|
Camelbak
Hawg Hydration Pack
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Submitted by
nezined makulit
a Weekend Warrior
from batangas
Date Reviewed: October 19, 2005 | | Favorite Trail: | xc type off road trail | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$124.00 | | Purchased At: | bratpack | | Strengths: | it has plenty of stuff to be placed in..and the new bag allows the air flows at your back, makes it comfortable and not that hot considering you've been biking for so many hours with it sitting on your back. | | Weaknesses: | its heavy but its for trail riding and epic rides so it doesn't realy matter as long as you've got the things you necessary must have during those kinda'ride. | | Similar Products Used: | zefal, and other smaller camelbak with 70oz reservoir | | Bike Setup: | hardtail disc trailbike, just change the handlebar and flip the stem to a negative and you've got a competitive xc position although must consider my bike's weight (25 lbs)which is still heavy for xc racing. | | Bottom Line: | nice hydration bag..can be used on multi day biking with stop overs of course...can carry lots of loads like a couple of shirts a raincoat, other stuffs like emergency med kit..some trail foods and bars, slippers and some tools..if your a weight winny forget about it and don't carry anything and have your stuffs be carried by a more manly bike mates of yours,ok? | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Swami
a Cross Country Rider
from Missoula, MT
Date Reviewed: October 13, 2003 | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$80.00 | | Purchased At: | REI on sale | | Strengths: | smart design: little velcro bits to gather up loose shoulder straps, two small pockets next to hip straps for tucking them away, very good compression to suck up space, back pads actually work -- keeping the pack from soaking your back, zippered access to bladder much better than the velcro "slide it in" method, bunjee -- oh lord how i love bunjee, and it just fits nicer than any of the smaller camelbaks. | | Weaknesses: | i don't like camelbak's valve system for the bladder, so i'll probably get a platypus three liter when this camelbak bladder goes bye bye. | | Similar Products Used: | camelbak classic, more platypus bladders than i can count. | | Bike Setup: | two wheels, a frame, handlebars, seat, etc.... | | Bottom Line: | i hesitated to buy this bag because i thought it was mondo big, esp compared to the mule. but then i tried a mule and filled it with water and realized that i could only fit the essentials. so that meant i had a bike specific bag. i don't like to buy anything that has too specific a use.
the hawg can hold a TON of stuff. it's suprising, really. just today i had all my little gizmos, pump, tubes, stocking hat, lined windshirt, midweight polypro top, pair of corduroys and boxers, socks, and 2L of water all inside the bag. on the outside i had my shoes and helmet. i was impressed. (and no, i didn't bike with all this stuff.) when i got on my bike i just had the hat and polypro top inside the bag and boy did it cinch up nice and tight. the bag can be made quite small.
while riding i didn't notice the pack at all. and coming from a camelbak classic, i sure expected to feel at least a bit more bulk. nope. the pack disappeared. i like that.
as an added bonus, i now have the perfect sized pack for snowshoing/xxskiing in the winter and hiking just about every season. a very versatile pack.
4 for value -- at $100 it is too pricey, though you get what you pay for.
5 overall -- the pack won't limit you and can serve multi-sport duty. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Michael
a Cross Country Rider
from Jericho, New York
Date Reviewed: September 28, 2003 | | Favorite Trail: | Rocky Point | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$76.00 | | Purchased At: | Brands | | Strengths: | Tons of storage, easy to use, comfortable, well designed and well made. | | Weaknesses: | None identified. | | Similar Products Used: | None. | | Bottom Line: | This is my first hydration pack. I decided to go with a relatively large pack and I am glad I did. The three liter capacity comes in handy on a hot humid day and I believe I will be greatful for the storage as the weather turns colder as there is plenty of room for a jacket, fleece, etc.
Although the pack is big, I think most of the weight is the water. As you ride the pack gets lighter, so even when out over three hours I have not found the weight to be an issue. The design of the pack makes the removal and insertion of the water container a breeze.
Besides the fact that you can drink on the fly, another great feature about the Camelback is that the mouth piece stays clean, unlike water bottles where the mouth piece constantly gets covered with mud and dirt. Also you can put ice in the container, and the insulation in the pack keeps the water cold for hours. After just six weeks, I have to say it would be hard for me to ever go back to bottles, except for really short rides. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Eric
a Cross Country Rider
from Oak Park, IL
Date Reviewed: August 25, 2003 | | Favorite Trail: | Palos (ATB) / Prairie Path (Road) | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Strengths: | Holds tons of gear and plenty of water, very comfortable. | | Weaknesses: | A bit too bulky for shorter rides when you only need H20. | | Similar Products Used: | 2 water bottles and cages, regular backpack | | Bike Setup: | ATB = GF Tassajara '98 (rigid)
Road = Custom built (Concord frame, Shimano 105 parts) | | Bottom Line: | They thought of everything when they made this Camelbak.
Over the months I've been using it, I've developed my own system for using the various compartments, which allow for a great amount of gear -- multitool, tubes, chow, extra clothes, cellphone, etc. The straps are great -- very comfortable; I can wear this thing for hours, on and off the bike.
At first I was wishing that the waist strap had some kind of compartment on it for keys and such, but I just attached a key ring thingy to one of the shoulder straps and now I hook my key on there, when I need one at the ready.
The only real downside for this pack is that when I'm out for a couple hours of pure biking -- not going somewhere with stuff like extra clothes or whatever -- it's a bit too big. For hitting the trails (ATB or road), I'm considering getting a smaller pack. Something with storage only for an energy bar and tools/tube and 70 oz. of water would be ideal. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Ryan R.
a Cross Country Rider
from Long Island N.Y.
Date Reviewed: August 21, 2003 | | Favorite Trail: | Dirt ones with trees and some rocks | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$100.00 | | Purchased At: | Bike Planet | | Strengths: | Plenty of storage room way better than the Mule, Tough built carrier has taken some hits and no rips, Bladder for 03 is way better than the 01 to 02 much better seal and now the cap is teathered to the bladder itself, Bladder loading is better than the Mule the zipper is much better than velcro, Air flow back actully works unlike the lame attempt in the 01 to 02 models, excellent cubic inch volume not too small but not to big PERFECT! | | Weaknesses: | Unable to remove lumbar strap unless you cut it off yes there is pockets for them but I would much better like to just remove it. could use a better internal organizer Thats it! | | Similar Products Used: | Camelback Blowfish, Camelback Mule and the old bottle and cage | | Bike Setup: | Specilized Stumpjumper FSR XC | | Bottom Line: | This is the greatest hydration pack ever! The volume for storage is great. The mule always came up short and you always had to leave something behind. Not with the Hawg I now have removed the seatpack from my bike to lighten it up I can fit everything I need in this pack! The bladder construction and tase is much better in the 03 models than previous models. The seal is much better and doesn't leak and the bladder doesn't tase nasty like the other ones did. The dual bladder idea is great but I don't think I will ever use it. It could use a better internal organizer now that you can haul more stuff but that's petty and will probably be fixed in next years model. My only grip is that the lumbar strap can't be removed it can be stored in the pocets in the back straps but I would just like to remove it instead. The air panel really works and helps to keep you cool when it's really hot. The pack realy deos a good job at keeping the load stable I have yet to have it move around on me. This pack is simply the best on the market for hauling allot of gear ond water hence forth the name. If your looking for a pack that can fit it all and 100 oz of water too this is it. If you only haul a little get a mule but for a truly epic ride GET A HAWG! You won't be sorry PEACE! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Joe
a Cross Country Rider
from Philadelphia PA
Date Reviewed: July 2, 2003 | | Favorite Trail: | Wissahickon Valley | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Price Paid: |
$70.00 | | Purchased At: | Bike Line | | Strengths: | Size, strength, stability, ruggedness | | Weaknesses: | um, what weaknesses? | | Similar Products Used: | CamelBack Classic, water bottles | | Bike Setup: | Stock 2003 Rainier | | Bottom Line: | Sweet pack, holds everything, loses nothing. It's light, spacious, and stable on your back. Get this pack if nothing else. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Michael
a
from PA
Date Reviewed: March 11, 2003 | | Favorite Trail: | Near Blackwell, PA | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Purchased At: | LBS | | Bike Setup: | This section should be labeled "Use:", as in "I use this product for..." | | Bottom Line: | Use: Everything from all day XC and road epics, aggressive XC, commuting to work, day hikes, XC skiing.
