Gary Fisher Level Betty FH1 Bike 1998 or Older

DESCRIPTION

Gary Fisher Level Betty FH1

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 20  
[Mar 16, 2002]
Daryl McCormick
Weekend Warrior

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Strength:

First...I noticed that Ray from Kansas, an apprent "downhiller" (isn't Kansas Flat?) gave this ride a poor review, only the subject of his negative comments was alomst exclusively related to user-definable ride characteristics. I have had this bike for four seasons...I don't get wobble, bobbing or any other crap like that because I took the time to dial my ride in to fit my riding style and weight. Its capable on technical climbs and descents, though it can get bouncy is slower technical sections.

This bike is a blast. Its not so heavy that I could ever complain about weight. The travel is plush and adjustable, the ride IS active and the geometry is super comfortable. I don't endo as much on this bike as I did the fully rigid Rockhopper I had before.


I have taken this bike on a 48mph downhill run and it can definitely haul ass...plus it takes to the air quite readily and easily.

Weakness:

Whazzup with the super long stock seatpost and that P.O.S. seatpost clamp?

The rear shock should come with a lockout switch (like the GF Joshua does) at this pricepoint.

It should have come with stock disc brakes.

Bottom line is this: the is an excellent free-ride bike. Its not so light that you can't actually race it in an XC or 24hr race, while the suspension doesn't affect climbing in any significant way; there isn't much bob if you set it up right. It descends like a demon if you have the skills. With mods this bike can be used in a wide range of racing situations (i.e. - XC, DH or DS).

Similar Products Used:

MARIN B-17, TREK Y-33, Specialized FSR

[Dec 30, 1999]
Chris
Weekend Warrior

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
Strength:

A good all-around bike, easy maintenance.

Weakness:

RockShox front & rear

I got this bike as a left-over in spring of '99 at a reduced price which also included the upgraded rear brake, hub, and rim for $1700. Before the purchase, the bike store sent back the rear shock because it was leaking. Three months later I blew the Judy XL on a 4' wheelie drop. After those repairs I haven't had a problem. Hayes brakes are the best, easy to maintain and if you ride during the winter, you don't have to worry about ice, muck, etc on your rims. This is a good bike once you get the rear dialed in. This bike has just as much or less bob than any other , including some swing arm designs I've riden. It's a FUN bike. I love riding it, especially down hill!

Similar Products Used:

Almost all '98-'99 full suspension XC and free-ride bikes

[Jul 21, 1999]
John
Weekend Warrior

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
Strength:

It just feels great

Weakness:

Rock Shox rear shock

Personaly i like the bike... The URT system works fine, for someone that only wants to have fun... it bombs down hills craving for more, it's a tough and low maintenace, only one pivot... and i've machine a new pair of plates that hold the rear shock that make the feel a lot more progressive and i think that i gained at least 1/2 to 1 inch of rear travel but i'm gonna check on that and to you more exactly on this...it's a good bike!!!
keep ridin!!!

Similar Products Used:

---

[Nov 23, 2000]
gavin messenger
Weekend Warrior

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
Strength:

quiet!(no clanks or rattles), very plush, cheap, good value

Weakness:

judy xl's on the front, paint came off when I took off some of the stickers!

An awesome bike!! I purchased this bike 2nd hand, and, bar filling the cartridge with 12wt oil and swapping the elastomers with speed springs, it has performed far greater than my current skill level, leaving me with knackered legs and a big smile every time! The riding position is great, not feeling cramped or having the feeling you're going over the handlebars. The only thing I would change is to upgrade to discs and to put a decent set of forks on (the mods helped but only to a certain degree)

Similar Products Used:

mongoose 6.7, 8.1, 9.5

[Sep 05, 2000]
Lindon
Cross Country Rider

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
Strength:

Makes me smile when I ride it. Gets me out on the trails.

Weakness:

All the stuff other people write. It's all true. I still smile.

It's for fun. That's the bottom line. All the cons are true, but I'm not out to race, I'm out to have fun, and this bike lets me. So what's wrong with that!

Similar Products Used:

Trek 8500LT, Giant 890

[Aug 17, 1999]
Ray
Downhiller

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
Strength:

Name is cool

Weakness:

URT, frame both are terrible, they flex and bob. You notice the flex especally on sidehills. Bobbing happens everywhere.

