and my LBS order the correct parts (BB spindle length and the low-down on the whole E-type F. Derailleur information). A few weeks later I put the order for the parts in to my LBS. 6 weeks after I placed my order my frame arrived (not too worry potential Chuck owners, my frame took a much longer time to ship because when Darren heard I would be using Hope Disc brakes he pulled my frame of the shippment that was going out and attached a disk brake cable guide on the rear chainstay. Nice! For my wait I got a free Chuck jersey with my frame though). The frame was so beautiful I fondled it for hours. I removed the shock and was floored. The rear linkages moved so smoothly on the sealed cartridge bearings I couldn't believe it. It was soooo shiney and the fact that the entire frame, both the front and rear triangle are monoqque makes all that more unique.Well I took the frame to the shop and it was built a few weeks later once the disc's arrived and the correct Raceface BB and DH cup arrived for use with the E-type front derailleur. The frame looked even more beautiful once built up into a real bike and once I got the brakes set-up and made the proper adjustments (pedal tension, shifters and such...) I took it out on its maiden voyage. PLUSH! Only word that will work. The bike does not bob at all when doing normal riding but it responds to even small bumps on the road. I find I can climb better on my Chuck then on my old HT, which is likely due to the increase traction you can get with a FS bike. It is great for bombing down the odd downhill and just feels so satble and sturdy. I could feel the bikes craftsmanship in the ride.The nice things I noticed on the trail; the geometry, even with a 5 travel fork, is ideal for tight singletrack riding as tight, sharp turning is a breeze with this frame. The rear suspension just plain works. It never makes a sound as it just does its thing and sucks up evey root and drop-off I throw at it. Finally, when in doubt, do not worry, the Chuck CR-FS will ALWAYS outride you so even in the hairiest of situations just point it in the best direction, get your centre of gravity set and let her go. The frame is excellent, and extremely functional, and the fact that it looks so nice is a beautiful bonus.The bottom line in this post may have been a touch long but it had to be as even my verbosness can not adequately express how complete and udderly satisfied I am with my Chuck CR-FS and in hindsight I would pay $2000US for this frame if I had to do it again because while I got it on sale it is worth every penny for it. This rame and suspension design is so good I can not even consider riding another FS design at the moment. I hope one day everyone will be as happy with their bike as I am. Happy Trails,
Chris | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Michael
a Weekend Warrior
from San Francisco Ca.
Date Reviewed: May 28, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Golden Gate Bridge | | Duration Product Used: |
6 months | | Strengths: |
I have had my chuck sevaral months now see first review 9/12/98. It still Handles very well is light and looks good. | | Weaknesses: |
First weakness is if you use a Triple Clamp fork cant turn handle bars clockwise and counter clockwise as far as you can on most bikes.When you turn them they hit the front cable holders.Which is a problem when you fall and the handle bars turn and push into the frame or cable holder it bends in the frame.It happened to me.Next is the welding of the frame.I had to send my frame back to chuck because the seat post down tube welding broke.I have heard from several sources that this has happened before several times before.Chuck takes 2 weeks to fix plus the time for you or bike shop to strip off all the parts and travel time.So far I have been without my bike for 3 weeks now going on 4. I am not not sure that it will not happen again.This is making me lose faith in the product.You would hope when you spend $2000 for a frame that you would not have these kind of problems.Lastly When Climbing steep hill the rear tire slips easily and when I shift my wieght to compensate It makes me feel uneasy And the bike feels like tire might slip causing me to loose control.Having second thoughts Maybe should have gone with proven frame like Turner Rather then A frame that is still reletively knew and unproven. | | Similar Products Used: |
Trek Turner Intense Gary Fisher | | Bike Setup: |
See review 9/12/98 | | Bottom Line: | Dont know if I would do it again.I like to have a product under me the I wont feel will fall apart I was very carful and gentle with it whats going to happen when I start to punish it?Will it fall apart? On a downhill bike you should not have to worry about the frame falling apart.For $2000 I dont feel I should have to worry about my bike falling apart and causing possible injury and maybe even death.Or having to be without my bike for sevaral weeks.Loosing faith fast! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
RatherBeRiding
a Cross-Country Rider
from Whitby, Ontario
Date Reviewed: May 13, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
less than 1 month | | Strengths: |