This is an older model, about 2 to 3 years old.
Great pack. If I lost it I'd get another in a second. Holds a fair amount of gear. Can strap plenty of gear to the outside. I keep my biking tools, patch kits, lighter, and compass in the side pockets, keys and wallet go in the small front pocket and the large main compartment is for extra clothes, food, and tubes.
I've considered getting a Transalp for commuting and for for overnighters.
Compared to the Mule (another nice pack) it lacks the many small pockets for organization but I've not found this to cause any real problem, just a slight inconvenience. This pack can hold much more than the Mule but my model weighs only a bit more. Unless having the extra capacity makes the pack unstable or too heavy, which is not the case with the HAWG, it's "better to have and not need, than to need and not have."
Quality: Zero complaints and this pack has been used hard. Great construction. This pack is pricey but since it has never failed me I feel the the price is waranted. You get what you pay for.
Bottom line: If you get only one pack, the HAWG is the pack. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Nathan Campbell
a Weekend Warrior
from Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
Date Reviewed: November 3, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | Suspension Bridge | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$100.00 | | Purchased At: | Freedom Machine (Internet) | | Strengths: | -Got it for a bargain price of $199 Aussie Dollars
-Tons of room for anything you need
-3Litre water capacity
-Waist and sernum straps for excelent stability
-Love the bite valve on the bladder, has never leaked for me. | | Weaknesses: | - Sweaty (this pack gives you a really sweaty back) they should try the mesh systems of some other Brand packs on the HAWG
-A few little zipper conpartments inside the pack would be good to hold small things. (Money etc)
| | Similar Products Used: | None, Its my first | | Bike Setup: | Giant Rainier 2002(stock) except, Mavic F519 Rims,
Shimano PD-M424 pedals | | Bottom Line: | I have the HAWG 2002 model pack. Its my first pack and i love it. I do 3-4 hour rides and the weekend and like to have a few spare tubes, tools, food, water, phone, spare clothes (in winter) and this pack allows me to do that.
If you love your trail riding and like to have some gear with you than this is the pack for you.
5 chilis for pack take one for sweaty probs | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
RT
a Cross Country Rider
from Woodinville, Wa
Date Reviewed: July 13, 2002 | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Price Paid: |
$100.00 | | Purchased At: | Gregg's Greenlake | | Strengths: | Holds everything I need (and then some). Great fit & good airflow to the back. | | Weaknesses: | Expensive. | | Similar Products Used: | Camelback Iceback, Rouge, and many, many water bottles. | | Bottom Line: | This is the most comfortable pack (hydration or otherwise, that I've ever owned. The fit is fantastic (for me, at least). I use this for riding, day hiking, in-line skating, etc. If you can afford it, buy one! | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Chris Brodie
a Cross Country Rider
from Sydney, NSW, Australia
Date Reviewed: May 12, 2002 | | Favorite Trail: | Old Northern Road(Convict Trail) | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$225.00 | | Purchased At: | Panther Cycles | | Strengths: | -Plenty of Space
-Excellent Weight distribution on your back
-Good tube routing
-Solid construction
| | Weaknesses: | -None found yet | | Similar Products Used: | Blackman Hydrapak (70oz) | | Bottom Line: | The old Hydrapak was designed to carry 70oz however try also carrying your wallet and a mobile in there as well...I busted the zipper trying to get everything in.
No so the HAWG, I now have space for food! YAY! I also carry a Marmot Precip rain shell, a decent sized first aid kit, pump and Alien Tool at all times with plenty of space for a full bladder and food.
Surprisingly this doesn't give me the back pain the old pack did, the weight, though now double what I used to carry is pain free for hours(tested it on a 6 hour ride yesterday) where the Hydrapak was giving me hell after about 45mins.. This was the main reason for looking for a new pack.
The BigBite valve is a great idea, no mechanical moving parts, the Hydrapak valve occasionally gets grit in it that jams it open requiring a good wack to clear. The Hydrapak also leaked a little from the valve which was just a little annoying on a long hill climb. Over shoulder is a good idea, the Hydrapak tube was always getting caught up when putting it on, in addition it makes refilling easier as the values doesn't need to be threaded through a little hole.
External cable straps allow for some cold weather gear to be attached if needed, the external mesh pocket reachable with a little effort.
Litle more expensive than what I would have liked but it feels like a quality product. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Richard Utting
a Downhiller
from Windermere, UK
Date Reviewed: January 23, 2002 | | Duration Product Used: | More than 3 years | | Price Paid: |
$70.00 | | Strengths: | Loads of room but collapses down well. Stays where you put it on your back. Hydration system pretty much flawless. Really fairly waterproof, too | | Weaknesses: | it beats me how they keep improving them every year | | Similar Products Used: | Other CamelBaks and a few of the imitations | | Bike Setup: | Big DH stuff | | Bottom Line: | Absolutely diamond. I don't ride without it. I've battered it rithlessly and it just keeps on ruling | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Flyer
a Cross Country Rider
from Chicago IL
Date Reviewed: January 11, 2002 | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$85.00 | | Purchased At: | LBS | | Strengths: | Well constructed. Nice design. Easy to put all my stuff into and easy water access and filling. | | Weaknesses: | I haven't found any. | | Similar Products Used: | Camelbak Mule | | Bike Setup: | 2002 Giant xtc se2 with lots of changes | | Bottom Line: | I have a camelbak mule, but was finding that while it held everything I needed, there wasn't really enough room left over to stuff a jacket or other things in during the winter months and still fill the bladder completely full. I bought a HAWG because it holds my stuff, and I have room for snacks, a jacket or rain jacket during all day rides. This definately fills the bill! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
JB
a Cross Country Rider
from Los Angeles,Ca
Date Reviewed: December 31, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | Brianhead Singletrack, Utah | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$80.00 | | Purchased At: | Supergo | | Strengths: | Lives up to its name: Holds Alot of Water and Gear!!!
Omega Res. is easy to clean, and easy to put ice in. Suspension straps keep the pack firmly on the back.
Much better than the water bottle!!!Probably the best invention in cycling history!!!
Water-Resistant to a certain degree, good places to hold pump, tools, shoes, map, and keys.