To rephrase Ron Barr this bike is a complete joke! It sucks as a freeride bike because the rear suspension won't do what you want it to, i.e. jumping, slamming bumps. URT's are terrible because they are not fully active. Also this bike is not built stiff so it flexs a great deal further robbing power. Maybe one of these bikes will work for 40yr olds who tend to write in and give good reviews but for anyone with some nuts the bike doesn't have what it takes. Sucks ass, Cartman

Similar Products Used:

Specialized FSR, GT LTS

[Jun 27, 1999]
Peter
Weekend Warrior

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
Strength:

Good spec for the price as with most Fishers. Inherent USA made quality.

Weakness:

Rock Shox customer service.

Never was a fan of URT, however with the Genesis geometry the bike feels better. This bike has been PUNISHED and always comes back for more. I can't think of a ride where a big smile didn't come over me since the bike is a fantastic all-rounder. Sometimes we need to put aside personal preferences and evaluate the bike on its own merits - that's where I can honestly say that this bike is a winner. The only drawback was a blown fork cartridge which took weeks to replace, and perhaps the higher maintenance levels these new bikes require. My only wish is for a rear disc which will stop the shredding of rear brake pads. Don't buy this bike to race - buy it for all round fun and you will be happy. Well done Fisher (okay - Trek, but Gary did design the thing).

Similar Products Used:

Trek Y3, Diamond Back V-Link, Fisher Joshua

[May 21, 1999]
Mike
Weekend Warrior

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
Weakness:

RS Super Deluxe

I think it's a good bike, a fun bike... The only thing a disliked about this bike, are the RockShox fork and shock. I changed the RS Judy XL for a Jr-T and the Super Deluxe for a Fox Vanilla RX, and wow! what a difference, especially with the Fox... the rear end is more sensible, it soaks up every thing, and reduces the bob, and the Jr-T, well for a freeride fork, can't beat them, and handles really well for downhilling... Like the review before me, you buy this bike to have fun, not to race!!!

[May 09, 1999]
Matt
Cross-Country Rider

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING

This bike is not about racing or competition. It's not about weight. It's merely it's name: the FH1. It's a Fun Hog. It was designed for fun and that's what it's about. if you're a diehard weight freak or x-country rider (like myself), than you buy a lightweight XC bike. If you're a DH'er and the suspension and toughness is the key, buy a DH bike. If you don't care if you win or lose, an just want to have fun, buy a bike like this. It's the kind of bike that just puts a smile on your face after a good hill, and not really caring if you want to beat the next guy. Ride b4 you buy. 5 chilis for the fun hog.For the techno-weenies, the braking is primo, shox are kind squishy, shifting is great, replace the seat, tires stink, though it has 101mm in the front and 130 in the rear -- it's still semi-light (i don't know exact weight, prolly around 25) and it all looks pretty good too....all work and no play is no good at...

[Feb 06, 1999]
Chris
weekend warrior

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING

I agree with Ron Barrs review (see earier posts). After selling my Fun Hog and purchasing a Cannondale Freeride 900 I can now see drawbacks to the URT concept. The bike bobs and that is a fact. I don't care what anyone says to defend the bike the fact still remains. I know, I fought against this problem the entire time I owned my bike, around a year. It was a very long year, filled with anomosity towards by bad purchasing decision. With my C-dale I have found that I do not have to change my style or conform to the bike's design. I just ride and enjoy efficient power transfer due to a superior design. No more pedal and brake induced suspension activity, just pure and simple forward thrust. I read reviews on the other sites concerning the Y-bike design and have found that the owners tend to be very loyal to this design. This tells me either it is the best type out there (which it isn't) or that the owners have never truthfully experienced any other suspension design. I have ridden the linkage types FSR's, LTS's. and Kona's but was swayed in my choice of the Super V because of almost equal performance with far less maintenance. The URT is not a performance orientated bicycle design this can be proved by viewing the new Trek catalog featuring the VRX. The URT Y-bike will soon die out and be replaced with far better suspenion designs. I can't wait to read the negitive reviews on sites like this in the following year!

MTBR Newsletter

Get the latest mountain bike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the MTBR Newsletter

THE SITE

ABOUT MTBR

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2024 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.