Strong! frame
Good sizing for larger riders | | Weaknesses: |
Paint is a bit easy to chip | | Bike Setup: |
Large CR-FS
Stock Vanilla RX with 950 lb. Mountain Speed
Z3 Long travel
XTR Rapid rise rear der
XT front der
XT brakes and levers
Cane Creek C2 headset
Bontrager stem
Easton Monkeybar riser bar
RaceFace XY seatpost
WTB ST Ti saddle
Time ATAC Aliums
Cane Creek WAM's enroute to me now | | Bottom Line: | Have only ridden this a month so far.I bought this frame because my research led me to believe that the 4-bar linkage suspension design (walking beam to be specific) would perform better than most other bikes, and it hasn't let me down. Its a great investment.Thanks to Ian at StockLogic (www.stocklogic.com) for a price that can't be beat, and really superb support after the sale. Ian has bent over backwards to support me while I got this bike assembled, which I did myself from handpicked components. Components from Brett at Kalo - service has also been great.The frame is a work of art, and so far indestructible. I'm at the large end of the scale (6'6 and 240 lbs.) and I consider the frame to be an investment, I think most lesser frames would eventually fail me but I have no doubts about the Chuck. In fact I find the frame so strong that it enables me to transmit so much power to the rear wheel that I've already blown out a cheap, old, heavy pair of wheels doing mostly road riding - thus the Cane Creek's that I currently have on order with Brett. I expect that proper wheels will make a world of difference.The handling is great. It climbs better than my hardtail, the suspension glues to rear wheel to the ground. Short, technical hills where I would get caught up in a hole, I can now just power through. The front end is very responsive, I find I can throw it around the trail laterally when I need to, for instance on a twisting climb or when exiting a tight corner. Good balance of front to rear, keeping the front end down when climbing has not been a problem like it was on my old bike.Descending is, of course, not an issue. Just point and go.The suspension can be a bit of a challenge to get set up right. I currently ride with about 6 turns of preload and 8 turns of rebound damping. I find that it is about right for general trail riding but still too active for me on long climbs, especialy in soft stuff. But I'm pretty sure that my front shock, a Z3 LT with heavy springs and 10 weight oil, is still too soft, and causing the rear end bobbing. I think heavier oil will do the trick, and in addition the new Chucks ship with the RCR-T2 shock with adjustable compression and rebound. All in all its a great frame.I'll give you an update when I get proper wheels and get my suspension set up properly. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dave Macki
a Cross-Country Rider
from Ottawa, Ont
Date Reviewed: April 11, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
North shore (if only I lived there!) | | Duration Product Used: |
3 months | | Strengths: |
- beautiful craftmanship
- excellent design and superb handling | | Weaknesses: |
- none so far though its only been a month of riding | | Similar Products Used: |
- Kona Sex Too
- Kona Stinky
- Trek Y bike
- Rocky Pipeline | | Bike Setup: |
- Z1 with firm springs
- King headset + Raceface stem and riser
- Sun Rhyno lites on Hugi (front) and King (rear)
- Raceface cranks/rings + damage control (no large ring) + '98 9.0 ESP shifting system
- Magura Johnny T's
- Corerat Pads | | Bottom Line: | I have only used this bike for a month now but I thought that I would give my general impressions and then follow up a year from now. Also I have yet to take it on the trails but I know some pretty gnarly city riding places so I think that I got a pretty good feel for the bike.For starters I weigh 185lbs and I am about 5'11'. I use to ride a Kona Sex Too but the suspension characteristics were kinda wierd (especially in high speed G outs) and the bushings were crap. I started to look for a new frame and Brett at Kalo convinced me to go with the Chuck (I am glad he did!)I was thinking of a way of describing how good the bike fees and the only way I could think of is comparing it to when I was growing learning to play guitar. As always I had to start out on a crappy guitar bought at some pawn shop but as I progressed I would step up the guitar hierarchy. Each new twanger would push my playing skills to new limits - fresh feel would give me new ideas and ablitities until you find the ultimate where there is not much else out there that can match the feel or sound. This is basically how I feel about the Chuck. My riding has improved over the short course of a month and the bike feels so natural to ride. It was kinda wierd buying the frame as the I could not test ride it in Canada before I got so I had to take a chance. The dimensions fit me nicely - I do not feel to cramped nor overly extended. The suspension charactersistics are really nice, much smoother and less progressive then the Kona. My one small complaint is the erratic customer service at Chuck. I have sent some emails that go unresponded and then some come back at me within an hour. I have also tried to get a warranty card/owners manual/ rear der hanger sent to me for the last three months and I have yet to receive them, though I was told twice (on the phone) that they would be sent out that day. Don't get me wrong I realize that Darren is basically a one man show and perhaps there were personal problems as he has stated before. When I do talk to him on the phone or through email is very nice and answers all my stupid questions. It just nice to get some consistency in the response to the customer needsAll in all the is an awesome bike - highly recommended to anyone looking for all around FS bike. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Gregg Howard