Great Hydrolock system!!!Great Padding!!! | | Weaknesses: | Haven't found any yet | | Similar Products Used: | The Platypus 70 oz system (the no namer), lots of bottles | | Bike Setup: | GT LTS-3 1997 model, still stock except for tires | | Bottom Line: | The HAWG has been tested in the field and has classic technology by the makers of CamelBak. This hydration pack stands up to all who try to live up to it's name --"down blackburn, hydrapack, scwhinn, etc." Go Camelbak | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jon
a Racer
from Greenfield, WI
Date Reviewed: October 28, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | John Muir | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Price Paid: |
$85.00 | | Purchased At: | some place in Colorado | | Strengths: | durrable
H.A.W.G. | | Weaknesses: | expensive
I've heard that Camel Back supports the sierra club which doesn't make any sense
straps are kinda long | | Bike Setup: | Homegrown XT/XTR/titec etc. | | Bottom Line: | This pack is great for longer trips. Holds alot of water and gear. Bad for racing. duh. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mountain Man
a Cross Country Rider
from Ontario, Canada
Date Reviewed: August 15, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | Two Creeks | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$100.00 | | Purchased At: | GT's Bike Shop | | Strengths: | — Holds A lot of Water and Gear
— 100oz. medical grade bladder
— Big Bite Valve flows a lot of water very fast
— Good overall construction
— The independent harness system is ingenious... it keeps a large load very stable without being uncomfortable on your back
— Blows Blackburn, Schwinn and other imitators out of the water | | Weaknesses: | — Expensive
— Only a one-year warranty. A hydration pack this expensive should have a lifetime warranty. | | Similar Products Used: | HydraPak... It can't even compare to the CamelBak. | | Bike Setup: | '00 Schwinn Moab 1, Thomson, Syncros, blah blah blah. | | Bottom Line: | As the name implies, this pack is huge by hydration pack standards. Including the bladder, it has a capacity of nearly 20 litres. Well organized zippered pockets, as well as a huge compartment to store clothing, helmets, etc.
I agree with the reviewer below me in that the one-year warranty is stupid... I paid 1/3 this much money for a pair of ROACH shorts (an article of clothing that goes through far more abuse than a CamelBak ever will), and it has a lifetime warranty. The cordura is a little thinner than I'd like. I don't think it will rip, but I can't be sure yet.
This pack is so comfortable, I don't even realize I'm wearing it. The self-adjusting waist belt and the independent suspension system ensure that.
I think I got ripped off, because my pack doesn't have an insulation tube for the hose! Regardless, I feel this product deserves 5 chilis overall. However, due to the extravagent price and a terrible warranty, it gets two for value. | Value Rating: Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Clevor
a Weekend Warrior
from Yokosuka, Japan
Date Reviewed: August 7, 2001 | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$79.00 | | Strengths: | I like the design of the Hawg such as the use of compression straps top and bottom. Lots of pockets and a keychain loop. The crimson pack actually looks pretty nice with the yellow contrasting zipper pulls and logo. The color is not too dull and not too bright. A textured surface is used for the contrasting grey Cordura.
Very good independent harness a la expensive backpacks, and a wide hip belt. I recommend people forego the Mule and Blowfish and spend the extra $20 on the Hawg, since it has an insulated pocket for the hydration tube and comes standard with the Big Bite valve. The Hawg is not that bulky and heavy at all. | | Weaknesses: | Paper thin Cordura! Measly 1-year warrantee! | | Similar Products Used: | Jandd, Gregory, and Ultimate Direction (the Big Time, folks) | | Bike Setup: | Gary Fisher Paragon 2001 | | Bottom Line: | What prompted me to write this review is to criticize the thin layer Cordura and lousy warrantee on the Camelback products. If you ever used pro backpacking/hiking products from the companies mentioned above, you will notice they use very thick, heavyweight Cordura, and all their products come with a lifetime warrantee.
The fact the Cordura is lightweight and given the short 1-year warrantee means if the product comes apart or is torn easily, you are on your own. The Camelbacks are also rather expensive considering they are mainly small capacity backpacks/hydration carriers. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
DR. DRE
a Weekend Warrior
from BOOGIE-DOWN PROD.
Date Reviewed: August 2, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | STEEP & TECH. | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Price Paid: |
$69.00 | | Purchased At: | JENSON USA | | Strengths: | STYLING, LOTS OF ROOM, BUILT UP PRETTY DURABLE. GOOD CHEST AND WAIST HARNESS. | | Weaknesses: | WISH IT HAD A PLACE TO SECURE YOUR HELMET. WAIST STRAP TWISTED. THE WAY IT'S DESIGNED IT LOOKS LIKE IT WILL BE HARD TO FIX. | | Similar Products Used: | CAMALBACK FROM DAY ONE | | Bike Setup: | 2001 BIG(PIMP)HIT. HOPE, DOUBLEWIDES, Z1, EASTOM, THOMPSON, SDG, RACEFACE, XTR AND SRAM. | | Bottom Line: | I AM ABLE TO FIT MY SONY HANDYCAM CAMCORDER AND PUMP WITH AN INNER TUBE IN THE BAG. IT ALSO HAS TWO POCKETS ON THE SIDE. IF U CARRY A LOT OF STUFF DEF. CHECK ONE OUT. NICE BAG. NICE CONSTRUCTION, DURABLE. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Neil M
a Racer
from lehighton, pa
Date Reviewed: July 26, 2001 | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$90.00 | | Purchased At: | pricepoint | | Strengths: | the size, not just the bag, the water carrier too | | Weaknesses: | nothing really, the upper strap that goes across the front of u which is elastic was sort of falling apart, but that may be because of me. | | Similar Products Used: | my friend has the mule, its just as good with less space | | Bike Setup: | sugar3 | | Bottom Line: | if you want to take everything u would possibly need with you, buy this.
if u only take a few things, just get the mule or for 24 bucks on pricepoint, get the hydrapak.
| | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Pascal Cholin
a Cross Country Rider
from Poitiers - France
Date Reviewed: July 6, 2001 | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$80.00 | | Purchased At: | outbackgear.com | | Strengths: | Year 2001 model. Excellent design with user in mind. Very comfortable when heavy loaded. Choice of color. Better model than the 2000 serie. Feature options that you usually find on bigger and more expensive backpaks. The one and only choice in his category ! | | Weaknesses: | None found yet. A integrated rain cover would have been much appreciated. (Too) expensive, as many Camelbak products :-( | | Similar Products Used: | Narrow Gauge (1996 ?)- Military HAWG (1999)- The Rocket - The Unbottle (1,5 L) | | Bike Setup: | Specialized Enduro Comp (2000) | | Bottom Line: | I am a big fan of Camelbak products (see past review). They are the best designed water carrier -ever. My 1999 Maximum Gear HAWG did not hold enough gear and water for a full day, 8 hours trip (100 + 0.75 o. reservoirs / lunch food / tools / safety kit / hot-rain clothes) and was painful to carry when (too) heavy loaded. The 2001 HAWG is the perfect size for my needs. Construction is of top quality, no troubles at all with stiches. The back panel conformes very well to your back, no pain at all, even with a 12 lbs load. It was difficult to obtain the Black & Grey model, only the bright colors were available in Europe for some times... Why ? Also, I am a bit disappointed by the CamelBak Company, as they never answered any of my e-mails about troubles I had with one of my reservoir (leaks). The US retailer where I bought it did a great job by replacing it at no charge but I would have appreciated much consideration from the NR 1 manufacturer. Just pay and ...go to hell :-( | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Lyndon
a Weekend Warrior
from Salt Lake City
Date Reviewed: May 31, 2001 | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$65.00 | | Strengths: | More room | | Weaknesses: | Straps pinch, would like to see a better design to keep pack off of back. | | Similar Products Used: | Would have liked to have tried tried the Jannd. | | Bike Setup: | Marin Bear Valley Hardtail, RhynoLite wheels, Bonti Revolts,Time Atacs... | | Bottom Line: | I am not impressed with the construction, and agree with many about the ease of cleaning the bladder system. Shoulder straps pinch. Certainly needed the larger bladder.
On the way out past Hurrah Pass to Chicken Corners in Moab, I drank two 100 oz, and half of another this past Memorial Weekend, thanks to 4WD'ers. It was hot! If I had known I was going to drink that much, I would have put on the two water bottles as well, since this is not a tough technical trail. This is a review of the 2000 model. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Max
a Cross Country Rider
from Boston, Ma, USA
Date Reviewed: April 26, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | Martha's Vineyard | | Duration Product Used: | 2 Years | | Price Paid: |
$100.00 | | Purchased At: | IBC | | Strengths: | excellent design for an all purposed bike bag. | | Weaknesses: | lasted me for 2 years on all the bike trips. but did not last 10 minutes with my brand new pitbull pup. | | Similar Products Used: | camelbak classic, camelbak mule, camelbak flashflow, cannondale hydrobag. | | Bike Setup: | 98 specialized elite, full xtr, spox m1, flite ti, monkeylite, control tech stem, 98 synros al post, sid xl, chris king headset. | | Bottom Line: | The best bag at the time that will hold everything you can possibly need on an extended bike trip. The 2001 HAWG is even better. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Niki Motoh
a Cross Country Rider
from Ljubljana, Slovenia
Date Reviewed: April 15, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | alpen, slovenia | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$110.00 | | Purchased At: | freestyle | | Strengths: | Quality is supreme, details are made good, except stiching. I believe it will serve me for a long time. It is light, can carry a lot of stuff, 3 litres of water. Even in hot conditions, your back is not too wet because of good ventilation, and straps hold it firmly on your body, two over shoulders and one over stomack and the other over chest. You also have extra belts, to squeeze your bag. | | Weaknesses: | my straps loosen up a bit, when streching on bike, than one strep is larger than the other and your camelbak turns on your back a little bit and can be quit anoying, so you have to stop and repair the straps to same size. | | Similar Products Used: | waterbottles | | Bike Setup: | marin nail trail 2000 european version with jett race forks | | Bottom Line: | it is a good feeling having it on your back, it is not a problem at all. I even put my photo with extra lenses in it, because it has a lot of space. It also looks nice. So i realy cant imagine a trip without it anymore. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Luke Ty
a Weekend Warrior
from Baltimore
Date Reviewed: March 16, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | Loch Raven | | Duration Product Used: | 3 months | | Price Paid: |
$100.00 | | Purchased At: | Campmor | | Strengths: | I picked up the "military" Maximum Gear version because it looks so much better/stronger and there is no webbing to catch on trees and tear off. I've got all my tools, spare tubes etc. in the pack. Sipping water at will is great. This pack is comfortable and well made. | | Weaknesses: | The ones for sale at the bike shop look cheasy and I don't like all the colors. Expensive. | | Similar Products Used: | Water bottles and cages. | | Bike Setup: | XR-4 | | Bottom Line: | I really like not having any bottles or cages on the bike frame. I also got rid of my saddle bag and put all my tools and parts in the bag. The result is a more quiet, lighter bike. After looking at all the packs at the biking and outdoor stores, I decided to order the "military" Maximum Gear version online from Campmor. I'm glad I did. It looks great and feels strong. I'm not sure why more shops don't carry the Maximum Gear Camelbaks instead of the standard version. The price is up there, but I'm glad I got one. I don't ride without it, and it does not interfere at all. I don't even feel it unless I have to duck under a fallen tree. I have been keeping the bladder in the refrigerator when not in use to keep the funk out. So far everything has been great. I used some baking soda to get the taste out of the bladder when new. Go get one ASAP, you will be glad you did. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Frankie
a Weekend Warrior
from SD CA
Date Reviewed: March 14, 2001 | | Duration Product Used: | 2 Years | | Price Paid: |
$69.00 | | Purchased At: | Navy Exchange | | Strengths: | Good fabric, robust bag and strap stitches, big enough for the well organized commuter | | Weaknesses: | Profile is high, which makes it snag low branches, that blinker loop came off within one week. | | Similar Products Used: | MULE | | Bike Setup: | What does that have to do with a pack review? | | Bottom Line: | There is no comparison between Baks and other hydration packs. Yes 'Baks are precey but feel the material on Blackburns and other packs, they feel flimsy and cheap. Camelbak uses a synthetic material that feels more like canvas.
I use mine for commuting and for those epic, far from the madding crowd rides. It pretty much holds everything. I cinch down the mesh strap if I have something in it, like my pump, and I have never lost anything coz it fell out. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Matt
a Weekend Warrior
from Bolton, MA
Date Reviewed: February 20, 2001 | | Favorite Trail: | anything with dirt and steeps | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Price Paid: |
$95.00 | | Purchased At: | Eastern Mountain Spors | | Strengths: | -100 oz bladder is great for long rides.
-plenty of room for tools, food, extra clothes, etc without being bulky or awkward.
-very comfortable, I forget it's there sometimes.
-chest and waist strap holds it in place perfectly.
-great ventilation.
| | Weaknesses: | -a little pricey.
-the bladder gets really gross after awhile and is a pain to clean.
-bladders are about $25 a pop and I usually end up buying a lot of them.