a Cross-Country Rider
from Laguna Niguel, CA
Date Reviewed: April 6, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Camp Nelson | | Duration Product Used: |
1 Year | | Strengths: |
High quality manufacturing, attentiion to detail & fine workmanship. | | Weaknesses: |
Too much fun factor! | | Similar Products Used: |
You name it, I've ridden it! | | Bottom Line: | I wanted to post a one year review. The bike continues to be everything I expected in an expensive high quality bike. The maintenance has been minimal and the reliability exceptional. I know that Darren continues to improve the design, but this bike is like a fine wine, it just keeps improving over time. My 57 year bones thank God that someone designed and built a bike that allows an :old amn to cointinue to enjoy one of his favorite passtimes... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jae Chi
a weekend warrior
from Alexandria, VA
Date Reviewed: February 12, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
I ordered mine through Bret at Kalo Mtn Cycle. Thanks Bret!! He put up with me hand picking every little detail of the bike and changing my mind, too. I'm 6 ft tall and 190LB and some more on certain days. I chose medium after talking to Darren at Chuck few times and fearing for my longevity. Check out the stand over height! I have short legs and long torso. The medium came with an uninterrupted top tube which I like a lot. The wheel base is still longer than my 18 Specialized M2. This helps greatly on those speedy fire road descends. The fit of the frame is classic X-country racer fit. The frame being designed around 4 fork, I chose 99' Xvert-R with 115mm travel over Z1 - I didn't want to slow down the frame's steering ability with Z1's slacker offset. I also wanted to hit those roots with full speed - I broke the Palmer Stroker's outer leg with unwillingness to slow down through rooted trails. The rest of parts are XTR 9 speed drive train(12-38 cogset for lugging the weight up hills), Hayes hydrolic disc brake with Hugi/Hayes hubs(heavy), Sun Ringle DS-1 XC rims, DT spokes, WTB TyrannoRator tires, Raceface riserbar, King headset, Kore stem (120mm, 15) and skewers, WTB SST-Ti saddle, Shimano 636 pedals. All of that add up to hefty 32LBs on my bathroom scale. That is a little more than I was hoping for. I guess I could have selected lighter fork, hubs and brakes. But I wanted a fun bike, one that I could ride anywhere and have fun. The frame is stiff. The rear suspension is plush, soft, and responsive. This is not a X-country racing dual bike. It doesn't take the edges off the hits. It soaks it up. Darren got the length of the rocker arm and the relative angle perfectly. The longer arm give a great leverage to respond for small bumps and the position allows it to take up the big hits - as the suspension gets compressed, the force leveraging on the sock it reduced. I run the rear with 800 LB/inch spring and 6 turns out from MAX rebound with almost no preload. Pedaling induced suspension movement is minimal. Braking doesn't seem to affect the rear suspension except for the standard fork dive unloading the rear. The 70.5 degree head tube angle give additional stability at 35+ mph fire road descends. Two wheel drifts are easier with this bike than with my M2. This bike allows me to ride on those rooted and rocky trails at Fountain Head, Va at full speed, pedaling! I couldn't take the pounding with my M2 with suspension seat post before. The pivot are maintenance freeeeee! My first ride was in Virginia winter rain for little over an hour at Great Falls - I just couldn't pedal enough going from the kitchen to the livingroom. After a month and a half later, there is no squeak, absolutely silent smooth movement. And yes! The frame! It's beautiful as all the other reviews described it. I would see more of that firely Ferrari red paint job if I get some dirt of the bike. :-) Happy trails!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bob
a weekend warrior
from Aliso Viejo, Ca
Date Reviewed: January 28, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