-leaky bite valve. | | Similar Products Used: | -Cannondale hydro-packs | | Bike Setup: | Cannondale F2000SX, HeadShok Lefty DLR, XTR, CODA | | Bottom Line: | A great all around hydro-pack, especially for long rides. It does an amazing job of holding tons of water and gear without being bulky. I just wish those bladders were cheaper and easier to clean | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Joe Munro
a Weekend Warrior
from Ellensburg, WA
Date Reviewed: December 31, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | Tiger Mtn. | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$89.00 | | Purchased At: | www.universalcycles.com | | Strengths: | All the straps, 100oz bladder, ventilated back, pads. | | Weaknesses: | Mesh pocket on back, whats with the triangular shape that thing doesn't hold crap. | | Similar Products Used: | Water bottles | | Bike Setup: | TREK 8500 with LX components. | | Bottom Line: | The bottom line is the pack is phenomenal. 100oz might seem too much but I prefer to have more than less especially on all day rides. Depth of pockets is great can hold everything from med kit to full tool set, if you want it. Mesh pocket on the back could use a little better design and tighter elastic. Other than that its 'da SH*T' | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jackson
a Weekend Warrior
from MA
Date Reviewed: November 18, 2000 | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Price Paid: |
$80.00 | | Purchased At: | LBS | | Strengths: | lives up to its name - holds a lot of water and gear
detachable waist and sternum strap
coolmax backing | | Weaknesses: | poor stitching,dumb mesh pocket design, doesn't come with camel clip, dumb light strap design,price
high clearance when bag filled with gear | | Similar Products Used: | bike bottle | | Bike Setup: | Stumpjumper | | Bottom Line: | Great bag. It does what it's name says: it hold a lot of water and gear. No more leaning over to grab bottle. No more worrying about if I brought enough water. Comes with sternum strap and waist strap. Came with hole pre-cut on the big compartment to hold another bladder if you want. Insulated padding for the bladder. Poor stitching - the bottom tightening strap ripped right off as I tried to tighten the bag - with only a light tug too! The trianglar front mesh pocket is the dumbest design - everything falls out!! The strap for mounting a blinker on the back is placed at the dumbest position. I don't put anything in that mesh pocket and then the light - the mesh is too weak and the light flops down resulting in no one being able to see the light. The two side pockets are practically useless. Filling those up means the same thing as filling up the inside since the side pockets take up the inside space as it is filling up. The bag clearance is pretty high if the bag is filled up. You have to remember that or else you end up hitting a tree branch that you thought you cleared. The bag is WAY too expensive. I had to pay $80 only after a 20% off coupon! Buy it only if you always pack a lot of gear on rides. Powerbars can fit on the jersey pockets. only 3 chilis since it costs so much. 4 chilis since it does it's job but has some stitching and design problems. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
ctg
a Weekend Warrior
from na
Date Reviewed: August 18, 2000 | | Duration Product Used: | Less than 1 month | | Price Paid: |
$60.00 | | Purchased At: | Army Navt Store | | Strengths: | Holds lots of gear, plenty of water, straps hold it centered on your back. | | Weaknesses: | Stitching seems poor. Useless mesh pocket (except for possibly a windbreaker) unless you want to lose whatever you put in it. | | Similar Products Used: | Camelbak Hydrobak. | | Bike Setup: | 100% Rigid. | | Bottom Line: | I upgraded to this from the Hydrobak for more water and to carry all my gear. I love having the frame clean, the bike feels much more responsive now. The workmanship could use some work, When I got it one of the pockets was already ripped away from the stitching, but I did get it for $35 off so I can't really complain. If I had the cash I'd look for one of the maximum gear ones. 5 chili's for value since I got it cheap. 4 for poor workmanship. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Pascal CHOLIN
a Cross Country Rider
from Fontainebleau, FRANCE
Date Reviewed: June 19, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | Keep it secret ! | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Strengths: | Designed with user's spec. in mind. Great construction qualities. The separate insulated reservoir pocket is a great idea : it protects the bottle from punctures and keep the liquid cooled. Low profile that will keep your back(nearly) dry. The name says it ! And of course, the CamelBak valve is still the best on the market... | | Weaknesses: | A bit too small. The loading capacity is not well designed compared to the "old" Narrow Gauge. For example, the triangular mesh pocket is useless and the compression straps are not long enough to be slack. Expensive ($110). Accessories are also overpriced. | | Similar Products Used: | Narrow Gauge | | Bike Setup: | Sunn Revolt | | Bottom Line: | I used the now discontinued "Narrow Gauge" for years and was so satisfied that I wanted a similar product from CamelBak. Despite a higher price, I bought the military HAWG ("Maximum Gear" Line)because of stronger stitches and an all black "stealth" color (more discreet in the woods than red & light blue). I got it from treasuresandmore.com (excellent prices & service). On the minus side, I found the loading capacity smaller than the Narrow Gauge and side mesh pockets are missing for extras like energy food. I improved the "heating resistance" by sliding a piece of aluminium foil between the back panel and the reservoir, keeping water cold for at least 4 hours. All in all, this is the best hydration bag in his category. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Tom Doyle
a Cross Country Rider
from Hayward, California, USA
Date Reviewed: May 27, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: | Lake Chabot Loop | | Duration Product Used: | 6 months | | Strengths: | Holds PLENTY of water & gear simultaniously. External zipper pouches & net pouch are a plus! Fits snugly & securly to your body, but does not hinder upper body movement. Light yet strong material. | | Weaknesses: | Occasionally a zipper will stick. Also, I cannot seem to get the waist belt tight enough for my liking. | | Similar Products Used: | Blackburn Amazon Hydrapack | | Bike Setup: | 1999 Gary Fisher Paragon
1999 Trek YSL 200 | | Bottom Line: | This pack has yet to let me down. The bite valve took a bit of getting used to, but now I would not ride with out it. This pack has more than enough storage space for a 15-30 mile MTB advenutre. I usually fill the bladder 1/4 of the way full, and caryy a cell phone, 2 power bars, a first aid kit, my wallet, my car keys, kleen-ex, and a walkie talkie. After all of that stuff, I still have plenty of storage space left over. On longer rides, I have packed a lunch comfortably with all of my other gear. All of the adjustable straps can be a bit overwhelming at first, but after you have been using the pack for a while, you will see the advantages and versitility. Camel Bak designed this baby to last! | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
frank
a Weekend Warrior
from Ca
Date Reviewed: January 15, 2000 | | Duration Product Used: | 1 Year | | Bottom Line: | All this pack needs is a redesign of that mesh pocket. The triangular shape doesn't make any sense as far as securing your cargo is concerned. They should make it in a shape like the MULE's, just go straight across and give it an elastic edge to keep it shut. This pack is good for carrying all your tools and food and jacket/shell etc etc. Some folks would prefer the sleeker MULE not realizing that you lose most of the space in the main pocket once you fill the bladder up with water. But for Boy Scouts (be prepared), packrats, or epic riders, the HAWG is it. Stuff it and tighten the cinch straps and you're ready to go. If you need a smaller pack get the Blowfish. It too is expandable unlike the MULE. | | Value Rating:Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
KingMarkus
a Weekend Warrior
from Yorba Linda
Date Reviewed: January 11, 2000 | | Favorite Trail: |
ChinHills/Full.Loop/Saddleback | | Duration Product Used: |
3 months | | Strengths: |
Holds just about everything
(Including a small tent on bottom straps) | | Weaknesses: |
Needs to have removeable straps.
Redisgn of pocket layout.
Fat Guys may have a problem with limited waist strap length. | | Similar Products Used: |
Camelbak M.U.L.E.
3 water bottles on a full-suspension frame.
1 gallon waterjug in a backpack. | | Bike Setup: |
Gary Fisher Procaliber '99
Marzoc. Z1
Rhino Rims
Panaracer XC Pro | | Bottom Line: | Having used the MULE for two years and needing more storage space, I bought the HAWG. The HAWG does exactly that, holds more stuff. Especially a large water bottle to
double your water carrying capacity if you decide to leave your closet at home and concentrate on riding long distance. BE CAREFUL WHEN STORING CAMERAS. I destroyed a 3 day old digital camera ducking unsuccessfully under a branch. The pocket layout is kinda strange: One Huge storage pocket with three or so smaller pockets hidden around the outside of bag. Downside to this: Trying to get to the spare tube at the bottom of the bag turns your trailside repair spot into a MTB yardsale. Car keys tend to work themselves to inaccesable points beyond by the time the zipper completes closure. If I were to make the purchase decision all over again, I would compare the Blowfish and the HAWG and choose according to personal preference.
The ability to carry 200 oz. of water helps extinguish these four burning horses. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Trent
a Weekend Warrior
from Utah
Date Reviewed: December 16, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Any Utah trail | | Duration Product Used: |
3 months | | Strengths: |
It's huge! Holds a lot of water and gear. Lots of compression straps to tighten things down. Comfy, even when loaded. The mouthpiece works better than my old Avenier. | | Weaknesses: |
People complain about the quality, but I've only had mine for a couple months, so we'll see. No pump retaining straps (it bounces around in the big pocket). | | Similar Products Used: |
Avenier. That was a good pack, but the mouthpieces were faulty (they kept splitting), and since they're no longer in production, my LBS can't replace them. Bummer. | | Bike Setup: |
Supergo frame, very old XT components, Indy XC | | Bottom Line: | So far so good. I'm anxious to see if my pack has the reliability problems that so many of you have complained about. I like the pack a lot, but wonder if the Blowfish would have been better. But, until I have any problems, I have to give the HAWG five flaming rats. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Craig
a Weekend Warrior
from Manchester, England
Date Reviewed: November 21, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
3 months | | Strengths: |
Large capacity for gear.
3 litre bladder.
Large bite valve and screw cap large enough for ice cubes.
Lots of straps to tighten it if there is no luggage in it.
Chest & waist strap keep it firmly in place. | | Similar Products Used: |
Water bottles, saddle bag | | Bike Setup: |
Coyote HT3, Z3 Light | | Bottom Line: | Able to take different items of clothing so you can decide when out on the ride not prior to it.
Keeps drinks cool, never needed to use ice cubes, if the drink in cold when placed in the bladder it will be whenever you go to drink it. Chocolate can be shoved in with the bladder to keep it cold.
I am considering night-riding and this would mean I have both bottle cages empty to store batteries for lights, this is a potential benefit.Far more conveniant than water bottles. Possible to drink on very hard climbs! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
cIRCitmage
a Weekend Warrior
from New Haven, CT
Date Reviewed: August 26, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
AT | | Duration Product Used: |
2 Years | | Strengths: |
Large and Roomy ... massive amounts of water are nice to have on hot rides or just arund town ... especially this summer in the North East | | Weaknesses: |
Surprisingly Narrow ... hard to get wide/bulky items in (ie Helmet, Shoes, etc...) stiching is 3rd rate (have had to mend it a couple of times - has been easy but is a pain ... mouth is too narrow to easily load ice-cubes into it ... old style bite valve allows only a dribble ... unless you clean it frequently, water has a funky plastic taste | | Bottom Line: | This bag does what its suppossed to and much more ... I wish the build quality was better, but then again, I use this product hard and know how to use a needle and thread in a pinch ... minus one chili for cheap stitching, but otherwise a great product which I wouldn't get on the trail without (and I've had it for a long long time now) | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
ZZ
a Weekend Warrior
from Toronto, Ont.
Date Reviewed: June 23, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
3 months | | Strengths: |
Holds almost anything,
good for hiking as well.
3 litres !!! | | Weaknesses: |
Might be too large for someone who strictly wants to pack water. | | Similar Products Used: |
none, | | Bike Setup: |
96 stumpjuper lx, xt | | Bottom Line: | It can get very humid in TO, so a 3 hour plus ride requires more than just a water bottle. Good quality, no leaks, bite-valve works great. A pain in the ass to clean though. WATCH OUT FOR LOW BRANCHES :) | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Will S.
a Cross-Country Rider
from Spokane, WA
Date Reviewed: June 11, 1999 | | Favorite Trail: |
Anywhere! | | Duration Product Used: |
3 months | | Strengths: |
Everything! Could not love it more. More handy with every use! | | Weaknesses: |
None that I have found so far. | | Similar Products Used: |
Bottles-bleh! | | Bike Setup: |
Barracuda AR2 w. Rockshox Qudra 10- irrelevant to camelbak | | Bottom Line: | Once I tried it, I would never go back. The space is unexpendable- you could bring the kitchen sink if you so desired. The 100 oz. bladder is a bottomless pit. i've taken 40 miles with it with the bladder still 1/4 full. The water stays ice cold for hours when you ice it to begin with- which you can do with the Camelbak bladder. I love it!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
>_<
a Weekend Warrior
from So Cal
Date Reviewed: May 3, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
6 months | | Strengths: |
Lots of space for the packrat in you. You can carry clothes, snacks AND every emergency tool you can think of. | | Weaknesses: |
Overkill for short, local rides or urban assaults. | | Bike Setup: |
My back and shoulders. | | Bottom Line: | I bought this big (for a waterpack) HAWG for my commuter use. A chest strap and a waist strap helps when loading it up. In the early morning it holds my undershirt, work socks, lunch, tools, and a small coffee bottle just about everyday. Going home, it carries my riding jacket as well. With a little creativity, I was able to transport a pair of Doc Marten's boots one time along with my regular load. It is kinda big for just plain local recreational rides, so I just throw all my tools into a saddle bag and slap on a water bottle and holder for weekend trips out on the local trails. Then on Mondays, said saddle bag just goes back in the 'Bak. Don't get a MULE or any other midsized pack of you are a commuter. You can never have to much space if you are riding your bike everyday right? | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Allen A
a Cross-Country Rider
from Maine
Date Reviewed: April 7, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
2 Years | | Strengths: |
Sturdy, well built | | Weaknesses: |
None for it's intended purpose | | Similar Products Used: |
Camelback Mule, water-bottles/seatpack | | Bike Setup: |
Several | | Bottom Line: | This is a great all purpose hydration system. When riding off road you have plenty of room for all of your gear, food, windbreaker, etc. The compression straps keep everything tight. Interior of the pack is a dayglo yellow, makes it easier to see in sketchy light. I also use mine for commuting. Have used and abused for over 2 years now, and it is as good as new(hose the mud off and you are good to go). I spent about $60 for the HAWG, and it was money well spent. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Nat
a Weekend Warrior
from WA
Date Reviewed: April 5, 1999 | | Duration Product Used: |
6 months | | Strengths: |
Holds Alot of Gear and Water. | | Weaknesses: |
The blinker holder came off in the first week. | | Bike Setup: |
97 Stumper. Judy XC Englund conversion >:) | | Bottom Line: | I use this pack mainly for packing my stuff for my daily commute. I got mine for 70 bones at a Navy Exchange. It came with a 100 oz bladder, which is really big enuff for anything I can think of. It has a chest strap and a torso strap to stabilize it and the body is well insulated. It also has jacket straps at the bottom for your wind breaker. Well made, 'cept for the cheesy blinker holder on the mesh pocket which came off as soon as I used it. No biggie tho. The bag itself is sturdy. I do feel uncomfortable hopping when I am wearing it, but maybe that is just my lack of skill :o) | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
John
a cross-country rider
from KY
Date Reviewed: January 14, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
I got the HAWG about 5 months ago and Haven't had a single problem with the pack. It's a great bag if you also hike. I've taken it to the smokies several times and let me tell you 1ooml if water and all that storage space is money on a long day hike. I like how it really sucks to my back for such a large bag.
I looked at alot of bags and This one is a 5 flamer all the way.... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
john
a weekend warrior
from Melbourne,Australia
Date Reviewed: January 8, 1999 | | Bottom Line: |
The HAWG is just about all you need for day long rides.Great storage, big blad, comfortable and secure straps. The chest strap can be discarded and has. Great quality product, I would definately buy another CB product. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Eric
a weekend warrior
from Tampa, FL
Date Reviewed: December 21, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
In Tampa, it's HOT in the summer. This unit holds plenty of water and has survived a season of freezing the bladder while it is half full. It holds all that I need, but I am seeing some fatigue in the stitching. Having spent years in the skydiving industry, I know what can be done with nylon stitching, and do see that there could be improvements in the construction of this pack. I have had it for 11 months, and 1500 miles...I am happy, but would be happier with higher quality workmanship.