Received my new Chuck FS earlier this month. So far I have about 4 rides (total miles approx. 45-55) on it and have been feeling it out and getting used to the bike and ride. The components (as delivered) are: Marz z.1 bam, Race Face Cranks and rings, Mavic Cer. 517 w/ WTB Enduroraptors, 99' XT drivetrain and brakes, Titec Hell Bent 1.5. The bike performs...It goes up well(not quick and you need to be smooth) , and goes down great (point and go) The frame is top-quality and a pleasure to look at. Stiff frame and swingarm and plush ride (still working out the fork and shock set up). Overall a great singletrack and trailriding bike/frame. I am going to have a bunch a fun on this one... Coming from an older LTS-2 it is a big step up. Be aware of the Race Face rings working with the 99' 9-speed. I'm still having set up problems and may switch to Shimano rings if I cannot work it out...The frame however is (so far) perfect. Thanks go out to Brett @ Kalo Mountain Cycles for working with me and selling me a great frame at a great price (all delivered as promised - say hi to the kid and wife!),to Darren @ Chuck for making a great product and being available, and last to my LBS (Jeff and Will @ Bike Tech in Laguna Hills) for their great service and putting up with my searching... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
otismojo
a cross-country rider
from Indianapolis
Date Reviewed: December 18, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Long term update on the Chuck CR-FS. It simply is an amazing bike to ride and to look at. It performs better than it looks (one beautiful bike!). The frame has held up to the vigors of riding for 6 months without a bit of service or problem. Outstanding quality. I have the bike equiped with a White Bros sc90 fork and full XTR and weights around 25lbs without any light weight stuff. I did have cane creek specially machine an AD10 for the rear suspension which took off about 0.65lbs and made the frame one hell of a XC machine. With the vanilla RX coil it also serves as a down hiller's dream. The bike is a perfect mix of personalities combining cross country aspects with downhill comfort. I would not trade my Chuck for anything. Service is first rate and Darren is back in business after some downtime. He personally answers every call and makes a huge effort to take care of any concerns regarding the frame or the setup. Never a question regarding dedication to his product. Few in this business have the ability or desire to service and standup to what they believe in like Darren Murphy and Chuck bicycles. Hats off to everyone involved in the process of making this bike a reality. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Gregg Howard
a cross-country rider
from Laguna Niguel, CA
Date Reviewed: December 18, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
This is a follow-up review to the one I did back in June of this year. I've now had the bike for over 6 months and been able to ride it hard in almost every type of senario on some of the best trails that our fair state of California has to offer. As you can read from the reviews below, the bike rides like a dream and seems to disappear under you whether riding cross country or extreme downhill, the bike flat out performs! It is without a doubt the best bike I've ridden to date. I was interested to see how the bike would hold up under heavy riding. The only service I've had to do was to clean out the sealed bearings on the bottom pivot. In experimenting with the rear suspension, I've changed out the #600 coil to a #450 Mountain Speed and rode the San Juan Trail (13 mles of fun downhill riding). I did slow the dampening a tad. I couldn't believe how plush the rear end became without bottoming out. ( I weigh 150 lbs ) Several other who were riding Uzzis tried the soft set-up and couldn't believe how much it felt like a down-hill specific bike. I'm going to try the #500 and #550 springs just for the hell of it. The point being is that you can ride a softer spring than other designs without suffering the pogo effect. I also highly recommend the RCR cartridge for the Marzoke's Z1. Anyone out there considering a new steed, you owe it to yourself to ride one of these before spending your hard earned $$$ on something else. Maybe it's not for you...but what if it is? | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chuckbicycles
a
from SoCal
Date Reviewed: December 16, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I'm not sure if I'm allowed to post a statement but here it goes. I would like to first apologize to anyone who has had a problem with getting a returned phone call, e-mail, fax, or other. Over the last few weeks I have been out of my office due to a family emergency. I tried to stay on top of things while out of town but unfortunately had a few things slip through the cracks. Again, I apologize and welcome any and all comments or questions from current or potential customers.P.S. I only put a rating because the system wouldn't allow the submission without it.Darren Murphy
President/Owner
CHUCK Bicycles
P 909-337-4604 Fax 909-337-3404
P.O. Box 1725 Lake Arrowhead, CA 92352
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
JOHN
a racer
from CONNECTICUT
Date Reviewed: December 16, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM................Got the right phone # Eddie
unless someone elses voice mail answers as Chuck Bicycles. Since you dont
have a problem reaching them maybe you could tell them to give me a call.