BTW, the bite valve really sucks...for the last few months it has been dripping rather annoyingly...upgraded to the Blackburn spring-loaded valve...we'll see how long that lasts... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Paul
a cross-country rider
from San Francisco
Date Reviewed: November 16, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I got the HAWG for over a week now and I really like it because now I don't need to wear jersey to stuck everything in my pocket. I can wear anything I want. I don't know how durable is it but I use it both on off-road and road ride. I notice that I drink a lot more water compare to when I use water bottle, probably because it is so easy to drink. I will post later for its durability. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Travis Bickle
a cross-country rider
from CANADA
Date Reviewed: September 23, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I had the HAWG for just over a year and must say that it really worked well untill some seams started to come apart recently. I had purchased it at the Mountain Equipment Co-op so I took it back and they replaced it with there own brand of hydration pack which is similar in size and function. The MEC bag looks better put together than the HAWG but time will tell. Well I liked the HAWG very much until it started to come apart like a cheap suit. For the price I should have been able to hand it down to a grandchild, not have to repplace it after 13 months. Htas off to the MEC who really stand behind everything they sell. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Dave
a cross-country rider
from CA
Date Reviewed: September 22, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have the original Camel, Mule, and a Hawg. I have had the Hawg for about 1 year. It has been a great bag. However, the shoulder straps leading into the lower part of the bag area. This area the red fabric has pulled away from the padded seam. CamelBack says they need 5 wks to look at it and maybe not even warrant it. I think that is not only poor of them but very unwilling to support there product in a timely fashion. This is the 90's, I expect a new bag in 1.5 weeks or the bag fixed. How many of us can afford to buy two separage 100 dollar bags while one is out getting fixed ? | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
John B.
a weekend warrior
from Urbana, Illinois
Date Reviewed: June 28, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
It does what is says, it hold alot of water and gear. It's been 90+ here the past work. The Hawg is comfortable and I can't say I notice that I'm wearing it. The collmax back works. I just fill mine with as much ice as I can stuff in it and I have very cold water the whole ride. The compartments are well sealed and the construction is very durable. I can't hear my tools rattling around like when I had a seat pack. Overall I think water back packs are the way to go. I could care less if bike came with any water bottle mounts. I'm not fond of drinking mud and animal feces. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Eric Bucks
a
from Toledo
Date Reviewed: June 24, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
i almost bought this pack. i tried it on in stores twice and thought it looked well-made. but in the end i bought a Tailwind from Ultimate Directions. why? first off, the Tailwind rides low - more on your hips than on your shoulders. fit is a matter of personal taste, and i know the UD pack is more comfortable for me. YMMV. it's got a nice large belt for your hips, much larger than the HAWG. The shoulder yoke on the UD pack is really nice too-- it allows the pack to move when you bend or twist without pulling on the straps as much. finally, the UD pack has more of a usable cargo area. it's not as narrow as the HAWG, so you can pack wide stuff like frisbees, textbooks, a helmet, etc. i use my pack daily going to/from work. a typical load is a rain jacket cinced to the outside, rain pants, pump, lunch and shoes for work in the main cargo space, and the smaller pocket holds my wallet, a taillight and a cateye headlight should it get dark. that same load would really be a stretch for the HAWG. does that make it a bad pack? nope. but when it comes to comfort and cargo load, the UD Tailwind was a better.3 peppers for construction and what i hear is a better bite valve. i gave the tailwind 5 and like it even better now that mine has a blackburn valve. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Mart
a weekend warrior
from Ortonville, Mich.
Date Reviewed: June 21, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I got the Hawg about a month ago and I love it, but to me there is room for improvement. The basic concept is great, it beats water bottles hands down. I find myself constantly sipping and staying hydrated. It does insulate, but not for as long as some people are saying. On a hot day in the sun, it might stay cold for a few hours, but thats it. Ofcourse this is much better than a water bottle. I think the net-style pouch on the outside should have velcro or snaps for a more secure set-up, as it is, I wouldn't put anything in there valuable because the only thing securing it is a cinch strap and gravity. For storage there is one huge compartment for a rolled up jacket, or whatever. Now my other complaint, there's only one zippered compartment that will fit a wallet, or compact camera, that will give you an idea of its size. There are also two side zippered pockets that are pretty small, about big enough for car keys or a tube repair kit. I can't give 5 stars because it cost almost 90 bucks, and to me I think the compartments could be improved upon. One more thing, I use it almost daily on my hikes with Rover, so I get double-duty from it. All in all, its a good investment you won't regret, and the quality is very high. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Buckwheat
a weekend warrior
from Lookout Mtn. TN USA
Date Reviewed: May 28, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I have had the HAWG for 2 days. It has been EXTEREMLY hot, and all that water kept me playing. My friends were dying because it was 95 degrees and it was incredibly humid. I saved 5 goals and I am not even goalie. All that hydration and room for all my soccer stuff (climbing stuff also) let me be ready for the game. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Scott
a cross-country rider
from Charleston, SC
Date Reviewed: May 27, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
Not really sure how you could make a better hydration/pack unit. It has just the right storage and water capacity without being too bulky. It may be a bit pricy, but your paying for a quality product. As far as cleaning the bladder, I just wash it out with hot water after every ride. Never had a problem. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Doug
a cross-country rider
from Arl. Heights IL
Date Reviewed: April 13, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
I just got the HAWG the other day but I have been using the MULE for a few years now. Since I haven't riden with it yet I can not comment on the performace on-trail but with the past experience of the MULE I assume it will be great. The only reason I replaced my MULE is that the HAWG allows me to carry much more of anything I want. First thing I did was to fill both 100 oz bladders that I have and stuff them in the HAWG. Wow. I had one tube coming over each shoulder for an endless supply of water. I could fit all the stuff I carried in my MULE ( full compliment of tools, pump,and first aid kit) in the HAWG with out even using the super large center pocket. Killer. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
mike
a cross-country rider
from Wooster, OH
Date Reviewed: March 26, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
*****************Having problems cleaning your Camelbak?******************** First: DO NOT BUY THOSE EXPENSIVE CLEANING PRODUCTS!!!!!!! Instead of that $15 device that effectively dries out your bladder, USE A BENT HANGER!
Second:when cleaning your bladder, do not buy those expensive cleaners or even soap. The former doesn't leave a residue, but using Palmolive will leave an aftertaste of soap for about 20-30 uses. Instead, let the fungus sit in ARM'N'HAMMER baking soda for a few hours. No nasty aftertaste, and all the fungus is gone.
Source:I haven't learned these things from wasting money, I just listened to my mother who has cleaned things effiecientlt much longer than I have been alive. Try it, it works!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Matt DeWitt
a
from weekend warrior
Date Reviewed: January 17, 1998 | | Bottom Line: |
It was great. Plenty of room !! I had a sweat shirt , rain gear,first aid, pump, patch kit ,spare tube, and snacks .I still had lots of room . Its great quality.I didn't like that the chest strap was so high. I took it on some longer trips and found that your back gets really sweaty. It didn't stay cool like they say. I traded it in after 2 weeks and bought a Mule . I still could fit everything in it and get rid of the high riding strap. Overall I give it a 5. But I like the Mule better. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Tony
a weekend warrior
from SanJose, CA
Date Reviewed: December 12, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Overall, the Camelbak Hawg is an outstanding product - way, way better than
drinking from a dirty, warm plastic bottle. The bite valve works perfectly,
and your water will stay cold for hours. Plenty of extra space for food, tools,
jacket, etc. So far, my only complaint is that the chest/sternum strap is not
sewn together very well (right where the label is sewn). Mine started unraveling during a trip to Arizona. That really pissed me off. This is
covered under warranty for a year though. I just hope that my second one
doesn't un-ravel on me. C'mon Camelbak, redesign the sternum strap! I wanted
to give it five chilis, but the poor stitching will have to bring it down a
notch. Four chilis. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
jg
a cross-country rider
from sj, ca.
Date Reviewed: November 18, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Don't waste your money.... buy a Jandd Inyan | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
cIRCitmage
a weekend warrior
from New Haven, CT
Date Reviewed: November 14, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I just got this pack the other day, and we had a Nor'Easter today!!!...bummer...was planning on a nice long ride to try it out, but I'm not maniaical (sp?)...One dissapointment was that the stiching holding the retaining clip for the outside mesh came off before I even tried it on!!! ...Not a huge deal but was frustrating after I had paid so much for it...BTW I paid $67 from Bikeworld.Com, and it came with a pack of candy! ;-)...the phone guy was a bit flaky (so whaddya want to today ...dude?), but the price was great and they were extremely helpful...I'm giving three chilis...minus one for the stiching...and there is always room for improvement | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Biff
a weekend warrior
from USA...A-OK
Date Reviewed: September 7, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I bought one of these as soon as it came out. For something that is sewn together, I don't think I've ever owned anything with such good quality. The workmanship is AWESOME!Obviously, this is one well-thought-out product. They didn't skimp on anything. It's plenty adjustable, roomy, and nice and comfy for long rides, even when the bladder is completely full (90 oz.). Although it's a bit pricey, it's a good investment.The thing I don't get is why mine is a really dark red color, and all the others I've seen are a much lighter shade. Bonus, I guess... | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Jason Bartell
a weekend warrior
from Mountain View, CA
Date Reviewed: August 27, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
This pack kicks major ass. I can carry more water than I've been able to drink on a ride and there is enough cargo space to carry more than twice the volume of stuff I ride with (a couple of oranges, trail mix, cliff bars, tool bag, pump, cell phone, etc.). There are a couple of elastic straps that cinch everything in so the pack doesn't stick out any more than it needs to.
Also, the waist strap threads thu the back of the pack and cinches that in as well, keeping the lower part of the pack nice and close to your back. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Allen
a cross-country rider
from Maine
Date Reviewed: August 14, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
This thing is great, had a mule before and liked it, but started to run out of room on longer rides. The HAWG is perfect. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bill
a cross-country rider
from Dallas
Date Reviewed: August 8, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
If you don't have one of these things, what are ya waiting for? The cargo is great but the water is a life saver, had to call 911 for friend a while back due to heat exhaustion, he didn't have enough fluid! I literally ride twice as far and twice as well with the on the fly sippability.
If you're waiting to need water before drinking it, it's too late! You are then trying to recover. fagetaboutit! Just get it!!!! I have the 100oz mule, alittle less cargo but same water
amount. Less fatigue, more energy. I removed one og my water cages and use the other
for 28 oz. of cytomax fluid replacement drink-electrolites. It's hot in texas!!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Kaos
a cross-country rider
from Kansas
Date Reviewed: August 7, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I purchased this beast when preparing for my first 'ride-a-bout' in the Rockies. Purchased an additional 90 oz bladder with it for a whopping total of 180 oz. Did four days of 8+ hours of riding. I was by far the most hydrated rider in the group. Was able to push much harder because of the additional liquids. I have ridden with it for 6 months now (1000+ miles) through all types of terrain and conditions. It is slightly dirtier but otherwise in the condition I bought it in. Quite durable and lots of room for extras. I ride with my cell phone in it for emergencies and haven't broken it yet. Nice padding for stuff and your bod. My only complaint is the size. One size fits all is definetly an overstatement. I'm a lifter as well and sport a 47 chest. The straps ride more in my arm pits then on my chest. Without the nice tie-over chest strap, it would be most uncomfortable. The weight (of all that liquid and stuff) is barely noticable when cinched up tight and high on the back though. Get one! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
M.R.
a cross-country rider
from Portland, Oregon USA
Date Reviewed: July 28, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I've Had The Camelbak H.A.W.G. For About 2 Months Now And Have Had No Problems
With Durability At All. (No Fraying\Ripping Of Any Kind) Right Now I'm Looking
For 2 100oz Bladders So As To Have A Maximum Of 200oz For Longer Rides.
(For Me, 100oz Isnt Enough For More Than 4hrs. Of Riding) I Would Also Like
To Say That In Certain Crashes The Added Padding Of The H.A.W.G. And The 100oz
Bladder Stored Within Has Helped Protect Me From Serous Injury. (And Mosquito
Attacks On My Back As Well) I Just Couldnt Imagine Riding Without It!.....5 Stars. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bj Munoz
a weekend warrior
from Near Phoenix Arizona
Date Reviewed: July 7, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I have really enjoyed my H.A.W.G. I was only able to find one bike shop in the Phoenix area that had them in stock. (NW corner of Cactus and 43rd Av.) Overall the pack is great but there are a few flaws in the design. 1. The mesh webbing on the front began to fray and come apart after only one ride. And, 2. The waist belt could have been designed a bit more ergonomically. It actually appears to be an afterthought. I really like the fluid and pack capacities of the HAWG and the overall sturdiness of the bag. I was recently wrapped in a crosote bush which was housing some rusty old barbed wire. The wire hooked onto my HAWG but didn't rip anything. Also noted in Bomber Bob's review about spinal protection, Camelbaks have also saved my back by cushioning impacts and has also prevented cacti thorns from impaling my back. I actually give the HAWG 4.5 flaming peppers because there is always room for improvement. Even on a great product. | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
bobbyg
a cross-country rider
from atlanta, ga
Date Reviewed: July 6, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
I haven't had a chance to use my HAWG for biking since I bought it due to recovery from knee surgery. I have used it on two family outings and it performed wonderfully. I was able to take along the needed supplies for an afternoon fishing trip with my son...a waterbottle for him, firstaid kit, and two small tackle boxes. It was nice being able to throw the pack on and carry my rod and bigger tackle box. I see no problem with the valve at all. It didn't leak and the flow seemed to be satisfactory. I can see being able to use the HAWG on day hikes as well as there is room for the 10 essentials and the water purifier too. A nice touch is that the water stayed noticeably cool for around 2 1/2 hours. I've taken camelback's advice and keep the bladder filled and in the fridge. I plan on using my bag alot this summer. I give it 5 chillis!! | | Overall Rating: |
Submitted by
Bomber Bob
a cross-country rider
from Clark NJ
Date Reviewed: June 18, 1997 | | Bottom Line: |
Well, let me be the first to say this thing is just the best in comfort. I use every bit of the 90oz of water it holds and its not even mid summer yet. I have an extra reservoir for when it really gets hot. It holds everything I need and there’s room for lots more. There's pretty good insulation in the reservoir compartment to keep your body heat from warming up the liquid. I've been using it since Feb 97 on MTB rides and have started using it on my road rides (holds more than water bottles and is easier/safer to use). I'll probably be removing the bottle cages and pump mount from my roadie soon.NOTE: I've never seen this advertised but it's worth mentioning. I know for a fact that the thickness from the extra padding and any water in the reservoir has provided good protection all the way down my spine that has probably....no...definitely saved me from serious spinal injury from the many crashes I've had. I put this thing right up there with required safety equipment like my helmet (why not...it costs as much as a good helmet). Tip: Keep the reservoir in the refrigerator between rides to prevent the taste of unwanted micro organisms.
| | Overall Rating: |
| |
|
Photo Caption Contest
(sponsored by Maxxis)
|
Enter here
|
|
|
$