Again........I love the bikes but obviously their customer relations is hit (Eddie)
or miss(me) | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Fast Eddie
a cross-country rider
from SD Cal
Date Reviewed: December 15, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Update to the next post. The site for Chuck is...
http://chuckbicycles.com/If I say 5 again it'll still be a fair average for the posted ratings.
Seven more words needed - now three, one... there got it! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Fast Eddie
a cross-country rider
from SD Cal
Date Reviewed: December 15, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Hmmm...
I just called Chuck and the phone was politely answered on the first ring. I needed info on spring rates for the stock Fox Van. Rx. Perhaps you have the wrong telephone number. As I was researching this purchase I noted that a few of the mag reviews gave a non-existent number or their fax number. Try the number posted here at the Chuck site. Simply the best fs bike I've ridden compared to several otherwise excellent fs bikes. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
JOHN
a racer
from CONNECTICUT
Date Reviewed: December 15, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
HEY FRANCO!!...Don't be so quick to poke holes in Mr. Green's accusations.
I currently own a CHUCK Hardtail and love it so much I was thinking of a Full
Suspension model in addition to my hardtail. I have, to date, called 3 times leaving both my phone # and address with no response.......which unfortunately is what they will receive from me.......No response. 5 flamers for my hardtail. 1 barely burning for service | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Franco
a racer
from British Columbia CANADA
Date Reviewed: December 14, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
So, Mr. R. Green... yours (below) is obviously a fraudulent post. Unlike you, I actually own a CR-FS and am completely satisfied with the prompt service, quick responses and comprehensive information and support.You do not own a Chuck and yet you are pompous enough to rate it with 1 chili. You are a joke. Actually worse than a joke because you have discredited a company without cause. Perhaps you are a frustrated manufacturer of an inferior product. At the very least you are depriving a village somewhere of their idiot. 1. If you had actually called the factory you would have spoken to a charming receptionist who would have mailed you a catalogue as well as directed you to the nearest dealer.2. Having a call returned from any company (especially a tiny one like Chuck) may take a day or two.If you had been raised properly you would be phoning the company right now to apologize to Darren Murphy but I suspect this to be unlikely.As I expected from a quality company and a superior product, the Chuck CR-FS is exceeding every expectation I had for a double boinger. Better for me than my partner's Uzzi SL (also a fine bike) and better than a Turner Burner I test-rode extensively. That's saying something - - if you've ever ridden an SL or a Turner you'll be impressed by my comparison, even if you disagree.I hope you get the bike you deserve, Mr. Green - but it certainly isn't a Chuck CR-FS.5 out of 5 | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
R. Green
a cross-country rider
from Columbus, OH
Date Reviewed: December 14, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Was extremely interested in purchasing this frameset, but couldn't get the manufacturer to either send me a catalog or even return my phone call. Doesn't seem like this would be too much to ask if I'm going to be dropping $2K on a frameset. Am now considering other options. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Eeny Bear
a weekend warrior
from a happy, smiley place
Date Reviewed: November 25, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I ended my search for my personal bike by selecting an Uzzi SL - or so I thought. A friend wanted a Chuck CR-FS and one was promptly ordered. The very impatient but lovable friend talked me out of my new, un-built Uzzi SL frame while awaiting delivery of the Chuck. That left the Chuck unclaimed. Oh well, I thought... someone will want the Chuck and then I'll get my Uzzi. Then... I saw the Chuck and the name intense dropped from my vocabulary. So light, so strong, so beautiful, so red... Like a bike-crazed Emeril Lugossi I ran around the frame, kicking it up a notch - BAM!! - xtr rapidfire shifters and front and rear (rapidrise) derailleurs... BAM!! - raceface cranks, stem and bar... BAM!! - real 24-34-42 rings... BAM!! - magura raceline brakes and boosters... BAM!! polished '99 Z1bam... BAM!! Mavic 521d's with 14g straight spokes... BAM!! - IRC Kujo2.35 front and 2.25 El Gato rear... BAM!! time atac pedals... BAM!! selle italia saddle on a thomson elite seatpost... As is it weighs in at just under 30 pounds of glorious indestructible efficient mountain-climbing majesty. For a reasonable XC contender for a strong rider like me I could swap out the round stuff for 517's, db spokes, and IRC Mythos tires to yield a weight a shade around 26 pounds. Obviously you could build a sub-25 pound bike for around the same cash if you were a lighter rider than me and could select less robust and lighter parts. To each their own. In any event, the best place to lose weight on a bike is in the round stuff - hence my suggestion.But 30 pounds feels like 20 with this design - no exaggeration. I like to climb climb climb until my lungs explode and my legs vibrate so I can take a brief break, anticipate the reward, fire off on the well-deserved trip down. I don't just smile, I laugh out loud all the way down!Even though the geometry is best suited to a 4 travel fork according to 'Chuck' I have not yet made the modification to my Z1. The 5 travel just invites me to try bigger drops, go faster, and ride harder. I get all the benefit of the travel with none of the drawbacks I may have expected. This incredible suspension design seems to eliminate front or rear pedal-induced bobbing (with all due respect DaveT, but this is a definite improvement on the burner-type walking beam linkage - sealed bearings too!). I must admit I went about five whole feet on my first ride before I got used to the plush ride with complete satisfaction thereafter. The steep head angle retains all the required steering precision even with 5 travel. I may try the 4 kit to satisfy the amateur engineer in me not because I'm suffering in any way..As you might guess, I am delighted. Could there possibly be a drawback to this frame? Hmmm, I suspect the stand-over height is not as forgiving as some of the interrupted seat-tube designs. Perhaps I'll end up with a ball burnished top tube after all. Seriously, there is ample room if the right size frame is selected. Rule of thumb: subtract 14 from your inseam to obtain a reasonable guess at the right frame size for you (works for any bike, obviously). Yes, the components I selected add to the experience. While I had specific and well supported reasons for selecting the components I did, I am sure that you, the reader, will have opinions and preferences that differ. That's one of the beauties of the sport, isn't it? I could go on forever but I'd rather go riding. Depending on the time of year, the personal time available, and the local geography, all the rider categories captioned above apply. What could be more fitting than top marks from a thoroughly satisfied rider? | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Tim
a weekend warrior
from Orangevale Ca.
Date Reviewed: November 1, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I hav'nt ridden my CHUCK yet, A little more money and a little more building and i'll be ready for any trail. I did however recieve my new CR-FS so I feel justified to review it.
The fact is that this has got to be the absolute trickest most advanced and well engineered full suspension mountain bike frame in the world, all the things the other bike manufacturers dream of, like the sealed cartridge pivots, I cant wait to feel how rigid yet perfectly smooth the suspension feels. I saw someone complaining about the stickers, mine came with the PPG clearcoated over them and they look awesome, can't do that with powder coat.
I also liked very much the conventional front triangle, When done up with the monocoque design it looks totally cool and creats strength and rigidity out of this world.
Overall this frame is a beauty and everyone who sees it is amazed, 5 stars are not enough.
I would like to thank Darren Murphy and the people at CHUCK for building me a frame that keeps me feeling like a kid | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
otismojo
a cross-country rider
from Indianapolis
Date Reviewed: September 15, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Just received my Chuck CR-FS and it was worth the wait. The fit and finish on the bike is first rate. The deep red paint and polished rear end are incredible. I would recommend the american flag paint if money is not an issue (simply amazing). My only beef is that the lettering are decals not painted on, but are available at request. I immediately removed the rear shock and was amazed at how smooth and buttery the cartridge bearing rear end felt. It glides up and down unlike most of the other companies friction bearings. I have to believe that like the Intense frames cartridge bearing pivots are the way to go. Once I assembled this jewel I was instantly in heaven. Granted it took a bit to set up the frame, but once dialed in it was amazing. The combination of cartridge bearing pivots and the coil over rear shock this thing rides like butter. You forget how rought the trail is and pinch yourself to convience you that you're not on a couch. Don't take me wrong, however, you retain all the feel of the trail without the penalties. The ride is a sweet mix of cross country handling and downhill prowess. The short headtube allows you to keep the front end low and hookup in the corners. Body positioning is midway between front and rear using both ends of the bike effectively. The shortish rear end also hooks up well on the climbs and this thing will conquer anything short of pure verticle. The bike handles fairly quickly in tight single track situations without feeling nervous. On the downhill side it is a piece of pure riding satisfaction. The plush rear end soaks up everything in site. Feels like endless travel once setup properly. The longish toptube takes away the jitterness of smaller quick frames and is at home on the decents. I must mention the mono frame. The bike's rigidity is second to none. There is no flex especially at the head tube. There is not bump too large to throw this thing off line. The boxed rectangular rear end is also stout and really shines in the rough allowing the suspension to absorb all the energy without any twisting which plagues may rear end designs. The frame is a nice combination of cross country single track handling and downhill satisfaction. I don't think this is a frame to win many cross country or downhill races with, but it was not designed to. It allows the majority of us riders to have a fantastic combination of real riding both up and down while maintaining a permagrin while we hammer away. My hats off to Darin Murphy for designing something to keep a few of us addicted. (One last mention is the lifetime frame warranty - won't find that on anything else in this league!!)
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Michael Posluszny
a weekend warrior
from San Francisco California
Date Reviewed: September 12, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
REVIEW CRFS Have put about 250 miles on my chuck.It corners and turns just like a dream.When you put the petal to the metal drive toqure is where you want it it really flys.This is a bikers dream bike.The bike is 10 times better looking than its pictures people are coming up to me constantly asking questions or saying how great it looks.I was a little weary spending the kind of money I did but am very happy fr my disision.If you enjoy bike riding as much as I do the CRFS Will fill all of your needs.The suspension system (I used a Manitou Exvert from Answer as front fork) absorbs the hardest shock I given it.I used hayes disk brakes (which are great) with DT Hugi hubs
Panaracer Fire Pro 26x2.1 Tires, all XTR, Grip shift 9.0 Sl, Chris King Headset, Syrevos Stem,Answer ProTaper gold 2.5riser handle bars,Rynolite rims and answer Rocker 126.8 seat post.
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mike Sproul
a downhiller
from Salida, Colorado
Date Reviewed: August 26, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Suplemental review. The more I ride my chuck the more i am impressed. It does everything in a superior manner. I rode recently with my buddy who had a Ibis Szazbo. In the very beginning of the ride he got off his bike to walk down a couple of steep rocky / rooted sections. I thought mabey there was broken glass on the trail and thats why he walked. No glass,just an inferior bike. I rode down on my Chuck like it was butter. Total control. Later in the ride the Chuck smoked his Szazbo on all the technical climbes like he was riding a Huffy. He is probably a stronger rider than I however all the strengh in the world could not get him up the dicey climbes. His bike simply would not do it. The chuck climbed right up as if to say whats wrong Szazbo, cant you climb this little rocky-rooty pimple of a hill? The Chuck CR-FS makes baby drink out of all the most dificult climbs and decents. The more I ride the chuck the better it gets and as a result the better I get. If you are looking for the ultimate all arround mountain bike and you don't buy a chuck, your'e blowin it! I repeat, the Chuck rules in every way. You can either ride a Chuck, or wish you did ! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
JOHN
a racer
from CONNECTICUT
Date Reviewed: July 30, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I'm putting a review of my CHUCK CRHT (Hardtail) here because I saw someone else's here. I bought this bike a month ago (used/ridden twice).
It was built with a complete XTR kit including a radially-laced wheelset; a
Marzocchi Z-2 Bomber; and lots of tiny(expensive) details such as SRP bolts.Pricing this bike out by searching numerous advertisments for the best possible
prices, this bike would cost at least $3600.00. (over $4000.00 full retail). I bought this bike for $2400.00. Still alot of cash for a bike but a steal for this
particular bike. PERFORMANCE!-- This bike is unreal! It climbs like the space shuttle and tracks like an Indy car. I was previously riding/racing a super V 1000 which was a good , but heavy for racing at 28 lbs, bike. My Chuck weighs 22.5 lbs with a
bomber!!! I could easily drop a pound and a 1/2 by adding a SID or a White Bros. UL but why? The Bomber is super plush and seems reliable. Bottom line...... The Chuck is a terrific bike for what it is intended for----to win races. It is less comfortable than my super V for regular trail riding but I guess
any hardtail would be. If you want to win races......buy a Chuck!!!!!!!!!!
| | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Gregg Howard
a racer
from Laguna Niguel, CA
Date Reviewed: June 16, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
This 3rd generation suspension bike is flat out the best bike I've ever ridden! I was considering the Uzzi..until I got my hands on this beauty. This is the first bike I have been able to put into a 2 wheel drift and really enjoy feeling how the bike reacts to this. I can't say enough about the neutral braking and the superb handling of this bike. Darren Murphy has really done his homework...I can't wait to see the 4th generation now on their drwawing boards! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Vince
a weekend warrior
from CA, USA
Date Reviewed: June 16, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
There isn't a place yet for the CHUCK CR-HT (hardtail) so I decided to crash the party and brag about it here!
I LOVE THIS BIKE! I've ridden/owned several hardtails and full-boingers and can't believe how well this thing rides. Let me get to the point:
Tight technical singletrack: very nimble and light handling. Carves the switchbacks beautifully and climbs like a goat on acid. I'm used to having to weight my rear wheel on the steepies for traction - unnecessary here. May even result in the front wheel coming off the ground a little. Just settle in the seat or hammer out of the saddle.
Fireroads: the slack headtube angle (~70.5) makes for extremely stable conditions at 35+ mph. The wheelbase is a longish ~42 but the effective toptube length does not stretch you out. I compare the riding compartment to my GT STS DS1000 - comfortable reach with room to spare.
Actual weight: 22 3/4 lbs
Spec'd: XTR all; Syncros stem; Titec 118g Ti bar; Titec Magnesium Shorty b-ends; Sachs Extreme shifters; Crossmax wheels; Tioga XC tires (RULE!!); 747 SPD's; WTB SST Ti Kevlar saddle; Answer Rocker seatpost (nice adjustability); Judy SL LT w/ Speed Springs
Answer: Not enough CHILIS in Mexico for this rating!
I dealt with Darin Murphy at CHUCK directly. He's a great guy - stands behind the product in full force. Lifetime Warranty on frame. Wheel World in Woodland Hills, CA built it up for me (Mike G. - mechanic, John J - Manager) | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Andi Mullin
a cross-country rider
from California
Date Reviewed: March 25, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Chuck CRFS I just built this hand maid beauty and have five rides under my belt. I can't believe how plush yet rigid it rides. It is first class in every respect. The guys at Chuck helped me out with set up and are really cool.I have owned a GT LTS, and have ridden nearly all the top bikes in this category. My Chuck rules! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mike Sproul
a downhiller
from ASPEN, CO
Date Reviewed: February 23, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
THE NEW CUCK CR-FS IS ABSOLUTLY KILLER, I REPEAT KILLER! IF YOU ARE
LOOKING FOR YOUR DREAM BIKE LOOK NO FURTHER, THE CHUCK IS IT. THE
ULTIMATE IN HAND CRAFTMANSHIP, TOTALLY CUSTOM. IF YOU ARE LOOKING, YOU
MUST TAKE A LOOK AT THE NEW CHUCK LINE UP. PLUSH AS MY LIVIN ROOM
COUCH YET NIMBLE AS A ROCKY MOUNTAIN GOAT. GOES DOWN HILL AS FAST AS
YOU DARE AND GOES UP HILL ALLMOST AS GOOD AS MY 600cc HONDA. ALL THIS
AND A LIFE TIME WARRANTY TO BOOT!
| | Overall Rating: |
| |
|
Photo Caption Contest
(sponsored by Maxxis)
|
Enter here
|
|
|
$
